I bought the ranger and love it. It feels better on wrist than in photos. Anyway, it's okay that many people hate it and dislike this model and express numerous negative thoughts. It just make me realize that I really bought it solely becos "I like it" but not becos "others like it".
I simply do not understand those who seek validation or approval when deciding on a watch. It's sad. I ALWAYS buy what I like and don't give a single shit about what anyone else thinks.
Ordered my Ranger yesterday. This is a sleeper that will only appeal to those who really want simplicity and durability. I'd guess most will think it's too simple, boring, whatever aesthetically, but to me it's perfect and exactly what I want in a high-quality field watch. You have to see it in the flesh to appreciate it, the dial has some great texturing. Will keep it forever, and hope to get many battle scars on it throughout the years :) Thanks for the great vid!
My kind of watch. To complain it's boring is to completely miss the point IMHO. Let this Tudor be the kind of watch Rolex doesn't even make anymore. A simple, functional field watch that is about clarity of form and simplicity of function. It's superb.
The design of this model was just what I was looking for in my next watch. The clean unassuming face with a brushed steel case/bracelet and solid build quality that doesn't attract attention. This fits my style of a luxury daily driver like a Toyota Land Cruiser, well done Tudor.
This was my first watch. I graduated about a year ago and got a great job so I’d been out on the prowl for months and when the Ranger got released I emailed the AD straight away. I was lucky enough to get the first one in my city. I love it so much and every time I look at it I just feel proud. I actually like it’s simplicity and I wouldn’t have it any other way.
I loved this watch from the moment I first saw a picture of it. I went into a shop and tried it on a couple of months or so and immediately made the decision to reserve one. I picked up today (after it arrived a about a week ago) and I absolutely love it. I own a Rolex Datejust in steel and white gold that I got new in 1985, plus I bought a new Panerai Radiomir Black Seal in 2008. This Tudor Ranger is right up there with those two watches. All of the negative comments about “too boring”, “ not eye catching” is exactly what I like about it. Its classic and simple styling make it a tour de force. Less is more.
you gotta remember that much of teddy's audience is into man-jewelry and bro recognition. i have owned many luxury watches over the years but swore off a decade ago. nevertheless i have a ranger on the way now 😄
I just bought one last week. It was our families first time on a cruise and I was also celebrating my 10 year anniversary of starting my own business. I could not possibly be any happier. It’s my first Tudor. I own several Omegas, a couple of Oris watches, some Hamilton’s (new and vintage), I also have some micro brands I learned about from your videos Ocean Crawler, Traska and Vaer. I am super impressed and in Love with the Ranger.
One thing that is often overlooked with the dial design is that it really closely matches the aesthetic of state and national park ranger uniforms, at least the ones here in the US. It’s not a sexy uniform but is highly functional and distinct. Kind of like hiking pants lol
Love this new Ranger! I didn't like the outgoing one at all, so this is a big improvement, especially with the in-house movement! I would say that this model is best described as a "Black Bay-ized" Ranger. Which I think is a logical move, since the Black Bay is so popular. This approach works well for the Ranger, and gives it continuity with Tudor's other sport models. While it lacks a little of the original Ranger's charm and gracefulness, it does make the new Ranger more sporty and solidifies it as a modern Tool Watch. The small, original case being lifted from the Prince, which was of course more of a dress model and didn't quite work for it's purpose as a robust sports watch. Also, the new look further differentiates it from the traditional Oyster styling of current Rolex models. All these new models have done the seemingly impossible task of giving the modern Tudor brand its own separate look while still retaining some of its Rolex design cues. The only puzzling thing about the new Ranger is why there is no dial reference to its seemingly Chronometer movement. Do we know its COSC for sure?
Bought my Ranger on Saint Barts. Clean lines and unpretentious. This flies under the radar with class. Having this watch, I probably won’t wear my Rolex Sub very much.
I think a lot of people don't "get" the watch, so they criticize it because they are trying to make it something it isn't. It's intended to be a classic tool field watch, made with modern technology. The Ranger is not trying to be a BB, or a modern Old Ladies Broach (Explorer). If that's the look you want, buy a BB36, or get on the waiting list for an Old Ladies Broach.
Absolutely agree with you. Futhermore the watch looks so much better in person. I'm very happy with mine and really love the mix of modern and vintage design.
@@ekimandersom4478 Hamilton are nice, but not on the level of Tudor. I wasn't aware IWC made simple field watch, I thought they were mostly pilot's watches.
Perfectly said. You get how the watch is intended to be which a lot of people don’t. It’s a great everyday watch and being all brushed stays under the radar and can take a scuff here and there and not notice
The only Rolex I ever wanted was the Rolex Explorer. But this Tudor Ranger looks far closer to the era of Explorer that I like than the current offerings from Rolex. Cheaper too... bonus.
I think it looks much better in person. I have been able to checkout all three options. The bracelet and clasp are amazing, especially for the price point. If I was looking for a watch that could go anywhere and do anything I think the bracelet is the best, but for someone looking for a tool watch they will wear hiking or casually I think their nato strap looks the best. It adds some color, helps the bit of red on the seconds hand pop and really gives it a rugged field ready esthetic. The black rubber strap also looks great, and is very comfortable. If I wanted versatility, but lived somewhere hot, or wanted to keep it under 3k the rubber strap is perfect.
yep. i'll wear mine on a single pass nylon strap because it'll be an actual field/work watch. as nice as the bracelet is i figure it'll fetch 900 on ebay bringing my cost basis down below 2k for my new ranger
I bought the Ranger two days ago and love it. I commented to the AD that my dream watch was the ROLEX Explorer 36mm but had never tried it on - they got one out of the back room and let me try it and then told me waiting list no too bad 18 months to 2years and offered to put me on the waiting list - perfect outcome for me! Time to save up!
I really like the Ranger 39mm and the old 36mm without the date or with the date, I really like the numeral layout and the sizing of the numbers and the 3 6 9 layout over the other field watch layouts. You always do a great program Teddy.
I just ordered one myself, paid $2,400 for “used brand new” stock condition. But I have to wait a month to get it so the video helps with the wait. I want a boring, badass watch that won’t raise too many eyebrows…when I wear my aqua terra, people think I’m super rich/spoiled, when that’s not actually true. This watch is very nice and flies under the radar. I think it’s a home run!
