Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

CAPABLANCA CHESS

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 жов 2022
  • Featured is a brief introduction for the chess variant Capablanca Chess along with a 10+5 game I played against Fairy-Stockfish level 5 on pychess.org. I've only been playing this variant for a few days now, and it feels like it has been stretching my mind. Capablanca chess (or Capablanca's chess) is a chess variant invented in the 1920s by World Chess Champion José Raúl Capablanca. It incorporates two new pieces (chancellor/archbishop) and is played on a 10×8 board. Capablanca believed that chess would be played out in a few decades (meaning games between grandmasters would always end in draws). This threat of "draw death" for chess was his main motivation for creating a more complex version of the game.
    I'm a self-taught National Master in chess out of Pennsylvania, USA who was introduced to the game by my father in 1988 at the age of 8. The purpose of this channel is to share my knowledge of chess to help others improve their game. I enjoy continuing to improve my understanding of this great game, albeit slowly. Consider subscribing here on UA-cam for frequent content, and/or connecting via any or all of the below social medias. Your support is greatly appreciated. Take care, bye. :)
    ★ LICHESS.ORG lichess.org/@/...
    ★ CHESS.COM www.chess.com/... (affiliate link)
    ★ TWITCH / chessnetwork
    ★ TWITTER / chessnetwork
    ★ FACEBOOK / chessnetwork
    ★ PATREON / chessnetwork
    ★ DONATE www.paypal.com...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 194

  • @bencebalint1956
    @bencebalint1956 Рік тому +23

    I wanna call them nishop and rooght

  • @jamiemyxter67
    @jamiemyxter67 Рік тому +8

    Mind bending and fun to watch--enjoyed this one, Jerry.

  • @8ealer
    @8ealer Рік тому +3

    💙💛Thank you Jerry for sharing this gem. I had no idea that there's a website where I could play this variant of chess. So far - enjoying it a lot. Even playing against computer is much more fun than the regular chess, because the pieces are so tricky and combinations sometimes are just unpredictable.
    Also - big thanks to you and your work. I've been watching and enjoying your videos for many years already. Happy to see you still posting and also enjoying the game.

  • @onoff5815
    @onoff5815 Рік тому +2

    Easily my favorite videos from your channel are your commentaries, your variant games, and you analysis of master games. Thank you for all the fun and education!

  • @taakotuesday
    @taakotuesday Рік тому +7

    absolutely love the concept of archbishop and chancellor. seems like the value of the chancellor is about the same as a queen, similar to the relationship between knight and bishop. And archbishop is around a 6-7 (so better than a rook but not as valuable as the queen). Would love to see more!

    • @guillaumelagueyte1019
      @guillaumelagueyte1019 Рік тому

      I think the queen is still the most valuable just because it covers way more squares. I also suppose that a bishop would be more valuable than a knight on a 10x8, as it can go from one side to the other in 2 moves max while itqy take a knight up to 4 moves. Playing on both sides of the board seems just way easier than it be on an 8x8, with bishop vs. knight

  • @onurubu
    @onurubu Рік тому +3

    YES! I always loved your variant videos! Thank you for the great content as always Jerry!

  • @somewhere6
    @somewhere6 Рік тому +8

    Great to see. It definitely forces the brain into new territory that Fischer960 cannot.

  • @predragnikolic1259
    @predragnikolic1259 Рік тому +5

    Please make more videos about this chess..I was looking where to play it, now I now..

  • @Cant_find_good_Handle
    @Cant_find_good_Handle 5 місяців тому +3

    We need a Capablanca or grand chess random 5 d variant. Then we will never have to worry about opening theory being played out.

    • @liamartinproductions
      @liamartinproductions Місяць тому

      Until 2027

    • @Cant_find_good_Handle
      @Cant_find_good_Handle Місяць тому

      @@liamartinproductions sorry, I should have said it won’t be played out for non enhanced humans that are keep by the AI’s in the people zoo.

  • @dabadaba5847
    @dabadaba5847 Рік тому +2

    thank you for the video! i'd be really excited for more capablanca chess videos, or for more variant videos in general such as grand chess or other things on pychess. either way i have loved your videos over the years!

