And the 747 and 380 are no exceptions. I don't remember now, but the 707 was the first aircraft with a turbine engine with 4 on it. So sad it disappear
@@sergiolaurencio7534 The de Havilland Comet was not only the first jet liner but also sported four jet engines...the 707 was the better and safer US answer to it.
The record of A319 is even more amazing. Been flying for 25 years, has 3 times the amount of A340s built (1500 built), and flies much more flights, some of them into the world’s most dangerous airports, and has never had a fatality. Great looking, too!
ΓΕΩΡΓΙΟΣ QF32 at Signapore in Oct 2010 was about as close as anybody would like to get though. After the engine blew it was a great crew, fantastic Airmanship, luck , & an great aeroplane that stopped it being a total catastrophe.
ΓΕΩΡΓΙΟΣ the 747 has been in service for 50 years, over 1,550 build and flown. The A380 has been in service for 13 years with 242 built. Give it time, statistically there will be an A380 crash if they are in service long enough. I doubt they will, with cargo versions uneconomically feasible you will see many retire quickly over the next 15 years. Look at the Boeing 777, operated for 25 years before a hull loss. The only fatalities on the 777 that were not due to aircraft issues (MH17 shot down, MH 370 unknown, but more than likely not an aircraft issue but nefarious intervention) are the victims from the Asiana 214 flight that landed short at SFO, and that was a pilot issue. It could be argued that not a single fatality can be attributed to the Boeing 777 itself.
The A340 will always be one of my favs. The smoothest landing and flight I’ve ever experienced was on board an A340. I’ve flown on all of Boeing’s 700 series aircraft and the MD11 and the airbus still stands out.
Ok, So you have permission to fly Airbus. I haven't flown on any big plane yet, But I am planing. And the 787 would be my first one. I love both Boeing and Airbus. Just only with one thing
@@Luton-Mick The A380 is the most comfortable plane on the world. But not that most comfortable to nature. People don't understand how bad we are damaged the earth and time is running out
The A340 was a perfect plane to fly - smooth, safe thus giving passengers comfort and the safety reassurance of 4 engines. It’s a crying shame they were discontinued, replaced by twin engined noddy jets.
I remember flying in the A340. This was back in September 2004 when my dad and I were on our way to the Philippines for my brother's wedding. At the time Singapore Airlines was offering a non-stop flight from Newark Airport to Changi Airport using the A340. They only carried 120 passengers in a two class layout(Raffles (business class), and Executive Economy). The flight took 18 1/2 hrs. They flew with 2 complete flight crews that worked in 8hr shifts. Service on that flight was 2nd only to Lufthansa. At the time that was the longest flight. Seating in executive economy was a 2 - 3 - 2 configuration with a large galley space at the rear where they'd layout snacks and sandwiches available between meal service. Some day I'd like to fly that route again in the A350 - 900ULR.
I took that same flight a half dozen times. Sometimes we went straight over the North Pole. Other times we went straight east. Was definitely an interesting flight. No desire to do it again however. Too long to be in the air.
I can't really sleep on planes which is why I hate overnight flights and avoid them like the plague. The only time I slept on a plane was on Iberia from Barcelona to Chicago - on an A340. It was that smooth.
In 2018 I flew from Frankfurt to San Diego on a 340-300 with Lufthansa. Sad to hear that now this flight starts from Munich and is operated with a A350-900
No mention of the 5 specially modified (for extended range) A340-500’s that Singapore Airlines used on its SIN- EWR and SIN-LAX non stop routes. Regs were 9V-SGA thru to SGE. The former was typically an 18+ hour flight in both directions and the latter was around 14 hours outbound and 18+ hours inbound, with operating altitudes between 38,000 and 41,000 feet. I flew on both, (Premium economy.) Despite the horrific sound of 18 hours , they were actually very comfortable flights. The seats were very comfortable with good leg room, especially if you had a seat next to one of the emergency exit doors. Passengers were encouraged to get up and move around the cabin and use the “ Mini-Bar” for drinks and snacks. There was always a great selection of fruit and muffins there (self serve) and a friendly crew member to get you a drink....or give you a free lesson in Mandarin.
@@visionist7 Singapore Airlines recommenced flying that route with the A350 just before the Covid situation hit the planet. They did suspend it as a consequence, but I am sure it will be restarted in the near future. So your wish may become opportunity within a couple of years.
I took a similar flight several times, NYC (Newark, IIRC) to Bangkok. It’s a long flight - 16 hours or so - but you’re always moving. I prefer to go directly to Asia rather than stopover in Europe. Asian airports, in my opinion, are much much nicer. The Middle East is also a viable stopover spot, Qatar flies A350s and 777s out of JFK nowadays, and the Doha airport is impeccable. These long range flights have made international travel much more pleasant. I sometimes wondered by Airbus didn’t just reengineer the A340 to be a twin once the large GE90-style turbofans became available. I suppose that’s easier said than done.
@@ClockworksOfGL In fact, the original design for A350 was to be pretty much just that, with a new wing, but otherwise an A330/340 derived fuselage + GEnx engines. That however turned out to be incompetitive with the Dreamliner, so they went on to design the all-composite XWB that we all know and love
@@antonklymenko5569 - Oh yeah, I remember Airbus back then tried to nickel-and-dime “improvements” to their existing airframes and the airlines were totally unimpressed.
