Brian Jenkins more than liked it -- it motivated him to get back in the studio himself which is why DF exists at all. Sure wasn't Yoko motivating John - he'd been blocked for 5 years with that slug as his "musical partner". Even from afar, it was still Paul who motivated him to compose again.
One of the things I love about Paul is that you can find him in almost any stage or period of rock history and you will find him, just being Paul. Think about it: at the moment of this interview, hip hop and new wave were just starting, bands like The Smiths were not formed yet. U2 were still struggling to get an audience, The Clash was huge, punk was taking over UK, John Lennon was still alive. Metallica didn’t even existed. However there he was. The same old Paul, still genius, still humble, still doing his thing: making music. You can see him in 1967, 1980, 2019, he’s always the same.
Just a nice,sweet,humble genius.in slot if his interviews, he gives praise to those he has great admiration for i.e. Hendrix,his bandmates,many more than I can name.That's a true gentleman and class act.I was lucky to have WON Beatke tickets for their final CV concert at Candlestick Park in SF.They were funny and fantastic ( you actually could hear them) I was in my 20's.Also worked at a recording studio in San Mateo ( Pacific Recording with the great Fred Catero and David Rubinson in 1968 to 1970.Great ERA. Miss the 69's. Go Paul..you rock!!
Paul was honestly admitting here that he's more of a musician than a lyricist. Although he's done some great words or lyrics before, he said that in most of his songs the music came first. John, on the other hand, is the superior lyricist. So when they work together, the results are awesome.
Those two albums, McCartney I and McCartney II, are fantastic. Specially on McCartney I, he was (again) a total pioneer, recording everything by himself (which everyone does of course). And it still sounds great lo fi, his musicianship shines more than in his more elaborate productions. Even the instrumentals are fantastic.
agree 100% I loved McCartney 1 and RAM. Back then when they were first released we didn't know anything about John and Paul throwing a few barbs at each other. I love Monkberry Moon Delight, even if the words are a bit gruesome. He really shows that he can be a powerful vocalist in that song.....and then "Sitting in the Backseat of My Car" .....a complete 180!
i agree. I think McCartney I and II and also Ram, which was informed by this DIY aesthetic, was Paul at his post-Beatles best, frankly. But he got hammered mercilessly for all three so he had to regroup each time with "proper" pop records to follow.
Lennon said, "Coming Up" brought him out of retirement. He would go around his apartment singing the song. Lennon always thought the studio version was superior to the live version
@@ohdear2001 Brilliant. Spot on. To elaborate more - he could not lie about who wrote what and what he "created". Now you'd think he was the only songwriter in the Beatles and had a split personality, writing both his drek like 64, Maxwell's and of course only-possibly-Lennon stuff like Lucy and In My Life. What he's really brilliant at is re-writing history. No one here to challenge him now. And no, Ringo doesnt care.
@@ohdear2001 Oh PAHLEEZE...like you know all the facts about everything between John and Paul, if he says something about a song, what authority do you HAVE to say he's not telling the truth????
@@peterf08 He is on stoney ground when it comes to the past and he admits here he is not a lyricist. So Mary Had A Little lamb, The Frog Song and C Moon are his 'stuff' whereas the past discography was vastly different. He uses his right hand all the time too. I am not 100% but this guy and especially his wife really seem totally fake to me, a bit like Linda's Burgers..look and taste like the real deal but when you investigate, they are totally fake even though (Nice but Dim) Tim must have rehearsed this quite a few times?
@@peterf08 wrong. Billy shears was and still is the main replacement however there were a couple other musicians posing as "fauls" from the late 60s up until the early 00s. And one of such musicians is the guy jn this video. The guy in this video is neither Paul nor Billy its Bruce welch from the Shadows AS Faul Mccartney. It's quite easy to tell the differences between Billy and the other two fauls. Billy has a longer face and often wears a prosthetic nose While Bruce has a slightly more oval face and thin nose which looks kind of beaky from the side, while the third double whose name is Frank Allen he was the bass player for the searchers and when posing as Faul he had a round face, thin nose, and a thicker accent than the 2 of them. I'm not saying they were the main replacementts and I'm not saying they're still around what I am saying is tho is that Billy was definitely not the only man posing as "The Paul Mccartney" at least until the mid 00s.
