What Does it Take to Make a Universe? - with Harry Cliff

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 354

  • @TheRoyalInstitution
    @TheRoyalInstitution  3 роки тому +67

    We are so pleased and honoured to have been able to launch our friend Harry Cliff's new book in our newly reopened lecture theatre!

    • @harshadadagale4253
      @harshadadagale4253 3 роки тому +1

      Is there any way I can know when was this lecture was conducted, I read the description but there was no clue about it.

    • @Ni999
      @Ni999 3 роки тому +2

      @@harshadadagale4253 Recorded 10 August 2021, now in the description.

    • @Ni999
      @Ni999 3 роки тому

      So happy to see the lecture hall again!

    • @harshadadagale4253
      @harshadadagale4253 3 роки тому +1

      @@Ni999 thanks

    • @ableone7855
      @ableone7855 3 роки тому +2

      Harry Cliff is one of the best lecturers you host at the Royal Institute. Smart, humorous and a very good scientist. Great style and presentation. Have him back soon, please.

  • @YankeeTankee
    @YankeeTankee 2 роки тому +1

    Harry Cliff takes on a difficult but very interesting topic. Well preaented! Thank you Ri!

  • @user-wu8yq1rb9t
    @user-wu8yq1rb9t 3 роки тому +51

    *Harry Cliff* is great, please record new videos with him.
    Thank you so much *RI*

  • @lordofelectrons4513
    @lordofelectrons4513 3 роки тому +6

    Apple pie recipe: Warm oven to 10^15 degrees add well ripened matter bake for
    9.3 billion years remove from oven allow to cool for 4.5 billion years then serve.

  • @mighty8357
    @mighty8357 3 роки тому +49

    Harry Cliff is such a fantastic lecturer! The way he talks and keep the attention of the audience is amazing to watch.

    • @nenmaster5218
      @nenmaster5218 3 роки тому +2

      Surely you agree on the random-but-truthfull comment
      that the Learning never ends, right?
      Well, with me, you have a person (not a robot, by the way) that loves to recommend
      science-youtuber and such. Soooo...

    • @Danoz_die_wreckt
      @Danoz_die_wreckt Рік тому

      He’s easy to listen to.

  • @marcusm6104
    @marcusm6104 3 роки тому +20

    One of the best communicators in science. Thank you!

  • @geeky_explorer9105
    @geeky_explorer9105 2 роки тому +2

    The best part of his lecture are he tells Stories and connects almost every beats of physics

  • @MichaelMonterey
    @MichaelMonterey 2 роки тому +1

    Uh, excuse me, but the CERN experiments left out a few prerequisites: 1 - a pre-existent source of energy, 2 - a pre-energy process for forming forms & modes, 3 - a pre-existing cause of the previous prerequisites (of existence & expansion/explosion), 4 - pre-existing forms, properties & processes that enable expansive/explosive action/reaction, 5 - pre-existing causes of motion, implosion, expansion/explosion, etc., 6 - pre-causal sources/processes to endow the tiniest forms of form with powers, etc., 7 - pre-existent principles & qualities of being that enabled & sustain everything, 8 - pre-natural causes for everything existing in a the tiniest possible point of nothingness in the middle nowhere, 9 - existential causes of a sudden expansion of nothingness to the size of a tennis ball then, without definite causes, to become an ongoing explosion of everything (at least 93 billion LY in diameter, so far), and 10 - a cause of belief in a SM QM cosmology that ignores the preceding 9 prerequisites of being, existence, AKA reality. >
    So, a real recipe for a universe of being, its nature & energy has to start with nonphysical thus changelessly reliable enabling principles.

  • @notayoutuber3518
    @notayoutuber3518 3 роки тому +13

    I had an emotional reaction when I finally understood the concept of quantum fields during this video. I had to remove my glasses from my face and cat from my lap and just absorb this for a long moment.

  • @but_seriouslyfolks
    @but_seriouslyfolks 2 роки тому +4

    Harry Cliff has become one of my favorite presenters. Thank you for all the presentations on this wonderful site. First class!

