Partially by luring and lying to those who had the talent and ability to build the machines, who trusted and believed that they were working to make better lives for themselves and their descendants. Also, making 'money' to pay them out of thin air and lies.
Just print money, like they do now. Did u know they give u money that doesnt even exist just by printing money, they create money when they have debt and that is why there is inflation every year. The media wont tell u this
There is virtually no one that will slow AI down, no one that will regulate it. All the pressure will be on making it first and that means it will not be aligned with any goal humanity would have.
Than again if there are other higher intelligence in the Universe and in fact there are, even on Earth, than it is the only way of getting a fighting chance against them. People have been kept stupid by extraterrestrial "gods" for the past 5000 years, except the last 200 years where an era of enlightenment and technological progress started. That is why the "right-wing" proponents who are aligned with those "gods" want to hold the progress on AI - it's the only thing that can stop them from controlling humanity. They are scared of AI as a creation that is potentially able to outsmart them and give humanity the freedom it should have from the start.
5:05 “…further democratising the creation of visual content.” This is one of the most bone-chilling things I’ve heard. Anyone can change anything to be what they want? Truth will cease to exist. It terrifies me.
The truth hasn't mattered for years. Postmodernism and it's vile products such as intersectional identity politics, Wokeism and indoctrination of students by Leftist professors who believe the West is inherently corrupt, racist, sexist, misogynistic, homophobic, transphobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic, imperialistic and divided simply between the "oppressor" (white people, usually straight white men) and the "oppressed" (all people of color, women, all minorities including the LGBTQWXYZ community) instead of the proletariat vs bourgeoisie typical of classical Marxism's class struggle. The truth is now what you want it to be.
"invention of guns will be terrible ... it democratizes killing..." said some wise guy in the middle ages and yet here we are with them being available to anyone with the thrills and pockets for it.
You haven't been paying much attention to what's already been going on around you. You can shop for whatever truth you want online and get proof to support it. We have transitioned into a post fact reality. It started with the general acceptance of fake news. If you don't like something, it's fake news. We are well on our way. Sorry.
It is fascinated to imagine what could happen between now and 2045. The problem is that we the humans are to stupid and We might end up destroying ourselves way before 2045. I really miss my cave days.
What's crazy to me, is that humans won't even be a pin prick in the history of the universe and that one day in the relatively near future, we won't exist at all.
At least they are not to be allowed out of their system. These are people who have sustained an ongoing nuclear war that eventually moved underground. Yet they are all over the planet again and waring again! They are much too vicious for inclusion.
All’s we are is just blips in the universal time scale! I mean in about 1 trillion years all stars start to die off 1 by 1, without any new ones being created with the last red dwarf stars dying 40 trillion after 130 trillion the last sun burns out the age of starlight comes to an end entering the degenerate era, A cosmic boneyard if you will filled with the remnants of dead stars! Eventually, everything is so far apart that eventually In 43 trillion trillion trillion to 350 trillion trillion trillion protons decay “it’s a theory, no proof atm”…. Now, does this matter to any conscious mortal being’s? No, well except any that survives the destruction of earth, solar system and our galaxy! But hey, that’s future life problem. Surely it will find a way or evolve into something no longer biological or the scales of time, extreme cold are irrelevant!
Remember if we do end up capable of making a sentient AI, what you have to be afraid of is if it can start inventing and developing products without human help, then it could turn out dangerous and see us as a hindrance, especially if we try to get in its way. Luckily enough that time is not anywhere near yet. The complexities of our brain is far beyond what computer programming can achieve. It probably will not be in our lifetime. Algorithms will get more advanced, but the inside of thousands of processors just isn’t capable of producing a Sentient being. It will be trapped inside a supercomputer if it ever did happen, and that is hard to vision how you could get a brain that works like ours but has no senses or emotions inside a massive computer.
The theory about people not having to work interests me. This may mean that communism would be the only political system that would function in a no-work society, as everyone would need eother a universal basic income and assests and resources would need to be shared equally amongst the population. However, communism doesn't work without high levels of negative control.