He is always a great interview, because he jokes around a little, but is so transparent with his opinion. As you watch this, keep in mind that he released "McCartney II" in May of 1980. He was out doing promo interviews......just months before John died.
McCartney II might just be Paul's most underappreciated album. At least until recently. The New generation of people open to electronic music, such as myself, love what he did on that one.
Paul was 78 when McCartney 111 was released. The more I listen to his music, the more there is to hear and his albums from way back when they are still relevant today.
The most talented of all The Beatles....best singer, best musician (he plays EVERYTHING), excellent song writer (but so was John), and best looking (well most think so). We are so lucky to have him still....
Smufter16 George was more handsome, and John wrote at least as well. Paul was the most talented musician and wrote the best melodies. I much prefer John’s best solo stuff to Paul’s solo stuff
Great interview! Paul here looks ten years younger than he really was! Maybe the shorter hair, his clean and slim face remind me of his early Beatles years.. Always a beautiful man and amazing musician! And his speaking voice is always so captivating..
Seeing the Beatles in 1980 just before John's death always gets to me. I think at this point, all 4 of them believed on some level that they would reunite in some capacity. Whether for an album, a live performance, a full tour, or even just a single song. It was going to happen until the day it became impossible for The Beatles to ever exist again.
Interesting that waterfall was seen as the big song of the album and now probably Temporary Secretary is the track that defines this album ...definitely ahead of its time.
Crazy how - at the time - anyone could have had the opinion "this sounds like typical McCartney; standard stuff with a rock group". Like, what? I know it wasn't on the record specifically, but "Check My Machine" pretty much invented the Gorillaz at least a decade before they existed. Sure there's a few generic blues tracks on this record, but a lot of it is so forward-thinking it's just wild to me anyone could have thought that at the time. I wasn't alive then - was born in the 90s - but that's all I can say really: just wild to me anyone thought this sounded like "just another McCartney record with a rock group". If anything demonstrates to me the bias the music press had against him; so predisposed to think he was washed up they couldn't see him practically inventing genres that wouldn't reveal themselves until ~15 years after this record... whilst just goofing off recording drums in his bathroom. Crazy.
Paul is just like the rest of us composers in the sense that sometimes the music comes first, and sometimes the lyrics. The important part of composing music happens when your are just letting your fingers move around on the piano without thinking of a specific chord. The more intricate chords you know as a pianist, the better the composition will turn out because you can then use really nice chord progressions and setup chords that lead into an emotional part of the song. Unfortunately, that rarely happens today with music. But, if young musicians learned Jazz chords, R&B Chords and Gospel chords, you could write incredible music that would be a hit today. That's what Bruno Mars and Adele have. That is why their music is ahead of others just looping repetitive beats.
I look at interviews like this in a pre December 1980 - post December 1980 kind of way. History tells us what happened, but Macca could never have imagined.
Paul and John both had their moments in their solo careers, a handful of reslly great songs. Still could never duplicate the sheer greatness of when they worked as a team, though. They perfectly complimented each other and edited each other just enough to make really good turn into great. And they literally created at least 50 GREAT songs together ( in including George & ringo as in The Beatles). Too bad they didn’t eventually work together again . I get taking some years apart, but you’d have thunk that after say 5 years they’d realize they were NEVER going to match the quality of their partnership.
@@Bloxdio_God I didn't know that. I wasn’t born yet, but my parents are from that generation (They are Brazilian Baby Boomers) and they wore bell bottoms until 1979.
Were you even alive then? I ask because I was and McCartney here is not wearing 70's style here. No flared collar, no flared pant leg. This is a pre-Yuppie 80's look entirely. Even the color scheme the host is wearing looks more early-80's than late-70's.
Here's a bit of theory, the 80's style didn't really kick in till 82/83 till then late 70's fashion/style bridged over till then, the same apply's to the late 80's to early 90's, if you don't know the year of a clip or photo you see I think it id be quite hard to pinpoint the year within there times fashion wise.
Artists are so able to keep their own minds self entertained...until boredom catches them by surprise to torture them...Paul suffered from intermittent spells of boredom...believe it or not...painful thing actually!