  • @pwincess747
    @pwincess747 3 роки тому +7

    Keep the Harry Cliff content coming please thanks 🙂

  • @shaheryaar
    @shaheryaar 3 роки тому +3

    what a lecture, what a lecture. An hour well spent.

  • @R037k
    @R037k 3 роки тому +5

    what an incredible amount of information must there be in those strange fields. just wow.

  • @rafaqathussain2131
    @rafaqathussain2131 3 роки тому +7

    Amazing job to share this incredible knowledge with all of us and to make it digestible for people like me who have little understanding of this highly advanced field of sience.

  • @lilianaordonez5474
    @lilianaordonez5474 8 місяців тому

    I watch his videos on my 81" TV, and it looks awesome! Thank you very much for breaking it down for regular people like me and my family. We are fascinated with his brilliant presenta, and we're learning a lot from you Mr Harry....

  • @hackcrew42
    @hackcrew42 3 роки тому +3

    Another Harry Cliff lecture, finally!! Live as well wow what a treat

  • @kevinmccarthy8746
    @kevinmccarthy8746 3 роки тому +4

    LOVE YOUR SHOW. GREAT SUBJECT. I saw your show concerning Particle fields, fantastic. Thank you.

  • @ableone7855
    @ableone7855 3 роки тому +6

    Great presentation by the lecturer. Look forward to more presentations by this presenter,

  • @kinnaribhalerao8112
    @kinnaribhalerao8112 3 роки тому +4

    Amazing! I'm an engineering student but physics never fails to fascinate me. Solace at it's best!

  • @germanpenn
    @germanpenn 3 роки тому +20

    I was between this lecture and “how to make a cliff” by Harry Universe. I’m glad I chose this one

    • @trupyrodice4462
      @trupyrodice4462 3 роки тому

      Lol, excellent. I wonder tho, what instruments, maths, and techniques were used to predict and detect the particles in a Cliff that Dr. Universe utilized compile his book. I suppose we just have to watch that lecture as well. Cheers

  • @jimbernard8964
    @jimbernard8964 11 місяців тому

    This lecture is solid gold! Thanks. I don't know the details of this but it seems a crying shame that the lecture hall seems about only half full.

  • @andreasgeorgiou5276
    @andreasgeorgiou5276 3 роки тому +37

    A very interesting talk. I think Democritus is judged a bit harshly since the man lived 2500 years ago. Very little of his atomic hypothesis has survived to be seriously assessed, but as with many ancient Greek philosophers whose admirable speculations on the natural world certainly marks the beginning of humankind’s enquiry, it is not so much what they achieved but what they attempted. If anything, successors to these early speculators are far more guilty for not taking up and developing the more promising of these early ideas. The Atomic hypothesis of Democritus is reportedly a very small part of his total output, which also included contributions in mathematics, ethics, politics, biology, cosmology etc. In any-case, it was 2000 years later before any real scientific process was made. Give him his due! This is not to take away any credit from John Dalton’s great contribution to chemistry.

    • @Dan-zq5wt
      @Dan-zq5wt 2 роки тому +2

      I had the same immediate reaction! I thought that was an unfair comment. Democritus was probably a genius. However, I do like this speaker!

    • @karthikshiva9801
      @karthikshiva9801 2 роки тому +1

      Taking nothing away from Democritus and his fellow Greek philosophers, it's a bit of a strech to claim that their thoughts & speculations marks humankind's enquiry 😂😂
      Lot of other cultures including some from the cradle itself started this exploration from way before

    • @andreasgeorgiou5276
      @andreasgeorgiou5276 2 роки тому +4

      @@karthikshiva9801 No doubt other cultures contributed to human knowledge, much lost to history. It is open to question, but it is generally accepted that this period in Greece marks the most important development in human enquiry.

    • @kurtgodel28
      @kurtgodel28 Рік тому +1

      It's fascinating how even the smartest people are overwhelmed by their national pride. He had to dismiss Democritus as a mere windbag and replace him by Englishman John Dalton, who lived more than two thousand years later. Amazing.

  • @humlakullen
    @humlakullen 3 роки тому +4

    Great... So, when does consciousness enter the picture in the evolution of the universe?

