Is that common? Why did she only get six years for killing that man? The judge said there wasn’t even proof of her intentions? She chased him down across traffic, going over 90, to only hit him on his motorcycle.. it doesn’t make sense
If she isn't that person, maybe hard labor and a stint in the mental hospital will help! No no! We can't give people hard labor cause they are the victims! Daddy issues or substance abuse! I don't see how TV, education and courtyard time is rehabilitation!
Ya ignore the fools in here with huge chips on their shoulders, there simply wasn’t evidence that it was intentional. People chase each other all the time during road rage incidents and most don’t end in death and both eventually go their separate ways. I very much doubt she was trying to kill him.
In Denmark the punishment are less than. 4 months, but in severe cases, up to 8 years. Never heard about anyone getting that. Danish judges are either corrupt, stupid or big softies on criminals.
She has the nerve to cry for getting 6 years after you murdered someone. People get more time for an ounce of weed. The injustice system is really working overtime.
She wasn't charged for hitting her kids, cutting people in line, being a horrendous coworker, not tipping, spreading lies and gossip, having screaming fits, giving dirty looks to other races, always wanting her way, the other road rage instances that didn't end in a death. You don't do all of this and then one day run someone over. It's not an isolated event.
@@Canuck_Retro_Gaming I don't know if gender discrimination is necessarily the issue. I guess what I'm upset about is that a sober person could get six years for killing another human being. I don't really even give a shit about her reaaction either, I'm just amazed that the court would let someone off so easy for what seems like a deliberate attempt to cause harm.
I encountered a clown in Louisiana who killed 2 people in a DUI crash who whined because he got 3 years of prison and 3 of probation!!!! He killed TWO PEOPLE! 3 YEARS PER LIFE!!!!!!!!! WTF??????
@@chrisbattaglia1436 Read comment above. I’d just hang them all regardless but some places don’t have strict and harsh enough laws period, regardless of gender.
Yeah she should've gotten more but she still has to be in prison for 6 years do you know how long that is? I would be crying even if I had to do 1 year fr prison is scary
you chase someone down and killed him. 6 years in prison.... wtf Why she crying? That's a good deal. You deprived a man of at lest 55 years, while you just get to be uncomfortable for 6 years..... this isn't justice
Mr Corky accident? She was tail gating him the whole time when she didn’t need to provoke the rage to go any further, she obviously could have a avoided this and kept his life but instead she didn’t, she definitely deserves more than this
EXACTLY. BULLS. 👀 THAT. PIECE. OF. 💩 SHOULD. OF. GOTTEN. WAY. MORE. THAN. SIX. YEARS. IN. PRISON. 93. MPH. SHE. DESERVES. A. LOT. MORE. TIME. IN. PRISON. LIKE. A. LIFE. SENTENCE. !!
...there wasn't enough evidence to prove it was intentional... I bet if the chief had a relative that was a judge there would be enough evidence. That judge should be removed and lose his law license. Justice is blind, not stupid!
@@eddarby469 Many of these court cases are fucking retarded as shit. He booted the side of her vehicle and took off but you shouldn't be speeding excessively at 95+mph i think that is 25mph over the limit
The back story is that he kicked her car and then sped off. A witness in the trial confirmed this exchange. The defense claimed that she sped after him to get his license plate information. So it's not that cut and dry of a case.
@@Exxtol1 It actually IS that cut and dry.... someone kicks your car and your entitled to wrecklessly Chase them - putting others at risk - at 80 mph? Kinda simple when you think about it.....
@Salman Javaid so what are the charges then genius? Its more than coughing lmfao u better go watch again the main and biggest charge starts with a R and ends with a y. U dipshit 😂✌
@Salman Javaid must be a foreigner lol learn to type. So ur quitting? Awwwww Lmao what a loser. Anyone reading this is gonna see how stupid u are better start deleting 😂 attempted robbery, assault and he got peppersprayed. Since u watched it dipshit have a good one 😘✌
@Salman Javaid odd u wanted to argue at first but ok as long as uve accepted defeat. and the barking u might be hearing is comming from ur moms room might wanna tell her to settle down dont need her making more idiots like u 😉
@@edgarjacc796 so your logic in life: if they know more, they’re always right. So that means you stand behind judges who sentence pedophiles to only probation after they rape children. I’m not here for your validation, but thanks for showing the world how ignorant you are.
You'd think After such a chase down It would be considered "freakin' Voluntary therefore MURDER! Idiot judges sometimes! They sound voluntarily STUPID!
@norcalandrew Thats gotta be proven. When they cannot prove she did it intentionally and she denies it, case fails. So she get 6 years for manslaughter. So if we were to say she did it intentionally and it cannot be proven in court, what then? Should the court then "believe" someting that we think is likely? No, we can believe stuff, but court needs evidence. Police fault then. They shoulda done a better job and brought evidence to the court. Thats the police officers job.
@Grey Goose I value my own life. If you take that away from somebody then you're taking away everything kinda. Id call that significant. If someone killed you would that matter to you forever after that?
My nephew spent 8 years in a Florida prison for having "drugs" (marijuana) on him bc he was in the proximity of a school that he knew nothing about and bitch runs down a soldier, murders him, and gets 6 years. Yeah that sounds about right!🙄
Life sentence hell, why should she live have contact with family and friends. His family visits will be to a cold piece of land to look at a tombstone, that's where her family should be visiting her.
There's criteria that needs to be met for murder, and this wasn't it. It's not the judge's fault, it's the way the law is written. Her sentence isn't all that light for a road rage crime. If you don't like it, then run for Congress and change the law.
+The Tribulation With all due respect, how does this case prove that white men are demonized? There's no mention of race in the story, or hatred for the dead dude.
@@deepsleep7822 her intention could be different if he was alive . But she savagely killed him already . And even his own family couldnt recognise him. What more do you want to say idiot
Precisely! If deliberately chasing someone along the highway and then deliberately ramming them isn't premeditated, I don't know what is. Her flying into an idiotic rage wasn't premeditated, but by the time she ran him down it had become premeditated. She should have gotten 60 years, not 6, for first-degree murder.
That's not what he said. Rather he stated there wasn't enough evidence to prove the crime was intentional. Meaning he decided evidence was insufficient-not beyond a reasonable doubt-to prove the defendant guilty to the fullest extent of the penalties on all charges. So, guilt couldn't be proven to such a degree that her ultimate intent was to murder the victim. Obviously there was intent, it existed of course - but to what degree and for what purpose specifically? That's what it comes down to, at the sentencing hearing.
@@E4Sierra Without question almost any outcome in a court of law rests squarely on the discretion of the judge. This particular case was NOT the exception. She was charged, convicted, and sentenced of the crime in question; so we get to sentencing. Here's were most rational people restle with a 6 year extent given under 'intent' or lack there of.
*IT WAS INTENTIONAL !!!* She intended to kill that young man, it is a great loss to the family and his country. It cost a lot of time and a lot money to train a navy officer. *IT WAS INTENTIONAL !!!*
6 years in prison for running over a marine man? White privilege, female privilege. If it was a cop she woukd have gotten more time. All of you military people, Americs values cops more than your lives.
@@lior995 You can't prove it was an intentional crime though. For all you know, she chased him to force him to stop so she could get out and scream at him
They charged her with "manslaughter" which is legally defined as being accidentally responsible. As if her chasing down someone going 90 mph was just an oopsie.
@Imariuz adequate provocation would be him posing an ordinary physical threat (threat of minor to moderate bodily harm.) She was in no danger of any kind of bodily harm in this exchange.
@Imariuz Voluntary Manslaughter is intentionally harming someone which leads to their death. 2nd degree is almost impossible to prove here as they're is no way to prove she wanted to kill him instead of saying she just wanted to harm in a fit of rage but he ended up dying.
People have received sentences of 10-14 years for simple possession of pot and she gets 6 years-probably 3 for4 good behaviour- for killing an innocent person.
6 years? What is wrong with that judge? 6 years for a lost life? Hopefully she gets a little something more in prison. Maybe she’s have a fit of rage there that will actually land her serious time. This is disgusting.
The man who deliberately drove into my cousin's car, killing her two infant daughters, got a piddling little fine. Sometimes justice just isn't metered out fairly.
@CornishRicky she can just move to a different area of California or the US and start over again. 6 years for chasing someone across 4 freeways and striking them at over 80 miles per hour. All of this over a passenger side mirror. $100 piece of equipment is worth a man's life. The judge also needs to be removed from the bench.
@@jen9774 that is so heartbreaking… we had a family friend who was murdered during his job as a gas station cashier by a robber. the police never found the guy, I doubt they really even tried to find the killer.
