Royal Marine Reacts To Could The US Defend From An Invasion of the Homeland

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,5 тис.

  • @Northbravo
    @Northbravo 3 роки тому +1063

    The last thing a Russian or Chinese soldier would hear in the Appalachian mountains would be the twang of banjo and the crack of a mountain mans 100 year old varmint rifle

    • @lonestoner8297
      @lonestoner8297 3 роки тому +108

      That... Would be terrifying.

    • @willsofer3679
      @willsofer3679 3 роки тому +57

      Queue the song "Dueling Banjos" from the movie Deliverance.

    • @MLynn1987
      @MLynn1987 3 роки тому +18

      @@willsofer3679 I kinda want someone to make that movie...

    • @pvthitch
      @pvthitch 3 роки тому +35

      Ooo Black Betty, bam a lam...

    • @BionicBurke
      @BionicBurke 3 роки тому +44

      "I'MA MAKE YOU SCREAM LIKE A PIGGY BOY!!!!! COME HERE WITH THEM PURDY LIPS!!!!" "SUKABLYATT!!!!!!"

  • @systemspecchecker
    @systemspecchecker 3 роки тому +264

    Just the thought of an invasion force landing in Texas tickles me pink.

    • @eggroll9927
      @eggroll9927 3 роки тому +4

      I feel like its slowly trickling over the border down there as we speak. but...just a short drive from oklahoma Ill be there in a couple hours

    • @Fabs271
      @Fabs271 3 роки тому +1

      It's literally funny af.

    • @triples4good
      @triples4good 3 роки тому +15

      They would never make it through Texas! Much less the Appalachian Mountains.

    • @flamewolf552
      @flamewolf552 3 роки тому +23

      @@triples4good as someone that lives in Texas i would have to agree not to mention I feel like no civilian in America is going to back down without at least trying to knock out or punch a foreign invaders soldier

    • @Tracywhited2
      @Tracywhited2 3 роки тому +7

      Well don’t look now. Open borders much ? It’s so maddening.

  • @bryangates4591
    @bryangates4591 3 роки тому +724

    I dont think there could be a successful invasion even without the military lol

    • @lordcommissar7813
      @lordcommissar7813 3 роки тому +169

      I mean they'd probably manage to invade but the sheer amount of guns in the hands of the citizens would make holding any place in America extremely dangerous and not worth it lol

    • @gimpyrules6714
      @gimpyrules6714 3 роки тому +53

      All you guys fail to think that they have armored vehicles, most weapons we can have cant take out an armored vehicle or tank lol
      But the guerilla warfare would be very costly in the long run, and yeah we can make explosives and shit
      But if we didn't have a military at all they would be able to blitzkrieg us and it wouldn't matter
      So yes the military is def needed lol

    • @LoungingBacon
      @LoungingBacon 3 роки тому +10

      @@gimpyrules6714 then explain to me why America has so many IED's

    • @gimpyrules6714
      @gimpyrules6714 3 роки тому +5

      @Josh Smith and actually from the point of the video, the military could, it said if we pulled all our forces back to the mainland, watch the video so you don't sound stupid XD

    • @JesusIsKing647
      @JesusIsKing647 3 роки тому +14

      I live in Mississippi and no joke me and all of my neighbors have guns, from pistols to AR-16s. We could probably take on small army groups.

  • @michaeldesanta977
    @michaeldesanta977 3 роки тому +411

    *Commander:* _We have successfully made landfall in Houston and I am pleased to report that..._
    _Did that blade of grass just chamber a round?_

    • @matthewramirez6896
      @matthewramirez6896 3 роки тому +55

      "Sir. Whats the problem"
      "THE GRASS IS FIRING 556 NATO!"

    • @billrobertson5895
      @billrobertson5895 3 роки тому +1

      LOL

    • @joshualoring7842
      @joshualoring7842 3 роки тому +11

      Don’t forget the bushes with the 772 and the trees with the 50s

    • @michaeldesanta977
      @michaeldesanta977 3 роки тому +11

      @@joshualoring7842 _They're not in the trees, they are the trees._

    • @kuttdaddy223
      @kuttdaddy223 3 роки тому +20

      Sir there’s snipers everywhere with deer rifles sum guy named JW and his cousin skeeter have killed a whole squad

  • @ViolentKisses87
    @ViolentKisses87 3 роки тому +179

    Wisconsin's registered hunters alone would make them the eighth largest army in the world.
    More than France and Germany combined.

    • @billrobertson5895
      @billrobertson5895 3 роки тому +26

      And unlike the French they wouldn’t drop their guns and put their underwear on a stick to surrender

    • @erwinrommel8042
      @erwinrommel8042 3 роки тому +1

      @@billrobertson5895 are you serious?

    • @billrobertson5895
      @billrobertson5895 3 роки тому +8

      @@erwinrommel8042 those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it Vichy boy

    • @darkjourney35
      @darkjourney35 3 роки тому +4

      Only ones that would do that are the democrats. Liberals are the biggest cry babies.

    • @The_one_who_knocks_69
      @The_one_who_knocks_69 3 роки тому

      @@billrobertson5895 true

  • @mineduck3050
    @mineduck3050 3 роки тому +346

    Dude as a regular American I literally fall asleep thinking of counter invasion tactics. It's as soothing as apple pie at a baseball game, and we're all waiting.

    • @jamesslong9688
      @jamesslong9688 3 роки тому +52

      I find it comforting that if a country managed to invade the USA that mostly everyone no matter political affiliation would be like “naw that’s our job”

    • @Ozarks420
      @Ozarks420 3 роки тому +13

      I still daydream of that. Have for years!! It is soothing. Especially thinking of those little blue UN helmets we would get to pop off.