Anything that gives passengers the human feeling of comfort, has to go, and be replaced by something smaller and more uncomfortable. Sardine can class is now the new King of air travel.
Comfort has a price. The actual problem lies on living standards rather than cutting costs. People are educated to look alike instead of becoming richer (legally). If your life model is to go to school, get some graduation, find a job, save money then die, you are the problem : you're poor. Instead, you should find what you're good at, fight to make what you like to do profitable in a substantial way, then *spend* your money. Every good thing that comes to an end is due to people becoming poorer and poorer. Supersonic flights ? Vacations ? Do something costy because it's a chidhood dream ? You can, but only if early enough you realized you actually could, then took decisions in your life to support it, financially. There is no government plan that can help you be wealthier. Now you know, but let's take a moment, and suppose you've achieved that step, you''re rich now, you can afford 5 first class seats in a supersonic jet for your family for a New York-Singapore trip... you're the only one able to do so. There is no other custommer willing to pay 30000$. So, me as the airline, I won't buy that supersonic wonderful top notch comfort Airbus jet to please you. I'll buy that A350 high density plane *because* the other passengers are *poor* and can only afford the 1000$ round JFK-SIN trip. The problem is not me/the airline, it's not the rich, it's the *poor lambda people that are all lookalike and satisfied with their conditions.*
Regular flyer on the A343 however, I once flew the A350, B777 and return leg B777, A343 in less than 3 days. The A340-300 is by far the most comfortable aircraft in terms of flight dynamics and quiteness. B777 and to a much lesser extent the A350 has this constant humming from those massive engines which the A343 (4 × small CFM56 engines) doesnt suffer from. Add to that a very loud sound of the cabin airconditioning on the 777, I still feel that the A340-300 remains a gem in terms of long haul comfort
One thing to add: Aircraft certification relies heavily on its one engine out take off performance (1 engine failure during take off). A twin engine jet will in this case lose 50% of thrust while a quad engine aircraft will only lose 25%. That's the reason for the A340 having a much higher max takeiff weight compared to an a330 despite having the same fuselage and almost the same amount of lbs of thrust
I love A340. The best aircraft I've ever experienced. Beautiful. Comfortable to fly on. Perfect safety record! It's not a failure, it's a great success for what was needed at the time...Sadly nowadays Aviation is not about the best and most reliable, it's about the cheapest and most efficient! So A340 it's not there! Goodbye A340, you will probably remain my most loved Aircraft ever!
My first A340 flight was Copenhagen - Tokyo Narita with SAS, interior was showing age with resistive touchscreens but the outdoor cameras were a novel feature to me then, had a great return trip on the type
Out of many, many types of aircraft I’ve flown on since 1959, the A340 really was my favourite. When boarding and when you looked down the aisles, it always gave a good feeling and just felt comfortable. Carriers like Air Canada and Cathay Pacific used them extensively between North America and Asia and you were able rested
I once had a long haul flight with a LH A340-600 from Francfort to Seoul in business class. Until then this was my most comfortable flight ever, only topped by several flights in an A380 business class a couple of years later.
I've been lucky enough to fly the 340-300, 500 and, most recently just before the pandemic, the 600. From the inside there isn't much of a difference (aside from the downstairs bathrooms on Lufthansa) but the aircraft is so elegant and beautiful from the outside.
To be honest, as a passenger, I found the A340-300 to be sluggish, taking nervously what felt like forever to rotate then, the long slow climb to cruise altitude. Once at altitude, then eventual descent and landing everything was normal. I never got the chance to fly on the A340-200. It was a completely different experience with the A340-500 and A340-600, ( and also the A330-200 and A330-300 ) so much so, I could not help feeling the A340-300 was underpowered. I didn't realize, nor understood at the time, it was programmed that way to produce the most economical fuel burn. I was young and naive back then and the best part / the main fun about flying was to feel the g-force on take-off and the power of the reverse thrust upon landing lol. I certainly would classify the A340 as a failure, as you stated, back then with no ETOPS it was a different situation. The MD11 however was a different story in that when produced, it simply did not live up to the economics that it was marketed and sold to achieve. In addition, as KLM found out, it suffered from reliability issues and was not as easy to fly as the DC10. By luck, it appears to have faired better as a freighter than a passenger aircraft, but even there, it does not appear to have the same longevity as the DC10/MD10.
Having flown on this aircraft on numerous occasions I would say that for quietness and comfort it beats its American rivals hands down. Happy that Lufthansa still flies it.
The -500 variant gets my vote as the prettiest subsonic airliner, those nicely spaced four Trent 500s giving it a balanced look with unrivalled presence in the air and on the tarmac. As for comfort, older aircraft are usually better when it comes to personal space and the A340 is no exception with a typical 2-4-2 layout in economy meaning fewer middle seats compared to other long-haul jets.
Thank you for this video. Ironically, I heard a pilot say on UA-cam that the economy of the A340-300's smaller engines outways the expense of maintaining 4 engines
@@ProfessorFickle Tri-jets are like the crappy compromise between the two, they've got the added complexity of a third engine placed in an inconvenient location while having the fuel efficiency of a quadjet.
The A340-600 is still the sexiest commercial aircraft to fly. Its long slender fuselage and wide graceful wings culminating it a prideful flick of its wingtip evokes the grace of a skillful dancing ballerina
I enjoyed flying in the A340, and for me, the added comfort of 4 Engines as opposed to two used to put me at ease. The A340 has had a bulletproof safety record. I miss that about it.
