It’s almost like humans were born from multiple sources from all over the world. Not just out of Africa. A huge question that needs to be solved is the Rh-Negative factor. How the hell did that happen?
yeah people love "out of africa" theory rathern than them "moving" out of african and mixing with others. probably because they haven't "found" more "fossils" evidence yet. Stay tuned lol
@@johnnyllooddte3415 Of course it was human. All species in the genus Homo are human. The first one being Homo habilis. Or did you mean "modern human"?
A multi-regional origin for archaic Homo sapiens sounds plausible initially, but genetic evidence is lacking. For example, Eurasian populations only exhibit introgression with recently diverged archaic hominin such as Neanderthals, Denisovans, and a cohort ghost lineage. Conversely, West Africans exhibit introgression from an earlier super-archaic hominin diverged 625 kya including later Neanderthal contributions. The takeaway is that super-archaic introgression with Homo sapiens only occurred in Africa suggesting Eurasian sapiens arrived after super-archaics were extinct. This contribution shows that although Erectus, Antecessor and Heidelbergensis inhabited Eurasia there's no evidence of super-archaic multi-regional admixture in sapiens. These findings suggest archaic Homo sapiens did not evolve on multiple continents.
Too bad that super archaic hominids lived in West Africa as recently as 13,000 years ago. Also homo Sapiens moved into West Africa after they moved into Eurasia. Also there is a problem with their being no sub Sahara DNA older than 20,000 years ago. West Africans mixed with the older hominids. So there is no genetic evidence for any hominid prior to 20,000 years ago. So genetic evidence is lacking for anything about Out of Africa prior to 20,000 years ago.
@@GerbenWulff Indeed, and some would argue H. Floresiensis was too basal to hybridize with Homo sapiens, but since a super-archaic admixed with African sapiens it's plausible Erectus, Antecessor or Heidelbergensis was biologically compatible with Eurasian sapiens. The caveat though is archaic Homo sapiens have only existed in the fossil record since Jebel Irhoud 315 kya, and most of the super-archaics were extinct by that time save for small isolated pockets of Erectus-derived hominin.
We have a cluster of three skulls in Asia, branching off from Neanderthals, this correlates with genetic data we have about Denisovans. So perhaps these are Denisovans.
Very interesting. Everything that we appeared to know for certain is no more. I am actually pleased that this demonstrates that while we are superbly arrogant in our “knowledge”. In fact we know “not a lot” for certain!
If I look at a male gorilla, and a female gorilla, i see clearly massive differences in the skull shape. Same with chimps', ect. But i am yet to hear of this being considered when studying ancient skulls. It forces me to wonder just how many of the various examples of early man are actually just examples of males and females of the same species ??
In Denmark we have tested finds from the early Bronze Age, buried in coffins of hollowed out oak. And even by that time a young girl seems to have come from far away, down south. So the mobility must have been much more common than expected.
There is some evidence of a bronze age connection between Scandanavia and the Mediterranean island of Sardinia. I wonder if there is a connection with what you mentioned.
@@andrewblackard3369 We have found finds giving a connection to trade routes to far away, and Danish Flint (Stones of high quality) became an export from Danish mines already in the named Stone-Age. And we can see that burial traditions change from possible new groups of people coming to Denmark. We are able to see that many bodies from that time come from far away. So I expect that people may have been much more mobile than expected. During Roman times large groups from the north entered and fought the Romans and even became Roman Kings during the Roman decline.
@@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188 There was a huge market for Scandanavian amber among Mediterranean cultures too, expecially the ancient Egyptians. Additionally, they have found bronze-age bronze, isotopically-linked to Sardinia, in Sweden. There seems to be a huge gap in our knowledge for that era, but established proof of long-range trade connections. A very interesting puzzle.
To Highly Compelling: I think the pictures you show often have nothing to do with what you're saying. The chart with the red arrow that disappears into the chart also doesn't seem to have a purpose. I get the sense that all the "information" is spoken and the images are there just to keep us from getting bored. Unfortunately, that only confuses us. Thus, I don't feel compelled.
Yes using maternal dna data I think it is. But there is a genetic and fossil abundance ways of estimating. It was clearly planet of the apes with mixing going on pretty much everywhere. I dont doubt the would have spread out of Africa long before our LCA. When similar species existed everywhere then the tribe we come from migrated and became the tribe that thrn moved out of Africa mixing with other homo species to an extent.
Know a twin set of brothers that other than being great friends they are a spitting image of the cavemen lawyer. I'd love to see a indepth genetic study on them and frankly a couple other's I know 😉
The Anunnaki account indeed ratifies that several ancient humans were made, considered to be unsuitable for service, and put out to different areas, before the successful worker or Lulu. The Adamics created much later were not made from part Lulu or other archaic. Eyebrow-raisers.