That judge needs to be evaluated. You hit someone at 96 miles an hour and the judge couldnt say it was intentional or not 😦. Bro at a minimum it should've been 15
Womans normally get it ezz, just a few weeks ago a drunk woman that killed another womans just married husband and her unborn baby got 12, and dont forget that they normally get release in 1/4 of the time due to clemency
I think if that happened over here in the uk, I’m pretty sure she would got more as we calculated the speed over the speed limits, the cost of life, the road rage offence will be added, she would have a lot more that that. And now the government just passed a law if a nurse, police constable, EMT or military will get life
What am I not getting? Darla Jackson willfully and deliberately chased him down at a reckless high rate of speed, and could have caused an accident with other motorists. Upon reaching him she actually hit him and killed him. So why is this lunatic sobbing because she only got a DESPICABLE 6 years in prison ? And even worse is if she eligible for early release and then on parole. This creature should have gotten life in prison or a minimum of 50 years for this. What the heck else is this judge needing ? He should have his head examined or be removed from the bench. This is one reason why criminals often laugh about their crimes when being sentenced- because for many the punishment is not hard and long enough. This is completely awful !!
They didn't pay the judge anything. It's California. The judge gave her what he could. Society is lucky she didn't get probation -- which is more often the case in vehicular homicide cases here.
WTF, she's crying croc tears because the judge served her with 6 years?! That's outrageous; she intentionally killed that man. The least she should have gotten was 20 years minimum.
She took a life with a deadly weapon... that's life in prison with probably off parole after 30 years. 6 years is a slap on the wrist and an insult to the Petty Officer's family.
@@paulinarittscher215 Technically it is vehicular homicide. But the prosecution would have to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt. That it was intentional which is hard.
And in the end she may only serve only 2-3 years. Get out on parole for "good behavior". The majority of these cases do not serve the full time ordered by the judge.
She's crying over 6 years like it was a life sentence which in this case might actually be fair. Really, she should be grateful that she got off so easy for taking a life.
If I was the family I’d take out that b*tch myself the moment she’s out of prison, especially for not even apologizing in court and only trying to make herself look like the victim here. Oh you wanna be a victim, girl? Yeah I’ll make you one. She MURDERED him
dbsill cockney He simply stated that he believes she was only remorseful over the fact that she has to go to prison. I'm not sure why you found the comment so confusing. It was pretty simple for me to understand.
"There was not enough evidence to prove the crime was intentional"... literally wtf. She was speeding in excess of 90 mph, she followed him across several lanes of traffic and rammed into him hard enough that he was launched over 300 feet? How does all of that NOT show intent? She deserved way worse than what she got. She killed a man. So incredibly sad for his family.
Exactly that is premeditation right there. But she is a woman, so she gets an light sentence. A man molests a kid - he goes to prison (which he should). A woman molests a kid - no prison, and only house arrest. Like wtf?
I think jail sentences should be the same across-the-board all over the country. The U.S. should not leave it to the disgression of an individual judge.
@@jonnyhqwest8506 she murdered him huh? did you read what happened? it was a douche bag on a motorcycle who kicked her car and pulled out in front of her and slowed down. she was tailgating him and got too close. play stupid games wins stupid prizes.
Disgusting. Back in 2015 a guy in Denver received a 160 yr sentence for a car chase. There was a baby in one of the cars he stole, but he didn't kill anyone. This sick person chases down a man and murders him and she only gets 6 YEARS?!!!! We have some really stupid judges. I hope karma catches up to her.
So, if someone is drunk and runs over a pedestrian, he's given 50 years in prision, even if it was an accident, because he was drunk. But if u are sober, and you chase a biker and run him over intentionally, you are given 6 years.... i dont understand.
I did some research as to why this happens, but do not take it at face value, I am not an attorney. It depends on the state the crime was committed in, but if we are talking California then the sentences can vary wildly as they look at the individual's criminal record, level of intoxication, circumstances surrounding the crime and many more factors can come into play when prosecuting them. Like repeat offenders get a harsher sentence than a first time offender, obviously. I'm not saying this Karen got the appropriate sentence, but since there was no (substantial) evidence other than eye witnesses i assume, they couldn't charge her with aggravated assault. If they would have, she might have gotten out scot free due to a mistrial. This is cause eye witnesses are solely used to established facts, and not taken at face value anymore. Of course this is just speculation cause I haven't reviewed this case, but it is how I think it went down
"A mistake"? Nope. When you are sent to the store to buy hot dog buns and you come home with hamburger buns instead...that's a mistake. When you go 80 plus miles an hour to run into someone because you are so angry that you cannot control your temper that is NOT a mistake. I think she should have been charged with murder!
Absolutely - I like the way you think. Who was she trying to run over that by mistake she ran over this man instead? It was no mistake. It was her intention.
Oh so the fact that the navy guy road raged and kicked her car, damaging it, then RAN is completely ignored. So her wanting to catch the guy who just kicked her car and ran away because he knew he would get fined and possible jail time if caught, this makes her a murderer? Something else to consider, they make it out like she dragged the guy for miles. It was 300 feet at 80 mph. Thats not very far at all. Im sorry, I feel bad for the guy dieing but this was his fault. This is todays motorcyclists attitudes. you piss me off, I take out your mirror. It wrong, its illegal and it should never happen under any circumstances ever. Dont get me wrong, she had some blame in this to but Im not sure it was cut and dry road rage on her part. This should be a lesson to motorcyclists everywhere. road rage and possibly lose your life. You know whats ironic here. If the guy had lived and been severely disabled after this, This woman probably would not have gotten any jail time because of him road raging and damaging her car in the first place. Sorry, I have little pity for motorcyclists that do this kind of thing.
Darren Cole - There were 1,000 other motorists on the road, and not one of them behaved the way this woman did. SHE is responsible for her actions. I'm 65 and I've been driving - in several countries - since I was a teenager. You can bet I've encountered plenty of idiot drivers. Yet I never felt I had any right to chase after anybody and run them down. We live in a civil society and just as you expect other people to behave morally, they expect you to behave morally as well.
Darren Cole - Also, you think 300 feet is "not very far at all?" It's the length of a football field. This weekend, take your girlfriend to a football field, ask her to lay down at the goal line and then drag her the whole length of the field. See if she thinks that 300 feet is "not very far at all."
Darren Cole Do you ride? I do. Pay no attention to motorcycles like a lot of drivers do and you might get your car kicked or mirror smashed. I take it you have never been on a bike honking your horn as some ass hat swerves into your lane when your along side them with no where to go. Ya, she got mad. SHE chased him. SHE hit him and pushed him and his bike 300 feet down the highway at 80mph BEFORE he crashed. If he did something to her car then she needs to call the police. She didn't. SHE CHOSE to run him down a d kill him. She's a killer!! Nothing more. Nothing less.
"A mistake is when you step on somebody's foot at the family reunion. A MISTAKE is when you ask a lady when the baby's due and she's not pregnant." This was not a mistake.
True. Wouldn't have been "voluntary manslaughter" that's for sure. Would have likely been 2nd degree murder - "killing either be intentional or reckless, and occur in the spur of the moment"
Stillman In Motion it’s literally been statistically proven that African Americans get sentenced to 20-30% longer sentences compared to other ethnicities for the same crimes. Just because you don’t hear about it, doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen, man.
It's really dumb. Here in the UK - quite a soft touch place - she would have got 10-12+ years and almost certainly a lifetime ban on holding a driving licence.
probably she had no priors and she had like a scholarship?was working etc a stable home all these factors help and her gender let's not forget that one.
At least her family can still see her albeit behind bars and hug her when she is released. What about the gentleman's family; she has robbed them of the luxury of talking to, hugging and spending time with him. There will aways be something missing in their beings, their lives; an emptiness.
6 years that's too lenient, she took away a life that should carry a minimum of 25 years not 6 years. She intended to cause harm . Prosecution should appeal for harsher sentence
Prosecutors can't appeal, you can't be tried or convicted for the same crime twice, 6 years is a damn joke but manslaughter is the lowest form of homicide and there are limitations for how long a judge can sentence a defendant
Double jeopardy is legal. It's included in and guaranteed by the fifth amendment. And prosecutors can appeal. Sentencing and conviction are not the same. Conviction is the determination of guilt. Sentencing is the punishment dispensed upon a guilty verdict. In the same way that a person found guilty can appeal their sentence and ask for a reduction based on legal grounds. Prosecutors can appeal and ask for a harsher sentence based on legal grounds. There is no trial in a sentencing appeal but simply a hearing. The person's guilt or innocence isn't in question. Only whether or not the punishment was adequate. And either side can appeal the sentence. It's rare that the prosecution appeals, but it does happen occasionally. Information about the fifth amendment, double jeopardy and prosecutorial appeals are easy to find in a google search or your local library. So you don't have to take my word for it.
