Optimising an Air Engine

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 чер 2023
  • Get an exclusive Surfshark deal! Enter promo code STANTON for an extra 3 months free at surfshark.deals/stanton
    3D printed shark: www.printables.com/model/1780...
    Enjoy my videos? These are made possible due to help from my Patrons. Please consider supporting my efforts: / tomstanton
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    My Other Equipment:
    Main camera - amzn.to/2vlvlC6
    Main lens - amzn.to/2gMrhru
    Main tripod - amzn.to/2tqRjBt
    Secondary Tripod - amzn.to/2t1NkMh
    Microphone - amzn.to/2uuv9n0
    Audio recorder - amzn.to/2v3mjcG
    Banggood affiliate: www.banggood.com/?p=LT0710618...
    Twitter: / tomstantonyt
    3D Printer filament sponsored by 3D Printz UK: 3dprintz.co.uk/
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4,3 тис.

  • @TomStantonEngineering
    @TomStantonEngineering  11 місяців тому +369

    Get an exclusive Surfshark deal! Enter promo code STANTON for an extra 3 months free at surfshark.deals/stanton

    • @TheKnexMaker
      @TheKnexMaker 11 місяців тому +5

      I tried to email you, but no reply. I want to make a magnetic launch like your airplane launcher, but I want to use it for my model roller coasters. wonders if you could send me the reserch sources or any info or tips.

    • @xmysef4920
      @xmysef4920 11 місяців тому +4

      I believe this type of engine is called a ”head-valve” engine. It’s so interesting how incredibly simple it is and that it’s used in co2 plane and airhogs planes engines!
      (basically engines that have the piston hit the valve)

    • @heinrighbeukes6010
      @heinrighbeukes6010 11 місяців тому +3

      @Tom, good work on the engine design and printing. As for the Formlabs printer, I recommend you print the cylinder barrel slightly under by 0.1mm then use a sized rheem to get it to the correct size but remember to use rotate the rheem backward otherwise, you'll crack the resin print. (have made many smooth formlabs printed cylinders now)

    • @berkelek
      @berkelek 11 місяців тому +3

      Could you try to make it inline 4 or 6 ????

    • @GenBumbleBee
      @GenBumbleBee 11 місяців тому +3

      been watching for 6 years now. happy to u got a air hogs. every time u uploaded i would "get a air hogs" it would make the build easier to understand.

  • @judechandler5102
    @judechandler5102 11 місяців тому +5315

    This series is an internet treasure. I can't wait to see where it ends up. Please never stop having ridiculous ideas about using compressed air for propulsion.

    • @Doribi117
      @Doribi117 11 місяців тому +55

      I'd argue not a ridiculous idea, just difficult to pull off in an efficient manner

    • @jonslg240
      @jonslg240 11 місяців тому +30

      It definitely is super awesome
      He should try getting the compressed air by using heat from gasoline or a fuel oil.. 😉

    • @IronGoober
      @IronGoober 11 місяців тому +2

      Tom is my hero

    • @jonslg240
      @jonslg240 11 місяців тому +4

      @@Doribi117 something can be ridiculous and awesome at the same time =p
      This wasn't even his idea, it was someone else's..he is just improving on it =p

    • @chandlerknight-dl3uv
      @chandlerknight-dl3uv 11 місяців тому +3

      Connect a really long hose to a ground vehicle with the air supply!😁😁😁😁

  • @DrenImeraj
    @DrenImeraj 11 місяців тому +863

    Would be interesting to replace the metal pin with a screw and see how adjusting the length of the pin affects the performance

    • @giovanefortuna
      @giovanefortuna 11 місяців тому +34

      Or create a cylinder head with screw to adjust height

    • @PedroGarcia-fl1fu
      @PedroGarcia-fl1fu 11 місяців тому +14

      maybe an Idea? firstly you could increase the piston total movement (increasing chamber/cylinder length), when piston is going down and reach in middle of chamber the piston also reach in the chamber roles, releasing the air pressure and after that this roles will close (maybe using more rubber valves) and the piston will continue its movement going down, at this moment it will create a vacuum in the chamber when piston reach on bottom of cylinder helping the piston up again with vacuum in the chamber, this could create more power?