Interviewer is wearing Beatle boots!!!!! Makes me remember the one's I once had...Only they were soild Black! Anybody else remember or have a pair of those?
I love his little cough after saying he wanted to apologize to all the mixers, drummers and guitar players. He knows, we know, he is the best at all those functions.
Strange interview. A lot of Rice's questions seemed to perplex Paul. And did he really ask him if Band on the Run would've been more popular if the lyric had been more accessible? That's pretty obnoxious.
Not one of my favourite albums, but that's no disrespect, and you can't hate it, because it was just an experiment. Temporary Secretary is pretty catchy.
I feel like he looked so different after John's death. Not only his appearance in public but also his image in general. Maybe it doesn't even have anything to do with John's death but I personally think it does a little bit.
For me it's genius if you as an artist knows what kind of lyric will suit this melody he has done it again and again. with john it was the lyric first and then what kind of melody suit the lyric so they were yin and yan for each other that's what made them great when they were together
I want to scream, “ Round up John, George and Ringo! This is the last year that you’ll have a chance at a true Beatles reunion!” Sadly John got killed later in the year. The dream was over. 😓
he wanted to do the same thing john did in the seventies with the basic recording techniques. too bad they couldn't do that together in the mid seventies or something
"At certain times I've done some good words." - Paul McCartney, writer of Yesterday, Let It Be, Hey Jude, Blackbird, etc
Modest guy. Total and utter genius.
Penny Lane, Eleanor Rigby, The Long and Winding Road....
He's not stupid. He knows what he's doing and how it comes across. Probably the best PR man in the world, weren't they Lennon's words?
How about “Here there and Everywhere” a very great love song!!!!
@@da_great_mogul Thank you. I can't believe how naive everyone else is.
Nice interview.
John was still alive here.
Yes
Brian Jenkins more than liked it -- it motivated him to get back in the studio himself which is why DF exists at all. Sure wasn't Yoko motivating John - he'd been blocked for 5 years with that slug as his "musical partner". Even from afar, it was still Paul who motivated him to compose again.
No shit
But Paul wasn’t for sure.... nobody seems to notice what kind of imitator is this guy, nothing alike to real Paul
@@Lysergic_Fox Here Here ! Thank you !
Paul wants to apologize to all the "real" guitarists? He played the guitar on "Taxman"(!). What a humble guy.
McCartney II is pure art. I love hearing this side of Paul.
Paul died in 1966
@@peterf08 Your brain-dead now.
@@wanderer1955 im from Liverpool, most of us know this just by his accent
@@peterf08 Hey fatlad. I'm from Liverpool too. McCartney isn't dead. Stop being a scally yas plant pot!!
One of the things I love about Paul is that you can find him in almost any stage or period of rock history and you will find him, just being Paul. Think about it: at the moment of this interview, hip hop and new wave were just starting, bands like The Smiths were not formed yet. U2 were still struggling to get an audience, The Clash was huge, punk was taking over UK, John Lennon was still alive. Metallica didn’t even existed. However there he was. The same old Paul, still genius, still humble, still doing his thing: making music. You can see him in 1967, 1980, 2019, he’s always the same.
"Him being Paul". How ironic...
Give up.
Agreed, I've been listening to alot of interviews lately. He's such a bright, funny, seemingly humble guy
Just a nice,sweet,humble genius.in slot if his interviews, he gives praise to those he has great admiration for i.e. Hendrix,his bandmates,many more than I can name.That's a true gentleman and class act.I was lucky to have WON Beatke tickets for their final CV concert at Candlestick Park in SF.They were funny and fantastic ( you actually could hear them) I was in my 20's.Also worked at a recording studio in San Mateo ( Pacific Recording with the great Fred Catero and David Rubinson in 1968 to 1970.Great ERA. Miss the 69's. Go Paul..you rock!!
Not the same as before 1966, though.
Paul was honestly admitting here that he's more of a musician than a lyricist. Although he's done some great words or lyrics before, he said that in most of his songs the music came first. John, on the other hand, is the superior lyricist. So when they work together, the results are awesome.
Disagree! Paul is just as good if not greater lyricist than Lennon!
