Shia didn’t defame abu hurayra everyone who knows know he was a fraud many of his Hadiths come from his Jewish teacher this is why significant part of Suni tradition has nothing to do with Islam Shia also have a similar problem these two schools deviated from the Quran.
Like what do people not bloody understand about the night journey? Were Arabs stupid? No, they were intelligent people with one of the most advanced forms of spoken languages. So when Prophet Muhammad SAW told people about the night journey then why didn't Abu Jahal just say "Cool story! I go to the moon every night in my dream as well". But he ran to Abu Bakr As Siddiq to tell him how his friend (Prophet SAW) was making crazy claims. What was crazy about claiming that he went to the skies in spirit? NO! the crazy part was that Prophet SAW said he did it physically. Case closed!
Who says Sahaba don't have to say who he heard it from!?! Who made that rule? Weren't there hypocrites in the time if the Prophet who others didn't know about them? Doesn't the Qur'an say that among the Sahaba are those who listened to the hypocrites? It's this lack of criticism and the worship (over reverence) of our madhabs and previous scholars that has corrupted this religion.
If they were hypocrites, then they weren't Sahabah. Also, with time the hypocrites revealed themselves. This is a methodological issue and not one of blind madh-hab following.
We Being a true muslims we have nothing to do with these controversial Hadees .... And in true Scense Islam has nothing to do with Hadees ... If we are mixing these hadees with the words of Allaha than we are making Two ..Elah..( Allaha ) that's shirk .... And your Bookhari created a beautyful film on ..mehraj... And Abu Hurera created a fuzz in Islam by narrating thousand of hadees with in a short period of time which have tarnished the Islam and Prophit s prophecy... And our clerics still defend these hadees good for nothing ....
2:18 is this really his science of his Hadiths, if she wasn't there oh she must have heard it from someone! Maybe from this or that but she not going to say. So you will just jump to conclusions.
My guess is Ma'arej' (معارج) the Prophet SAW, travels physically , where the Quran describes how angels use them for long distance travel now scientists call wormholes. (Surah Al Maarij 70:3-4). Further in Surah Al Hijr 15:14-15, If He opens for those nonbelievers a door in heaven ( wormhole ) and lets them continue passing through it to those distant structures, they would not believe that they really got there by simply walking few steps. Instead they would think that they are just optical illusions. The wormhole meaning the bending of fabric space and time like in Quran said in Al Anbiya 21:104. So our universe is only the first Heavan, as Scientist now believe we had multi-verse thus perhap there are 6 more universes. Allahwalam, just a theory no harm done .
Mohammad Rashid Mokhtar - The verse you are referring relates (A. SwT knows best) to the Big Crunch and Big Bounce ("Nu'eeduh" in the ayah means both 'repeat' and 'return to', therefore, may mean both or either). I do not defer with the earlier part of your comment, but I don't find a reason that the verse refer to Worm Hole.
This is the dumbest thing I heard. If Abu Huraira said `I heard this from the Prophet (S.A.W)` & didn't heard directly then he is clearly skipping narrators from the chain. And a hadith is seriously weak if there are actual gaps in the transmission. Unquestionably, Islamic scholarship has done more harm to Islam than its followers.
@@Hakim-it8fn I am not a preacher! I am just a curious soul! Curiosity was bestowed by Allah SWT on humanity. I don't follow I am not a Cattle who follow falsehood because it's widely accepted. As Allah SWT said: 'They have hearts they do not understand with, eyes they do not see with, and ears they do not hear with. They are like cattle. In fact, they are even less guided! Such ˹people˺ are ˹entirely˺ heedless.'.
@@Hakim-it8fn I put up facts you're the person who is trolling here! Hadith is considered weak if narrators are skipped... And Abu Huraira was condemned by Umar as he was accumulating wealth by false narrations.
@@toinfinityandbeyond519 I'm responding to your blanket universal statement: "Unquestionably, Islamic scholarship has done more harm to Islam than its followers." So according to your verdict, 1400 years of scholarship has failed, but you have it all figured out? Because you're "a curious soul"? What exceptional credentials!
