What is a Line Integral ?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 жов 2024
  • Line Integral Definition and Example
    In this video, I calculate the line integral of a function, which calculates the area of the fence under a function and over a curve. I solve this by using parametrizations and the Pythagorean Theorem
    Subscribe to my channel: / drpeyam

КОМЕНТАРІ • 109

  • @nammashraqi4029
    @nammashraqi4029 4 роки тому +82

    Math would be a piece of cake if all of our math teachers were as happy as this man.

    • @Humayra_Kabir
      @Humayra_Kabir 4 роки тому

      Well said. 👏 👏 👏

    • @roc6596
      @roc6596 4 роки тому +3

      Math is easy for the most part. It just requires time and interest - which most people can't put in.

  • @ethannguyen2754
    @ethannguyen2754 4 роки тому +113

    Want to find
    That’s definitely what wtf means

    • @TranquilSeaOfMath
      @TranquilSeaOfMath 4 роки тому +1

      When I was in an undergrad class I learned wwts, meaning 'we want to show'. It was new to me at the time, but I have used it since with my own students. Looking at current abbreviations, I think it works better than what Dr. Peyam uses here which is distracting to students.

  • @plaustrarius
    @plaustrarius 4 роки тому +8

    I love how I'm not the only person that was completely thrown by 'wtf' hahaha! Absolutely love the dedication and quality content Dr. Peyam we do not deserve such an amazing prof. like you!!!

  • @GhostyOcean
    @GhostyOcean 4 роки тому +16

    My calc teacher gave a good intuition for line integrals. ds becomes ||T'||dt because it's the speed*time, so you get a tiny distance. The function is at a certain height, so distance*distance is area. Adding all the tiny distances together you get the integral.
    Same sort of things for vector line integrals, except it's
    F•ds = F•T'dt.

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 роки тому +4

      I like that!

  • @vartan_babayan_4388
    @vartan_babayan_4388 Рік тому

    the best explanation of line integral I've ever seen
    Thank you!!!

  • @pandabearguy1
    @pandabearguy1 4 роки тому +36

    Love the "wtf" lmao

  • @egillandersson1780
    @egillandersson1780 4 роки тому +2

    Perfectly clear ! Thank you for this bright explanation.

  • @Hari_Om12
    @Hari_Om12 3 роки тому

    Hey man just wanna appreciate your work, I have been watching your videos since I was in secondary school now I'm about to pass out of college and still proceed to watch your videos with same enthusiasm whenever it pops up in recommendation, just can't resist watching.

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  3 роки тому +1

      Thanks so much!!!

  • @mokopa
    @mokopa 3 роки тому +2

    Calculus *is* WTF!

  • @agustinmiranda3989
    @agustinmiranda3989 4 роки тому +1

    You did it again, you made it look so simple! Thanks!!

  • @BayekdeSiua
    @BayekdeSiua 4 роки тому +1

    You are amazing Peyam, greeatings from Manaus, Brazil ! ( você é o cara!)

  • @-C8
    @-C8 9 місяців тому

    Your video is great. I just back to watch it for the 3rd time, but with taking notes.

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  9 місяців тому

      Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @MrCigarro50
    @MrCigarro50 4 роки тому

    Precioso ejemplo, simple, claro...etc...etc. Muchas Gracias.

  • @Handelsbilanzdefizit
    @Handelsbilanzdefizit 4 роки тому +5

    Alternatively, you could also express y in terms of x. --> y(x) = sqrt(4-x²)
    Then you get a "normal" integral, that you could integrade with respect to x. --> Area = ∫ x²y(x) sqrt(1+y(x)'²) dx from 0..2
    ∫ _0^2 x²sqrt( (4-x²))sqrt(4/(4-x²) ) dx = 16/3
    But agreed, parametrization is more elegant. And more intuitively, if you associate 't' with timelike dimension. Greetings from Germany!