This was just a few months after he was arrested in Japan. And then Lennon was murdered. An awful time.
Was that when his fingerprints didn't match up and government bailed him out
Very suspicious
and he made temporary secretary this was definitely a bad time
@@MultiBULLYBEEF no the british government got him out
Every single interviewer ever: Can you elaborate on the mystical reasons why you created this latest enigmatic work of wonder?
Macca: I just did it
right, i'd ask him exactly this one about Deep Down
Paul died in 1966
@@peterf08 And what year did your brain die?
I have loved the Beatles and Paul McCarthy all my life nothing I see him do changes that he is fantastic
Who still loves Paul in 2020?
kfoster009 I do!
June 2121. Yep still a fan 👍🏼
I do!
Me . Plus 100s of 1,000,000s of others
And 2024 ❤
Those two albums, McCartney I and McCartney II, are fantastic. Specially on McCartney I, he was (again) a total pioneer, recording everything by himself (which everyone does of course). And it still sounds great lo fi, his musicianship shines more than in his more elaborate productions. Even the instrumentals are fantastic.
agree 100% I loved McCartney 1 and RAM. Back then when they were first released we didn't know anything about John and Paul throwing a few barbs at each other. I love Monkberry Moon Delight, even if the words are a bit gruesome. He really shows that he can be a powerful vocalist in that song.....and then "Sitting in the Backseat of My Car" .....a complete 180!
We can only hope far a McCartney lll !
@@jacobjinglehymer8789 Came out December last year went to no1!!😂
i agree. I think McCartney I and II and also Ram, which was informed by this DIY aesthetic, was Paul at his post-Beatles best, frankly. But he got hammered mercilessly for all three so he had to regroup each time with "proper" pop records to follow.
McCartney 2 is typical 80s synth crap. Temporary Secretary is bloody awful. Bogey music is not good. The rest isn't bad.
John Lennon liked Coming UP
True
Lennon said, "Coming Up" brought him out of retirement.
He would go around his apartment singing the song.
Lennon always thought the studio version was superior to the live version
Macca Rules! Thanks Macca for all this great music that cradled my youth.
Very very interesting to hear Paul talking before John died.
I know this comment is 10 years old but why specifically do you like to hear him before John died?
@@gretchennelson7056 Because it's more honest.
@@ohdear2001 Brilliant. Spot on. To elaborate more - he could not lie about who wrote what and what he "created". Now you'd think he was the only songwriter in the Beatles and had a split personality, writing both his drek like 64, Maxwell's and of course only-possibly-Lennon stuff like Lucy and In My Life. What he's really brilliant at is re-writing history. No one here to challenge him now. And no, Ringo doesnt care.
@@ohdear2001 Oh PAHLEEZE...like you know all the facts about everything between John and Paul, if he says something about a song, what authority do you HAVE to say he's not telling the truth????
@@brucetowell3432Lennonists 🤮
This man can do no wrong in my eyes! Absolutely love him!!
Call it blind faith, or call it being caught up in his fame but whichever it is wrong to think he can do no wrong.
@@dallasbrubaker6054 ...you're literally correct,....however, I think Natalie knows that too, No one is perfect.
Which one Billy or Paul
RANDY JUDAH TORREZ <
Where is all the cheeky charm that JPM had.....?
@@peterf08 He is on stoney ground when it comes to the past and he admits here he is not a lyricist. So Mary Had A Little lamb, The Frog Song and C Moon are his 'stuff' whereas the past discography was vastly different. He uses his right hand all the time too. I am not 100% but this guy and especially his wife really seem totally fake to me, a bit like Linda's Burgers..look and taste like the real deal but when you investigate, they are totally fake even though (Nice but Dim) Tim must have rehearsed this quite a few times?
Beautiful eyes..
Billy Shears
@@peterf08 -_-
@@sean6992 Vivian Stanshall.