@@rolandkennedy80 lmao. Dude you're a nameless, faceless keyboard warrior. People actually have to care what you think before you can upset them. And since you clearly have no idea what you are talking about. I care even less about your opinion. But thanks for the laugh. Trolls always amuse me.
Jimmy Chitwood Not every person thinks rationally and thinks things through. She doesn't look like like she wanted to kill him. She probably underestimated the Speed and crashed him. Otherwise she would've left the scene after hitting him.
its because they had no evidence therefore its not true and was all based on testimony that cant be taken seriously because people were too far away for the law to take those statements at face value
People (men that is) are often using the defense of "I didn't mean to kill him" after they repeatedly have kicked and jumped on some poor victims head. Sometimes the court agrees.
Watched this moments before, is why was shocked: ua-cam.com/video/y1R5q3iz5jU/v-deo.html I know it was kids and two of them, but half a century is still a lot for a mistake on a road, and the guy admitted his guilt and was sorry. By that logic this girl should get at least 25 years, certainly not 6.
6 years ? This is shameful. What is wrong with the judge ? From the description of the event This woman was gunning for this man and acted with extreme malice and intent.
Green I'm African from Africa. thanks God here it's not criminals like USA. we live peace, I'm not racist OK I love very everybody just saying cuz white are racist.
Always. This was just one more incident of a life of committing minor and major social infractions as a social predator along the way. Usually, no one just starts at the summit of murder and kills; you climb small upward from the base accumulating hassle toward all. Killing was her reaching the summit. That's her; a typical social predator. That was her encore.
@@Schimml0rd Yup. Female privilege. She's been getting away with things her entire life and now she's shocked she has to be responsible for her actions.
totalba69 California has a 3 strikes law which requires mandatory jail time if you violate the law 3 times. Weed is a common crime that counts as one of those strikes
totalba69 lol you never seen a California court room have you. We are famous for doing harsh punishment for minor crimes. Once this dude stole $134 of dvds and got 50 years of jail that's $50,000 per year paid by the tax payers or $5,000,000 cause some black person stole less then $200 of stuff.
Jaco, how do you know she ran him down ? I did not hear any witness say that . Only the lawyer paid to get her said that. And this video cuts off her statement . Ask yourself why they do that
Nice Blonde Girl This was a finding of fact by the Court. Driving 80+ mph, crossing 3 lanes of traffic in relentless pursuit, then hitting the deceased and pushing him 300 yds sounds downright accidental - only to the perpetrator’s mother.
Jaco gee why was she going 80mph I wonder? Oh because that’s how fast the guy on the bike who kicked her car was going as he was fleeing the accident he caused. Crossing 3 lanes of traffic you say? Gee that’s because the guy on the bike fleeing the accident he caused was driving recklessly all over the highway to avoid having to pay damages to her car. Then she hit him? Gee Guess you shouldn’t brake check cars you just hit doing 60mph while you’re riding a motorcycle Too bad he’s dead to learn anything from it.
@ i respect your opinion, mine looks like second degree murder or voluntary manslaughter, my interpretation of the penalties, however you look at it, she was as they say " bat-shit" crazy
Road rage is real. I was once chased a good mile for making an obscene gesture at someone who cut me off and nearly sideswiped me. I'll NEVER make that mistake again. But in the hands of someone irate, a car becomes a deadly weapon. And my dad rode motorcycles. I always give them a wide road gap because I know how vulnerable a rider can be. That woman got off very cheaply and bawled about it. No shame.
+Sam Worth so you mean to say that someone crossing all four lanes of traffic and driving 80+ mph while following the person had no ill intentions? Most sane people let it go. I truly think those that have road rage are loose in the mind.
She literally chased him down across a four lane highway, once getting close enough, accelerates and intentionally hit him, and there isn't enough evidence??? Can someone explain, maybe I'm missing something, but her actions were everything but unintentional. At this point, wtf does justice even mean, cause we don't seem to be living up to that??🤦🏾♀️ 6 years is a slap in the face, it's disgusting.
@How Why Premeditated is her making the conscious choice to chase this man down and ram into him at 90 mph. While he was on a motorcycle and she was in a large car. That was thought and deliberation. "Premeditation" doesn't mean she spent 5-7 business days deciding she was gonna kill stranger who cut her off. Premeditated murder can be and has been murder decided upon in a matter of minutes. The second she made the (sober, sound minded, and deliberate) choice to CHASE SOMEONE across two freeways and four lanes of traffic, it stopped being a 'heat of the moment" reaction. Not only does your weird comparison not make any sense (if someone hits you, they're an agressor who is also breaking the law. NOT the same as someone passively cutting you off in traffic wtf??) If someone punches you in the face and walks away and you grab a shovel and chase them down four city blocks to murder them, how tf is that a "crime of passion"? You seem to just be making up neat and tidy nonsensical hypotheticals in your head like they'd appear on a fictional crime show.
@How Why Premeditation is when an individual contemplates, for any length of time, undertaking an activity and then subsequently takes the action. It can be as short as, a few seconds, deciding to pick up a hammer to hit someone. First-degree murder is decided by the state, but it's usually the intentional killing of another person by someone who has acted willfully, deliberately, or with planning. She deliberately hit him with that car. You could argue she didn't think it would kill him, but that's really hard to believe since the victim was on a motorcycle. I am pretty sure the prosecutors just wanted to get a conviction they knew would 100% stick.
@How Why 😰 You "study law" and don't even know the most basic definitions of manslaughter and the degrees of murder.... I weep. PLEASE even if you don't have access to actual law books, Google is free and it's there to help you. So you don't spout incorrect "facts" like this again and embarrass yourself in front of strangers.
6 years is a middle finger to her family. An unfair sentence causes great pain and suffering for all the victims family. To produce the minimal pain and suffering for all people, a long sentence should be given to the criminals. And in this case it should be a life sentence.
It's the motorcyclist who had the road rage. He kicked her car. He provoked the woman for likely no good reason and didn't stop and have a normal conversation like a man. Now he's dead, and he's about 90% responsible for his own death. PS I'm a motorcyclist.
6 years? throw the damn judge in jail too
Pussypass
Agree,,,, that judge deserve jail
Is that common? Why did she only get six years for killing that man? The judge said there wasn’t even proof of her intentions? She chased him down across traffic, going over 90, to only hit him on his motorcycle.. it doesn’t make sense
Yeap big time
@@joseochoa7043 Dude, it's called Female Privilege
In gynocentric society, women can get away with anything
“I’m not that person”
You are. You killed him. You got away with it. 6 years is nothing. You stole that man’s WHOLE LIFE.
Her face is public
6 years.. she should be jumping for joy .. ridiculous
If she isn't that person, maybe hard labor and a stint in the mental hospital will help! No no! We can't give people hard labor cause they are the victims! Daddy issues or substance abuse! I don't see how TV, education and courtyard time is rehabilitation!
@@javienelmore3182 That would be fair judgement. Not this 6 year crap for ending someone's life out of pure anger.
@Bob Martin exactly
How the hell did she get 6 years?? That’s straight up murder.
Equality....
Female Latina privilege. A white man or black man both would’ve gotten 20+ years for this crime and been charged with murder 2 instead of manslaughter
"how the hell did SHE"....your answer is in those 5 words
They say in video that there wasn't enough evidence that it was intentional murder
Ya ignore the fools in here with huge chips on their shoulders, there simply wasn’t evidence that it was intentional. People chase each other all the time during road rage incidents and most don’t end in death and both eventually go their separate ways. I very much doubt she was trying to kill him.
If a man did that, he’d be looking at 25 years minimum.
That is not justice. Hearing she only got 6 years is painful. That man could lived another 50 years.
And his family is have to live with his loss for the rest of their lives, 6 years and out in 3 years maybe.. definately not fair.
She would've deserved 6 years if it had been unintentional. But to deliberately hit someone with a car and receive only 6 years?
Right and the way she’s sobbing embarrassingly proves she has no remorse for her victim! Just sorry for herself!
And this happened four years ago so she's probably already out of prison. That family did not get Justice and neither did our soldier
@@jerryyoungs9534 People shouldn't expect true justice in liberal and lenient California !!!
She‘s not remorseful for killing him. She’s just crying because she got 6 years. Which is nothing for the crime she commited
@Brilliant MindZ
What's that supposed to mean?
@Brilliant MindZ
Sorry to hear that.
She is crying because it works. And in this case it worked too.
In Denmark the punishment are less than. 4 months, but in severe cases, up to 8 years. Never heard about anyone getting that. Danish judges are either corrupt, stupid or big softies on criminals.
