Yes, they were complex another way comparing current systems. The most important to understand the motive, limitations and why looked as way the SAMs as they did. It is clearly seen what were the field experience and what was the impact on the upgrades and following designs. The SAMs did not come from "vacuum".
No, you wouldn't have. Even if by some witches curse, you decided to do a maths subject at university and because of the curse the witch placed on you, you are forced to choose the subject "Linear Algebra." The witches curse might have forced you to enrol yourself in that class, but there's no power in the universe that could make you enjoy it!!! Even powerful magic, combined with powerful drugs, combined with paid assistants, whose job it is to keep you focused, you will NEVER be able to maintain focus in a Linear Algebra course. The problem is that everything is so fucking abstract!!! In my degree as a Chemist (BSc, double major in chemistry) or as a Psychologist (BA psych), I had to do a LOT of different mathematical and statistical analysis and functions and graphic and deriving, etc... Yet not once in my studies, or in my working life in the almost 20 years since have I EVER had to determine the Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues of a matrix. I've never had to diagonalise a matrix. I don't even remember how to do any of those things anymore, and yet my life is as full as the day I learned how to do all that. I chose to enrol in that subject because I thought it seemed easy. I was such a fucking idiot!!! Maths can mean a LOT of different things. If you don't like maths it's probably because you're not good at it. But maths is like anything else; Practice it enough and you'll get good at it. If you honestly make an effort to get good at maths and you stay with it for three months, I guarantee you that you'll start liking maths because you're going to start being really good at it. Once you're good at maths and have started enjoying it, you can either go crazy and start doing crazy shit like Linear Algebra, or you might apply yourself to Chemistry (I highly recommend Chemistry, since every chemist is also a highly accomplished particle physicist AND a nuclear physicist). I also recommend Engineering, or Physics/ Astrophysics. You see, once you start understanding maths and getting good at it, you'll start to find it easy, and then even top tier jobs like Engineering or Chemist-ing or Physics-ing become feasible. You'll be good at those subjects and would be great at that work. I can't recommend it enough. Best of all, along with the understanding of these subjects, you gain a wonderfully deep understanding of the world and how it works as well as the greater universe around us. All the questions you used to wonder about as a kid, but forgot about as an adult are questions that you are able to answer as a scientist/ engineer. edit - the second paragraph should say *"Graphing"* and not "graphic"
I actually had a physics-teacher in high school that kind of did this. He'd ask some random people in the class what their general interests were and he'd try to relate the subject to that if he could. It was awesome. That guy really changed the way I looked at science and physics. I remember one particular class where he asked me. So I told him 'I like history and aviation'. And he said: 'So you know how important radar was during the battle of Britain? Do you know how radar works?' Awesome guy now that I think back on that.
who ever is interested in SAM systems, there is a great highly realistic simulator free to download called SAM simulator, it simulates sa-2,sa-3,sa-4,sa-5, and zsu-23-4 shilka anti aircraft gun
@@molnibalage83 ...wow, I didn't know that, but I felt that there was some info obtained from hpasp, because I read about the yo-yo fire control radar on simHQ forum, I'm a huge samsim fan by the way
The amount of research on this video is incredible. Looking forward for the s300 and later variant. At the same time, it would also be interesting to make similar contents on anti-ship msystems. Thank you 👍
Militavia (so the channel that made all of this research and gave Binkov the script) will soon publish video on S-300. I really hope more people would go to that channel and subscribe, because you won't find any other channel with so much information on the Air Defense systems.
Binkov you have outdone yourself 👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏 THANK YOU 🙏 that was an excellent succinct informative flawless video 👍 THIS is why I subscribe and support your channel 👍💪
For those of you who want to learn more go watch a documentary called “protecting the skies of the motherland”. 4 episode on Russia air defence. «Защищая небо родины» Edit: it is available on UA-cam, however I could only find the version on Russian: Part 1: ua-cam.com/video/KruEd1Dhwcg/v-deo.html Part 2: ua-cam.com/video/E9ABZ4c0Vxg/v-deo.html Part 3: ua-cam.com/video/qSfmlTZQCD8/v-deo.html Part 4: ua-cam.com/video/0CLWSqYZLrk/v-deo.html
balouserena Unfortunatley I only know the Russian version: ua-cam.com/video/KruEd1Dhwcg/v-deo.html That is part 1 out of 4. It moves from the oldest systems to the newest in the final part.
I really loved this video. If you have paid attention in physics class, this video will interest you very much. Thanks Binkov for the video and the detailed analysis of S-25.
Very high quality work mr.Binkov. Can't wait for a part.2 This was fascinating. I don't care which weapon system you do next. If it's this good, I'm sold.
Thank you for your video, Binkov! Much needed for any outsiders there that any, ANY SAMs are dangerous regardless of technology if you didn't put enough countermeasures in your aircraft.
Excellent video, thanks for using the original GRAU designations as main rather than the confusing NATO ones that often don't discriminate between variants!
