NASA's clever technique to make combustion chambers

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 кві 2023
  • Get Nebula using my link for 40% off an annual subscription: go.nebula.tv/breakingtaps
    Watch my exclusive video on Electroplating Diamond Tools for CNC machining glass: nebula.tv/videos/breakingtaps...
    --------------------------
    Etsy shop: www.etsy.com/listing/14516567...
    Printables STL download: www.printables.com/model/4591...
    --------------------------
    Today we're looking at how the regenerative cooling channels on Space Shuttle's main combustion chamber were manufactured. They used a combination of conventional machining with electroplating, in a really clever technique to mimic what we can do with 3D printing nowadays.
    🥰 CONSIDER SUBSCRIBING 🥰
    🔬Patreon if that's your jam: / breakingtaps
    📢Twitter: / breakingtaps
    📷Instagram: / breakingtaps
    💻Discord: / discord
    --------------------------
    📚 Sources! So many sources! 🥵
    Everyday Astronaut Rocket cooling: • Why don't rocket engin... (everydayastronaut.com/engine-...)
    Kazaroff, John M., and George A. Repas. _Conventionally cast and forged copper alloy for high-heat-flux thrust chambers_. No. NASA-TP-2694. 1987. ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/1...
    Akpati, Anthony U. "SSME Main Combustion Chamber (MCC)'hot Oil'Dewaxing." _Aerospace Environmental Technology Conference_. No. NASA-CR-202079. 1994. ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/1...
    "Electroplating offers embrittlement protection" ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19790...
    Rocket Science - The success story of Ariane 5 (Pt 1) | Full Documentary • Rocket Science - The s...
    NASA ‘Smart Manufacturing’ Updates, Tests Engine Part To Reduce Costs. www.nasa.gov/exploration/syst...
    Kazaroff, John M., and Albert J. Pavli. "Advanced tube-bundle rocket thrust chambers." Journal of Propulsion and Power 8.4 (1992): 786-791. ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/1...
    Pauckert, R. P. _Space storable regenerative cooling investigation Final report, Jul. 1967-May 1970_. No. NASA-CR-72705. 1970.. ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/1...
    Czacka, Z., and S. Hammer. _Development of advanced fabrication techniques for regeneratively cooled thrust chambers by the electroforming process Final report_. No. NASA-CR-72698. 1967.. ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/1...
    Agosta, V. D., and S. S. Hammer. _development of electroforming techniques for the fabrication of rocket engine injectors final report, phase 2_. No. NASA-CR-101801. 1969.. ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/1...
    Quentmeyer, R. "Rocket combustion chamber life-enhancing design concepts." _26th Joint Propulsion Conference_. 1990.. ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/1...
    Rocketdyne, A. "THE USE OF ALLOY 718 IN THE SPACE SHUTTLE MAIN ENGINE.". www.tms.org/Superalloys/10.74...
    Bradley, D., & Van Hooser, K. (2011). Space Shuttle Main Engine - The Relentless Pursuit of Improvement. AIAA SPACE 2011 Conference & Exposition. doi:10.2514/6.2011-7159
    Loewenthal, William, and David Ellis. "Fabrication of GRCop-84 rocket thrust chambers." _Materials Science and Technology 2005 Conference and Exhibition_. 2006.. ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/2...
    Hannum, Ned P., and R. G. Price Jr. _Some effects of thermal-cycle-induced deformation in rocket thrust chambers_. No. NASA-TP-1834. 1981.. ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/1...
    Ellis, David L., and Gary M. Michal. _Mechanical and thermal properties of two Cu-Cr-Nb alloys and NARloy-Z_. No. NASA-CR-198529. 1996. ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19970...
    Gradl, Paul R. "Rapid Fabrication techniques for liquid rocket channel wall nozzles." _52nd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference_. 2016. ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/2...
    Gradl, Paul R., and Christopher S. Protz. "Channel wall nozzle manufacturing technology advancements for liquid rocket engines." _International Astronautical Congress (IAC), 2019_. No. M19-7683. 2019. ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/2...
    Byrd, Tom. "The J-2X upper stage engine: from design to hardware." _46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit_. 2010.. ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/2...
    Lee, Jonathan A., and Stephen Woods. "Hydrogen embrittlement." (2016). ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/2...
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,4 тис.

  • @BreakingTaps
    @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +411

    I am honestly stunned how quickly those extra combustion chambers sold out! 🤯 I assumed they would dribble out over a few months, instead of a few days! If you still want one, I'm going to make another small batch. There's a "notify me when in stock" button on Etsy if you're interested. Thanks to everyone that purchased the first batch, hope you like them!

    • @kyohiromitsu4010
      @kyohiromitsu4010 Рік тому +2

      3d printing has very low strength.

    • @Eduardo_Espinoza
      @Eduardo_Espinoza Рік тому +1

      I was thinking of doing something like this, awesome how it turned out! :)

    • @1islam1
      @1islam1 Рік тому +2

      @@kyohiromitsu4010 🔴 What Is Islam?
      🔴 Islam is not just another religion.
      🔵 It is the same message preached by Moses, Jesus and Abraham.
      🔴 Islam literally means ‘submission to God’ and it teaches us to have a direct relationship with God.
      🔵 It reminds us that since God created us, no one should be worshipped except God alone.
      🔴 It also teaches that God is nothing like a human being or like anything that we can imagine.
      🌍 The concept of God is summarized in the Quran as:
      📖 { “Say, He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He does not give birth, nor was He born, and there is nothing like Him.”} (Quran 112:1-4) 📚
      🔴 Becoming a Muslim is not turning your back to Jesus.
      🔵 Rather it’s going back to the original teachings of Jesus and obeying him.
      More ....

    • @kyohiromitsu4010
      @kyohiromitsu4010 Рік тому +12

      @@1islam1 lol

    • @CountryDick
      @CountryDick Рік тому

      Did shit.

  • @JKTCGMV13
    @JKTCGMV13 Рік тому +1494

    I worked at Rocketdyne (builders of the RS-25, RL-10, F1, etc.) for 3 years. I did software though, so I can’t comment on the manufacturing process other than to say they have MASSIVE lathes.

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +246

      Oh man, yeah I bet the manufacturing facility is wild! Would love to tour it some day!

    • @Splarkszter
      @Splarkszter Рік тому +45

      @@BreakingTaps +1 i would love to see that too.