Abu Huraira’s narrations WITHOUT repetition are around 1400 (according to the research of Dr. `Abduh Yamani and Diya’-ul-Deen al-A`zami) not 5000 as some claim. Not all of these 1400 narrations are authentic which reduces the amount of his narrations even more.
@@love1234458 well they were in existence before they were graded authentic by the great Imams. So the Great Imams graded them, especially those who had access to the narrators.
traditional scholars say it was physical, and not a dream, however, there can be a third option. it could have been his soul, and not his body that traveled. doesn't mean it was though. just a possibility. AllahuAlim
@1:35-1:45 is a perfect reason all these "Hadith" don't fit with this deen... you guys believe these "Hadith" have been preserved like this Quran now you're equating to Allahs book...you depend on these Hadith AFTER Allah has repeatedly mentioned its HE who teaches, HE who clarifies....if you TRULY TRULY read the Quran, these Hadith dont fit...it totally destroyed how we believe in Allah, how we are supposed to live our everyday lives according to the Quran ....according to the Quran (25:30) And the Messenger has said, "O my Lord, indeed my people have taken this Qur'an as [a thing] abandoned." read the entire Quran NOWHERE will you find anything to follow Hadith...for MANY a times through the Quran Allah keeps asking what other HADITH will you believe in....when and only when the prophet is with you you follow him, but he's not here so the Quran is what he taught...there are 3 versions of his farewell sermon....one says "I have left behind the Quran and my sunnah" the other " I have left behind the Quran and Ahl bayt" the other "I have left behind the Quran"....if you ask well "how would we know how to pray, hajj etc", it shows absence in your belief in Allah...
Mr. Hamza, as a scholar of religion that you are claiming to be, would shed light on accepting testimony of a single woman where Quran says 1 man or 2 women? Secondly, reporting systematic hadieth from likes of Abu Hurayra by 1000 but very few from Ali ibn Abu Talib, would you say? Thanks Wa salaam
It's not always 2:1 testimony . It applies only in financial matters . When in comes to women's matters like pregnancy , breast feeding , the woman's testimony has more weightage . In all other matters it's 1:1
@@sabiak4506 in pregnancy women?! Very well. Then why umar killed a woman during his rien and because her her husband reported her of certain act and umar sentenced her to death since she had given birth to a child after 6 months marriage. Premature birth of children are nothing new so why umar killed her? If you say what you said. Unless you acknowledge that the whole sunni school is based on fabrication
Even if the narrator is Abu Hurayra, not naming the source of the narrations as Abu Hurayra did a lot is a break in the chain. The Sahaba should be held to the same standard as everyone else when it comes to hadith criticism. We shouldn't just assume things when it comes to doctorines of God.
Anthony the Sahaba are all right and are not going to hell! the prophet said according to a hadith that the companions are like the stars, if you follow any of them you shall be guided! You and I are nothing like the Sahaba!
So basically, if a Sahabi said it, then it doesn't need a chain or proof! What's funny is that you mock the Shia in believing in the infallibility of our Prophet (sawa) and Imams (as), and yet you treat the Sahabi, many of whom were highly questionable as infallible! Abu Huraira was nothing more than a hadith-generating machine... or a fabricator (linguistically correct) of hadith.
We don't treat sahabis (ra) as infallible.. Just as we don't treat Ali (ra) as infallible unlike you shias. They were average human beings guided by Islam. But prone to making mistakes. Without Islam, they would be nothing. Just as Ali is nothing without Islam. Without Islam, there would be no difference between Ali and abu jahl.. It's Islam that made Ali one of the greatest just as omar is one of the greatest because of Islam. Being cousin of Allah's Messenger (PBUH) wouldn't save Ali if he didn't accept Islam just as it didn't save abu lahab who was the uncle of the prophet because of abu lahab's defiance and mockery. Prophet (PBUH) is the only Person infallible.. But sahabis were not.. They made mistakes. They had their differences in opinions. They fought each other due to misunderstanding that was incited by some hypocrites. But at the end of the day, they are the best of mankind after all the Prophets (PBUH). Abu bakr, omar, uthman, Ali. May Allah give them the highest of honour in paradise.. We don't dare to disrespect any of them because they are far far superior to us commoners and they made unfathomable sacrifices for Allah and His Messenger.. We don't dare to point out their little mistakes..