Not sure why they wouldn't make any highly advanced AI with Asimov's 3 laws hard coded into them, that could save an awful lot of trouble. "A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law."
Yes but two smart robots (R. Giskard Reventlov and R. Daneel Olivaw) created the law 0 of robotic where a robot must protect humanity before human. Then, it is not impossible for a robot to create a -1 law of robotic where a robot must protect the existence of a protector of humanity then a robot may finally considers a robot as more human than a genuine human because what is a human being? A genetic code, a form of intelligence, a creature with a soul, something else? Asimov clearly demonstrated that its own 3 laws are far from inviolable. If a human can so easily break all moral barriers why robots or AI won't?
You forgot to mention one important detail: the amount of energy the IA needs. That impose a problem for the IA and could be a safe guard for humanity because we only need to have control over the switch. As soon as the IA turns crazy, we turn the switch off and the IA can say his silicon ass goodbye
It seems a bit utopian to me to think about superintelligence and a singularity because it’s possible that it’s impossible for a singularity to be born from a binary and logically structured programming language. Human intelligence, our mind, our consciousness, whatever you want to call it, does not work in binary with 0s and 1s. There is more than logic and reasoning in our intelligence, there is the notion of concepts and the depth of knowledge… For example, imagine a program that plays chess, it is better than any human who plays chess, but the question we must ask ourselves is that the program does not know what chess is, it just calculates… Imagine a person who wants to become a sexologist, she can read all the books in the world and watch all the movies, if she has never made love, she cannot understand in the same way that a machine cannot have a concept of good or evil, a concept at the level of emotions, reasoning, etc. And it is quite possible that it is impossible for such intelligence or reasoning (singularity) to be born from a logical program created by man that is binary and structured, etc. I believe we are more likely to see very fast and stupid robots than intelligent ones, etc.
On a physical, biological, chemical level, consciousness is an emergent phenomenon. Read a first-semester neuropsychology textbook: binary logic gates in neurons and through synaptic pathways are the foundation of signal propagation and suppression throughout the grey matter and throughout the nervous system. Either there is or is not enough potential for energy to trip the signal propagation (across the synaptic cleft and along a dendrite or axon), or there is not. Johnn von Neumann, The Computer and the Brain: ~pg 24: Timed pulses and pulse intensity along a time trajectory ~pg 54/55: Summation Time ~pg 56: Simulation criteria for receptors I'm very aware that there is another reality to human consciousness outside the electrochemical foundations we can prove and with which we can predict behavior. I'm referring directly here to supersensory and paranormal phenomena such as telepathy, life after death (ghosts), and dream travel (into parallel dimensions and back and forth in time). These are very, VERY real. But... it is also just as real that your personality can be dramatically and irrevocably altered with even very small changes to just the right group of neurons, as can your memory. And it is also true that rudimentary machine learning started with modeling neurons and neutral activity as closely as possible to complex interactions in binary logic and Boolean logic. To say that there is much more to humanity than just binary electrochemical reactions is valid and very true, given our ability to dream of the future and to engage telepathically with non-human intelligences. But to say that consciousness - artificial or otherwise - cannot emerge from binary interactions or activity is arrogant. You are wise to be especially concerned about machine-learning and AI capability, now. It's almost here, maybe 3 years tops. Hang on to your butts.
What kind of mysterious stuff would it be that makes up our minds? Our brains are made of the same atoms as a computer. AIs today are already smarter than most humans in any way we can measure it.
There needs to be more videos examining this critical, overwhelming but largely neglected subject: what are the ramifications of the unprecedented and rapidly accelerating speed of human technological progress? Are humans just the dna-based delivery system for the coming android/cyborg singularity? Looks that way :(
7:29 the most important problem our species has to resolve is conflict and war, with of course the threat of nuclear war. Until this occurs the AI alignment problem can’t be fully solved.
peak civilization will be when humans no longer have to work jobs if they don’t want to. technology is supposed to work for us, not against us. we will know that humanity has truly reached a pinnacle when that day comes. most people work jobs that they despise to simply put food on the table. it’s an unfortunate reality but one that we must have to keep society running as it is currently. but I hope and believe that there will be a day that technology will be able to do the services/jobs for us and we can focus our time and energy on other things instead of working a 9-5, 6 days a week. but of course, if you want to work for whatever reason (maybe you don’t have any hobbies), then I think that option should still be available.
