NCAER : World Economic Outlook & India : What Lies Ahead

National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER) is organising a discussion on May 8, 2024 on the IMF’s latest World Economic Outlook and its implications for India.
IMF economists Dr Mehdi Benatiya Andaloussi and Dr Nicolas Fernandez-Arias will present the IMF’s global outlook, followed by a discussion by a panel comprising Dr Poonam Gupta, Director General of NCAER and Member of the Economic Advisory Council to the PM; Dr V. Anantha Nageswaran, Chief Economic Adviser to the Government of India; and Dr Auguste Tano Kouamé, World Bank’s Country Director for India. Ms Lena Schipper, South Asia Bureau Chief for The Economist, will chair the panel and moderate the Q&A session.

[@navinbhalani5505]

From metro cities to smallest villages 90% house are 100 and above years old this one sentence is enough for our economy.

[@Vikasit952]

Real miracle starts when India grows @ of 15 % pa on a sustained basis for the next two decades for a real breakthrough for the country . Jai Hind !

[@lord_of_love_and_thunder]

We really need a deep dive into private investment in India. Every conceivable factor affecting gfcf has improved significantly in the last 10 years, quality of power supply, transport infrastructure and ease of doing business. And the CEA informs us that firms are sitting on a heap of savings. One hypothesis is this that large Indian firms would rather invest to service more profit per unit effort demand in the West, just like our brightest minds prefer solving the problems of the West.

[@mitulzaveri1981]

Why does the graphs specifically show UK and Canada... Which are smaller economies when compared to India and Germany.... IMF should replace as per growing changes...

[@MichaelShenton-wr6oq]

May SO Many: -Investors;
"Invest into: India".
I hope; they do!!!!

[@sushantnarang7552]

When saving is declining,it shows growth is coming down .

[@srinivasraokaruturi9777]

i think it shows the opposite..shows optimism and growth and hence consumption..hence reduced saving...in the confidence of future savings/investment etc...

[@sandeepssangha]

@sushantnarang7552 Again you didnt listen what was said twice or have excellent amnesia, it was not said saving is declining, what was shared was the flow of saving (nature of it), where it was shared the its been diversified to real assets like houses etc at faster pace. So saving didnt go away, it was the shape of it which changed, with higher expected growth in real estate to better returns. Also when more money goes to real assets like housing, it further leads to economic boom, due to the nature of all materials required including labour. If you want to conclude 2+2=5 despite all whats said and known otherwise to be 4. Then religiously motivated or politically motivated flat earthers cant be help logically, where they conclude first and avoid listening to data sets due to need to conclude a particular way and outcome

[@sushantnarang7552]

@@sandeepssangha Shut up u Andhbhakt .

[@sushantnarang7552]

@@sandeepssangha Hahahshaha

[@GanacsadeCabdi-sf4cx]

Well.actually really economic is good but you have to fight the corruption because is enemy of the human life is not a good so olso should try to enhance in education because education is dying to see what happens when you are my friends are coming to college tomorrow that is why we focus on your work for every day really you have done something is good but try increase the economic growth that is beautiful so ilove younger brother and sister and u should try to think about it so we have to speak in our future so don't afraid of anyone else in my opinion so have mid night dear friend

[@srinivasanranganathan7159]

While we admire China for maintaining 9 to 10% growth for 20 years, we always seem to take refuge under changed economic scenarios when it comes to India. Not that China had a favourable scenario as compared to India during the 20 odd years that they progressed. It is the keen focus, the unwavering determination and the intelligent effort to keep the economic growth rather than complacency, explanations and excuses that go to describe or justify the lack of progress in democracies vis-a-vis communist China. Despite the emphasis on freedom and liberty, democracies the world over had fallen for the economic advantages that trading with communist China offered. The so called suppression of human rights, freedom of expression and liberty that democracies, like the US, profess to champion are all forgotten when economic advantage is offered. It looks more like money before morals and benefit before conscience.

[@roshanchapagain5335]

There is negative growth y play on data

[@roshanchapagain5335]

False data