Lovely to see that there are fans of Airbus in the comments. Although in my country, there never was an Airline who bought the A340 but I've always been a fan of Airbus having done numerous flights with A319/20/21, Boeing 737, ATR36/72, Bombardier Q400. Airbus has the best seats, best cabin insulation and smoothest landings.
Pendolino Fan Ohh! Cool. When I see it it is because it flies from Cape Town to Bergen (Norway). I have problems understanding how it can fly so far. All of this is according to Flightradar24.
Taking an A340-600 was one of the best flights I ever had, I loved how I had to go downstairs for the bathroom as it allowed me to stretch my legs, making me more relaxed.
My favourite plane. It’s so sad they discontinued it. A beautiful aircraft, one of the very few quad jet planes ever built. I can recall only 4, Airbus A380, A340, Boeing 747, Boeing Dreamliftrr
Personally I love the A340 series. Flew the -200, -300 and -600. SAA, TAP, Iberia, Air France and Swiss. I don’t think it was a failure at all of an aircraft. As explained in the video it was developed during the days when ETOPS 120 was the limit and ETOPS 180 was a dream to any airline and regulators. It was made to be an economical-restriction free airplane and it did just that. It gave good performance under FLEX takeoffs out of hot and high airports with a significant amount of weight. If you compare fuel flow per hour, the A340-600 burns slightly less than the 777-300ER. Only problem were maintenance fees, double the engines, systems etc. If you view it as a transitional jet which allowed airlines to open up new markets, and it had a an amazing economy layout 2-4-2, very spacious and comfortable then it was a successful aircraft.
I used to fly Athens to Melbourne with Olympic airways A340-313. Best looking aircraft I enjoyed looking at it and traveling every time. Still miss it. It was something special.
The A340 was developed at a time when ETOPS 180 certification was just a pipe dream. Once the Boeing 777 proved that twinjets could fly long overwater routes, Airbus suddenly got a rush of A330 orders, especially the A330-200 model that became available in the late 1990's.
I flew an A340 with Virgin Atlantic from Heathrow to Los Angeles when I was 9. From what I remember it was a surprisingly pleasant flight given the duration
One of the more beatiful airplane ever. The symetric lines, surround sound generated in your 4 fans when a take off is amazin. Greetings from SGBR neighbor.
not the products fault whatsoever, the aircraft was a quad jet beauty combined with its safety its a godfather to many of the newer aircrafts produced nowadays!
5:19 PAL A340 Now retired, pity that i can't see it anymore nor fly with this beauty, last time i saw this flyby on our area taking off, magnificent quad engine sounds and long fuselage flying overhead.
One important detail not often mentioned about the -200 and -300 series aircrafts is that they were underpowered, making them difficult to operate in high altitudes and on shorter runways. Some Air France pilots had to hire attorneys to force the airline to stop using them on the Bogota-Paris line.
I recall first flying on an A340 with Aerolineas Argentinas back in 2011 and 2012 when I flew from Sydney to Buenos Aires and back. I was awestruck by the long silhouette of the plane and loved the quad engine design. It became my second most favourite airplane, after the Queen of the Skies of course.
These sound like highly successful well used aircraft. Iberian Airlines most likely used these for their Spain to South American routes where they make the most sense.
The A340 is my favorite , I remember flying with it as a child , and slowly as I started growing up , I always had a love for aviation so I knew exactly what it can do , It always made the best landings , the plane looks incredible , it is spacy and adorable , I love the Pen ... Also how dare somebody call the safest aircraft in history a failure !
I did fly with lufthansa 340/600 . What a beautiful aircraft, in end outside! With the lavatories in the lower section of the aircraft makes it very unique!!!!!!!! Nice memories!!!!!!!! Can’t wait to fly the 777x .
I miss the security of 4 engines despite ETOPS. The 340 was an impressive aircraft. I enjoyed a comfortable non stop journey from London to Mauritius in 2017 with Air Mauritius and am glad to have had the experience.
Flown the A340 twice, from JNB to LHR on an SAA A346, and from ZRH to JNB on a Swiss A343. I remember both being extremely comfortable, with almost unnoticeable landings. Whether this was the plane, the crew or other factors I don't know, but it's a huge shame for me that I'll likely not fly the A340 again.
Here’s how I see it: The MD-11 is highly regarded as being ill-timed (i.e., ETOPS would become omnipresent just right after the MD-11’s inaugural flight) while the A330-300 is still heavily regarded as efficient, albeit with a lower range. Airbus was smart to develop its A350s to pretty much replace the A340s in airline’s fleets; specifically, the A350-900 has a greater range than the MD-11 and is much more efficient than the A330-300, so even the A350 is a legit replacement for any A330s in an airline’s fleet, which I mention because many airlines did replace their MD-11s with A330-300s (e.g., Finnair, China Airlines). On a side note, the A350F is as equally a legit replacement for MD-11Fs in cargo fleets (e.g., FedEx, Lufthansa Cargo).
It was never a fail. It still holds the best safety record of any airplane. It’s time passed like the 747. The rise of twin engine XWB airplanes took place of the quad engine planes. It had nothing to do with the plane being bad or failure, but rather fuel efficiency demands.
