Solid Logic for ATHEISTS? Let's hear it!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 лис 2023
- Main Channel: / scienceisdope
Free Pseudoscience Game - Spot the BS: bingobaker.com...
Biases and Fallacies:
docs.google.co...
One-time support:
UPI: scienceisdope@icici
buymeacoffee.c...
Patreon: / scienceisdope_
To join my WhatsApp community: nas.io/science...
Discord: / discord
Subbreddit: / scienceisdope - Розваги
By that logic Batman exist that's why they say Batman doesn't exist 😂
I am BATMAN
I am BATMAN !!
I AM BATMAN
I AM BATEMAN
I am betman
this guy is next level beyond Zakir Naik ... i would love to ask the audience if they are actually sentient and somehow measure the profound depth of their gulliblity ...
the fact that they are attending him itself speaks volume about their coherence !
Lmao exactly, how can one agree that existence is "relative", we never hear, this exists relative to that
At 11:02, another fallacy. He said that just like Einstein is your authority, our authority is the God(Krishna). It shows the fact that how stupid he is. We don't consider Einstein as authority, instead his contribution to the Scientific Community which has adequate evidence. We respect Einstein not because he created his theories, but he discovered the laws of physics that he presented in his theories (with evidence)
It's basically strawman of atheists and misrepresentation of scientific method.
There is no scientific community,it's a jargon, if scientists are also in the community that will beat the purpose of science itself 😂
@@NareshChandernaresh ayo brother, I tried to write it in the most simplest way so that if readers from iskcon come they can understand.. 🤣
Why not shiv or indra? Why only Krishna?
When ramanujan was asked about how did you derive all these amazing mathematical feats which earlier even some of the experts in west ridiculed him of, his answer was it's all because of my goddess lol. I mean even he sounds extremely stupid here but nonetheless he produced credible mathematical proofs.
I DO NOT have a girlfriend = I have a girlfriend
That's the spirit! Fake it til you make it :D
I'm not a pedo, that means.......
I think god exist and doesn't exist at the same time for different sets of humans
Tuje pta nhi pr teri GF hai... 😂
@@vigaming3680Just like djinns. I want my three wishes.
Thanks babaji. Finally got an answer to people saying Spiderman doesn't exist. Or Santa doesn't exist
That'll show those Santa deniers
Humans don't have 4 legs
That means humans have 4 legs that's why you are saying humans don't have 4 legs.
And these chaddi ISCKON logic 😂
Unicorn hai , isiliye wo bolate hai unicorn nahi 🦄😂😂
Lmao, I was thinking literally the same sentence.
unicorn be like : why always drag me into this
so according to his logic if I'm saying He is not stupid, does that mean he is stupid? What?
At 9:49 He is talking about "Shashtra pramaan" which means Scripture (here, he might be referring to Puraana) is the proof that how Krishna looks like. [Shashtra=Scripture; pramaan = proof]
Appeal to Tradition right there
Circular reasoning
Appeal to Vedic scriptures
Or
Appeal to tradition
Or
Circular argument
9:42 He says that we have our "holy books" as proof...
That saint is not a pedo
Because he is 😂
As a hindu guy i fear that they will be going to create a new religion called "hare karishna" from Hinduism
😂😂😂😂
Prabhupada dharma 😂😂😂it's name will be 😂😂😂
Save this into Pranav vs Iskcon playlist 😂
I don’t have money = I have money 😂😂😂
Consistent Pro Max
Fr
Relativity = everything is relative so I can say whatever I want and relate it however I want
Man I used to admire ISKON when I was a child 😢 lol 😊
same brother, i even had to visit them due to my parents forcing this year.
@@santanuroy3329 oh, I visited the Mathura iskcon temple, though I would say I was not forced because I used to saw them as a ultimate denomination of Hinduism and that's why I started admiring them.
