Thanks for watching everyone! Help me out by supporting me on Patreon for scripts, discord, & name in credits, etc: www.patreon.com/thenandnow Get updates from me on Twitter: twitter.com/lewlewwaller
I think that the only thing I can add _here_ is that people would never back down from stopping GMOs let's say out of fatigue or loyalty to Monsanto. It's only once 'Government' even only verbally defends the rights _of_ Monsanto that people back down. You can rally your nation's folk against the people of *other* nations quite easily. Changing what people subconsciously perceive as "Their Own Group" is an entirely different matter. Are people in Britain willing to admit they made a mistake not stopping the Americans from torturing people at Guantanamo Bay? Then they'll also admit their own involvement in that war was a bad thing? No. Not while a single one of "Their Soldiers" who fought because we didn't have that perspective earlier is still alive. Change on the societal level requires a personal maturity that culturally, the West has turned away from recently. I don't think that they'll get it back any time soon.
I'd say it's the actually THE BEST channel on youtube. Given the topics that he discusses in the Kant and Spinoza videos.. and I think theirs one more..
Omg one banger after another! Jesus, ehat superb editing, screen writing, and aesthetic. Holly molly. Got a lot of goosebumps while watching this. I generally don't comment videos, but Jesus... What good art we have here.
My first association that came to mind while watching this video was the Spanish differentiation between "being" as something temporary ("estar"), and essential being ("ser"). If we want to change the world, maybe we have to think more in terms of the former.
Fantastic! A truly amazing train of though, sound and visuals. Feels highly important somehow. Thanks for making this and all your other content. If I will be a patreon to something one day it will be for your content. All the best.
This is my 3rd video on this channel and I'm planning to binge on all of the or most of the videos tonight. But what's bugging me is such a low count of subscribers. This is Gold.
In this sense I find myself thinking that some of the best sentences I've ever heard came from rappers. From the opening line of The Message "broken glass everywhere" to Black Thought of The Roots' "still they working all they life, they pushing for the light, giving everything they got to stitch dem swooshes on ya Nikes". One of the main reasons why I love hip-hop is because it emerges from abstraction AND the concrete.
Great observation. Killer Mike always delivers in that way and rap that addresses sociopolitical or just "political" things in general is on another level.
I only watched the first few minutes, but I just wanted to let you know, just like there are people who do not or even cannot think in images, there also also people who barely or don't use auditory thoughts. For these people, thoughts don't start as a sentence. They are able to comtemplate ideas without actual sentences forming in their mind. For these people, the start of a thought feels more like a spark rather than a formation of a sentence.
I just want to say how much I love your channel. I just stumbled across it recently and I really love the approach/presentation as well as the depth of content, yet still very accessible.
Ngl I got very excited seeing your typewriter, that literal notebook, and pens. Thank you! This is an awesome video. Made my day :) Also glad to see the Join button here. Clicked. Some months ago I made a comment about making it possible to contribute here in fewer clicks. Glad to see that, too. 👍
A wonderfully executed and formulated essay on life, reflection, action, inaction, identity and energy. So glad to have discovered this channel recently, I can only hope I might use some of the wisdom of this video to foster my own creative direction and motivation.
Sick thumbnail man. I'm a long time sub since uni when I first watched your video on Derrida. You do great work and I appreciate you being part of what I consider the very small minority of YT that succeeds at being educational, creative, relevant and often profound. Your videos have helped expand my thinking and knowledge, especially about philosophy.
Another thought: I think it adds greatly to your point to consider why people care about Judith Butler's writing being obtuse and hard to parse for laypeople. We don't expect mathematicians or physicists to explain their complex theorems in easy to understand languages. This would be simply impossible to do with any specificity. I think it reflects the fact that we view speech and language as more personal and intimate than the mathematical symbols used to express mathematical ideas. By further obscuring ideas behind symbols for symbols for speech, rather than symbols for speech, we have an understanding that the knowledge being portrayed is more specialized, more obtuse. We don't want to know or need to know. But when the ideas are expressed through language, we feel that we ought to be able to understand, no matter how "high level" the ideas.