    • @tomatrix7525
      @tomatrix7525 4 роки тому

      Parameterisation wird auch wegen Gewohnheit gemacht. Wenn die Funktionen schwieriger werden, kann es nützlicher sein

  • @fabiandelgado6955
    @fabiandelgado6955 4 роки тому +1

    I am studying civil engineering in the best construction school in Mexico. Hope all the math courses teachers were as good as you bro. Please make a video explaining how do PDE work. Don't need them but I always want to learn more advanced calculus.

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 роки тому

      There’s already a playlist on that

  • @michaelroberts1120
    @michaelroberts1120 3 роки тому +1

    Great video Dr Peyam, but how do you go from this to Laurent series and Cauchy's residue theorem?

  • @coldandafraid
    @coldandafraid 2 роки тому

    The PI - M method; picture, inequality, math. By doctor Peyam.
    You are a genius.

  • @vietphamhung3290
    @vietphamhung3290 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks! Your video helps alot

  • @Keithfert490
    @Keithfert490 4 роки тому +2

    I think this is a bit different than the line integrals we normally do in physics. The work done, for example, by a force is the integral of F dot ds where F= and ds= (so, basically the vector equivalent of what was done here). The time when the equation you wrote would work is when the force is always in the direction of the curve itself.

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 роки тому +4

      Yeah, what you’re describing is the line integral of a vector field, here we’re talking about line integrals of functions. The two are related by integral F . dr is integral of F . r’(t)/|r’(t)| ds

  • @RafaJaco
    @RafaJaco 4 роки тому +1

    Excelente video Doc.

  • @alimghazzawi3700
    @alimghazzawi3700 4 роки тому

    I liked this video a lot because u simplified all of it to the point first year engineer student understood it.🤗

    • @giuliogerardini
      @giuliogerardini 2 роки тому

      LOL this is in my exam and I am first year engineer student

  • @jarikosonen4079
    @jarikosonen4079 4 роки тому

    There is possibly a lot of version for this line integral... Would integrating infinitely thin sheet density give any mass? Maybe that should have an example case...
    This seems to work very well with circular arc cases, where the square root term is canceling out and possibly quite well with straight line cases as y=x, y=c1 or x=c2...
    This looks quite a good example case. Taking f(x,y)=h would give test case to compare with cylinders surface area A=theta*sqrt(x0^2+y0^2)*h=theta*r*h...
    If h

  • @coreyplate1001
    @coreyplate1001 4 роки тому +1

    Idea for a fun (challenging?) youtube video -- solving the following integral: (0 --> +inf) sin(x*e^x)/(x*e^x)

  • @languafranter3450
    @languafranter3450 Рік тому

    It's very convenient to integrate a curve on the basis of it's parametric function. But what if a curve is unrepresentable by any explict parametric function of x and y, and only defines a relationship between them instead? (like ln(x+y)-sin(xy)+3=0 and given a range and a function f defined on XY plane)

  • @rogerkearns8094
    @rogerkearns8094 4 роки тому

    Very interesting, thank you.

  • @joanmartinsuarezloaiza2767
    @joanmartinsuarezloaiza2767 4 роки тому

    Hi Dr. Peyam, awesome like always, I would like you answer me a question, is it possible to apply the residue theorem to non definite integrals?, I have read books about Complex analysis but I never saw it, do you know where I can get info about it just in case it’s possible.

  • @Gamma_Digamma
    @Gamma_Digamma 4 роки тому +1

    Linear density of wire C, right?

  • @СашаФещенко-п2и
    @СашаФещенко-п2и 4 роки тому +1

    Waiting for the next video !

  • @anderrafaellinaresrojas3772
    @anderrafaellinaresrojas3772 4 роки тому

    Aplications on physics.Its so exciting.

  • @benjaminoyarzun7450
    @benjaminoyarzun7450 4 роки тому

    Very useful video! Could you do the same for flux and also for line and flux integrals in space? Thanks!

