Very Nice, thank you. I have studied the Fung Loy Kok /Taoist Tai Chi form for several years and always wondered how close it was to other Yang style forms. Our sequence is exactly the same. It's good to know this. Thanks.
For my own purpose (maybe others): part 2 starts at about 2:00 and part 3 starts around 7:00. Am mainly working on remembering part 3 right now, have been taking weekly step-by-stem classes in Palo Alto since March. Have come close to finishing it by following teacher but want to stand on my own.
Took me almost fr January to August to learn the entire sequence. Section 3, I had to break up into sections til I learned it. Now, if I let too much time go by without practicing I start to forget the sequence. I love the smoothness in which he moves from one movement to the next. This should be me goal now.
@@5877user , He does not MOVE with gratefulness or smoothly. His one leg is weaker than the other, sudden jerk motion. Pay attention if you r still learning.
Learning the sequence of moves is barely scratching the surface of tai chi, after you practice 1000+times then you will start to learn the form and the meanings of the moves. There is more to tai chi than learning the form...
I've watched a couple of Tai Chi 108 videos that were much slower, lasting 20-30 minutes. Still, I prefer the pacing in your video, even for private practice.
Always interesting to see another version of this classic form ... each lineage has some differences. For example - this one uses really fast kicks, and the Raise Hands position is to the front versus the corner. It's all about the energy and flow though and this one is a pleasure to see.
Joseph, Enuff with your theoretical mumbo jumbo that every one knows. The *wuwei* baloney... Just do your taichi routine for staying fit during pandemic.
I consulted this video often as I learned the form. There is great precision and, I would agree, considerable grace. For me, the speed (definitely one of the quicker versions) is not a problem. How fast one completes a form is generally irrelevant. And I have come to see that even changes in speed during many forms is expected and does not NECESSARILY detract from the overall beauty. But when changes in speed result in transitions that appear jerky and sequences that simply connect to rather than flow into each other, then there is a problem. Could it be that the stepwise connection, sans fluidité, is what I first saw as precision? And that this made it easier to learn the "parts"?
Beautiful, smooth, and flowing. Thank you.🙏☯️
J’ai fais le tai-chi taoïste moi aussi et je continu à 83ans..la meilleure chose dans ma vie !!
Been practicing the Wu form for many years. Just started a class in Yang. New learning. New flows.
Beautiful and full of grace, thank you!
Such style and grace.....absolutely beautiful...so is the music
Very Nice, thank you. I have studied the Fung Loy Kok /Taoist Tai Chi form for several years and always wondered how close it was to other Yang style forms. Our sequence is exactly the same. It's good to know this. Thanks.
For my own purpose (maybe others): part 2 starts at about 2:00 and part 3 starts around 7:00. Am mainly working on remembering part 3 right now, have been taking weekly step-by-stem classes in Palo Alto since March. Have come close to finishing it by following teacher but want to stand on my own.
Took me almost fr January to August to learn the entire sequence. Section 3, I had to break up into sections til I learned it. Now, if I let too much time go by without practicing I start to forget the sequence. I love the smoothness in which he moves from one movement to the next. This should be me goal now.
@@5877user ,
He does not MOVE with gratefulness or smoothly. His one leg is weaker than the other, sudden jerk motion.
Pay attention if you r still learning.
Learning the sequence of moves is barely scratching the surface of tai chi, after you practice 1000+times then you will start to learn the form and the meanings of the moves. There is more to tai chi than learning the form...
Beautiful form, very smooth and elegant flow. I definitely will watch this again and again to improve my technique.
Looks like the Yang form through the Tung Ying Chieh lineage.
Yes. You are right.
这套太极演示14分钟左右是快了一点，主要是视频不能演示太慢，架子比式是让看者更清楚了解架构。同套工夫有三种：1）表演化。2）大众化。3）自己私下练功。
就像我演示螳螂拳一样。功架都是比较软和比较慢。私下练就完全不是那一回事。视频只是供给参考。
I've watched a couple of Tai Chi 108 videos that were much slower, lasting 20-30 minutes. Still, I prefer the pacing in your video, even for private practice.
pero el que sea de referencia no quiere decir que no respetes las normas,coordinaciones
Absolutely beautiful Kathy england
Always interesting to see another version of this classic form ... each lineage has some differences. For example - this one uses really fast kicks, and the Raise Hands position is to the front versus the corner. It's all about the energy and flow though and this one is a pleasure to see.
Yah..🦋💜🦋
Très beau ❤
*So satisfying..😌🎐*
*Thank you master..😌🎐*
Please tell me the name of the music that is used during this Tai Chi video. Thank You
Gavin Turner it’s in the description. ‘Tai Chi’ by Paul Herzog
Absolutely beautiful
Why do you snap your kicks?
Foot work not actually well. Control and coordination among arms and legs movements not enough. overall is good.
Interesting use of large space
Is there a taichi group WhatsApp. please send link
這不是老架108式
是董氏太极（董英杰派系）杨氏架
madre mia que mal, el ser chino no quieredecir que sea un experto en lo que hace, pocas veces he visto una forma tan mal hecha
This only LOOKS like Tai Chi. This gentleman is " Doing " Tai Chi - stlye movement. True tai chi is " Not - Doing ".
agree
We are waiting for your better skills and knowledge displayed for us to comment on.
Joseph,
Enuff with your theoretical mumbo jumbo that every one knows. The *wuwei* baloney...
Just do your taichi routine for staying fit during pandemic.
Que voulez vous dire par « doing « et not doing?
What will you say with « doing »?
Je pense qu’il va trop vite...
I consulted this video often as I learned the form. There is great precision and, I would agree, considerable grace. For me, the speed (definitely one of the quicker versions) is not a problem. How fast one completes a form is generally irrelevant. And I have come to see that even changes in speed during many forms is expected and does not NECESSARILY detract from the overall beauty. But when changes in speed result in transitions that appear jerky and sequences that simply connect to rather than flow into each other, then there is a problem.
Could it be that the stepwise connection, sans fluidité, is what I first saw as precision? And that this made it easier to learn the "parts"?