Just found your channel. It took just one video and I’ve been binging ever since. Truly amazing content. What you are making is art. Go beyond, brother
Thank you! I am frequently frustrated with the slow rate of policies and structural solutions to combat climate change and ecological destruction: Life is in the verbs, and we all can do something. Thanks for an informative, and at the same time poetic, video. Keep the verbs flowing in your life ;)
I can see where you altered sentences, refining and sharpening the edge of your depiction. Very well played. Also, Butler's exemplary sentence is just gorgeous.. a spectacle-level show of rhetorical prowess. They knew she deserved an award, they just didn't know why, and it is understandable. They would have been dazzled by the semantic flash-grenade it becomes upon inspection.
beautifully put, thank you for these words, i do feel-glide what they express, they are healing. Wirte on friend, stretch yourself, so the sunwill of the spring warms a tickle ;)
On the butler quote: everything until “brought” is a single noun phrase. After brought, you have the predicate, until the appositional phrase begun by “marked.” So “some large conceptually considered situation” brought and marked “two large conceptually considered situations, different from the first and each other.” “Possibility” isn’t a verb. I don’t say that as a corrective, I say it as a note that you’re correct to note that Butlers verbs vanish, but that they vanish so much that you missed them. She is talking about something that “brought” and “marked.” Your point still stands bro. Sorry for the pedantry.
ah, excellent. keep returning to this topic again and again. thank you for all your work! and THANK YOU for being different and keeping it fan-funded - honestly cant watch another nord vpn, brilliant etc. ad...
Reminded me of "school of life" mission. The creator of it has faced criticism for deluding great philophers to a simple guidelines for everyday life. But as they stated that the believe in "democratising the intellectuals"
Incredible channel! I’d love to hear your thoughts on work, anti work etc, and what you think the future of work looks like. I’m sure you’re a David Graeber fan 😃
Anytime a point about accepting “difference” is made suddenly black people appear. We are more than a difference. We are not a tool for analysis but humans in their own right with stories that centre us. Tribalism is deeply embedded in us and very potent. Imagine if we lived in a world where being human is the ONLY thing that mattered to us. But would we be here if we were not tribalist? When do we stop and move past the caveman mentality? So many questions. I love your work btw and deeply enjoy your videos. So don’t take this personally lol
The problem is, while listening, I want to sit down and take notes. I am at work though. I do however imagine I'm becoming a better person, somehow, by listening.
Fabulous channel and videos. Concerning this one, what is ironic to me, is that the critiques of the abstract “pinned down” this is what be notions and perspectives are themselves only abstract ideas. Therefore they are susceptible to their own criticism and thus dissolution. All of these are Poststructural/Postmodern conceptions. I think one can argue factually that they’ve missed the mark of such intellectual undertakings to begin with. This is due to failing to notice something more significant than what the previous philosophies and the like that sought to set in stone or moor, as used in the video, what is, what be, etc. And that is, why they WANT for such a thing. Through all the past eras clear back to our species existing in the hunter/gatherer state, from the primitive spiritual explanations to the more developed pagan and religious, to the renaissance and romantic, to the enlightenment and modern, humans have felt the need to ground themselves, individually and collectively with such overarching perspectives and beliefs regarding truth on such a grandiose scale that they can’t know things as so on smaller more intimate scales. Yet, we still desperately require something to fill that void of what we can question but not rightfully answer. Wrong or right plays little importance to our subconscious regarding this, as it is rather for the sense of security, structure, and as much mainstay of an order as possible. The human psyche, for most anyway, require this in order for those verbs to become manifest, for people to act, “strike that match,” and so on. Aside from the innate curiosity to become familiar with one’s environment prompting action, to explore, even seek adventure beyond that out of the same type of motivation, most require such structural framework in order to act, including create. Of course there are the exceptions, the curious for curious sake with a stronger drive to explore deeper and further, such as those inventors, scientists, explorers, artists, wizards, and alchemists. And these so often seem to be the freer spirits, misfits, eccentrics, iconoclasts, and social critics. But throughout and according to history, these sorts have always been a minority exception, so to imagine all could be this sort to form mass society is just as delusional as any past set in stone type of belief peoples minds have been moored to. Only difference is those past ones could provide the structure needed for human coherence and achievement to occur, be it good or bad achievement, however you decide that, where the poststructural one won’t because it fails to take notice of why these overarching beliefs are desired.