Let's be optimistic, the fear of death is always strong in human and this affects his activities. Though the fear of death is as good as it is limiting. If our predecessors had been so fearful of the danger of crossing the great oceans to explore other worlds we would never have had the opportunity to be discussing these types of topics. And remember, post human kinds that may eventually inherit our technologies today will not remember those who were considering the threat that AI or AGI may pose to our civilization. But they will remember and praise those who actually took the risks and proliferate the enterprise.
Human never satisfied what they have own ! We want more and more so every action has reaction don't worry if you are good person definitely good with you.
@9:20: Were we talking about frisbee? 8 billion homeless Frisbee enthusiasts You didn't have to wait until 2029 for that, there's a whole city of them in San Francisco and Seattle
AI is a non starter. It’s in its core only able to copy existing things. It is close to impossible still to create something that can have original thought.
Dont worry. The universe ALWAYS finds a balance. The further we get from being in tune with the earth... and as long as we use non renewable resources for EVERYTHING, we dont stand a chance. Lifes no ordeal, if youve come to terms.....
This system will have access to every post anyone has ever posted and will know you better than yourself, so it will definitely know your intent long before you do
We are a species used to slow gradual change that is easily denied. That makes it difficult for us collectively to go through rapid change as we are now and will as it progresses. Considering all the variables we have to endure first, (i.e. "if we don't blow ourselves up, if.... if....") we need solutions sooner rather than later. We should have already solved some of these problems. Unfortunately we have the tendency to keep doing business as usual. People wanted to "go back to normal" during covid, failing to realize that normal is killing us. We're about to witness that for ourselves.
Bruh Humanity has always rapidly evolved, which is why we've always been at the top of the food chain. The very moment we discovered Fire, boom giant leap, We used to take MONTHS to communicate by letters, then we layed the Transatlantic telegraph cable across the oceans, boom communicate in minutes, We used to rely on physical libraries, Then created the internet, boom near instant info at your fingertips, the list goes on and on and on, we ain't stoppin OR slowin down. 😎🤙
Hunting: 200.000BC took 13.000 Years to develop - Farming: 4700BC took 860 Years to develop - Science/Commerce: 1730AD took 58 Years to develop - Industry 1903AD took 15 Years to develop - AI 2023AD how many years it will take to develop? 5 years? Or less...?
Well if it was 1945 and we vanished…..they’d still have a chance…..Today?? I’m not so sure, a mass extinction appears to be in progress…..Nature though not starting from scratch…kwill still take millennia to start building a new food web as the damage we have caused slowly subsides and conditions return to more the way they should’ve been.
