as someone who is plural, it's actually wonderful to listen to this video. you handled it incredibly respectfully, and it's fascinating to hear this interpretation of something i have had brainrot about ever since. 💙
I also think the Paul DID / OSDD interpretation is so underrated too bc not only does it almost perfectly explain the discrepancies between Paul and Care, but also perfectly fits in with the themes of child abuse as DID and OSDD develop often from severe child abuse at a very young age.
It's been a while since I kept up with anything related to Petscop, with me having only watched the ending recently, years after it already concluded. Thankfully, a recap wasn't necessary for me to understand the video and enjoy it. Of all the videos I've seen analysing the series, this one might actually be my favorite.
A wonderful analysis that certainly more views than what it currently has. I do think there may be more of a connection between Candace Newmaker's story and Petscop's overarching plot line. The more you look into attachment "therapy", the more apparent it becomes that its practitioners and adherents do not see children as autonomous human beings deserving of rights and respect, but rather objects whose love and obedience caregivers are inherently entitled to. Given the themes regarding identity, particularly the robbing and confusion regarding identity, I think there is a more salient connection between the two than most people realize. However, I can also acknowledge and respect the creator's desire to distance the work from the horrific real life case. I personally don't see anything wrong with referencing a concept such as attachment "therapy", but I agree that it including a specific case which resulted in the death of a child was quite disrespectful.
That description of the door riddle was the clearest thing I’ve seen on the topic. I actually get it now.
as someone who is plural, it's actually wonderful to listen to this video. you handled it incredibly respectfully, and it's fascinating to hear this interpretation of something i have had brainrot about ever since. 💙
glad to know i covered it well!
“Here
I
Come” love that part
No idea how this video was recommended to me, but I'm glad it was! Great job, and keep it up!
HAY, somebody who actually remembered that it was the PSX, thank you.
really great analysis, petscop just continues to stay relevant with its story and themes:)
Great video!! Honestly I'm glad it wasn't just a recap, I loved hearing your perspective
peak petscop interpretation
omg I missed petscop videos this was so perfect, loved it sm
AUGHGGGG THIS IS THE PETSCOP VIDEO IVE BEEN WAITING FOR !!! I'VE BEEN A PAUL DID / OSDD BELIEVER !!!
I also think the Paul DID / OSDD interpretation is so underrated too bc not only does it almost perfectly explain the discrepancies between Paul and Care, but also perfectly fits in with the themes of child abuse as DID and OSDD develop often from severe child abuse at a very young age.
I’m really interested in the different branches of theories caused by this one particular series, well done!!
It's been a while since I kept up with anything related to Petscop, with me having only watched the ending recently, years after it already concluded. Thankfully, a recap wasn't necessary for me to understand the video and enjoy it. Of all the videos I've seen analysing the series, this one might actually be my favorite.
Petscop content in 2024, let's go
I won’t know how this video plays out. But I can already feel myself falling asleep. 10/10
A wonderful analysis that certainly more views than what it currently has.
I do think there may be more of a connection between Candace Newmaker's story and Petscop's overarching plot line. The more you look into attachment "therapy", the more apparent it becomes that its practitioners and adherents do not see children as autonomous human beings deserving of rights and respect, but rather objects whose love and obedience caregivers are inherently entitled to. Given the themes regarding identity, particularly the robbing and confusion regarding identity, I think there is a more salient connection between the two than most people realize. However, I can also acknowledge and respect the creator's desire to distance the work from the horrific real life case. I personally don't see anything wrong with referencing a concept such as attachment "therapy", but I agree that it including a specific case which resulted in the death of a child was quite disrespectful.
This is such a well put together video, I’m surprised at the lack of views
Tony said in an interview that they enjoy ambiguity and like when it's left to stand on it's own. I think that's always been the missing puzzle piece.
Commenting for the algorithm