R7 2700X - AMD GOES BIG! Gaming, Rendering & Encoding
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 жов 2024
- How does AMD's new Ryzen 2700X stack up in benchmarks against Intel's i7 8700K and other CPUs? Short answer - very well!
Amazon
AMD RYZEN 7 2700X: amzn.to/2qM5hhU
AMD RYZEN 7 2700: amzn.to/2J9u7QJ
AMD RYZEN 5 2600X: amzn.to/2J8vgI3
AMD RYZEN 5 2600: amzn.to/2J7CFr3
MSI X470 Gaming M7 AC: amzn.to/2HeSJa0
Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming 7: amzn.to/2F0bNqv
Intel Core i7 8700K: amzn.to/2HKoetI
Intel Core i5 8600K: amzn.to/2HbTzEl
Intel Core i5 8400: amzn.to/2HNpHj2
Intel Core i3 8100: amzn.to/2HcdrLB
NCASE M1 Mods: optimumtechmed...
Current gear!
Sony a6300: geni.us/IrGrgYY
Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN: amzn.to/2CjRC7h
Sigma 19mm f/2.8 DN ART: geni.us/zUCgeLp
Sigma 30mm f/1.4 DC DN: geni.us/OqYZS
Sony OSS 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6: geni.us/pbto
Twitter: / optimumtechyt
Instagram: / alisayed3
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Honestly, this is one of the most detailed and specific videos that tests the new Ryzen cpus against other cpus. I must say, the content is amazing and very in depth. Great job man 👍
Not bad. Not bad at all. If AMD keep this up then my next CPU, that I intend to buy in 2019, will be an AMD R7 3700X. Until then, my delided i7 4790k will have to do the job.
that's what im going for ever since i first heard it's going to be in 7nm
Yeah that's probably what I will get too. Until then my delided 7700k should be good enough.
Note that you may be forced to switch sooner if a smeltdown bug exploit goes wild. Intel board partners are for the vast majority not providing motherboard updates for older than Skylake CPUs so you are not protected at all. Remember that the OS part is completely worthless without the motherboard part for smeltdown so basically, all Intel users with older than Skylake CPUs are sitting on a ticking time bomb (myself included with my Xeon which I will upgrade to a Threadripper 2000 series later this year).
Samsonite Dove even TR 1950x will reach 4.1Ghz and it's allready so amazing and allso the price is amazing... sadly no budget motherboard on TR...
Agreed. Well, I'm still rocking an FX-8350 which has served me well. But I'm finally going to upgrade to the 2700x. But we should see even bigger and better improvements come the true "Zen 2". 7nm is going to be sick.
All games benchmark average on GTX 1080 Ti
i7-8700k (stock) = 10 fps more
R7-2700x (stock) = 10 fps less
Think about this for a second, what if you have GTX 1080, 1070 or below, the R7-2700x is completely a beast gaming CPU. There won't be bottleneck at all, so why are you saying R7-2700x is not as good as 8700k for gaming? That's a mislead.
Also, while the R7-2700x has more cores/threads and annihilated the i7-8700k in productivity benchmarks..
There is no question here that the R7 is a damn good CPU!
Because it is NOT as good so stop the fanboy nonsense. IT is cheaper and surely viable but not better.
That's true but with my 1070 ti there is like a 2fps difference in average to the i7 8700k. Definitely not worth the difference in price.
@@shaolin95 convince me............, i7 or a 2700x for gaming, game development, music production, and sketchup
@@global_mariii Easily R7 2700X
@@shaolin95 I mean, it depends, any heavily threaded workloads the Ryzen 7 2700X beats the i7 8700k. It IS better for that.
I had set my mind on Ryzen 7 2700x build. After watching a ton of reviews I'm starting to lean towards the I7-8700k, since the PC will be mainly for gaming purpose. I'd really love to give the new Ryzen a try though.
Look who's nailing the cinematography.
Glad you enjoyed!
Your Unsubscriber if you enjoy cinematography, check out Ash Tailor.
That's what I was thinking watching this like man check out these shots.
What up with your profile pix?
Riight?! I thought I accidentally clicked on HardwareCanucks for a min hahah 😂😂
1:17 the R7 2700 non-x version is 65w, not 95w
yep
Yea but that is on stock speeds
TSMC not Global Foundries. Global Foundries was 1st gen Ryzen 14nm. The 2700x boost isn't 4.25 but 4.35ghz. Some wrong information over the masses goes a long way.