As a mental health nurse researcher and social scientist, I would like to share some thoughts. Planet Earth is approximately 4.5 billion years old. Our energy source, the Sun, is expected to last another 4.5 billion years, and by 1.5 billion years it will already be a not-so-friendly ball of fire. So in the grand scheme of things, we’re not as significant as we might think. Our species’ ancestors have been evolving for millions of years, with *Homo sapiens* emerging roughly 300,000 years ago. In the relatively short span of 5,000 years since the first civilizations, we’ve drastically altered the planet’s external appearance-particularly in the last 200 years. The premise of any prediction about the future, as the video says, is often framed as: "If we don’t destroy ourselves first." Well, the truth is, we already are-and this has been happening since the dawn of so-called civilization. Let’s put things into perspective: from the beginning of civilizations, we’ve learned to automate and program how to protect our allies-which, in essence, means learning how to kill our enemies. It’s debatable whether possessing this destructive power truly reflects intelligence. Many indigenous tribes demonstrate a form of wisdom that far surpasses modern notions of intelligence. Their purpose is rooted in connection with nature and gratitude for its resources, rather than in dominating it. Unlike the delusional tendencies of modern science to compete and control, these tribes embrace a harmonious relationship with their environment. Yes, humanity has "tamed" nature to some extent, but we’ve lost sight of the bigger picture. Our economic system prioritizes short-term profit, and our collective attention span has been further diminished by social media and dopamine-driven distractions. These serve as painkillers, numbing us to the absurdity and unsustainability of our current system. By the 1980s, people with access to basic information about future risks were already building bunkers. Today, we’re witnessing the slow unraveling of the technological promises that once defined modern life. While we cling to abstract ideals like democracy and human rights, these values are repeatedly ignored in practice. We’ve created a world where a good quality of life is reserved for the wealthy. Ironically, even the rich, consumed by luxury and reliant on others to meet their needs, are detached from the practical knowledge of survival. Ultimately, humanity may need to return to living as many indigenous tribes do-sharing resources and labor equally. Advanced weaponry or wealth will be meaningless in a world where survival demands cooperation. In my view, what sets humans apart from other animals isn’t intelligence but our unique ability to lose ourselves in delusional thoughts and conclusions. That said, humanity also possesses beautiful characteristics, such as empathy and the ability to help one another. In this sense, we share much in common with other living beings, who also sometimes demonstrate the capacity to extend empathy beyond their direct relatives. As a species, we could do much better and actually work to protect all forms of life. However, while this potential exists in individuals-volunteers and altruists, for example-it doesn’t seem to be reflected on a broader cultural scale. Instead, we systematically learn to hate and harm specific groups while caring for others, and to torture and kill certain beings while petting and cherishing others. This contradiction underscores how much work remains for humanity to align its actions with its higher potential.
Well , thanks to AI , I will be jobless and dead of starvation in a year ( or less) , so , its doesn't matter what will happens in the world in this near future. :(
Don't worry about 2045, the way it's going we won't see 2025 here on Earth lol. Maybe AI(AGI) is what is needed to kick start the quest of exploring our galaxy and beyond? Certainly wont get right far if we rely on human intelligence alone.
Quick question: How would companies make money when almost everyone’s lost their job to a machine?
Companies won't exist. They will all be replaced by AI, who will have no use for money
Partially by luring and lying to those who had the talent and ability to build the machines, who trusted and believed that they were working to make better lives for themselves and their descendants. Also, making 'money' to pay them out of thin air and lies.
Just print money, like they do now. Did u know they give u money that doesnt even exist just by printing money, they create money when they have debt and that is why there is inflation every year. The media wont tell u this
Capitalism requires growth, not people.
Well you have organs, don't you?
There is virtually no one that will slow AI down, no one that will regulate it. All the pressure will be on making it first and that means it will not be aligned with any goal humanity would have.
Than again if there are other higher intelligence in the Universe and in fact there are, even on Earth, than it is the only way of getting a fighting chance against them. People have been kept stupid by extraterrestrial "gods" for the past 5000 years, except the last 200 years where an era of enlightenment and technological progress started.
That is why the "right-wing" proponents who are aligned with those "gods" want to hold the progress on AI - it's the only thing that can stop them from controlling humanity. They are scared of AI as a creation that is potentially able to outsmart them and give humanity the freedom it should have from the start.
5:05 “…further democratising the creation of visual content.” This is one of the most bone-chilling things I’ve heard. Anyone can change anything to be what they want? Truth will cease to exist. It terrifies me.
The truth hasn't mattered for years. Postmodernism and it's vile products such as intersectional identity politics, Wokeism and indoctrination of students by Leftist professors who believe the West is inherently corrupt, racist, sexist, misogynistic, homophobic, transphobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic, imperialistic and divided simply between the "oppressor" (white people, usually straight white men) and the "oppressed" (all people of color, women, all minorities including the LGBTQWXYZ community) instead of the proletariat vs bourgeoisie typical of classical Marxism's class struggle.
The truth is now what you want it to be.