@@Shiva-05 I see! I went to Mayapur ISCON. The place was actually pretty peaceful, lots of animals, lots of cowsheds but the speeches were really similar to this video. They would jump from preaching to randomly "exposing" atheists and other sects of hinduism lol
@santanuroy3329
“same brother, i even had [...] parents forcing this year.”
===============
Visit if you have to...
But do your best to avoid giving them any money or service.
Isckon founder prabhupaad supp
Tshinoko is a snake which many claim exists but no one have seen. Somehow I find it really similar to god. A card named tshuchinoko is perfect for this video.
As an nondualist it's a win win situation.
Atheist and dualist fighting.😀
@dharmictalks
“As an nondualist [...] atheist and dualist fighting.😀”
================
Dvaita is an example of mumbo-jumbo that has no credible evidence;
Advaita (non-dualism) is another example of mumbo-jumbo that has no credible evidence.
@@ex.hindu.now.atheist understanding advaitavad ain't easy boy.
I am ex atheist. I know what and how you think.
Tell me what is non dualism ?
@dharmictalks
”understanding advaitavad [...] what is non dualism ?”
=================
Don't you know it yourself, so-called ex atheist?
I know Advaita well enough to know that it is claims without credible evidence.
Any way,
Do you want the long-winded explanation of the Advaita mumbo-jumbo beliefs,
Or a short version of the Advaita mumbo-jumbo beliefs?
@@ex.hindu.now.atheist let's go with short one.
@@ex.hindu.now.atheist waiting ....
Just telling you that all that this mohan rupa guy is saying is also directed at us. He is definitely not making it obvious. In the recent video he somewhere made it obvious.
There is a reason why we are called atheists by people like these. Prachanaa baudha.
That is disguised buddha or atheist.
I was an atheist too but when you focused on outside I went in.
So unicorns, dragons, sphynx and the spaghetti monster do exist.
9:45 He's saying "Hamare pas Sastra pramaan hai" Means "We have proof from Scriptures (Saastra)"
He said, "Shastra Pramaan" (Scriptural Evidence). He basically meant that we (ISKCONites) believe Krishna is god and the portraits of Krishna are accurate because our scriptures say so, similar to how you believe that is the portrait of your grandfather just because your family says so.
😂 Wow. Do you know who made portrait of your grandfather Krishna and you believed that. If religious books are proof then how come there are 5000+ god's who created world but there's only one world 😂
But isn't history the same? We believe certain events (e.g. the lifestyle of civilizations, events leading to its downfall etc.)happened so long ago because we have paintings, sculptures about their lifestyle and journals they wrote.
If we want to know about nature's history, we have a lot of methods(fossils, carbon dating, rocks). But human history is hard because most of it is lost and the only existing sources are paintings and scriptures
@@ghostoflego3390 No history isn't the same. In figuring out history we only relay on what the evidence directly tells us or theories based on said evidence. The paintings, journal etc you talk about help us figure out history by cross-referencing it with our evidence. If they all say the same thing then that means it must be true, however if they say different things, then ofc there is room for debate and speculation, the degree of which depends upon the intensity of differences between them. Now when it comes to religious texts, all of them say different things (like how the origin of the universe is different in different religious texts) plus there is no other evidence to cross-reference it with and check its authenticity. Therefore, religious texts aren't reliable evidence.
@@adityatyagi7296simplified, when you have only source/evidence for your exact claim, it doesn't work.
The snake doesn't bark = 🐍💀
Oh hell nah he used theory of relativity to debunk atheism 😭😭😭
9:42 he meant to say mythological evidence
The best logical and rational hindu I know as an atheist is Swami Vivekananda only..🫡
Who said that you must not believe in God until you have seen or realize it...
It was enough till "seen it". Realisation is not observable in a controlled environment.
Exactly. I have read his works. He often condemns those who conform to religion just for the sake of it, without enquiry and without proof.