    • @wololo10
      @wololo10 11 місяців тому +23

      yes it would be like ajdusting your camshafts

    • @Rebar77_real
      @Rebar77_real 11 місяців тому +5

      Or notching back a steam engine's reverser.

    • @user-io2mk5ki2b
      @user-io2mk5ki2b 11 місяців тому +1

      @@PedroGarcia-fl1fu ua-cam.com/video/ZKuevq4J4Ak/v-deo.html

  • @privatepilot4064
    @privatepilot4064 10 місяців тому +100

    First rule of thumb. If you’re going to launch your model airplane into a field with only one branch, the plane will always gravitate to that branch. It’s a law.

    • @averitiamiku
      @averitiamiku 2 місяці тому +4

      If you are going to let an object gain motion and preferably travel through air with no real influence from the ground, any object that isn't grass will gravitationally attract it

    • @lilguilty
      @lilguilty 2 місяці тому +2

      Same goes for model rockets

  • @_..-.._..-.._
    @_..-.._..-.._ 10 місяців тому +192

    Crazy to think how little thrust you’d get by simply letting the air shoot out of the bottle through a jet nozzle, but through the miracle of science, it’ll make a ton of thrust for minutes on end. Very amazing! I’m impressed.

    • @statementleaver8095
      @statementleaver8095 10 місяців тому +9

      Requires reservoir bottle for Exhaust return 🤔🤔🤔
      Run time increase due to Return to source instead of vent to Atmosphere.

    • @wildesage4172
      @wildesage4172 10 місяців тому +11

      I often think about this as it relates to modern ICEs. You can push a few thousand pounds more than a hundred miles with just a few gallons of gas. That's crazy.

    • @-Pkji-
      @-Pkji- 10 місяців тому +1

      crazy ?

    • @OOICU812
      @OOICU812 10 місяців тому +4

      @@-Pkji-crazy amazing.

    • @funnyberries4017
      @funnyberries4017 10 місяців тому +2

      everything in the world is reliant on shapes and geometry

  • @secondengineer9814
    @secondengineer9814 11 місяців тому +1037

    Awesome to see the clear piston/chamber! Also, the methodology of using the syringe to pour the silicone was a really smart fix!

    • @MisterFizz
      @MisterFizz 10 місяців тому +5

      Agreeeeeeeeeeeed !

  • @Nighthawkinlight
    @Nighthawkinlight 11 місяців тому +1050

    3d printing is good for a lot of things, but a low friction piston cylinder is not one of them. You should design a piston and housing that fits a standard diameter glass or acrylic tube for the cylinder.

    • @TomStantonEngineering
      @TomStantonEngineering  11 місяців тому +500

      I've bought some acrylic tubes for this exact reason! I couldn't find any 12mm inside diameter tubes (diameter of my current seal design), so I ran out of time to re-design and mold new seals. But I will definitely experiment with the acrylic tubes for the 'aircraft worthy' engine!

    • @rbuddsdiy
      @rbuddsdiy 11 місяців тому +67

      ​@@TomStantonEngineeringmaybe something similar to the glass tube/graphite pistons from a company called Airpot. I got a free sample years ago to try and make a Sterling (Stirling?) engine and the fit and low friction is outstanding.

    • @daveycmusic
      @daveycmusic 11 місяців тому +19

      @@TomStantonEngineeringwould steel tubing work? You can get seamless hydraulic tube with 12mm ID

    • @vihreelinja4743
      @vihreelinja4743 11 місяців тому +27

      @@TomStantonEngineering Better option is to use a conical cylinder. and MACHINING. 3d printing is FAR AWAY from precision. as you stated there are air engines already in the market. why try to re invent the wheel since 3d printing will never have enough precision for something like this.

    • @VulpisFoxfire
      @VulpisFoxfire 11 місяців тому +52

      @@vihreelinja4743 On the one hand, note that even with his techniques, he's still improved over the engine on the market multiple times. On the other, imagine combining his techniques with their production quality...

  • @robertrainford301
    @robertrainford301 10 місяців тому +30

    I flew the original airhog in a field in Pennsylvania USA. The kids I wowed are now adults. I kept the carcass of that plane to showcase energy storage and transfer in my science classes. You really have done us a huge service dissecting and improving what you’ve uncovered! Thank you so much for your persistence!