  • @glamdring27
    @glamdring27 Рік тому +6

    I enjoy playing Gothic (Trice) Chess online, which is similar, but with a different arrangement of pieces on the back rank. I really like the very logical extension the new pieces bring, given that a Queen is essentially just a Rook + Bishop already.

  • @peace_maybenot
    @peace_maybenot Рік тому +2

    This was fun. Cool to see almost going back to basics and looking at opening theory, stuff like that

  • @VilleMetsola
    @VilleMetsola Рік тому +42

    Do you agree Capablanca's prediction will come to pass at some point, and these more complex variations will increase in popularity, maybe even surpassing regular chess some day?

    • @vibovitold
      @vibovitold Рік тому +14

      I think they've gone as high as they could (since computers and internet made it easy for interested players to pair up, eliminating the need for custom chess sets etc.)
      for 99.99% players classic chess is as fun as it ever was, they don't experience "draw death" and don't memorize openings up to move 30.
      chess variants have ALWAYS existed. it's not like the classic one prevailed just because. it stood the test of time against countless competitors. it's like regular sex :) variants are there to spice things up now and then, SOME may swear by those,, but the default way won't go anywhere.

    • @IkesThePyro
      @IkesThePyro Рік тому +12

      No. 960 is slowly gaining momentum, but anything more than that will never go anywhere

    • @TruthAndReconciliation
      @TruthAndReconciliation Рік тому +7

      To an extent they’ll probably gain a niche following, but for 99% of people, vanilla chess is already extremely complicated.

    • @vibovitold
      @vibovitold Рік тому +5

      also note how the trend has notably shifted. these days there's fewer "radical" variants with fantastic pieces, non-standard board sizes etc.(like Caoablanca chess).
      960, which once seemed quite conservative (apart from the initial setup, all rules are pretty much preserved) became actually one of the more radical deviations in the current landscape.
      the variants people consider now are more like the ones proposed by Kramnik, tested with Alpha Zero: all the same but no castling... all the same but pawns can always move by 2 squares,... this sort of thing: very modest (if impactful) alterations of the classical ruleset.

    • @xwdarchitect
      @xwdarchitect Рік тому +2

      @@vibovitold yep, agree, and I think that’s for good. Smart men add, wise men subtract.
      960 looks to be the closest solution to the openings theory memoization problem though. No castling is just not enough.
      However I’d still simplify a few things in 960 to make it more practical in attempt to make it more widely used. E.g. fix rooks and kings in place to make castling obvious and only shuffle bishops, knights, queens.

  • @ADIEXS97
    @ADIEXS97 Рік тому +5

    Have you been playing any other variant? I would like to see you making videos on other variants, your commentaries are very insightful and your playlist on beginner to master was superb!!

    • @ChessNetwork
      @ChessNetwork  Рік тому +2

      Thanks. Yes, other more common variants yes like 3-check.

  • @miguelpanta
    @miguelpanta Рік тому +4

    that little giggle at 5:10 made me smile 😉

  • @karmaic8282
    @karmaic8282 Рік тому +2

    Thank you for this video! I've always wondered what this game was like ever since I heard of it in a book about Capablanca.

  • @Skry1880
    @Skry1880 Рік тому +1

    Love the variants, thank you . Please upload more of three check and horde!

  • @jacobmarineau6375
    @jacobmarineau6375 Рік тому +4

    I have a physical set of this, insanely fun to play, and the pieces are beautiful.

    • @landon8952
      @landon8952 Рік тому

      Where did you get it? I’m having trouble finding one for a decent price

  • @teolandon225
    @teolandon225 Рік тому +15

    Knook.

    • @misael8200
      @misael8200 Рік тому +2

      Knishop

    • @KF1
      @KF1 Рік тому

      Knook knook
      Who's there?
      Knishop
      Knishop Who?

  • @trout3685
    @trout3685 Рік тому +4

    This was very cool.