Fucking hell, thats low, my R5 1600 is the same as that lmao
You're awesome mate. You're going to hit 100k subscribers soon and then skyrocket into the universe. Keep up the good work! Unbiased in-depth reviews, best cinematography of the whole youtube tech community and a great deep narrator voice.
Perfect mix, you're gonna get far, you'll see.
Wow, thanks so much! :)
Dudes, will you see the difference between 130 fps vs 120 fps, with out MSI afterburner, FPS Monitor? 1151v2 dead platform! AMD for people!
I am the owner of the 1800x processor, after two months of use I am amazed how good it is
I never dreamed to have such a processor, because an equivalent processor from intel now a year cost about $ 2,000.
I live in the poor country more precisely in Romania where my salary is $ 350, luck for us that there is AMD
all my gratitude
Get a X470 itx board (give the Asus one a try) and test it on the NCase M1 for the D9L and other options. Your results will determine my upgrade :)
Great video!
I already pre-ordered the asrock x470 itx(asrock bc asus gave in to nvidia demands) I plan to put the evga clc 120 on it and put it into the upcoming ncase c4 case.
that's a dan case c4 tho. But thanks! Not really planning to go AIO inside the NCase M1 but I'm strongly considering the C4-SFX too for the future.
derp derp it is dan case.
very nice video, there is only one caveat I think you should have included in your video regarding warp stabilizer. to say the 8700k out performs ryzen in this task is a bit misleading. it is true that with one instance of warp stabilizer, the 8700k will outperform ryzen, however warp stabilizer is a effect that processes in the background allowing you to continue working while processing, or activating multiple instances of warp stabilizer. the 8700 k may have a marginally faster analysation time, but ryzen will be able to analyse twice as many clips at the same time making ryzen effectively faster in practical application.
Great point.
C14 4000 is expensive and also not guaranteed to work with every 1st Gen Ryzen CPU. Even so, I don't believe some of the gaming FPS numbers that show the Ryzen beating the 7700k with equal memory. Just keeping it real
Cant believe how quickly the year or so since Ryzen 1 has gone...
Yeah, Toby. It seems like only yesterday when Ryzen 1 was hitting the shelves, yet such a lot has happened since in terms of how it shook the CPU market up.. with more exiting stuff to come! :)
the weird thing is i3-8100 was matching the R7 2700x in some cases
and very close by few frames in some cases too
so that still not worth to spent double the price
specially with the come of the 70$ only i3-9100f cpu
who beat up that R7 2700x in gaming and in single and dual core performance as cpu.userbenchmark test says .
im actually confused what to buy now sine i know that the new Intel 9th generation are that strong
i know that R5 3600 is much better then even most of R7 models and most of intel cpu's but its not available in our country and not gonna be for a while cause of some new government regulations and rules they gonna apply on electronic products shops
so the only cpu's left in our area are 9th Intel generation and ryzen 7 3700x which too expensive and waste of money
for someone who need to do like small montages in Adobe pPro from time to time and most of time doing graphic design
Thanks for the review, very informative.
I have preferred to use AMD solutions over Intel as I see Intel using its market share to push out the competition. Presently I have an AMD FX-8350 and recently ordered the Ryzen 7 - 1700, I find that the 1700 has what I need for a mix of work related issues and Gaming play. Also the price deference in the US is a little deferent then what I have seen in the EU. For instance the Ryzen 7 - 1700 is going for $229.99 While the 7 - 2700x is going for $370.00. The deference between the two is not worth the price increase for me.
So while I would like the Ryzen 7 - 2700X I’ll settle for the lowly but functional Ryzen 7 - 1700, it’s still a better and faster system then what I presently have and I do trust the longevity of the AMD products.
Thanks again for a very good and balanced review.
NV
I love that you include The Witcher 3 in the benchmarks. It's a demanding game that likes fast memory and CPUs.
B3MMi gpu s* :)
B3MMi or u were sarcastic then im stupid
Great camera work!
It seems the Ryzen 1700 performance has improved quite a bit in Battlefield 1 over the past year.