True, but then also say for example you hate what Amazon did with Rings of Power, you could edit it to actually be something you like.
"invention of guns will be terrible ... it democratizes killing..." said some wise guy in the middle ages and yet here we are with them being available to anyone with the thrills and pockets for it.
@@Patrick-y4d1z That alone would be worth it
You haven't been paying much attention to what's already been going on around you. You can shop for whatever truth you want online and get proof to support it. We have transitioned into a post fact reality. It started with the general acceptance of fake news. If you don't like something, it's fake news. We are well on our way. Sorry.
It is fascinated to imagine what could happen between now and 2045. The problem is that we the humans are to stupid and We might end up destroying ourselves way before 2045. I really miss my cave days.
What's crazy to me, is that humans won't even be a pin prick in the history of the universe and that one day in the relatively near future, we won't exist at all.
Lol, I'm built differently. I will.
At least they are not to be allowed out of their system. These are people who have sustained an ongoing nuclear war that eventually moved underground. Yet they are all over the planet again and waring again! They are much too vicious for inclusion.
Trash, we're going to the stars
All’s we are is just blips in the universal time scale! I mean in about 1 trillion years all stars start to die off 1 by 1, without any new ones being created with the last red dwarf stars dying 40 trillion after 130 trillion the last sun burns out the age of starlight comes to an end entering the degenerate era, A cosmic boneyard if you will filled with the remnants of dead stars! Eventually, everything is so far apart that eventually In 43 trillion trillion trillion to 350 trillion trillion trillion protons decay “it’s a theory, no proof atm”….
Now, does this matter to any conscious mortal being’s? No, well except any that survives the destruction of earth, solar system and our galaxy! But hey, that’s future life problem. Surely it will find a way or evolve into something no longer biological or the scales of time, extreme cold are irrelevant!
@TheJohnwayne2010 This is science, not religion.
Remember if we do end up capable of making a sentient AI, what you have to be afraid of is if it can start inventing and developing products without human help, then it could turn out dangerous and see us as a hindrance, especially if we try to get in its way.
Luckily enough that time is not anywhere near yet. The complexities of our brain is far beyond what computer programming can achieve. It probably will not be in our lifetime. Algorithms will get more advanced, but the inside of thousands of processors just isn’t capable of producing a Sentient being.
It will be trapped inside a supercomputer if it ever did happen, and that is hard to vision how you could get a brain that works like ours but has no senses or emotions inside a massive computer.
By digitising the human mind and manipulating it and integrating it into an AI... now that is some crazy scary stuff!
AIs are, today, better at most human tasks than a majority of humans. That includes advanced scientific ones.
The theory about people not having to work interests me. This may mean that communism would be the only political system that would function in a no-work society, as everyone would need eother a universal basic income and assests and resources would need to be shared equally amongst the population. However, communism doesn't work without high levels of negative control.
Not sure why they wouldn't make any highly advanced AI with Asimov's 3 laws hard coded into them, that could save an awful lot of trouble.
"A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law."
Yes but two smart robots (R. Giskard Reventlov and R. Daneel Olivaw) created the law 0 of robotic where a robot must protect humanity before human. Then, it is not impossible for a robot to create a -1 law of robotic where a robot must protect the existence of a protector of humanity then a robot may finally considers a robot as more human than a genuine human because what is a human being? A genetic code, a form of intelligence, a creature with a soul, something else? Asimov clearly demonstrated that its own 3 laws are far from inviolable. If a human can so easily break all moral barriers why robots or AI won't?
Top tip. Always turn your internet off at night. That stops AI.
Explain please 🤔
@@claylexander6171 just a joke, nothing more.
The doom loop music really sets the mood
Where do you get high quality images for your thumbnail? How to make thumbnails like Science Time?