I was gonna like this comment buuut
She has the nerve to cry for getting 6 years after you murdered someone. People get more time for an ounce of weed. The injustice system is really working overtime.
Should get life in prison for intentional killing. She can rage at the jail guards now!!!
This woman has probably never been held accountable once in her life for her actions…she should have gotten life
Only if you have a vagina.
I was expecting 20 years when I clicked on this. 6 is amazing.
@@avmaxmus6381 😅
6 years for killing someone that makes no sense
DISGRACEFUL!
That’s MURDER!
She should get life for 1st degree murder. A car is a deadly weapon.
The judge should be sentenced to life too
She killed someone and she's crying about getting 6 years, give me a damn break
Yeah, thought she would get like 20 years or so.
Yup 👍
She's sorry she had to go to jail
@AAA Logic genius ( not sarcasm)
She wasn't charged for hitting her kids, cutting people in line, being a horrendous coworker, not tipping, spreading lies and gossip, having screaming fits, giving dirty looks to other races, always wanting her way, the other road rage instances that didn't end in a death. You don't do all of this and then one day run someone over. It's not an isolated event.
6 years for intentionally killing someone? That judge should be disbarred!
It's not the judge, it's the charges brought by the D.A.
its only 1-2 years in prison in Sweden
That judge is a simp. He’s not a man..just some white knight pos
@@Denarge
Well, in fairness, the criminal justice systems in Sweden and The UK are an absolute joke.
@@ddebenedictis
Judge has discretion on sentencing. Unfortunately, some choose not to use it.
She's crying over SIX YEARS? They need to add a zero to that. Not nearly enough.
Wiedergeboren did he stutter?
Which is really only 3 years if she stays out of trouble.
This is california though, right? They don't care what you do.
She's crying about being locked up for 6 years yet the guy that died will NEVER get to do anything agian. I disagree they need to add more then a year
2 zeroes
Only Six Years ? THATS A DISGRACE … SHE DESERVES MANY MORE YEARS !!!!!!
6 years is the lightest sentence I have ever seen for non-intoxicated road rage. No drugs, no alcohol, just blind anger. 6 years.
@@Canuck_Retro_Gaming I don't know if gender discrimination is necessarily the issue. I guess what I'm upset about is that a sober person could get six years for killing another human being. I don't really even give a shit about her reaaction either, I'm just amazed that the court would let someone off so easy for what seems like a deliberate attempt to cause harm.
I encountered a clown in Louisiana who killed 2 people in a DUI crash who whined because he got 3 years of prison and 3 of probation!!!! He killed TWO PEOPLE! 3 YEARS PER LIFE!!!!!!!!! WTF??????
Oh but women are being so oppressed. If it was a man easy thirty years
Their was a case in syracuse where a DA killed someone while driving and got 2 year sentence and only did 8 months..
@@chrisbattaglia1436
Read comment above. I’d just hang them all regardless but some places don’t have strict and harsh enough laws period, regardless of gender.
Why is she crying? She got literally 6 years when it should’ve been way more
Perhaps she hoped for 5 years.
She should have gotten LIFE behind bars!
6 years is long but she would have been fine. She’s weak lmao
dat female privilege
Yeah she should've gotten more but she still has to be in prison for 6 years do you know how long that is? I would be crying even if I had to do 1 year fr prison is scary
you chase someone down and killed him. 6 years in prison.... wtf
Why she crying? That's a good deal. You deprived a man of at lest 55 years, while you just get to be uncomfortable for 6 years..... this isn't justice
Jason ......That is EXACTLY what i said
Jason thats manslaughter not murder though thats why its so low. The law.is retarded.
If you cant prove intention then its going to.be manslaughter
Jason he kicked her car first tho and hitting him running him over was an accident. These charges seem too severe.
Mr Corky accident? She was tail gating him the whole time when she didn’t need to provoke the rage to go any further, she obviously could have a avoided this and kept his life but instead she didn’t, she definitely deserves more than this
Six Years ? WTF!!
6 years ? Road rage is NOT involuntary manslaughter. 93 mph is not a mistake.
she may be the daughter of Hot Shot
EXACTLY. BULLS. 👀 THAT. PIECE. OF. 💩 SHOULD. OF. GOTTEN. WAY. MORE. THAN. SIX. YEARS. IN. PRISON. 93. MPH. SHE. DESERVES. A. LOT. MORE. TIME. IN. PRISON. LIKE. A. LIFE. SENTENCE. !!
SHE. REALLY. THINKS. SHE. WASN'T. GOING. TO. GET. NO. TIME. IN. PRISON. BECAUSE. DADDY. BUYING. A. GOOD. LAWYER. THAT'S. WHY. SHE. WAS. CRYING.
...there wasn't enough evidence to prove it was intentional... I bet if the chief had a relative that was a judge there would be enough evidence. That judge should be removed and lose his law license. Justice is blind, not stupid!
@@eddarby469 Many of these court cases are fucking retarded as shit. He booted the side of her vehicle and took off but you shouldn't be speeding excessively at 95+mph i think that is 25mph over the limit
You don’t accidentally chase someone at 80 mph. Intentional!
I was like, what?! she literally chased him down!! ON PURPOSE!!
And premeditated. I can't understand how this wasn't a murder charge.
80 mph chase covering 4 lanes ... yeah ..... she didn't intend on hitting him (S).
The back story is that he kicked her car and then sped off. A witness in the trial confirmed this exchange. The defense claimed that she sped after him to get his license plate information. So it's not that cut and dry of a case.
@@Exxtol1
It actually IS that cut and dry.... someone kicks your car and your entitled to wrecklessly Chase them - putting others at risk - at 80 mph?
Kinda simple when you think about it.....
6 years!!! WTF??? She murdered that man. Our "justice system" is a total joke.
@Salman Javaid lol she did more than cough on him idiot look up the charges vefore u start white knighting loser
@Salman Javaid so what are the charges then genius? Its more than coughing lmfao u better go watch again the main and biggest charge starts with a R and ends with a y. U dipshit 😂✌
@Salman Javaid must be a foreigner lol learn to type. So ur quitting? Awwwww Lmao what a loser. Anyone reading this is gonna see how stupid u are better start deleting 😂 attempted robbery, assault and he got peppersprayed. Since u watched it dipshit have a good one 😘✌
@Salman Javaid odd u wanted to argue at first but ok as long as uve accepted defeat. and the barking u might be hearing is comming from ur moms room might wanna tell her to settle down dont need her making more idiots like u 😉
This kid just got 24 years last week for hitting a woman and her baby @ a cross walk
Hit so hard the family couldn’t recognize his face after…. ONLY 6 YEARS DISGUSTING. How could this happen…
Simple, she's a woman
She chased him across 2 freeways and they call this “voluntary manslaughter”. No that’s 1st degree murder
No, its voluntary manslaughter. Im trusting that the judge is more knowledgeable of how the laws work than you.
@@edgarjacc796 so your logic in life: if they know more, they’re always right. So that means you stand behind judges who sentence pedophiles to only probation after they rape children. I’m not here for your validation, but thanks for showing the world how ignorant you are.
Right. She murdered him in cold blood
You'd think After such a chase down It would be considered "freakin' Voluntary therefore MURDER! Idiot judges sometimes! They sound voluntarily STUPID!
@norcalandrew Thats gotta be proven. When they cannot prove she did it intentionally and she denies it, case fails. So she get 6 years for manslaughter. So if we were to say she did it intentionally and it cannot be proven in court, what then? Should the court then "believe" someting that we think is likely? No, we can believe stuff, but court needs evidence. Police fault then. They shoulda done a better job and brought evidence to the court. Thats the police officers job.
She got off WAY too easily, it should be 50 years.
If it were a man it would have been murder.
@Grey Goose I value my own life. If you take that away from somebody then you're taking away everything kinda. Id call that significant. If someone killed you would that matter to you forever after that?
Absolutely! She chased him:(
@Grey Goose you're right, hopefully the person that kills you only gets a citation.
I figured it would be 10-15 years
My nephew spent 8 years in a Florida prison for having "drugs"
(marijuana) on him bc he was in the proximity of a school that he knew nothing about and bitch runs down a soldier, murders him, and gets 6 years. Yeah that sounds about right!🙄
HEY Mrs. Jones yeah she is a bitch
Welcome to the injustice system
That's what happens when you live in a state like Fl... SMH...
Hey at least she got some jail time! Sure its not enough but she is white and I'm shocked she actually got anything more then 1 year in prison
@aneuB adiV crack heads deserve not to be crack heads I know it's a crazy opinion.
Six years in jail makes no sense
Should have been charged with 1st degree murder and given life sentence.
Absolutely. Why doesn't everyone rise up and demand this.
