Will AI replace animators?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 вер 2024
- Neural networks that can create original videos already exist. And although they are not yet able to replace cinematographers or animators completely, they are already making progress in this direction. Will Artificial Intelligence ever be able to replace animators? And are you able to tell which picture was painted by a living person, and which by artificial intelligence?
#ArtificialIntelligence #AI #NeuralNetworks
Sumsub - empowering compliance and anti-fraud teams to fight money laundering, terrorist financing, and online fraud.
More about us:
sumsub.com
/ sumsubcom
/ sumsubcom
/ admin
my respect for miyazaki after watching this video : 📈📈📈📈
I think Miyazaki's right on the money with this one.
He’s right, you know. It is an insult to life itself…
You people are insane
Life sucks, so who cares?
@@ThanosDestroyeryearsagome😢
"It turned out pretty well, right?" No lmfao it looks like ass
For now,you guys forget how long it takes a human to learn that skill vs a machine
@@randomness4989 the thing is AI fundamentally can't understand how animation works. When you give it an objective it does it in the most boring and efficient way possible which invariably makes it look like ass. AI is a computer, it will NEVER be able to think organically. It has no artistic ability or intent, it just does what you tell it to as fast as possible. AI can't self correct because it thinks that what it's doing is perfectly fine. If a human animator makes a bad animation and someone says "fix it", the animator will look over their animation and identify things they could have improved or done Better and fix it. But an AI will just error 404 because to it, what it did was perfect because it did exactly as it was told right down to the letter
@@randomness4989 just like how AI will never understand or feel emotions, AI will never understand creativity or be able to replicate it
@@randomness4989 sure, maybe the laymen will go "wow technology cool" but for anyone with an IQ above 100 it'll look like ass
@@randomness4989 yep
Is anyone going to talk about concept art. Everyone is like 'ai will replace artists!1!!!1!!' but ai can't create a concept. they can't. they can make a pretty picture but if you asked it to draw a certain thing, i promise you almost none of the character/enviornment design would take little details in mind for the concept design that makes things jus that much better. I'm bad at explaining but someone here gets my point, right?
Yes ai is just too dumb to get what you certanly want. It's like drawing something without idea in my opinion ai don't need to be banned but it would faster age like milk.
Can’t create a concept… yet
@@mincingwords2812Can’t create a concept… ever
@@lamolol5167 you sure about that?! Cause I'm a little too dumb to understand
you gotta be kidding me :D AI is being used for connect art since the beginning. I think that's the 1st thing AI replaced. :D
AI art should be banned for crimes against humanity
sometimes it really feels like
I guess in that case cars should be replaced for crimes against horse carriages??
@@mxs4193 I guess in that case horse carriages should be banned for crimes against human feet?
@@lunarcat3283 didn’t say they were great. They should be replaced by some better alternative when possible. But they helped the world progress a lot and that’s more important.
@@gusfring6887st banned for fucking stealing a horse carriage is not relatable to thw subject you fool in addition ai is much much more dangerous literally nuke levek threat
Hand drawn is the best. I don't wanna see the day when a soulless machine animates everything.
Recently, I've been told to give up drawing as a failure of an artist, because "We are all going to rely on AI 100% in the future" as I was told.
Do what you want and learn to use those "AI" software. It's a tool, like computers are.
I'm here to tell you to fight the system. AI may be able to pump out high-quality eye-candy but they lack the human expression that makes art feel truly evocative and meaningful. I think that people who don't actually make art and can only view art through a lense of what can make more and fast money don't get art anyway. Price tags determine value in their eyes, and art just can't and shouldn't be limited to that
It's probably more reliable to pursue art as a hobby rather than a job. Even before AI, artists have had a hard time finding jobs, and are treated like shit in most industries anyway.
AI bros are just desgustings pieces of flesh, who would say such cruel thing to a beginner artist, if it's something you like, pursue it, art is not only a beautiful image in a screen, art is an extension of the artist themself, and this is smt that AI can't stole from us, our Pathos is human
Why the f did they show hayao miyazaki zombie creatures in the first place? The guy is literally the embodiment of life is an art. They would get a much better response if they showed it to Junji Ito or smtg
lol they showed a dead zombie to someone who believes that life is an art
Ai art defeats the purpose of human creativity. Ai should only be used for not creative works.
I am quite stress out if we get replace. I just started 3d stuffs and I am worried.
Hmm same sis. I was gonna start learning 3d animation. But then this thought struck my mind. Idk what to do
Same I'm almost done with my first project and it kind of upsets me that this technology is now available.