    • @Xsiondu
      @Xsiondu Рік тому +12

      Me +3

    • @JKTCGMV13
      @JKTCGMV13 Рік тому +19

      They did occasional tours of the campus (they have some engines on display) but I don’t know if those tours went through the manufacturing area. They might’ve? They have parts on display in there too. Not sure what it takes to get on a tour like that

    • @thatyoutubeguy7583
      @thatyoutubeguy7583 Рік тому +3

      Why can’t you comment? Is it a national security issue

  • @papparocket
    @papparocket Рік тому +133

    Great job! It does look a lot like the chambers NASA and the industry made. While the Narloy Z is much stronger than pure copper, it isn't strong enough by itself to withstand the very high chamber pressures. Beside the hydrogen embrittlement, the nickel closeout (usually including a small percentage of copper, aluminum and titanium such as in the K500 nickel alloy that resulted in precipitation hardening) was as thick as it was because it is what provides the structural strength. One additional thing we added in the late 1980s when trying to qualify engines of this type for use in expander cycles rocket engines to be used in upper stage rocket was *very* thin "V" shaped slots opening to the inside of the chamber that went about halfway up the lands (wall between coolant channels). This is because the hydrogen *inside* those channels are at a far higher pressure than the combustion gases inside the chamber. In our engine the chamber pressure was 3000 psi while the discharge pressure of the hydrogen turbopump was about 6000 psia. When the engine is running, the thermal expansion and high pressure loads cause the copper in the lands to undergo plastic deformation (which means that it won't fully spring back to its original shape). As a result when the engine is turned off and cools cracks often form in the lands and those cracks are usually at the point of highest stress, which is the corners of the channels.
    The engine I worked on was targeted to replace our workhorse engine the Pratt & Whitney RL-10. Upper stage engines have to start not once, but at least twice during a mission. Their first burn is during the last phase of the initial launch to complete insertion of the upper stage into low earth orbit. At that point the engine is shutdown and completely cools off. Then at some point up to several hours later the engine has to be reignited to send the upper stage into a transfer orbit to a higher orbit (such as sending a communications satellite to geostationary orbit).
    The start sequence of an engine involves a chill down where hydrogen is slowly flowed through the engine to reduce temperature to -427 F (temp of LH2). This is need for many reasons too many to bore you with here. But an undesirable effect is that the lands shrink way down. They are designed to do that when there are no cracks. But if cracks formed because the lands were crushed during the first burn, the chill down will cause those cracks to expand greatly because the copper loses a lot of its ductility at those very low temperatures and so is much more prone to cracking, especially if there is already a small crack to serve as a starting point.
    As the engine pressure and temperature rise during the second burn, the cracks in the copper can cause the wall between the coolant channel and the chamber to fail and the hydrogen will flow through into the chamber at that point. The amount of propellant lost from the failure of a single channel isn't huge, but the main effect is that the portion of the channel downstream of where the fracture was is now no longer being cooled and quickly melts through. Also the lands between channels need hydrogen on both sides of them to keep them from becoming too hot. With no hydrogen flowing in a chamber because it leaked out upstream first the wall between the channel and the chamber melts. Then with combustion gases on the lands between the channels on each side, the temperature of the land gets too high and also fails. Now there are three channels that have failed. Quickly the zipper effect results in a total failure of the engine.
    The V shaped slots serve as a way to reduce the stress in the lands. As the engine heats up and pressures rise the copper in the lands begin to expand and the V slots in the lands close. But because the portion of the expansion where the V was closing didn't result in any stress, the final stress level is much lower than it would be without the V and the copper never reaches a level where it undergoes plastic deformation. As a result when the engine is shut down the first time, the copper in the lands returns to its previous shape without cracks forming and the V slots open back up. Then without the cracks when the engine is restarted there is a *much* reduced chance the walls of the hydrogen cooling channels will fracture and the second burn goes as anticipated.

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +27

      This is really fascinating, thanks for sharing all the extra details! I had read about the "doghouse effect" making the channels themselves thin over time and eventually rupture, but hadn't read about the space in between the channels experiencing issues. That's really interesting! And seems like a really elegant/simple solution to what was probably a really complicated problem to analyze. Super neat, thanks for sharing! ♥

  • @jonnyj.
    @jonnyj. Рік тому +535

    Its so mindblowing how the rs-25, an engine designed in the early 70's, is considered probably the 2nd most advanced and efficient rocket engine ever flown to this day. More insane is that the design has literally not changed, from the metallurgy of the turbopumps to the tolerances and manufacturing techniques. The ones on the sls are the same ones that were flown on the space shuttle.

    • @andrewdoesyt7787
      @andrewdoesyt7787 Рік тому +56

      It’s even more mind blowing the that #1 most efficient rocket engine, the rl-10, is even older?

    • @Wolfiecolada
      @Wolfiecolada Рік тому +52

      "more advanced" doesn't always mean "better". fewer moving parts and simpler designs often are more efficient and reliable. just ask munro.

    • @ahfreebird
      @ahfreebird Рік тому +17

      @@Wolfiecolada I did. He just started ranting about MBAs being useless???

    • @avroarchitect1793
      @avroarchitect1793 Рік тому +27

      @@Wolfiecolada yup, this is why SpaceX is blowing up so many prototype engines trying to perfect the Raptor family of engines. Despite going for the most difficult combustion cycle type it is simpler in parts while being more efficient.

    • @huntercooke9592
      @huntercooke9592 Рік тому +2

      They built the V1 rocket in 1944 and where the Rs-25 got its fundamentals

  • @infinitetradecraft1837
    @infinitetradecraft1837 Рік тому +196

    Based on my research into NARloy-Z a few years ago, the silver raised the thermal conductivity and inhibited oxygen mobility in the copper, while the zirconium aided in forming a refractory oxide layer, much like aluminum and titanium, which resisted the highly oxidizing environment of the combustion chamber. It was the same alloy used in the linear aerospike planned for replacing the F1 engine, and that engine used aluminum backing structures to provide mechanical strength, while the copper formed the chamber walls. As a hoop structure, the need for additional bracing was minimized in the SSME.

    • @doyleself6849
      @doyleself6849 Рік тому +4

      Hey you win that's over my head thanks.

    • @pucmahone3893
      @pucmahone3893 Рік тому +2

      Ahhhh….yea…..I believe you know what you are saying…..
      Way over my head!

    • @tysonristau4995
      @tysonristau4995 Рік тому +1

      Aerospikes are cool

    • @malibudan
      @malibudan Рік тому

      More detail please?

  • @EverydayAstronaut
    @EverydayAstronaut Рік тому +135

    Woah! Awesome to see our website and thanks for the shout out!!! Great video, love this!!!