  • @qualquan
    @qualquan 2 роки тому +1

    This guy is the best explainer of current particle physics and admits our flawed concepts regards Higgs @31:45

    • @kurtgodel28
      @kurtgodel28 Рік тому +1

      He also explains how those flaws were addressed and fixed.

  • @RWBHere
    @RWBHere 3 роки тому +28

    How to make an apple pie from scratch: First make a universe.

  • @martenwillemhaven
    @martenwillemhaven 9 місяців тому

    Really great accessible explanation of complex matter with great enthusiasm!

  • @darrellee8194
    @darrellee8194 3 роки тому +1

    When I clicked I was hoping it would be back in the auditorium and it Is! Hooray!

  • @Bobbias
    @Bobbias 3 роки тому +10

    I remember watching the Higgs announcement live. I was amazed at how well I understood the presentations as a lay person. Witnessing the announcement live, seeing the graphs and realizing how long it took to answer that question made for quite an experience.

  • @briankepner7569
    @briankepner7569 2 роки тому +2

    The standard model idea makes sense to me but if I was a physicist trying to figure it out, in the same way that I repair cars I always tend to end up with important looking bits left over that I have no idea where they go. Sure the car will run but I do keep those bits in a box in the back just in case.
    Yes I'm not a physicist but I love these lectures

  • @RFC-3514
    @RFC-3514 3 роки тому +5

    11:02 - Well, if it "increased as the square of the distance", it would become stronger as they got further away, not closer. It's actually _inversely_ proportional to the square of the distance (and directly proportional to the product of the charges).

  • @sophiebarbara4111
    @sophiebarbara4111 3 роки тому +8

    When can we expect Harry Cliff in the RI theatre again?

    • @nenmaster5218
      @nenmaster5218 3 роки тому

      Surely you agree on the random-but-truthfull comment
      that the Learning never ends, right?
      Well, with me, you have a person (not a robot, by the way) that loves to recommend
      science-youtuber and such. Soooo...

  • @hassannabil9792
    @hassannabil9792 3 роки тому +4

    Excellent presentation. Thanks for providing it.

  • @MutsPub
    @MutsPub 2 роки тому +1

    Well done.
    Thank you.

  • @bryandraughn9830
    @bryandraughn9830 3 роки тому +9

    55:10*perpendicular
    Lol!
    This is so awesome!! Progress is happening after such a long period of hitting walls!
    LIGO and the James Webb telescope are going to provide much needed data. I might be able to witness more advancements before......y'know.

    • @harshadadagale4253
      @harshadadagale4253 3 роки тому +1

      Yes he said parallel but the rest of the talk was correct I suppose

  • @charlesaeneas
    @charlesaeneas 3 роки тому +3

    I'm making my way through the book which is extremely readable and makes more sense than most books I've read about particle physics or quantum mechanics. I am overawed by the sheer unwoldliness of it all!

  • @bipolarbear9917
    @bipolarbear9917 3 роки тому +31

    "The Cosmos is within us. We are made of star stuff. Star stuff contemplating the stars" - Carl Sagan

    • @super_ficial
      @super_ficial 3 роки тому

      A universe being created is not only redundant it is deliberately misleading. There is only Creation.

    • @AurelienCarnoy
      @AurelienCarnoy 3 роки тому

      Are you a body, or do you have a body?
      You are unfathomable. (Can't measure)

    • @super_ficial
      @super_ficial 3 роки тому

      @@AurelienCarnoy My ego tells me that I am a body, but I know better. I've seen four primary color and I've been aloft of my, 'Made the the USA' ephemeral body.
      I'm looking forwards to giving up this Ghost.
      (You sure know the right questions to ask).
      God bless and stand tall.

    • @lancenowlin1571
      @lancenowlin1571 3 роки тому

      P

  • @samsoneczek
    @samsoneczek 3 роки тому +10

    Fantastic! As always! Thank God for Royal Institution! Everybody need some magic in this strange world.

  • @Eztoez
    @Eztoez 3 роки тому

    I wish someone would text that bloke behind him to show a little respect to Professor Cliff and put his cellphone down. He's been looking at it the entire time.