There is nothing about the annunaki that has any truth from the ancient aliens people. They didn't even get the Def of annunaki correct. There was no gold mining going on so no need to make us. Jupiter was nibiru so there wasn't even another planet to come from.
the objectively collected data is good... and as long as african heroin is not allowed to have anything, at all, to do with data interpretation; then objective science could be restored. we have had many decades of corruption in data interpretation... and it could take twice as long to sort. protect the objectively collected data, because that doesn't change ... the data supports theories, not "supporters."
H. Antecessor was a Gibraltar Crosser , More Likely a Descendant Of Tchadensis, ( or to say, descendant of one of the many other failed attempts at bipedal evolution resultant of the decidedly messy littering from the trees )
It’s almost like humans were born from multiple sources from all over the world. Not just out of Africa. A huge question that needs to be solved is the Rh-Negative factor. How the hell did that happen?
yeah people love "out of africa" theory rathern than them "moving" out of african and mixing with others. probably because they haven't "found" more "fossils" evidence yet. Stay tuned lol
The more fosils that are found, the more tangled human ancestry seems to get.
The Ndutu skull shows a transition between the Heidelbergensis and Sapiens species, dating to 400,000 years ago in Tanzania
and not human
@@johnnyllooddte3415Your mother was a snowblower and yer pappy was a carton of noodles.
@@johnnyllooddte3415 Of course it was human. All species in the genus Homo are human. The first one being Homo habilis. Or did you mean "modern human"?
Interesting that a video about an ancient human ancestor is “narrated” by robovoice
How ironic.
Darnit! They found Uncle Ned. I thought I'd disposed of him well enough that they'd never find him.
A multi-regional origin for archaic Homo sapiens sounds plausible initially, but genetic evidence is lacking. For example, Eurasian populations only exhibit introgression with recently diverged archaic hominin such as Neanderthals, Denisovans, and a cohort ghost lineage. Conversely, West Africans exhibit introgression from an earlier super-archaic hominin diverged 625 kya including later Neanderthal contributions.
The takeaway is that super-archaic introgression with Homo sapiens only occurred in Africa suggesting Eurasian sapiens arrived after super-archaics were extinct. This contribution shows that although Erectus, Antecessor and Heidelbergensis inhabited Eurasia there's no evidence of super-archaic multi-regional admixture in sapiens. These findings suggest archaic Homo sapiens did not evolve on multiple continents.
Too bad that super archaic hominids lived in West Africa as recently as 13,000 years ago. Also homo Sapiens moved into West Africa after they moved into Eurasia. Also there is a problem with their being no sub Sahara DNA older than 20,000 years ago. West Africans mixed with the older hominids. So there is no genetic evidence for any hominid prior to 20,000 years ago. So genetic evidence is lacking for anything about Out of Africa prior to 20,000 years ago.
Or the species in Eurasia were distinct enough in a way to be unable to hybridize with homo sapiens.
and not humans
@@johnnyllooddte3415Yer mother sniffs airplane glue and your pops is a bent paper clip.
@@GerbenWulff Indeed, and some would argue H. Floresiensis was too basal to hybridize with Homo sapiens, but since a super-archaic admixed with African sapiens it's plausible Erectus, Antecessor or Heidelbergensis was biologically compatible with Eurasian sapiens. The caveat though is archaic Homo sapiens have only existed in the fossil record since Jebel Irhoud 315 kya, and most of the super-archaics were extinct by that time save for small isolated pockets of Erectus-derived hominin.
We have a cluster of three skulls in Asia, branching off from Neanderthals, this correlates with genetic data we have about Denisovans. So perhaps these are Denisovans.
and not human
@@johnnyllooddte3415Your mom bakes cakes for yodelers and your dad wears dead squirrels for socks.
Makes sense
@@machinebeard1639 Your momma wears combat boots and your daddy sews socks that smell.
Why do i suspect that if you could put living specimens of these groups together they would look and act pretty much the same.
Very interesting. Everything that we appeared to know for certain is no more. I am actually pleased that this demonstrates that while we are superbly arrogant in our “knowledge”. In fact we know “not a lot” for certain!
These text to speech voices are definitely getting better ... but are still in the 'uncanny valley' for me ... R (Australia)
still these are not human
@@johnnyllooddte3415Your mom is the lobster lady at the carnival and your dad was a pogo stick.
This one is not so bad
@@johnnyllooddte3415 You are a idiot? Asking for your dear mom!
If I look at a male gorilla, and a female gorilla, i see clearly massive differences in the skull shape. Same with chimps', ect.
But i am yet to hear of this being considered when studying ancient skulls.
It forces me to wonder just how many of the various examples of early man are actually just examples of males and females of the same species ??
In Denmark we have tested finds from the early Bronze Age, buried in coffins of hollowed out oak. And even by that time a young girl seems to have come from far away, down south. So the mobility must have been much more common than expected.