He's one of the father of hindu nationalism. Savarakar was also an athiest.
yes savarkar was servant that's why british hated him the most and kept him in dark kala pani cell for more than 13 years. If savarakar was favourite of british why didn't he get any perks like chacha nehru did. Savarkar spent 27 years of his life in jail. have you read his book on 1857 war of independence. many freedom fighters like bhagat singh were inspired from it. @@Kartik-it2qc
Savarkar was not servant of Britishers before kala pani but after kala pani he became their servant,he didn't do any protest against Britishers after kala pani and even bhagat singh was against him because of his communal ideology,even he was inspired of his book of 1857 war...and both Muslim league and Hindu mahasabha were against the freedom fighters, they work for Britishers...
Spiderman (Not the actor but the real one) exist guys
Experts in word games 🎯
There is Santa Claus too..
Bhaiya shastra means he is considering to holy texts like bhagvatam.
My concept about this is pretty simple:
An Atheist doesn't believe that God exists - because there is no proof. At the same time, an Atheist doesn't believe that God doesn't exist - because there is no proof of that either.
Richard Dawkins examples unicorn dragons 😂😂😂 nice
@chessfreak8813
“Richard Dawkins examples unicorn dragons 😂😂😂 nice”
=================
Dragons is actually Carl Sagan's, I think...
in his book ‘The Demon-Haunted World’.
@@ex.hindu.now.atheist I see.. I disappointed by Pranav by lil but he should hv his original analogy and examples 😁
Somebody explain this to me 😂😂😂
Hey pranav. I do really like your content debunking these things, athiesm and all but I do really want to see more scientific content related to actual science on the main channel. Like for eg. That reel showing why attaching a magnet in front of a car will not give you free infinite momentum remember that? Please make more actual scientific videos on the main channel. And as always! Love your work!❤❤❤❤
Same feeling, commented as well on a different video. But he won't listen, because science demands effort. It's much easier to ride the gravy train and play a silly board game. His own understanding of science and research is shoddy, as pointed out a few times. At worst, he becomes as misleading as the people he criticises.
Bhagavat Geeta is philosophical, not religious. There is Vedantic Interpretation of Geeta. Iskcon Distorted the knowledge of Geetas.
There is a clear synonymous difference between a Picture and a Photograph or a portrait.
Y iskcon k lig itna c kese bnjaate h??😢
Iscon is making appeal to Heisenberg's cat 🐈😂😂😂😂
maybe im dumb but isnt it schrodiner's cat?
@@silverseacow exactly 🥲🥲 poor cat 🐈 got involved in this 🙌🏻
Replace "god" with "my hair" and tadaa, he just proved that he has hair.
1:46 this can also be "Non sequitur fallacy" ie., the conclusion derived is unrelated to and doesn't follow the premises.
Science and baba best duo
Irony to write Solid Logic in the title 🤣🤣
@iaryaman79
“Irony to write Solid Logic in the title 🤣🤣”
=============
In iskCON people, there is no illogical thinking. 😉
It's weird that the baba is so fixated on eye witness evidence when in reality it is the weakest form of evidence even for ordinary event as it is always under question on the validity of their claims, now imagine witnessing a supernatural event that defies the laws of physics. How much scrutiny should that bring to that claim.