  • @fastman119
    @fastman119 3 роки тому +4

    Love watching this guy's physics talks

    • @nenmaster5218
      @nenmaster5218 3 роки тому

      Surely you agree on the random-but-truthfull comment
      that the Learning never ends, right?
      Well, with me, you have a person (not a robot, by the way) that loves to recommend
      science-youtuber and such. Soooo...

  • @brettbrannon4775
    @brettbrannon4775 3 роки тому +2

    This was a great video and the speaker was even better at explaining and keeping it interesting😁

  • @michaeltaylor6133
    @michaeltaylor6133 3 роки тому +5

    Thank you very much, that was a very enjoyable lecture.

  • @colleenforrest7936
    @colleenforrest7936 3 роки тому +1

    About Inflation... What would be the difference between something happening really fast vs something happening at a slower rate but nothing or very little changed during that time and then fell off the horizon of what we could detect?

  • @lucyoldfield1578
    @lucyoldfield1578 3 роки тому +2

    I feel the likelihood of a multiverse is very real ⚡️🔥🌟

  • @canvey555
    @canvey555 3 роки тому +1

    Welcome back guys, great talk

  • @hamburgerlord9552
    @hamburgerlord9552 3 роки тому +1

    Great video🤘

  • @sonarbangla8711
    @sonarbangla8711 3 роки тому +1

    Indeed, to make an apple pie you need to make a universe. Maldacena (21st century Einstein) conjectured that the universe is a QC function, error correcting, coherent and deterministic, implying divine purpose (not Sagan's accident). And before you cook your apple pie, you need a finite axion algorithm, you will never get.

  • @mileshall9235
    @mileshall9235 Рік тому

    Nice little decoration in the background. Looks like Sol Lewitt.

  • @garydecad6233
    @garydecad6233 Рік тому

    Excellent presentation

  • @thewaythingsare8158
    @thewaythingsare8158 3 роки тому +1

    I am almost halfway through the book and it too is beautifully fluid and engaging - quite a skill for what you might imagine would be a very challenging subject.
    Am getting smarter by the page. Thought the cover was a bit naff so covered it with a Hubble deep field printout instead....might paste a mr Kipling floating in it later

    • @ihavefallenandicantreachmy2113
      @ihavefallenandicantreachmy2113 3 роки тому

      Put some "Pigs, In Space", in there, please. Just in time for Pigstmas! How about "Ren and Stimpy" and/or "Newt Gingrinch", just in time for Newt Year! Mr. Kipling wearing a William Shatner Rug? "Rugyard Kipling." No?

  • @asrajan55
    @asrajan55 3 роки тому

    How come there are no question answer sessions after these lectures like you have in the U.S?

  • @ranilany8646
    @ranilany8646 10 місяців тому

    Fantastic talk!

  • @Beroanimation72
    @Beroanimation72 3 роки тому +1

    So interesting for your presentation, thank you so much. Where can I buy your book?

    • @TheRoyalInstitution
      @TheRoyalInstitution  3 роки тому +2

      This will take you to your local Amazon - geni.us/harrycliff - but many independent book stores also stock it!

  • @Zorlof
    @Zorlof 3 роки тому +2

    Since the spectrum from antimatter is identical to matter, how do we know there are no antimatter galaxies out there?

  • @lumidoo8753
    @lumidoo8753 Рік тому

    Great lecture 👌

  • @taymazdizali1894
    @taymazdizali1894 2 роки тому

    Perfect for understanding the universe.

  • @aaronh.8230
    @aaronh.8230 3 роки тому +5

    So, is matter (actually, mass) just an emergent property of energy slowing down?

    • @rustycherkas8229
      @rustycherkas8229 3 роки тому +3

      If so, then we are all, basically, made of light!!
      Still doesn't explain why some are 'brighter' than others, though...

  • @rockfordlow571
    @rockfordlow571 6 місяців тому

    Great story but please slow the triple fast forward speedspeech by about 60% for coherence , if nothing else.