I have a number of watches including Rolex seadweller, dateless sub and a couple of others and bought this. Didn’t go looking for it but the finish and in house movement took my eye and I was impressed though the scarcity of any Rolex but mainly the sports ones means it was a great piece for fair money. Delighted with the watch I can see why some may say it has a boring face but I like the no fuss, good size face add to its history (though I agree tentative). Great functional no frills look suits what I want. Delighted and just thought I would share
Great review. I own the new Tudor and opted for the hybrid rubber strap. It simply looks great and wears amazingly well. The key for me was getting over the 39mm case, as I found my BB58 Navy Blue a little on the small size. The larger dial on the Ranger ticks those boxes. The T-Fit clasp like on my other BB58 Boutique Bronze is just fantastic and affords you the ability to adjust on the fly as temperatures affect your wearability. I like the printed numerals and one dimensional look on the hybrid rubber, it just works so well. The price is great considering you're getting pedigree in the MT COSC certified engine. The sapphire domed crystal also makes it all pull together. Fabulous review as always
The Ranger has a great movement, case, bracelet and build quality. I have issues with the dial, which looks too plain for the price. This is due to a combination of factors: too much negative space, a boring font, printed indices and an odd lume color. I own a BB58, which is my favorite watch in my collection. But I'll wait for my AD to get me a 36mm Explorer.
I like the lack of text on this dial. The Rolex explorer and other watches over explain their features in the dial text. If you care about watches you know what it does. If you don’t care about watches you won’t give a damn anyway. Less clutter makes it easier to read.
Huge Tudor fan generally. My advice here though is to stick to the Black Bay range (incl. 58, GMT & Chrono) Get the Explorer (if you can) as opposed to the Ranger for this style watch. The white gold applied markers are much nicer than the greeny painted markers here imho.
As soon as the new Tudor Ranger release was announced I put in my order. I love the simple dial, domed crystal and the unique handset. The smaller size compared to the previous Heritage Ranger version is a big improvement. It’s been running about +1 second a day for the past week. I’m really happy with this purchase.
I have this watch and the 41mm, the 41mm was always a bit big, this is an upgrade in many ways and wears really. I like the minimalist look of the dial.
I bought the Tudor Ranger 39mm on a bracelet as soon as it came out. The Ranger is low-key and uncomplicated. A perfect no-nonsense field watch I can wear everywhere I go.
I really like this watch and I am speaking as someone who doesn't usually care for Tudor/ Rolex watches in general. The dial is simple and practical. The sizing is perfect. The bracelet and strap options are good. The in house 4hz movement is great. If I had a gripe at all I would like raised/applied numerals but that is a decent trade-off for the price overall. This is a Tudor I would actually buy.
I personally wouldn't sell this watch as a "beginners" luxury watch. A "beginner" wants a deal of bling for their hard earned $3000. This is definitely not that! This is a specialist watch for those that want very comfortable wear, incredibly clear time, and a take every wear ability without being scared of theft or the odd scratch. The chamfering on the side and bubble sapphire lend a jewellery feel that's surprising. A top travellers watch, very well balanced, accurate movement, very comfortable, thin, small lug to lug and one that just gets worn an awful lot against the heavier, blingier and much more expensive pieces in my collection.
I love the new Ranger and bracelet, honestly wouldn’t change a thing. Really like Tudor’s more retro designs, guess I’m getting a bit nostalgic in my old age.
Teddy, you are my first stop in my journey for watch buying. Thank you for all of your shared knowledge, advice and opinions regarding all things horology.
I tried it on at my AD and took the plunge this evening. Thanks for the helpful review and great vid. I had been wanting a GMT and the current Tudor GMT and the BB Pro just didn’t lead to love on my 6.5” wrist but the Ranger did.
Excellent video! This is yet another evidence that Tudor is becoming its own brand. I just added the Panda Black Bay Chrono in my collection and I couldn’t be happier with its design and quality… unmistakably Tudor.
Another outstanding video Teddy, I was fortunate enough to get my hands on this at release date. This is my 8th Tudor. I had an explorer and it was kinda like meeting your hero, got bored with it and got rid of it ultimately. So I’m more than happy now.
Very interesting to hear your unconventional ownership history here, my friend! Enjoy the new Ranger, sounds like he has good company in your collection haha.
@@KeepingWatchUK Yeah it is like selling your Porsche and getting a Beatle, but if it works for him. Beatle has a lot of charm and totally niche though.
@@TeddyBaldassarre Wills Meg is just flexing lol. I have got every single recent hot Tudor (I passed on the Ceramic 🤮) at release date 🥱 (9 now Meg and no mediocre BB58 either) and I do not even own a 🤵🏻♂️🤣🤣🤣🤣 10th should be early Sept. 😈 Keep up 🏃🏻♂️
Those complaining about the Ranger release know nothing about the heritage of this model. Please refer to vintage references 7965, 7991, 7995, 7996, 7966, 90020, 90200, 90220. There's nothing boring about this new release.
Back in the day, people who wore a Ranger had a life, did cool things, the watch was along for the ride. It seems like in 2022, watch people don't leave the internet, and keep their watches in the box in the safe. They want "excitement" from merely owning their watch. it's sad.
The main thing putting me off this watch is the printed rather than applied numerals and indices. Currently, I would easily choose the much-much cheaper Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical over this…give it quality applied indices though and neutral white SuperLuminova and things might change.
you have a great way of explaining things without repeating yourself. the way you explained the the function of the T clasp perfectly clarified the questions i had
I've had hands on with this piece and having applied markers and a stronger lume would lift it's overall appeal IMO. I have a couple of Tudors and this one just looks rather flat and one dimensional for me.
Great perspective, Teddy (as usual). I tried one of these at my local AD and it fit well. Love the “former” Explorer vibe. The printed face is nice (see: vintage Explorers that everyone seems to love) - whereas the new Explorer seems a bit too flashy for a tool watch. Bottom Line: I’ll stick with my 41mm Heritage Ranger. I like the red seconds hand and bigger face, despite the fact that I have a small wrist. I just like the look better. It’s also great on a NATO or silicone strap.
I bought one yesterday! It's half the price of my Date-just. My only negative is that of the hour markers look unfinished. It's self winding movement is nice! I plan to wear it daily.