  • @green3487
    @green3487 Рік тому

    Thank you so much :)

  • @alexkonopatski429
    @alexkonopatski429 3 роки тому

    Nice Video and greetings from Germany

  • @Engineering_conceptsUOM
    @Engineering_conceptsUOM Рік тому

    Brilliant 🔥

  • @drake7897
    @drake7897 4 роки тому

    It would be fantastic if you can make a video about differential forms!

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 роки тому +1

      I’m considering it! Need to learn all of differential geometry now :)

  • @MsSlash89
    @MsSlash89 4 роки тому +5

    I'll never understand why he says "Thanks for watching" before the video starts.

    • @MsSlash89
      @MsSlash89 3 роки тому

      @Astronaut Posts Makes sense

  • @dgrandlapinblanc
    @dgrandlapinblanc 4 роки тому

    Thanks.

  • @mathadventuress
    @mathadventuress 4 роки тому

    Dr peyam
    I am studying this concept in calculus based physics, however we are using only 1 dimension.
    Mostly to see how much a spring compresses.
    I had hard time with this in calc 3. So I have to retake that class...
    I can see the application for this in one dimension
    In two dimensions or three dimensions, is the line sort of moving along a path? Like a particle falling in the sky?

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 роки тому

      Yeah it’s a particle moving on a path in 2d or 3d

    • @mathadventuress
      @mathadventuress 4 роки тому

      @@drpeyam so it doesn't have to be a straight line?

  • @kickbuzz6770
    @kickbuzz6770 4 роки тому +1

    Sir, how to find the line integral formula and how to relate it with the graphical diagram.Can u make a video on it.:(India)

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 роки тому +1

      It’s on my playlist

  • @oguzhantopaloglu9442
    @oguzhantopaloglu9442 4 роки тому +2

    Definitely WTF more videos of yours

  • @LarryRiedel
    @LarryRiedel 4 роки тому

    For that last note about f as density, that interpretation is used for statistical distributions, and so it's used in machine learning and AI.

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 роки тому +1

      Interesting!

  • @Uygʻun-q2c
    @Uygʻun-q2c 9 днів тому

    thanks, subscribed

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  9 днів тому

      Yay, thank you!!!

  • @kokoro1406
    @kokoro1406 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much

  • @andres_1277
    @andres_1277 4 роки тому

    You can do an math analysis course

  • @Galileo2pi
    @Galileo2pi 4 роки тому

    Great pal, kind regards

  • @dalibormaksimovic6399
    @dalibormaksimovic6399 2 роки тому

    Sir, can you please explain to me what is the line integral in Green's theorem. It has Pdx+Qdy, which is completely different than this, I don't know.

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  2 роки тому

      Check out my video on green’s theorem

  • @epicmorphism2240
    @epicmorphism2240 4 роки тому

    Could you do the inverse function of the gamma function?

  • @si48690
    @si48690 4 роки тому

    Thanks man

  • @kqp1998gyy
    @kqp1998gyy 4 роки тому

    Thank you

  • @cuteandfunny9154
    @cuteandfunny9154 Рік тому

    barikala!!! im from tehran. narmak

  • @ralphhebgen7067
    @ralphhebgen7067 Рік тому

    Oooooh “want to find”… 😂 I thought the acronym stood for something else… also accurate though 😀👍

  • @8dolev
    @8dolev 4 роки тому

    13:52 Yes, you are live and not just talking to yourself.

  • @gersantru
    @gersantru 4 роки тому

    Nice!

  • @kobethebeefinmathworld953
    @kobethebeefinmathworld953 4 роки тому

    Just a quick question to Dr Peyam: does UCI have a break tomorrow?

  • @sloppajoe9765
    @sloppajoe9765 4 роки тому

    Thank you very much on your videos, and love your abbreviation WTF xD.

  • @klam77
    @klam77 4 роки тому +7

    LOL: "WTF"..... who could imagine that calculus shows, that the "WTF" aka (area) is the mathematical inverse of "SLOPES". Areas and slopes are INVERSES.