AMD and Intel's process widths are not measured in the same way and are in no way shape or form directly comparable. AMD 12nm is about equivalent to Intel 16nm though Samsung would call it 8nm. Why? Because all three companies measure their process in very different ways. Samsung devalue the currency of process shrink by measuring direct data path only. Intel have been the most honest by labelling their process as the minimum space taken up by data-path and the required surrounding area required to keep data paths distinct. When talking about the NM processes of various fabs we are not comparing like for like. Intel's current 14nm is in fact considerably tighter than AMD's new 12nm. AMD would call Intel's 14nm process 9nm or thereabouts. Samsung are just chancers. This reminds me of the old Wattage days with home hi-fi systems when Amstrad and others adopted "PMPO" (Peak music power output) and suddenly claimed 200 watt amps that were in fact about 15 watts measured in honest old "RMS".
Wow, fantastic video! I just found your channel on accident, but I was so impressed with the review I subscribed! One question though: did you actually run all those tests yourself, or are you compiling data from other sources to make these charts? (Not judging if you did, I was just genuinely confused about how one man could have so many CPUs lying around.) I have never, ever seen anyone pair a 2200G with a 1080 Ti for CPU performance testing. Great stuff!
Thanks for subscribing! All of the testing was done by me :) compiling from other sources would be a lazy mess.
No brainier this definitely has to be the finest review out till now. Damn that sublime color grading together with silky smooth video footage was a pleasure to watch❤️❤️
Vikram Bhaskar i
i just bought a 2700x for $159 at micro center. it's going to be my first amd computer, and my first build
14:10 Right. Now try streaming those games on the same Intel processor and you end up bringing it to it's knees in some cases. The Ryzen has no problems at all.
I was little confused between i7 8700k and Ryzen 7 2700x, but after this in-depth details I think I've been able to make my choice clear. I'm gonna go with Ryzen!
The 8700 k is still the king in gaming and very few people actually put the Ryzen´s potential on workload to good use. Buying a new CPU because it does well in productive environments to sit and game all day is rather silly. If you are at 1440p like me then it all matters squat when it comes to gaming, a new more powerful GPU is all that matters if you bought a top line CPU within the last 4 years, AMD or Intel. My 6700k 4,9 ghz will last me another 4-5 years if it doesn´t crumble, clock speeds are dead in the water. Very few reviewers fail to remind their viewers of the high resolution trap, most gamers I know of don´t need a new CPU. It´s baffling to think that the pentium 4 reached 5 ghz 11 years ago and we still linger there.
Pentium 4 reached 5 GHz 11 years ago. So what? The IPC improvements have come pretty far since then, otherwise you´re free to see benchmark comparisons all over the place, mate.
And yes, of course the GPU´s the most important part for gaming.
Came here to check out Premiere/After Effects performance. Thanks. An informative and neatly produced video. Kudos.
Did you built an expensive tech lab attached it to your main house? 🤔
Oh yeah!!
Early man!
I'll still be rocking my 1700 till 2021!
Still it's a killer CPU
Zoraiz Khan yeah but only for productivity and gaming at 60hz... once you try 144hz you can't really return to lower hz and at 144hz intel is the king
I don't have a 144 Hz monitor but it seems there's only a few games Intel can hit 144+ fps and in 1080. Once anyone goes beyond 1080 than it's anyone's game (pun intended).
This has been the dilemma I'm facing when getting a new system.
im running on r7 1700x @ 4ghz on a 144hz monitor and it works just fine. I dont know what you're talking about.
what the actual fuck are you talking about zoraiz khan. . . even on a 3.7ghz 1600 i game perfectly fine on my 120hz monitor. Rarely any dips below 100 fps.
Zoraiz Khan my 2700x at stock speeds does an amazing job at 1440p 144hz gaming with my 1080ti ftw3.
so like the other said, i dont know what you are talking about.
It's looking like, even while I'm mainly gaming a lot, I want to get the Ryzen. I have been recommended this in order to stream, and edit videos better.
So.. you were underwhelmed you couldn't push it any higher with a little air cooler? I'll post results when I get mine, and use it with custom water. I'll put a link to a cloud storage with OC results from my 1800x. I'll get every ounce out of this 2700x. I'm waiting to be certain there's not going to be a 2800x, and if not, the price will be lower anyway.
drive.google.com/open?id=1wHOQ4c3P2Ittm1ytKmOJ2D1wR6yprqlj
1800x (had it as high as 4.3 GHz, with a CB score of 1923, 4.2 with CB15 score of 1840, and 4.1 (everyday OC) CB15 1790).