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +19

      Thanks Tim! Huge fan of your work, really great educational videos!

    • @TecSanento
      @TecSanento 7 місяців тому

      May be this tells you why recreating the rs-25 engines for the sls is this expansive.
      It looks like a process that's slow and hand work, with lots of possible problems - causing imperfect parts blowing up the bill

  • @ibbylancaster8981
    @ibbylancaster8981 Рік тому +44

    Dude, my dad would have loved your channel. He was a machinist, woodworker,etc. He worked for 35 years at NC State University College of Architectural/Product Design in the shop that the students went to , turning drawings into reality. It was wood, metal and plastic capable (Back in the late 70’s) and grew with time and technology. Unfortunately he passed away last year, but the numbers of lives he touched over the years are vast. A lot of “tools” left with him. Much love from North Carolina. Glad that I found your channel.

    • @carl2591
      @carl2591 Рік тому +3

      GO PACK!! fun to see someone from a local, to us, college.. I bet my BIL know him, maybe.. engineering student in the 80's.. sorry for your loss.. sounds like he was one of the greats..

    • @ibbylancaster8981
      @ibbylancaster8981 Рік тому +1

      @@carl2591 thanks. Dad worked at School of product and Architectural Design. He probably knew some of the same folks. Much love from Raeford 🤙🤙and definitely Go Pack! Aaaaahhhhhhoooooooooo!

  • @allakin8574
    @allakin8574 Рік тому +69

    I was an electroplating process engineer at Rocketdyne from 1975 - 1980 and worked on the RS-25 (known as SSME in my day). Much of your description is spot on, but we had buckets of Secret Sauce (tips, tricks, techniques, process controls) that took 6-8 years to develop in the engineering lab and then transition to a production environment. I can’t tell if the art has been lost, or you omitted for brevity.

    • @born-in-Atlanta
      @born-in-Atlanta 11 місяців тому +3

      I LOVE your “secret sauce” reference.

    • @wheelsandwings28
      @wheelsandwings28 11 місяців тому +6

      ok now reveal it

    • @acarrillo8277
      @acarrillo8277 11 місяців тому +4

      @@wheelsandwings28 He can't, ITAR

    • @TrainWorxStudio
      @TrainWorxStudio 11 місяців тому +1

      The art has not been lost. Look out for the ITER beam source grids 👌

    • @StarGateSG7
      @StarGateSG7 2 місяці тому +2

      These days using electroplating is a tad old-fashioned when you can thick-film sputter in a vacuum chamber Aluminum Oxide ceramics (i.e. Corundums aka Sapphire-like) coatings and then Tungsten coatings which can withstand 3,422°C (6,191.6°F) ....AND... if you want to go more exotic, use thick-film sputtered Hafnium Carbide to get 4000°C (7232°F) worth of thermal protection onto your 6061-series or 7075-series Aluminum CNC-machined and cyrogenically surface hardened combustion chambers and nozzles!
      AND nowadays I can also design and machine via CAD/CAM/FEA an entire hemispherical combustion chamber into three parts and have the cooling channel grooves CNC-machined as half-circles on the outer and inner surfaces and then fully-align when bolted together. You can even use 6061 series aluminum or 7075 series Aluminum and just coat with a Corundum and then a Tungsten or Hafnium Carbide layer for maximum thermal protection.
      Much cheaper and easier than using these Copper/Silver alloys!
      V

  • @shaunhall960
    @shaunhall960 Рік тому +15

    I was a kid back in the 70's and our next door neighbor was a rocket scientist for the Apollo 14. I remember her talking about how they built the rocket. She is the one that really got me into astronomy. Love you Sue!

    • @KnowL-oo5po
      @KnowL-oo5po Рік тому

      you will be alive to see 1 million people in mars

  • @6alecapristrudel
    @6alecapristrudel Рік тому +9

    Since you seem like a fan of plating, I'd like to share my recipe for making parts conductive without graphite. It's an alternate acid version of the silver mirror Tollens test thing. Sometimes things you want to plate get destroyed by base. Say PLA which gets eaten by base and basic silver baths don't stick. So what do you do? Make evil silver lemonade. Ironically metal doesn't play well with it unless it's already silver but it is what it is.
    I keep 4 stock solutions:
    A)10mg/mL AgNO3
    B)100mg/mL Citric acid
    C)10mg/mL Na2EDTA
    D)10mg/ml Ascorbic acid - vitamin C
    Get 1 part of A, B and C and mix together. Then add 2 parts of D to start plating.
    To activate stuff for plating make some SnCl2 in HCl (to keep it from hydrolyzing). I add whatever amount of my 100mg/mL SnCl2 stock to enough water to soak the part. After the tin soln. rinse off lightly with distilled water and soak in dilute AgNO3. 1 or 2 ml of soln. A in whatever water to soak it again. This seeds silver nanoparticles on whatever your substrate is. Sometimes you can see clear objects get a slight brown tint.
    The plating solution is truly electroless for a few minutes and only plates activated stuff but then starts plating more and more and crashes out silver powder. Rinse out the parts after activation and before plating to remove loose Ag NPs and extend the time before it crashes out. I've had items completely silvered while the solution was perfectly clear and the container wasn't plated at all.
    Still plenty good enough for seed layers without base, ammonia or formaldehyde. ..

    • @iBlue0riginal
      @iBlue0riginal Рік тому +2

      I'll totally steal this.

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +3

      Cheers for the tip! This is going straight into my notes on plating for future use ♥

  • @coyotedomino
    @coyotedomino Рік тому +15

    thought it was gonna be a simpler lost wax casting, but lost wax electroplating-! that’s a really cool technique. excited to see you on N☆!

  • @PsRohrbaugh
    @PsRohrbaugh Рік тому +33

    I've never had anything against 3d printing, but this video does an amazing job of showing how much you can fabricate with older techniques and a little cleverness.

    • @hobbified
      @hobbified Рік тому +3

      Sure, 3D printing doesn't make anything *new*. It just makes some things *cheaper*.

    • @M_Northstar
      @M_Northstar Рік тому +2

      ...And a LOT of patience: 1 cm of nickel plating at 20 microns an hour would take 500 hours, nearly 3 weeks, nonstop.

    • @PsRohrbaugh
      @PsRohrbaugh Рік тому

      I 100% agree with both replies! I just feel traditional machinists don't get enough credit by the "wow 3d printing" crowd who often seem like they believe 20 years ago all we had were hammers and chisels.
      With a bit of clever thinking, plus technologies like EDM or electroplating, you could fabricate quite complex parts. Sure there are advantages to drawing something in CAD and clicking "print", but it's kinda like desktop publishing in the 90s - it had an impact on what the common person could do much more than the professional.