Agreed
Life sentence hell, why should she live have contact with family and friends. His family visits will be to a cold piece of land to look at a tombstone, that's where her family should be visiting her.
You need to revise the definition of premeditated (aka first degree) murder.
James H
6 years is ALL she got? That’s bull. He died. That was a LIFE sentence.
@@brianlokolong3798 Correction. Woman privilege.
My thoughts exactly. The victim doesn't get to walk away after 6 yrs. The victims life is permanently over.
There's criteria that needs to be met for murder, and this wasn't it. It's not the judge's fault, it's the way the law is written. Her sentence isn't all that light for a road rage crime. If you don't like it, then run for Congress and change the law.
Yep, this is the american justice!!!
I would say 20-25yrs minimum
She hit him so hard, his family couldn't identify him. 6 years is all she received? She should never be able to drive again.
It was murder. She should never see the outside of a prison again.
She is white
she is white
black woman 20 years
Us land of kinda having justice
How do you drive 96mph and follow someone over two highways and hit them but you didn’t mean to ?! Uh what
6 years seems pretty light for killing someone in with her car with full knowledge of what she was doing. Angry or not this is totally unacceptable.
I agree, but at the same time this was manslaughter not murder.
Quicksilver wonder who she knew cuz had it been me? Life without parole, especially since he was in the Military!
Quicksilver my thoughts exactly
Clark Kent yes exactly
well i guess if she was Middle Eastern whose name was Fatima then she would be in for life.
6 year's? Really I know men who got 8 year's for weed
@@RastaWayne-di4sj enough weed for a elephant to collapse
lmao
@Linda Gray when was that happened? And where
If you're going to kill someone make it look like an accident that way if you get caught you only serve six years instead of life
Welcome to California
6 years? that's it? man human life is cheap these days
TheTokuin it's because she's a woman.
TheTokuin yupp.. Watch in syria.. Iraq and whole africa region.. They r just getting killed by the zionists
+TheTokuin She holds two privileged titles: She's *white* and a *woman* ...
+The Tribulation With all due respect, how does this case prove that white men are demonized? There's no mention of race in the story, or hatred for the dead dude.
Consider the Kate Steinle case....her killer got no jail time which means Kate's life had no value.
That judge should be disbarred!!!!!!
How can he say it wasn't intentional? I'm baffled by that!
She murdered someone and got 6 years and is crying? She should be cheering
@@TheRealCaptainFreedom VERY BAD "things" WILL def. happen in your life. Sorry that people HAVE failed you kid..
@@shanghunter7697 I’m okay. I said IF that was me.
Captain Freedom lmfao
IKR
@@TheRealCaptainFreedom bro 😂
Putting a washing on the wrong temperature is a mistake, chasing someone across four lanes of traffic is intentional.
@MH: I agree with you mark, but it could not be proven that her intent was to kill him. There was definitely intent on her part to do something.
@@deepsleep7822: Her intent was to annihilate him.
@@deepsleep7822 if you intend to take an action that is likely to lead to bodily injury, in most states that is 2nd if not 1st degree homicide.
@@deepsleep7822 her intention could be different if he was alive . But she savagely killed him already . And even his own family couldnt recognise him. What more do you want to say idiot
@@GhostRider-bd9nc : "idiot" - ah, yes, name calling. You can't support your comments with facts so you resort to name calling. smh.
Darla got six years for her crime.
The dead man's family is serving life for her crime.
wow you made it dark and thoughtful
Exactly! What happens in 6 years ? Does the man walk out of his grave in 6 years ???😡
I just hope she learns at this point. Truly tragic and angered by this. Life isn’t truly fair
What a useless judge. Recall him and remove him from the bench
She chased him down the highway! That's called intent. What did the judge mean when he said he couldn't prove it was intentional.
Precisely! If deliberately chasing someone along the highway and then deliberately ramming them isn't premeditated, I don't know what is. Her flying into an idiotic rage wasn't premeditated, but by the time she ran him down it had become premeditated. She should have gotten 60 years, not 6, for first-degree murder.
Our justice system is a goddamn roulette wheel.
Exactly that’s what I said what does he mean he can’t prove it. Chasing someone on a highway is pretty evident...wow.
That's not what he said. Rather he stated there wasn't enough evidence to prove the crime was intentional. Meaning he decided evidence was insufficient-not beyond a reasonable doubt-to prove the defendant guilty to the fullest extent of the penalties on all charges.
So, guilt couldn't be proven to such a degree that her ultimate intent was to murder the victim.
Obviously there was intent, it existed of course - but to what degree and for what purpose specifically? That's what it comes down to, at the sentencing hearing.
@@E4Sierra Without question almost any outcome in a court of law rests squarely on the discretion of the judge. This particular case was NOT the exception. She was charged, convicted, and sentenced of the crime in question; so we get to sentencing. Here's were most rational people restle with a 6 year extent given under 'intent' or lack there of.
The judge himself needs to be sentenced to 6 years for giving this sentence.
Yeah 6 years... After, chasing someone down and running them over...
@@elliothuh669 6 years is too little.
@@imo098765 Should be 20 years at least
@Dr. Van Nostrand You're in need of a brain replacement if you think 6 years is justice for this crime.
@Dr. Van Nostrand Then he should have given her 11 years dickhead.
Justice was NOT served!!... she knew what she was doing, she did it on purpose!!... My condolence to his family.
Definitely not what a disgrace
Naw look at the whole trial instead of the clip. He didn’t deserve to die but he wasn’t innocent
she'll be out next year...wtf🧐
How tf you know she did it on purpose dumb ass the state has no evidence so u do?
@@aewanmershah518 you fool she chased him for miles HOW MUCH EVIDENCE CAN YOU GET
A car is a deadly weapon. People need to realise this.
Hunting somebody down with your car across four lanes of traffic and two highways is not an accident. It’s a decision.
And INTENT to do unspeakable harm upon that person(s).
*IT WAS INTENTIONAL !!!*
She intended to kill that young man, it is a great loss to the family and his country. It cost a lot of time and a lot money to train a navy officer.
*IT WAS INTENTIONAL !!!*
@@brahim119 we know this money talks then people walk
It’s facts of life
She made a very intentional decision that day and now this young man is gone forever. Prayers for his family and friends.
The fact that she's performing all these hysterics over a slap on the wrist after murdering a man is beyond me, This woman is evil.
I think she's worse than evil.
You are right
6 years in prison isn’t exactly a walk in the park.
Entitled Karen.
She wasn’t convicted of murder, she was convicted of manslaughter.
She killed him with a car same as with a gun, it was murder
just what do you think "involuntary manslaughter is? its 3rd degree murder gee whiz
@@johnjerman3421
But they treated like it was a DUI accident or something and not an intentional crime
6 years in prison for running over a marine man? White privilege, female privilege. If it was a cop she woukd have gotten more time. All of you military people, Americs values cops more than your lives.
@@lior995 You can't prove it was an intentional crime though. For all you know, she chased him to force him to stop so she could get out and scream at him
All men are created equal, should be the same sentence even if he was a Mexican or black
She senselessly took a life and gets only 6 years in prison. Justice was not served, she got off easy.
she is white and a female, that's why
@@LNasterio normally I wouldn't bring up race but I mean what other factor is there to this bullshit??🤦
@@Onikag women
Justice was served.
Senselessly? More like sense fully.
They charged her with "manslaughter" which is legally defined as being accidentally responsible. As if her chasing down someone going 90 mph was just an oopsie.
Right. Sounds like 2nd degree murder.
@Imariuz adequate provocation would be him posing an ordinary physical threat (threat of minor to moderate bodily harm.) She was in no danger of any kind of bodily harm in this exchange.
over multiple lanes of traffic. She followed that man for miles. I'm disgusted that wasn't enough to meet the burden of proof for intent to kill.
@@fbbWaddell maybe his family will find her when she gets out? If I happen to know where and when she’s being released, I will gladly tell them.
@Imariuz Voluntary Manslaughter is intentionally harming someone which leads to their death. 2nd degree is almost impossible to prove here as they're is no way to prove she wanted to kill him instead of saying she just wanted to harm in a fit of rage but he ended up dying.
Too light of a punishment. She killed someone. Life is what she should get.
urmaker love your channel
I agree 200%
People have received sentences of 10-14 years for simple possession of pot and she gets 6 years-probably 3 for4 good behaviour- for killing an innocent person.
6 fucking years SMH???? that's not justice
not life... i say 10 years
6 years? What is wrong with that judge? 6 years for a lost life? Hopefully she gets a little something more in prison. Maybe she’s have a fit of rage there that will actually land her serious time. This is disgusting.
This man served in the military and then gets killed by a Karen on the highway. What a fate. She got off way too easy. Only 6 years? That's a joke!