Crosshair VI Hero (WiFi)
32 GB TridentZ 3200 cl14 (2x16 GB) running @ 3333 cl14.
After using FX-8350 in many years change to Ryzen 7 2700x - Magical.. I could go higher but I've tried to less bottleneck for my gpu, so I purchased this.. The cpu fan actually also silent - using a silent mode gaming is around 60-65* (having also enough fans) is great cpu
I hope AMD can sell Wraith Prism separately..
a lot of people may sell it when going for a 2700x a with a high end cooler
hi I am resently buy asus x470 + ryzen 2700x+flarex 3200= pc is randon reboot and I dont know hot can I fix it, I was put 1.425V what you say, and pc was stable all day, but reboot at night, can you share your other bios configuration? it can be help for me, thnx
@3:13...Can't you just use it like this and not put it in a case?(im really asking cuz if I can then I want to)
A somewhat competent review, but I can't help but notice some of your scores are a bit off (usually basing my observation on CB), your Coffee Lakes get a above what they should and your 2700X gets a tad bellow what I've seen in other tests (including the early leaks...). No clue how your OC 2700X gets higher ST score than stock, which should hit around 180 +/- 2 points, not 175...
Early leaks are based on binned CPUs with the best performance possible aimed at achieving great performance reviews in order to maximize sales.
Wait for more gaming benchmarks. We know that this man isn't biased cause he's not sponsored like bigger youtubers are, that's why his reviews are better. I wouldn´t trust any other youtuber over him to be honest.
asdfomfglol What you said has no basis in reality. Leaks are more often than not based on engineering samples or black market pre-sales, they have nothing to do with binning, if anything, they are underperforming chips more often than not. And at any rate, that's not what I was talking about.
Even 8th Gen i5 flagship with
6C/6T destroy 2nd Gen AMD highest flagship CPU with 8C/16T!
i5-9600K absolutely humiliating 2700X! AMD suck like always!
Great video and detailed content.. Try to not sound so robotic though, then you could easily be on TV!
What about building that motherboard into a Little Devil PC-V10 installing the CPU per the instructions that come with said case and see if you can overclock further, the PC-V10 has an extreme cooling solution built in.
I have to say 8700k costs more than 100 bucks than 2700x, so its definetly not worth it.
i still use Amd Fx 8370 - which is more than 50% slower than AMD Ryzen 7
I got it in a new system. I've found it 50% cheaper than launching price. 2700X works like a dream mainly for editing.
Gotta look into AMD uses less CPU then intel VS 2700x only uses 20% CPU vs 8700 intel uses 60%. While gaming.....
even Ryzen 7-2700x is best buy comparing the price to performance ratio.
WHAT ABOUT X370 board's??? I currently have my X370 ASRock Taichi and FlareX 3200 14T on BIOS P4.60 with my 1700/3.9Ghz at 1.375 Volt's... And I I can't boot into window's while keeping my overclock.. It train's the memory I think Like 4 times Becase that's what I have it set at then it BOOT's into Windows 10 But my CPU overclock is missing??? The only way I can Keep my overclock and memory speed is to smash delete and go to BIOS first hit save and exit first.. ANY Help Please!!!!!!
Can you benchmark it for DAW software such as FL studio,Cubase and Abelton?I heard all these software utilized single cores performance which is huge advantages on intel based chip
On Aorus 7 Wifi, I have gone through 3 kits of ram. Vengeance LPX, G. Skill Trident Z, none worked. Those were 8 GB 4 x2. Once I put in the store G.Skill Trident Z RGB 16 GB 8 x 2 worked finally at 3200. Also not impressed with Gigabyte Bios and software compared to MSI.
Hmm that's actually some decent improvements on 1% lows, that cache rework seems to have paid off.
Minimums are the new average
I'm all about tight frametimes.
But i also do quite some power user stuff so ryzen was already a no brainer for me last year :)
Hi, Thanks for the vid. I have a B350 mobo, and I dont want to upgrade to an x470 or any other board, but I do plan to upgrade my CPU to the 2700X. While I am currently overclocking my Ryzen 3 chip, I dont plan on overclocking the 2700X, as I dont deem it necessary. In this video you mentioned that you expect performance issues with a 2700X paired with a B350. Could you please elaborate. I believe there may be more than a few people wanting to know what you meant by that.