I love Then & Now, have watched many videos. Was surprised to see "shift," "possibility" and "rearticulation" described as verbs. Of course, "shift" can be a verb, but it wasn't in this context. Nitpicky, eh? I'm afraid I don't really see how this illuminates the idea of changing the world, except perhaps in a tangential fashion. Certainly language plays a big role in the way the world changes, but the links between certain types of language and the effects they have on change don't seem to be well-articulated. There are other Then & Now videos that I find more intriguing and insightful...but that's just me!
I just wanted to add that making a sentence is not a trait only humans possess. Sure, we are the only literary species we know of, but animals use complex language themselves. Look at chimpanzees or certain birds for example.
What is a verb to you? I ask not to correct. In your Butler quote, I would consider all of your "verbs" to be nouns in the context of that sentence (including "thinking" as a gerund), and in your Dickens' quote, all your verbs to be adjectives. I suspect you're using a different definition of verb than the one I learned.
You've been getting better and better in presentation, but the quality of content unfortunately seems to go the other way. I absolutely loved your older videos, as were short and to the point, rather than poetic, ambiguous, general, and personal. But that's just my preference, considering how I think we can change the world.
I often find myself at odds with your political ideas, T&N, but your commitment to maintaining the connection between 'theory' and life is forever to your credit.
You should, if you haven't already, check out David Abram's Spell of the Sensuous and Becoming Animal. Though you sound like your taking a cue from Merleau Ponty anyway.
What facts backs up the statement that every action is unique and that how can a humble sentence change the world? This seems like poetry of opinions.. not only are there thoughts but also feelings; trauma, stress, et cetera.. Response?
every action is unique in so much as the world is in a state of becoming. You can repeat the same gesture a thousand times yet every time you do it it will be different from every other time. Any philosophy that doesn´t take time and movement into account is an incomplete one. Go read Bergson or smthn. As to your second point, it´s really easy to think of plenty of examples of humble sentences that have changed the world... Armstrong Landing on the moon: "One small step..." Plenty of examples in Marx which had a massive effect on the world at large... The bible, the koran, even The Lord of the Rings... It´s all a question of scale mate. Think even closer to home, maybe something your mother said to you as a child which affected you deeply... it changed your world, it made you move in different ways, think, feel and see different things, and by changing your world, in whatever minuscule way it also changed the world at large by way of relation, co-implication, affect... Put simply, any conception of existence which is not based on change and conceives of the world as separate discrete entities fails to grasp most of what makes the world interesting. You don't need scientific papers and statistics to show that, poetry is plenty...
@@MG-gl7gx I'm responding since I think it is fun to argue with you. Hope you think that too! Mainly I agree with you, however, of course, the world is more complex... How do we know it is humble sentences that causes change and not other factors? I know people who got inspired by seeing something, like, for example, they may get motivated to say work as a business owner by as a teenager seeing the business owner having a car key to a popular car brand, which somehow inspires them more than their inspiring speeches. "Any conception of existence which is not based on change and conceives of the world as separate discrete entities fails to grasp most of what makes the world interesting." This is a deductive statement similar to: "The sun has always rised. So it will rise tomorrow." If I hold myself to believe in empirism, I can never know for sure until I got it confirmed. As you know, the sun can sometimes not go up the next day. Also, everything is unique when no line to what is unique is drawn. I could write a copy, word by word, of the Harry Potter series. By the imaginative sense, this would be unique, while for the book publishing business it would be plagariarism. Is there any practical sense to time and space in thinking?