    • @charlesduncan6529
      @charlesduncan6529 3 роки тому +10

      Indeed, I think if your stupid enough to even try to invade my country then I dont feel sorry for any of you who are about to get what you deserve, and btw if I remember correctly the citizens of a country are not bound to any of the Geneva Conferences rules of engagement, so let the party begin!!!

    • @kokomo9764
      @kokomo9764 3 роки тому +4

      Really? You are not a regular American if you are falling asleep thinking about this shit. You are a paranoid individual that probably needs counseling and/or medication. It is not normal.

    • @InsaneGeraldo
      @InsaneGeraldo 3 роки тому +13

      @@kokomo9764 They made a very popular movie on this same topic, then did a remake. It was called Red Dawn. Some people think differently than others. Where I come from in the US people breathe gun smoke on the regular and these discussions are not uncommon. The US is huge and many people have many different perspectives and way's of life. The idea that the US militaries strength and citizen strength alone is enough of a deterrent for a foreign military some people find comforting. I could argue your judgment of him is not normal and you are paranoid for even insinuating he is paranoid from reading a single comment of his. Possibly you're the one that needs counseling or medication for even making the same accusation I just did... Calm down.

  • @chadleysims6815
    @chadleysims6815 3 роки тому +45

    2:41 fun fact hitler actually advised anyone against invading America directly due to how many civilians own firearms.

  • @Dragonike2Grayjedi
    @Dragonike2Grayjedi 3 роки тому +49

    Invading through Alaska would be a nightmare there are very few roads, plus the terrain is rough and mountainous.

    • @graceelvispuck
      @graceelvispuck Рік тому +2

      Invading through Alaska would mean going through the Alaskan triangle, and fun fact: you’re 3 times more likely to go missing in the Alaskan triangle than anywhere else in the world. (Probably big foot, maybe polar bears/wolves etc) I wonder if any invaders would make it out

  • @tribalwhitey2841
    @tribalwhitey2841 3 роки тому +61

    I just caught this channel. It’s awesome. This dudes material is great (class) and is just genuine. When he comments it makes me think of me and my buddies sitting on the couch just shooting the shit.

  • @tye2322
    @tye2322 3 роки тому +191

    “I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.” ― Albert Einstein

    • @vowo4931
      @vowo4931 3 роки тому +12

      "bla bla bla bla bla" - cod mw 2

    • @vicenteasaro1823
      @vicenteasaro1823 3 роки тому

      Nvm, my mistake

    • @watchthe1369
      @watchthe1369 3 роки тому +1

      I can knap flint- can you? Stones work fine.

    • @superteamtv7864
      @superteamtv7864 2 роки тому

      I see you’re a man of culture as well, I miss mw4 dude

    • @paulprovenzano3755
      @paulprovenzano3755 2 роки тому +1

      yeah? we happen to have a fair supply of sticks and stones too.

  • @odedbenyacov4961
    @odedbenyacov4961 3 роки тому +92

    "Could the U.S defend themselves from an invasion?" Depends, do they have a Ramirez?

    • @frankleon8651
      @frankleon8651 3 роки тому +5

      That's a good one that's old enough reference lmao

    • @iamilibitirenbetter3266
      @iamilibitirenbetter3266 3 роки тому

      I get that reference

    • @ThatOneType_S
      @ThatOneType_S 3 роки тому +2

      😂 exactly

    • @thorodox3796
      @thorodox3796 3 роки тому +7

      Just tell him that its Modelo Time once the invasion is repulsed. Gonzalez, Martinez, and even Mendoza would fuck some shit up real quick.

    • @justjackmarstonwithinternet
      @justjackmarstonwithinternet 3 роки тому

      * GET TO THE ฿ɄⱤ₲ɆⱤ₮Ø₩₦*

  • @hydradominatus3641
    @hydradominatus3641 3 роки тому +256

    "They would be surrounded on all sides by The South."
    Lmao.. that's legitimately the most terrifying thing ever. Nothing but methheads and alligators to greet you.

    • @Rschont11
      @Rschont11 3 роки тому +32

      Let’s not forget about those “Sweet Home Alabama” siblings that each have a gun or two and crack cocaine in their incest blood

    • @thorodox3796
      @thorodox3796 3 роки тому +8

      @J. Davis Correct, but thats still the south on all sides but the south lol. Count me out of an invasion with that plan

    • @lonestoner8297
      @lonestoner8297 3 роки тому +12

      Are the alligators on meth too?

    • @August_G
      @August_G 3 роки тому +9

      @@lonestoner8297 yes

    • @timnone2924
      @timnone2924 3 роки тому +3

      all sides but the south* talking about the fact the the gulf is almost entirely enclosed except for the small area where they come in

  • @thetalantonx
    @thetalantonx 3 роки тому +25

    3:15 - That you wanna learn more about our history as a nation matters. Thanks, brother.

  • @mikaelerosecrans2093
    @mikaelerosecrans2093 3 роки тому +67

    I like how the Picture doesn’t show Hawaii like we don’t have strength. But Hawaii has the highest Air Force reserve members in all 50 states

    • @steeljawX
      @steeljawX 3 роки тому +8

      I think history has already shown what happens when you mess with our Hawaii. But besides an awesome and beautiful archipelago, I'm not sure if there's a huge strategic value in invading Hawaii in this day and age. Before it was because Pearl Harbor was the furthest Pacific Naval base the US had. Now, we have so many fast moving and fast acting forces that any invasion that is a "moderate success" for them would become an inconvenient afternoon for you guys.