I bought it when it first came out on the hybrid strap and love it! Its the perfect do it all watch while being understated but really well made. Would've preferred a 37-38mm case but am very happy with 39. I also feel that the strap breaks up the steel well and makes it pop a bit more and makes it feel less plain.
Bought it on the nylon, had a Forstner Type O to put it on. I really like this watch as an everyday wearer that is a bit under the radar. The lume longevity could be better but the vanilla color doesn’t have a heavy fautina vibe which is a plus in my book. Drilled lugs would have been welcome. It will be a keeper for me
I was able to try one of these on when I picked up another watch at my AD. I think it has to be seen in person to really be appreciated. I tried it on the strap and it's a much more interesting looking watch compared to on the bracelet (in my opinion).
I'm glad I've got the old heritage 41mm, that watch has got a LOT of character! Love the simplistic nature of this new one and would definitely buy it, but wouldn't upgrade to it.
This watch has been growing on me and have decided to get one. I’ve been wearing a Rolex Explorer MK2 39mm with bracelet for a couple of months and really like it. That’s my M.O. when I buy a new watch for my collection and I believe the Ranger will wear similar to the Explorer.
The main complaint seems to be the printed script versus applied markers. But here’s the thing…the old rolex explorer 1016, which sells for over 20k sometimes, also has a printed script. Some people also complain about this the rangers price point, but all things considered like the movement, bracelet and sapphire crystal, its actually a very reasonable bang for your buck. I personal want one but for 10-15% under retail if possible. Lol
This is the correct take. I would absolutely love a 1016, but I can’t afford one (and frankly don’t think it’s worth what it sells for even if I had the money). So I could either get a homage, which doesn’t sit all that well with me, or buy this which is still a sort of heritage product that is really reminiscent of the 1016 Explorer without being a direct copy.
@@ProfessorPesca Yeah I just think the white space, so to speak, or rather the the black space on the dial, in combination with luminous printed script, and considering the dial is grained matte, is exactly why people like this watch. It’s just clean and simple. And I think a lot of people don’t understand just how good the movement is. KIF anti-shock systems that replace the standard incabloc typically used in ETA movements. Tudor makes very touch and durable watches. I haven’t bought the ranger yet, but I did put a deposit down on one. Now I am somewhat contemplating between the ranger and the bb 59 39mm, which is also a classic.
I like the lume color and that they are printed. It looks like a new old radium version. The explorer can have the flash with that style. I’m going with both.
I purchased this to see if I’ll like it. Purchased it for a very good price. Like Teddy I like the styling of my Sin 556 so this style of the Ranger really appeals to me. We’ll see how it is when I get it in hand and wear it for a bit! Once it comes in I’ll do an unboxing video and do updates and shore the wearing experience.
I picked up a ranger last week, I find it extremely comfortable, it really does wear large, but that is not a problem for me. The bracelet is amazing. I sold a 20-year-old sub with no date and put the money into a Pro and the Ranger and still have £1500 left! I now have 4 Tudors in the collection, ok I still have 8 Rolex watches but I am starting to ask myself why.
Many have complained about the simplicity of the word Ranger and greenish lume. Many may not realized that the original vintage Ranger uses only “Ranger” and also uses greenish lume. This watch is a reflection of the original vintage Ranger just like the BB58 and BB54 uses the DNA of Tudor Submariner 1958 and 1954.
Nicely done review, At the end of the day, there's nothing here that is eye-catching, impactful, or different. Overall I like Tudor, but there's nothing here to get excited about.
Watch prices are all over the place when looking at different manufacturers. I was just looking at the Vertex M100. I think, off the shelf, the watch costs the same as Tudor....and it only has a Sellita movement. The Ranger may not appeal to everyone but with the manufactured movement and Tudor's overall quality I think this is a great deal. It's all subjective, but I would purchase it.
After seeing this watch I chose to keep my 41mm version instead. It’s a much better looking watch in my opinion. The Rose logo, the color of the markers, the Red second hand, the straight end link bracelet all help to make the 79910 a better and more interesting choice for me. And having a generous 8” wrist the 41mm size is not an issue. And the ETA movement is a times tested, easily serviced workhorse.
I feel ironically that this is less the 2nd choice or "poor mans" Exp39 than say the Black Bays are to the Sub. I have an Exp39 and it's a great one. Although, the sharpness in appearance due to the polished bezel and raised/applied indices gives it an OP meets a Datejust level of dressiness. This Tuder is bones cool. Has a Panerai Base toolishness to it. For me anyway. I'd buy it.
You can't convey the experience of this watch on video...as great as your videos are, Teddy!:) I checked it out recently at Bucherer, and liked it far more than expected. It's a heavy, in a good way, slab o'brushed steel. The dial may be a bit blah, but you what attracts is the thing itself, in it's entirety. And how you feel wearing it. I came very close to going for it. It's low key masculine class.
what recommendations do you have for a watch with the following specs: - to be min 500$ - max 1,500-2,000$ - to have the mechanism visible, and the mechanism should preferably be in-house mechanical, to make a sensation when the watch is turned back. Although it's a small budget, which watch do you think puts on a real show with the mechanism? It doesn't matter the brand of the watch
Looking at the watch, the only thing that I don't like are the hands. I am fine with Tudor doing something different with the hands but the ones they went with are not my cup of tea.
Thank you for that very objective Vid. I got my ranger two weeks after the release. I like the simplicity of this watch. I bought it on the Natostrap, but I changed the strap to a brown leather strap with a vintage look.
There’s nothing wrong with the watch. It’s going to have great appeal to a decent number of people. The watch is intended as a daily wear and to those who get it, they’ll probably grow to like it even more over time. That said, such a watch, it should also be offered in a smaller size. It’s simply a part of the DNA and as objects, they look great -small. The power reserve is great, but for a daily wear with no date complication, who cares if it stops running over one’s weekend? This design would have benefited from a less expensive ETA, allowing for a slimmer profile. The only thing I find superior on the previous generation Ranger missing here are drilled lugs. Major bummer not to have them here. I think the watch is fine but its appeal is simply going to be a bit limited. I read through the comments, there were comparisons to the Longines Spirit for example. Those are very beautiful watches and likely better value, but they scratch a different itch.