  • @EvanAndKatelyn
    @EvanAndKatelyn 10 місяців тому +112

    Engineering is so freaking cool 🙌

  • @michaeljirava8404
    @michaeljirava8404 11 місяців тому +432

    An aircraft motor factory and aviation research center combined into one person. Impressive dedication and ingenuity. Wish you the best Tom, never stop!

    • @Judas1911WR1
      @Judas1911WR1 11 місяців тому +1

      if he can simplify his design and make a "toy-plane-air-engine" made out of items you can find at home like a 2liter pepsi bottle he could sell those "kits"

  • @ytrichardsenior
    @ytrichardsenior 11 місяців тому +332

    I am a British gen x engineer. I have to say you are great. Your content is great generally. Your delivery, editing, choice of project... every detail... but mostly it's your infectious tenacity and dilligence. Thank you for being a highlight in my youtube playlist. More power to your elbow!

  • @ChrisHarmon1
    @ChrisHarmon1 10 місяців тому +26

    Wow i was not expecting the first jump in performance and then the second jump also blew me away. Love the use of resin printing as well, amazing what a $200 machine can produce these days.

    • @one_of_gojos_simps6286
      @one_of_gojos_simps6286 10 місяців тому

      try more like 2000$ , but yeah still a really low price compared to most industrial grade ones

  • @billbates7810
    @billbates7810 10 місяців тому +9

    I had one of the early air hog planes similar to the one in the video. I think your video, research & development are really superb, I haven’t seen 3D printing in a “hobby” sense used to such exacting measures. God bless, Bill.

  • @yvan2218
    @yvan2218 11 місяців тому +470

    I'd love to see the original engineers of the toy plane react to this vid and see if they had the same issues or discoveries as you did!

    • @danolver913
      @danolver913 11 місяців тому +39

      I bet they wouldn't believe a (dare I say) hobbyist at home 3D printing his own computer designs and reviewing the slow motion footage to improve it. Technology ❤ no disrespect Tom you and your content is very professional but I feel you aim for the hobbyist vibe!

    • @OliverReinhard
      @OliverReinhard 11 місяців тому +35

      Wouldn’t be too surprised to learn that the original design was also done by hobbyists!

    • @TwitchyMofo
      @TwitchyMofo 11 місяців тому +7

      I really do hope someone from that team sees this video. I agree it would be amazing to see the discussion on the airhog design.

    • @Pomaufour
      @Pomaufour 11 місяців тому +3

      ​@@danolver913well he is studying engineering right ? So ofc it's a hobby. I definitely was not doing that on the side when I studied engineering.

    • @malloott
      @malloott 11 місяців тому +4

      ​@@danolver913judging by the fact this was first released in the mid 90's they probably didn't use any computer to design this and just did hand drawn designs and calculations like almost everything back then.

  • @Convolutedtubules
    @Convolutedtubules 11 місяців тому +183

    There is a lot to learn from this video. I especially liked the silicone moulding process and the R&D of the seal. Very rewarding to see it work better and better with each iteration.

  • @Mister_Mike
    @Mister_Mike 10 місяців тому +3

    I have been watching your videos for quite some time, and it's amazing to see your persistency and how far you've gone, great job!!
    Excited to see a plane working with it!

  • @limpingcow
    @limpingcow 10 місяців тому +2

    Bloody brilliant work. Also a great example of the iterative process. A lot of engineers who come out of projects, struggle with iteration. I think this is a great example of how reflection and research get you closer and closer to the optimal solution. The key is not allowing previous failures to discourage further iterations.

  • @FPVenius
    @FPVenius 11 місяців тому +127

    Dude... I love the way you break things down, show your process, analyze your "failures" (more like steps along the path forward,) and diagram things along the way. It's truly inspiring stuff.

  • @charleshartlaub3725
    @charleshartlaub3725 11 місяців тому +547

    I'd love to tell you the story of designing the airhogs, the engine and how long it took to perfect it. That seal was a breakthru to achieve consistency in production. The spring was equally important.
    keep up the good work.

    • @CFox.7
      @CFox.7 11 місяців тому +26

      you were involved ?