    • @callmedeno
      @callmedeno 4 роки тому

      are areas and slopes really inverses or are they just the results of inverse operations?

    • @klam77
      @klam77 4 роки тому +2

      @@callmedeno they are in analytic approach of calculus where you PLOT slopes dy/dx as fxn of x, compared to PLOTS of original fxn Y(x). In this analytic frame, it's beginner calculus, slopes and areas are inverse to each other. (In reality, it's subtraction which produces dy/dx from y, and addition which produces y from dy/dx)

  • @eliyasne9695
    @eliyasne9695 4 роки тому

    Can you do a line integral on something crazy like the Koch snowflake?
    In such a case its might not even make sense to call it a "line" integral, its not even one dimensional.
    Does it mean that the only way to get a meaningful answer out of it is to make ds log3(4) dimensional?

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 роки тому

      Interesting! I don’t think a Koch snowflake works because it’s not rectifiable. You could use Lebesgue integration with the measure being Hausdorff measure?

  • @alephnull3535
    @alephnull3535 4 роки тому +1

    Do you think that you'd ever do a video on differential forms or the exterior derivative?

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 роки тому +2

      Eventually

    • @metawhirl4609
      @metawhirl4609 4 роки тому

      @@drpeyam can you do video on exterior products

  • @EdisonvsTesla
    @EdisonvsTesla 4 місяці тому

    Dr:We want To Find (WTF)
    Me: wtf!😅

  • @musik350
    @musik350 4 роки тому +1

    PIEM (Peyam) METHOD: Picture, InEquality, Maths

  • @carloshurtado8723
    @carloshurtado8723 4 роки тому

    8:24 C-Señor!! :)

  • @dominicellis1867
    @dominicellis1867 4 роки тому

    Holy shit I knew there was something to the trigonometric interpretation of the derivative the derivative of a function f is the tangent of the angle opposite of the small change in y dy and the 2nd derivative is the derivative of the tangent of this angle which is sec^2(theta) the derivative is represented by a point made by the tangent line the 2nd derivative is made from 3 points the 2 intersecting the secant line and the point in between them this creates a parabola in which there are 2 angles needed to represent it the amount of points needed to express the degree n of a derivative onto the function f(x) is 2n - 1 while the amount of angles needed to express degree n is 2^(n - 1) this can be expanded into higher dimensions this is also why no function increases faster than x = a where a is a constant because the angle theta has a boundary condition of being undefined at pi/2 because that would not be a triangle there would be more than one right angle the absolute value of the difference between angle dx and dy has to be greater than 0 by the definition of a triangle this means you could polarize the derivative in terms of theta by taking the inverse tangent of the derivative

  • @mathadventuress
    @mathadventuress 4 роки тому

    Also Dr peyam are you aware your content is made for kids so we don't get notified if you make new content?

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 роки тому +1

      I marked it not safe for kids

  • @JurassicPlank
    @JurassicPlank 4 роки тому

    Definitely had a dimebag.

  • @williamadams137
    @williamadams137 4 роки тому

    What happened to your buddy blackpenredpen?

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 роки тому

      He’s fine :)

  • @klam77
    @klam77 4 роки тому

    Is that a bonobos shirt? I think some of their shirts are cool, but everyone recognizes them now.

  • @otakuakira526
    @otakuakira526 Рік тому

    is he Young Sheldon
    🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @i_am_anxious0247
    @i_am_anxious0247 4 роки тому

    WTF UNDER F AND OVER C?!

  • @alejrandom6592
    @alejrandom6592 3 роки тому

    so that's what wtf means :O literally wtf?

  • @Flanlaina
    @Flanlaina 4 роки тому

    WTF!!!!

  • @andreamonteroso8586
    @andreamonteroso8586 4 роки тому

    wtf

  • @alannolan3514
    @alannolan3514 3 роки тому

    Go raibh míle maith agat

  • @Bjowolf2
    @Bjowolf2 4 роки тому

    WTF? 😂