  • @Chris-cs7nv
    @Chris-cs7nv Рік тому +3

    I would like to see such chess variants gain more traction especially for computer chess as computers will draw so many games it's as if the game isn't complicated enough for them to struggle (although of course they do, otherwise they wouldn't lose)

  • @Twas-RightHere
    @Twas-RightHere Рік тому +7

    KNOOK! OMG ITS REAL!

  • @fiddleronthecube7835
    @fiddleronthecube7835 Рік тому +2

    Thank you for the video. I have the chess set and board from House of Staunton. I haven't tried to play the game. Years ago I asked a chess-playing friend if he would play Musketeer chess, but he said no because he thought chess was hard enough for him.

  • @richardfredlund8846
    @richardfredlund8846 Рік тому +2

    come to think of it that might be the first time I've actually seen a game of Capablanca chess played. Seen the rules explained .. but actually it makes much more sense in action. Was surprisingly enjoyable to watch, and there is this sense of space, which is quite interesting.

  • @SixNAC
    @SixNAC Рік тому +3

    very interesting new pieces

  • @nickcorrado5105
    @nickcorrado5105 Рік тому +2

    This was fun! I'd like to see another game sometime.

  • @relaxstation1871
    @relaxstation1871 Рік тому +1

    It’s the original Seirawan chess! Nice. I like this version and your break down and understanding of the play is fun to watch.

  • @KF1
    @KF1 Рік тому +5

    Now you can make Capablanca's Gun. It has more bullets pew pew

  • @stayedfaded
    @stayedfaded Рік тому +8

    Duck chess when?

  • @marshallrose8762
    @marshallrose8762 Рік тому +4

    anybody ever play capablanca/fischer combined? what a mess that would be...

  • @ryantrewitt3603
    @ryantrewitt3603 Рік тому +4

    cool variant. havent seen it before

  • @michael2244
    @michael2244 Рік тому +6

    4 way chess would be way better if you replaced the Knights with a Chancellor & Archbishop 🐴

  • @leontermolen2356
    @leontermolen2356 Рік тому +2

    Great video, fun variant :)

  • @miguelpanta
    @miguelpanta Рік тому +1

    intriguing. i found this on wiki as a basic orientation point. at least it gives a rough idea what to trade and what not.
    pawn 1
    knight 3
    bishop 3.5 (+0.5 for the bishop pair)
    rook 5
    archbishop 8.75
    chancellor 9
    queen 9.5

  • @drc77777
    @drc77777 Рік тому +1

    If you plan on playing more pychess variants I'd recommend Shogun Chess. It introduces the fairy pieces in a way I haven't seen elsewhere: the initial setup is just like regular chess, but you have the option of promoting pieces if you move them into the final three ranks, much like in shogi. The game feels a lot like regular chess despite all the new possibilities, it's kind of the best of both worlds.

  • @kingcrossy89
    @kingcrossy89 Рік тому

    Great showcase, mate! Really enjoyed seeing the strategy and early game observations

  • @endrawes0
    @endrawes0 Рік тому +2

    Could watch more of this

  • @sneakyknight
    @sneakyknight Рік тому +3

    At 13:14, can Nxa5 Rb2 be met by Nxc7 threatening Rxg7 and Ne6 ideas?

  • @MoonBurn13
    @MoonBurn13 Рік тому

    Excellent Jerry. Have been waiting for you to play some form of “Great Chess”. Good game, too, btw.

  • @markedwards9247
    @markedwards9247 Рік тому +2

    I enjoyed this format Jerry.
    Something different 😁

  • @AzureLazuline
    @AzureLazuline Рік тому

    I'd love to see more videos and streams of this, this is a really cool variant!

  • @sundaydsus
    @sundaydsus Рік тому +7

    That’s a Knook

  • @Molb0rg
    @Molb0rg Рік тому +2

    Didn't knew this one, interesting, indeed may go hand in hand witn regular ones

  • @sundenbock8571
    @sundenbock8571 Рік тому +2

    The opening issues looks very similar to Shogi, I like :D

  • @danielhanafin9885
    @danielhanafin9885 Рік тому +2

    Didn't even know this existed. Very cool. Gg wp Jerry

  • @user-BlackBear90
    @user-BlackBear90 Рік тому +1

    Super cool variation!