As usual a great video Teddy, I just love your channel with all the great content. But I was wondering if it would be possible to make a video like this one, but on an other Tudor model. And that is the Tudor Royal. I think this is a beautiful watch and a great affordable alternative for someone who is not so charmed by Rolex.
I'm one of those "weird" guys who actually prefer the shovel hour hand to the snowflake hand on the diver models. Not typically a fan of painted on markers, but eh, it's part of the model DNA. About the only thing that bugs me is the slab side case which gives it a visual cue of being thicker than a Rolex Submariner, even though the Sub is technically a millimeter thicker. I'm also wondering whether the Ranger has improved shock resistance - like the Rolex Explorer - but I'm guessing that was left as an Explorer exclusive.
I love how polarising this watch is, as a fan of tool watches I think this is great, the flatness of the dial makes it highly legible at a glance like many of my pilot watches. The fully brushed case means I don't have to baby it when I'm wearing it. I think this might be the biggest issue with the watch is that it's a Tudor and therefore people are looking at it as a luxury watch... like people who don't dive criticising the details of a dive watch the criticism that this is too plain kind of misses the point of the watch when you're outdoors carrying a load of equipment. I've never liked the BB58 or 36 and up until the FXD (also controversial) I didn't understand the hype about Tudor... but together with the BB Pro and now this I really think Tudor are filling the gap of when Rolex used to make tool watches rather than insane luxury pieces that you would never wear for their intended use. The only thing for me is the colour of the lume on the hands and dial are slightly different but otherwise I'm a big fan of this watch.
This seems like an awesome piece, but someone pointed out that the hour hand resembles a butt plug and I cannot unsee it which unfortunately kills the whole deal for me.
Hi Teddy, I think the "flatness" of the dial being very basic and simple is a break from the moderness of the watch today as many like myself who want vintage watches like old Rolex explorers which isn't really bad as this is what the watch is going for apart from the utilitarian theme. For me I think the price is a bit steep for my budget, the Seiko MM300 is still on my radar so the decision is easy. I like field watches also, for this I will buy the new Seiko 5 field which is in the same vein.
Someone did a video on this watch and called the hour hand a "butt plug hand" now i will never look at it the same 😂. I do love it. But i thought that was hilarious.
There's one thing about this watch that strikes me as being odd. It's the lume on the minute hand. Why does it stop so short of the point of the hand. I know this sounds ridiculous, but once I've seen it, I can't un-see it.
Nice review! I’ve got mine on order now. Put me in the oold school explorer camp. Here is a take from a knife and firearms enthusiast. If your gun slide or blade look like a billboard it’s often considered a negative. I like less crap on my dials. Keep it clean folks.
I'm always amused by people complaining about how "boring" a field watch is. If you bling it up, it stops being a field watch. Maybe people just expect more of a $3,000 watch, but the problem, I think, is in the very concept of a $3,000 field watch. I do think it's a good price for that movement; my only complaint would be that the giant numerals are cartoonishly large on a dial of this size. I'd be interested in a smaller variant, preferably on that black strap (which looks awesome.)
i think the trouble is that 3000 dollars is entry level luxury watch level. and a field watch is not meant to be that, it's meant to be a mil spec watch that you can take through a war zone. there are some tool watches that are tastefully designed and their simplicity and elegance makes more versatile than they should be, thus proving better value but this doesn't do that. and nor does it fall into the seiko 5 field watch catagory of it is so inexpensive you aren't worried what happens to it. so it's in a weird middle ground.
Noone wants to "bling it up" - the main complaints are the samt that you have. It looks very cheap due to the large negative space and due to the really strange color.
I bought the ranger and love it. It feels better on wrist than in photos. Anyway, it's okay that many people hate it and dislike this model and express numerous negative thoughts. It just make me realize that I really bought it solely becos "I like it" but not becos "others like it".
amazing watch love it
I love it 🎉
got one last Xmas! loving it too.
Ranger is a nice watch sub $2000. I would never pay full MSRP for it.
I simply do not understand those who seek validation or approval when deciding on a watch. It's sad. I ALWAYS buy what I like and don't give a single shit about what anyone else thinks.
Ordered my Ranger yesterday. This is a sleeper that will only appeal to those who really want simplicity and durability. I'd guess most will think it's too simple, boring, whatever aesthetically, but to me it's perfect and exactly what I want in a high-quality field watch. You have to see it in the flesh to appreciate it, the dial has some great texturing. Will keep it forever, and hope to get many battle scars on it throughout the years :) Thanks for the great vid!
Do u still have it? are u still wearing it?
@@relosapulso My order arrived at my AD about a week ago, I'll be picking it up in a few weeks.
@@tmh44 awesome congrats!
@@relosapulso thanks friend!
My kind of watch. To complain it's boring is to completely miss the point IMHO. Let this Tudor be the kind of watch Rolex doesn't even make anymore. A simple, functional field watch that is about clarity of form and simplicity of function. It's superb.
The design of this model was just what I was looking for in my next watch. The clean unassuming face with a brushed steel case/bracelet and solid build quality that doesn't attract attention. This fits my style of a luxury daily driver like a Toyota Land Cruiser, well done Tudor.
This was my first watch. I graduated about a year ago and got a great job so I’d been out on the prowl for months and when the Ranger got released I emailed the AD straight away. I was lucky enough to get the first one in my city. I love it so much and every time I look at it I just feel proud. I actually like it’s simplicity and I wouldn’t have it any other way.
Not a bad first watch lol
I loved this watch from the moment I first saw a picture of it. I went into a shop and tried it on a couple of months or so and immediately made the decision to reserve one. I picked up today (after it arrived a about a week ago) and I absolutely love it. I own a Rolex Datejust in steel and white gold that I got new in 1985, plus I bought a new Panerai Radiomir Black Seal in 2008. This Tudor Ranger is right up there with those two watches. All of the negative comments about “too boring”, “ not eye catching” is exactly what I like about it. Its classic and simple styling make it a tour de force. Less is more.
you gotta remember that much of teddy's audience is into man-jewelry and bro recognition. i have owned many luxury watches over the years but swore off a decade ago. nevertheless i have a ranger on the way now 😄
I just bought one last week. It was our families first time on a cruise and I was also celebrating my 10 year anniversary of starting my own business. I could not possibly be any happier. It’s my first Tudor. I own several Omegas, a couple of Oris watches, some Hamilton’s (new and vintage), I also have some micro brands I learned about from your videos Ocean Crawler, Traska and Vaer. I am super impressed and in Love with the Ranger.