    • @chevyinlinesix
      @chevyinlinesix 11 місяців тому +16

      I hope he sees your comment.

    • @JordansDroid
      @JordansDroid 11 місяців тому +3

      Following hoping he sees this

    • @onedimensionaldave8147
      @onedimensionaldave8147 11 місяців тому +2

      Interesting 👀

    • @Zepdos
      @Zepdos 11 місяців тому +11

      Were you part of the design team for air hogs?

  • @clayballard6400
    @clayballard6400 10 місяців тому +2

    I’ve been watching this project since the start and I have to say it’s been awesome seeing you progress it. Thanks for the awesome content!

  • @nicgurkweitz389
    @nicgurkweitz389 10 місяців тому +2

    I used to have one of those air hogs when I was a kid and honestly didn't understand it too much because I didn't have much of a thought between my ears back then but I was really surprised on how well you explained it all and I really want to see you build a plane for this! This is looks so cool! Thank you for all your hard work and data!

  • @ColinRichardson
    @ColinRichardson 11 місяців тому +112

    Absolutely LOVING these research and development episodes..
    I absolutely love that you got hold of the original designs from decades ago, and then smashed the record of it using lessons from their own design..
    It does make me wonder if the seal inside the 25 year old box has over-hardened over all that time so is not working as well as it did new.

  • @woody3dp436
    @woody3dp436 11 місяців тому +217

    It's already been 4 years I made a 4 cylinder remix of your engine, and it's still an enjoyment to see you improving your design and sharing it. Thank you very much for everything.

    • @greggv8
      @greggv8 11 місяців тому +18

      Try making a compressed air version of a double or triple expansion steam engine. Those used pistons of increasing size and flowed the steam exhaust from one cylinder to the next to capture more of the power of the expanding steam.

    • @TM450FI
      @TM450FI 11 місяців тому +1

      @@greggv8turbo in a nutshell lol

    • @pilotavery
      @pilotavery 11 місяців тому +5

      @@TM450FI no, it would be more like the equivalent of running one of these engines off the extra air pressure coming out your tailpipe

    • @itzFYEB
      @itzFYEB 11 місяців тому +1

      how did you solve the problem created by the single sided crankshaft? did you use a traditional big end on the con rod or did you make a radial engine?

    • @itzFYEB
      @itzFYEB 11 місяців тому +5

      @@greggv8 there might not be sufficient pressure to allow for multiple cylinders, steam engines used these kinds of cylinders due to the fact that they had very high pressure and stroke lenghts that would allow for a limited amount of pressure difference between TDC and BDC.

  • @CFHoneyBadger
    @CFHoneyBadger 10 місяців тому

    This is now one of my favorite videos on UA-cam. It scratched that itch of designing and refining so perfectly. I loved watching this process. Keep up the great work!

  • @AnotherFreakingDude
    @AnotherFreakingDude 10 місяців тому +2

    That slow-mo footage is incredibly high quality, always a good day when Tom uploads another compressed air video.

  • @GoofballPaul
    @GoofballPaul 11 місяців тому +129

    YYEEEEESSSSSS this is one of my favourite series on youtube! I love to see the development of a technology unfold in front of my eyes! Keep it up! 👀
    With the performance of the older engines I felt like a model that more or less flies in a straight line is all that could ever be achieved, but this new design’s insane performance gives me hopes of one day seeing you put RC controls on it and being able to actually maneuver it!
    And there’s still the possibility of putting more bottles for longer runtime, seeing if it can withstand more than 60 psi... eheheh I drool at the possibilities.

    • @Convolutedtubules
      @Convolutedtubules 11 місяців тому +6

      Orgasmic engineering!

    • @macswanton9622
      @macswanton9622 11 місяців тому +1

      at some point a pressure regulator might be the biggest hurdle

    • @Convolutedtubules
      @Convolutedtubules 11 місяців тому +2

      @@macswanton9622 I'm sure Tom can come up with a neat design for an adjustable pressure regulator.

  • @rccrazer
    @rccrazer 11 місяців тому +90

    I genuinely treasure these videos and hearing that old airhogs sound again is great. I'm amazed at your improvements over this design and love seeing how your designs have actually been original! Please don't stop. I want to see how far this can go!