  • @mr.cook5
    @mr.cook5 Рік тому +1

    really enjoyed this, thanks jerry

  • @PerceivedREALITY999
    @PerceivedREALITY999 Рік тому +3

    Interesting variant. So many combinations. I'd like to see Alpha Zero play this variant.

    • @sam2725
      @sam2725 Рік тому +3

      I don't think it makes any difference if your watching stockfish or alpha zero, the moves will probably make just as little sense anyway

    • @clausable6328
      @clausable6328 Рік тому +3

      The bot that he is playing against in the video, Fairy Stockfish, is one of the strongest variant chess engines in the world. Its level 5, so it was easier to beat, but Fairy Stockfish level 8 would possibly surpass the best humans at capablanca chess. Its at the point where it even has its own neural networks (NNUE) for each of the variants it supports. Fairy Stockfish 14 combined with its neural network might surpass AlphaZero. I would really hope to see a matchup of AlphaZero and Fairy Stockfish like that, but I doubt it will happen.

    • @PerceivedREALITY999
      @PerceivedREALITY999 Рік тому +1

      @@sam2725 haha, you're probably right. But I still want to be amazed after some crazy combination : )

    • @PerceivedREALITY999
      @PerceivedREALITY999 Рік тому

      @@clausable6328 Obviously the machines play at a much higher level than any human mind. I would still be interested to watch, even if I can't figure out the intent behind every move.

  • @Aries61
    @Aries61 Рік тому

    Great narrative! Thank you!

  • @kenbrown438
    @kenbrown438 Рік тому +1

    @Jerry : I thought up two pieces called 1. The Prince and 2. The Princess !!!! They stand next to the Queen and King !!!! And can move up to three squares in any direction !!!! The board would expand accordingly , with 10 pawns !!!! .....................

  • @z3nish
    @z3nish Рік тому +1

    maybe 960 Fischer Random could also fix top level draw occurrence issue with traditional chess? i feel like 960 looks a bit more standard and could possibly attract more of the general chess population. To support my statement, right now there is 960 world championship with top level players competing, including Carlsen, Nakamura, So, Nepo, not to mention the other GMs

  • @pairot01
    @pairot01 Рік тому +1

    It sucks that the knights are farther away from the center, the now c and h files would be the ideal starting squares.

  • @bggines_1260
    @bggines_1260 Рік тому +1

    Looks like a cavalry kind of battle here🐴🦄🦓!

  • @callenkoester9078
    @callenkoester9078 Рік тому +9

    knook

  • @blackvx
    @blackvx Рік тому

    I really enjoy watching this kind of chess. Nice game! 👏 👏 👏

  • @johnrambler8034
    @johnrambler8034 Рік тому

    love you Jerry. Thanks for teaching us pure chess.

  • @fernandogomezpimienta338
    @fernandogomezpimienta338 Рік тому

    Estimados colegas del Ajedrez. Serīan tan amables de decirme donde puedo adquirir un Chess Set de 40 piezas, como lo sugirió JR Capablanca. Mil gracias!!

  • @parkerscanlon6784
    @parkerscanlon6784 Рік тому +2

    13:18 Axa5 should be possible because after Rb2 you have the shot Axc7. If rook takes queen you have Rxg7! Rxg7 Ae6#

    • @AsaniSywen
      @AsaniSywen Рік тому

      that is losing material: queen and bishop for queen and archbishop

    • @bantter1649
      @bantter1649 Рік тому

      Nice find!

  • @Frenzified96
    @Frenzified96 Рік тому +1

    Love this variant! Can you imagine the world's top players playing a Capablanca tournament? I would give one of my paychecks to see that

    • @vibovitold
      @vibovitold Рік тому

      that would kill the commentators, having no engine to analyze the positions.

    • @dabadaba5847
      @dabadaba5847 Рік тому

      i've always been so excited at the idea of top players playing OTB Grand Chess (10x10 variant similar to capablanca). I know it's not the same as capablanca chess but both would be cool on some level!