@@jjDub331 all we can do is switch to another career by the secondary trait/skill we have
I am a 3D artist. I think we have to f what we're passionate about and start to learn selling and manipulating people to take money if you wanna survive. Those are the things that AI cannot replace.
You won't get replaced, people that know how to make art can use ai much more effectively which shows the importance of intent behind creating something. Even assuming ai gets good enough to not have artifacts there is still much you can offer that someone no knowledge can't
Ai copies from human art present in the internet and makes beginner artist feel disheartened i feel like ai should not be brought to art
AI animation currently sucks, which is a god thing for animators.
Bro the ai art in the beginning is impossible to think it was made by a artist specially a famous one cause people know how to draw silhouettes instead of vaguely human shaped blobs
I have earned the right to not follow trends.
Based Miyazaki
AI is like letting my 5 year old nephew go nuts on drawing paper.
This is cool but not life changing.
Aı is probably gonna be a tool for artists, if you cant beat them, join to them
Its not a tool tho
@@eliescobis9922what is it then.
I happen to use AI to get inspiration for my art or to portray a character that only exists in my head. With adequate inspiration and reference images, I can translate what I like from what an AI has made to a full piece. It’s been a nice tool, but I don’t think an AI can fully replace artists in the world. People notice the organic imperfections in a piece unconsciously, and anything that is deemed “too perfect” is strange and foreign. The imperfections make art art, and I have yet to be proven otherwise.
My prediction is that one day humanty will face palm themself. "We finally figured the ai out, the best way to communicate visally is fucking drawing."
I don't think promt to image will ever get to this point. Language is too vague and complex. And ai just dosen't have a system to modell what things are and how they function. Nor have the inelligence to fill the gap with artistic execution.
But image to image could be a game changer for drawn animation.
If you can just draw a basic shape, and do a keyframe animation and get a 60fps video with whatever handdrawn style you want, every artists will turns into a stuido by themself. Handrawn animation could be as flexible as vector and 3d animation in the future.
If ai continues to develop purely prompt based I can see people being able to create anything they want with it. Imagine pages of text describing every detail, editing the text and seeing the image update in real time
@@group555_our imagination could build hotels on the moon and beyond after seeing the firs moon landing. I have been following the art scene and the ai scene for 7 years. To me that is the idea of the magic mirror. And i don't belive the current ai concept could deliver that. But it can definitely could render finished paintings from drafts or used for speciel effects. Or for increasing frame rates and resolution. Actually it have been doing it for years and getting better and better at it.
While tha language models haven't improved much.
(This argument does not take into account the ethics of dataset collection.)
The whole point of art is not dedication to the craft for the craft's sake, but to make things that can make people's lives a bit better. AI can be, if nothing else, a good way to brainstorm and quickly get ideas down on paper.
And some people seem to be under the impression that making something using AI means just typing in a prompt of "uh make good movie or something" and presenting whatever the machine produces as though you worked so hard to make it.
Instead, I picture some little boy getting an idea for his own cartoon, going up to his room, having an art generator produce a few rough concepts for him to choose from and further refine. Then he puts the finished concepts for the characters into some animation software to give them different poses and movements.
He uses ChatGPT, not to just write the story for him, but to resolve the plot, brainstorm ideas, and show him ways that he could further refine it.
And even if it was just as easy as entering a prompt describing the video, if the end result is still a good video, where is the problem?
What? Did you think that the value in art was not from the art itself and people's enjoyment of it, but from the bragging rights of the person who made it?
It just makes me a bit sick that we have a technology that allows people to freely explore creative expression, and the "real artists" are shouting them down and insisting that the method that they have trained to do things is the only method to make anything that people should enjoy as "real art".
AI is already replacing most things
Yes
Not yet
Can the artist really be considered famous if I have to guess which one is created by him?
Forget being famous just do want you love.
@@Rasupubegasu absolutely!
I could see why they wouldn't wanna turn to AI. It's just not the same. Plus if AI replaces everybody then...😅
We get that dystopian future from movies and books, where no one does anything all day.
I could tell what painting was IA lol at first glance
I think replacement actually depends on how ppl are going to accept it. Like when it comes to an art created by human there's creativity, emotions and sentiments which AI will never be able to replicate. But if AI is used abundantly then arts by AI are going to be the cheaper alternatives to real arts produced by real humans cuz minimal effort is given here to generate the art. So it totally depends on how ppl receive it. If u r going to look for a cheaper alternative AI it is; just like how plastic is cheaper than steels and woods and ppl accept plastic without any hesitation in spite of it being harmful for the whole ecological system.
Did the automobile replace the horse?