  • @burgundyknight6826
    @burgundyknight6826 10 місяців тому +4

    Oh wow, has it been that many years. Really love watching how your designs evolve.

  • @user-nm1gh1gc4j
    @user-nm1gh1gc4j 10 місяців тому

    its so satisfying seeing how much better each iteration is. its so satisfying seeing how much better each iteration is.

  • @haulngrassracing
    @haulngrassracing 11 місяців тому +149

    I found myself giggling with the efficiency numbers of the new engines because I couldn’t believe how efficient you have made these. Congratulations and well done. Looking forward to the next video.

  • @nick_riviera
    @nick_riviera 11 місяців тому +86

    I admire your resilience and passion to keep pushing and looking for better and more efficient options!

  • @wmhilton-old
    @wmhilton-old 10 місяців тому

    I had one of those Air Hogs toys as a kid! And I've loved watching your journey to recreate and improve on the air engine!

  • @ramble7717
    @ramble7717 10 місяців тому +1

    its so satisfying seeing how much better each iteration is

  • @eric1393
    @eric1393 11 місяців тому +80

    So excited to see one of your air powered planes really flying! Love this series!

  • @neilsawhney7182
    @neilsawhney7182 11 місяців тому +33

    I remember watching your initial air engine designs which largely influenced my choice to major in mechanical engineering. 5 years later and stuff like this still excites and inspires me, can't thank you enough.

  • @theinspector1023
    @theinspector1023 10 місяців тому

    Splendid.Excellent r&d! You really throw your heart and soul (and, I suspect, quite a lot of dosh) into your projects.
    Thank you.

  • @MegaMotionStudios
    @MegaMotionStudios 10 місяців тому +25

    Great stuff, I’d love to see you experiment with multiple piston designed engines. Perhaps starting with a v-twin!

    • @gamemeister27
      @gamemeister27 9 місяців тому +1

      Nah he going straight for the H 16

  • @BensMiniToons
    @BensMiniToons 11 місяців тому +29

    I've spent most of my life wanting to understand the Air Hogs air piston motor. It pops into my mind from time to time for the last 30 years. Amazing work! Seeing yours work puts my mind at rest. Thank you.

  • @karyjas1
    @karyjas1 11 місяців тому +23

    Wtf, thats like the thing that i wanted to see most for months. Thank you so much! This is my favorite content of which there isnt much. And you is how i found out what my favorite content is - optimisation, upgrading of designs + pneumatic and weird engines

  • @ryanrehfuss
    @ryanrehfuss 10 місяців тому +3

    Hi Tom, you might consider glancing at the piston heads used in airsoft cylinders. They use pressure to expand standard-sized nitrile o-rings outward which delivers very good sealing and high speed/cycle wear life. The design tolerances around the o-ring would need altering because existing designs only seal while the piston slides in the forward (for your engines, upward) direction. Not sure it's applicable for your engine but it does its job very well.

  • @mickv7545
    @mickv7545 10 місяців тому

    Good job on improving the engine, it's amazing to see your progress!

  • @JoshHenderson16
    @JoshHenderson16 11 місяців тому +78

    I'm not a massive gearhead or anything but I do so look forward to a Tom Stanton video dropping. It's such a perfect formula of sound chap breaks down relatively complex principles in a fun and absorbable way. And no UA-camy bells and whistles (obtrusive adds, shoutiness, OMG faces, overwrought camera work etc) Legend!

  • @julias-shed
    @julias-shed 11 місяців тому +20

    I’m impressed with the engineering that went into the original toy. Kudos for getting nearly 5x efficiency that’s incredible 😀

  • @alirayeen1714
    @alirayeen1714 23 години тому

    Clear Explanation is your Quality... Thank you bro... Keep Going...

  • @RcAircraft
    @RcAircraft 9 місяців тому

    I am glad you have returned to this project as I enjoyed your previous attempts.
    So much looking forward to seeing the model you will make for this project. 👍

  • @J4R3D_07
    @J4R3D_07 11 місяців тому +7

    11:49 "It's my first time"

  • @CortexSashimi
    @CortexSashimi 10 місяців тому

    Thats just beautiful man- Thanks for sharing this with all of us.

  • @gebhardt244
    @gebhardt244 2 місяці тому

    Great that you came Back to that Projekt.