    • @yommish
      @yommish Рік тому

      @@vibovitold chess commentators got along just fine for many years without engines and some still do today. It’s actually more interesting when everyone watching has to figure out who has the advantage

  • @joeblor6328
    @joeblor6328 Рік тому +1

    Hello Jerry I am a Casual Chess Player but Have Accumulated More Than 500 Wins Against THe A.i. on Chess Pro on my phone At The Hardest Level With No Time Limits, How Could i Send u These Games 4 Analyses Maybe ????

  • @illowrenollow423
    @illowrenollow423 Рік тому +1

    Is the Knight/Bishop chimera called the *Krakken* ? Asking for a squid ;-)

  • @stephanschroeder1516
    @stephanschroeder1516 Рік тому +3

    Thank you for showcasing this site. Potentially interesting to have an AI to try and play chess variants against.
    Whatever happened to Omega Chess? That crossed my radar some years ago, but did not buy a board while they made them, sadly. Wish I had for the different pieces and board, even if it didn't exactly last as its own game.

  • @jacksonmcdonald5443
    @jacksonmcdonald5443 Рік тому +2

    Computer played bc7 as you were able to pick up a free pawn on c5 as recapture leads to queen check and then pick up the bishop on a5. Why the computer played ba5 in the first place is the bigger mystery hahah

    • @jayb9388
      @jayb9388 Рік тому

      My thoughts too. Free pawn. If not, lots of lost material. No obvious comp for stockfish

  • @davelukaszewicz908
    @davelukaszewicz908 Рік тому +2

    please post the link for where we can play this

    • @intrance96
      @intrance96 Рік тому +1

      If you type just 'pychess' in the searchbar you will find it immediately, it takes u like 5 seconds.
      You can find the searchbar on top of your internet browser.

  • @Entheos84
    @Entheos84 Рік тому

    5 seconds in and I am already excited! 😃

  • @jayb9388
    @jayb9388 Рік тому

    Did you consider 13. Bxc5? Winning two pawns from what i saw. Fun variant to play!! Gonna try this out soon

  • @brbcrew9957
    @brbcrew9957 Рік тому +3

    Hi Jerry it's everyone

  • @TymexComputing
    @TymexComputing Рік тому

    Yes ! Variant Chess has also reached to Jerry! Take a look at Gothic Chess ( flawless opening) and Seirevan Chess - they are similar :)

  • @SHARANUD87
    @SHARANUD87 Рік тому +1

    @8;33 ykin should have given check with queen then easily you could have attacked rook (black rook)

  • @cptnoremac
    @cptnoremac Рік тому +3

    12:52
    Can you take on g8 and then g7 here?

    • @Twas-RightHere
      @Twas-RightHere Рік тому

      Very nice

    • @wpt729fx
      @wpt729fx Рік тому

      You can but is an arch bishop more valuable than a rook + knight? I'm not familiar with this variant so I have no idea.

    • @cptnoremac
      @cptnoremac Рік тому +1

      @@wpt729fx I wouldn't think so. Plus you're getting an attack on the king.

  • @PushyPawn
    @PushyPawn Рік тому +5

    I think it helps your chess in a similar way that 960 does.
    Maintaining the stretchiness of your plastic brain.

    • @taakotuesday
      @taakotuesday Рік тому +1

      yeah it gives you experience with weird positions, meaning you can push for weird positions in your regular games

  • @Raddlesby
    @Raddlesby Рік тому +2

    If the queen is worth 9 points, the rook 5, bishops and knights 3, how much is the chancellor and archbishop worth?

    • @Aesculus1989
      @Aesculus1989 Рік тому

      8 and 6 (additive) would be sensible.

    • @dizzybananas
      @dizzybananas Рік тому +1

      @@Aesculus1989 Then the queen should be worth 8 points too. I haven't played yet but I'd guess 8-9 and 7 are more appropriate. Pieces that are part bishop benefit a lot from their counterpart by being able to visit both colors, so should get an extra point over addition. I'd guess there's some similar synergy for the chancellor as well

    • @scythermantis
      @scythermantis Рік тому +2

      8 and 7(.5) not 8 and 6

    • @denisdooley1540
      @denisdooley1540 Рік тому

      @@dizzybananas conventional chess has queens worth 9, Rooks 5, Bishops 3 and knights 3. I was trying to put it into that framework. I have also seen it argued that bishops are worth 3.5.
      However, I agree on the ability to switch colors being a major advantage and the inability of a bishop to do so is probably what limits them to only being worth 3 points in international chess. So, I agree that 7 is probably a better value than 6.

