Why Japan acquiring the U.S. made JASSM-ER is a big headache for China ?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 25

  • @thomasfyfield6756
    @thomasfyfield6756 11 днів тому +13

    Awesome missile hopefully they get the LRASM for anti ship defence too.

  • @verdebusterAP
    @verdebusterAP 11 днів тому +10

    Japan has both C-130s and Kawasaki C-2
    perfect candidates for the Rapid Dragon with the JASSM or even Japanese made missiles

  • @m_c_8656
    @m_c_8656 11 днів тому +6

    Wouldn't LRASM make more sense than JASSM-ER ?

  • @staplais18
    @staplais18 10 днів тому +4

    Software whats inside cost more then exterior.

  • @staplais18
    @staplais18 10 днів тому +2

    Money is services cost.

  • @AmskepticalTravelers-se8cr
    @AmskepticalTravelers-se8cr 5 днів тому

    16 missiles are for show and tell purposes. The sale afterwards is far beyond a mere "16", which isn't even a battery. Perhaps they meant 16 batteries encompassing 72 missiles each. That seems to be the minimum as far as any US missile sale.

  • @staplais18
    @staplais18 10 днів тому +1

    Every extension cost 100k a KM.

  • @Vlad-qu5mt
    @Vlad-qu5mt 5 днів тому +1

    You don't need an F35 for these missiles to work...
    Can make it happen with old planes...
    Can sink many ship with that JAGR Penetrator combo

  • @staplais18
    @staplais18 10 днів тому +1

    Because without that nothing happens properly. Overhead biy will of overseeing supervisors and boss legislation.

  • @AmskepticalTravelers-se8cr
    @AmskepticalTravelers-se8cr 5 днів тому

    US bases have nothing to do with independent Japanese purchases. US Base weapons purchases are determined by Congress, not outside purchases, such as Japanese airbases. Japanese purchases are offensive in nature and there are minimum purchase numbers. Defense manufactures are not about to load up normal US purchases lines with a foreign order. Foreign purchases are a separate production line.

  • @billwhite1603
    @billwhite1603 11 днів тому +5

    What are 16 missiles supposed to do?

    • @gutstompenrocker
      @gutstompenrocker 11 днів тому +2

      I was just thinking the same thing. They need 1600, not 16. Maybe take up Anduril on their offer?

    • @centurymemes1208
      @centurymemes1208 11 днів тому +7

      Its a start. It will grow.

    • @hyllstarter7090
      @hyllstarter7090 10 днів тому +3

      Well the 16 they buy this year will go well with the 50 they bought last year. So that will be 66.

    • @j.dunlop8295
      @j.dunlop8295 10 днів тому

      Reverse engineering? Clueless U?

    • @drewcroft6824
      @drewcroft6824 10 днів тому +1

      @@gutstompenrockerJapan bought 50 last yr

  • @TheDaysOfGlory
    @TheDaysOfGlory 11 днів тому +4

    Good, Xi needs the migraines.

  • @auro1986
    @auro1986 10 днів тому +2

    why does japan have to acquire anything when you have permanent base there since 1945? then south korea and others will ask for this also

  • @staplais18
    @staplais18 10 днів тому

    IBM = improvised binary missile.

  • @logicae4096
    @logicae4096 11 днів тому +2

    16? Not sure why they would bother...

  • @richvasquez8534
    @richvasquez8534 11 днів тому

    Bong