I liked his brown eyes better
@@peterf08 wrong. Billy shears was and still is the main replacement however there were a couple other musicians posing as "fauls" from the late 60s up until the early 00s. And one of such musicians is the guy jn this video. The guy in this video is neither Paul nor Billy its Bruce welch from the Shadows AS Faul Mccartney. It's quite easy to tell the differences between Billy and the other two fauls. Billy has a longer face and often wears a prosthetic nose While Bruce has a slightly more oval face and thin nose which looks kind of beaky from the side, while the third double whose name is Frank Allen he was the bass player for the searchers and when posing as Faul he had a round face, thin nose, and a thicker accent than the 2 of them. I'm not saying they were the main replacementts and I'm not saying they're still around what I am saying is tho is that Billy was definitely not the only man posing as "The Paul Mccartney" at least until the mid 00s.
I was 13 when this was released, and it brings back great memories! Thank you sir Paul!
I'm 13 rn
That moment when Paul McCartney did an interview on the set of Power Rangers
He is always a great interview, because he jokes around a little, but is so transparent with his opinion. As you watch this, keep in mind that he released "McCartney II" in May of 1980. He was out doing promo interviews......just months before John died.
McCartney II might just be Paul's most underappreciated album. At least until recently. The New generation of people open to electronic music, such as myself, love what he did on that one.
he talks about having a cassette player in his car like he is the man haha
James Adcock Cassette player in the car was almost unheard of in 1980.
Very common by 1984 though.
"Like" he's the man!!??
He fuckin is the man my friend
I didn't read it that way; he actually looks a little embarrassed saying it.
@Greg Hubbard Well it was the norm where I lived in the middle east. All taxi's had them too, and they weren't pricey cab companies like today's.
McCartney 1,II, and III are a complete narrative continuity. All Paul, all instruments, and the production. Man’s a genius.
Paul was 78 when McCartney 111 was released. The more I listen to his music, the more there is to hear and his albums from way back when they are still relevant today.
The most talented of all The Beatles....best singer, best musician (he plays EVERYTHING), excellent song writer (but so was John), and best looking (well most think so). We are so lucky to have him still....
Smufter16 George was more handsome, and John wrote at least as well. Paul was the most talented musician and wrote the best melodies. I much prefer John’s best solo stuff to Paul’s solo stuff
jnixa1010 Paul was the sexiest Beatle
Nomo 4u I was playing on the looks... it’s a subjective thing
Smufter 16 Or do we?
We can have “ this Paul”, but the real Paul isnt with us since 1966...
Paul is adorable
What an excellent, involved and polite interviewer.
And now we have McCartney III 🎉
Do you think we will have a Mccartney 4
I don't think so he waited 10 years for 2 and 40 years for 3 so maybe not.
Sadly his voice has gone now. Hope there's no McCartney 4😢
Yes and it's brilliant!
@@nedadevcic5840 McCartney 3 is poo.
McCartney II is a wonderful album. One of the first of Paul's I got.
Great interview.
Great interview! Paul here looks ten years younger than he really was! Maybe the shorter hair, his clean and slim face remind me of his early Beatles years.. Always a beautiful man and amazing musician! And his speaking voice is always so captivating..
Why is this interview so calm
be quiet it’s Britain
Probably since there's no audience chatter and the fact that both of them are keeping it chill
because then john still alive
an amazing album
I love the 1980's Paul. Actually he's great anytime!
Almost like a different person..
@@peterf08 A different person since 1966.
Damn I love Paul. ❤ McCartney II has become a favourite must-have cd in the car for me.
John was still alive at the time 😔
"Yesterday" started out as "scrambled eggs" lol.
"Good evening, Tom" :D
The interviewer, Tim Rice, is a brilliant lyricist. He wrote J.C. Superstar for A.L. Webber.
The same year we lost John. At the time of this interview anything was still possible.
Paul is so modest.
More an Egomaniac.
Seeing the Beatles in 1980 just before John's death always gets to me. I think at this point, all 4 of them believed on some level that they would reunite in some capacity. Whether for an album, a live performance, a full tour, or even just a single song. It was going to happen until the day it became impossible for The Beatles to ever exist again.
Good album. Temporary Secretary is real groove.
Is that a drum on a toilet at 3:26 ? 😂
I like the interview and love the host’s green boots 👍
Such an underrated album
Interesting that waterfall was seen as the big song of the album and now probably Temporary Secretary is the track that defines this album ...definitely ahead of its time.
So far ahead of its time that it still hasn't happened? Paul McCartney is very talented but this is not my favourite song; it is an oddity, no?