    • @Amethyst_Friend
      @Amethyst_Friend Рік тому

      @@Aesculus1989 Seirawan thinks it's more like 7 and 9

  • @the_drum_foxer5243
    @the_drum_foxer5243 Рік тому

    Since 12:17 to 14:02 he could’ve taken the rook with his Archbishop on H8. Then stock fish would’ve taken back with his archbishop and then you take the undefended night on H7

  • @esotericist9
    @esotericist9 Рік тому +1

    Gothic chess (or Trice's Chess) resolves the I-pawn weakness by placing the Queen on the D file, Chancellor on the E file, and Archbishop on the G file. That way, all pawns are protected by at least one piece at the start of the game. If select "Alternate Start" when creating a game on PyChess, you can select Gothic chess and other variants (e.g., Bird's chess).

  • @rookus
    @rookus Рік тому +2

    You win a piece with Nh5 at 13:00 maybe ?

    • @hhfilms892
      @hhfilms892 Рік тому

      The rook is defended by the archbishop though, I think Jerry just wanted no complications

  • @coulie27
    @coulie27 Рік тому

    Very cool !

  • @NKMedtner
    @NKMedtner Рік тому +1

    Can you take the pawn on c5 at 7:50 due to the fork of king and bishop?

    • @watteau6646
      @watteau6646 Рік тому

      looks like it!

    • @KralleZ7
      @KralleZ7 Рік тому

      black wouldn't take back with the pawn! bishop would go to b6 and forces a bishop exchange. whites bishop is way better and it is not worth the pawn

    • @watteau6646
      @watteau6646 Рік тому

      @@KralleZ7 But Bxb6 Axb6 is good for White. c5 is a good pawn that controls the center, and winning it also makes Black's d-pawn permanently backward. Totally worth trading bishops!

  • @electricangel1593
    @electricangel1593 Рік тому

    Does anyone know how to play against computer with handicap advantage on lichess?

    • @pepega3344
      @pepega3344 Рік тому +4

      Edit board with the handicap then continue from here -> play against computer

  • @AbanoubMG
    @AbanoubMG Рік тому +1

    I see the notification, I click!

  • @MrBennyC178
    @MrBennyC178 Рік тому +4

    A 10x10 board might be interesting too

    • @dabadaba5847
      @dabadaba5847 Рік тому +1

      "grand chess" has that! i think it's really well-designed, it's also featured in pychess.

    • @fep_ptcp883
      @fep_ptcp883 Рік тому

      It takes too long to get some action. Also the regular knights are slow and decrease in value way more than the regular bishops - pieces which can go across the 10x10 board in a flash

  • @don_pedrot.isreal7446
    @don_pedrot.isreal7446 Рік тому

    No words, my mind is blown. At one point I was like there's a free pawn here then I remembered there are "mutated monstrosities" on the board 😆😆

  • @dr.python
    @dr.python Рік тому +3

    It should’ve been 10x10

    • @CouchTomato87
      @CouchTomato87 Рік тому +3

      That would be Grand Chess then (also available on Pychess)

    • @dr.python
      @dr.python Рік тому

      @@CouchTomato87 no I tried that, only rooks are on back rank, I meant 10x10 instead of 8x10 shown here

    • @HatterTobias
      @HatterTobias Рік тому

      @@CouchTomato87 I have a weird idea, what if we also add centaurs (K+N) to the game? Would that be interesting?

  • @grandchampion7275
    @grandchampion7275 Рік тому +1

    Sadly, almost noone's playing on that website.