    • @fscorpion678
      @fscorpion678 3 роки тому +4

      It’s talking about a mainland invasion

    • @mikaelerosecrans2093
      @mikaelerosecrans2093 3 роки тому

      @@fscorpion678 yes so why does the American Flag have 50 stars not 49 and Hawaii already has the pacific side protected

    • @paulflores9909
      @paulflores9909 3 роки тому

      Sure. But your civilian populace can't even own a AR-15 rifle or some such derivatives. Plus, Hawaii is surrounded by water and accessible to watercraft invasion on all sides.

    • @Anklejbiter
      @Anklejbiter 3 роки тому +1

      @@mikaelerosecrans2093 do you know what mainland means?

  • @tokyosmash
    @tokyosmash 3 роки тому +28

    Also for argument, there is no such thing as “out of range” for American bombers.

  • @MrRobbiedee
    @MrRobbiedee 3 роки тому +57

    I just love the iconic "let's just shut up and whach."

    • @buckhorncortez
      @buckhorncortez 3 роки тому

      Can you explain how to "whach" since I have no idea how to do that?

  • @andrewknode56
    @andrewknode56 3 роки тому +69

    another problem for landing in Texas: the civilians have about the same amount of guns as the police force of the entire United States

    • @angryreaper9336
      @angryreaper9336 3 роки тому +12

      The enemy: ummm, why are the trees singing????
      The Trees: take me home, country roads.

    • @loganbrantley5195
      @loganbrantley5195 3 роки тому +2

      hold my beer Andrew im going to go get my thermal AK-47 us Texans built different

    • @huntermckee2279
      @huntermckee2279 2 роки тому

      Several times more*

  • @willisfiliatreault1775
    @willisfiliatreault1775 3 роки тому +66

    There's also the fact that even if they did manage to land, they would have a vietnam situation where they wouldn't know who was a civilian or not because a lot of americans own one or more firearms.

    • @alejandrosigala3502
      @alejandrosigala3502 3 роки тому +1

      We are trained in all climates, we have the navy and transport to be able to get there. Over 9 aircraft carrier fleets to do it

    • @iLikeTickles
      @iLikeTickles 3 роки тому +7

      @@alejandrosigala3502 Maybe so but it wouldn’t end too well for you

    • @BluegillsandBeyond
      @BluegillsandBeyond 3 роки тому +8

      @@alejandrosigala3502 you would be attacked with a level of ruthless violence that you can’t comprehend

    • @lawabernathy9256
      @lawabernathy9256 3 роки тому +4

      More than 200 million firearms in america

    • @expired2
      @expired2 3 роки тому +9

      @@alejandrosigala3502 Doesn't matter how "trained" you are, your entire fleet would be decimated by bombs before it even got halfway across the ocean.

  • @Halldog7
    @Halldog7 3 роки тому +89

    You have to remember that the millions of armed citzens would volunteer to join the military, thus raising the military force by millions of troops instantly.

    • @gunaddickt
      @gunaddickt 3 роки тому +18

      Absolutely and one country boy with a hunting rifle who knows how to use it can cause some serious problems for a unit they would be fighting a guerrilla force that would cause problems for any invader for years

    • @Halldog7
      @Halldog7 3 роки тому +13

      @@gunaddickt Exactly, the local sheriffs would form a militia out of the towns people and the military would reinforce us. Yes, it would be hard to fight advanced weaponry but we know our lands better than anyone. The Florida summer heat here would weaken a occupational force.

    • @SynchronicitySequence
      @SynchronicitySequence 3 роки тому +12

      @@Halldog7 Many sheriff's offices literally have Military Grade weapons and even Tanks. Thank of all the Swat teams in every town. Also many citizens in New Mexico legally own Rocket launchers and Tanks themselves.

    • @frankfedison5203
      @frankfedison5203 2 роки тому

      Why join? Then you just gotta worry about horseshit like the geneva and hague conventions. Someone tries to do dirty on me, geneva's gonna have to set up a suggestion box. There is absolutely NO LIMIT to what I will inflict on any threat to my family, country, or self - in that order. After all is done, the families of my slain enemies will be perfectly welcome to respectfully ask me if they can buy my set of Chinggis Khaan-inspired soup bowls - aka their sons' and husbands' skulls.

  • @captgaming2134
    @captgaming2134 3 роки тому +110

    In the US nearly all their citizens are armed, then you will have to fight against the most powerful military and NATO. And u will need to have a massive sea presence to get pass the best Navy in the world and somehow without them noticing.

    • @WIRTEX0
      @WIRTEX0 3 роки тому +8

      Pretty easy if you were the Master Chief......

    • @njones52
      @njones52 3 роки тому +18

      It's not that the majority of the population has firearms, its people that own them own multiple. Around 42% of the population own them but there are more guns than people in the US. Basically the majority of that 42% gun ownership could supply the other 58% with firearms if needed. Also you can buy US military manuals on basically anything, some of which being improvised weaponry and guerilla tactics. There's almost no chance of a war anyway because the moment the fed lost control the nukes would fly.

    • @Samuel2oh9
      @Samuel2oh9 3 роки тому +4

      It’s never gonna happen cause nuuukes. Simple.