There is some evidence of a bronze age connection between Scandanavia and the Mediterranean island of Sardinia. I wonder if there is a connection with what you mentioned.
@@andrewblackard3369 We have found finds giving a connection to trade routes to far away, and Danish Flint (Stones of high quality) became an export from Danish mines already in the named Stone-Age. And we can see that burial traditions change from possible new groups of people coming to Denmark. We are able to see that many bodies from that time come from far away. So I expect that people may have been much more mobile than expected. During Roman times large groups from the north entered and fought the Romans and even became Roman Kings during the Roman decline.
@@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188 There was a huge market for Scandanavian amber among Mediterranean cultures too, expecially the ancient Egyptians. Additionally, they have found bronze-age bronze, isotopically-linked to Sardinia, in Sweden. There seems to be a huge gap in our knowledge for that era, but established proof of long-range trade connections. A very interesting puzzle.
Interesting, but I'm afraid there is a big difference between "could have been" and "is proven to be." :)
virtually nothing that old that can be proven completely so there's always speculation
To Highly Compelling: I think the pictures you show often have nothing to do with what you're saying. The chart with the red arrow that disappears into the chart also doesn't seem to have a purpose. I get the sense that all the "information" is spoken and the images are there just to keep us from getting bored. Unfortunately, that only confuses us. Thus, I don't feel compelled.
Are there ways to approximate the total population counts of the various sapien species?
Yes using maternal dna data I think it is. But there is a genetic and fossil abundance ways of estimating. It was clearly planet of the apes with mixing going on pretty much everywhere. I dont doubt the would have spread out of Africa long before our LCA. When similar species existed everywhere then the tribe we come from migrated and became the tribe that thrn moved out of Africa mixing with other homo species to an extent.
It’s a lot more complex than though just 25 years ago. And it’s going to be found to be even more complex than thought today.
Fascinating
Can you make the speech a bit slower please.... It all feels bit of a gallop through the information. It's very Interesting infor9.
Maybe this is the scull of a animal no longer around. Maybe it is not human at all
Namibia isn't pronounced Name-bah. It's Nah mib ee ah Serengeti is pronounced with a hard g, not a soft g.
Not that serious bro, wether pronounced right or wrong you get the point
It's a text-to-speech program.
It would be a kick in the nuts if it turned out that he was actually a migrant from asia
I notice that Andrew Tate has similar brow ridges....
Must spend a lot of time noticing him
Know a twin set of brothers that other than being great friends they are a spitting image of the cavemen lawyer.
I'd love to see a indepth genetic study on them and frankly a couple other's I know 😉
and neither are humans
He's successful so there's that
Don't insult our ancestors and compare them to that cretin.
Ancestor X = the Missing Link?
That looks like my Uncle Ernie!
Maybe if his beard grew in better 😂😊
a lot of speculation expressed with too much confidence...
What does the Holy Bible tell about this find? Much older, it seems than any line from Adam and Eve!
It seems no HSS ancestor. It looks like neanderthal ancestor.
The Anunnaki account indeed ratifies that several ancient humans were made, considered to be unsuitable for service, and put out to different areas, before the successful worker or Lulu. The Adamics created much later were not made from part Lulu or other archaic. Eyebrow-raisers.
There is nothing about the annunaki that has any truth from the ancient aliens people. They didn't even get the Def of annunaki correct. There was no gold mining going on so no need to make us. Jupiter was nibiru so there wasn't even another planet to come from.
See the Urantia book for clues
So they see differences
One thing humans
Another the others
Even there they are not the same
Is written
Reference?
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8454562/
and still not human
Thank you
@@johnnyllooddte3415Yer mom is a Bigfoot and your daddy was a hamster.
@@machinebeard1639 You insulted Bigfoot and the hamster. SAD...
the objectively collected data is good... and as long as african heroin is not allowed to have anything, at all, to do with data interpretation; then objective science could be restored.
we have had many decades of corruption in data interpretation... and it could take twice as long to sort.
protect the objectively collected data, because that doesn't change ... the data supports theories, not "supporters."
H. Antecessor was a Gibraltar Crosser , More Likely a Descendant Of Tchadensis,
( or to say, descendant of one of the many other failed attempts at bipedal evolution resultant of the decidedly messy littering from the trees )
You are human
The other is not
Logos
lazy comment, algo, etc
and still not humans
@@johnnyllooddte3415Your mamma is a baboon's butt hole and your dad is a light bulb.
robot, no thanks
Everyone Understands From. 639 To 539 Is The KEY!! Pcitpl Seperation Pf ! Species!!😮
The what seperation?
This is a bot channel. Please don't watch bot channels.
No, human created with a million mouse clicks.
Early humans are still laughing at this new bot technology.
Look for blondes and redheads.