This interview was 1980-May-19th
Crazy how - at the time - anyone could have had the opinion "this sounds like typical McCartney; standard stuff with a rock group". Like, what? I know it wasn't on the record specifically, but "Check My Machine" pretty much invented the Gorillaz at least a decade before they existed. Sure there's a few generic blues tracks on this record, but a lot of it is so forward-thinking it's just wild to me anyone could have thought that at the time. I wasn't alive then - was born in the 90s - but that's all I can say really: just wild to me anyone thought this sounded like "just another McCartney record with a rock group". If anything demonstrates to me the bias the music press had against him; so predisposed to think he was washed up they couldn't see him practically inventing genres that wouldn't reveal themselves until ~15 years after this record... whilst just goofing off recording drums in his bathroom. Crazy.
7.55 Wow just wow, his explanation about what makes a good lyric. That's philosophy and why his music touches people so deeply.
Paul is just like the rest of us composers in the sense that sometimes the music comes first, and sometimes the lyrics. The important part of composing music happens when your are just letting your fingers move around on the piano without thinking of a specific chord. The more intricate chords you know as a pianist, the better the composition will turn out because you can then use really nice chord progressions and setup chords that lead into an emotional part of the song. Unfortunately, that rarely happens today with music. But, if young musicians learned Jazz chords, R&B Chords and Gospel chords, you could write incredible music that would be a hit today. That's what Bruno Mars and Adele have. That is why their music is ahead of others just looping repetitive beats.
I look at interviews like this in a pre December 1980 - post December 1980 kind of way. History tells us what happened, but Macca could never have imagined.
Yeah, I just had the same thought
Interesting interview! Thanks for uploading.
Paul and John both had their moments in their solo careers, a handful of reslly great songs. Still could never duplicate the sheer greatness of when they worked as a team, though. They perfectly complimented each other and edited each other just enough to make really good turn into great. And they literally created at least 50 GREAT songs together ( in including George & ringo as in The Beatles). Too bad they didn’t eventually work together again . I get taking some years apart, but you’d have thunk that after say 5 years they’d realize they were NEVER going to match the quality of their partnership.
The Beatles original catalogue is more like 200 songs.
So…no, not only 50 great tunes there.
It was 1980 and they still were wearing clothes in the style of 70's
Give em a chance people still wore flares until 82.
@@Bloxdio_God
I didn't know that. I wasn’t born yet, but my parents are from that generation (They are Brazilian Baby Boomers) and they wore bell bottoms until 1979.
The 70s ended in like 82 or 83
People didn't throw their 70s clothes away on 31st December 1979 and then put 80s outfits on, on 1st January 1980. Haha.
Were you even alive then? I ask because I was and McCartney here is not wearing 70's style here. No flared collar, no flared pant leg. This is a pre-Yuppie 80's look entirely. Even the color scheme the host is wearing looks more early-80's than late-70's.
Good evening Tom...Tim Rice is songwriting Royalty but doesnt phase Macca...Paul is literally on a plateau with John on their own.
Waterfalls is the best track on the album.
One of These Days is best
Live love and leave a legacy the mans done it 👍
I Love This Album!
Wikipedia: Despite its less-than-rapturous critical reaction, McCartney II has continued to remain a favourite of McCartney devotees.
Here's a bit of theory, the 80's style didn't really kick in till 82/83 till then late 70's fashion/style bridged over till then, the same apply's to the late 80's to early 90's, if you don't know the year of a clip or photo you see I think it id be quite hard to pinpoint the year within there times fashion wise.
Artists are so able to keep their own minds self entertained...until boredom catches them by surprise to torture them...Paul suffered from intermittent spells of boredom...believe it or not...painful thing actually!
McCartney and his “weed” cough 😂
Maybe, but he was still a cigarette smoker back then. I think he quit around ‘82.
He looks stoned
I just love him
I've done some good words...and in the end the love you take is equal to the love you make.
Love the interviewer's green beatle boots.
These are guys, I don't see any boobs....LMAO!!!
Duff Baker lol
Interviewer is wearing Beatle boots!!!!! Makes me remember the one's I once had...Only they were soild Black!