    • @captgaming2134
      @captgaming2134 3 роки тому +5

      @@Samuel2oh9 maybe but I think the US and NATO will only use nukes if they were about to lose

    • @maryjoygelizon4268
      @maryjoygelizon4268 3 роки тому

      Only way they can do a succesful surprise invasion is if they made all their ships into part submarines and get there underwater

  • @Walker_Bulldog
    @Walker_Bulldog 3 роки тому +33

    "All the armies of Europe and Asia could not, by force, make a trek on the Blue Ridge or take a drink from the Ohio River." - Abraham Lincoln

  • @probably_afk
    @probably_afk 3 роки тому +117

    We DO - NOT - SPEAK of the remake bro!!!!

    • @roguewasbanned4746
      @roguewasbanned4746 3 роки тому +11

      Them censoring Chinese flags for North Korean flags was telling enough. Imagine doing the same with the Soviet Union during the Cold War, it’d be unthinkable, but yet here we are.

    • @sportsmom165
      @sportsmom165 3 роки тому +2

      The one in the 80's seemed plausible because of the cold war climate at the time. The remake was crap because no one is going to sneak up on us.

  • @richardbarnard247
    @richardbarnard247 3 роки тому +20

    ZED, you forgot the last part of Yamamoto's quote:"and they know how to use them."

  • @vancancavhcangivemeusername
    @vancancavhcangivemeusername 3 роки тому +6

    This man is just so damn wholesome. You can tell from the energy he gives off that he's a nice guy

  • @Xx_AYC_xX
    @Xx_AYC_xX 3 роки тому +160

    No no no no no no. This isn’t our fear, this is our dream

    • @James110193
      @James110193 3 роки тому +45

      I swear every american has at one point thought about a homeland invasion and just laughed about it

    • @kokomo9764
      @kokomo9764 3 роки тому +7

      It is not my dream. It should be no one's dream. Paranoia is mental disease. You obviously have never been in combat. It is not a glorious thing. It is horrible and I would never wish it on any one. I have spent the last 40 some years dealing with a combat disability. It would make me very happy if there was never another war. But as long as there are people like you who think that war is a grand adventure wars will never end.

    • @drewfehlinger4892
      @drewfehlinger4892 3 роки тому +1

      @@kokomo9764 thanks for your service

    • @Asynurr
      @Asynurr 3 роки тому +2

      @@kokomo9764 You go into war the same way you come out. War isn't for everyone. I wish people like you would second guess it before you get PTSD. It is sad, but you shouldn't have gone. Tonnes of people are fine with it. Some aren't and it is understandable.

    • @chiefdemic
      @chiefdemic 3 роки тому +1

      @@Asynurr It literally shows how you know nothing about combat and how you never been there. No man comes out the same from a war, and you never know what's gonna happen until it has already happened. "War isn't for everyone" so is there a written list on who can participate in a war and who can't? "Tons of people are fine with it" because it's their duty to defend your homeland? No one ever knows if they're going to come out unscathed or with disabilities. I hope you understand what I mean.
      I will not respond to further hostile messages as not create an unnecessary argument. My message above is towards yours and I did not mean to be hostile or rude, I just got angry at your text above to be honest.

  • @SilvanaDil
    @SilvanaDil 3 роки тому +38

    "ONLY five major American military bases are near [Seattle/Tacoma]" -- LOL, *only*

    • @nathanielsasa
      @nathanielsasa 3 роки тому +2

      That’s a lot. Plus those bases are huge, especially JBLM

    • @aaronallblacks
      @aaronallblacks 3 роки тому +1

      Yea as if Bremerton and Everett are inconsequential

  • @matthewrowley9679
    @matthewrowley9679 3 роки тому +45

    The US wouldn't bring all its forces home if it were invaded. It would bring some home but majority wouldn't come home. They would use their forces over seas to counter attack. The reserves would support the National Guard in defending the homeland.

    • @matthewblackwood9653
      @matthewblackwood9653 3 роки тому +5

      Plus Coast Guard and all of our at-home military bases.

    • @thelordofthelostbraincells
      @thelordofthelostbraincells Рік тому

      Not to mention most Americans are strapped to the teeth.
      Also gangs "could" also assist in the fight.
      I'm not sure about the gangs though

  • @gingerjake-9610
    @gingerjake-9610 3 роки тому +53

    Texans would just say hold my beer texas civilians are their own military

    • @matthewblackwood9653
      @matthewblackwood9653 3 роки тому +2

      Throw Kentucky in too. We're the ones that settled Texas!

    • @douglasjackson295
      @douglasjackson295 3 роки тому +2

      Unorganized Militia Go Brrrrrrrrrr!

    • @Hoodie403
      @Hoodie403 3 роки тому +2

      I would say the South in general.

    • @loganbrantley5195
      @loganbrantley5195 3 роки тому

      us texans like our beer cold our guns stocked locked and loaded and big boobs and if your like me some good ol homemade soul food

  • @loganlm10
    @loganlm10 3 роки тому +61

    Let’s be honest, we will tear ourselves apart before any other nation could.

    • @NyxP.
      @NyxP. 3 роки тому +5

      Truer words have never been spoken.

    • @Wendys___
      @Wendys___ 2 роки тому +2

      Unfortunately I can’t disagree with that. Sometimes I wish a foreign power can threaten to invade to create a clear enemy. This way we stop looking at each other as enemies and look towards someone else.

    • @nabawi7
      @nabawi7 2 роки тому +1

      True. America is more divided than due to politics and I fear that many Americans would rather watch their fellow Americans die if they found out which political party they support if an invasion were to happen.

    • @thelordofthelostbraincells
      @thelordofthelostbraincells Рік тому

      @@Wendys___ sometimes humans run off of chaos.