    • @bumpstart21
      @bumpstart21 10 місяців тому

      @@PsRohrbaugh Right. Years ago I was the cnc nerd kid who worked with some real old school tool makers. They would show me some interesting techniques like crush grinding for complex form grinding. Maybe just to remind me what up :)

  • @mikedrop4421
    @mikedrop4421 Рік тому +10

    The way they built the huge bells for the F16 was amazing. They built the largest brazing kilns in the world to fuse the cooling tubes together and when that NASA executive said we can't go to the moon anymore that was part of what they were talking about. They don't have the equipment or people capable of that kind of braising anymore.

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +5

      Straight up nuts. It still astounds me they were able to build those giant engines at the time. Had to quite literally build all the infrastructure to even manufacture the things. On the note of lost-tech, the original company that did the Narloy-Z castings dismantled the equipment for it after making the shuttle blanks. And it was a proprietary process, so NASA has more recent papers talking about replacements for the alloy and manufacturing it since they can't just re-use the same as before 😢

  • @wktodd
    @wktodd Рік тому +73

    Interesting technique. You may get better plating results if you have motion between the part and the electrode , to even out the field strength. A commercialL brightening agent would also help

    • @kilomike5792
      @kilomike5792 Рік тому +4

      That would help, but he would still get the dendritic growth. He needs a pulse plating power supply to really improve the quality.

    • @BariumCobaltNitrog3n
      @BariumCobaltNitrog3n Рік тому

      @@kilomike5792 And maybe a bigger part. Soo tiny...

  • @naota3k
    @naota3k Рік тому +4

    This is truly the best website. Videos like this being freely available is an incredible feat of the internet. I love it.

  • @integza
    @integza Рік тому +37

    This is a really cool method ! Thank you for sharing!

  • @keatoncampbell820
    @keatoncampbell820 Рік тому +47

    As a welder I want to recreate the brazed channel nozzle to make an engine.
    I believe they used torch brazing, which makes my head hurt. I want to create a small motor with tig brazing.
    If you want I can make a nozzle to whatever specs you want, I have a small lathe I could use to bring it into tolerance.
    Would be useful for you for testing!

    • @infinitetradecraft1837
      @infinitetradecraft1837 Рік тому +3

      We were working with some students a few years ago on a regenerative cooled small scale engine, and had some reasonable luck with furnace brazing, but I think either way there's always *some* torch work. Tig brazing could definitely add some automation to the process, but the stacks of tubes are so pretty it almost begs to be hand made.

    • @keatoncampbell820
      @keatoncampbell820 Рік тому +2

      @@infinitetradecraft1837 I agree! Tig brazing would be easier for hand brazing only on a smaller nozzle, there's some necessary amount of heat bleed around the working area required to prevent distortion later when heating and cooling.
      It's really hard to compete with hydrocarbon combustion in terms of generating heat but tig is still very nice bc the precision it can offer is ridiculous!

    • @ovanai6277
      @ovanai6277 11 місяців тому +1

      @@keatoncampbell820 Are you sure your combustion chamber can export to USA or some other countries? I think it's quite difficult to export for some kind of combustion chamber which is about 4 to 5 times bigger than the one mentioned in the video.

    • @ovanai6277
      @ovanai6277 11 місяців тому +1

      @@keatoncampbell820 I hope you can finish well with your combustion chamber. Wish you always success in your work.

    • @keatoncampbell820
      @keatoncampbell820 11 місяців тому +1

      @@ovanai6277 i live in the United snakes myself so shipping around is less of an issue. Truly the biggest issue with shipping big metal hunks is the cost of freight due to specialized equipment, and I am poor

  • @badherodot
    @badherodot Рік тому +6

    Very cool to see this technique used in manufacturing like that. It reminds me a lot of the lost-wax casting method that’s been used in bronze sculpture for thousands of years. Thank you for sharing!

  • @wildgophers91
    @wildgophers91 Рік тому +19

    You know I don't typically enjoy the "WATCH ME BREATHLESSLY EXPLAIN SCIENCE" videos, but I'm really enjoying your presentation style in this one. (maybe because it's not so breathless)

    • @wildgophers91
      @wildgophers91 Рік тому +1

      Also you're actually, like ... doing work in this which is great.

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +12

      Thanks! And yeah, I like to actually make/build/fabricate stuff in addition to talking about. Feels more relatable to actually point at a physical artifact rather than just vaguely wave at some CGI or greenscreen animation :)

    • @jeffmcdonald101
      @jeffmcdonald101 Рік тому

      @@BreakingTaps You do a fine job of both sir.

  • @corujario2752
    @corujario2752 11 місяців тому +1

    Seeing someone taking such a project with the level of detail you did is encouraging and impressive. Congratulations.

  • @dienelt5661
    @dienelt5661 Рік тому +8

    This is amazing, exploring specific ways to manufacture complex parts is fascinating. This could be a video series if you have more material for it (although I imagine these would be really long and expensive to make). Still one of my favorite channel to this day, thanks for the top tier content :)

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +2

      I've definitely been thinking about something similar! Would probably need to pick an item that's a bit simpler just so it's more tractable, but it would be really neat to replicate a scale model of and explain the various ways it was done. Aerospace, rockets, etc is probably ideal since a lot of the information is public domain too. Will think it over!

  • @bartekburmistrz8679
    @bartekburmistrz8679 Рік тому +4

    Thank you for this video, I always thought that to make internal cooling channels are impossible to make DIY, but now I see that it have been my mindset that's been wrong, there is always a way

  • @ronjon7942
    @ronjon7942 Рік тому +1

    Subscribed. This is great stuff, and yours is the first Nebula-sponsored video that made me want to finally subscribe to the service. Also, I guess I never really thought electroplating could be a DIY tool, so thanks for that as well - along with a good presentation on applying the lost wax process. That’s another’tool’ I thought was out of the realm of DIY. Nice work, Taps.

  • @grahamking9121
    @grahamking9121 11 місяців тому

    Fascinating! I admire your dedication to seeing this process through, which makes the explanation so much more tangible. Thanks!