  • @gyro5d
    @gyro5d 2 роки тому

    Higgs field is the Inertial plane.
    Casimir Effect;
    Space and Counterspace, Electrons and Positrons are the plates,. The near infinite capacitance of the Inertial plane, attracts and repels the plates.
    Scalable Aether Universe!

  • @LairdJ56
    @LairdJ56 3 роки тому

    I want that book for Christmas 👏👏👏

  • @jasonprotell8976
    @jasonprotell8976 3 роки тому +2

    14:35 "when I was a PhD student, my office was in um, I have to be careful what I say because my boss is here, my office was in a windowless room underneath the men's 1st-floor toilets which frequently leaked, and the feeling of water dripping unexpectedly onto my head still gives me sort of panic attacks"
    I don't know if Harry Cliff is joking or being serious here, but that actually sounds miserable; if he's really having panic attacks, I hope he finds a good therapist.
    Anyway I'm looking forward to reading his new book. If it's anything like the lectures, it'll be an accessible, educational, and entertaining perspective on the recipe for the cosmos. Hopefully there are some interesting stories from LHCb as well!

  • @mikebellamy
    @mikebellamy 3 роки тому +3

    _"There is a whole bunch of other particles we don't really understand why they exist"_ means you don't understand the how the model works! So how can you be so sure you understand where it came from?

  • @reallyryan_
    @reallyryan_ 3 роки тому

    This was brilliant! :D

  • @pilotactor777
    @pilotactor777 3 роки тому

    Great immitation of Carl Sagan!!! You had me at that moment!!!

  • @oculosprudentium8486
    @oculosprudentium8486 3 роки тому +2

    In the Bible the book of Genesis, its recorded that the very first thing that God created was LIGHT.
    as a scientist, I read and understand that from the perspective of a master programmer initializing all the constants, variables, and arrays in the supercomputers.
    Also note that in almost every physics equations, the emissions of a photon are involved, possibly hinting that somehow the universe is made up of photons and sub-atomic particles related to them

    • @greggstrasser5791
      @greggstrasser5791 3 роки тому

      Science is run by those folks in the Bible.

    • @tom-kz9pb
      @tom-kz9pb 2 роки тому

      Postulating "God" does not resolve any conundrums; it compound them. A super-intelligent being is highly unlikely to simply exist without cause at the beginning of time. The traditional notion of "God" is not only wrong, but ridiculous, and it is certainly unscientific.

    • @greggstrasser5791
      @greggstrasser5791 2 роки тому

      @@tom-kz9pb
      You sound like those folks from the Bible.

  • @busyhive2346
    @busyhive2346 3 роки тому +5

    I always ask myself how is it even possible that our teachers are able to make science such a boring subject - there is nothing more exciting than science as a subject - it should be a mandatory subject - it represents the “ language of our existence” .

    • @manmarvel
      @manmarvel 3 роки тому

      Schools within imperial systems capitalists or not are not made to educate you they’re made to make you good workers. They’re there to get you used to suffering. That’s why I have you look at most famous scientist there either a the children of rich people or they had some really important mentor in their life on top of being smart(lucky)

    • @loftsatsympaticodotc
      @loftsatsympaticodotc 3 роки тому +1

      @@manmarvel This dystopian view is hard to digest; i.e. not true whatsoever! As someone who spent 20 years studying at 4 different institutions, this could not be further from the truth. In deed the liberal arts schools do not emphasize practical trades. If you want to become a blacksmith, or plumber, or "put-part-A-into-hole-B" production line worker,, the LAST place you would find this is our universities or even high schools. You are maybe thinking of a 'trade school'? Even there the mysterires of material science are well displayed for analysis.

    • @manmarvel
      @manmarvel 3 роки тому

      @@loftsatsympaticodotc i dont know man, i think were talking like elementary middle and highschool here.

    • @manmarvel
      @manmarvel 3 роки тому

      by the time your in college you ususally love what you are learning.

    • @manmarvel
      @manmarvel 3 роки тому

      @@loftsatsympaticodotc problem is most people never fall in love with learning, hence my 1st comment.

  • @afriedrich1452
    @afriedrich1452 3 роки тому +1

    I seems that physicists were not computing the properties of the muon correctly in the past. This seems to explain the g-2 anomaly and may also explain the LHCb anomaly.