The man who deliberately drove into my cousin's car, killing her two infant daughters, got a piddling little fine. Sometimes justice just isn't metered out fairly.
@@jen9774 wow. I'm sorry about that that's ridiculous I'm sorry you and your family had to go through that.
@CornishRicky she can just move to a different area of California or the US and start over again. 6 years for chasing someone across 4 freeways and striking them at over 80 miles per hour. All of this over a passenger side mirror. $100 piece of equipment is worth a man's life. The judge also needs to be removed from the bench.
@@jen9774 that is so heartbreaking… we had a family friend who was murdered during his job as a gas station cashier by a robber. the police never found the guy, I doubt they really even tried to find the killer.
This is not Karen behavior.
That judge needs to be evaluated. You hit someone at 96 miles an hour and the judge couldnt say it was intentional or not 😦. Bro at a minimum it should've been 15
Maybe judge though this case was about speeding? ;p
Womans normally get it ezz, just a few weeks ago a drunk woman that killed another womans just married husband and her unborn baby got 12, and dont forget that they normally get release in 1/4 of the time due to clemency
I think if that happened over here in the uk, I’m pretty sure she would got more as we calculated the speed over the speed limits, the cost of life, the road rage offence will be added, she would have a lot more that that. And now the government just passed a law if a nurse, police constable, EMT or military will get life
@@StoneCoolds Women.
That’s when your take it into your own hands and kill them yourself fr, that’s why some people shoot after accidents
She’s acting like she received a life sentence. Pathetic.
#metoo
which is what she should have received
this just makes me lose faith in humanity
Ya well most likely she’s a narcissist, they always try to act like the victim😒
Probably a liberal
What am I not getting? Darla Jackson willfully and deliberately chased him down at a reckless high rate of speed, and could have caused an accident with other motorists. Upon reaching him she actually hit him and killed him.
So why is this lunatic sobbing because she only got a DESPICABLE 6 years in prison ? And even worse is if she eligible for early release and then on parole.
This creature should have gotten life in prison or a minimum of 50 years for this. What the heck else is this judge needing ? He should have his head examined or be removed from the bench. This is one reason why criminals often laugh about their crimes when being sentenced- because for many the punishment is not hard and long enough.
This is completely awful !!
people have received much longer sentences for crimes that didn’t even result in the death of an individual. the justice system is broken
Imagine if she had drugs in her car when she was arrested.
Yup, they locked up a guy for 30 years for drug possession, ?and this one is 6years
@@ReiRei992 And with "good behavior", she'll probably be out after serving 3-4 years. Infuriating .
She did 2 years, she's out already
She chose to chase him on the interstate at 98 MPH but that wasn't intentional. I wonder how much money her family paid the judge?
2nd degree murder .. should be 15 with an L
Maybe she was *nice* to the right bigwig. If so, I hope it all comes to light at election time.
Exactly my thoughts. Gotta be corruption.
In Pinal county Arizona the PCAO could be bought off for some tacos and bean burrows, Same with the AZDPS.
They didn't pay the judge anything. It's California. The judge gave her what he could. Society is lucky she didn't get probation -- which is more often the case in vehicular homicide cases here.
6 years for murdering a Navy officer?
What's she crying for? She should be cheering and tap dancing with that kind of sentence.
6 years will fly in a jiffy
@@metfreak100 6 days don't go by quickly. 6 years? Nope. She definitely deserved to get waaaay more time though.
Navy Chief
@@simplyluis6548 yep i said that in the negative way, what i meant was 6 years is too less and will fly quick
Well even 3 days in jail aint a walk in the park. 6 years confined in a cell sure would suck balls
So She Meant to Kill Someone aka Murder
And ONLY GOT 6 YEARS!!! 😮
Wtf 🤬
WTF, she's crying croc tears because the judge served her with 6 years?! That's outrageous; she intentionally killed that man. The least she should have gotten was 20 years minimum.
She's a white woman,she can get away with it
@@arsalaniftikhar5920 weak and racist comment
Like 👍
She took a life with a deadly weapon... that's life in prison with probably off parole after 30 years. 6 years is a slap on the wrist and an insult to the Petty Officer's family.
@@paulinarittscher215 Technically it is vehicular homicide. But the prosecution would have to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt. That it was intentional which is hard.
Only 6 years?!!!! Wow! I feel so bad for this man’s family. Wow! Heartbreaking!
And in the end she may only serve only 2-3 years. Get out on parole for "good behavior". The majority of these cases do not serve the full time ordered by the judge.
They need to sue her for wrongful death also in a civil court.
Play silly games, go 6 ft under.
@@vrjanice2 The deceased will be cited for being the instigator and contributor to his own death.
@@donsweet6133 It's easier to find someone guilty in a civil court than in a criminal one. This would be a slam dunk for his family in civil court.
I have a feeling if the situation were reversed, the outcome would have differed greatly.
Not really. A male driver killed 5 people while drunk and only got probation. Money talks.
@@qasemrimawi568 yeah that little rich Punk in Texas. I remember that was the "affluenza" case. Ethan Couch is the kid's name.
@gjaddajg OK, is probation a good enough punishment for reckless driving that resulted in the death of FIVE people?
@@qasemrimawi568 No I think he deserved a harsher punishment but as stated earlier that case was homicide. This one is legitemate murder.
@gjaddajg it isn't different to me. they both should be locked up for murder. that afluenza kid on 5 counts of it.
6 years is nothing more than an arrogant slap in the face to the family .
She's crying over 6 years like it was a life sentence which in this case might actually be fair. Really, she should be grateful that she got off so easy for taking a life.
Exactly. He’s dead forever.
That judge was too lenient. It's upsetting to see how the law and everyone involved once again, field a victim.
Some one needs to tell quit crying a river in court no need to flood the court. Room with her crap tears
She’ll be out in 2. Time flies and he’s still dead. Sucks. Sad
If I was the family I’d take out that b*tch myself the moment she’s out of prison, especially for not even apologizing in court and only trying to make herself look like the victim here. Oh you wanna be a victim, girl? Yeah I’ll make you one. She MURDERED him
Shes crying about loosing 6 years yet no remorse for taking the rest of his life.
I'm pretty sure that's what remorse looks like or how would you describe remorse!?
dbsill cockney He simply stated that he believes she was only remorseful over the fact that she has to go to prison. I'm not sure why you found the comment so confusing. It was pretty simple for me to understand.
dankdreamz Exactly.
Of course, because its all about her man. Who cares about the person she murdered.
She wouldn't be crying like that if she got away with it.
"There was not enough evidence to prove the crime was intentional"... literally wtf. She was speeding in excess of 90 mph, she followed him across several lanes of traffic and rammed into him hard enough that he was launched over 300 feet? How does all of that NOT show intent? She deserved way worse than what she got. She killed a man. So incredibly sad for his family.
For ones in my life I’m with the blond girl
This is easy. They just need to be there when she gets out to give her a welcome out party….. with a piñata
Exactly that is premeditation right there. But she is a woman, so she gets an light sentence. A man molests a kid - he goes to prison (which he should). A woman molests a kid - no prison, and only house arrest. Like wtf?
We live in a day in age where women get off easy, men get 65% longer sentences for the same crimes, I'm surprised she got jail time at all
Sorry if this was a family member she would have to go........ Becky can't get away with it anymore
I think jail sentences should be the same across-the-board all over the country. The U.S. should not leave it to the disgression of an individual judge.
This is literally sick , she deserves 30 years.. she literally murdered him. He had to suffer .
Liberal judge. California.
The results were predictable.
*life without parole
there corrected it for u
Life inside or death
@@jonnyhqwest8506 she murdered him huh? did you read what happened? it was a douche bag on a motorcycle who kicked her car and pulled out in front of her and slowed down. she was tailgating him and got too close. play stupid games wins stupid prizes.
@@craigstevens9351 He hit her car so she killed him and you think that's justified? Maybe you should get a sentence too you sick freak
Disgusting. Back in 2015 a guy in Denver received a 160 yr sentence for a car chase. There was a baby in one of the cars he stole, but he didn't kill anyone. This sick person chases down a man and murders him and she only gets 6 YEARS?!!!! We have some really stupid judges. I hope karma catches up to her.
Must be the patriarchy I keep hearing about. Damn that male privilege.
This was involved in both car chasing, both could be down.🀄🀄
Well, the officer had started the whole road rage by kicking the passenger side door of her car and speeding away
@@Grayald Oh grow a brain. Where’s the MATRIARCHY when that B**** ran over than guy ?
@@Brandespada maybe she almost hit him in the first place and that’s why he kicked her door. She deserves twice that amount of time in jail.
Look at that poor girl crying WITH NO TEARS. May the rest of her life be exactly what she deserves.