  • @squishysheep5862
    @squishysheep5862 11 місяців тому +23

    Amazing! I think you should make a version where the piston is much smaller, increasing the run time significantly. Then, you can cut the engine weight down by making the walls thinner and using ribs and whatnot. Once you have an engine that has a long run time and is very light, you can make a plane out of light materials such as balsa wood and mylar. Then tune the plane and try and get it to fly for 2 minutes!

  • @ethanhermsey
    @ethanhermsey 11 місяців тому +38

    I honestly didn't think this project would get this far, those are some amazing results!

  • @rinshoragnarshid6162
    @rinshoragnarshid6162 10 місяців тому

    This is so cool. I am glad you have found some awesome solutions!

  • @jamesgeorge4874
    @jamesgeorge4874 10 місяців тому

    Back in the 80's, in the US, the "Air Jammer" compressed air powered car was my favorite toy, it utilized a cam lobe to activate the intake valve (a ball) , attaching a thick washer to the output gear, resulted in slightly slower speeds, but much longer run time. Cool vid.

  • @alexpym8216
    @alexpym8216 11 місяців тому +31

    It would definitely be worth trying an offset crankshaft to optimise power and efficiency on the piston downstroke.

  • @duanewente457
    @duanewente457 11 місяців тому +37

    This makes me miss my old Air Hogs plane, they were so much fun!
    Great detailed breakdown, same tactics I use while creating medical equipment. Keep up the great work!

  • @christianmcbain810
    @christianmcbain810 10 місяців тому

    Man childhood memories unlocked!!! That exact airhogs airplane taught me how cylinder engines work when I was a child.

  • @avoirdupois1
    @avoirdupois1 10 місяців тому

    I enjoy the way Tom shows his iterative process for solving engineering challenges.

  • @richuar
    @richuar 10 місяців тому +93

    The reason your original 40 shore seals were so hard to remove from the mould is that it’s a polyurethane resin being poured into a polyurethane resin mould so the materials actually want to bond to each other! You need to use a release agent on the mould to create a barrier between the materials or instead of using 40 shore PU material use a 40 shore silicone like RTV 240 or T4

  • @zenmark42
    @zenmark42 11 місяців тому +9

    I love your channel. You opened up a brand new toy from the 90s, took high speed photography of it's inner workings in operation, disassembled it, cast it's parts, published the findings of using it's methodology... I love how you're bringing out the forgotten engineering work people did and making what theoretically anyone could do... available for us all.

  • @shtopfl5247
    @shtopfl5247 10 місяців тому

    Wow I’m impressed by how well these simple engines work 😯👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

  • @Killin_365
    @Killin_365 10 місяців тому

    I had that exact model as a child. Thank You for the Nostalgia Bait. 😊

  • @willmorr
    @willmorr 11 місяців тому +21

    Very cool build! In addition to all the obviously fascinating engineering, I love how you label your graphs with outlined pictures of the motors instead of just text. It's a small detail (that I may steal) which really helps to make the data clear and follow-able.

  • @weeliano
    @weeliano 11 місяців тому +27

    I just simply love the step by step iterations you did to make the compressed air engine even better and also resorting to reverse engineer the original air hogs motor to get the highest efficiency. The thought process and the steps that goes into making this compressed air motor is extremely interesting to watch! Can't wait for the motor to fly! Great work Tom!

  • @chigeryelam4061
    @chigeryelam4061 10 місяців тому

    Really interesting to see you work through this process.

  • @chaseman113
    @chaseman113 10 місяців тому

    omg that was my favorite toy growing up.
    Thanks for playing with it.

  • @redheathan1386
    @redheathan1386 11 місяців тому +15

    I don’t ever look for his videos but when they pop up I’m so captivated by what he’s doing and how that I never can skip them. I live watching and learning.

  • @Londrino
    @Londrino 11 місяців тому +61

    Having been a follower of the air engine saga from the beginning, it's pretty cool to see the massive improvement that happened after going back to the source. The real lessons were inside -us- airhogs all along.

    • @Corrodias
      @Corrodias 10 місяців тому +3

      What cruel irony that he practically re-invented the original design before getting ahold of one. But, oh well, at least it was fun.