  • @mastergamer2014m
    @mastergamer2014m 3 роки тому +40

    They also didn't take into account about how many civilians would also try to protect their homeland.

    • @maryjoygelizon4268
      @maryjoygelizon4268 3 роки тому +10

      Ye the moment an invader sets foot on american soil the number of enemy combatants would go from a few million to whatever the total population of the US is

    • @James110193
      @James110193 3 роки тому +7

      There would literally be traffic going towards the landing 😂 people would be walking around selling guns and ammo

    • @joeydecker8261
      @joeydecker8261 2 роки тому

      Theyd hear the sound of Skynard playing and the rumble of LS engines coming towards them before they could step foot off the boat. The United States has enough licensed hunters to make make up the largest standing army in the world. Most of which are fairly good marksman. I've seen what the ol 7mm magnum does to a whitail at 3-400 yards it isn't pretty. It's gonna wreck the human body.

    • @thelordofthelostbraincells
      @thelordofthelostbraincells Рік тому

      I can imagine invaders going into a gangs territory and just getting shot up.

  • @pakidara2000
    @pakidara2000 3 роки тому +34

    "What happens . . . Russian tunnel . . . " Something like this happened during the American Civil War. A tunnel was dug and used to force a new flank. The response was to toss some TNT into the hole and blow it up before all the forces made it through. I expect this would be the same story.

    • @maryjoygelizon4268
      @maryjoygelizon4268 3 роки тому +4

      Except now instead of tnt its with missiles

    • @MrSkylerh
      @MrSkylerh 3 роки тому +10

      Russians pop up in Alaska.... Alaskans think they're trying to steal their gold claims and news headlines 20 years later....
      Mass Graves of Russian soldiers found across the majority of Alaska and the natives deny any knowledge of their existence.

    • @matthewblackwood9653
      @matthewblackwood9653 3 роки тому +4

      @@MrSkylerh Alaska's basically Siberia. Even 90%+ of Russians don't go to Siberia. It would be an absolute nightmare getting through Alaska even without the Alaskans shooting you.

    • @ShOCKeRpb123
      @ShOCKeRpb123 3 роки тому +2

      A tunnel is a self dug grave and bottle neck.
      You could easily find the tunnel path under the channel with ground penetrating radar and bust up the tunnel under the sea and flood it.

    • @TheDeinonychus
      @TheDeinonychus 3 роки тому +1

      Interesting aside, the first military submarine was developed and used by the south in the Civil War. It sunk due to mechanical failure but only after badly damaging one union warship and scaring the rest of the ships out of the harbor.

  • @dizzyd970
    @dizzyd970 3 роки тому +10

    That video forgot to mention the American citizen 😉. The American citizens are another army all on their own 🔥

  • @homeaccount7977
    @homeaccount7977 3 роки тому +9

    "You cannot invade mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass." - Admiral Yamamoto (The man who planned Pearl Harbor)

  • @jlondon1441
    @jlondon1441 3 роки тому +2

    Alaska, one of the most seismically active regions in the world, has tons of seismographs. They anomalies detected by the graphs would tell authorities there is a tunnel being dug before it broke ground.

  • @TippyCraft
    @TippyCraft 3 роки тому +7

    Yes a reaction to the old Red Dawn would be a great video. Totally do it!

  • @sam_dalioni
    @sam_dalioni 3 роки тому +19

    "its like saying you want to invade Rome at the Hight of their power, its practically impossible!"
    Hannibal: HOLD MY WINE!

    • @ryanmann9842
      @ryanmann9842 3 роки тому +3

      You missed one important thing. Hannibal never got Rome. He didn't have enough men to properly siege the city. Instead just sacked Italia and won the battle of canae. 60k Roman casualties.
      Afterwards just kept losing until definitive defeat at Zama by a Scipio

    • @TheDeinonychus
      @TheDeinonychus 3 роки тому +3

      @@ryanmann9842 True, but a large reason for Hannibal's defeat was he had no support from Carthage. The bulk of his forces were made up of local Ghalic tribes who had been oppressed by Rome already, and still he managed to do that much damage. It wasn't till the end of his campaign that the Carthagean leaders decided to support him, but by then Rome had finally started taking the threat of Hannibal seriously, and had organized a large enough force with a competent leader to actually oppose him.

    • @ryanmann9842
      @ryanmann9842 3 роки тому

      @@TheDeinonychus yeah.
      The format of the joke was no utilized effectively. Maybe it should've mention the alps.
      Rome: Carthage can't hit us (dominating both sea and land during second punic)
      Hannibal: "hold my wine"
      You're right about Hannibal not getting support because the leadership of the empire feared the wrath of Rome after losing thr first time. Furthermore, they no long dominated the sea (Roman's suck at navy but unironically invented the corvus, boarding bridges and proceed to slaughter crews). So when Hannibal proceeded to sack Italia the nobles/leadership realized, "OH sh*t! He's actually doing it."
      Hannibal basically did a 1 v nation with an army comprised of loyal retinue and elephant (pre-alps) from Spain he marched to Rome on land and started to recruit or encourage Guallic/Gaelic forces into joining (especially post-alps). Massalia noticed that a huge army is matching towards them. Rome scoff saying they can't pass the alps. Massalia gets hit, and enemy passes through Alps. That is when the Celtics actually joined him because northern Italy was dominated by this group and wanted freedom.
      And then the rest of my previous comment.

    • @mikhailiagacesa3406
      @mikhailiagacesa3406 3 роки тому

      Rome during the Carthaginian Wars was not at their height. Would happen centuries later under Trajan. Which is more a testament to the longevity of the Roman Republic and Empire than my historical nerdism.