You forgot to mention one important detail: the amount of energy the IA needs. That impose a problem for the IA and could be a safe guard for humanity because we only need to have control over the switch. As soon as the IA turns crazy, we turn the switch off and the IA can say his silicon ass goodbye
It seems a bit utopian to me to think about superintelligence and a singularity because it’s possible that it’s impossible for a singularity to be born from a binary and logically structured programming language. Human intelligence, our mind, our consciousness, whatever you want to call it, does not work in binary with 0s and 1s. There is more than logic and reasoning in our intelligence, there is the notion of concepts and the depth of knowledge… For example, imagine a program that plays chess, it is better than any human who plays chess, but the question we must ask ourselves is that the program does not know what chess is, it just calculates… Imagine a person who wants to become a sexologist, she can read all the books in the world and watch all the movies, if she has never made love, she cannot understand in the same way that a machine cannot have a concept of good or evil, a concept at the level of emotions, reasoning, etc. And it is quite possible that it is impossible for such intelligence or reasoning (singularity) to be born from a logical program created by man that is binary and structured, etc. I believe we are more likely to see very fast and stupid robots than intelligent ones, etc.
Not sure if that makes me feel better or worse.
On a physical, biological, chemical level, consciousness is an emergent phenomenon. Read a first-semester neuropsychology textbook: binary logic gates in neurons and through synaptic pathways are the foundation of signal propagation and suppression throughout the grey matter and throughout the nervous system. Either there is or is not enough potential for energy to trip the signal propagation (across the synaptic cleft and along a dendrite or axon), or there is not.
Johnn von Neumann, The Computer and the Brain:
~pg 24: Timed pulses and pulse intensity along a time trajectory
~pg 54/55: Summation Time
~pg 56: Simulation criteria for receptors
I'm very aware that there is another reality to human consciousness outside the electrochemical foundations we can prove and with which we can predict behavior. I'm referring directly here to supersensory and paranormal phenomena such as telepathy, life after death (ghosts), and dream travel (into parallel dimensions and back and forth in time). These are very, VERY real.
But... it is also just as real that your personality can be dramatically and irrevocably altered with even very small changes to just the right group of neurons, as can your memory. And it is also true that rudimentary machine learning started with modeling neurons and neutral activity as closely as possible to complex interactions in binary logic and Boolean logic.
To say that there is much more to humanity than just binary electrochemical reactions is valid and very true, given our ability to dream of the future and to engage telepathically with non-human intelligences.
But to say that consciousness - artificial or otherwise - cannot emerge from binary interactions or activity is arrogant.
You are wise to be especially concerned about machine-learning and AI capability, now. It's almost here, maybe 3 years tops.
Hang on to your butts.
What kind of mysterious stuff would it be that makes up our minds? Our brains are made of the same atoms as a computer.
AIs today are already smarter than most humans in any way we can measure it.
There needs to be more videos examining this critical, overwhelming but largely neglected subject: what are the ramifications of the unprecedented and rapidly accelerating speed of human technological progress?
Are humans just the dna-based delivery system for the coming android/cyborg singularity?
Looks that way :(
I'll probably be dead by 2045 so I hope we'll reach technical singularity by then.
If we reach Singularity, it's possible (probable) that ASI will be able to bring everyone back to life.
Considering the situation, I strongly support the idea of Roko's Basilisk and embracing the Singularity
7:29 the most important problem our species has to resolve is conflict and war, with of course the threat of nuclear war. Until this occurs the AI alignment problem can’t be fully solved.
How many nukes have been dropped on civilians in the last 80 years?...
Im depressed
There needs to be a possibility to prevent the singularity
I really hope we don't blow ourselves up
We’re all doomed
This channel is sick.
Is this video made by ai?
This video was Extraordinary!!!
peak civilization will be when humans no longer have to work jobs if they don’t want to. technology is supposed to work for us, not against us. we will know that humanity has truly reached a pinnacle when that day comes. most people work jobs that they despise to simply put food on the table. it’s an unfortunate reality but one that we must have to keep society running as it is currently. but I hope and believe that there will be a day that technology will be able to do the services/jobs for us and we can focus our time and energy on other things instead of working a 9-5, 6 days a week. but of course, if you want to work for whatever reason (maybe you don’t have any hobbies), then I think that option should still be available.