A340 One of the best airliner in the world. And I love the A340-600 more, it has spectacular view when take off and landing. Thank you Simple Flying keeping us informed
Flight attendants at the front of the A340-600 used to wave goodbye to the rearmost crew on takeoff as the fuselage would bend so much you couldn't see the rear of the aircraft under load.
There we go this channel has longer videos the type I like I recently commented that I was upset about the constantly seemingly repeating cycle of videos but the long haul has me hooked
The Airbus a 340 is probably the only aircraft that I have flown all the variants on. I have flown the A340-200, -300, -500 and -600 on Emirates, Cathy Pacific, Virgin Atlantic, Airblue, Air Lanka and Turkish Airlines.
The A340-600 is one of the sexiest looking aircraft ever, 4 engine aircrafts are just beautiful
And the 747 and 380 are no exceptions. I don't remember now, but the 707 was the first aircraft with a turbine engine with 4 on it. So sad it disappear
@@sergiolaurencio7534 The de Havilland Comet was not only the first jet liner but also sported four jet engines...the 707 was the better and safer US answer to it.
@@Luton-Mick So sad the 707 life was too short
The 777-200ER had hull losses. The 777-300ER did not crash at all
Ah yes the pencil
29 years, 10s of millions of flights, not a single fatal accident. An incredible safety record.
Airbus is being Airbus💪
The record of A319 is even more amazing. Been flying for 25 years, has 3 times the amount of A340s built (1500 built), and flies much more flights, some of them into the world’s most dangerous airports, and has never had a fatality. Great looking, too!
The A380 also has zero fatalities in accidents... Unlike the B747 and its 4000 plus fatalities.
ΓΕΩΡΓΙΟΣ QF32 at Signapore in Oct 2010 was about as close as anybody would like to get though. After the engine blew it was a great crew, fantastic Airmanship, luck , & an great aeroplane that stopped it being a total catastrophe.
ΓΕΩΡΓΙΟΣ the 747 has been in service for 50 years, over 1,550 build and flown. The A380 has been in service for 13 years with 242 built. Give it time, statistically there will be an A380 crash if they are in service long enough. I doubt they will, with cargo versions uneconomically feasible you will see many retire quickly over the next 15 years. Look at the Boeing 777, operated for 25 years before a hull loss. The only fatalities on the 777 that were not due to aircraft issues (MH17 shot down, MH 370 unknown, but more than likely not an aircraft issue but nefarious intervention) are the victims from the Asiana 214 flight that landed short at SFO, and that was a pilot issue. It could be argued that not a single fatality can be attributed to the Boeing 777 itself.
The A340 will always be one of my favs. The smoothest landing and flight I’ve ever experienced was on board an A340. I’ve flown on all of Boeing’s 700 series aircraft and the MD11 and the airbus still stands out.
how about an L1011 or BAC 111? I flown them, also...707, 737, 747, dc-9, dc-10 , several small Cessna, Trislander, and a B-17G. Never an airbus.
Ok, So you have permission to fly Airbus. I haven't flown on any big plane yet, But I am planing. And the 787 would be my first one. I love both Boeing and Airbus. Just only with one thing
Try the A380 if you want refinement, I flew to Bangkok with Thai on one and returned on a 777-300er, made the Boeing feel like a crop duster.
@@Luton-Mick The A380 is the most comfortable plane on the world. But not that most comfortable to nature. People don't understand how bad we are damaged the earth and time is running out
That why No came with the 787
Simpleflying teaches me the following subjects
-English
-History
-Geography
-Physics, sciences
-General Knowledge
That's a school I'd love to attend
Well said Ali Khurrum
I agree to you
True
Nd future also 😂😂
Sameee
I flew once in an Iberia A340-600 from New York to Madrid and has been one of the best long haul flights I have ever had
Sadly Iberia is retiring the a340-600 and LUFTHANSA is doing so 😥😭😫
@@Lee247Jamaica 🙃😒🧐😬🧐😣🙂😜😙😣😉😣🙄😧😩😕😞😳😵😓😵😦😵😖😫😓🤕😨😳😲🤨😝😚😝😚😒😣😟🤫😕🤫🤨🙃😔😜🙃- You
Wow. A340-600 longest flight is JFK-HKG in 2004-2007. Did that on December 17th 2005.
Dam you flew on the flying pencial
@@breadboi1248 I actually flew on the flying pencil too its longest flight 16 hours 20 minutes New York to Hong Kong December 17th 2005
I always find the dash 600 version looks photoshopped because it is so long
I'm sure they used a more expensive computer (aided design) program to copy+paste in the additional meters.
Seems I'm not the only one who thinks so
Have u seen the 757 300 or 777x and 777 300/ER
@@Lee247Jamaica the 777x doesn't seem that long because its wide
@@Lee247Jamaica 757-300 aka the flying pencil.
The A340 was a perfect plane to fly - smooth, safe thus giving passengers comfort and the safety reassurance of 4 engines. It’s a crying shame they were discontinued, replaced by twin engined noddy jets.
Not a machine is safe, and error could happen at any moment. And the 340 have some accidents.
The man could not do anything perfectly. But yes, the 340 is good
The A350 is much more efficient, is selling like hot cakes, has no exact rivals and so far has had no accidents.
@TigerG It's a bit bigger than the 787, but I guess for some routes the overlap of size would work
@TigerG and the 777 depending on the route. A350 is right between both.