Logical interesting you have bluntly stated that the Quran doesnt say rejecting a mutawatir hadith is kufr. but where in the Quran does it say that the hadith is a viable source of narrations
( في أصحابي 12 منافقاً ) There are 12 hypocrites among My (SAW) companions. صحيح مسلم - صفات المنافقين وأحكامهم - باب - رقم الحديث : ( 4983 ) - حدثنا : أبوبكر بن أبي شيبة ، حدثنا : أسود بن عامر ، حدثنا : شعبة بن الحجاج ، عن قتادة ، عن أبي نضرة ، عن قيس قال : قلت لعمار أرأيتم صنيعكم هذا الذي صنعتم في أمر علي أرأيا رأيتموه أو شيئاً عهده إليكم رسول الله (ص) فقال : ما عهد إلينا رسول الله (ص) شيئاً لم يعهده إلى الناس كافة ولكن حذيفة أخبرني : ، عن النبي (ص) قال : قال النبي (ص) في أصحابي إثنا عشر منافقاً فيهم ثمانية لا يدخلون الجنة حتى يلج الجمل في سم الخياط ثمانية منهم تكفيكهم الدبيلة ، وأربعة لم أحفظ ما قال شعبة فيهم. Omar beating Abu Hurairah for amassing wealth by false narration of ahadith ابن عبد ربه الأندلسي - العقد الفريد - كتاب اللؤلؤة في السلطان ما يأخذ به السلطان من الحزم والعزم - عمرو أبو موسى الأشعري وأبو هريرة والحارث الجزء : ( 1 ) - رقم الصفحة : ( 44 ) - .... ثم دعا أبا هريرة ، فقال له : هل علمت من حين أني استعملتك على البحرين وأنت بلا نعلين ، ثم بلغني أنك ابتعت أفراسا بألف دينار وستمائة دينار ، قال : كانت لنا أفراس تناتجت ، وعطايا تلاحقت ، قال : قد حسبت لك رزقك ومؤونتك وهذا فضل فأده ، قال : ليس لك ذلك ، قال : بلى والله وأوجع ظهرك ، ثم قام إليه بالدرة فضربه حتى أدماه ، ثم قال : إيت بها ، قال : احتسبتها عند الله.
Shia didn’t defame abu hurayra everyone who knows know he was a fraud many of his Hadiths come from his Jewish teacher this is why significant part of Suni tradition has nothing to do with Islam Shia also have a similar problem these two schools deviated from the Quran.
where can we get the full lecture ? Seems very interesting ~
Other scholars have spoken or written on the topic.
Like what do people not bloody understand about the night journey? Were Arabs stupid? No, they were intelligent people with one of the most advanced forms of spoken languages. So when Prophet Muhammad SAW told people about the night journey then why didn't Abu Jahal just say "Cool story! I go to the moon every night in my dream as well". But he ran to Abu Bakr As Siddiq to tell him how his friend (Prophet SAW) was making crazy claims. What was crazy about claiming that he went to the skies in spirit? NO! the crazy part was that Prophet SAW said he did it physically.
Case closed!
Brother, salaam. Please change the title of the video. Most of it is on the Mi'raj; not Abu Huraira.
Thank you.
Who says Sahaba don't have to say who he heard it from!?! Who made that rule? Weren't there hypocrites in the time if the Prophet who others didn't know about them? Doesn't the Qur'an say that among the Sahaba are those who listened to the hypocrites? It's this lack of criticism and the worship (over reverence) of our madhabs and previous scholars that has corrupted this religion.
