Guys help support the channel so we can continue to make higher quality content for you, go purchase one of our limited edition "Helms deep" Gaming desk mats = epicdesk.shop/collections/bellumethistoria
and was murdered by his own emperor as a "reward". Apollinaris later said. Sir (he meant emperor Valentinian III.) I do not know what your reasons are but I only know that you have just cut off your right hand with your left.
and was murdered by his own emperor as a "reward". Apollinaris later said. Sir (he meant emperor Valentinian III.) I do not know what your reasons are but I only know that you have just cut off your right hand with your left.
Aetius was an oustanding officer and commander. He was able to gather a sizeable force at the time and defeated the most dangerous enemy of Rome. After the battle he refused to destroy the remnants of the army of Attila knowing that it would cause trouble with Visigots in the future. He was that smart. He needed Huns as they prevent barbarians living in Gaul to attack Rome itself. Visigots and the others could not invade Italy as their rear would be open, unsecured and vulnarable to attack. History tends to repeat and some thing are obvious. Aetius was murdered by his own emperor and I really like what Sidonius Appolinaris said who was in Ravenna at the time later said. Sir (he meant emperor Valentinian III.) I do not know what your reasons are but I only know that you have just cut off your right hand with your left. There was no one capable to secure roman borders after that. Maiorianus was the last capable emperor was was captured and murdered by his colleague a "roman" general Ricimer. It was common in late roman army that barbarians held high ranks.
@@lancewilliams4190 As you know history doesn´t know if. If he had not been murdered he would have been able to retake North Africa with help of the Eastern Romans, that would have provided grain and gold to Rome. Economy would have been stabilized and Western roman empire would have been able to recruit more troops in order to retake Hispania which was occupied by Visigoths. Aetius´s son would have been emperor and I think Western roman empire would have lastet much longer...These are my predicitions based on knowledge of general Aetius. He was really capable man and he knew very well this: No taxe = no army. No army= no emperor. Simple Logic. Retaking North Africa from Vandals was a key factor to restore partially greatness to Rome.
Aegidius, a soldier in the army of Aetius and also a future general for imperator maiorianus also did well in securing Gaul but eventually all the gains of maiorianus and aegidius were nullified by the barbarian ricimer. Maiorianus even tried to retake africa from vandals but failed due to sea storms.
@@michalbock7648Aetius sacrificed Carthage, significant parts of Hispania, and gave away parts of Pannonia. When Britons requested help from the Picts, Aetius also ignored their pleas. He focused his policy entirely on Gaul at the cost of every other province of the Western Roman Empire. I don’t think Aetius actually cared about restoring the Empire as much as Belisaurius or Aurelian did.
@@DavGre It´s not that easy and I tell you why - Aetius didn´t sacrifice the North Africa, it was a general Bonifacius who invited the Vandals in the first place. Aetius was planning invasion to retake this wealthy and important province but he lacked forces. The western roman army was not able to fight on multiple fronts especially not without Eastern roman support. He paid Huns for their millitary help in Gaul and Pannonia was the form of payment. He sacrificed province that could not be hold for Gaul that was essential for Romans. If you wanted to conquer Italy, Gaul was the first province you should invade. That´s simle logic and Gaul was much richer than Pannonia with larger population and larger population means higher taxes and supply of the soldiers to the army. Romans withdrew their troops from Britain in 410, if I´m not mistaken it was general Stilicho who stripped the troops from the North to reinforce Gaul and Italy. Britons did request for help but Aetius lacked the forces. He was forced to form coalition with other barbarians to beat Attila. How could he send troops to Britania? You must study history of the late Western roman empire. Aetius did his best considering his poor resources.
In 25 years from the date of this battle the Western Roman Empire would be disolved, the emperor deposed, the legions disbanded or fell apart. It's incredible.
How did a great and mighty empire come to this? Perhaps this question will echo into eternity. The Romans with their superior ranks of legions, armory, weapons, army tactics, genius generals, untouchable capital Rome, were considered to be unmatched!
@@tshavfengvang7831as Italians, we were made aware since school that the Empire should have fallen in the 3rd century crisis. Cultural differences between east vs west, undefendable borders, shrinkage in demographic strength, the unsustainability of the economics of the State due to corruption, enemies advancing with new tactics or even tech, degradation of military ethics. Often what makes an empire fall are the same problems it had managed to stave off since birth. The army of Aetius was mostly foreigner, Rome couldn’t muster an army with the whole citizenry of Italy. The Empire has long declined, is what I am saying
I think it was agagerated a little the horseman the huns werent so great. Didn't the huns horseman lay dowm a barage of arrows and staying out of threat of legions until they were out of arrows except to roman cavery or one part to this battle you miss with Atilla the Hun command anyways great dispictions and animations of war of the times.
0:35 the map showing the Hunnic empire reaching the river Rhine is a bit misleading, don't you think? around 450 AD, the territory more or less effectively under Hunnic control was what is today's Romania, Hungary and surrounding areas up the river Danube. they made raids into more western parts of Europe but that is to be expected from a nomadic people like the huns.
Stunning video as usual! For the next several videos, you should do the Battle of Kadesh (1274 B.C.E.) and Suppiluliuma vs. Tausret (non-historical) for Pharaoh, the Battle of Artaxata (68 B.C.E.) and Carthage vs. Royal Scythia (non-historical) for Rome II, and the Siege of Milan (452 C.E.) and Vandals vs. Picts (non-historical) for Attila. As always, keep up the awesome work👍!