  • @CaskStrength777
    @CaskStrength777 Рік тому +6

    I had wondered so much how you did this considering wax is not conductive. Makes total sense, fascinating

  • @quirkyMakes
    @quirkyMakes Рік тому +6

    I love the fact that we basically use the same technology as 50 years ago just more refined and robust. I still think it's the best way although being able to 3d print some parts is really helpful and speeds up manufacturing

    • @bullywa
      @bullywa Рік тому

      there are some problem - rocket nozzle needs tight connection with copper heatsink(metal 3d printing like slm or sls only one material) , any void will cause burnout. It could be done with special techniques of forming.

    • @quentin1362
      @quentin1362 Рік тому

      @@bullywa Fortunately new technologies arrive. It's now possible to print multi-material parts by FAST/SPS or LPBF, maybe not such big parts but in few years for sure.

  • @mp6756
    @mp6756 Рік тому

    A very impressive outcome. I wasn't sure what to expect as I hadn't seen your work prior to this video but I will definitely look for your video's in the future. A very cool project thanks for sharing.

  • @ChrisSmith_NW
    @ChrisSmith_NW 9 місяців тому

    This was awesome!
    I appreciate all the time and effort that went in to this video and the parts.

  • @MachiningandMicrowaves
    @MachiningandMicrowaves Рік тому +7

    Fascinating as always. I feel encouraged to get my electroformed corrugated antenna horn project finished now!

    • @solowri5100
      @solowri5100 Рік тому

      Hmmmm... I have no idea what the heck your talking about or what it means... but I'm intrigued. All I know is 1) I'm bored, 2) I think "corrugated" means wavy 3) I have no equipment and don't know how but I want to electroplate stuff too 4) I'm willing to learn stuff & things & whatnot 5) I like machines and have been known to use one or two on occasion 6) I use microwaves to help make my food taste terrible 7) My questions number just over the "many" designation but that's ok because I can make more 8) I am on occasion a Nigerian prince and would like to add your money to my money so we can both be richly 9) Number eight is a joke. Not like, the actual number eight, (even though it is silly looking and has to get part time work as the infinity symbol) but el numero ocho of this list and last but not least #9: Since you have passed the interview process I am willing to learn anything you would like to teach about whatever the heck it is you were talking about in the comments as well as that forbidden, evil dark arts of the Microwaves.

    • @MachiningandMicrowaves
      @MachiningandMicrowaves Рік тому

      @@solowri5100 The corrugations in an antenna horn are internal grooves which create a high impedance surface. Huge fun

  • @bansci
    @bansci Рік тому +16

    Amazing work, such a beautiful story from images, to explanation, to demonstration. Thank you.

  • @4dirt2racer0
    @4dirt2racer0 Рік тому +1

    dude thank u so much for making this channel, i love your videos so much u cover the coolest stuff, i think the difference is ur genuine passion, it doesnt seem like u just make videos to get views n become a channel to make $$, u were probably going to do everything u did anyway whether youtube n the world or ur friends knew knew or nobody at all ever knew..

  • @elguapo3436
    @elguapo3436 2 місяці тому

    It was worth watching passionately, the process breakdown to the nitty-gritty details is really worth a ton of subscriptions, thank you for sharing. I understand why this has 1.2M+ views. Great content keep it up!

  • @NastyNixels
    @NastyNixels Рік тому +3

    Zachary: This is my first time viewing your channel. Excellent content & well presented. Thanks for your efforts. TIP: If you ever need to do the wax onto copper: Spray the copper with shellac. This will give a thin coat that allows the wax to adhere to it. This was done in the renaissance for metal to leather bonding, so it’s been time-tested fairly well.

    • @cosmicraysshotsintothelight
      @cosmicraysshotsintothelight 8 місяців тому

      He could also laser etch the slots to give them little micro pits for the wax to get a grip onto. Or even glass bead blast. I know it is a small scale replica though. Hey... build a bigger one. Make an actual rocket engine. Way more dangerous than those folks playing with SRB based toy rockets. About 3 times bigger than that one should do it. Seen that old man with the triple pulse motor go-cart? He's crazy!

  • @jbrownson
    @jbrownson Рік тому +5

    Love seeing clips of your CNC. Would love a dedicated episode about it

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +5

      I'll see what I can do! Would love to talk about it more, just not entirely sure how to best show it other than "well here's the CNC!". Maybe during a shop tour or something!

    • @jbrownson
      @jbrownson Рік тому

      @@BreakingTaps I was in the market for a 5 axis machine for my garage and the MedCenter was very much on my short list, saw one in LA at a showroom. Wound up with a Datron C5 which isn’t quite as capable and not much cheaper, but less intimidating and fit better in my space. Starting to consider what the next machine is, Hermles are pretty impressive, but maybe MedCenter would still be worth looking at.

  • @josephpk4878
    @josephpk4878 Рік тому +1

    Human ingenuity is remarkable. This was a great presentation - going to try out that STL on some metallic filament.

  • @dennisthompson6242
    @dennisthompson6242 Рік тому +1

    I worked on these engines at the Rocket Engine Test Facility at NASA Lewis in the 1970s. We were the main facility for producing and testing this type of combustion chamber. I remember quite well the Z alloy and the nickle plating operations. Our chambers had about a 1 inch diameter throat and weighed maybe 50 lbs. They were in the 5,000 to 10,00 lbs thrust range. They each took weeks of electroplating. We tested each one to failure and and had quite a rogues gallery of burnt through engines. I have tried to explain the process to people several times over the years so this video will really help.
    I was often the engine operator, stationed only about 50 feet from the test stand. The room was very heavy reinforced concrete with a thick steel outer shell. We viewed the test stand through a steel periscope that had 40 panes of bullet proof glass at the end! My hand hovered over the abort button but the scientists hated to abort until the engine was destroyed. If a LOX line ruptured it spewed huge flames as the 3000 psi LOX burned the heavy wall 2" stainless steel pipes like a Roman candle.
    here is an overview of the RETF: www1.grc.nasa.gov/historic-facilities/rocket-engine-test-facility/origins-of-the-retf/
    Here is the gang I worked with. The man on the far left with the Dutch boy haircut is George Repas, one of the main inventors of this process: www1.grc.nasa.gov/historic-facilities/rocket-engine-test-facility/retf-staff/

  • @lewismassie
    @lewismassie Рік тому +7

    This was extremely interesting. Though I found the new technique also very interesting. I also happen to be one of they guys who knows far too much about the RS-25.
    So around STS-89 they started flying Block IIA engines with an entirely new combustion chamber design, I would imagine the new combustion chamber design was a part of that.
    Also I had no idea that it came from the J-2X either. Would love to read more about that.