Here when I compare my bench with CINEBENCH_R15 I get 1780 1800 my clock set to 4.0ghz with the default cooler, I think it run pretty good for this board.
I don't have get any problem in 1 month for now.
www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/10078908
7:27 Did you post the video about why you're against the b350 board yet?
Do I plan to upgrade? That depends on the $, not the latest chip to drop. But I am very favourable towards AMD 2700 or the X model, and a new X470 motherboards. There is every likelihood that I won't have a grand & a half to spend on a new desktop in the next 12 months, so that makes the Ryzen 3000 series a very real possibility....
I do want a half TB M.2 drive or larger, I do want at least 32GB of RAM, (I have that much in my current 6700) and I have a GTX750Ti, so I'd want something a bit bigger & faster than that.
Do I NEED any of this? Not really... About the only thing I ever see now that gets near full CPU duty cycle, is when I try to boot all dozen guest virtual-machines at the same time, which I hardly ever do.
Let's look at the gaming and the video. I do spend roughly an hour a day playing a flight simulator, (FlightGear) but the 750Ti is not even at a trot for that. Nothing else I do asks a whole lot more of the video than that. If I dropped a modern first person shooter on there, things might be different, but I'm a 55 year old grand father. I don't need GTAuto to show me what chatting up hookers is like - I can remember it. Like the driving, it's probably more fun to do in real life, but it's a whole lot safer to do in a video game....
It's gonna by Ryzen 2700X in my case. Was waiting for the 2nd gen since the release of 1st gen last year. This chip is perfect (I will be using it as workstation mainly).
Small gap between parts on gaming benches. Also, I didn't see a reference to memory speeds. Is this another of these benchmarks that have the Intel parts running 3600 and the Ryzen running 3000? I seen some of those "tests" and even then the 2700x was either right with or ahead of the 8700k.. although the CAS wasn't listed at all. I have no idea why some actually post video reviews with comparisons between asymmetric setups. Especially when the same memory kit can be used in both systems.
Curious, why would you assume that I'm testing different memory speeds across the tested CPU's?
The memory used is 3200MHz C16 across *all* CPUs, unless stated otherwise (for the G4560, 2200G, i3 8100 etc.)
I'm kind of confused on what to do. I want to take advantage of the new platform memory compatibility and StoreMI and hopefully OC my 1700 much more on a X470. Or I could just keep my Gigabyte B350 Gaming 3, buy Fuzedrive and a 2700x and hope that board can handle the boost clocks?....IDK! Lol.
i picked up the Gaming & and the 2700x I have 4.3 Ghz @ 1.4 Volts stable i do not regret jumping the intel ship ( i had zero qualms i pre ordered this bad boy without hesitation) but i will say Anandtech and amd fanboys are full of shit... i can say this with certainty now that i actually have this product in my hand
What you mean?
im building a gaming rig and cant decide between the 2700x and 8700k, due to the amount of growth each cpu has, like the 8700k has all its cards out on the table where as the 2700x still has updatesthat could alow more performance. whats ur guys thoughts ?
8700k costs more than 110$ than 2700x, i think its an easy choice, isnt it?
do you need to conect a extra cable to get the rgb cooler on the 7 2700x?
Nice video!
But why no Premiere Pro dropped-frame benchmarks (timeline performance)? These are most important for editing experience. Or did i miss em?
Some youtube reviews have it and seems like 2700x have 0 fps drops.
Maybee you got the shot end of the stick on the "silicon lottery".
my ryzen 1700 4.0ghz @ 1.4v 16gb 2993mhz cl 16 17 17 17 ram B350 tomahawk
R15 scores
multi 1771
single 164
FINALLY!
Christ 1980s keyboard, ugh!
And for single threaded performance this is not a true IPC test, but rather a Max Frequency IPC, there's a big difference between the two.
And what's the "objective" when using gta5 (a shitty old 3d engine) a badly optimized old game, and PUBG a HORRID optimized game that was a broken mess from launch time until now, with glitch and crash galore?, especially since there are dozens of well made new games to choose from.