  • @LeonidKornikov
    @LeonidKornikov 3 роки тому +1

    Very interesting, thank you.

  • @bigbear7567
    @bigbear7567 3 роки тому

    Very entertaining and interesting video.

  • @matthewdolan5831
    @matthewdolan5831 3 роки тому

    Nice one 👍

  • @gyro5d
    @gyro5d 2 роки тому

    From the near infinite capacitance of the Inertial plane out the electron vortex. Pulses from Counterspace create shells of tau, muon, electron.
    "The smaller the spacial footprint, the higher the capacitance."
    "The higher the gauss, the smaller its field."

  • @TheJesusr1
    @TheJesusr1 3 роки тому +1

    Excellent presenter!

  • @euclidofalexandria3786
    @euclidofalexandria3786 Рік тому

    9:02 secs do photons have a veeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeery small mass? complexity thresholds and coalescence of slowed light into matter. Compactification can be seen in the 5 fundamental nodes of plasma movement... compactification of enegy and volume can be studied and foresite can be used as well...

  • @fruitysfajs
    @fruitysfajs 3 роки тому +1

    Sorry, it was interesting until minute 13:30 ... "Beetlejuice is about 10x larger than our sun" ??? It is about 950x larger than our sun! Really struggling to watch further honestly. I am not even an amateur. How can someone lecturing on the RI make such a mistake? Ignorance?

    • @fruitysfajs
      @fruitysfajs 3 роки тому

      ... sorry ... taking a step back ... he is a good Particle Physicist ... just not that great of an Astro Physicist ;) I admit it gets interesting when he is talking about his real stuff ;)

  • @charlesandrews2419
    @charlesandrews2419 3 роки тому

    Food for thought...
    As we ponder the recipe for the universe.
    We are all star stuff.

  • @ilymortygivegrandpaakiss5231
    @ilymortygivegrandpaakiss5231 3 роки тому +2

    Wonderful 🍎

  • @zerodivider4333
    @zerodivider4333 3 роки тому

    Back in the lecture theater. Woot woot.

  • @NickAbbot.
    @NickAbbot. 2 роки тому

    @44:00 Indirectly, he refers to gravity as a force.

  • @tresajessygeorge210
    @tresajessygeorge210 Рік тому

    THANK YOU...!!!

  • @strikkmoez
    @strikkmoez 3 роки тому

    Amazing talk.

  • @euclidofalexandria3786
    @euclidofalexandria3786 Рік тому

    remember too that radiation can be due to internal complexity, and / or surface complexity upon a knot, diffable not continuuous however...
    its both, especially under different scaling lengths.

  • @zoozolplexOne
    @zoozolplexOne Рік тому

    Very good talk

  • @bad-bunnyblogger8171
    @bad-bunnyblogger8171 2 роки тому +1

    If nothing exists to observe a universe. Does the universe cease to exist.
    Maybe life and consciousness plays a bigger role?

  • @Doortodoorgeek
    @Doortodoorgeek 3 місяці тому

    ohhhhh it drove me nuts he said parallel and not perpendicular, lol I am crazy, it digs into me so deep only because I know that he knows what he saw in his brain versus what he actually said was not the same
    I only care so much because 99.9999% everything else he said was accurate and very very well presented, this was 1% away from being the perfect RI lecture I have seen
    Great job Gary, please keep publishing your stuff for free
    Why can I not easily tag someone in the video in my comments .......... youtube

  • @ngDetecter
    @ngDetecter Рік тому

    generous introduction: 0:00
    😁

  • @RupertBruce
    @RupertBruce 3 роки тому +1

    So the Higgs Field distorts space time that then distorts the path of photons even though photons are not affected by the Higgs Field themselves?