@@Keplaris Wonderful! I like this. I am, by profession, a narrative therapist, which means that I work with people in order to help them understand exactly how language, particularly stories, shape the way they conceptualize and respond to the world. Now obviously this doesn't mean that it's only language which has an effect on how they live, but it does mean that very often, in fact almost always, people rely on language in order to explain the events in their lives. Similarly to what is said in the video, narrative practice looks to find ways to complexify the stories people tell themselves about their lives and about the world (turn noun based stories into verb based stories for instance). An event (seeing the business owner with the nice car) isn't in itself a story, stories, like thoughts, are instead redoublings, attempts at organizing an event post factum into language. So to answer you, although affects (ways of affecting and being affected) can be many and multiple, it is often through language (humble sentences) that we ascribe meaning to them. As to your second point about the deductive statement. I disagree fundamentally, since precisely what I'm trying to say is that change is the only valid principle through which we can analyze a changing reality... Empiricism requires this kind of analysis in order to be useful precisely because "the sun might not rise tomorrow." Your very definition requires change in order for it to make sense. And lastly. You're right, there wouldn't be a "practical" point from a legal standpoint to copying Harry Potter. But this misses the point. The defense of difference as a value in itself is about affirming the creative capacity of the cosmos and all that inhabits it, it's a profoundly pragmatic and vitalist approach to reality since it allows us to conceive of the world as fundamentally maleable (within limits obviously). Deleuze and Guattari (both together and apart) are particularly useful here as they help us think of ourselves and our relationships as processes of differentiation and actualization rather than purely subject to external structures which (pre)determine what we can be. That was a lot, sorry for the rant hehe
Thoughts are not that important. A sentence is neither basic or foundational (Derrida101). Thoughts come from the gut; they also come from the material substrate of the life around us, call it ideology or lifeworld. What matters as Novalis, and German romanticism tells us more generally is the interrogation of things, through questions and contradictions. By addressing why Titian uses a particular blue in his painting one is forced to reach an understanding which, in turn, addresses and changes the infinite regress of signification in other things. As I noted elsewhere, what matters is to indice moments of contradiction, to brush back history like the hairs of a dog so they stand on end. It's not then that you start with an idea - rather you challenge accepted wisdom. The vague notion of "every day life" untethered from theory, for example. This way you have of not nailing down what you're seeking to say, Lewis, is increasingly performative: you have some sense of accepted normativity that is oddly reactionary; you harbour desires for a post-theoretical world embedded in the experiential like Schiller overlooking his domain. One of your less good essays, imo. Understand your position and state it
Hi please consider using less background music. Background music in UA-cam essays is difficult to listen to, especially for people on the spectrum, people who are hard of hearing, people who speak English as a second language, and others. A tiny bit of music goes a really long way. Thanks for considering.
Thanks for watching everyone! Help me out by supporting me on Patreon for scripts, discord, & name in credits, etc: www.patreon.com/thenandnow
Get updates from me on Twitter: twitter.com/lewlewwaller
I think that the only thing I can add _here_ is that people would never back down from stopping GMOs let's say out of fatigue or loyalty to Monsanto. It's only once 'Government' even only verbally defends the rights _of_ Monsanto that people back down.
You can rally your nation's folk against the people of *other* nations quite easily. Changing what people subconsciously perceive as "Their Own Group" is an entirely different matter.
Are people in Britain willing to admit they made a mistake not stopping the Americans from torturing people at Guantanamo Bay? Then they'll also admit their own involvement in that war was a bad thing? No. Not while a single one of "Their Soldiers" who fought because we didn't have that perspective earlier is still alive.
Change on the societal level requires a personal maturity that culturally, the West has turned away from recently. I don't think that they'll get it back any time soon.
The five "verbs" are not verbs.
This channel is violently, offensively good. The videos are extremely well researched and well produced. Keep it up
I love that description 🤙
I'd say it's the actually THE BEST channel on youtube. Given the topics that he discusses in the Kant and Spinoza videos.. and I think theirs one more..
And Bes. D Marx is another amazing, slept on new channel that’s gonna blow up
💯💯
Omg one banger after another! Jesus, ehat superb editing, screen writing, and aesthetic. Holly molly. Got a lot of goosebumps while watching this. I generally don't comment videos, but Jesus... What good art we have here.
My first association that came to mind while watching this video was the Spanish differentiation between "being" as something temporary ("estar"), and essential being ("ser"). If we want to change the world, maybe we have to think more in terms of the former.
Fantastic! A truly amazing train of though, sound and visuals. Feels highly important somehow. Thanks for making this and all your other content. If I will be a patreon to something one day it will be for your content. All the best.
I'll listen to this every time I want to write poetry
This is my 3rd video on this channel and I'm planning to binge on all of the or most of the videos tonight. But what's bugging me is such a low count of subscribers. This is Gold.
Simply genius. Such a joy to tune in, align, flow, be. Thank you 🙏
In this sense I find myself thinking that some of the best sentences I've ever heard came from rappers. From the opening line of The Message "broken glass everywhere" to Black Thought of The Roots' "still they working all they life, they pushing for the light, giving everything they got to stitch dem swooshes on ya Nikes".