    • @ryanmann9842
      @ryanmann9842 3 роки тому +1

      @@mikhailiagacesa3406 nice man. Would agree during the Roman Empire their height was during the rule of the 5 just emperors.
      High Roman Republic is somewhat hard to determine because of how influential the punic wars were. It established the Marian reforms and gave rise to Strong men. So I'll just throw a dart and say the first triumvirate was republics height

  • @brandonsherman8173
    @brandonsherman8173 3 роки тому +4

    One thing that is always left out of these videos is the fact that we have never officially banned privateers, Congress still holds the power to issue letters of marque at any point it deems it necessary.
    While this might not seem like a big deal. It should be noted in two separate wars (the American revolution and the war of 1812) American privateers actually proved more effective in disrupting British naval and trade movements than the U.S. navy ever did.

  • @drmustash9531
    @drmustash9531 3 роки тому +5

    Saw a phil robertson video where he was explaining about how during deer season only 4 of our states would be able to make the largest army in the world with how many hunters went out
    And that was only 4 we have alot more than only 4 "hunting" states so I'd say we could hold our ground pretty solidly

  • @swwwsss7870
    @swwwsss7870 3 роки тому +116

    Day 11 of “react to the attact of the dead men”

  • @sevenfourslide5035
    @sevenfourslide5035 3 роки тому +11

    You should also see "meth addict steals tank" by Qxir, it's a good video about an incident where...well, what the title says, Qxir makes good videos with good animations

  • @cesar88ml
    @cesar88ml 3 роки тому +8

    “Awkward “ XD that got me right in the funny bone

  • @carlwhite531
    @carlwhite531 3 роки тому +1

    I served in the US Army as Airborne Infantry I worked with the SAS overseas and I loved yall guys much love brother

  • @icygaming20
    @icygaming20 3 роки тому +18

    Yeah the old red dawn is fantastic lol

  • @TheREALMuad-dib
    @TheREALMuad-dib 3 роки тому +5

    The environment alone would be incredibly difficult to take, especially if small units of independent militias decided to disappear into the wilderness and fight back.

  • @cookmatthew920
    @cookmatthew920 3 роки тому +5

    Bro, that remake is like 2016 ghost busters bad..

  • @toowindy1177
    @toowindy1177 3 роки тому +2

    I cannot stop watching these videos you make! I’ve watched at least 6-7 in the last couple days! Awesome content

  • @captgaming2134
    @captgaming2134 3 роки тому +6

    The UK, in a way also tries to project global power using its navy but not in the same amount as our American brothers primarily because of the smaller military

  • @stevengayer3420
    @stevengayer3420 3 роки тому +4

    You caught me by total surprise when you said you were going to refit a bus and travel around! Keep making videos your content is amazing!

  • @Raz0rking
    @Raz0rking 3 роки тому +9

    My reaction was the the same with the "only 5 bases"

  • @jakeking974
    @jakeking974 3 роки тому +2

    As someone who lives near West Virginia, that's where I'd be. Those mountains and their roads are insanely confusing if you don't know them, and should the enemy try using the roads, most are setup that you should rain hell down on them from the hillside.

  • @swordsmaster1945
    @swordsmaster1945 3 роки тому +7

    Love your videos man, keep it up 👊

  • @baileyerickson6544
    @baileyerickson6544 3 роки тому +3

    *Me…. A normal civilian, looking at my collection of ammo/guns, plate carrier, and buckets of spent range brass* chuckles…

  • @herruvwxyz
    @herruvwxyz 3 роки тому +3

    Absolutely agree. Noone wants a nuclear war, everyone knows there can only be losers in one. Also, thanks a lot for your videos, you react to cool and interesting stuff, I will start having a look at your second channel too!

  • @briansteinmetz6866
    @briansteinmetz6866 3 роки тому +1

    You should do a video on the port system they built during WWII. They called them Mulberry Harbors. It's insanely impressive what they accomplished and without it the war wouldn't have been won. It once got hit by a crazy bad storm that basically destroyed it and it crippled the supply line to a stop for a good amount of time. You'd really enjoy learning about it.

  • @douglasjackson295
    @douglasjackson295 3 роки тому +4

    Him: People under-estimate what would happen if there was a giant cyberattack on the US
    Me: *glares at Colonial Pipeline,* Not Anymore!

  • @marksmith4892
    @marksmith4892 3 роки тому +1

    LMAO if that reaction about the red dawn remake wasn't pre-scripted then that was fucking hilarious XDDDDD 2 seconds later, we shall not speak of the remake looooooooooool

  • @kino8860
    @kino8860 3 роки тому +5

    Been watching since beggining, love to all your family and you man 🔥🔥🔥

  • @f16fightingfalcon15
    @f16fightingfalcon15 3 роки тому +2

    I heard that after D-Day, moustache man was so determined that he had made the right decision to place his forces at the incorrect beach, that he kept his forces there to try and prove that he wasn't wrong, but, of course, nobody actually invaded the beach.
    and his commanders actually begged for him to move his troops i think, it was just the determination of their leader that made the landings as effective as they were

    • @JKM395
      @JKM395 3 роки тому

      All true sir. The man was an idiot.

  • @TotallyNotNinja
    @TotallyNotNinja 3 роки тому +12

    I just say that the US let them come in we gun owners can defend ours it’s been our dream since red dawn

  • @jakeking974
    @jakeking974 3 роки тому +1

    Being invaded would be hilarious since I'm not even legally allowed to own guns in my state, BUT I have enough chemistry knowledge to make tannerite. And I imagine a lot of us are the same.