It is well known that Flavius Aetius defeated Attila in the battle on the “Catalaunian fields”. Many historians such as Mary Beard and Ian Hughes (the latter even wrote a book “Aetius the Retribution of Attila”) think so. According to most historians in the world, the Romans defeated the Huns and their success is indicated by such obvious facts as: 1) The city of Orleans withstood the siege of the Huns, which is why they were unable to capture it and attack another city, Toulouse. 2) During the battle itself on the Catalaunian fields, the Huns suffered heavy losses, which is why they retreated from Gaul. Due to this, the spoils from the battlefield went to Flavius Aetius and it became a symbol of his victory over Attila, Prosper of Aquitaine and Gregory of Tours wrote about this. 3) The Huns’ attempt to subjugate the inhabitants of Roman Gaul failed, since the Roman vassals Merovey and Chlodebaud became kings of the Salic and Ripuarian Franks!
Your content is so well executed. From the pace of the music to the aesthetics of the animation. Truly tremendous. Would you ever consider putting together one of the battles mentioned in the Iliad? I'm sure you could bring it to life better than any movie
Well done video! I am currently building 15mm armies that fought in that battle, using L' Art de la Guerre miniatures rules. Quite a mishmash of different troop types.
I once read some material on this battle that theorized the Huns abandoned a lot of their nomadic lifestyle by the time the Catalunian Plains battle took place, hence their forces mostly composed of infantry rather than cavalry. I never looked roo far into this to see if that indeed was the case but its something interesting to investigate for anyone here who decides to read up more on this battle. The Roman general Flavius Aetius was one of Rome"s greatest and amongst the last great Roman commanders; the emperor Valentinian's execution of him sped up Rone's downfall without a doubt, he could have been Romes last hope; this blunder along with Stilicho's execution.
Despite his unjust fate, Flavius Aetius saved what we now call the Western World. He stood up against fate and turned the course of history. As for other Romans, they destroyed themselves, but I would still like to see a world where Aetius saved his Motherland from the ultimate fall.
Nun ja ich denke nicht das die Hunnen zu diesem Zeitpunkt ihren Nomadischen lebenstiel aufgegeben haben. Zur der Zeit der Schlacht auf den Katalaunischen Feldern. Hat Attila sowohl von Oströmischen als auch vom Weströmischen Hof recht große Tribute verlangt. Und hat gleichzeitig mehrmals die Donau Provinzen gebrandschatzt was den für ihn positiven Nebeneffekt hatte das er immer wieder die Erhöhung des Tributs fordern konnte. Und als er nichts mehr aus den Balken rausholen konnte hat er eben einen Westfeldzug begonnen um Gallien zu Plündern, angefangen mit der Provinz Beatica. Das alles trägt die handschrift eines Nomadischen Kriegsherren der seine Anhängerschaft mit Belohnungen zufriedenstellen muss damit sie ihm nicht die Treue aufkündigt. Zumindest ist das die allgemeine Definition von vormodernen Nomadischen Gesellschaften. Dazu ist die Hunnische vielvöker Konföderation nach Attilas Tod relativ schell zusammengebrochen. Was ein weiteres Merkmal von Dezentralisierten Nomadenreichen ist. Und soseher ich Stilicho und Aetius als Fan der Militärgeschichte schätze. So halte ich sie doch für einer der Faktoren durch die sich das Weströmische reich am ende auflöste. Durch ihre große Einflussnahme auf die Altagsgeschäfte des Reiches. Haben sie die Fähigkeit ihrer Kaiser selber zu regieren erheblich eingeschränkt. Und somit die zentralgewalt der eigentlichen Regierung stark geschwächt. Damit haben sie einen Trend begonnen bei dem spätestens Militärdiktatoren wie Ricimer nach belieben gleich mehrere Kaiser auf den Thron und anschließend wieder absetzen konnten. Sogar fähige Männer wie Majorian. Der das Westreich beinahe wiederhergestellt und langfristig überlebnsfähig gemacht hätte wurde von Ricimer gestürzt.
Only if Aetius had lived 20 more years instead of being murdered by the Roman Emperor himself. Perhaps elevated to emperor status. 😢😢😢The fate of the Roman Empire would have been likely different at least in the second half of the 5th century and beyond.
The Battle of Catalonia had no real winner, but both sides suffered huge losses. The Hun invasion led by Attila was stopped by the Roman troops led by Aetius and their allies, but they failed to win. In 452, Attila invaded Italy and withdrew from the city of Rome only with the intervention of Pope Leo I.
No, there is a clear winner. Aeitius Won. The Roman goal was to defeat the Huns and drive them off the land. He won both the battle, and accomplished his goal. Attila raided Gaul: but left without his riches. The Baggage train was captured. And he lost the battle. He failed on this campaign.
Amit láttam előadást és olvasta, abban az volt leírva, hogy a Hun sereg ott maradt a csata helyszínén jól meggyepálva és egy szekérvárat alakított ki! Várták a támadást, de a Rómaiak reggelre elvonult! Azt is olvastam valahol, hogy a tartomány vezetője az egyik hadvezére lett Attilának, így meg aztán főleg hihető, hogy a másik fél nyert! Az ábrázolásról meg annyit, hogy a jelenlegi feltárások hazánkban, Orosz, Kazah, Ázsiában nem igazán támasztják alá, hogy a Hunok mongoloidok lettek volna, ugyanis igen elenyésző számban találnak a sírokban ázsiai típust! Még a keleti Hunoknál is az europid típus volt a többség!