I remember flying in the A340. This was back in September 2004 when my dad and I were on our way to the Philippines for my brother's wedding. At the time Singapore Airlines was offering a non-stop flight from Newark Airport to Changi Airport using the A340. They only carried 120 passengers in a two class layout(Raffles (business class), and Executive Economy). The flight took 18 1/2 hrs. They flew with 2 complete flight crews that worked in 8hr shifts. Service on that flight was 2nd only to Lufthansa. At the time that was the longest flight.
Seating in executive economy was a 2 - 3 - 2 configuration with a large galley space at the rear where they'd layout snacks and sandwiches available between meal service. Some day I'd like to fly that route again in the A350 - 900ULR.
Jesus! 18.5 hrs! That’d be a bit much for me.
18,5 hours... I thought you have a typo but then "Newark to Changi", darn.
@@grdprojekt now Singapore Airlines has revived the flight using the Airbus A350 XWB. Would love to see how the A350 stacks up to the A340.
@@rushfan3 that's right, of course, I almost completely forgot about the new SQ21/22
I took that same flight a half dozen times. Sometimes we went straight over the North Pole. Other times we went straight east. Was definitely an interesting flight. No desire to do it again however. Too long to be in the air.
In my humble opinion, the A340 was one of the most elegant and beautiful airliners ever built.
Yes indeed, It’s Sad that it is so underrated
Never got to fly on one. The most graceful airplane I have ever seen. I miss them terribly at LAX and SAN.
I can't really sleep on planes which is why I hate overnight flights and avoid them like the plague. The only time I slept on a plane was on Iberia from Barcelona to Chicago - on an A340. It was that smooth.
In 2018 I flew from Frankfurt to San Diego on a 340-300 with Lufthansa. Sad to hear that now this flight starts from Munich and is operated with a A350-900
My first flight ever was on a SAA A340-600 from Frankfurt to Johannesburg. The A346 became my favorite plane
That was my first flight in a wide body jet, that same route. A 747-200
No mention of the 5 specially modified (for extended range) A340-500’s that Singapore Airlines used on its SIN- EWR and SIN-LAX non stop routes. Regs were 9V-SGA thru to SGE.
The former was typically an 18+ hour flight in both directions and the latter was around 14 hours outbound and 18+ hours inbound, with operating altitudes between 38,000 and 41,000 feet. I flew on both, (Premium economy.) Despite the horrific sound of 18 hours , they were actually very comfortable flights. The seats were very comfortable with good leg room, especially if you had a seat next to one of the emergency exit doors.
Passengers were encouraged to get up and move around the cabin and use the “ Mini-Bar” for drinks and snacks. There was always a great selection of fruit and muffins there (self serve) and a friendly crew member to get you a drink....or give you a free lesson in Mandarin.
I wish I could have flown the EWR - SIN route. I guess I could still get the chance on the A350
@@visionist7 Singapore Airlines recommenced flying that route with the A350 just before the Covid situation hit the planet. They did suspend it as a consequence, but I am sure it will be restarted in the near future. So your wish may become opportunity within a couple of years.
I took a similar flight several times, NYC (Newark, IIRC) to Bangkok. It’s a long flight - 16 hours or so - but you’re always moving. I prefer to go directly to Asia rather than stopover in Europe. Asian airports, in my opinion, are much much nicer. The Middle East is also a viable stopover spot, Qatar flies A350s and 777s out of JFK nowadays, and the Doha airport is impeccable. These long range flights have made international travel much more pleasant. I sometimes wondered by Airbus didn’t just reengineer the A340 to be a twin once the large GE90-style turbofans became available. I suppose that’s easier said than done.
@@ClockworksOfGL In fact, the original design for A350 was to be pretty much just that, with a new wing, but otherwise an A330/340 derived fuselage + GEnx engines. That however turned out to be incompetitive with the Dreamliner, so they went on to design the all-composite XWB that we all know and love
@@antonklymenko5569 - Oh yeah, I remember Airbus back then tried to nickel-and-dime “improvements” to their existing airframes and the airlines were totally unimpressed.
Anything that gives passengers the human feeling of comfort, has to go, and be replaced by something smaller and more uncomfortable. Sardine can class is now the new King of air travel.
I know right
Comfort has a price. The actual problem lies on living standards rather than cutting costs. People are educated to look alike instead of becoming richer (legally). If your life model is to go to school, get some graduation, find a job, save money then die, you are the problem : you're poor. Instead, you should find what you're good at, fight to make what you like to do profitable in a substantial way, then *spend* your money.
Every good thing that comes to an end is due to people becoming poorer and poorer. Supersonic flights ? Vacations ? Do something costy because it's a chidhood dream ? You can, but only if early enough you realized you actually could, then took decisions in your life to support it, financially. There is no government plan that can help you be wealthier.