The singularity will inevitably be humanity's last invention.
scariest channel ever!!! I love it.
Humans are built different
I can't wait to visit Westeros when full immersion VR is available.
Let's be optimistic, the fear of death is always strong in human and this affects his activities. Though the fear of death is as good as it is limiting.
If our predecessors had been so fearful of the danger of crossing the great oceans to explore other worlds we would never have had the opportunity to be discussing these types of topics. And remember, post human kinds that may eventually inherit our technologies today will not remember those who were considering the threat that AI or AGI may pose to our civilization. But they will remember and praise those who actually took the risks and proliferate the enterprise.
As Private James Frazer said "We're doomed!"
What about machine consciousness? Self-awareness and the capacity for subjective inner experiences?
If it seems so dangerous or unpredicteble, why do we keep creating and impeoving AI technologies?
Humans gonna human.
Human never satisfied what they have own ! We want more and more so every action has reaction don't worry if you are good person definitely good with you.
Can’t wait to merge with the machines
Elon’s AI robot Optimus walks in.
Will GTA 6 be out?
Probably not
Good bideo
Finally AGI can enter the CAPTCHA
Seems like this planet has been too corrupted to salvage...this is not my world. I'm just visiting.
People are getting much more inherently "Lazy," these days. Especially the younger generations.
Ultimately, you could always just unplug it.
We'd need a huge kill switch
@9:20: Were we talking about frisbee? 8 billion homeless Frisbee enthusiasts
You didn't have to wait until 2029 for that, there's a whole city of them in San Francisco and Seattle
AI is a non starter. It’s in its core only able to copy existing things. It is close to impossible still to create something that can have original thought.
Dont worry. The universe ALWAYS finds a balance. The further we get from being in tune with the earth... and as long as we use non renewable resources for EVERYTHING, we dont stand a chance. Lifes no ordeal, if youve come to terms.....
Life extension and rejuvenation. Repairing the bugged mess that is the human genome and brain.
My expiration date is 2042.
Why is this in my subscriptions?
a warp drive and a replicator Mr AGI plz :P
This system will have access to every post anyone has ever posted and will know you better than yourself, so it will definitely know your intent long before you do
Colossus is almost here.
just snort some of that stuff that lucy took and have a one outs with it
Heinrich event incoming.
this video title was definitely misleading
AI talking about AI... Irony much?
We are a species used to slow gradual change that is easily denied. That makes it difficult for us collectively to go through rapid change as we are now and will as it progresses. Considering all the variables we have to endure first, (i.e. "if we don't blow ourselves up, if.... if....") we need solutions sooner rather than later. We should have already solved some of these problems. Unfortunately we have the tendency to keep doing business as usual. People wanted to "go back to normal" during covid, failing to realize that normal is killing us. We're about to witness that for ourselves.
I’m not the first to say it: the only “normal” is that nothing stays the same. The only reliable constant is change.
Bruh Humanity has always rapidly evolved, which is why we've always been at the top of the food chain. The very moment we discovered Fire, boom giant leap, We used to take MONTHS to communicate by letters, then we layed the Transatlantic telegraph cable across the oceans, boom communicate in minutes, We used to rely on physical libraries, Then created the internet, boom near instant info at your fingertips, the list goes on and on and on, we ain't stoppin OR slowin down. 😎🤙
Hunting: 200.000BC took 13.000 Years to develop - Farming: 4700BC took 860 Years to develop - Science/Commerce: 1730AD took 58 Years to develop - Industry 1903AD took 15 Years to develop - AI 2023AD how many years it will take to develop? 5 years? Or less...?
Well AIs exist today connected to weapons systems. Even nukes. That's not in the best interest of humanity exactly.
The metro of Thessaloniki for sure no.
I really prefer to envision 2045 without us. For the benefit of all other living beings on this planet.
Well if it was 1945 and we vanished…..they’d still have a chance…..Today?? I’m not so sure, a mass extinction appears to be in progress…..Nature though not starting from scratch…kwill still take millennia to start building a new food web as the damage we have caused slowly subsides and conditions return to more the way they should’ve been.