Anybody else remember or have a pair of those?
Tim Rice had a chat show? Never knew that. Versatile man.
This is a groovy set!!!
Oh no, it's horrible! Dated too for 1980, radioactive with 1976-ness.
Came here after watching the most recent interview with Paul & jimmy Fallon
love the way he says Japanese holiday aka prison.
Album released 16 May 1980
Always loved one of these days.
The interviewer keeps interrupting him..... 😒
DANG I love that guy!!
I love his little cough after saying he wanted to apologize to all the mixers, drummers and guitar players. He knows, we know, he is the best at all those functions.
What an asinine statement. Just another Macca sycophant ...
@x Actually he was choking on a seed!..
Jesus how many "Pauls" are there?
At the very least 3.
Nine
64
I don't know, but this is obviously a phoney. Paul never boasted about himself. He was humble.
@sandykopi He was just kidding around; notice how he said "Tim" a few seconds later ...
My japanese holiday!! I love it Paul,
ha ha ha ha God Bless You.
Chimbo
Was that when his fingerprints didn't match
I liked both albums
1980 and 2001 were horrific years for obvious reasons.
im the biggest beatles fan && paul mcCartney fan ever hes such a idol :)
Wow....classic interview!
I love Paul!!!
'doing this for my own insanity' lol paul ...
Strange interview. A lot of Rice's questions seemed to perplex Paul. And did he really ask him if Band on the Run would've been more popular if the lyric had been more accessible? That's pretty obnoxious.
Geoff Scheinbach I agree, possibly one of the strangest interviews I’ve seen!
Not one of my favourite albums, but that's no disrespect, and you can't hate it, because it was just an experiment. Temporary Secretary is pretty catchy.
I feel like he looked so different after John's death. Not only his appearance in public but also his image in general. Maybe it doesn't even have anything to do with John's death but I personally think it does a little bit.
Exactly my thought. I can watch his eyes and know that John hasn't died yet.
He looked so much different after 1966 you know when he died and billy shears took over
@@peterf08 Lennon looked far more different after 1966
@@loosilu look at mccartney interview from 1966 and 1967 video on UA-cam, it's plain to see
He cut his hair shorter after John’s death, but idk if that has to do with John’s death or just the general fashion trend of hair being shorter.
Gotta love them green boots the interviewer is wearing...lol
IKR?! 😂
this year will forever be claimed and associated with John Lennons death...so long ago and yet, moved us forever. r.i.p
+dean winchestette John was a deeply flawed man who made deeply meaningful songs.
Barnaby ap Robert you nailed it
1980 is also associated with the Star Wars Empire Strikes Back film.
@@barnabyaprobert5159 .....it's almost a prerequisite. Hard times can bring great wisdom
1980 also saw the death of Steve McQueen, Peter Sellers and my all-time favourite film director Alfred Hitchcock.
He said TOM not TIM did anyone notice; right at the start?????
Great 😊 interview
thos green ankle boots on Tim Rice at 0:01, nice.
For me it's genius if you as an artist knows what kind of lyric will suit this melody he has done it again and again. with john it was the lyric first and then what kind of melody suit the lyric so they were yin and yan for each other that's what made them great when they were together
Paul had the drum on the toilet, lol! Well, the acoustics would be great!
3:23 though 😂👍
i think its his best album even better than memory almost full...and that is saying something
I want to scream, “ Round up John, George and Ringo! This is the last year that you’ll have a chance at a true Beatles reunion!” Sadly John got killed later in the year. The dream was over. 😓
Yea, very sad
I LOVE PAUL MCCARTNEY MORE THEN I LOVE MYSELF...AND I LOVE JOHN LENNON AND GEORGE HARRISON MORE THEN I LOVE MYSELF!
& I love them more than you also...
Wow
8:41 ! Paul loves to be loved! And that's why we love him! And many other reasons, too many to be numbered - phhhht - Japanese Holiday, oops!
he wanted to do the same thing john did in the seventies with the basic recording techniques. too bad they couldn't do that together in the mid seventies or something
interviewer sounds like stewie griffin
Sir Tim Rice....a lyricist known for his work with Andrew Lloyd Webber. Never noticed before but you're right he does sound like Stewie 😄