Now you know, but let's take a moment, and suppose you've achieved that step, you''re rich now, you can afford 5 first class seats in a supersonic jet for your family for a New York-Singapore trip... you're the only one able to do so. There is no other custommer willing to pay 30000$. So, me as the airline, I won't buy that supersonic wonderful top notch comfort Airbus jet to please you. I'll buy that A350 high density plane *because* the other passengers are *poor* and can only afford the 1000$ round JFK-SIN trip. The problem is not me/the airline, it's not the rich, it's the *poor lambda people that are all lookalike and satisfied with their conditions.*
It’s all because no-one (except a few) wants to pay more than necessary. Hence, everything costing more than needed has to go…
Regular flyer on the A343 however, I once flew the A350, B777 and return leg B777, A343 in less than 3 days. The A340-300 is by far the most comfortable aircraft in terms of flight dynamics and quiteness. B777 and to a much lesser extent the A350 has this constant humming from those massive engines which the A343 (4 × small CFM56 engines) doesnt suffer from. Add to that a very loud sound of the cabin airconditioning on the 777, I still feel that the A340-300 remains a gem in terms of long haul comfort
It’s probably the most unique airplane ever
It reminds me of the 707 for some
Reason
The 340 was and Ideas that airbus copy from the 707. We don't surprise me, also MD did it to. So the 707 was the first one to find the tresure.
@@sergiolaurencio7534 Wasnt the a340 made to compete with the B 767?
@@petrumsk3753 the real competitor for a340 is b777
One thing to add: Aircraft certification relies heavily on its one engine out take off performance (1 engine failure during take off). A twin engine jet will in this case lose 50% of thrust while a quad engine aircraft will only lose 25%. That's the reason for the A340 having a much higher max takeiff weight compared to an a330 despite having the same fuselage and almost the same amount of lbs of thrust
Even much than B777-300er
Still my favourite aircraft to spot. So interesting to look at and it is absolutely beautiful.
I love A340. The best aircraft I've ever experienced. Beautiful. Comfortable to fly on. Perfect safety record! It's not a failure, it's a great success for what was needed at the time...Sadly nowadays Aviation is not about the best and most reliable, it's about the cheapest and most efficient! So A340 it's not there! Goodbye A340, you will probably remain my most loved Aircraft ever!
My first A340 flight was Copenhagen - Tokyo Narita with SAS, interior was showing age with resistive touchscreens but the outdoor cameras were a novel feature to me then, had a great return trip on the type
I flew aboard Philippine Airlines Airbus A340-300 from Manila to Singapore. Best plane so far. Loved the experience.
Sorry Raymond but the PR A340-300s were a heap of crap. Flew in one from Sydney to Manila once - never again!
I did a flight from paris to cape town on a Air France 340-300 amazing aircraft . Sadly missed by many .
A340-600 was, by far, one of, if not THE quietest jet I’ve ever traveled on.
Data Masked Try the A380 - as long as it’s still around.
@@theypeedonmyrug Been on one also.
No wonder, if you sit in the first rows you are literelly 420 Meters away from the Engines :D
I’ve heard that the BAe-146 was very quiet too. I wish to see it some day.
@@theypeedonmyrug The A350 is just as quiet as the A380. It will be around for many years.
Out of many, many types of aircraft I’ve flown on since 1959, the A340 really was my favourite. When boarding and when you looked down the aisles, it always gave a good feeling and just felt comfortable. Carriers like Air Canada and Cathay Pacific used them extensively between North America and Asia and you were able rested
Beautiful aircraft, flew Madrid - London (Iberia) in business class, quiet, well looked after by cabin crew, felt like a king !
I once had a long haul flight with a LH A340-600 from Francfort to Seoul in business class. Until then this was my most comfortable flight ever, only topped by several flights in an A380 business class a couple of years later.
Small in size but 4 engine , This is what is required 😍🚀
I've been lucky enough to fly the 340-300, 500 and, most recently just before the pandemic, the 600. From the inside there isn't much of a difference (aside from the downstairs bathrooms on Lufthansa) but the aircraft is so elegant and beautiful from the outside.
I love the A340! I've crossed the atlantic 15+ times in one.
Love the A340. Flew on Lufthansa's Frankfurt-Baku route several times. Always smooth.
Smoothest flight, safest aircraft, and by far one of the most aesthetically pleasing. The A340 is a masterpiece and deserves more time in the skies.
To be honest, as a passenger, I found the A340-300 to be sluggish, taking nervously what felt like forever to rotate then, the long slow climb to cruise altitude. Once at altitude, then eventual descent and landing everything was normal. I never got the chance to fly on the A340-200. It was a completely different experience with the A340-500 and A340-600, ( and also the A330-200 and A330-300 ) so much so, I could not help feeling the A340-300 was underpowered. I didn't realize, nor understood at the time, it was programmed that way to produce the most economical fuel burn. I was young and naive back then and the best part / the main fun about flying was to feel the g-force on take-off and the power of the reverse thrust upon landing lol. I certainly would classify the A340 as a failure, as you stated, back then with no ETOPS it was a different situation. The MD11 however was a different story in that when produced, it simply did not live up to the economics that it was marketed and sold to achieve. In addition, as KLM found out, it suffered from reliability issues and was not as easy to fly as the DC10. By luck, it appears to have faired better as a freighter than a passenger aircraft, but even there, it does not appear to have the same longevity as the DC10/MD10.
I flew in the A340 in the early 2006 and I loved it. 🇨🇦
Having flown on this aircraft on numerous occasions I would say that for quietness and comfort it beats its American rivals hands down. Happy that Lufthansa still flies it.
The -500 variant gets my vote as the prettiest subsonic airliner, those nicely spaced four Trent 500s giving it a balanced look with unrivalled presence in the air and on the tarmac. As for comfort, older aircraft are usually better when it comes to personal space and the A340 is no exception with a typical 2-4-2 layout in economy meaning fewer middle seats compared to other long-haul jets.