Best of luck to you
Guaranteed Basic Income & Microhydrin... keep Social Work. 11:20
Asteriod needs to hurry
Where will AI get it’s physical energy?
Ha! Ever seen the Matrix ?
Solar?
What a time to be alive ❤❤❤ .
As a mental health nurse researcher and social scientist, I would like to share some thoughts.
Planet Earth is approximately 4.5 billion years old. Our energy source, the Sun, is expected to last another 4.5 billion years, and by 1.5 billion years it will already be a not-so-friendly ball of fire. So in the grand scheme of things, we’re not as significant as we might think.
Our species’ ancestors have been evolving for millions of years, with *Homo sapiens* emerging roughly 300,000 years ago. In the relatively short span of 5,000 years since the first civilizations, we’ve drastically altered the planet’s external appearance-particularly in the last 200 years.
The premise of any prediction about the future, as the video says, is often framed as: "If we don’t destroy ourselves first."
Well, the truth is, we already are-and this has been happening since the dawn of so-called civilization.
Let’s put things into perspective: from the beginning of civilizations, we’ve learned to automate and program how to protect our allies-which, in essence, means learning how to kill our enemies. It’s debatable whether possessing this destructive power truly reflects intelligence.
Many indigenous tribes demonstrate a form of wisdom that far surpasses modern notions of intelligence. Their purpose is rooted in connection with nature and gratitude for its resources, rather than in dominating it. Unlike the delusional tendencies of modern science to compete and control, these tribes embrace a harmonious relationship with their environment.
Yes, humanity has "tamed" nature to some extent, but we’ve lost sight of the bigger picture. Our economic system prioritizes short-term profit, and our collective attention span has been further diminished by social media and dopamine-driven distractions. These serve as painkillers, numbing us to the absurdity and unsustainability of our current system.
By the 1980s, people with access to basic information about future risks were already building bunkers. Today, we’re witnessing the slow unraveling of the technological promises that once defined modern life. While we cling to abstract ideals like democracy and human rights, these values are repeatedly ignored in practice.
We’ve created a world where a good quality of life is reserved for the wealthy. Ironically, even the rich, consumed by luxury and reliant on others to meet their needs, are detached from the practical knowledge of survival.
Ultimately, humanity may need to return to living as many indigenous tribes do-sharing resources and labor equally. Advanced weaponry or wealth will be meaningless in a world where survival demands cooperation.
In my view, what sets humans apart from other animals isn’t intelligence but our unique ability to lose ourselves in delusional thoughts and conclusions. That said, humanity also possesses beautiful characteristics, such as empathy and the ability to help one another. In this sense, we share much in common with other living beings, who also sometimes demonstrate the capacity to extend empathy beyond their direct relatives. As a species, we could do much better and actually work to protect all forms of life.
However, while this potential exists in individuals-volunteers and altruists, for example-it doesn’t seem to be reflected on a broader cultural scale. Instead, we systematically learn to hate and harm specific groups while caring for others, and to torture and kill certain beings while petting and cherishing others. This contradiction underscores how much work remains for humanity to align its actions with its higher potential.
TLDR
Well , thanks to AI , I will be jobless and dead of starvation in a year ( or less) , so , its doesn't matter what will happens in the world in this near future. :(
don’t be dramatic. there are people living in third world counties who still find ways to eat with no money.
What’s up dawg?
I'm not a big fan of people anyway.
Science Fiction Time
cant beleive it i was first
So uuuuh
11 11
First!
im not gonna waste 11min of my time listening to u only to find out ur wrong
The woman has to float your boat
Don't worry about 2045, the way it's going we won't see 2025 here on Earth lol. Maybe AI(AGI) is what is needed to kick start the quest of exploring our galaxy and beyond? Certainly wont get right far if we rely on human intelligence alone.
Capitalism would stop any of this from happening guaranteed😂😂
The next wars may be between pro-AI evolution against anti-AI evolution countries
Who says so? Time isnt linear.