Maybe not Today,, But as What always had Occurs,, They will perfect the Technology maybe 10-30years,, we dont know since ai Artist is new
Is it capable of replacing human artists? Of course...should we encourage that? Of course not, but it is already too late
The movie "TRON" from 1982 was disqualified from receiving an Academy Award nomination for special effects, because the Academy felt using computers was "cheating".
20 years from now, people will laugh about AI being bad for artists in much the same way. My problem with drawing is... time. A small drawing I make can take a month drawing by hand 8 hrs a day to get loads of detail. AI could be the tool I need to be able to get what my brain wants to create in a fraction of that time.
@kisamehoshigaki1492 If AI is using other people's works and just changing it, I agree, it is basically just stealing.
I'm planning on making a card series and using AI just to get the body positions of a character and then I'd hand draw the image while adding the clothes, hair, etc. (not tracing or copy and pasting anything).
I've taught art to kids and told them to place the image to the side and try their best to copy what they see, but never trace. Like using the grid technique, for example. They seem way more excited knowing THEY drew it rather than using AI to create it.
It's like how schools tried to ban the calculator then the internet
I got the first answer right tho 👀
AI may demand equality 😂
Myizaki and ted kaczynski are right
GRASS THAT IS LIFE!
It’s easy if you examine the paintings
The only art involved in ai art is the code that a human soul configured
Ai will help artists not replace them, it's a tool like CGI is for visual effects. People saying here that ai arts should be banned are delusional, this is like saying computers should be banned because you don't do the calculs yourself.
Yes
No
"the future is now old man"
Lawsuits
Victor and mordecai are the best characters
It's already happening
Let go creativity, if we all get replaced, and be jobless, and have no money, who da fak would buy your product.
Replace your employee = your sales go down, and you got another failed company.
Hopefully we can advance Ai art further so we can use this to our advantage. But right now it sucks but there are people working really hard developing to improve this kind of technology, I have hope this will improve.
Inevitable that much of the artwork will be replaced by Ai… hopefully we actual people can hang onto the writing and direction. If it isn’t any good, people have other things to do with their time.
No way
It’s only a matter time. Ai will replaced everyone not just artist. I hope everyone is doing well, its sad.
A lot of these comments are just trash. Sad times when “artists” gatekeep the ability to bring something into reality only if it’s done by conventional means. The stigma around AI art/artists is unnecessary and those who bash others for simply enjoying something are disgusting. Your art must be awful if you think that AI is a threat to creativity.
gatekeep? no. you have drawing, painting, sculpting, photography, filmmaking, makeup, knitting, crochet, collaging, photoshop, a hundred different ways and tools to make visual art. none of them replace art, they are just another method of creating it.
you can do any of them at any skill level and learn and improve over time. others will inspire you and you’ll inspire them.
ai teaches you nothing. it can be used as a tool, sometimes you can get a good composition or colour palette. but most of the time it’s just replicating someone else’s are. you aren’t making art, a machine is copying someone else’s. it’s not gatekeeping who can make art if you’re not even making it.
Ai would tripple animation speed and no one would have to wait years for a movie or a week for one episode on an anime lol.
No
Never
Lol its not art, most artists aren't even artists. True art isn't monetized
That’s bullshit because most famous paintings are monetised. Also, people who design concepts, model and animate is art. A lot of thumbnails, websites design, films, games and other creative media, is literally art.
It takes hours to make them and even weeks or months
It’s art for sure, it’s just not art of the people who generated it.
Miyazaki has money and slaves to animate for him.
The ai looks better
No, it doesn't
eeeeeeehhhhhh
Cry about it hahahaha
Crab in a bucket
Said mf that still play with train toy
not yet
Close
It's not happening
@@AngelPikachuKing yes it is
@@oess855 no it ain't and AI work cannot even be copyrighted
@@AngelPikachuKing yes it will and that doesn't matter. Go cry about it some more
2nd
hope ai artists will be accepted soon enough. artists just be going trough the stages of grief rn. its not like they cant use AI either
Bro you’re not an artist for throwing a few prompts into a software, a software that you didn’t spend years perfecting and mastering. And what’s the point in being an “artist” if all “your” work is churned out by a line of code.
@@sirargz_ the AI literally only does 1 thing. everything else is human work
@@email7919 Yeah that ONE thing is create the art something an ARTIST is supposed to do, there’s no way you’re serious rn.
but ai plagiarizes thousands of work and makes a completely new thing that is unrecognisable from the originals, right?
@@boobooman9365 denoising doesnt need anyone's artwork
Yeahhh time to unsub from sumsub
it's time to say goodbye! Stay safe in the online jungle
Lmfao because?
You guys can use AI to bring Bradley and Emily back
No