  • @justcontroll7610
    @justcontroll7610 3 роки тому +4

    Us- has a ton of military equipment and naval equipment
    US- Nah fam I need more

  • @SeaGLGaming
    @SeaGLGaming 3 роки тому +1

    Don't worry Luke, I loved the remake too. Ignore the haters! Also, if you enjoyed Red Dawn (2012), you should play Homefront and Homefront the Revolution sometime on the channel! Homefront was loosely tied into the Red Dawn remake although I believe they scrapped that idea. Homefront deals with a North Korean invasion of the US with you fighting as guerilla fighters. Homefront actually predicted Kim Jong-Il's death. Its sequel Homefront the Revolution is more of a reboot and alternate timeline where North Korea experienced an economic boom following the Korean War. The original movie also had a tie-in book titled Homefront: The Voice of Freedom and is an excellent read.

  • @BM-te9te
    @BM-te9te 3 роки тому +4

    9:30 what happens? Now they get to travel through many thousands of miles of dense forests

    • @15Med3
      @15Med3 3 роки тому

      US still have some left over napalm... basically making forests not a problem

  • @attackduck9768
    @attackduck9768 3 роки тому +1

    Whats funny is that the original video didn't even mention Hawaii. China would have to get their ships past the fleet at Pearl Harbor and.. well... this isn't the 40's anymore xD

  • @livingcorpse5664
    @livingcorpse5664 3 роки тому +3

    Video: "The sad thing is despite all the training, a war never happened."
    That's a sad thing...how? It's better to know how to fight and never need to, than need to and not know how. Also America is really only safe from foreign threats, it's kind of fucked when it comes to domestic threats since they're already here. The biggest threat to America right now is America itself.

  • @DannyHodge95
    @DannyHodge95 3 роки тому +3

    You're right about the 60s, the Vietnam war was a proxy war for the cold war (ie it was US vs commies intervening on either side).
    The 80s are most likely when films started coming out about it because that's when cinema blew up (thanks star wars), and people tend to be interested in war films after the war has ended, probably why there's very few Iraq/Afghanistan films.

  • @lilratatack6010
    @lilratatack6010 3 роки тому +3

    Well I'm really hoping that we would see them more than a mile away lol

  • @ryanweintraub9448
    @ryanweintraub9448 3 роки тому +1

    Even then with wars on our mainland, we had a submarine in the revolutionary war, "super frigates" in the 17/1800s and in the civil war we had steam powered ironclads so heck

    • @wyattguilliams9479
      @wyattguilliams9479 2 роки тому

      Honestly the Ironclands were much more successful or rather effective than the submarines at both those times

  • @danm2783
    @danm2783 3 роки тому +13

    Also , in part, the plot of the 2007 PC game "World in Conflict"

  • @aprilbiggerstaff9333
    @aprilbiggerstaff9333 2 роки тому +1

    Almost every household has at least one gun

  • @jimparis5073
    @jimparis5073 3 роки тому +7

    Russia: THE ONE WITH THE RIFLE SHOOTS!
    America: you want another gun dude I have far too many right now

    • @devinshort8150
      @devinshort8150 3 роки тому

      Too many? Such a thing does not exist, only not enough space for the lovelies haha

  • @davemi3213
    @davemi3213 3 роки тому +1

    Apon finding an invasion is eminent the American citizens would provide a protection force of millions of volunteers

  • @stuartlarge6296
    @stuartlarge6296 3 роки тому +3

    You should react to "McNamara's Morons" from the vietnam war. It was kinda messed up.

  • @chadparsons9954
    @chadparsons9954 3 роки тому +1

    Everybody always underestimates the American citizen, dude, we will rob a burger joint armed with an alligator.

  • @xS1leNtRapt0rZ
    @xS1leNtRapt0rZ 3 роки тому +3

    World in conflict is a fantastic game

  • @michaelmarrone2784
    @michaelmarrone2784 3 роки тому

    Welcome to the USA! Happy to have you and hope as one American to another you enjoy it, it’s an amazing place!!

  • @jaygirdwood4639
    @jaygirdwood4639 3 роки тому +7

    Can you react to “computer bug that was 7 minutes away from launching a nuke” by the infographics show

  • @fazzfoodjoint5380
    @fazzfoodjoint5380 3 роки тому +1

    We in America don't speak of the remake

  • @Eddies_Channel
    @Eddies_Channel 3 роки тому +3

    Damn UA-cam forgot to put the k after your like number

  • @TheDeinonychus
    @TheDeinonychus 3 роки тому +2

    Even if, hypothetically, an enemy military could get a foothold on mainland US and defeat the US military, they'd never be able to actually hold the country. There was reportedly a debate among Japanese generals during WW2 about the possibility of a large-scale invasion of the US mainland. They decided that even if it was possible to make landfall, there would be a rifle hiding being every bush waiting for them. Militias and an armed population would make any occupation of the US so costly it just wouldn't be worth the attempt. Of course, that's not to say things haven't changed since then, what with certain group wanting to restrict gun ownership more and more, but you still have a very large portion of the population armed in the US. Not even taking into account an armed police force who could be drafted into a defense as well.

  • @timurlane4004
    @timurlane4004 3 роки тому +6

    Hi there mate. Really enjoying your content, but it seems you are really interested in cold War, you should watch oversimplified cold War . Its so good . And yes from 1949 to 1989 the US had big fear from USSR. So PLEASE watch oversimplified COLD WAR. Okay bye now

  • @julieenslow5915
    @julieenslow5915 3 роки тому +2

    " Or they could be using South America...well out of range of most American bombers."
    Except the B-52 Stratofortress which could do the whole trip without refueling from their home base in the US. True, we don't have that many now, less than 100. But do you know what 100 of those can do? And go back again the next day, and the next....