My 2700X at stock speeds running Prime 95 for one hour maintained 60C. I am using a custom watercooling system, so definitely better results vs. the stock cooler 😎
Also, I was able to run 4 x 8GB sticks of Corsair DDR4 RGB memory @ 3333Mhz. However, 3466Mhz failed. I will have to test 3400Mhz using manual settings in the BIOS as there is no SPD provided for this speed step. I used an X370 AsRock Fatal1ty Professional Gaming motherboard.
(don't worry about price) Can you guys please help me, I can't decide on whether to go for the Ryzen 2700X or the i7 8700k, I'm going to be playing games such as Fortnite and League of Legends, I will recording videos and uploading to UA-cam and will be streaming in the near future, so it would be really appreciated if you guys can help me make a decision. Thank You.
CPU = ...
GPU = EVGA 1070
RAM = 16 GB 3200
i wish i had money to buy this wonderful processor!
A 240mm AiO isn't any better than the biggest Notcua fan tho, why risk buying something expensive with more parts that can and WILL fail when you can achieve the same result with air cooling?
After 4 years with liquid cooling and various failure points (leaking swivel fittings, leaking radiator from EK and a failing pump) and a whole lot of wasted money when the radiator had a leak; 1000w psu, mobo, r9 290x, pci-e ssd and fx8350.. it's safe to say that watercooling is a waste of money.
So unless you have money to waste on new parts when something goes wrong, just go air.
AMD may have taken over a larger part of the CPU market. However intel is not complaining because it is selling very well too. What is restricting them sales numbers is GPU and memory prices. If your main focus is productivity, well you don't need much more than the cheapest 4Gb video and 8gb RAM for your multi monitor set and spreadsheets. If you are paying someone to run a desktop, pay for AC to keep the box cool, rrunning and comfortable, more productivity cheaper works. AS for a 2700 or a 8700, well until memory and GPU gets a LOT more reasonable Optimus Tech can keep talking and I will keep listening. I will continue gaming with the 5 year old system I have.
i5-8400 is the overall king at price/performance when it comes to gaming at any resolution! But I love that AMD is so competitive these days. Can't wait to see what the R7 2600 ends up being. It'll likely have similar gaming performance to the R7 2700, assuming similar clock speeds with 2 fewer cores, but can they beat the i5-8400 price?
I bought the i5-8400 for my main rig 4 months ago, as I wanted to primarily balance gaming and Adobe workloads. Adobe CC software doesn't currently take full advantage Hyper Threading with a 6 core chip in most cases, so the i5-8400 still is fantastic for editing RAW photos.
On the flip side, more cores may be more future proof, but I've gave up future proofing long ago. Just sell your platform and buy new when you need to, future-proofing is over priced! :P
I WISH people would start testing in 4K. Yes I UNDERSTAND 1080P shows the CPU performance more. Obviously! But I have a 4K monitor, and I am considering if I should "side-upgrade" or not from my 4790k! (Please also start testing more all the way back to sandy bridge, as IPC hasnt gone up much since then, there has been little reason to upgrade, but still makes it easier!) This video wasn't as useful as I had liked, but you make good content, keep it up!
Does the stock cooler fit inside the NCASE M1?
1:20 isn't the TDP on the 2700 65W?
Nice, but talking about OC, pls now compare both, Ryzen 2700X and Core i7-8700K, again with DDR4-3466 15-15-15-35 and optimized sub-Timings. Intel's gaming performance lead will melt!
That AIO is sh*t.80 degrees with 240mm AIO haha nice one
they had a sale on a mini-itx x470 and a 2700X, what could I do, no way the Noctua NH-L9i could keeps temps low, had To go to a large case to accommodate the aio, the Skyreach S4 mini will have to find something else, so far love the build, hate the case, also the MB has no optical out, very limited ports, have to use USB
Was your Intel test bench patch for Spectre and Meltdown ? The x470 comes already patched via BIOS...other test sites are showing post patch Intel systems at lower performance relative to 2700x. There are also variables still in play with memory...some memory brands, due to sub timings, perform substantially better on x470 than others...Geil in particular was well below competing memory brands when tested on x470 and it appears even within brands there are performance differences...
Good video, thanks. I appreciated the PUBG analysis. I'm going for a 2700x upgrade. Even though it's primarily for gaming, I refuse to invest in z370 (yet another dead end Intel architecture)
Could you specify the number of threads used by each games in your benchs ? Of course if you put a 8 core mulithreading beast in front of a 4 core clock speed beast, the second will always be seen as better "for gaming" in (old) titles limited to 4 thread like GTA V, while the results for games with more threads like Watch Dogs 2 will be much more different.