She’s a crying whining b , she looks like she can be a Karen, horrible 6 years, that’s insane, the judge is wrong, but , God sees all
👏👏👏👏💯
Fake fake fake act for the judge. I hate fake crying it grates on my ears.
the girl should be freed
@@ernievallejo11 yes she should. Out of jail, and free to roam the outer ring of hell 😌
"I'm not that person" is not a real apology.
6 years?! His life was worth 6 years?! That’s so wrong, that’s not justice
She may not even serve the 6 years. She might be out in 3 years with early release for good behavior.
The biker started it all. Don’t kick someone’s car door while travelling on the highway!!!
So, if someone is drunk and runs over a pedestrian, he's given 50 years in prision, even if it was an accident, because he was drunk. But if u are sober, and you chase a biker and run him over intentionally, you are given 6 years.... i dont understand.
MONEY TALKS AND BULLSHIT WALKS!
she's a woman, that's why
I did some research as to why this happens, but do not take it at face value, I am not an attorney. It depends on the state the crime was committed in, but if we are talking California then the sentences can vary wildly as they look at the individual's criminal record, level of intoxication, circumstances surrounding the crime and many more factors can come into play when prosecuting them. Like repeat offenders get a harsher sentence than a first time offender, obviously. I'm not saying this Karen got the appropriate sentence, but since there was no (substantial) evidence other than eye witnesses i assume, they couldn't charge her with aggravated assault. If they would have, she might have gotten out scot free due to a mistrial. This is cause eye witnesses are solely used to established facts, and not taken at face value anymore. Of course this is just speculation cause I haven't reviewed this case, but it is how I think it went down
@@MrDrProfessorIvan Stop being a sheep trying to be edgy for likes go check out all the dude's who got a slap on the wrist for assaulting children.
Once 50 years when your out if u going in at 23 ur literally will be broke after u get out no pension no job no future so why live
"A mistake"? Nope. When you are sent to the store to buy hot dog buns and you come home with hamburger buns instead...that's a mistake. When you go 80 plus miles an hour to run into someone because you are so angry that you cannot control your temper that is NOT a mistake. I think she should have been charged with murder!
Absolutely - I like the way you think. Who was she trying to run over that by mistake she ran over this man instead? It was no mistake. It was her intention.
Oh so the fact that the navy guy road raged and kicked her car, damaging it, then RAN is completely ignored. So her wanting to catch the guy who just kicked her car and ran away because he knew he would get fined and possible jail time if caught, this makes her a murderer? Something else to consider, they make it out like she dragged the guy for miles. It was 300 feet at 80 mph. Thats not very far at all. Im sorry, I feel bad for the guy dieing but this was his fault. This is todays motorcyclists attitudes. you piss me off, I take out your mirror. It wrong, its illegal and it should never happen under any circumstances ever. Dont get me wrong, she had some blame in this to but Im not sure it was cut and dry road rage on her part. This should be a lesson to motorcyclists everywhere. road rage and possibly lose your life.
You know whats ironic here. If the guy had lived and been severely disabled after this, This woman probably would not have gotten any jail time because of him road raging and damaging her car in the first place. Sorry, I have little pity for motorcyclists that do this kind of thing.
Darren Cole - There were 1,000 other motorists on the road, and not one of them behaved the way this woman did. SHE is responsible for her actions.
I'm 65 and I've been driving - in several countries - since I was a teenager. You can bet I've encountered plenty of idiot drivers. Yet I never felt I had any right to chase after anybody and run them down. We live in a civil society and just as you expect other people to behave morally, they expect you to behave morally as well.
Darren Cole - Also, you think 300 feet is "not very far at all?" It's the length of a football field. This weekend, take your girlfriend to a football field, ask her to lay down at the goal line and then drag her the whole length of the field. See if she thinks that 300 feet is "not very far at all."
Darren Cole
Do you ride? I do. Pay no attention to motorcycles like a lot of drivers do and you might get your car kicked or mirror smashed. I take it you have never been on a bike honking your horn as some ass hat swerves into your lane when your along side them with no where to go. Ya, she got mad. SHE chased him. SHE hit him and pushed him and his bike 300 feet down the highway at 80mph BEFORE he crashed. If he did something to her car then she needs to call the police. She didn't. SHE CHOSE to run him down a d kill him. She's a killer!! Nothing more. Nothing less.
This is not justice. She'll probably be out in 2 years.
1:54 Don’t you just love it when people say “I’m not that type of person” yet they clearly are that type of person because they literally did it.
She wanted to do it, and followed through with it. She got what she wanted.
"A mistake is when you step on somebody's foot at the family reunion. A MISTAKE is when you ask a lady when the baby's due and she's not pregnant."
This was not a mistake.
Very well said.
I definitely made the second mistake… do not ask a woman that question ever.
@@animebrat76 always ask her husband first
@@animebrat76 …..ever.
@@animebrat76 me too! I wanted to disappear!!!
She deliberately followed him and there was not enough evidence to prove intent. How much more obvious could it be? This judge needs to be removed.
Yes, what’s up with that? I was dumbfounded by the judge saying that! Someone must have witnessed it.
White woman
@@bobbowie9350 Male judge
@@xys007 white Male judge
@@cheguevara6198 white male judge with black robe
I deserve prison if i did this. Why cry? Six years? Should be life.
Male would get 25 years for running a woman over like that
True. Wouldn't have been "voluntary manslaughter" that's for sure. Would have likely been 2nd degree murder - "killing either be intentional or reckless, and occur in the spur of the moment"
I was searching for that" o if they was black" comment. There's always at least one. It's like where's waldo in this world of victimhood.
@@stillmaninmotion6081 He's not wrong though bud, stop being so backwards.
Stillman In Motion it’s literally been statistically proven that African Americans get sentenced to 20-30% longer sentences compared to other ethnicities for the same crimes. Just because you don’t hear about it, doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen, man.
@@seandent3732 and does it take into account their previous records?
She's acting like she's the victim. I love how these people always say this is not me. It is you. Six years is not near enough.
she only got six years cuz of her pussypass
She only got 6 years because the justice system is BULLSHIT!
everyone is a victim in their own narrative -- remember that.
Six years is nothing for what she did.
It's really dumb. Here in the UK - quite a soft touch place - she would have got 10-12+ years and almost certainly a lifetime ban on holding a driving licence.
probably she had no priors and she had like a scholarship?was working etc a stable home all these factors help and her gender let's not forget that one.
At least her family can still see her albeit behind bars and hug her when she is released. What about the gentleman's family; she has robbed them of the luxury of talking to, hugging and spending time with him. There will aways be something missing in their beings, their lives; an emptiness.
6 years that's too lenient, she took away a life that should carry a minimum of 25 years not 6 years. She intended to cause harm . Prosecution should appeal for harsher sentence
Prosecutors can't appeal, you can't be tried or convicted for the same crime twice, 6 years is a damn joke but manslaughter is the lowest form of homicide and there are limitations for how long a judge can sentence a defendant
You obviously never taken a law class of you think dbl jeopardy is legal
Double jeopardy is legal. It's included in and guaranteed by the fifth amendment. And prosecutors can appeal. Sentencing and conviction are not the same. Conviction is the determination of guilt. Sentencing is the punishment dispensed upon a guilty verdict. In the same way that a person found guilty can appeal their sentence and ask for a reduction based on legal grounds. Prosecutors can appeal and ask for a harsher sentence based on legal grounds. There is no trial in a sentencing appeal but simply a hearing. The person's guilt or innocence isn't in question. Only whether or not the punishment was adequate. And either side can appeal the sentence. It's rare that the prosecution appeals, but it does happen occasionally. Information about the fifth amendment, double jeopardy and prosecutorial appeals are easy to find in a google search or your local library. So you don't have to take my word for it.
@@wildandcrazygal you sound dumb af
@@rolandkennedy80 lmao. Dude you're a nameless, faceless keyboard warrior. People actually have to care what you think before you can upset them. And since you clearly have no idea what you are talking about. I care even less about your opinion. But thanks for the laugh. Trolls always amuse me.
How the hell can chasing a motorcyclist with a car, over several lanes on a freeway, and ramming into him doing over 80 mph, NOT BE INTENTIONAL????
It's the Murder that was not intentional
Jimmy Chitwood
Not every person thinks rationally and thinks things through. She doesn't look like like she wanted to kill him. She probably underestimated the Speed and crashed him. Otherwise she would've left the scene after hitting him.
its because they had no evidence therefore its not true and was all based on testimony that cant be taken seriously because people were too far away for the law to take those statements at face value
People (men that is) are often using the defense of "I didn't mean to kill him" after they repeatedly have kicked and jumped on some poor victims head. Sometimes the court agrees.