    • @denisegroce7135
      @denisegroce7135 2 роки тому

      The B-2 is long range as well.

    • @julieenslow5915
      @julieenslow5915 2 роки тому

      @@denisegroce7135
      True. I've read that the B-52s (the older of the two aircraft) could take off from it's base in the US, fly to the middle east, deliver it's load and fly back without landing. (or refueling?) Whatever the fact - the B-52 has extreme range. It makes sense they would try to make the B-2 which was supposed to replace it perform as well.

  • @haimnavachov8601
    @haimnavachov8601 3 роки тому +4

    can you react to Six-Day War (1967) - Third Arab-Israeli War DOCUMENTARY from Kings and Generals

  • @Gifkrigiroorigifif
    @Gifkrigiroorigifif 3 роки тому

    That warpath ad was intense🤣only ad I’ve ever stuck around to see

  • @jetskii7000
    @jetskii7000 3 роки тому +6

    Day 4 of “luke please play ghost recon future soldier”

  • @mateohernandez2745
    @mateohernandez2745 3 роки тому +1

    Respect for the daily uploads ✊ 💖

  • @TheDavcrz5
    @TheDavcrz5 3 роки тому +3

    Just to give you understanding of armed civil population there are more than 393 million civilian-owned firearms in the United States, or enough for every man, woman and child to own one and still have 67 million guns left over. The USA would have worlds largest Civil militia with millions of former military personnel in these militia to augment US Miltary Ground forces Army and Marine Corp. It would be most heavily armed civil militia in history including assault rife, hunting rifles, shotguns and hand even 50 cal. Weapons Bring on LOL.

  • @SaintGabriel11
    @SaintGabriel11 3 роки тому

    Dude....... That D&D hat is freaking rad!!! Going to add your other channel, good luck on your family project!

  • @TheGraveyardGhost
    @TheGraveyardGhost 3 роки тому +9

    React to the other over simplified videos

  • @kevin_s_03_
    @kevin_s_03_ 3 роки тому

    As a West Virginian all I would say is good luck with my tree line stocked up with Tanerite and a 30-06

  • @nvasoldier6893
    @nvasoldier6893 3 роки тому +5

    day 4 of "OH please react to attack of dead men"

    • @robpo4
      @robpo4 3 роки тому

      100% this

  • @ndguam
    @ndguam 3 роки тому +1

    Not everyone was worried (afraid) of an invasion by Russian troops in the 80’s. As for guns and the reason there are so many, they are part of the foundation that is our freedom. Is is also said that Admiral Yamamoto suggested to not invade the U.S. mainland because, “there is a gun behind every blade of grass”.

  • @Porky-pig
    @Porky-pig 3 роки тому +7

    Hi Luke I would really like you to react to (the star spangled banner like you’ve never heard it before). It explains the lyrics of our National anthem.

  • @jacobwray2933
    @jacobwray2933 3 роки тому

    The person narrating the infographics show would be a great military leader from all his research on wars and other military related videos like this

  • @GhostEye31
    @GhostEye31 3 роки тому +6

    As a caveat to the idea of nuclear war is also the use of a nuke as an EMP. A few set off strategically could put the US back into the 1800s.

    • @falkwulf3842
      @falkwulf3842 3 роки тому +1

      you are correct, However that still would not stop the 393 million guns in the hands of private citizens.

    • @GhostEye31
      @GhostEye31 3 роки тому

      @@falkwulf3842 The guns will just end up being used on other Americans, an EMP attack wouldn't even need a followup invasion to completely destroy the US as it is today. Food scarcity, and a lack of clean water would do the rest. Tens of millions would die.

    • @falkwulf3842
      @falkwulf3842 3 роки тому

      @@GhostEye31 In the cities it would be BAD. However you forget that there are literally MILLIONS of Americans who dont live in the cities. In FLYOVER country people still have the skills to be self sufficient. Farming, Hunting, Fishing. People out in flyover country still have the skills that city dwellers forgot about. Sure the lights would go out, for a short while. Within 3 years the US would be back up and running like normal again. Coal, and Oil fired powerplants would spring back to life within the first year. What you call the 1800's in reality would be more like the 1940's when most things in the US were NOT interconnected.

  • @spkon6049
    @spkon6049 3 роки тому

    Fun fact about the remake. The guy that was hit by the truck driven by Chris, the stunt double was supposed to be hit in the front but missed and hit the side of the vehicle. They kept the mistake take.

  • @peanutbutterman411
    @peanutbutterman411 3 роки тому +4

    Will wouldn’t Russia be safe from America too because they have to cross a huge ocean or go into Siberia? and Russia is known to fight good in snow and cold weather.

  • @N1ghtF4ll3r
    @N1ghtF4ll3r 3 роки тому +1

    Crazy how he said cyberattacks are the biggest thing and rn with this gas crisis

  • @LoinkLoink
    @LoinkLoink 3 роки тому +1

    Funny enough, it was the US's geography that was a huge reason why the original colonists were able to fend off Britain's military. The colonists were fighting on home soil and constantly on the move while in some cases the British had to sail all the way back to Britain to get orders on how to retaliate against them, which would take entire months.

  • @TumanaterT
    @TumanaterT 3 роки тому

    You're awesome man!!! Keep up the good work and have a great day broskee!!