He don't have horns on his head. But they are there 😂
merko uske peddler ka number chahiye
Sanju baba aur ye ganju baba ka peddler same hai 😂
10:22 sastra praman -proved by sashtra❤😂🎉
Maine to invisible flying alien who created this simulation , usko bhi ny dekha
8:20 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
जबसे यह शुरू हुआ कितनी बार सुन लिया है इस argument को,
इतना बेकार argument होने के बावजूद भी हर कोई 'भक्त' इसे use करता फिरता है।
फिर ऐसे behave करता है कि जैसे उसने कोई बड़ा तीर मार लिया हो🤣
🤦
Ek baat toh saach hai ki Bigfoot/Unicorn/Blehblehbleh exists that's why rationalists say Bigfoot/Unicorn/Blehblehbleh doesn't exist
Schrödinger's bhagwan! Bhagwan both exists and doesn't exist until bhaggu becomes observable. 😆
Left Relative Right, wrong Relative Right 😂
This Iskon BS is getting cringy
it always have
Hey Pranav Please make videos of puri Shankaracharya's videos
Atheist: God doesn't exist
All theist teacher reply: Have u seen your great grand father
moye moye
See k u have seen god ah no right then y do people make it sound God exists come on God does not exist alright so stfu and all other parts in advance so that u understand one thing in life that God never existed neither did he exist or never will he ever exist heard my answer bcoz of u r that patriotic about ur god then do one thing pray to him for one whole day can u do it and if he exists and talks to u then tell me I ll only surrender myself to him or else just stfu about ur belief system
moye moye
@@pralayaryan what do u mean moye moye
@aryabartarout5697
“Atheist: God doesn't [...] great grand father”
=================
Actually, atheism is the ABSENCE OF BELIEF that any god exists.
It is not necessarily the claim that god does not exist.
He is trying justify his belief using ' i am lying ' paradox
Relatively should be tangible
his arguments are so bad, I almost pressed dislike on Pranav's video 🤣. someone in the audience should have claimed that they have a friend next to them but this friend is invisible, intangible and inaudible. If he dares to say that my "friend" doesn't exist then I can make the exact same argument he made in favour of his Krishna, "hai tabhi na keh rahe ki nahi hai".
Then why do believers say that god is omnipresent or sarvavyapi if only few have experienced god.
believing in god is subjective and still only a belief not fact
शास्त्रों का प्रमाण है - supported by/ proof in scriptures.
Babaji is not nonsense=babaji is nonsense😂😂
Hey can you please send a copy of the BINGO chart across?
Please debate with Qaisar Ahmad Raja
9:41 he said “ hamare pas shaster pramaand hai “ which means we have proof/evidence in scriptures.
If God does not exist is relative, like he says then God exists is also relative too
Iskcon sages and devotees are the shittiest of the lot. Great work Pranav. 👍 Request you to do a video on Jainism and their orthodox and pre-dated rituals. That religion is the most pre-dated in my opinion.
This guru has not seen that he is a fool.. that means he is fool. He is blind in absence of this knowledge that he is a fool. 😂
When guruji said (2+2=5) Not exists 😂
🤣🤣 define anything loosely without it's existence and say it exists. 🤦♂️🤦♂️
Drink gangajal every time he says "dekha hain? Nahi dekha hain".. you will die..
9:45 he said "sashtra praman" means proof from scriptures
09:45 hamare pass shastra praman hai means we have evidence of scriptures that he is saying.
so we have written evidence that harry potter exists so that means harry potter does exist
Bro, Pranav just asked in the video that what does he means I can't got it. So I wrote that he means this.
I don't support these babas bro.
And of course according to him Harry Potter Do Exists 😂
What does it mean by black and white in bingo ?
It means when someone offers a proposition with only two options to choose from while it's not that case
Yeah pranav according to him i believe in god=I do not believe in god
5:08 what is 'extraordinary' ? 😂😂😂
I would like isckon fanboys to read about Prabhupada’s views on rape and African Americans
Prabhupada bolega
Us ladki ne pichle Janam me jarur kuch galat Kiya hoga isiliye is Janam me usko r*pe ki saja mil rahi hai
Karma you know
😂😂😂😂
I THINK,
theism and atheism both are wrong. As human beings, we should be SEEKERS. If we do not know about something then ACCEPT that you do not know about it. It sounds very simple but not being hypocritical is very tough
he's saying god exists so it must follow that god doesn't exist (relatively) !
Prabhu padha 😂😂😂😂
Agh Prabhupada was no American immigrant he was Indian born in Kolkata
@hoomannaa
“Agh Prabhupada [...] he was Indian born in Kolkata”
=================
Yeah.