    • @AerialWaviator
      @AerialWaviator 10 місяців тому +1

      Tom has gone full circle, re-inventing what had be forgotten, or unknown to him.
      This not unlike the real world, where NASA is reinventing technologies to land humans on the Moon again after more than 50 years.

  • @terradaktill1179
    @terradaktill1179 10 місяців тому

    I think these are really cool! I used to watch these awhile back and was amazed and I was very happy to see that they are still being made

  • @jazz1on
    @jazz1on 9 місяців тому

    Yes please - more. Always thinking and trying, great work.

  • @user-db2oo6wj2d
    @user-db2oo6wj2d 11 місяців тому +34

    You do a fantastic job creating these animations. Great video Tom!. Congratulations on your engineering successes. Those last graphs entered beast mode .

  • @theawesomebrick
    @theawesomebrick 11 місяців тому +23

    It’s so easy to get caught up in one half of the R&D process that you completely forget about and neglect the other. This video is a good reminder of the strides you can make when you remember to stop and do a little more research, or a couple more iterations.
    On a different note, I’m very interested in seeing how much further you can improve the engine! The Air Hogs design is likely optimized for mass production rather than performance, so there’s probably many strides you can make on that front. It’d be interesting to see the effect of adjusting bore&stroke measurements, but that’d be a lot of printing… I’m sure there’s probably some equation for that somewhere 😊

  • @apollow4153
    @apollow4153 7 місяців тому

    Awesome stuff! Very impressive that so much was self made in these projects🔥

  • @parkeropatz-johnson9124
    @parkeropatz-johnson9124 10 місяців тому

    Amazing work bro I've loved your air engines since the start it amazing to see you make such I big jump in progress keep up the good work

  • @GuitarSamurai17
    @GuitarSamurai17 11 місяців тому +17

    The amount of pure dopamine I receive from watching you make the engine more efficient and present it in such an understandable way is shocking but well done Tom excellent progress on the engine and really clever upgrades I absolutely love it

  • @fredrikcarlen3212
    @fredrikcarlen3212 11 місяців тому +15

    This is impressive! Like really impressive!
    Experimenting with multi cylinder engines would be cool. I'll bet a V-twin version of this would be sick!

    • @TrollingAround
      @TrollingAround 11 місяців тому +1

      Multiple cylinders will multiply the:
      A: Thrust (is good)
      B: Friction (is bad)
      C: Other Losses (is bad)
      E: Air consumption (is bad depending on point A)
      F: Coolness (is COOL!)
      Feel free to comment on point D!

    • @asdaneedsfunds
      @asdaneedsfunds 11 місяців тому +1

      It will also go some way to eliminate the requirement for the flywheel to create the cylinder compression, since the other cylinder can now provide that. Unfortunately a V2 would probably be a bit unreliable (especially on a plane) because the ball valve is sealed by gravity as well as pressure - although maybe the effect of gravity isn't very much given the high pressure air pushing the ball out?
      Either way, I'd vote for an inline 2 engine.

    • @TrollingAround
      @TrollingAround 11 місяців тому

      @@asdaneedsfunds - 2x Inline = 2x COOL!

    • @TakeNoShift
      @TakeNoShift 11 місяців тому

      @@asdaneedsfunds Wouldn't you still want a flywheel? Stores energy for the compression stroke, helps keep the engine running smoother. I wouldn't eliminate the flywheel, I would just adjust the weight of it until you get peak efficiency.

    • @jttech44
      @jttech44 11 місяців тому

      @@TrollingAround Double expansion makes it worth it. Steam engines used this technique, works on air engines too. Basically you just run a second engine optimized for lower pressure and feed it off the exhaust of the first engine. You're not consuming additional air, friction is still fairly minimal, and you extract way more power because your two cylinders are tuned to run at the pressures they'll normally see.
      Only real downside is complexity.

  • @elmzsni
    @elmzsni 10 місяців тому

    Awesome to see the progress and R&D; great content!

  • @Lumencraft-
    @Lumencraft- 10 місяців тому

    You sure put a lot of work into these videos Tom! Thanks for sharing

  • @Grebogoborp
    @Grebogoborp 10 місяців тому +9

    It’s always cool to see people who devote immense amounts of time and effort into such completely niche topics purely for their own enjoyment

  • @shady123x
    @shady123x 10 місяців тому +19

    Congratulations Tom. You were able to make this new piston better in so many ways. This really does show that the simpler, the better.