One of the main reasons why I love hip-hop is because it emerges from abstraction AND the concrete.
Great observation. Killer Mike always delivers in that way and rap that addresses sociopolitical or just "political" things in general is on another level.
I only watched the first few minutes, but I just wanted to let you know, just like there are people who do not or even cannot think in images, there also also people who barely or don't use auditory thoughts. For these people, thoughts don't start as a sentence. They are able to comtemplate ideas without actual sentences forming in their mind. For these people, the start of a thought feels more like a spark rather than a formation of a sentence.
I just want to say how much I love your channel. I just stumbled across it recently and I really love the approach/presentation as well as the depth of content, yet still very accessible.
Ngl I got very excited seeing your typewriter, that literal notebook, and pens. Thank you! This is an awesome video. Made my day :)
Also glad to see the Join button here. Clicked.
Some months ago I made a comment about making it possible to contribute here in fewer clicks. Glad to see that, too. 👍
Wow. Brilliant. The words, imagery, music, pace, tone--all beautiful. A work of art. Thank you.
Beautifully said 🌺..
Beautiful!
I am in astonishment & wonder with your channel. I watch on repeat on purpose!
A wonderfully executed and formulated essay on life, reflection, action, inaction, identity and energy. So glad to have discovered this channel recently, I can only hope I might use some of the wisdom of this video to foster my own creative direction and motivation.
I immediately though about Candide seeing the thumbnail in my feed. We can, at best, cultivate our own garden, and our humble single thoughts
Magnificient. The ending was sublime, thank you and congrats for the great video!
More of this please just such a unique style with that voice and the atmosphere it’s nice
Sick thumbnail man. I'm a long time sub since uni when I first watched your video on Derrida. You do great work and I appreciate you being part of what I consider the very small minority of YT that succeeds at being educational, creative, relevant and often profound. Your videos have helped expand my thinking and knowledge, especially about philosophy.
I am learning so much from this channel, I just wanted to say a heartfelt thank you! 🙏
Another thought: I think it adds greatly to your point to consider why people care about Judith Butler's writing being obtuse and hard to parse for laypeople. We don't expect mathematicians or physicists to explain their complex theorems in easy to understand languages. This would be simply impossible to do with any specificity. I think it reflects the fact that we view speech and language as more personal and intimate than the mathematical symbols used to express mathematical ideas. By further obscuring ideas behind symbols for symbols for speech, rather than symbols for speech, we have an understanding that the knowledge being portrayed is more specialized, more obtuse. We don't want to know or need to know. But when the ideas are expressed through language, we feel that we ought to be able to understand, no matter how "high level" the ideas.
The sounds you chose are as well-articulated as the thoughts. This has given me a lot to chew on, as you always do. Thank you.
Watching this gives me some hope of having a nascent philosopher inside me. I already think like this!
Just found your channel. It took just one video and I’ve been binging ever since. Truly amazing content. What you are making is art. Go beyond, brother
The poetry of this piece moves me. Thank you!!!
Thank you so so much for this video. I'm going to have to rewatch it a bunch of times to take it all in because it's given me A LOT to think about.
"Joy is hope when it leaps and sprints amongst us."
beautiful man. philosophy is lived not taught. live the moments, moment by moment then you will be the movement
Wow! 'Thinking about changing the world' a tone poem by Then & Now. Beautiful.
Thank you! I am frequently frustrated with the slow rate of policies and structural solutions to combat climate change and ecological destruction: Life is in the verbs, and we all can do something. Thanks for an informative, and at the same time poetic, video. Keep the verbs flowing in your life ;)
4:32 When you need to reach a word count on an essay
Great essay, beautifully delivered and very enjoyable to follow.
Rare to find a Writer's Writer!
And rather than my reading what a Writer's Writer has written . . . here the Writer is present to me!
Nice!
~ For the algorithm ~
But seriously, amazing video. You always make me think, and I'm very grateful for that.
Kinda blown away by this one. One of my favourites from you, for sure, and that is saying a lot.