Аэция позволил уйти Аттиле потому что сам когда-то жил Среди Гуннов и знал и дружил в молодости с Королём гуннов Ругилой - Руа а это был дядя Аттилы и Бледы с помощью Ругилы и Гуннов Аэций в молодости одержал несколько побед над своими врагами Аэция жил и рос среди Гуннов он был отдан в аманаты Короче там много переплетений Всё не напишешь Учите Историю и поймете почему да как и за что и почему так сложилось нууу итд. И конечно же Политика а также в своё время Аэция пользовался услугами Аттилы когда воевал с вестготами Короче всё как Я уже говорил переплетение Судеб и сильных личностей Каждый был силён в своём Амплуа в своей стихии Они испытывали симпатии Они испытывали Дружбу и Вражду они воевали и дружили и они знали друг друга сильные и слабые стороны Ну и конечно же Политика Вот объяснение почему он дал уйти Аттиле в свою очередь Аттила поступил бы также с Аэций не дал бы полного уничтожения и разгрома именно этого своего соперника Как-то так)
I am interested in cinematics and I wondered how you get the AI team to do what you wany or is it another player? If it is another player, does anyone know any tips if you only have ai to work with?
I am a military history student and son of a US Navy veteran and I am impressed by this presentation and story. It’s something I didn’t know about until I saw this. Attila was imposing and dangerous but the Romans and their allies were brave and victorious. The use of cavalry was the real game changer especially for the Romans.
Ha akkora vereséget szenvedett Attila, hogy a következő évben Róma ellen vonult seregével, de senki nem állta az útját ? Maga a Római püspök térdelt előtte, könyörögve, hogy kímélje meg az örök várost .... elgondolkoztató ez a tény ....
@@micksherman7709 Natürlich war die Römische Armee auf eine Ausgefeilte und umfangreiche Logistik angewiesen. Deshalb bestand. (Nach den Quellen die ich gelesen habe die sich wiederum auf die Notia dignitatium stützen). Ungefähr 20-25% der Spätrömischen Armee aus Kavallerie Einheiten. Bei den Hunnen handelte es sich aber um ein Nomdenvolk die innerhalb ihrer von ihnen beherrschten Domäne umherzogen. Und das was sie benötigten von Tributflichtigen Völkern erhielten oder Plünderten. Die Germanischen Gentes die Atilla bei seinen Feldzug nach Gallien folgten (Gepiden, Ostgoten) waren zu der Zeit ebenfalls zu großen Teilen Nomaden. Und bei den Ost und Westgoten ist es zumindest belegt das sie große Kavalleriekontigente einsetzten.
In this battle indeed the different germanic tribes killed each other mostly.Therefore the hun defeat was not too significant. Years later the hun civil war was much more determining for the hun tribes. They left Europe for a while, but later- few centuries later their descendants, the avars, and the hungarians came back to the Carpathian basin to Europe. From this point instead of looting other countries, they started to defend Europe from other eastern steppe nations, like the cumans, or the mongolians.
I want everyone to know that the descendants of the Huns are the Chuvash. It is necessary to study the data on language parallels better. The Chuvash language gives a hint as to who is the true descendant of the Huns. The Chuvash are the most peace-loving people at the moment, paradoxically. Such are the zigzags of history and this is a fact. Many people think that if they ride horses and shoot bows left and right, roam with yurts, etc., then they are the true descendants of the Huns. Absolutely not!!! Deeply wrong!!! "All that glitters is not gold." And the Huns are not just Huns, that is why they were able to survive these historical upheavals! Many peoples disappeared from the historical scene: these are the Avars, Khazars, Pechenegs, Polovtsians. The Huns did not surrender to China and migrated from destruction and assimilation to Europe and were able to survive in the Xiongnu-Hun-Bulgar-Chuvash nexus. Malalla!!! Shaposhar!!!
I thought Aetius chose not to resume the next morning because both sides were suffering from sheer exhaustion. As it was, Atilla struck his camp and left Gaul
En la historia de la caída de Roma perdieron varias legiones primero perdieron legiones Romanas en España Francia Inglaterra en los enfrentamientos con los ejercitos bárbaros y después Roma cuando enfrentó a Atila también Roma perdió legiones y años después cuando finalmente cayó el imperio Romano Roma perdió a todas sus legiones cuando los ejercitos bárbaros se enfrentaron cuando destruyeron a Roma en esa época el imperio de occidente tuvo más legiones Romanas que el imperio de oriente cuando se dividió a un así Roma dejó a un ejército de aproximadamente más de 600 mil soldados Romanos y los ejercitos bárbaros acabaron con todas las legiones Romanas en la historia de la caída de Roma hay el dato
check out Wargames Research Group (WRG) army lists, they make many of the rules sets used in competitive table top figure gaming. Their 6th Edition Ancient Rules and De Bellis Magistrorum Militum rules sets have accompanying army lists (4 books for DBMM) for hundreds of ancient and medieval armies, tracking changes in the same army over centuries in some cases. The lists give a much more detailed and rigorously-debated corpus on army composition than any other source I've seen. They've been arguing about this stuff for decades now so the latest lists are the product of much scholarly debate. I would recommend the DBMM lists since I much prefer those rules and the way they categorise troops, but opinions differ.