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +1

      Grain of salt regarding the J-2X, I didn't find a specific citation for that but more pieced together chonology of the technique and when it was mentioned. So I might actually have that detail wrong (will pin an addendum comment if someone else knows more about it), or they both inherited the technique from elsewhere. But since J-2X was supposed to be the replacement before they decided to re-use the RS-25, it sorta makes sense they'd steal that bit of R&D and retroactively apply it I think.
      Interesting about Block IIA engines, I'll do some digging! Would indeed be interesting to see what changes they made to the combustion chamber. I think this plating process was a huge expense and bottleneck, so it would make sense if they were trying to streamline or even remove it back then.

  • @Carhill
    @Carhill Рік тому +3

    1:59 - That MCO joke XD

  • @siberx4
    @siberx4 Рік тому

    Incredibly cool technique, and you did an impressive job replicating it at small scale. Fascinating!

  • @confusingdot
    @confusingdot Рік тому

    I'm proud of what you got! Love the process and showing the technique!

  • @thom7440
    @thom7440 Рік тому +4

    One slight correction... the rocket engines made from brazing tubes together didnt have a separate layer for the combustion chamber ... the brazed tubes were in direct contact with the flames .... they WERE the combustion chamber ... Other than that, really good video

  • @Leadvest
    @Leadvest Рік тому +7

    Years ago, I read gelatin thickened electrolysis solutions are used to improve plating evenness, but I never got around to testing it out myself.
    It's really unfortunate that plating with iron/steel are rarely discussed. There's an old adage that electro-winning iron is impossible. I did however find a patent on plating titanium, but even plating onto titanium is considered difficult, and don't get me started on aluminum, and beryllium.

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +6

      I actually made up an iron plating bath a year or two ago! But never really got around to using it and kinda forgot about it. Maybe I'll see if there is a technique/video I could make with it. I recall iron plating having an interesting history, where it was used super extensively and then basically stopped completely once alternate techniques/metals were more common. Could make a fun topic!

  • @Project.Infinity
    @Project.Infinity Рік тому

    Fascinating video! Such a great example of using relatively simple processes to solve highly complex problems. Thanks for sharing!

  • @user-fh2fm7vr4m
    @user-fh2fm7vr4m Рік тому

    Thank you for the nebula plug. I have always had an appeal for Nebula but never really saw an ad to show me what I was missing, but specifically saying hey this video is on Nebula is a great way I think.

  • @abicol6010
    @abicol6010 Рік тому +6

    Why is "the machines used by the Machinist are called machine tools" so funny 😂😂

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +7

      Haha right?! I saw that clip while skimming for something else and just couldn't stop laughing, had to include it 😂

  • @dav1dsm1th
    @dav1dsm1th Рік тому +8

    It would have added another process - but it would be interesting if, after machining off the high spots, you could have applied a resist to the newly machined surfaces - so that the subsequent electro plating would target just the low spots. Not sure how a resist could be applied - but maybe from a negative of the shape that had just been machined. Just throwing random stupid ideas out there 🙂 Very interesting video, as always. Stay safe out there.

  • @jcbsrl
    @jcbsrl 3 місяці тому

    I just stumbled upon this video. Your explanation is so easy to follow. I don’t know much about engineering, but I could follow along very well and you made it interesting.

  • @greenjesus1821
    @greenjesus1821 11 місяців тому

    Loved the video dude, your mannerisms and relaxed way of conveying the information really meshed with me, keep at it 👌

  • @Bakamoichigei
    @Bakamoichigei Рік тому +33

    Brilliant stuff! 👍 At first I thought maybe you were going to talk about investment casting or something, but quickly realized that a cast part would be a godawful nightmare from a QC standpoint... There could be countless internal imperfections in the material which would be _so freakin' bad_ for a rocket engine's combustion chamber! This is my first time seeing this sort of process, and it's a real eye-opener. 🤔 One thing though; I noticed you were having a bit of trouble cutting back the wax to leave just the channels, much less doing so with a nice surface finish. Did you try using heated tools, or solvents? I know when my sister is working on wax masters for jewelry, she works a lot with hot tools for cleaner carving... And she also uses a solvent (denatured alcohol, I think.) to smooth tooling marks out of the surface.

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +11

      Ooh, yeah that would have worked better! I honestly just didn't think about using hot tools or solvents while scraping off the wax. I did heat the whole thing up a few times, helped re-flow the wax and re-stick it to the metal. But didn't think about using hot tools! Will keep that in mind next time I try something like this :)

    • @gilbertcabasse6168
      @gilbertcabasse6168 Рік тому

      @@BreakingTaps But couldn't you use a lathe with some coolant to remove the extra wax? I suppose it should remove tiny chips at a time, so limiting the stress on the wax that should remain, and so reducing the risk to stick it out?

  • @ominguti6345
    @ominguti6345 Рік тому +3

    Great video as always. I hope the diamond electroplating video makes it to youtube at some point. I paid for nebula just to see it. It is a bit disappointing there is no comment section on nebula. I would like to ask some questions about that video. For example, why choose carbide for the electroplating tool blank? Wouldn't nickel stick to steel much better making your tool last a lot longer? I'm guessing you choose carbide for rigidity, but the tool shape shown was a shape I think would work well in steel too. Perhaps you're planning future tools will have much larger stick out and be skinnier and this is just to figure out the process... Well. This video made me interested in the process. I didn't even realise it is doable in a hobby setting. Thank you.

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +1

      Perhaps some day! Especially if I can get pure ductile cutting working. (and cheers for joining Nebula, I hope you get some value out of the other creators too! I'll be trying to put stuff up there in the future as well, including like "director's cut" and longer explanations). Comments on Nebula videos is something of a hot topic internally, there's people for and against so not fully decided yet.
      Otherwise, there's a reddit for Nebula that a lot of folks use to ask questions about videos (www.reddit.com/r/Nebula). I've been keeping an eye on that.
      To your questions! You're correct, I picked carbide mainly for stiffness/rigidity. Truthfully hardened tool steel probably would have been fine, but I was concerned the small size of the tools (0.3-0.4mm) would lead to deflection issues. At that size even a little deflection can cause the tool to snap, particularly in a rigid material like glass.
      It was also something of an exercise in hard-milling carbide and using PCD tools. I've always wanted to but never had a good excuse, this seemed like a good one. 😁 Feels like I have a new tool in the toolbox now, being able to mill shapes in carbide for custom jobs.

  • @eicdesigner
    @eicdesigner Рік тому

    Yet again I stumble across a subject I never even thought about but watched the entire video with rapt attention. Thanks for sharing and know that none of us blames you for trying to avoid the algorithms. Good luck on Nebula!