I can see where you altered sentences, refining and sharpening the edge of your depiction. Very well played. Also, Butler's exemplary sentence is just gorgeous.. a spectacle-level show of rhetorical prowess. They knew she deserved an award, they just didn't know why, and it is understandable. They would have been dazzled by the semantic flash-grenade it becomes upon inspection.
beautifully put, thank you for these words, i do feel-glide what they express, they are healing. Wirte on friend, stretch yourself, so the sunwill of the spring warms a tickle ;)
On the butler quote: everything until “brought” is a single noun phrase. After brought, you have the predicate, until the appositional phrase begun by “marked.” So “some large conceptually considered situation” brought and marked “two large conceptually considered situations, different from the first and each other.” “Possibility” isn’t a verb. I don’t say that as a corrective, I say it as a note that you’re correct to note that Butlers verbs vanish, but that they vanish so much that you missed them. She is talking about something that “brought” and “marked.” Your point still stands bro. Sorry for the pedantry.
Really love your channel, but this is the first I truly felt that I have to say it. Saved it to favourites.
This video made me reflect. Very impactful. Amazing Production.
ah, excellent. keep returning to this topic again and again. thank you for all your work! and THANK YOU for being different and keeping it fan-funded - honestly cant watch another nord vpn, brilliant etc. ad...
This is a truly wonderful video. Thank you.
Warm shower on a chilly morning my dude, great viddie!
I see your dense and wordy Judith Butler quote and raise you Nick Land. And then someone will see my Nick Land and raise me Reza Negarestani.
The piano background music is too loud .... annoying and hard to understand ...
The sentence 👀 is: "Change your self before you change the World 🌎. Live Life Now 🎯 The Future is Living Now!🤺
what youtube channel have I stumbled upon, this is brilliant!
That was lovely, thanks.
every video you make is a masterpiece
Thank you. 🖤
Reminded me of "school of life" mission. The creator of it has faced criticism for deluding great philophers to a simple guidelines for everyday life. But as they stated that the believe in "democratising the intellectuals"
just wonderful
Excuse me, what classical does this video use? It is very entrancing😌. Thank you!
Incredible channel! I’d love to hear your thoughts on work, anti work etc, and what you think the future of work looks like. I’m sure you’re a David Graeber fan 😃
Magical and poetic.
Would you revisit the words you identified as verbs and explain their "verb-ness" in the quotation from Butler. Thanks!
Beautifully delivered. The style of content that lured me in from the start. Thank you. -Profit Overlord
Anytime a point about accepting “difference” is made suddenly black people appear. We are more than a difference. We are not a tool for analysis but humans in their own right with stories that centre us. Tribalism is deeply embedded in us and very potent. Imagine if we lived in a world where being human is the ONLY thing that mattered to us. But would we be here if we were not tribalist? When do we stop and move past the caveman mentality? So many questions. I love your work btw and deeply enjoy your videos. So don’t take this personally lol
The problem is, while listening, I want to sit down and take notes. I am at work though. I do however imagine I'm becoming a better person, somehow, by listening.
4:13 Is it okay to neglect the tar though?
This is poetic.
It is a travesty that I have only found your channel today.
The only thing I have to say is: thank you.
Yo, great vid, yet the music is sometimes a little too loud compared to your voice! Thank you for your work!
This is beautiful.
11:09 Spanish has "estar" which is just for temporary states. He could use that as a replacement. Oh and I guess that means he's a Taoist too
Brilliant!
I was sentenced to a Julian Assange. It’s rich to be rich. Little boy, I found a foundling. My mother won’t have a womb. I am mother.
5:56 is possibility a verb in this vernacular or was this an error?