@@WarAndHistory. What do you mean "what"? The wings are run away, Atilla moved back he's chariot-laager,and waited all night.... The batle itself still on,all night.. Aitius left the battlefield on the day secund,Atilla about 5-6 days later.... As you see :You made a good one on false information..... Always the winners stay on the battlefield . Secondly Aetius grow up in King Ruga house ,(he was Atilla uncle,) He did knows:what you don't, like speaking Hun?/Magyar language, fluently,... Knowing the Hun force ,habits, power efficiency, (Horse archery, with reflex-bows,😄) (But is also true Atilla grow up in Honorius house as a "Prisoner of peace "😁) And after the batle with a fatal defeat in the wery next year, he (Atilla)shouldn't capable for a campaign untill Rome..... Where are the victorius Roman army? ... Our Chronicles are say differently, But ignored by the mainstream,
@@gaborjuhasz5610 Die Mainstream Medien berichten durchaus auch von den Ausgang der Schlacht wie sie ihn gerade geschildert haben. Und Außerdem diskutieren Historiker heute noch über das genaue Ende der Schlacht. Außerdem kann es wirklich sein das er das Schlachtfeld verlassen hat. Die Plünderungen der Provinz Beltica und des Alanischen Siedlungsgebiets reichten vermutlich aus um seine Anhängerschaft vorerst zufriedenstellen. Da braucht er die Schlacht gar nicht mehr vortsetzen wo doch das Risiko bestand dass des Patt sich doch noch in eine Niederlage verwandelt könnte. Außerdem haben alle Männer im Römischen Staatsaparat mindestens latain und Grichisch gesprochen. Weil man ohne dieses Maß an Bildung gar nicht zur in die höhere Gesellschaft hätte aufsteigen können.
И стоит оспорить то что по цифрам не соответствует истории- это про цифры которые в истории не соответствуют Датам и годам когда происходили эти битвы и сражения и числа (цифры ) не соответствуют ВЕКАМ которыми нас кормят ЛЖИВЫМИ Датами говоря про исторические ДАТЫ- ЛЕТА от РОЖДЕСТВА ХРИСТА - в истории не может быть ДАТ которыми нас кормили (ЛЖИВЫМИ цифрами и стертыми в ВЕКАХ забытыми СРАЖЕНИЯМИ войнами восстаниями и просто СТЫЧКАМИ - у них нет названия -как и сейчас ВНИМАНИЕ!- пример: развал страны РСфСР и СССР сколько конфликтов насчитали произошло и предшествовало развалу страны- сколько народу погибло- никто не считал! - кого уничтожали по заказу а кого просто уничтожали ради захвата богатств ( в маленьком или большом) понимании Село- деревня- город и СТО(100) лиц и у каждой страны есть самый главный и лицо которое управляет и разваливает но прихлеБАЕВ никто не считает Союз(Уния ) называется - из скольки букв состоит слово(Союз) из Четырёх- могу поспорить что значение и само слово состоит из Пяти букв но нам предоставляют слово как из ЧЕТЫрех и никто не обращает на слово СОЮЗ подразумевая (УНИЯ) тоже состоит из ЧЕТЫрех букв и говорят и ЛЖИВОЕ обманчивое слово СОЮЗ(УНИя) говоря про равенство ЦИфР тоже четыре - а вот и нет снова ОБМАН показывая ЧЕТЫре а НЕГЛАСНО показывают ВЛАСТЬ всего ПЯТИ в цифровом обозначении
How the Kommunikat if skool was no there, lol was habe die gemacht du verstehst das e 2024 ahahaa, how romans calculate a aquedukt with romans nr System without 0 lol
Guys help support the channel so we can continue to make higher quality content for you, go purchase one of our limited edition "Helms deep" Gaming desk mats = epicdesk.shop/collections/bellumethistoria
😢😢😢😢😢😢😢
😢
😢
😢
😢😢
Love what yous do.Thank you.
@@yaaadutwumwaa6223is 😢
no gladius's were used in the 5th century AD@@KeeKaiShee
you don't seem to be taking you're Loss very well@KeeKaiShee
Aetius wasn't only a professional soldier , also was a professional officer which know how to managing land's taxes , supply and populations .
and was murdered by his own emperor as a "reward". Apollinaris later said. Sir (he meant emperor Valentinian III.) I do not know what your reasons are but I only know that you have just cut off your right hand with your left.
Aetius was a gutsy soldier
I admire him.
and was murdered by his own emperor as a "reward". Apollinaris later said. Sir (he meant emperor Valentinian III.) I do not know what your reasons are but I only know that you have just cut off your right hand with your left.
@@michalbock7648 just shows the empire really was ready to die
The LAST of the Romans.
Both West and East Roman empires were hamstrung by internal conflict. It was catastrophic for the future of the empire.
As was Stilicho before him.@@michalbock7648
Aetius was an oustanding officer and commander. He was able to gather a sizeable force at the time and defeated the most dangerous enemy of Rome. After the battle he refused to destroy the remnants of the army of Attila knowing that it would cause trouble with Visigots in the future. He was that smart. He needed Huns as they prevent barbarians living in Gaul to attack Rome itself. Visigots and the others could not invade Italy as their rear would be open, unsecured and vulnarable to attack. History tends to repeat and some thing are obvious. Aetius was murdered by his own emperor and I really like what Sidonius Appolinaris said who was in Ravenna at the time later said. Sir (he meant emperor Valentinian III.) I do not know what your reasons are but I only know that you have just cut off your right hand with your left. There was no one capable to secure roman borders after that. Maiorianus was the last capable emperor was was captured and murdered by his colleague a "roman" general Ricimer. It was common in late roman army that barbarians held high ranks.
What if Aetius had not been murdered?
@@lancewilliams4190 As you know history doesn´t know if. If he had not been murdered he would have been able to retake North Africa with help of the Eastern Romans, that would have provided grain and gold to Rome. Economy would have been stabilized and Western roman empire would have been able to recruit more troops in order to retake Hispania which was occupied by Visigoths. Aetius´s son would have been emperor and I think Western roman empire would have lastet much longer...These are my predicitions based on knowledge of general Aetius. He was really capable man and he knew very well this: No taxe = no army. No army= no emperor. Simple Logic. Retaking North Africa from Vandals was a key factor to restore partially greatness to Rome.
