I'm also using an Elite Suito trainer and consider buying these pedals. Other than for sprinting, did you notice any discepancy concerning the power readings? I'm thinking my trainer underreads a little: I bought the suito in february 2020 and have read here and there that the early units might have this problem.
@@TacomaCyclist Yeah, I calibrate it every month or so but have to use the elite app to do so. Impossible to do it using zwift which boggles my mind...
Thanks for your great review, great that you bring your son into cycling! One question. I am considering to buy the Assioma or the new Garmin Rally pedals. Biggest pro for the Garmin is, that I can keep my Shimano cleats / the shimano styl clipping. I never used Look Kéo and I am not sure, if it will be difficult to learn another clipping style. Looks easy as you clip in, can you comment on that?
Why would transmission losses (percentage wise) only occur during sprint efforts? It seems that the trainer should always read a tad less than the pedals.
It's not that they're only during sprints. Notice, I mentioned that They'll ready 810 to 815 when the trainer or Quarq are reading 800? That's still 1 to 2% but because it's a bigger base number, the discrepancy seems bigger. In reality, it's still within that range but appears more significant at higher wattages.
dude it's great to see you back!!! I need to catch up on your vlogs.
Was considering getting these pedals for my winter bike, and tt bike 😀👍 thanks for review dude👌
Glad I could help!
Thanks for the review! 1 questions: How is the accuracy at low power (below 50W), and at what low level do they "drop out"?
Pretty darn accurate.
They don't drop out. Theoretically you could produce as low as 1 watt of power and it would detect and transmit that reading.
I'm also using an Elite Suito trainer and consider buying these pedals. Other than for sprinting, did you notice any discepancy concerning the power readings? I'm thinking my trainer underreads a little: I bought the suito in february 2020 and have read here and there that the early units might have this problem.
None. The trainer I have is dead on accurate. Have you done a recent calibration on the trainer?
@@TacomaCyclist Yeah, I calibrate it every month or so but have to use the elite app to do so. Impossible to do it using zwift which boggles my mind...
Thanks for your great review, great that you bring your son into cycling!
One question. I am considering to buy the Assioma or the new Garmin Rally pedals.
Biggest pro for the Garmin is, that I can keep my Shimano cleats / the shimano styl clipping.
I never used Look Kéo and I am not sure, if it will be difficult to learn another clipping style.
Looks easy as you clip in, can you comment on that?
Honestly, they're pretty identical. They are only slightly different and many people wouldn't even be able to tell the difference.
@@TacomaCyclist Thanks!
Why would transmission losses (percentage wise) only occur during sprint efforts? It seems that the trainer should always read a tad less than the pedals.
It's not that they're only during sprints. Notice, I mentioned that They'll ready 810 to 815 when the trainer or Quarq are reading 800? That's still 1 to 2% but because it's a bigger base number, the discrepancy seems bigger. In reality, it's still within that range but appears more significant at higher wattages.
@@TacomaCyclist Thanks. 1-2% difference in readings looks reasonable to me.
There’s a rumor that Favero will be using Shimano SPD pedals on their next powermeter pedals. That’s exciting!
That would be exciting! Spd cleats, imo, are the best and most flexible.
I notice no difference whatsoever between the assiomas and the spd-sl I used before
I don’t know anybody who has a bad word to say about these pedals .