I always leave these videos more contented than I was before I saw them 🥲with a newer sense of purpose
Fabulous channel and videos. Concerning this one, what is ironic to me, is that the critiques of the abstract “pinned down” this is what be notions and perspectives are themselves only abstract ideas. Therefore they are susceptible to their own criticism and thus dissolution. All of these are Poststructural/Postmodern conceptions. I think one can argue factually that they’ve missed the mark of such intellectual undertakings to begin with. This is due to failing to notice something more significant than what the previous philosophies and the like that sought to set in stone or moor, as used in the video, what is, what be, etc. And that is, why they WANT for such a thing. Through all the past eras clear back to our species existing in the hunter/gatherer state, from the primitive spiritual explanations to the more developed pagan and religious, to the renaissance and romantic, to the enlightenment and modern, humans have felt the need to ground themselves, individually and collectively with such overarching perspectives and beliefs regarding truth on such a grandiose scale that they can’t know things as so on smaller more intimate scales. Yet, we still desperately require something to fill that void of what we can question but not rightfully answer. Wrong or right plays little importance to our subconscious regarding this, as it is rather for the sense of security, structure, and as much mainstay of an order as possible. The human psyche, for most anyway, require this in order for those verbs to become manifest, for people to act, “strike that match,” and so on. Aside from the innate curiosity to become familiar with one’s environment prompting action, to explore, even seek adventure beyond that out of the same type of motivation, most require such structural framework in order to act, including create. Of course there are the exceptions, the curious for curious sake with a stronger drive to explore deeper and further, such as those inventors, scientists, explorers, artists, wizards, and alchemists. And these so often seem to be the freer spirits, misfits, eccentrics, iconoclasts, and social critics. But throughout and according to history, these sorts have always been a minority exception, so to imagine all could be this sort to form mass society is just as delusional as any past set in stone type of belief peoples minds have been moored to. Only difference is those past ones could provide the structure needed for human coherence and achievement to occur, be it good or bad achievement, however you decide that, where the poststructural one won’t because it fails to take notice of why these overarching beliefs are desired.
Is it possible to read your scripts somewhere? :)
They’re not verbs that you circled! 😅Thanks for the video though, the quality has improved a lot recently. I’m always keen to watch them.
Excellent words (as usual), some good editing choices, but the rhythms of he music really syncopated will with the ideas on this one :-)
I loved this video! The music can be too loud and distracting somtimes, but great anyway! Thanks :)
Good shit 💯💯💯💯💯
Your Spotify link isn't working
I love Then & Now, have watched many videos. Was surprised to see "shift," "possibility" and "rearticulation" described as verbs. Of course, "shift" can be a verb, but it wasn't in this context.
Nitpicky, eh?
I'm afraid I don't really see how this illuminates the idea of changing the world, except perhaps in a tangential fashion. Certainly language plays a big role in the way the world changes, but the links between certain types of language and the effects they have on change don't seem to be well-articulated. There are other Then & Now videos that I find more intriguing and insightful...but that's just me!
Your best video
Where do you find archival footage?
In the archives
I want to create a world where rain never falls on streets in black and white neo-noir settings again! WHAO--WAIT 🤔
How am I supposed to write a true sentence when truth is merely the illusion of certainty?
Truth needs to be felt, not thought.
I just wanted to add that making a sentence is not a trait only humans possess. Sure, we are the only literary species we know of, but animals use complex language themselves. Look at chimpanzees or certain birds for example.
What is a verb to you? I ask not to correct. In your Butler quote, I would consider all of your "verbs" to be nouns in the context of that sentence (including "thinking" as a gerund), and in your Dickens' quote, all your verbs to be adjectives. I suspect you're using a different definition of verb than the one I learned.
one suggestion. The background track is too loud. Need to drop the volume. it's offputting
5:40
Typewriter?
great!
You've been getting better and better in presentation, but the quality of content unfortunately seems to go the other way. I absolutely loved your older videos, as were short and to the point, rather than poetic, ambiguous, general, and personal. But that's just my preference, considering how I think we can change the world.
I often find myself at odds with your political ideas, T&N, but your commitment to maintaining the connection between 'theory' and life is forever to your credit.
You should, if you haven't already, check out David Abram's Spell of the Sensuous and Becoming Animal. Though you sound like your taking a cue from Merleau Ponty anyway.
typo in the description: *Giles* Deleuze missing an L
All thoughts ultimately are put there from the outside.they are not indigenous
Pretty
What facts backs up the statement that every action is unique and that how can a humble sentence change the world? This seems like poetry of opinions.. not only are there thoughts but also feelings; trauma, stress, et cetera.. Response?
Thank you
every action is unique in so much as the world is in a state of becoming. You can repeat the same gesture a thousand times yet every time you do it it will be different from every other time. Any philosophy that doesn´t take time and movement into account is an incomplete one. Go read Bergson or smthn.
As to your second point, it´s really easy to think of plenty of examples of humble sentences that have changed the world... Armstrong Landing on the moon: "One small step..."
Plenty of examples in Marx which had a massive effect on the world at large...
The bible, the koran, even The Lord of the Rings... It´s all a question of scale mate.