    • @luciddewseed3095
      @luciddewseed3095 3 роки тому

      yups

    • @radishpineapple74
      @radishpineapple74 3 роки тому +5

      Any kind of confined interaction represents mass. A photon has no rest mass, but if you put it into a perfect mirrored box, then even though it's bouncing around at the speed of light, from a distance the box appears to have a photon that's basically at rest since it's not moving out of the box. The photon box thus has a confined interaction (photon with the walls of the box) and it has a mass proportional to the number of photons in the box, due to E=mc^2. Also, the more tightly confined the photons, the smaller their wavelength must be, and thus the more mass the box has (this comes from the Heisenberg uncertainty principle). This is how protons and neutrons get most of their mass: they are systems of tightly confined quarks and gluons which have little to no mass themselves, but because they're stuck in a tiny "box", they have significant mass. By the way, this same thing does apply to other confined systems like electrons in an atom, but because the forces involved are quite weak, this confined interaction mass is negligible. Electrons themselves are always engaging in an interaction with the Higgs field which changes a particular property back and forth at a tremendous frequency. Electrons cannot escape this interaction because the Higgs field has a positive value everywhere; if not for this interaction, electrons would retain one of these values until colliding with another discrete particle. Thus electrons are constantly in a confined "box" of interaction created by the Higgs field. This means that electrons have mass even if they're not apparently interacting with anything, because actually they're always interacting with the Higgs field at a high frequency. Finally, any mass causes a curvature in spacetime. You can think of photons as always going in straight lines, with what counts as "straight" being distorted by mass. You can also think of photons as interacting with anything with mass. Both views are equivalent so long as they arrive at the same answer, so it's a matter of taste which way you'd prefer to think about it.

  • @foodhead4677
    @foodhead4677 3 роки тому

    Asking the question is different than having the correct answer

  • @pineapplepenumbra
    @pineapplepenumbra 3 роки тому +2

    43:06 Beauty is fleeting....

  • @macroman52
    @macroman52 3 роки тому

    The quantum fields sound a bit like the 19century ether. Didn't Helmholtz think of an atom as a vortex in the "ether fluid"?

  • @Locreai
    @Locreai 2 роки тому

    We live in a hyper dimensional soundwave universe and the coalescence, trough, crest, and crash of frequencies drop out the sound waves into matter.

  • @mikebellamy
    @mikebellamy 3 роки тому +6

    _"to make a particle all you have to do is put some energy into a field there you have it."_ What he seems to be totally ignorant of is the fact that atoms have a complex structure. That is they are *ordered* states of matter whereas energy is highly *disordered* and the assumption that disorder can produce order must be *demonstrated* because it in principle violates the second law. No experiment starting with pure energy has ever been shown to produce a *residual* of matter (ie without antimatter). Quarks and Gluons and Electrons all have their antimatter equivalents so it is a real problem as to how you get a plasma of these in the first place.

  • @mikebellamy
    @mikebellamy 3 роки тому +3

    Most profound question _"where did it [all] come from?"_ answer _"we don't 'yet' know!"_
    The _"yet"_ is the code flag for *scientism* or *science of the gaps!*
    Which all just means _"we know the theory violates the laws of physics (and is therefore falsified) but we have FAITH that some unknown FUTURE SCIENCE will solve it."_ because otherwise we've got *God* to deal with and we can't have that can we, even if its true.

    • @skilz8098
      @skilz8098 3 роки тому

      Genesis 1:1-3, Ecclesiastes 1, & John 1:1-5 about sums it all up!

    • @lordcirth
      @lordcirth 3 роки тому +2

      Occam's Razor. We must assume there is some reasonably simple explanation. An infinitely intelligent being is an infinitely complex explanation. The human brain is biased to think of people as being simple, because we have lots of brainpower evolved to model other people, but in reality the human brain is the most complicated thing on Earth, and a god would be infinitely more complex.

    • @skilz8098
      @skilz8098 3 роки тому +1

      @@lordcirth Try to think of it this way. All the matter, all the energy, all the atoms and stars which are of the physical realm and even the numbers, math, physics, etc. which are conceptual (a product of the mind) all came from The Creator of All Things. He is beyond the Physical as he is Spirit. You can not measure Spirit or True Consciousness (The Mind of God) by any human or empirical means as the Cosmos itself including Space and Time all came from him! How am I able to claim this? From all that I have taken in, learned, observed the more I study, experience things, etc... the more I see nothing but pure Intelligent Design behind it all. Where's my proof? I am the proof as I am just one single soul within a mortal flesh body that happens to be a product of his Holy Words crafted by His Hands. Someone had to "write our DNA". The structure, order, and encoded instructions did not happen by mere random chance and luck! If it was all just random chance and luck as to how we came to be, then what purpose is there and what's the point? We are here for a purpose and we are morally obligated to our thoughts, choices and actions! I have felt the presence of the Holy Spirit and it is beyond human comprehension based on worlds and meaning alone.