I think Pranav meant to say that Abhay Charan De was an immigrant into the U.S.
What is Agh, by the way?
Hey PPL,what do u PPL think of acharya Prashant?
Tries to rationalize his religion. But uses religion to propagate good ideas. Doesn't consider psuedoscientific claims made by his religion and interprets them differently. Overall a very nice guy.
he is the same as these iskon cultists
@@harsh9023he interpretes the meanings using allegory, symbols and metaphors. He is a philosopher, interpreting a philosophy. He's not a scientist. So your claim of him rationalizing religion is bogus.
So I can only say I don't have billions of dollars if I have billions of dollars 🤣
Shastra pramaan = Evidence in scriptures
He meant he have evidence of religious text aka Gita 😅
Iskcon never Understood Krishna. They only do Andha-Bhakti. Krishna is a Rationalist.
Yeah Krishna, the one who says rain happens because of yajna (not water cycle), the reason one gets birth as a woman, shudra or vaishya is sin, and no matter how bad your work is, you must stick to it because it's according to your Varna and Varna is one's nature from birth (all this shithousery comes from that book called bhagwatgeeta which acc to some people is biggest source of knowledge.), yeah very very rational!!😂
@@RR_theproaholeyou're cherrypicking and misinterpreting examples that suit your narrative. Krishna was a philosopher, not a scientist.
Your 1:40 view that either something exists or something does not exist is tricky. Nothing may have independent existence. A 6 feet guy is tall in comparison to a 5 feet 5 inches. A 6 feet guy is short in comparison to a guy with 6 feet 7 inches. Just if you see a 6 feet guy with nothing else then how do you define him? If in this existence there was just one guy then you would need a background to understand him. So he would have to exist in relation to the background.
You can’t define the attribute of ‘tallness’ but that doesn’t mean he doesn’t exist because again tall and short are relative terms while existence isn’t.
@@shashwatchamoli7221 even for something to exist it has to be in relation atleast if that something is measurable and limited.
@@shashwatchamoli7221 he definitely exists but not independently.
You didn't see the video at all.
He debunks this false analogy with the spiciness argument. And even without that, it is easy to see how this is not applicable to god.
@@harsh9023 who said bro and why such assumption that the video I didn't see. I was talking about an interesting topic at 1:40 and not that ISKON guys are right. Did I mention that ISCON is right!!! I personally know their cult.
I think... This Iskcon Guru is not Chutiya, it means 😂
@5agarDutta
“I think... This Iskcon [...] it means”
===================
In iskCON people, there is no illogical thinking. 😉
😂😂😂
Einstein would have attempted suicide if he saw this manipulation of relativity😂
Shakalaka boom boom not exist in reality le pandit it exist 😂😂😂😂
Bro shakalaka boom boom is real. Just because you haven't met Sanju doesn't mean he doesn't exist 😏😏
“Shastra Praman” means “Literature is Proof”.
I am a ISKON prabhu= I am 'saytan ka pujari' bc😂
In search of good comedy .... I came here.... But got migraine...😅
He is not an assho.. that means he is a...😂😂
Spot the bs
The fact is, some religious fanatics and atheists never stop using false analogies for God. 😂😂😂
Bro please make videos in Hindi
His logics are intolerable 😮
I'm not a billionaire = ?
This got you a little bit... I don't hear much refutations from your side on this.
Bro were u listening?
@@DDRational_ yes! i watched the whole thing. May be i was expecting too much from you.. More than you can give. Btw i'm not into iskon or something. It's just that atleast in my opinion it seems like you don't have much to say at the end of the video. ✌
@@cldkg he said enough, maybe ur brain is too narrow to understand this video. and dont lie about not being from ISKON, u clearly are a bhakt
Shāstra = Scripture
I say earth is flat other says not that means it exists 😂😂😂