One thing that is often overlooked with the dial design is that it really closely matches the aesthetic of state and national park ranger uniforms, at least the ones here in the US. It’s not a sexy uniform but is highly functional and distinct. Kind of like hiking pants lol
Love this watch. The simplicity of the dial, quality and design. What a magnificent tool watch. Thanks for the video
Love this new Ranger! I didn't like the outgoing one at all, so this is a big improvement, especially with the in-house movement! I would say that this model is best described as a "Black Bay-ized" Ranger. Which I think is a logical move, since the Black Bay is so popular. This approach works well for the Ranger, and gives it continuity with Tudor's other sport models. While it lacks a little of the original Ranger's charm and gracefulness, it does make the new Ranger more sporty and solidifies it as a modern Tool Watch. The small, original case being lifted from the Prince, which was of course more of a dress model and didn't quite work for it's purpose as a robust sports watch. Also, the new look further differentiates it from the traditional Oyster styling of current Rolex models. All these new models have done the seemingly impossible task of giving the modern Tudor brand its own separate look while still retaining some of its Rolex design cues. The only puzzling thing about the new Ranger is why there is no dial reference to its seemingly Chronometer movement. Do we know its COSC for sure?
Bought my Ranger on Saint Barts. Clean lines and unpretentious. This flies under the radar with class. Having this watch, I probably won’t wear my Rolex Sub very much.
I think a lot of people don't "get" the watch, so they criticize it because they are trying to make it something it isn't. It's intended to be a classic tool field watch, made with modern technology.
The Ranger is not trying to be a BB, or a modern Old Ladies Broach (Explorer). If that's the look you want, buy a BB36, or get on the waiting list for an Old Ladies Broach.
Absolutely agree with you. Futhermore the watch looks so much better in person. I'm very happy with mine and really love the mix of modern and vintage design.
Rather buy a IWC or a Hamilton then
@@ekimandersom4478 Hamilton are nice, but not on the level of Tudor. I wasn't aware IWC made simple field watch, I thought they were mostly pilot's watches.
Perfectly said. You get how the watch is intended to be which a lot of people don’t. It’s a great everyday watch and being all brushed stays under the radar and can take a scuff here and there and not notice
@@Furniture121 IWC has a nice field watch in titanium and bronze
The only Rolex I ever wanted was the Rolex Explorer. But this Tudor Ranger looks far closer to the era of Explorer that I like than the current offerings from Rolex. Cheaper too... bonus.
I think it looks much better in person. I have been able to checkout all three options. The bracelet and clasp are amazing, especially for the price point. If I was looking for a watch that could go anywhere and do anything I think the bracelet is the best, but for someone looking for a tool watch they will wear hiking or casually I think their nato strap looks the best. It adds some color, helps the bit of red on the seconds hand pop and really gives it a rugged field ready esthetic. The black rubber strap also looks great, and is very comfortable. If I wanted versatility, but lived somewhere hot, or wanted to keep it under 3k the rubber strap is perfect.
yep. i'll wear mine on a single pass nylon strap because it'll be an actual field/work watch. as nice as the bracelet is i figure it'll fetch 900 on ebay bringing my cost basis down below 2k for my new ranger
I bought the Ranger two days ago and love it. I commented to the AD that my dream watch was the ROLEX Explorer 36mm but had never tried it on - they got one out of the back room and let me try it and then told me waiting list no too bad 18 months to 2years and offered to put me on the waiting list - perfect outcome for me! Time to save up!
I really like the Ranger 39mm and the old 36mm without the date or with the date, I really like the numeral layout and the sizing of the numbers and the 3 6 9 layout over the other field watch layouts. You always do a great program Teddy.
I just ordered one myself, paid $2,400 for “used brand new” stock condition. But I have to wait a month to get it so the video helps with the wait. I want a boring, badass watch that won’t raise too many eyebrows…when I wear my aqua terra, people think I’m super rich/spoiled, when that’s not actually true. This watch is very nice and flies under the radar. I think it’s a home run!
No one knows what watch you’re wearing, especially an Omega lol
I have a number of watches including Rolex seadweller, dateless sub and a couple of others and bought this. Didn’t go looking for it but the finish and in house movement took my eye and I was impressed though the scarcity of any Rolex but mainly the sports ones means it was a great piece for fair money. Delighted with the watch I can see why some may say it has a boring face but I like the no fuss, good size face add to its history (though I agree tentative). Great functional no frills look suits what I want. Delighted and just thought I would share
Great review. I own the new Tudor and opted for the hybrid rubber strap. It simply looks great and wears amazingly well. The key for me was getting over the 39mm case, as I found my BB58 Navy Blue a little on the small size. The larger dial on the Ranger ticks those boxes. The T-Fit clasp like on my other BB58 Boutique Bronze is just fantastic and affords you the ability to adjust on the fly as temperatures affect your wearability. I like the printed numerals and one dimensional look on the hybrid rubber, it just works so well. The price is great considering you're getting pedigree in the MT COSC certified engine. The sapphire domed crystal also makes it all pull together. Fabulous review as always
The Ranger has a great movement, case, bracelet and build quality. I have issues with the dial, which looks too plain for the price. This is due to a combination of factors: too much negative space, a boring font, printed indices and an odd lume color. I own a BB58, which is my favorite watch in my collection. But I'll wait for my AD to get me a 36mm Explorer.
have you looked at the BB 36?
@@andre_reis Yes but I greatly prefer the 36mm Explorer. The BB36, to my eyes, looks like a diver missing its timing bezel.
I think I prefer this dial to the explorer tbh
I like the lack of text on this dial. The Rolex explorer and other watches over explain their features in the dial text. If you care about watches you know what it does. If you don’t care about watches you won’t give a damn anyway. Less clutter makes it easier to read.
@@dannyg6592 new bb36 due soon I reckon based on the s and g variant, chronometer and hopefully some new styling
Great review, Teddy! I just got my Ranger on-bracelet and couldn’t be happier with it.