If you are interested in soviet planes and rockets, and you are nearby, the museum called Reptár in Szolnok, Hungary worth a visit, at least 40 planes including a spitfire and a me 109 can be seen there. It's like 100 km from Budapest so it's not hard to get there
What many don't know about the cute little frog in these videos is that he was a decorated SAM operator during the Cold War. He is credited with shooting down 1 SR-71 Spyplane, 2 B-47's, 4 Cessna's, a hang-glider, 20 hot air balloons and a cloud that really did look like a monster. Promoted and demoted a record 37 times, Binkov eventually made the rank of General and declared war on cats. After the Binkov-Feline War, as it was known in the east, he retired to a cabin in Minsk to drink the days away and watch videos of frogs mating. Please check out my new book, available on Amazon: Great Fighter Jets of the Galaxy 1 by Tim Gibson. 100 full color pictures of futuristic jets.
Its good to hear about the old Soviet Union and especially the S-25 missile system. The S-25 was tested by the U-2 flights over the Soviet Union from the mid-1950s. The system was not able to intercept a U-2 until 1960 when 14 SA-2 missiles were fired, one downing a MiG-19, before Gary Powers U-2 was hit.
I want to use this opportunity to thank the Beria family for what they accomplished for our country. Like father like son both had immense part in building not only our intelligence services and defence capabilities, but also our industry and enginieering in general as well. They and their efforts are not forgotten. Lavrentiy Pavlovitch's fall in the coup d'etat was a sad episode of soviet history. Lesser men deposed and killed him and stated a huge slander campaign that contunues on to this day.
It seems like a LOT of these systems could have been made a LOT safer if them just moved the command bunker 10 - 20 meters away from the electronics/ radars, via cables, so that anti-radiation missiles/ bomb strikes against the radars would not kill the operators in the bunkers. Maybe some concrete reinforcing, as with Vietnamese SA 2 sites wouldn't have gone amiss, either.
I do not know well that system. In fact most of current SAMs uses quite the same general principle, only their radar types and missiles are different. But exact data are classified. Making a detailed video with useful information is quite hard. The best what is possible when all the major Russians SAMs are known and basics of the NASAMS2 and S-350 you can compare the main items on basic level but that is it. You can't find real usable data about missile maneuvering capability or anything. The principles and goals can be shown but such detailed style what you can see this video is not possible.
since teen years i developed interest in missiles and air defense. Berkut was known to me, pleasanter surprise. My short story - 'the hardest-desert scarab,' consists of defense engaging stand off munitions. Free reading by google search.
This is way to deep question to answer. You need the blueprints of the systems. The principle of the system is the point of the video. You are asking not about "basic design" level but detail design.
Like No one can outmatch US in the air power similarly No one can match Russias SAMs. India purchased S400, which is a memoth with its technology and capabilities. But the specs of S500 are mind-blowing, especially it's range and reaction time 🙏
S-25 as stationary and needing a large infrastructure maybe? S-75 had better mobility while still defending mostly stationary places. It all depends if you are talking Defense of a Country vs. Defense of an Army.
The Nike Ajax is a better example if we wish to make such a comparison but there are many differences between them regarding the missiles and radars. Hopefully the series can run so long that US SAM systems can be presented too.
If possible, could you make a video were ww3 starts but no nukes and same morality just basic ww3 how it would play out would a side win or would it just be who survives the longest type of ww like for example ww1
@@sockaccount8116 Not really. Orthodox rulers were called "Princes" by Roman Catholic Church with the aim of lowering their rank. But they called themselves "Knyaz", with the initial meaning of ''King'' (from Gothic "Kuningaz"). Only when the title of Tsar (Caеsar) was adopted by the Veliky (Great) Knyaz, the same process of lowering took place in Russian Language.
Which A-10? A-10A or A-10C and against what naval asset? I short both in its era is quite ineffective against ships. The only longer range PGM during Cold War was the AGM-65 which is has much smaller range that just an air defense of a small frigate...
if a missile/rocket motor has no turbopump but relies on pressure, maybe it's better to call it pressure-fed? then again if pressurizing gas is generated instead of stored separately it might make sense to call it a gas generator cycle even though 'gas generator cycle' usually implies 'gas is produced to power turbopumps to pump fuel'
If you think through it would be pointless such term. Because if you have pump what does the pump do? Increase pressure. Any fluid is pressure fed. The question is what provides the pressure.
This is not exactly true. In fact the first mobile SARH guided SAM with CW illumination was the HAWK. IOC 1960. For the Soviets the 2K12M Kub, the really fist reliable variant was available about 6-7 years later. The Nike Ajax and Hercules combined wit SAGE were such advanced that we cannot speak about 'ahead'. The US and western SAMs are generally less known because they are barely or not at all were used in combat comparing to Soviet SAMs.