He kicked the side of her car and she said she was trying to get his "information". (license tag I assume)
Some drivers get sentenced to 50 years for accidentaly killing someone, how does intentional murder gets only 6?!?
TheKnives777 savage man.
The Judge was expecting a bj in return that is why her sentence is very light.
Watched this moments before, is why was shocked: ua-cam.com/video/y1R5q3iz5jU/v-deo.html
I know it was kids and two of them, but half a century is still a lot for a mistake on a road, and the guy admitted his guilt and was sorry. By that logic this girl should get at least 25 years, certainly not 6.
woman privilege
Female privilege is real.
6 years ? This is shameful. What is wrong with the judge ? From the description of the event This woman was gunning for this man and acted with extreme malice and intent.
"not enough evidence it was intentional"
WTF give the judge life...
Chasing him down like an animal over several highways apparently wasn't 'enough evidence' for that judge. What? Was he bribed?
To fair , we didn't hear the judge say those words. The reporter said that is what he said. We don't know what he actually said.
Yea wtf judge unbelievable
Liberal judge
Give the judge a brain.
2 years, and she'll be out on probation. This judge
should be investigated. What a terrible miscarriage
of justice.
plot twist: it's his long lost daughter.
nah, jk. an appropriate sentencing would be 15 years. that's good enough. everyone has anger. most cant control it.
Probably has to do with freemasonry.... Most judges are, if she is from a family of higher up masons she will get the easy treatment.
LATVERIAN1 she's white
Green I'm African from Africa. thanks God here it's not criminals like USA. we live peace, I'm not racist OK I love very everybody just saying cuz white are racist.
The girl has probably never been held accountable for anything before in her entire life.
girl?
The thing will be held now… for 6 years!
Always. This was just one more incident of a life of committing minor and major social infractions as a social predator along the way. Usually, no one just starts at the summit of murder and kills; you climb small upward from the base accumulating hassle toward all. Killing was her reaching the summit. That's her; a typical social predator. That was her encore.
I know this girl her mom had money and they lived nice . Darla always wanted to ghetto and well she got what she wanted .
You know she hasn’t!
He hit him so hard the family couldn't identify him and she only got 6 years. That is a joke. Judge needs to be brought up on charges too.
6 years for viciously running down another human being, basically using her vehicle as a weapon. Wow
What a pathetic woman crying like that. She killed him, and she’s upset she’s being sentenced?
#metoo
@@Schimml0rd Yup. Female privilege. She's been getting away with things her entire life and now she's shocked she has to be responsible for her actions.
@@Schimml0rd What does a campaign against sexual harassment have to do with this case?
Only 6years. I've seen people sell $20 worth of weed 3 times get more time then that. This is bs
Mr Green Same. It pisses me off
Mr Green I'm gonna call bs on that sir
totalba69 California has a 3 strikes law which requires mandatory jail time if you violate the law 3 times. Weed is a common crime that counts as one of those strikes
Mr Green yeah but they wouldn't lock you up for more than 6 years if you were selling grams
totalba69 lol you never seen a California court room have you. We are famous for doing harsh punishment for minor crimes. Once this dude stole $134 of dvds and got 50 years of jail that's $50,000 per year paid by the tax payers or $5,000,000 cause some black person stole less then $200 of stuff.
That ain't Road Rage ?
That's premeditated murder !
the justice system failing victims day after day.6yrs for cold blooded murder...throw that judge in jail.
“Not intentional”?? She chased him down, then ran him over. Should’ve been 15-20 years for such an intentional act of brutality.
She should get life.
Jaco, how do you know she ran him down ?
I did not hear any witness say that . Only the lawyer paid to get her said that. And this video cuts off her statement . Ask yourself why they do that
Nice Blonde Girl This was a finding of fact by the Court. Driving 80+ mph, crossing 3 lanes of traffic in relentless pursuit, then hitting the deceased and pushing him 300 yds sounds downright accidental - only to the perpetrator’s mother.
Episode Interactive But, didn’t you see the poor dear crying? Didn’t it melt your heart?
(This is all sarcasm)
Jaco gee why was she going 80mph I wonder? Oh because that’s how fast the guy on the bike who kicked her car was going as he was fleeing the accident he caused. Crossing 3 lanes of traffic you say? Gee that’s because the guy on the bike fleeing the accident he caused was driving recklessly all over the highway to avoid having to pay damages to her car. Then she hit him? Gee Guess you shouldn’t brake check cars you just hit doing 60mph while you’re riding a motorcycle Too bad he’s dead to learn anything from it.
Jackson is an evil person to run someone down on a motorcycle. She deserves much more than 6 years, like a life sentence. She murdered him.
Not premeditated
@@_1ben - WRONG ... she chased him for miles down two freeways at speeds over 100 mph ... premeditation only takes a second. She intended to kill him.
@ i respect your opinion, mine looks like second degree murder or voluntary manslaughter, my interpretation of the penalties, however you look at it, she was as they say " bat-shit" crazy
Road rage is real. I was once chased a good mile for making an obscene gesture at someone who cut me off and nearly sideswiped me. I'll NEVER make that mistake again. But in the hands of someone irate, a car becomes a deadly weapon. And my dad rode motorcycles. I always give them a wide road gap because I know how vulnerable a rider can be. That woman got off very cheaply and bawled about it. No shame.
Her face is public..
Only six years? He never gets to come back alive.
Sam Worth I heard. how is it not enough evidence when the bitch chased him across four lanes of traffic?
The hysterical crying was so annoying.. Women always do that crap..
+Sam Worth so you mean to say that someone crossing all four lanes of traffic and driving 80+ mph while following the person had no ill intentions? Most sane people let it go. I truly think those that have road rage are loose in the mind.
..and she had the nerve to cry at the sentence...what fucking sentence?!!!!!
kitty mcpaws Your pic is adorable!
Had it been a man instead of a woman.
It would of been 60 years. Not 6..
If a man did this he would get the maximum sentence
She literally chased him down across a four lane highway, once getting close enough, accelerates and intentionally hit him, and there isn't enough evidence??? Can someone explain, maybe I'm missing something, but her actions were everything but unintentional.
At this point, wtf does justice even mean, cause we don't seem to be living up to that??🤦🏾♀️ 6 years is a slap in the face, it's disgusting.
@How Why Premeditated is her making the conscious choice to chase this man down and ram into him at 90 mph. While he was on a motorcycle and she was in a large car. That was thought and deliberation. "Premeditation" doesn't mean she spent 5-7 business days deciding she was gonna kill stranger who cut her off. Premeditated murder can be and has been murder decided upon in a matter of minutes. The second she made the (sober, sound minded, and deliberate) choice to CHASE SOMEONE across two freeways and four lanes of traffic, it stopped being a 'heat of the moment" reaction. Not only does your weird comparison not make any sense (if someone hits you, they're an agressor who is also breaking the law. NOT the same as someone passively cutting you off in traffic wtf??) If someone punches you in the face and walks away and you grab a shovel and chase them down four city blocks to murder them, how tf is that a "crime of passion"? You seem to just be making up neat and tidy nonsensical hypotheticals in your head like they'd appear on a fictional crime show.
@How Why Premeditation is when an individual contemplates, for any length of time, undertaking an activity and then subsequently takes the action. It can be as short as, a few seconds, deciding to pick up a hammer to hit someone. First-degree murder is decided by the state, but it's usually the intentional killing of another person by someone who has acted willfully, deliberately, or with planning. She deliberately hit him with that car. You could argue she didn't think it would kill him, but that's really hard to believe since the victim was on a motorcycle. I am pretty sure the prosecutors just wanted to get a conviction they knew would 100% stick.
Yeah, and you can bet she'll get out early.
You said it. It should have been murder and 25 years to life
@How Why 😰 You "study law" and don't even know the most basic definitions of manslaughter and the degrees of murder.... I weep. PLEASE even if you don't have access to actual law books, Google is free and it's there to help you. So you don't spout incorrect "facts" like this again and embarrass yourself in front of strangers.
6 years is a middle finger to her family. An unfair sentence causes great pain and suffering for all the victims family.
To produce the minimal pain and suffering for all people, a long sentence should be given to the criminals. And in this case it should be a life sentence.
Six years is pathetic. She should have gotten 60 years without any possibility of parole.
She is crying for herself!!
Road rage and she chased him down like a lunatic.
It's the motorcyclist who had the road rage. He kicked her car. He provoked the woman for likely no good reason and didn't stop and have a normal conversation like a man. Now he's dead, and he's about 90% responsible for his own death. PS I'm a motorcyclist.
That’s first degree murder. What am I missing here? Nine years? Wtf
Her fucking face is public..