Really looking forward to putting this thing through its paces
Huge Tudor fan generally. My advice here though is to stick to the Black Bay range (incl. 58, GMT & Chrono) Get the Explorer (if you can) as opposed to the Ranger for this style watch. The white gold applied markers are much nicer than the greeny painted markers here imho.
Fully agree with you. The black bays have a great look and feel to them. The Ranger isn't on that same level.
Fully agree with you. The black bays have a great look and feel to them. The Ranger isn't on that same level.
Thank you for this comment. There's no reason to choose this field watch over the Explorer. Explorer can do everything the Ranger can, and way more.
@@izzythomas848 what can it do more? Date? A looot more expensive?
@@OhDearBabajan Explorer is more versatile, that was the point.
As soon as the new Tudor Ranger release was announced I put in my order. I love the simple dial, domed crystal and the unique handset. The smaller size compared to the previous Heritage Ranger version is a big improvement. It’s been running about +1 second a day for the past week. I’m really happy with this purchase.
I’d still take a BB36 over this. You can find one on a bracelet used for $2k. It’s much nicer looking, better finishing and easy to service movement.
This is a great looking watch and ✅ all the boxes. Sub 40mm dial, no "exhibition" caseback, no date complication. Simple elegance.
I have this watch and the 41mm, the 41mm was always a bit big, this is an upgrade in many ways and wears really. I like the minimalist look of the dial.
I bought the Tudor Ranger 39mm on a bracelet as soon as it came out. The Ranger is low-key and uncomplicated. A perfect no-nonsense field watch I can wear everywhere I go.
I really like this watch and I am speaking as someone who doesn't usually care for Tudor/ Rolex watches in general. The dial is simple and practical. The sizing is perfect. The bracelet and strap options are good. The in house 4hz movement is great. If I had a gripe at all I would like raised/applied numerals but that is a decent trade-off for the price overall.
This is a Tudor I would actually buy.
Raised markers give the watch a more fancy look. I‘m glad the dial is printed…
I hope there will be a date version of this watch.
I personally wouldn't sell this watch as a "beginners" luxury watch. A "beginner" wants a deal of bling for their hard earned $3000. This is definitely not that! This is a specialist watch for those that want very comfortable wear, incredibly clear time, and a take every wear ability without being scared of theft or the odd scratch. The chamfering on the side and bubble sapphire lend a jewellery feel that's surprising. A top travellers watch, very well balanced, accurate movement, very comfortable, thin, small lug to lug and one that just gets worn an awful lot against the heavier, blingier and much more expensive pieces in my collection.
I love the new Ranger and bracelet, honestly wouldn’t change a thing. Really like Tudor’s more retro designs, guess I’m getting a bit nostalgic in my old age.
Teddy, you are my first stop in my journey for watch buying. Thank you for all of your shared knowledge, advice and opinions regarding all things horology.
I tried it on at my AD and took the plunge this evening. Thanks for the helpful review and great vid. I had been wanting a GMT and the current Tudor GMT and the BB Pro just didn’t lead to love on my 6.5” wrist but the Ranger did.
Excellent video! This is yet another evidence that Tudor is becoming its own brand. I just added the Panda Black Bay Chrono in my collection and I couldn’t be happier with its design and quality… unmistakably Tudor.
Another outstanding video Teddy, I was fortunate enough to get my hands on this at release date. This is my 8th Tudor. I had an explorer and it was kinda like meeting your hero, got bored with it and got rid of it ultimately. So I’m more than happy now.
Very interesting to hear your unconventional ownership history here, my friend! Enjoy the new Ranger, sounds like he has good company in your collection haha.
Wow you got bored of the Explorer but replaced it with the Ranger!? 😆 Well if it worked for you… 👍🏻
@@KeepingWatchUK Yeah it is like selling your Porsche and getting a Beatle, but if it works for him. Beatle has a lot of charm and totally niche though.
@@alexlilano1931 If selling your Porsche at a huge profit (aka flipping) and a beetle was equally fast and cool maybe 😂
@@TeddyBaldassarre Wills Meg is just flexing lol.
I have got every single recent hot Tudor (I passed on the Ceramic 🤮) at release date 🥱 (9 now Meg and no mediocre BB58 either) and I do not even own a 🤵🏻♂️🤣🤣🤣🤣
10th should be early Sept. 😈 Keep up 🏃🏻♂️
Those complaining about the Ranger release know nothing about the heritage of this model. Please refer to vintage references 7965, 7991, 7995, 7996, 7966, 90020, 90200, 90220.
There's nothing boring about this new release.
Back in the day, people who wore a Ranger had a life, did cool things, the watch was along for the ride. It seems like in 2022, watch people don't leave the internet, and keep their watches in the box in the safe. They want "excitement" from merely owning their watch. it's sad.
I’m putting my name down for the Ranger, it’s the watch I’ve been waiting for. Will pair nicely with my BB36
i LOVE IT....simple. Bought one last week
I think this scratches a lot of peoples Explorer 1 itches. The logo on the dial which isn't a thief/mugger magnet is also a pro for me.
The main thing putting me off this watch is the printed rather than applied numerals and indices. Currently, I would easily choose the much-much cheaper Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical over this…give it quality applied indices though and neutral white SuperLuminova and things might change.
you have a great way of explaining things without repeating yourself. the way you explained the the function of the T clasp perfectly clarified the questions i had
This is exactly the video I need right now
I've had hands on with this piece and having applied markers and a stronger lume would lift it's overall appeal IMO. I have a couple of Tudors and this one just looks rather flat and one dimensional for me.
I couldn’t agree more.
Great perspective, Teddy (as usual).
I tried one of these at my local AD and it fit well. Love the “former” Explorer vibe. The printed face is nice (see: vintage Explorers that everyone seems to love) - whereas the new Explorer seems a bit too flashy for a tool watch.
Bottom Line: I’ll stick with my 41mm Heritage Ranger. I like the red seconds hand and bigger face, despite the fact that I have a small wrist. I just like the look better. It’s also great on a NATO or silicone strap.
I bought one yesterday! It's half the price of my Date-just. My only negative is that of the hour markers look unfinished. It's self winding movement is nice! I plan to wear it daily.