Mostly when knowing that recent titles are using more and more threads than old gen AAA games, you could argue that the said CPU is more future proof for gaming than the other.
I use a piece of software called Magix movie edit Pro 2018 and a 1080p 60fps video takes 1.5 hours to render :/ I have the Ryzen 2700x, Strix Gtx 1060 6gb & 16GB ram at 300mhz. Any ideas on what to do?
How long is the video? Wich codec?
And yet still not enough horses under the hood to dethrone the Ryzen killer 8700k @5.1Ghz...Good effort though but sadly no cigar.
Guess I'm gunna be waiting on Zen 3 2020...sometime!!.
as i want to upgrade from my old wolfdale core2duo cpu, if its ryzen, im going for 2600 or 2600x for the budget, if intel, may i5 8400, as long i can partner on either buying a gtx 1070 or the new gtx 1170 if it arrives..... im gonna use it mainly on gaming then some little or future productivity just in case (kinda like a bit of jack of all trades on a budget)
TSMC not Global Foundries. Global Foundries was 1st gen Ryzen 14nm. The 2700x boost isn't 4.25 but 4.35ghz. Some wrong information over the masses goes a long way.
16:42 *if you are willing to pay about 150-200$ more (with a tower cooler or AIO that can handle 5GHz)
If I go for this cpu rather then i7 8700k....im going to save $165 which I can finally place a 256gb ssd in my budget ...and buy cat7 lan cable and hdmi 2.0 cable and a gaming keyboard......sounds better deal to me then getting the i7
same as the fx second gen , just 10% faster, also has the same cooler with a different fan still not worth the upgrade from x99 , and 5820 .better spend on hard drive since ram price are still up from video/photo editor pov
Great test!. Incuding After Effects, Warp Stabilizer..... Thank You for it! It is espacially important for people who don't care if You get 120/140 fps in games - but the difference in work speed is quite important.
What does the usb port do on the fan?
I read it's for controlling/syncing the RGB lights.
This feature shall only be available for 'preinstalled' fans. The others shall be controlled by the mainboard somehow instead. But if you have one of these USB-programmable ones there is a program by Cooler Master in which you can set your preferred settings.
Thanks to this USB-RGB standard you may sync even through some different manufacturers (if compatible) and therefore save yourself from getting *insane*.
I think you can sometimes even change the light depending on it's measured temperature on some devices who do support USB-RGB.
Thanks for this review. Please could you say if R7 2700X bios posting is faster than previous gen ? On my current R7 1700X (crosshair hero VI) setup, ram compatibility has been improved, however bios posting is rather long (due to RAM training) vs my intel setup. Thanks in advance.
does it light up even without the rgb header plug in it just the 4 pin
Your video quality is always great, you have the quality of someone with millions of subscribers.
Is well view how AMD has improved his products, I´m still not doing an upgrade, I have the i7 4790 non K. I should wait for at least 2 or 3 more years.
Beautiful intro, earned my sub
If game software is optimized for AMD then AMD will be the best. There has been way too much optimization for Intel and that's what shows up in these numbers.
Convince me............, i7 or a 2700x for gaming, game development, music production, and sketchup
I have 16gb ram, I was lucky enough to buy it when ram was cheap, it kind of surprises me that reviewers are still using the same amount of ram that I installed years ago for just a run of the mill system.
I am stuck trying to decide between an r7 2700 for 390 bucks or an r7 2700X 40 470 bucks.... what is the better value?!?
Very well made review. Keep it up!
Very helpful review. Detailed info and tight editing. I'm waiting on the 3rd Gen Ryzen 3000 series now 👍
anyone feel he look like KennyS csgo player? ? lol
The 105W TDP for the 2700X is weird. It both runs cooler and uses less power than the 1700X. See gamers nexus video for an explanation of how AMD calculates its TDP.
You look like one of the players in PUBG. Great video by the way. I love my 2700x, and i just took the overclock of 4.2ghz off. i dont think it needs it.
since XFR2.0 is the thing now, I would type in specification of CPU "up to 4.35Ghz" without base freq.
I would think that this should less than half it's current price 6 months after the Ryzen 3600X is released.