    • @dabadaba5847
      @dabadaba5847 Рік тому

      slowly it will gain more popularity

    • @HatterTobias
      @HatterTobias Рік тому

      @@dabadaba5847 it should be, there are a lot of amazing variants there

  • @nillinx1234
    @nillinx1234 Рік тому +2

    Would be really great if variants were played like variants and thought of as variants. Even in 960 people try a weird 'English' or whatever opening there is. Trying to turn the variant back into normal chess, which I suppose what the whole thing the variant tried to stop.

  • @StainlesssteelSinarLas
    @StainlesssteelSinarLas Рік тому

    Amazing

  • @mahmutbaysan8131
    @mahmutbaysan8131 Рік тому

    Chansellor is like a 2nd queen in power. About same value :)

  • @xwdarchitect
    @xwdarchitect Рік тому +2

    Seems Capa had a stake at a carpentry making chess boards. Otherwise how would you explain a 10x8 board? :$
    On a serious note, converting one bishop and knight to 1 kbishop and knook sounds like a more organic idea.

  • @diedrike863
    @diedrike863 Рік тому

    Chancellor & Queen are worth the same: 9 points. Chancellor (Rook + Knight) & Queen (Rook + Bishop)

  • @nozemsagogo868
    @nozemsagogo868 Рік тому +3

    looks like something from r/anarchychess

  • @collegewifi5024
    @collegewifi5024 Рік тому

    oo very interesting!

  • @sniffableandirresistble
    @sniffableandirresistble Рік тому

    Thats pretty wild ❤

  • @sam2725
    @sam2725 Рік тому +2

    14:40 Qa2 was more simple

  • @lordkiza8838
    @lordkiza8838 Рік тому

    Man I just found out about seirwan or whatever its spelled like now there's this?? And what the hell is duck chess?????

    • @dkelly
      @dkelly Рік тому

      I see we have a Rosen watcher. Me too!

    • @KralleZ7
      @KralleZ7 Рік тому

      and the variant: jumbo-chess. there is a camel, that can jump further than the knight 😅

  • @Noelll
    @Noelll Рік тому +1

    dont yell at me jerry

  • @chrishauser5505
    @chrishauser5505 Рік тому +1

    nice game. stockfish 5 is obviously not up to your level.

  • @othomile
    @othomile Рік тому

    Fun

  • @mmmmlemons
    @mmmmlemons Рік тому +2

    Jerry must have been on r/anarchychess this week 😉 the knook is so hot right now

  • @ghost79ish
    @ghost79ish Рік тому

    They should combine this with crazy house.... Lol. Jk, but this looks like a lot of fun!

    • @dabadaba5847
      @dabadaba5847 Рік тому +1

      i just checked, and they apparently do have that on pychess! they also have capablanca + 960, and capablanca + 960 + crazyhouse, and other variants with knightrook and bishoprook (grand chess and s-chess/seirawan chess).

    • @ghost79ish
      @ghost79ish Рік тому +1

      @@dabadaba5847 that's just crazy!

  • @nguyenquangminh4814
    @nguyenquangminh4814 Рік тому

    Didn’t Bobby Fischer say Capablanca’s chess had 2 kings? And that it was on a 10 by 10 board?

  • @watteau6646
    @watteau6646 Рік тому +2

    10:52 fxg6 wins a pawn

    • @D1A6NBA
      @D1A6NBA Рік тому

      How?
      fxg6 is met with Axg6 (A= Archbishop) after that f7 is double protected by queen and archbishop so that Qxf6+ can be blocked by Af7 or Qf7.
      fxg6 can also be met with ...Qxg6 covering f6 directly.
      Or am I lost somewhere?

    • @hhfilms892
      @hhfilms892 Рік тому

      @@D1A6NBA I think the idea is that after Qxg6 White would take the rook. So I guess Axg6 and Af7 would have to be played, but then White brings a rook to the f file and it is probably game over

    • @watteau6646
      @watteau6646 Рік тому

      @@D1A6NBA If fxg6 Axg6 the f-pawn is hanging and can be taken by the Q with check. Of course not ..Qxg6??, which hangs the Rook on b5!

    • @watteau6646
      @watteau6646 Рік тому

      @@hhfilms892 My point is that White can win a pawn, not win the game, with fxg6. He gives up one pawn, and gets 2.