Aegidius, a soldier in the army of Aetius and also a future general for imperator maiorianus also did well in securing Gaul but eventually all the gains of maiorianus and aegidius were nullified by the barbarian ricimer. Maiorianus even tried to retake africa from vandals but failed due to sea storms.
@@michalbock7648Aetius sacrificed Carthage, significant parts of Hispania, and gave away parts of Pannonia. When Britons requested help from the Picts, Aetius also ignored their pleas. He focused his policy entirely on Gaul at the cost of every other province of the Western Roman Empire.
I don’t think Aetius actually cared about restoring the Empire as much as Belisaurius or Aurelian did.
@@DavGre It´s not that easy and I tell you why - Aetius didn´t sacrifice the North Africa, it was a general Bonifacius who invited the Vandals in the first place. Aetius was planning invasion to retake this wealthy and important province but he lacked forces. The western roman army was not able to fight on multiple fronts especially not without Eastern roman support. He paid Huns for their millitary help in Gaul and Pannonia was the form of payment. He sacrificed province that could not be hold for Gaul that was essential for Romans. If you wanted to conquer Italy, Gaul was the first province you should invade. That´s simle logic and Gaul was much richer than Pannonia with larger population and larger population means higher taxes and supply of the soldiers to the army. Romans withdrew their troops from Britain in 410, if I´m not mistaken it was general Stilicho who stripped the troops from the North to reinforce Gaul and Italy. Britons did request for help but Aetius lacked the forces. He was forced to form coalition with other barbarians to beat Attila. How could he send troops to Britania? You must study history of the late Western roman empire. Aetius did his best considering his poor resources.
In 25 years from the date of this battle the Western Roman Empire would be disolved, the emperor deposed, the legions disbanded or fell apart. It's incredible.
How did a great and mighty empire come to this? Perhaps this question will echo into eternity. The Romans with their superior ranks of legions, armory, weapons, army tactics, genius generals, untouchable capital Rome, were considered to be unmatched!
@@tshavfengvang7831as Italians, we were made aware since school that the Empire should have fallen in the 3rd century crisis. Cultural differences between east vs west, undefendable borders, shrinkage in demographic strength, the unsustainability of the economics of the State due to corruption, enemies advancing with new tactics or even tech, degradation of military ethics. Often what makes an empire fall are the same problems it had managed to stave off since birth. The army of Aetius was mostly foreigner, Rome couldn’t muster an army with the whole citizenry of Italy. The Empire has long declined, is what I am saying
I think it was agagerated a little the horseman the huns werent so great. Didn't the huns horseman lay dowm a barage of arrows and staying out of threat of legions until they were out of arrows except to roman cavery or one part to this battle you miss with Atilla the Hun command anyways great dispictions and animations of war of the times.
I read"Slave of the Huns" as a boy,I loved it.
0:35 the map showing the Hunnic empire reaching the river Rhine is a bit misleading, don't you think? around 450 AD, the territory more or less effectively under Hunnic control was what is today's Romania, Hungary and surrounding areas up the river Danube. they made raids into more western parts of Europe but that is to be expected from a nomadic people like the huns.
I love late Roman history, thanks
There should be a full hollywood movie about this battle
Yess,.Then Hollywood could actually put their diversity garbage into a Realistic realm~
Is id int? Thats shade... but hey something about Atilla was filmed....
Attila in 2000 does a reasonable job
History is an important subject,it would only be write for the younger generations🎉
This is an awesome battle, i love seeing the ancient history battles
Stunning video as usual! For the next several videos, you should do the Battle of Kadesh (1274 B.C.E.) and Suppiluliuma vs. Tausret (non-historical) for Pharaoh, the Battle of Artaxata (68 B.C.E.) and Carthage vs. Royal Scythia (non-historical) for Rome II, and the Siege of Milan (452 C.E.) and Vandals vs. Picts (non-historical) for Attila. As always, keep up the awesome work👍!
damn visigoths allied with roman? didn't they fight against each other?
yes they did, but for this battle they allied against the Huns
The enemy of my enemy its my friend!
It is well known that Flavius Aetius defeated Attila in the battle on the “Catalaunian fields”. Many historians such as Mary Beard and Ian Hughes (the latter even wrote a book “Aetius the Retribution of Attila”) think so. According to most historians in the world, the Romans defeated the Huns and their success is indicated by such obvious facts as:
1) The city of Orleans withstood the siege of the Huns, which is why they were unable to capture it and attack another city, Toulouse.
2) During the battle itself on the Catalaunian fields, the Huns suffered heavy losses, which is why they retreated from Gaul. Due to this, the spoils from the battlefield went to Flavius Aetius and it became a symbol of his victory over Attila, Prosper of Aquitaine and Gregory of Tours wrote about this.
3) The Huns’ attempt to subjugate the inhabitants of Roman Gaul failed, since the Roman vassals Merovey and Chlodebaud became kings of the Salic and Ripuarian Franks!
bu bir yalan attila bu savaşı büyük bir üstünlükle kazanmış sonrasında papa , attillanın ayağına kapanarak özür dileyip istediğini vermiştir
Your content is so well executed. From the pace of the music to the aesthetics of the animation. Truly tremendous.
Would you ever consider putting together one of the battles mentioned in the Iliad? I'm sure you could bring it to life better than any movie
Thank you 🙏
The animation could be a whole lot better.....depends on available technology I suppose.
the cavalry charging scenes were awesome!!!