If they were hypocrites, then they weren't Sahabah.
Also, with time the hypocrites revealed themselves.
This is a methodological issue and not one of blind madh-hab following.
@AutoDriver4000
Hypocrites aren't sahabah mate.
@AutoDriver4000
No. You're a fool for putting words in my mouth and false paradigms.
@AutoDriver4000
Liar you are.
Well calm down if shaykh says, then its true, why would he lie?
We Being a true muslims we have nothing to do with these controversial Hadees .... And in true Scense Islam has nothing to do with Hadees ... If we are mixing these hadees with the words of Allaha than we are making Two ..Elah..( Allaha ) that's shirk .... And your Bookhari created a beautyful film on ..mehraj... And Abu Hurera created a fuzz in Islam by narrating thousand of hadees with in a short period of time which have tarnished the Islam and Prophit s prophecy... And our clerics still defend these hadees good for nothing ....
Bro you cut the video off right when it was super interesting. Where is the rest? :(
Zarif Atai where can I get the full lecture
Look up night journey hamza Yusuf
The Quran is the word of Allah. The Hadith is the word of man. What are we told to follow by Allah? It’s really that simple.
2:18 is this really his science of his Hadiths, if she wasn't there oh she must have heard it from someone! Maybe from this or that but she not going to say. So you will just jump to conclusions.
My guess is Ma'arej' (معارج) the Prophet SAW, travels physically , where the Quran describes how angels use them for long distance travel now scientists call wormholes. (Surah Al Maarij 70:3-4). Further in Surah Al Hijr 15:14-15, If He opens for those nonbelievers a door in heaven ( wormhole ) and lets them continue passing through it to those distant structures, they would not believe that they really got there by simply walking few steps. Instead they would think that they are just optical illusions. The wormhole meaning the bending of fabric space and time like in Quran said in Al Anbiya 21:104. So our universe is only the first Heavan, as Scientist now believe we had multi-verse thus perhap there are 6 more universes. Allahwalam, just a theory no harm done .
Mohammad Rashid Mokhtar - The verse you are referring relates (A. SwT knows best) to the Big Crunch and Big Bounce ("Nu'eeduh" in the ayah means both 'repeat' and 'return to', therefore, may mean both or either).
I do not defer with the earlier part of your comment, but I don't find a reason that the verse refer to Worm Hole.
This is the dumbest thing I heard. If Abu Huraira said `I heard this from the Prophet (S.A.W)` & didn't heard directly then he is clearly skipping narrators from the chain. And a hadith is seriously weak if there are actual gaps in the transmission. Unquestionably, Islamic scholarship has done more harm to Islam than its followers.
Indeed! so-called Islamic Scholars have harm & defamed Islam.
@@toinfinityandbeyond519 But you have it all figured out!? Where do folks sign up to learn from you... "Internet Troll Seminary"??
@@Hakim-it8fn I am not a preacher! I am just a curious soul! Curiosity was bestowed by Allah SWT on humanity. I don't follow I am not a Cattle who follow falsehood because it's widely accepted. As Allah SWT said: 'They have hearts they do not understand with, eyes they do not see with, and ears they do not hear with. They are like cattle. In fact, they are even less guided! Such ˹people˺ are ˹entirely˺ heedless.'.
@@Hakim-it8fn I put up facts you're the person who is trolling here! Hadith is considered weak if narrators are skipped... And Abu Huraira was condemned by Umar as he was accumulating wealth by false narrations.
@@toinfinityandbeyond519 I'm responding to your blanket universal statement: "Unquestionably, Islamic scholarship has done more harm to Islam than its followers." So according to your verdict, 1400 years of scholarship has failed, but you have it all figured out? Because you're "a curious soul"? What exceptional credentials!
Abu Huraira’s narrations WITHOUT repetition are around 1400 (according to the
research of Dr. `Abduh Yamani and Diya’-ul-Deen al-A`zami) not 5000 as some claim. Not all of these 1400 narrations are authentic which reduces the amount of his narrations even more.