One of my favorite jets, just a great looking quadie.
Thank you for this video. Ironically, I heard a pilot say on UA-cam that the economy of the A340-300's smaller engines outways the expense of maintaining 4 engines
Airbus: A 340: 4 engines 4 Longhaul
Boeing 777: 2 Engines 2 make money
TRI-Jets ?
Correct.
bd5av8r1 so understandable
@@ProfessorFickle Tri-jets are like the crappy compromise between the two, they've got the added complexity of a third engine placed in an inconvenient location while having the fuel efficiency of a quadjet.
@@Fishfingers232 : Disagree about the efficiency .
The A340-600 is still the sexiest commercial aircraft to fly. Its long slender fuselage and wide graceful wings culminating it a prideful flick of its wingtip evokes the grace of a skillful dancing ballerina
I enjoyed flying in the A340, and for me, the added comfort of 4 Engines as opposed to two used to put me at ease. The A340 has had a bulletproof safety record. I miss that about it.
Lovely to see that there are fans of Airbus in the comments. Although in my country, there never was an Airline who bought the A340 but I've always been a fan of Airbus having done numerous flights with A319/20/21, Boeing 737, ATR36/72, Bombardier Q400. Airbus has the best seats, best cabin insulation and smoothest landings.
"the long boi"
Or also "The flying pencil"
@@trazkey No, I’m afraid that would be the 757-300.
OK, I'm hooked - new subscriber. I especially like the clarity of your voice, and the depth of the content... excellent!
A340 is/was a magnificent beast. No other plane ever roared like that one.
Sometimes there flies an air Belgium a340 over my house.
Some times i see a340 I'm in Manchester
Pendolino Fan Ohh! Cool. When I see it it is because it flies from Cape Town to Bergen (Norway). I have problems understanding how it can fly so far. All of this is according to Flightradar24.
Love the A340 so smooth and quiet.
0:17 can we talk about that flare??? That's the best one I have EVER seen
The a340-600 looks weird being so long
We could say its a flying pencil, a beautiful one at that
The A340 is indeed a true beauty! However, the flying pencil is still the 757-300.
@@aviationlba747 very true
F. L. Y. I. N. G. P. E. N. C. I. L
I still think the A340-600 is the most elegantly beautiful airliner ever built. I love the way it looks...
Taking an A340-600 was one of the best flights I ever had, I loved how I had to go downstairs for the bathroom as it allowed me to stretch my legs, making me more relaxed.
After flying in almost all the commercial aircrafts of boeing and airbus, i have to say A340 and A380 are the best ever.
Ive been in love with the A340-600 since i was a kid and got fly on an South African Airways A340-600 🙂
My favourite plane. It’s so sad they discontinued it. A beautiful aircraft, one of the very few quad jet planes ever built. I can recall only 4, Airbus A380, A340, Boeing 747, Boeing Dreamliftrr
Personally I love the A340 series. Flew the -200, -300 and -600. SAA, TAP, Iberia, Air France and Swiss. I don’t think it was a failure at all of an aircraft. As explained in the video it was developed during the days when ETOPS 120 was the limit and ETOPS 180 was a dream to any airline and regulators. It was made to be an economical-restriction free airplane and it did just that. It gave good performance under FLEX takeoffs out of hot and high airports with a significant amount of weight. If you compare fuel flow per hour, the A340-600 burns slightly less than the 777-300ER. Only problem were maintenance fees, double the engines, systems etc. If you view it as a transitional jet which allowed airlines to open up new markets, and it had a an amazing economy layout 2-4-2, very spacious and comfortable then it was a successful aircraft.
Will always love the A340 no matter how many latest aircrafts enter the market
I used to fly Athens to Melbourne with Olympic airways A340-313. Best looking aircraft I enjoyed looking at it and traveling every time. Still miss it. It was something special.
The a340-500 is the best looking plane IMO
Agreed
The A340 was developed at a time when ETOPS 180 certification was just a pipe dream. Once the Boeing 777 proved that twinjets could fly long overwater routes, Airbus suddenly got a rush of A330 orders, especially the A330-200 model that became available in the late 1990's.
I flew an A340 with Virgin Atlantic from Heathrow to Los Angeles when I was 9. From what I remember it was a surprisingly pleasant flight given the duration
One of the more beatiful airplane ever. The symetric lines, surround sound generated in your 4 fans when a take off is amazin. Greetings from SGBR neighbor.
I watch this video everyday and cry
Probably the most comfortable long-haul jet ever, in my opinion.
Thank you very much for this very well researched and very informative video!
That bird is pretty!!!
not the products fault whatsoever, the aircraft was a quad jet beauty combined with its safety its a godfather to many of the newer aircrafts produced nowadays!
Underrated aircraft. I went on A340 300 and 600 both decent. Went on Turkish A340 300 and with Virgin A340 600
That 600 is a monster
I have never saw a340 at any airport but a340 family is my favourite family of aircraft.
This is the most beautiful built plane amongst all of them,ill definitely choose a quad jet over a twin anyday especially crossing vast oceans
Soon, you may not have that choice anymore…
5:19 PAL A340 Now retired, pity that i can't see it anymore nor fly with this beauty, last time i saw this flyby on our area taking off, magnificent quad engine sounds and long fuselage flying overhead.