The savages really didn’t want to have education and running water, nor did they want to wash regularly, which is why they fought.
lol
ah~ Eternal Roma!
Aetius saves Rome only to be assasinated by the Emporer whose rear end he saved.
And that pipsqueak of an emperor was in turn assassinated by Aetius's servant.
16:28 damn that hunnic soldier went for the knockout
I hate attila as much as hitler, napoleon or william the conqueror.
Well done video! I am currently building 15mm armies that fought in that battle, using L' Art de la Guerre miniatures rules. Quite a mishmash of different troop types.
I'm not a big history guy but I can see how much they loved garlic. They even had a bloody battle to have a garlic field.
I once read some material on this battle that theorized the Huns abandoned a lot of their nomadic lifestyle by the time the Catalunian Plains battle took place, hence their forces mostly composed of infantry rather than cavalry. I never looked roo far into this to see if that indeed was the case but its something interesting to investigate for anyone here who decides to read up more on this battle.
The Roman general Flavius Aetius was one of Rome"s greatest and amongst the last great Roman commanders; the emperor Valentinian's execution of him sped up Rone's downfall without a doubt, he could have been Romes last hope; this blunder along with Stilicho's execution.
Despite his unjust fate, Flavius Aetius saved what we now call the Western World. He stood up against fate and turned the course of history. As for other Romans, they destroyed themselves, but I would still like to see a world where Aetius saved his Motherland from the ultimate fall.
Nun ja ich denke nicht das die Hunnen zu diesem Zeitpunkt ihren Nomadischen lebenstiel aufgegeben haben. Zur der Zeit der Schlacht auf den Katalaunischen Feldern. Hat Attila sowohl von Oströmischen als auch vom Weströmischen Hof recht große Tribute verlangt. Und hat gleichzeitig mehrmals die Donau Provinzen gebrandschatzt was den für ihn positiven Nebeneffekt hatte das er immer wieder die Erhöhung des Tributs fordern konnte. Und als er nichts mehr aus den Balken rausholen konnte hat er eben einen Westfeldzug begonnen um Gallien zu Plündern, angefangen mit der Provinz Beatica. Das alles trägt die handschrift eines Nomadischen Kriegsherren der seine Anhängerschaft mit Belohnungen zufriedenstellen muss damit sie ihm nicht die Treue aufkündigt. Zumindest ist das die allgemeine Definition von vormodernen Nomadischen Gesellschaften. Dazu ist die Hunnische vielvöker Konföderation nach Attilas Tod relativ schell zusammengebrochen. Was ein weiteres Merkmal von Dezentralisierten Nomadenreichen ist.
Und soseher ich Stilicho und Aetius als Fan der Militärgeschichte schätze. So halte ich sie doch für einer der Faktoren durch die sich das Weströmische reich am ende auflöste. Durch ihre große Einflussnahme auf die Altagsgeschäfte des Reiches. Haben sie die Fähigkeit ihrer Kaiser selber zu regieren erheblich eingeschränkt. Und somit die zentralgewalt der eigentlichen Regierung stark geschwächt. Damit haben sie einen Trend begonnen bei dem spätestens Militärdiktatoren wie Ricimer nach belieben gleich mehrere Kaiser auf den Thron und anschließend wieder absetzen konnten. Sogar fähige Männer wie Majorian. Der das Westreich beinahe wiederhergestellt und langfristig überlebnsfähig gemacht hätte wurde von Ricimer gestürzt.
Cool video, I love the story. Make a video about the battle on the Talas River, please.
Eventually
Only if Aetius had lived 20 more years instead of being murdered by the Roman Emperor himself. Perhaps elevated to emperor status. 😢😢😢The fate of the Roman Empire would have been likely different at least in the second half of the 5th century and beyond.
The Battle of Catalonia had no real winner, but both sides suffered huge losses. The Hun invasion led by Attila was stopped by the Roman troops led by Aetius and their allies, but they failed to win. In 452, Attila invaded Italy and withdrew from the city of Rome only with the intervention of Pope Leo I.
No, there is a clear winner. Aeitius Won.
The Roman goal was to defeat the Huns and drive them off the land. He won both the battle, and accomplished his goal.
Attila raided Gaul: but left without his riches. The Baggage train was captured. And he lost the battle. He failed on this campaign.
@@hia5235 The Huns were not defeated, they reached Rome the following year
Amit láttam előadást és olvasta, abban az volt leírva, hogy a Hun sereg ott maradt a csata helyszínén jól meggyepálva és egy szekérvárat alakított ki! Várták a támadást, de a Rómaiak reggelre elvonult! Azt is olvastam valahol, hogy a tartomány vezetője az egyik hadvezére lett Attilának, így meg aztán főleg hihető, hogy a másik fél nyert! Az ábrázolásról meg annyit, hogy a jelenlegi feltárások hazánkban, Orosz, Kazah, Ázsiában nem igazán támasztják alá, hogy a Hunok mongoloidok lettek volna, ugyanis igen elenyésző számban találnak a sírokban ázsiai típust! Még a keleti Hunoknál is az europid típus volt a többség!
another masterpiece!!