    • @davidhayes3257
      @davidhayes3257 10 місяців тому +2

      "Too many moving parts" is a real thing!

  • @ArbitraryConstant
    @ArbitraryConstant 2 місяці тому

    this was an absolutely fascinating process

  • @mungtor
    @mungtor 10 місяців тому +1

    Pretty cool. About 40 years ago, my brother and I had some toys called the Air Jammer Road Rammer made by a company called Tomy. You would use the included pump to pressurize a tank on the car, and then give it a push and off it went. We spent hours upon hours jumping it down the kitchen step or who knows what else. Thanks for the cool content (and the memory).

    • @michaelmaloy6378
      @michaelmaloy6378 10 місяців тому

      I remember those!
      Never had one, but I remember that the commercial's tune was a bit of an earworm.
      LOL
      Thanks for the memory! :D

  • @tommccallister
    @tommccallister 11 місяців тому +7

    I think this is my favourite video on the channel so far. I love the thought process you go through on these neat projects.

  • @hvip4
    @hvip4 11 місяців тому +14

    I love it, you make the R&D part so interesting. Looking forward to seeing it fly 😊

  • @ttchmp
    @ttchmp 10 місяців тому

    A very well done video. Love the slow motion

  • @patrickdoyle6519
    @patrickdoyle6519 10 місяців тому

    I can't tell you how pleased I am with my UA-cam algorithm today. So glad I "stumbled" on to your video today. Shared with friends I knew would appreciate it just as much. Cheers!

  • @canonicaltom
    @canonicaltom 11 місяців тому +13

    Like some other people in the comments already said, a dashpot (precision ground glass cylinder with a matched graphite piston) should improve your performance even more. It's a very common part in low-delta-T Stirling engines and should be reasonably available.

  • @noahlemay-assh2651
    @noahlemay-assh2651 11 місяців тому +11

    I know this man takes a long time but it still blows my mind just how many times and just how much he can improve the design.

  • @sygnusadun4832
    @sygnusadun4832 10 місяців тому

    This has been a wild ride of a channel watching you R&D this project phase after phase. Glorious.

  • @jerrymcarthur2062
    @jerrymcarthur2062 2 місяці тому

    what a great video and never would have suspected the airhogs had some decent engineering behind them!

  • @Enderbro3300
    @Enderbro3300 11 місяців тому +9

    This is so cool!! I love seeing the whole development process and everything!

  • @austiwawa
    @austiwawa 11 місяців тому +7

    You do a fantastic job creating these animations. Great video Tom!

  • @bananasandbass
    @bananasandbass 10 місяців тому

    This is awesome Tom! I love to see the development process

  • @alexchapman7157
    @alexchapman7157 10 місяців тому

    this is the first video of yours ive seen. Had me subscribed in the first 3 mins. Looking forward to following your content!

  • @jghanson25
    @jghanson25 11 місяців тому +3

    I love that you are revisiting this. Easily my favorite series of yours to follow. I’m excited to see what you end up finding in the end.

  • @watermelon5521
    @watermelon5521 11 місяців тому +5

    Wow, it is so satisfying seeing your engines improve so much!

  • @Turnaround_
    @Turnaround_ 10 місяців тому

    Have always loved watching How It Made, and I absolutely adore the sound of the engine - thanks for entertaining a layman 😎

  • @callmeletstalkswgoh8182
    @callmeletstalkswgoh8182 10 місяців тому

    I had this plane! Loved it. So fast and it would go so far

  • @vne5195
    @vne5195 11 місяців тому +4

    I appreciate the tremendous amount of work that went into producing this video. We are fortunate to have your content.

  • @Zac.J
    @Zac.J 11 місяців тому +5

    Love this little series on air powered engines! It's crazy how far you've taking them!

  • @rpavlik1
    @rpavlik1 10 місяців тому

    Pretty cool! I love the idea of using the syringe to de-gas the silicone!

  • @thqp
    @thqp 8 місяців тому

    Very interesting to see the whole build process behind this engine!