Exactly. The number of sound narrations are around 400
The question is who decided to call it authentic? 😁
@@love1234458 Experts of Hadith.
@@AbuMuslimKhorasani i mean when these hadiths were written . compiled for the first time .
@@love1234458 well they were in existence before they were graded authentic by the great Imams. So the Great Imams graded them, especially those who had access to the narrators.
Do you guys believe this was a Dream or something that happened in Reality?
traditional scholars say it was physical, and not a dream, however, there can be a third option. it could have been his soul, and not his body that traveled. doesn't mean it was though. just a possibility. AllahuAlim
s.a.w.
I definitely don't think it was a dream though.
@@principlemethods5281 but don’t you find odd that Bursa is not mentioned before, or that Allah asked for 50 prayers, only for Moses to intervene?
You ever thought he just made it up? I think that is far more convincing arguement
Did Abu huraria lived with Rasool AllAh saw 33 years? Or 32 months just? You guys are jerks
@1:35-1:45 is a perfect reason all these "Hadith" don't fit with this deen... you guys believe these "Hadith" have been preserved like this Quran now you're equating to Allahs book...you depend on these Hadith AFTER Allah has repeatedly mentioned its HE who teaches, HE who clarifies....if you TRULY TRULY read the Quran, these Hadith dont fit...it totally destroyed how we believe in Allah, how we are supposed to live our everyday lives according to the Quran ....according to the Quran (25:30)
And the Messenger has said, "O my Lord, indeed my people have taken this Qur'an as [a thing] abandoned."
read the entire Quran NOWHERE will you find anything to follow Hadith...for MANY a times through the Quran Allah keeps asking what other HADITH will you believe in....when and only when the prophet is with you you follow him, but he's not here so the Quran is what he taught...there are 3 versions of his farewell sermon....one says "I have left behind the Quran and my sunnah" the other " I have left behind the Quran and Ahl bayt" the other "I have left behind the Quran"....if you ask well "how would we know how to pray, hajj etc", it shows absence in your belief in Allah...
Mr. Hamza, as a scholar of religion that you are claiming to be, would shed light on accepting testimony of a single woman where Quran says 1 man or 2 women?
Secondly, reporting systematic hadieth from likes of Abu Hurayra by 1000 but very few from Ali ibn Abu Talib, would you say?
Thanks
Wa salaam
there are very few from umar too. what does that mean?
there are very few from uthman too, what does it mean
It's not always 2:1 testimony . It applies only in financial matters . When in comes to women's matters like pregnancy , breast feeding , the woman's testimony has more weightage . In all other matters it's 1:1
@@sabiak4506 in pregnancy women?! Very well. Then why umar killed a woman during his rien and because her her husband reported her of certain act and umar sentenced her to death since she had given birth to a child after 6 months marriage.
Premature birth of children are nothing new so why umar killed her? If you say what you said.
Unless you acknowledge that the whole sunni school is based on fabrication
@@husseinmohamed9673 they both weren't raised by the prophet, they didn't sit on his lap or stood on his shoulders...
@@truthseeker-cz6lf do you have a source for that hadeeth?
Even if the narrator is Abu Hurayra, not naming the source of the narrations as Abu Hurayra did a lot is a break in the chain. The Sahaba should be held to the same standard as everyone else when it comes to hadith criticism. We shouldn't just assume things when it comes to doctorines of God.
Could you provide examples from Sahih Bukhari and Muslim?
The sahaba are not like you and i.
*****
Yes they are. They are humans who sinned just like us. Some of them are going to hell and some will go to Paradise.
gmc0351
Didn't Hamza say that that's what Abu Hurayra did?
Anthony the Sahaba are all right and are not going to hell! the prophet said according to a hadith that the companions are like the stars, if you follow any of them you shall be guided!
You and I are nothing like the Sahaba!