Huh, did not see that win coming. I was all set to lay a wreath for the fallen Roman Empire. Great job!
after this battle Atilla khan go tp Rome where is Pop Rome meet him
Horde sa istoka kao i danas..Evropa ce pobediti svakako
Аэция позволил уйти Аттиле потому что сам когда-то жил Среди Гуннов и знал и дружил в молодости с Королём гуннов Ругилой - Руа а это был дядя Аттилы и Бледы с помощью Ругилы и Гуннов Аэций в молодости одержал несколько побед над своими врагами Аэция жил и рос среди Гуннов он был отдан в аманаты Короче там много переплетений Всё не напишешь Учите Историю и поймете почему да как и за что и почему так сложилось нууу итд. И конечно же Политика а также в своё время Аэция пользовался услугами Аттилы когда воевал с вестготами Короче всё как Я уже говорил переплетение Судеб и сильных личностей Каждый был силён в своём Амплуа в своей стихии Они испытывали симпатии Они испытывали Дружбу и Вражду они воевали и дружили и они знали друг друга сильные и слабые стороны Ну и конечно же Политика Вот объяснение почему он дал уйти Аттиле в свою очередь Аттила поступил бы также с Аэций не дал бы полного уничтожения и разгрома именно этого своего соперника Как-то так)
Attila was a badass
Catalaunum is the distorted name of the province of Catalonia!
I am interested in cinematics and I wondered how you get the AI team to do what you wany or is it another player? If it is another player, does anyone know any tips if you only have ai to work with?
I am a military history student and son of a US Navy veteran and I am impressed by this presentation and story. It’s something I didn’t know about until I saw this. Attila was imposing and dangerous but the Romans and their allies were brave and victorious. The use of cavalry was the real game changer especially for the Romans.
Looks like someone got Hunned out to dry in this one…
lol
Excelente informe y animación, Congrats
What are your PC specs?
Nice Video
One of the most important battles of all the times .
For the algorithm
Hunlar bu savaşı kaybetmedi.Ama Hunlar bu savaşta istediklerini almadılar.İki yıl sonra Atilla Roma'ya girerek diz çöktürüyor..
Como ficavam os cadáveres de milhares de guerreiros??
The downfall of Attila, and shortly after the western Roman Empire
Indeed 😢
wonderful i love your historic battle vids on the roman empire, cant get enough
Ha akkora vereséget szenvedett Attila, hogy a következő évben Róma ellen vonult seregével, de senki nem állta az útját ? Maga a Római püspök térdelt előtte, könyörögve, hogy kímélje meg az örök várost .... elgondolkoztató ez a tény ....
Nice 🔥🔥
a great battle
Nice eye candy but historically baloney. Most of Attila’s forces were infantry.
Incorrect
It's a matter of logistics. See Ferill's The Fall of the Roman Empire: the Military Explanation.
@@micksherman7709
Natürlich war die Römische Armee auf eine Ausgefeilte und umfangreiche Logistik angewiesen. Deshalb bestand. (Nach den Quellen die ich gelesen habe die sich wiederum auf die Notia dignitatium stützen). Ungefähr 20-25% der Spätrömischen Armee aus Kavallerie Einheiten. Bei den Hunnen handelte es sich aber um ein Nomdenvolk die innerhalb ihrer von ihnen beherrschten Domäne umherzogen. Und das was sie benötigten von Tributflichtigen Völkern erhielten oder Plünderten. Die Germanischen Gentes die Atilla bei seinen Feldzug nach Gallien folgten (Gepiden, Ostgoten) waren zu der Zeit ebenfalls zu großen Teilen Nomaden. Und bei den Ost und Westgoten ist es zumindest belegt das sie große Kavalleriekontigente einsetzten.
In this battle indeed the different germanic tribes killed each other mostly.Therefore the hun defeat was not too significant. Years later the hun civil war was much more determining for the hun tribes. They left Europe for a while, but later- few centuries later their descendants, the avars, and the hungarians came back to the Carpathian basin to Europe. From this point instead of looting other countries, they started to defend Europe from other eastern steppe nations, like the cumans, or the mongolians.
This was amazing definitely earned a subscriber
Welcome aboard!
I want everyone to know that the descendants of the Huns are the Chuvash. It is necessary to study the data on language parallels better. The Chuvash language gives a hint as to who is the true descendant of the Huns. The Chuvash are the most peace-loving people at the moment, paradoxically. Such are the zigzags of history and this is a fact. Many people think that if they ride horses and shoot bows left and right, roam with yurts, etc., then they are the true descendants of the Huns. Absolutely not!!! Deeply wrong!!! "All that glitters is not gold." And the Huns are not just Huns, that is why they were able to survive these historical upheavals! Many peoples disappeared from the historical scene: these are the Avars, Khazars, Pechenegs, Polovtsians. The Huns did not surrender to China and migrated from destruction and assimilation to Europe and were able to survive in the Xiongnu-Hun-Bulgar-Chuvash nexus. Malalla!!! Shaposhar!!!
hahahaha
So the Franks fought along with Attila, and with Rome! 😂🤣
D'un côté comme de l'autre, ce sont majoritairement des Germains qui se sont battus, il me semble
What module is this used? Do you have any kind people to introduce it？
this was sick, thanks homie
I’m starting to think after watching this battle archers had to be the most hated
14:23 "...claim the throne as the rightful heir..."
ua-cam.com/video/HoR-W03tw7s/v-deo.htmlsi=I6xTVXPuEWDiGHxF
Tudjuk....we know 😂
I don’t know why but I’m getting PTSD from hearing that conch/bugle when the lines collide.
Teodorico el visigodo ganó esa batalla
I thought Aetius chose not to resume the next morning because both sides were suffering from sheer exhaustion. As it was, Atilla struck his camp and left Gaul
Actius was a valor in this war
Faulty images! Those helmet bushes were not used after 200 AD.