The A340-600 will forever be the best looking aeroplane made. The proportions are so prefect!!! Wish i could fly it.😢
The Airbus A340 series should never been stored as they proof to be the best safety record airlines currently
One important detail not often mentioned about the -200 and -300 series aircrafts is that they were underpowered, making them difficult to operate in high altitudes and on shorter runways. Some Air France pilots had to hire attorneys to force the airline to stop using them on the Bogota-Paris line.
Which does not stand anymore for DLH aircraft due to alteration of the combustion chambers of their -5C.
And it was slower than almost every other airliner at cruising speed
I flew on every one of Virgin Atlantic's A340-300s and several of the -600s. Always a good flight, and super quiet.
What about South African Airways, Philippine Airlines, Qatar and Thai Airways?
o.k_aviation Flights and air Canada
There were many more 340 operators, Sri Lankan, Kuwait Airways, Thai, China, Vietnam
Indranil Chakrabarty yeah but you get the idea
Indranil Chakrabarty but Vietnam from what I seen, never own any a340 though
@@povsok3858 Vietnam leased a few 340s.
I recall first flying on an A340 with Aerolineas Argentinas back in 2011 and 2012 when I flew from Sydney to Buenos Aires and back. I was awestruck by the long silhouette of the plane and loved the quad engine design. It became my second most favourite airplane, after the Queen of the Skies of course.
Something majestic about 4 engines
I want to write my essay with it
I liked this plane. I flew with it several time, and i enjoyed every single flight. Fare Well buddy.
These sound like highly successful well used aircraft. Iberian Airlines most likely used these for their Spain to South American routes where they make the most sense.
The A340 is my favorite , I remember flying with it as a child , and slowly as I started growing up , I always had a love for aviation so I knew exactly what it can do , It always made the best landings , the plane looks incredible , it is spacy and adorable , I love the Pen ... Also how dare somebody call the safest aircraft in history a failure !
340 was the most beautiful commercial airliner ever built
i have flown with the a340 in the iranian fleet many times. I like the way they look and also they are very safe and very quiet in the cabin
I flew on Swiss Air from Johannesburg to Zurich and it was one of my best, and smooth rides of all times.
I did fly with lufthansa 340/600 . What a beautiful aircraft, in end outside! With the lavatories in the lower section of the aircraft makes it very unique!!!!!!!! Nice memories!!!!!!!! Can’t wait to fly the 777x .
I miss the security of 4 engines despite ETOPS. The 340 was an impressive aircraft. I enjoyed a comfortable non stop journey from London to Mauritius in 2017 with Air Mauritius and am glad to have had the experience.
Flown the A340 twice, from JNB to LHR on an SAA A346, and from ZRH to JNB on a Swiss A343. I remember both being extremely comfortable, with almost unnoticeable landings. Whether this was the plane, the crew or other factors I don't know, but it's a huge shame for me that I'll likely not fly the A340 again.
Here’s how I see it:
The MD-11 is highly regarded as being ill-timed (i.e., ETOPS would become omnipresent just right after the MD-11’s inaugural flight) while the A330-300 is still heavily regarded as efficient, albeit with a lower range. Airbus was smart to develop its A350s to pretty much replace the A340s in airline’s fleets; specifically, the A350-900 has a greater range than the MD-11 and is much more efficient than the A330-300, so even the A350 is a legit replacement for any A330s in an airline’s fleet, which I mention because many airlines did replace their MD-11s with A330-300s (e.g., Finnair, China Airlines).
On a side note, the A350F is as equally a legit replacement for MD-11Fs in cargo fleets (e.g., FedEx, Lufthansa Cargo).
It was never a fail. It still holds the best safety record of any airplane. It’s time passed like the 747. The rise of twin engine XWB airplanes took place of the quad engine planes. It had nothing to do with the plane being bad or failure, but rather fuel efficiency demands.
Don't know what, but the A340 has always seemed like the most attractive looking plane ever to me.
I loved this aircraft. I flew many times & I enjoyed it. Thanks Airbus.
A340-600 is IMHO is the best looking passenger airplane of all time.
A340 One of the best airliner in the world.
And I love the A340-600 more, it has spectacular view when take off and landing.
Thank you Simple Flying keeping us informed
I flew in a Lufthansa A340-600 from Caracas to Frankfurt and back, the plane was amazing with the lavatories downstairs, one of my favorites types
The A340-600 is one of my favorite planes.
Loved the two windows in the business class lavatories.
the a340-600 is in my opinion one of the most beautiful passenger aircraft ever built!
I Love this History on The A340 Plus I've seen them more than once during travelling.
Flight attendants at the front of the A340-600 used to wave goodbye to the rearmost crew on takeoff as the fuselage would bend so much you couldn't see the rear of the aircraft under load.
There we go this channel has longer videos the type I like I recently commented that I was upset about the constantly seemingly repeating cycle of videos but the long haul has me hooked
I used to fly Iberia Madrid to JFK, which was operated using a A340. Loved the plane, what a rocket ship!
My favorite plane to fly in. Love the the fact the toilets we a level down as a result you have room to stretch out and the toilets where bigger
The Airbus a 340 is probably the only aircraft that I have flown all the variants on. I have flown the A340-200, -300, -500 and -600 on Emirates, Cathy Pacific, Virgin Atlantic, Airblue, Air Lanka and Turkish Airlines.