I bought it when it first came out on the hybrid strap and love it! Its the perfect do it all watch while being understated but really well made. Would've preferred a 37-38mm case but am very happy with 39. I also feel that the strap breaks up the steel well and makes it pop a bit more and makes it feel less plain.
Bought it on the nylon, had a Forstner Type O to put it on. I really like this watch as an everyday wearer that is a bit under the radar. The lume longevity could be better but the vanilla color doesn’t have a heavy fautina vibe which is a plus in my book. Drilled lugs would have been welcome. It will be a keeper for me
I was able to try one of these on when I picked up another watch at my AD. I think it has to be seen in person to really be appreciated. I tried it on the strap and it's a much more interesting looking watch compared to on the bracelet (in my opinion).
Nice review! For me watchs simplicity is the reason i wanna get one
I'm glad I've got the old heritage 41mm, that watch has got a LOT of character! Love the simplistic nature of this new one and would definitely buy it, but wouldn't upgrade to it.
It’s simple, what a field watch (tool watch) supposed to be. Thanks for the vid!
This watch has been growing on me and have decided to get one. I’ve been wearing a Rolex Explorer MK2 39mm with bracelet for a couple of months and really like it. That’s my M.O. when I buy a new watch for my collection and I believe the Ranger will wear similar to the Explorer.
Great video as always, and I love this new Ranger. I am saving up for it. I think it would be a great everyday wear watch
I agree. I don’t like the look of dive watches but want a quality, do-it-all watch.
The main complaint seems to be the printed script versus applied markers. But here’s the thing…the old rolex explorer 1016, which sells for over 20k sometimes, also has a printed script. Some people also complain about this the rangers price point, but all things considered like the movement, bracelet and sapphire crystal, its actually a very reasonable bang for your buck. I personal want one but for 10-15% under retail if possible. Lol
This is the correct take. I would absolutely love a 1016, but I can’t afford one (and frankly don’t think it’s worth what it sells for even if I had the money). So I could either get a homage, which doesn’t sit all that well with me, or buy this which is still a sort of heritage product that is really reminiscent of the 1016 Explorer without being a direct copy.
@@ProfessorPesca Yeah I just think the white space, so to speak, or rather the the black space on the dial, in combination with luminous printed script, and considering the dial is grained matte, is exactly why people like this watch. It’s just clean and simple. And I think a lot of people don’t understand just how good the movement is. KIF anti-shock systems that replace the standard incabloc typically used in ETA movements. Tudor makes very touch and durable watches. I haven’t bought the ranger yet, but I did put a deposit down on one. Now I am somewhat contemplating between the ranger and the bb 59 39mm, which is also a classic.
The slightly greenish numbers remind me of early Porsche 911 dash dials, and for that I like it!
Honestly, if you are about to buy this watch, look at Baltany. Fraction of the price, excellent finishing and solid NH35 / NH38 movements.
The watch is for whoever likes it. I have one of the original oyster prince rangers from the 60s! It may have even been to Vietnam!
I like the lume color and that they are printed. It looks like a new old radium version. The explorer can have the flash with that style. I’m going with both.
I purchased this to see if I’ll like it. Purchased it for a very good price. Like Teddy I like the styling of my Sin 556 so this style of the Ranger really appeals to me. We’ll see how it is when I get it in hand and wear it for a bit! Once it comes in I’ll do an unboxing video and do updates and shore the wearing experience.
I picked up a ranger last week, I find it extremely comfortable, it really does wear large, but that is not a problem for me. The bracelet is amazing. I sold a 20-year-old sub with no date and put the money into a Pro and the Ranger and still have £1500 left! I now have 4 Tudors in the collection, ok I still have 8 Rolex watches but I am starting to ask myself why.
Many have complained about the simplicity of the word Ranger and greenish lume. Many may not realized that the original vintage Ranger uses only “Ranger” and also uses greenish lume. This watch is a reflection of the original vintage Ranger just like the BB58 and BB54 uses the DNA of Tudor Submariner 1958 and 1954.
Man! you are the Tom Holland of the watches! Congrats! I have just discovered you channel! GReat job!!!
Im a big fan of this watch Tudor has done a great job.
Nicely done review, At the end of the day, there's nothing here that is eye-catching, impactful, or different. Overall I like Tudor, but there's nothing here to get excited about.
Watch prices are all over the place when looking at different manufacturers. I was just looking at the Vertex M100. I think, off the shelf, the watch costs the same as Tudor....and it only has a Sellita movement. The Ranger may not appeal to everyone but with the manufactured movement and Tudor's overall quality I think this is a great deal. It's all subjective, but I would purchase it.
After seeing this watch I chose to keep my 41mm version instead. It’s a much better looking watch in my opinion.
The Rose logo, the color of the markers, the Red second hand, the straight end link bracelet all help to make the 79910 a better and more interesting choice for me. And having a generous 8” wrist the 41mm size is not an issue.
And the ETA movement is a times tested, easily serviced workhorse.
Fits my style/lifestyle perfectly. So I ordered one right away and I’m expecting it in about two weeks
I feel ironically that this is less the 2nd choice or "poor mans" Exp39 than say the Black Bays are to the Sub. I have an Exp39 and it's a great one. Although, the sharpness in appearance due to the polished bezel and raised/applied indices gives it an OP meets a Datejust level of dressiness. This Tuder is bones cool. Has a Panerai Base toolishness to it. For me anyway. I'd buy it.
Very happy to see this one back. The new size is perfect.
I am absolutely in love with the Ranger once I saw it in person I instantly pre ordered it
You can't convey the experience of this watch on video...as great as your videos are, Teddy!:) I checked it out recently at Bucherer, and liked it far more than expected. It's a heavy, in a good way, slab o'brushed steel. The dial may be a bit blah, but you what attracts is the thing itself, in it's entirety. And how you feel wearing it. I came very close to going for it. It's low key masculine class.
what recommendations do you have for a watch with the following specs:
- to be min 500$ - max 1,500-2,000$
- to have the mechanism visible, and the mechanism should preferably be in-house mechanical, to make a sensation when the watch is turned back. Although it's a small budget, which watch do you think puts on a real show with the mechanism?
It doesn't matter the brand of the watch
Looking at the watch, the only thing that I don't like are the hands. I am fine with Tudor doing something different with the hands but the ones they went with are not my cup of tea.