Think even closer to home, maybe something your mother said to you as a child which affected you deeply... it changed your world, it made you move in different ways, think, feel and see different things, and by changing your world, in whatever minuscule way it also changed the world at large by way of relation, co-implication, affect...
Put simply, any conception of existence which is not based on change and conceives of the world as separate discrete entities fails to grasp most of what makes the world interesting. You don't need scientific papers and statistics to show that, poetry is plenty...
@@MG-gl7gx
I'm responding since I think it is fun to argue with you. Hope you think that too! Mainly I agree with you, however, of course, the world is more complex...
How do we know it is humble sentences that causes change and not other factors? I know people who got inspired by seeing something, like, for example, they may get motivated to say work as a business owner by as a teenager seeing the business owner having a car key to a popular car brand, which somehow inspires them more than their inspiring speeches.
"Any conception of existence which is not based on change and conceives of the world as separate discrete entities fails to grasp most of what makes the world interesting."
This is a deductive statement similar to: "The sun has always rised. So it will rise tomorrow." If I hold myself to believe in empirism, I can never know for sure until I got it confirmed. As you know, the sun can sometimes not go up the next day.
Also, everything is unique when no line to what is unique is drawn. I could write a copy, word by word, of the Harry Potter series. By the imaginative sense, this would be unique, while for the book publishing business it would be plagariarism. Is there any practical sense to time and space in thinking?
@@gabrielpetrouch What for?
@@Keplaris Wonderful! I like this.
I am, by profession, a narrative therapist, which means that I work with people in order to help them understand exactly how language, particularly stories, shape the way they conceptualize and respond to the world. Now obviously this doesn't mean that it's only language which has an effect on how they live, but it does mean that very often, in fact almost always, people rely on language in order to explain the events in their lives. Similarly to what is said in the video, narrative practice looks to find ways to complexify the stories people tell themselves about their lives and about the world (turn noun based stories into verb based stories for instance). An event (seeing the business owner with the nice car) isn't in itself a story, stories, like thoughts, are instead redoublings, attempts at organizing an event post factum into language. So to answer you, although affects (ways of affecting and being affected) can be many and multiple, it is often through language (humble sentences) that we ascribe meaning to them.
As to your second point about the deductive statement. I disagree fundamentally, since precisely what I'm trying to say is that change is the only valid principle through which we can analyze a changing reality... Empiricism requires this kind of analysis in order to be useful precisely because "the sun might not rise tomorrow." Your very definition requires change in order for it to make sense.
And lastly. You're right, there wouldn't be a "practical" point from a legal standpoint to copying Harry Potter. But this misses the point. The defense of difference as a value in itself is about affirming the creative capacity of the cosmos and all that inhabits it, it's a profoundly pragmatic and vitalist approach to reality since it allows us to conceive of the world as fundamentally maleable (within limits obviously). Deleuze and Guattari (both together and apart) are particularly useful here as they help us think of ourselves and our relationships as processes of differentiation and actualization rather than purely subject to external structures which (pre)determine what we can be.
That was a lot, sorry for the rant hehe
Thoughts are not that important. A sentence is neither basic or foundational (Derrida101). Thoughts come from the gut; they also come from the material substrate of the life around us, call it ideology or lifeworld. What matters as Novalis, and German romanticism tells us more generally is the interrogation of things, through questions and contradictions. By addressing why Titian uses a particular blue in his painting one is forced to reach an understanding which, in turn, addresses and changes the infinite regress of signification in other things. As I noted elsewhere, what matters is to indice moments of contradiction, to brush back history like the hairs of a dog so they stand on end. It's not then that you start with an idea - rather you challenge accepted wisdom. The vague notion of "every day life" untethered from theory, for example. This way you have of not nailing down what you're seeking to say, Lewis, is increasingly performative: you have some sense of accepted normativity that is oddly reactionary; you harbour desires for a post-theoretical world embedded in the experiential like Schiller overlooking his domain. One of your less good essays, imo. Understand your position and state it
I like the essay, but this was interesting too
This is the anti doomer content that I need
Well done, as usual. All a little too obvious though. But still inspiring.
Hi please consider using less background music. Background music in UA-cam essays is difficult to listen to, especially for people on the spectrum, people who are hard of hearing, people who speak English as a second language, and others. A tiny bit of music goes a really long way. Thanks for considering.
Turn the piano down