So basically, if a Sahabi said it, then it doesn't need a chain or proof! What's funny is that you mock the Shia in believing in the infallibility of our Prophet (sawa) and Imams (as), and yet you treat the Sahabi, many of whom were highly questionable as infallible! Abu Huraira was nothing more than a hadith-generating machine... or a fabricator (linguistically correct) of hadith.
We don't treat sahabis (ra) as infallible.. Just as we don't treat Ali (ra) as infallible unlike you shias. They were average human beings guided by Islam. But prone to making mistakes. Without Islam, they would be nothing. Just as Ali is nothing without Islam. Without Islam, there would be no difference between Ali and abu jahl.. It's Islam that made Ali one of the greatest just as omar is one of the greatest because of Islam. Being cousin of Allah's Messenger (PBUH) wouldn't save Ali if he didn't accept Islam just as it didn't save abu lahab who was the uncle of the prophet because of abu lahab's defiance and mockery. Prophet (PBUH) is the only Person infallible.. But sahabis were not.. They made mistakes. They had their differences in opinions. They fought each other due to misunderstanding that was incited by some hypocrites. But at the end of the day, they are the best of mankind after all the Prophets (PBUH). Abu bakr, omar, uthman, Ali. May Allah give them the highest of honour in paradise.. We don't dare to disrespect any of them because they are far far superior to us commoners and they made unfathomable sacrifices for Allah and His Messenger.. We don't dare to point out their little mistakes..
Where in the Quran did Allah say rejecting a mutawatir hadith is kufr?
NOWHERE!!!
Logical fatwa dilaysoh
*****
I said in the Quran. Not some fatwa from a man. I want the fatwa from Allah.
Logical where in the Qur'an does it say to accept hadith?
NOWHERE!!!
*****
Exactly. We are not supposed to follow hadith. Especially from people who won't name their sources like Abu Hurayra.
Logical interesting you have bluntly stated that the Quran doesnt say rejecting a mutawatir hadith is kufr. but where in the Quran does it say that the hadith is a viable source of narrations
( في أصحابي 12 منافقاً )
There are 12 hypocrites among My (SAW) companions.
صحيح مسلم - صفات المنافقين وأحكامهم - باب - رقم الحديث : ( 4983 )
- حدثنا : أبوبكر بن أبي شيبة ، حدثنا : أسود بن عامر ، حدثنا : شعبة بن الحجاج ، عن قتادة ، عن أبي نضرة ، عن قيس قال : قلت لعمار أرأيتم صنيعكم هذا الذي صنعتم في أمر علي أرأيا رأيتموه أو شيئاً عهده إليكم رسول الله (ص) فقال : ما عهد إلينا رسول الله (ص) شيئاً لم يعهده إلى الناس كافة ولكن حذيفة أخبرني : ، عن النبي (ص) قال : قال النبي (ص) في أصحابي إثنا عشر منافقاً فيهم ثمانية لا يدخلون الجنة حتى يلج الجمل في سم الخياط ثمانية منهم تكفيكهم الدبيلة ، وأربعة لم أحفظ ما قال شعبة فيهم.
Omar beating Abu Hurairah for amassing wealth by false narration of ahadith
ابن عبد ربه الأندلسي - العقد الفريد - كتاب اللؤلؤة في السلطان
ما يأخذ به السلطان من الحزم والعزم - عمرو أبو موسى الأشعري وأبو هريرة والحارث
الجزء : ( 1 ) - رقم الصفحة : ( 44 )
- .... ثم دعا أبا هريرة ، فقال له : هل علمت من حين أني استعملتك على البحرين وأنت بلا نعلين ، ثم بلغني أنك ابتعت أفراسا بألف دينار وستمائة دينار ، قال : كانت لنا أفراس تناتجت ، وعطايا تلاحقت ، قال : قد حسبت لك رزقك ومؤونتك وهذا فضل فأده ، قال : ليس لك ذلك ، قال : بلى والله وأوجع ظهرك ، ثم قام إليه بالدرة فضربه حتى أدماه ، ثم قال : إيت بها ، قال : احتسبتها عند الله.