I'm excited to see this watch in person. The new Ranger is exactly what I'm looking for in a do it all watch.
I like how the hands don't look freeky, unlike other Toodr watches and Rolex watches. Mostly I LOVE it's now a normal sized watches 😍
I really like this model, except the hour hand.
I am in agreement with you. I like the model, but the hour hand is too short, but a better design than the snowflake in my opinion.
If they went snowflake people would have probably complained about that too. Hard to win as a watch designer nowadays haha.
Butt plug hands.
It’s a bit phallic, but I’d rather have this hour hand over the snowflake on the BB, which would’ve looked really out of place on this watch
@@TeddyBaldassarre too right. How about offering multiple hand options?
I love the printed dial! Rolex ruined the Explorer with the applied indices. This has the same tool watch vibe as the old 1016.
Another great video Mr. Bulbasaur
Teddy been killing it - great video on a watch I have been considering. Thank you!
I really like this watch, and in general I love simple, field/pilot designs. Still, there’s just something missing aesthetically.
Great job, Teddy!! I think this watch will be a strap monster!!
Thank you for that very objective Vid. I got my ranger two weeks after the release. I like the simplicity of this watch. I bought it on the Natostrap, but I changed the strap to a brown leather strap with a vintage look.
There’s nothing wrong with the watch. It’s going to have great appeal to a decent number of people. The watch is intended as a daily wear and to those who get it, they’ll probably grow to like it even more over time.
That said, such a watch, it should also be offered in a smaller size. It’s simply a part of the DNA and as objects, they look great -small. The power reserve is great, but for a daily wear with no date complication, who cares if it stops running over one’s weekend? This design would have benefited from a less expensive ETA, allowing for a slimmer profile.
The only thing I find superior on the previous generation Ranger missing here are drilled lugs. Major bummer not to have them here.
I think the watch is fine but its appeal is simply going to be a bit limited. I read through the comments, there were comparisons to the Longines Spirit for example. Those are very beautiful watches and likely better value, but they scratch a different itch.
I went for the Sinn 556A instead and love it so far! Plus it has a date window
As usual a great video Teddy, I just love your channel with all the great content. But I was wondering if it would be possible to make a video like this one, but on an other Tudor model. And that is the Tudor Royal. I think this is a beautiful watch and a great affordable alternative for someone who is not so charmed by Rolex.
I'm one of those "weird" guys who actually prefer the shovel hour hand to the snowflake hand on the diver models. Not typically a fan of painted on markers, but eh, it's part of the model DNA. About the only thing that bugs me is the slab side case which gives it a visual cue of being thicker than a Rolex Submariner, even though the Sub is technically a millimeter thicker. I'm also wondering whether the Ranger has improved shock resistance - like the Rolex Explorer - but I'm guessing that was left as an Explorer exclusive.
At exactly the same price point as the BB36 you get the T-fit and in house mvt with 72 power reserve.
Yup. I think that’s good value. If the BB36 gets the t-fit and movement like the S&G did, look out Explorer.
Just measured mine, it’s 12mm thick. Good review thanks!
I love how polarising this watch is, as a fan of tool watches I think this is great, the flatness of the dial makes it highly legible at a glance like many of my pilot watches. The fully brushed case means I don't have to baby it when I'm wearing it. I think this might be the biggest issue with the watch is that it's a Tudor and therefore people are looking at it as a luxury watch... like people who don't dive criticising the details of a dive watch the criticism that this is too plain kind of misses the point of the watch when you're outdoors carrying a load of equipment. I've never liked the BB58 or 36 and up until the FXD (also controversial) I didn't understand the hype about Tudor... but together with the BB Pro and now this I really think Tudor are filling the gap of when Rolex used to make tool watches rather than insane luxury pieces that you would never wear for their intended use.
The only thing for me is the colour of the lume on the hands and dial are slightly different but otherwise I'm a big fan of this watch.
This seems like an awesome piece, but someone pointed out that the hour hand resembles a butt plug and I cannot unsee it which unfortunately kills the whole deal for me.
Hi Teddy, I think the "flatness" of the dial being very basic and simple is a break from the moderness of the watch today as many like myself who want vintage watches like old Rolex explorers which isn't really bad as this is what the watch is going for apart from the utilitarian theme. For me I think the price is a bit steep for my budget, the Seiko MM300 is still on my radar so the decision is easy. I like field watches also, for this I will buy the new Seiko 5 field which is in the same vein.
I just got mine and I love it😊
Someone did a video on this watch and called the hour hand a "butt plug hand" now i will never look at it the same 😂. I do love it. But i thought that was hilarious.
There's one thing about this watch that strikes me as being odd.
It's the lume on the minute hand. Why does it stop so short of the point of the hand. I know this sounds ridiculous, but once I've seen it, I can't un-see it.
Nice review! I’ve got mine on order now. Put me in the oold school explorer camp. Here is a take from a knife and firearms enthusiast. If your gun slide or blade look like a billboard it’s often considered a negative. I like less crap on my dials. Keep it clean folks.
totally agree.
Just bought one earlier today. Thanks for the review.
I'm always amused by people complaining about how "boring" a field watch is. If you bling it up, it stops being a field watch. Maybe people just expect more of a $3,000 watch, but the problem, I think, is in the very concept of a $3,000 field watch.
I do think it's a good price for that movement; my only complaint would be that the giant numerals are cartoonishly large on a dial of this size. I'd be interested in a smaller variant, preferably on that black strap (which looks awesome.)
i think the trouble is that 3000 dollars is entry level luxury watch level. and a field watch is not meant to be that, it's meant to be a mil spec watch that you can take through a war zone. there are some tool watches that are tastefully designed and their simplicity and elegance makes more versatile than they should be, thus proving better value but this doesn't do that. and nor does it fall into the seiko 5 field watch catagory of it is so inexpensive you aren't worried what happens to it. so it's in a weird middle ground.
Noone wants to "bling it up" - the main complaints are the samt that you have. It looks very cheap due to the large negative space and due to the really strange color.
Strange but dispite my Rolex, Omega and other Tudor watches, this Ranger on the rubber strap is my no.1 watch
I would jump on it, if I wouldn't have a 556i and a bb pro on it way to me. I wish Tudor would have made the Ranger a little bit smaller.