  • @ilike1sand0s68
    @ilike1sand0s68 Рік тому

    My first video from you. This was actually really good. Thank you!! I really enjoyed this!

  • @justinkane290
    @justinkane290 Рік тому +3

    6000 lb is not a pressure it's a force haha. Amazing process, and great video! Thanks!

  • @ianbottom7396
    @ianbottom7396 Рік тому +60

    Very cool (pun intended 😂)
    It wasn’t too long after I started 3D printing and designing that I realised the potential of learning to electroplate (at least at a hobby level) and so my journey down another rabbit hole began. Apart from the 3D prints I also use the process for organic items such as leaves, insects, rocks, wood etc, it’s such a cool process to see something become plated in metal right in front of you, possibly the closest thing I’ll ever do to Alchemy 😂
    Anyway thanks for the video, I always enjoy your content

    • @Xsiondu
      @Xsiondu Рік тому +2

      Do the insects have a favorite type of metalizing material? Can you give me adamanitium bones like wolverine?

    • @skippityblippity8656
      @skippityblippity8656 Рік тому

      @@Xsiondu
      Since insects have exoskeletons
      Unironically yes

    • @GwynRosaire
      @GwynRosaire 10 місяців тому +2

      Placing gold inside a nuclear reactor to make lead was my alchemy moment.

    • @ianbottom7396
      @ianbottom7396 10 місяців тому

      @@GwynRosaire very cool too but I’d be surprised if you did it at home. Is it true that while it is possible, it’s by far cheaper to buy gold?

    • @cosmicraysshotsintothelight
      @cosmicraysshotsintothelight 8 місяців тому

      @@GwynRosaire It costs more than the natural occurring Lead. heheheheehehehe... You should have tried to make Mercury instead. ;-)

  • @taterkaze9428
    @taterkaze9428 Рік тому

    This is fantastic YT. This kind of content can't be found elsewhere. Well done.

  • @AsymptoteInverse
    @AsymptoteInverse 10 місяців тому +1

    Everything about any working rocket engine is remarkable, but there are so many extra-remarkable things here. I'm particularly impressed by the stones on whoever said "You know what? Let's just electroplate a centimeter of nickel onto the thing. That'll do it."
    I'm also super-impressed that you managed to replicate this at all, let alone on such an adorable scale. Cheers!

  • @SBA_poiko
    @SBA_poiko Рік тому +3

    There's a great Video by Safran (the aerospace firm) about how they use wax to create the complicated turbine geometries. Highly recommend it.

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +3

      Ooh! I think I found it: ua-cam.com/video/1tM96B77n0U/v-deo.html Queing up for a watch this afternoon, cheers for the tip! Looks really interesting

    • @SBA_poiko
      @SBA_poiko Рік тому +1

      @@BreakingTaps yep this is the one

  • @TurbulentSphere
    @TurbulentSphere Рік тому +3

    Excellent video! Do you happen to have a link for the retro NASA "how engines work" clips you used?

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +6

      Thanks! I believe most of those clips were snagged from this video: archive.org/details/SaturnPropulsionSystems1965

    • @TurbulentSphere
      @TurbulentSphere Рік тому +1

      @@BreakingTaps Thanks!

  • @VincentGroenewold
    @VincentGroenewold Рік тому

    Absolutely amazing, I just keep on finding new superlatives for your projects, love it!

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому

      Thanks! This was a fun one to put together 🥰

  • @thomasrussell4674
    @thomasrussell4674 Рік тому

    Proud of you man well done! It's inspiring to see you recreating the core principles of the NASA technique with a very smart low temperature process.

  • @paintballercali
    @paintballercali Рік тому +3

    5hianiw all my favorite topics. Well shot well edited also im jealous of your tools.

  • @RobertLBarnard
    @RobertLBarnard Рік тому +3

    Can nickel be plasma sprayed? I wonder if the bulk of the nickel could be added after the initial electroplating?
    Although I guess the heating up of the substrate could carbonize the wax, and that would be bad.

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +2

      Not sure to be honest! Destin mentioned on twitter that it has been flame sprayed in the past (twitter.com/smartereveryday/status/1644446860067717121) so perhaps? I'm not super familiar with either technique though so unsure what the limitations are.

    • @cogoid
      @cogoid Рік тому

      "Launcher Space" makes their engines by spraying a strong outer jacket on a 3D printed copper structure. They have videos showing the process.

  • @LanceMcCarthy
    @LanceMcCarthy Рік тому

    This was awesome. I love the closeup of the channel edges.

  • @carrickrichards2457
    @carrickrichards2457 Рік тому

    I played with electroplating, lost wax and sand mold casting when 11-12 years old using lead bullets in the sitting room fireplace (Brave parents!) Wish I'd had you channel then. Thanks for sharing this

  • @samuelschuur7044
    @samuelschuur7044 Рік тому +3

    What machine did you use to machine the base copper part? That final "turning" operation looked pretty cool. Overall a very cool project.

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +2

      Thanks! It's a Kitamura Medcenter 5ax

    • @EricBrummer
      @EricBrummer Рік тому +2

      If you're talking about ~10:16 in, that's a endmill in a mill, with an extra axis (4th axis) doing rotation, so achieving similar to a lathe turned part. As to the specific machines he has, I think he's mentioned but I don't recall.

    • @samuelschuur7044
      @samuelschuur7044 Рік тому +2

      @@EricBrummer Yeah that's what I figured - just a neat operation - the axis looks like it's compensating for run out which is very cool.

  • @smash5967
    @smash5967 Рік тому +8

    Still waiting for the static test fire

  • @caluzzucarrazzi5549
    @caluzzucarrazzi5549 10 місяців тому

    This is pretty cool man, thanks for taking the time to produce an awesome vid

  • @Bob4golf1
    @Bob4golf1 7 місяців тому

    Very cool! I'm impressed that you hung in there long enough to get a couple of working pieces. One of the more interesting videos on UA-cam! Well Done!

  • @ericlotze7724
    @ericlotze7724 Рік тому +4

    I thought it was going to be a sand/wax core like water cooled engines, this is WAY cooler.
    (Unintentional Pun lol)

  • @marianaldenhoevel7240
    @marianaldenhoevel7240 Рік тому +4

    Fascinating to watch you reproduce this byzantine process. Thank you very much!
    Have you set a launch date? :-)

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +3

      Hehehe, think I have a few more components to work on first 😁

  • @jlawless4525
    @jlawless4525 Рік тому

    Dear sir,
    This fantastic and informative feature is of the highest service. Your explanations are so plain and clear. I was spellbound, which I've been almost never. You're a great and kind man. Many thanks for sharing

  • @benji376
    @benji376 Рік тому

    Wow. It looks amazing. Thanks for the demonstration

  • @Hailfire08
    @Hailfire08 Рік тому +3

    lbs or even lbs-force isn't a pressure though, do you mean psi?