Incorrect
En la historia de la caída de Roma perdieron varias legiones primero perdieron legiones Romanas en España Francia Inglaterra en los enfrentamientos con los ejercitos bárbaros y después Roma cuando enfrentó a Atila también Roma perdió legiones y años después cuando finalmente cayó el imperio Romano Roma perdió a todas sus legiones cuando los ejercitos bárbaros se enfrentaron cuando destruyeron a Roma en esa época el imperio de occidente tuvo más legiones Romanas que el imperio de oriente cuando se dividió a un así Roma dejó a un ejército de aproximadamente más de 600 mil soldados Romanos y los ejercitos bárbaros acabaron con todas las legiones Romanas en la historia de la caída de Roma hay el dato
🔥🔥
Gut gemachtes video übergeschichte.
Rien à voir avec les "plaines catalanes", il s'agit des Champs Catalauniques dans l'est de la France !!!
Way to noisy
Brilliant
Various wargame lists give detailed troop types for the armies involved which could have added another level.
what do you mean?
check out Wargames Research Group (WRG) army lists, they make many of the rules sets used in competitive table top figure gaming.
Their 6th Edition Ancient Rules and De Bellis Magistrorum Militum rules sets have accompanying army lists (4 books for DBMM) for hundreds of ancient and medieval armies, tracking changes in the same army over centuries in some cases.
The lists give a much more detailed and rigorously-debated corpus on army composition than any other source I've seen. They've been arguing about this stuff for decades now so the latest lists are the product of much scholarly debate. I would recommend the DBMM lists since I much prefer those rules and the way they categorise troops, but opinions differ.
Second pin?
first. pin???
The last days of a dying empire 😢
Hungary is always! Atilla, Csaba, Aladár.
?
GABI = Roma! Magyar város! (etruszk) 😁@@rome5189
Aetius didn't win.
Atilla stayed in the battlefield.
what?
@@WarAndHistory. What do you mean "what"?
The wings are run away,
Atilla moved back he's chariot-laager,and waited all night....
The batle itself still on,all night..
Aitius left the battlefield on the day secund,Atilla about 5-6 days later....
As you see :You made a good one on false information.....
Always the winners stay on the battlefield .
Secondly Aetius grow up in King Ruga house ,(he was Atilla uncle,)
He did knows:what you don't, like speaking Hun?/Magyar language, fluently,...
Knowing the Hun force ,habits, power efficiency, (Horse archery, with reflex-bows,😄)
(But is also true Atilla grow up in Honorius house as a "Prisoner of peace "😁)
And after the batle with a fatal defeat
in the wery next year, he (Atilla)shouldn't capable for a campaign
untill Rome.....
Where are the victorius Roman army?
...
Our Chronicles are say differently,
But ignored by the mainstream,
@@gaborjuhasz5610
Die Mainstream Medien berichten durchaus auch von den Ausgang der Schlacht wie sie ihn gerade geschildert haben. Und Außerdem diskutieren Historiker heute noch über das genaue Ende der Schlacht. Außerdem kann es wirklich sein das er das Schlachtfeld verlassen hat. Die Plünderungen der Provinz Beltica und des Alanischen Siedlungsgebiets reichten vermutlich aus um seine Anhängerschaft vorerst zufriedenstellen. Da braucht er die Schlacht gar nicht mehr vortsetzen wo doch das Risiko bestand dass des Patt sich doch noch in eine Niederlage verwandelt könnte. Außerdem haben alle Männer im Römischen Staatsaparat mindestens latain und Grichisch gesprochen. Weil man ohne dieses Maß an Bildung gar nicht zur in die höhere Gesellschaft hätte aufsteigen können.
망치와 모루전술
Настоящее имя Атиллы, это Адыл. Это имя кыргызское, именно кыргызские племена из глубин Азии пришли в Европу.
И стоит оспорить то что по цифрам не соответствует истории- это про цифры которые в истории не соответствуют Датам и годам когда происходили эти битвы и сражения и числа (цифры ) не соответствуют ВЕКАМ которыми нас кормят ЛЖИВЫМИ Датами говоря про исторические ДАТЫ- ЛЕТА от РОЖДЕСТВА ХРИСТА - в истории не может быть ДАТ которыми нас кормили (ЛЖИВЫМИ цифрами и стертыми в ВЕКАХ забытыми СРАЖЕНИЯМИ войнами восстаниями и просто СТЫЧКАМИ - у них нет названия -как и сейчас ВНИМАНИЕ!- пример: развал страны РСфСР и СССР сколько конфликтов насчитали произошло и предшествовало развалу страны- сколько народу погибло- никто не считал! - кого уничтожали по заказу а кого просто уничтожали ради захвата богатств ( в маленьком или большом) понимании Село- деревня- город и СТО(100) лиц и у каждой страны есть самый главный и лицо которое управляет и разваливает но прихлеБАЕВ никто не считает Союз(Уния ) называется - из скольки букв состоит слово(Союз) из Четырёх- могу поспорить что значение и само слово состоит из Пяти букв но нам предоставляют слово как из ЧЕТЫрех и никто не обращает на слово СОЮЗ подразумевая (УНИЯ) тоже состоит из ЧЕТЫрех букв и говорят и ЛЖИВОЕ обманчивое слово СОЮЗ(УНИя) говоря про равенство ЦИфР тоже четыре - а вот и нет снова ОБМАН показывая ЧЕТЫре а НЕГЛАСНО показывают ВЛАСТЬ всего ПЯТИ в цифровом обозначении
Стоит правильно освящать в истории то что было стёрто теми кому выгодно извращение истории по всему миру
How the Kommunikat if skool was no there, lol was habe die gemacht du verstehst das e 2024 ahahaa, how romans calculate a aquedukt with romans nr System without 0 lol