    • @mikebellamy
      @mikebellamy 3 роки тому

      @@lordcirth *Wrong!* Occam's Razor does *not* say _"assume there is some reasonably simple explanation."_
      It says *Of all the possible explanations we choose the simplest.* Nature is not a possible explanation for the origin of the universe nor any of the ordered structures in it because nature must obey a law of decreasing order with time. So the question how did it get ordered in the first place excludes nature. The simplest and only possible explanation is therefore supernatural from outside of the universe and that accords with the God who told us about himself in the bible.
      To say the infinite God is _"infinitely complex"_ assumes he is made of something else like atoms as we are but that is *not* what bible believing Christians believe nor haw he describes himself in the bible. If you want to argue against the God of the bible then you need to use the bible and get that much right before you go publicly exposing your ignorance.

    • @lordcirth
      @lordcirth 3 роки тому +1

      @@skilz8098 The thing about "proof" - more correctly "evidence", as it's never really absolute - is that you have to be able to show it to other people. Feeling a presence is not something you can show to other people, or measure. So you can believe it if you want, but you cannot expect anyone else to.

  • @walkabout16
    @walkabout16 8 місяців тому

    In the realm of cosmic wonder, where mysteries unfurl,
    Harry Cliff beckons, with wisdom to swirl.
    "What does it take to make a universe?" he asks,
    In the cosmic dance, where questions bask.
    At The Royal Institution, where knowledge gleams,
    Harry guides us through the cosmic streams.
    From the birth of stars to the depths of space,
    He unveils the secrets of time and place.
    With every particle collision, a glimpse of creation,
    In the quest for answers, a cosmic sensation.
    From quarks to galaxies, in the cosmic ballet,
    Harry Cliff leads the way, night and day.
    What forces shape the fabric of existence?
    In the symphony of particles, with persistent insistence.
    Dark matter, black holes, and the cosmic dust,
    Harry's insights, in the universe's trust.
    In the tapestry of space-time, where wonders reside,
    Harry Cliff's wisdom, like a cosmic guide.
    With every question asked, a universe unfurls,
    In the cosmic journey, where knowledge swirls.

  • @stevoofd
    @stevoofd 3 роки тому

    43:17 so quarks turn into Tetris blocks?

  • @gyro5d
    @gyro5d 2 роки тому

    Or, Matter is in Space and Mass is in Counterspace!
    The Bullet Cluster Galaxy.
    Have a wheel rotating, stop the wheel, let go. The wheel starts rotating, because its Mass in Counterspace is still rotating.

  • @paulbrookes413
    @paulbrookes413 3 роки тому

    TREE OF KNOWLEDGE

  • @deltalima6703
    @deltalima6703 3 роки тому +1

    28:00 skip to here absolutely nothing new before this
    45:00 some newish muon stuff

  • @mikebellamy
    @mikebellamy 3 роки тому +2

    _"there are definitely gaps in our recipe for apple pie"_ Really.. what about the origin of the *mind* with the *purpose* and *reason* for making an apple pie in the first place.. *Who wanted one and where did that "who" come from?*

  • @geeky_explorer9105
    @geeky_explorer9105 3 роки тому +1

    Long waited lecture

  • @gospelofthomas77thpearl22
    @gospelofthomas77thpearl22 3 роки тому

    The bits of the recipe that are missing are in 77th Pearl: The Perpetual Tree. 🖖🏼

  • @extremeuzer3
    @extremeuzer3 Рік тому

    Wait, if the Higgs had a zero value (thus making all particles massless) you said atoms don’t form. But I thought atoms formed through the strong nuclear force and not gravity. Am I missing something?