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +2

      🙉
      (it was probably PSI, snagged the number from some rocketdyne whitepaper)

    • @Hailfire08
      @Hailfire08 Рік тому +1

      ​​@@BreakingTapsif you calculate the chamber pressure as thrust (~500k lb-force) divided by nozzle neck area (10in diameter) you get 6,400psi, so your number indeed seems to be psi

  • @mattymerr701
    @mattymerr701 Рік тому +4

    Least you didnt say the pressure was the equivelent to 6 million bald eagles flapping or something

  • @NJHENDO
    @NJHENDO 7 місяців тому

    Just found your channel-watched this video and immediately subscribed. WOW. So eager to go through the rest of your content/future videos. Thank you for the level of detail/time you dedicate to this!

  • @timmer9lives
    @timmer9lives 11 місяців тому

    Brilliant. I really enjoyed your presentation. I’m into hobby machining and I was totally intrigued. SUBSCRIBED.

  • @MattyEngland
    @MattyEngland Рік тому +6

    They had LSD and the blessing of the freemasons.

  • @morkovija
    @morkovija Рік тому

    Top-shelf quality of content. Thank you

  • @makingtolearn
    @makingtolearn Рік тому

    Super cool video! What an interesting process. I did some hot isostatic pressing on cast Titanium parts around 30 years ago and now do it on Platinum castings for jewelry I make. In jewelry making we sometimes do co-casting where we add wax to a finished Platinum casting and then investment cast gold into the wax area. We typically have to add in a mechanical bond line as well.

  • @ilkerozin
    @ilkerozin 6 місяців тому

    Wow, this video is an absolute gem! Thank you so much for taking the time to create such a detailed and enlightening explanation of the process.

  • @davem3789
    @davem3789 Рік тому

    13:42 awesome description about manufacturing and learning new techniques! Great video.

  • @Venom.427
    @Venom.427 Рік тому

    Thanks for all the effort in the video excellent quality

  • @mercerconsulting9728
    @mercerconsulting9728 7 місяців тому

    Fascinating video, and the first time I finally understand how they build these. Thanks very much for posting.

  • @theoneandonlydiggit
    @theoneandonlydiggit Рік тому

    i subscribe. because of your passion for science. you deserve the following. very well done/made everything here boss. keep up the great work you do.

  • @sccolbert
    @sccolbert Рік тому

    Well dang. It's a rare day that I come across a new-to-me manufacturing process. Thanks so much!

  • @jonlowrey
    @jonlowrey Рік тому +1

    I got the chance to help as a chamber wax/de-waxer and you are right about the manual labor involved. Plus always a chance not all the wax got baked out of the channels after plating causing FOD issues. 3D printing is awesome but not always (at least for now) cost effective. Great video and spot on. Can't wait for the next.

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +1

      Oh super cool! I bet that was so frustrating, after all the work for the wax to not get fully removed. And probably expensive too, ugh. 😢
      And yeah, I even looked into what it would cost to 3D print these little models and it was wildly expensive. Can't imagine what it would cost for a full scale model, that also has to withstand all the rigors of a hot fire.

  • @LtJerryRigg
    @LtJerryRigg Рік тому

    What a fantastic technique. Clever engineering study, thank you!

  • @felixman9691
    @felixman9691 Рік тому

    Great video and I love your attitude about learning stuff, I get up in the morning to live with my remaining family and learn more cool stuff!!

  • @nighttrain1565
    @nighttrain1565 Рік тому

    This was absolutely fantastic. Great work!!

  • @mndlessdrwer
    @mndlessdrwer Рік тому +2

    It's really fascinating how they managed to figure that out. I probably would have gone the route of just buffing on some finely powdered silver so I could leave the wax as machinable as possible, then just dip the whole thing in the wax until a coating the depth of the grooves had been deposited before scraping off the mounting flange, chucking it into the mill and machining the surfaces flush to eliminate excess wax. It is supposed to be a machinable wax, after all. Purging the majority of the wax out through heating is definitely a good idea, as it allows you to have a much larger surface area to dissolve the wax out chemically afterward.

  • @overvoltagestudio
    @overvoltagestudio Рік тому +1

    Your equipment is like, really REALLY impressive! I’ve never seen any personal UA-cam channel with this calibre of machinery

    • @BreakingTaps
      @BreakingTaps  Рік тому +2

      Thanks! To be fair, its main use is outside of youtube for jobshop/prototype manufacturing stuff. But it does make for a great toy to use for videos!

  • @davida1hiwaaynet
    @davida1hiwaaynet Рік тому

    Fascinating to see this! Thanks for sharing. Rocketry fascinates me.

  • @olenilsen4660
    @olenilsen4660 10 місяців тому

    I love it! Thanks for making this, I can´t imagine the hours you spent on it, but it was really interesting. Already hit subscribe, please keep doing this kind of videos :)

  • @oldmanspooky6641
    @oldmanspooky6641 Рік тому +1

    Just found this channel!!!
    I’m hooked.

  • @wantafastz28
    @wantafastz28 Рік тому

    Keep up the good work, your content is very enjoyable.

  • @12around1
    @12around1 7 місяців тому

    your meticulous work is quite inspiring. very well done!

  • @eliolmstead6219
    @eliolmstead6219 11 місяців тому

    Definitely should make more and sell them if you have the time and resources! Amazing desk decoration for an Aerospace Engineering student!

  • @HesTNTonPMS
    @HesTNTonPMS Рік тому

    I am absolutely in love with the RS-25's
    No matter what!
    That Rocket motor under fire is so impressive to see, I can watch test firings of RS 25's without tiring

  • @curedham2963
    @curedham2963 Рік тому

    This has to be one of the coolest videos on youtube, i wondered for a really long time how they did this but not questioned it thinking it was some sort of secret.

  • @joejoejoejoejoejoe4391
    @joejoejoejoejoejoe4391 Рік тому

    I can remember an article in an aero modelling magazine (1980s) about electroplating wax formers, they used wires inside the wax, and mixed graphite in the wax to make it conductive.
    I wonder if you could have done something similar by filling the channels with sand, and casting the outer shell onto the inner core.