@@andro7862 Which is also not true. The only unique capability of the R-73 was the TVC. The HOBS capability was available in small scale. The F-14J (Block 45 and 46 series) and on F-4N in 1970 was available a helmet mounted sight with AIM-9H. It was considered too complex, heavy and unpractical the system and they discarded. But it was 13+ years ahead of the USSR. Then the US Navy switched to Hornet good slow speed pitch authority instead HOBS. www.best-of-flightgear.dk/vtas.htm Otherwise the R-73 was just and upscaled R-60M with TVC and better seeker gimbal. It is just arrived later and more hyped.
Also tanks the T-64 is the first MBT to have composite armour layout ,smooth bore gun that enter mass production and for an entire decade NATO has nothing similar.
If you check the Nasa web site out there is a 4 part publication Called "Rockets and People" that covers the development of Soviet Missile, Rocket and space Technology. The Story of how the S-25 system came about is covered in one of them.
One of the best SAM videos in youtube, it’s also good to see old systems because most people don’t understand how complex even the older systems were
Yes, they were complex another way comparing current systems.
The most important to understand the motive, limitations and why looked as way the SAMs as they did. It is clearly seen what were the field experience and what was the impact on the upgrades and following designs. The SAMs did not come from "vacuum".
I would love to hear more about air defences! With a lot of technical details! Awesome video! Thumbs up.
No.
;)
Jo@@molnibalage83 h jo i in b m b v i m i CH zu null. Jist der
It will be continued on mine chanell the series on Militavia.
I feel like I would have paid more attention in maths classes if we'd been getting this kind of lecture
Super, super boring... I ended up day dreaming about something else
Sock puppets until grade 12!!
Same
No, you wouldn't have. Even if by some witches curse, you decided to do a maths subject at university and because of the curse the witch placed on you, you are forced to choose the subject "Linear Algebra." The witches curse might have forced you to enrol yourself in that class, but there's no power in the universe that could make you enjoy it!!! Even powerful magic, combined with powerful drugs, combined with paid assistants, whose job it is to keep you focused, you will NEVER be able to maintain focus in a Linear Algebra course.
The problem is that everything is so fucking abstract!!! In my degree as a Chemist (BSc, double major in chemistry) or as a Psychologist (BA psych), I had to do a LOT of different mathematical and statistical analysis and functions and graphic and deriving, etc... Yet not once in my studies, or in my working life in the almost 20 years since have I EVER had to determine the Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues of a matrix. I've never had to diagonalise a matrix. I don't even remember how to do any of those things anymore, and yet my life is as full as the day I learned how to do all that.
I chose to enrol in that subject because I thought it seemed easy. I was such a fucking idiot!!! Maths can mean a LOT of different things. If you don't like maths it's probably because you're not good at it. But maths is like anything else; Practice it enough and you'll get good at it. If you honestly make an effort to get good at maths and you stay with it for three months, I guarantee you that you'll start liking maths because you're going to start being really good at it. Once you're good at maths and have started enjoying it, you can either go crazy and start doing crazy shit like Linear Algebra, or you might apply yourself to Chemistry (I highly recommend Chemistry, since every chemist is also a highly accomplished particle physicist AND a nuclear physicist). I also recommend Engineering, or Physics/ Astrophysics. You see, once you start understanding maths and getting good at it, you'll start to find it easy, and then even top tier jobs like Engineering or Chemist-ing or Physics-ing become feasible. You'll be good at those subjects and would be great at that work. I can't recommend it enough. Best of all, along with the understanding of these subjects, you gain a wonderfully deep understanding of the world and how it works as well as the greater universe around us. All the questions you used to wonder about as a kid, but forgot about as an adult are questions that you are able to answer as a scientist/ engineer.
edit - the second paragraph should say *"Graphing"* and not "graphic"
I actually had a physics-teacher in high school that kind of did this. He'd ask some random people in the class what their general interests were and he'd try to relate the subject to that if he could. It was awesome. That guy really changed the way I looked at science and physics.
I remember one particular class where he asked me. So I told him 'I like history and aviation'. And he said: 'So you know how important radar was during the battle of Britain? Do you know how radar works?'
Awesome guy now that I think back on that.
who ever is interested in SAM systems, there is a great highly realistic simulator free to download called SAM simulator, it simulates sa-2,sa-3,sa-4,sa-5, and zsu-23-4 shilka anti aircraft gun
sites.google.com/site/samsimulator1972/home
Hpasp is also participated in the creation of the video.
Хай
Товарищ
@@molnibalage83 ...wow, I didn't know that, but I felt that there was some info obtained from hpasp, because I read about the yo-yo fire control radar on simHQ forum, I'm a huge samsim fan by the way
Thanks 👍 some great stuff
S400: Grandpa is that you?
Cool sarcastic comment
S 25: kid back in my day I used to kill Bullies that stronger than me
Awwwww.
Cute.
🥰
@@1joshjosh1 no.
The amount of research on this video is incredible. Looking forward for the s300 and later variant. At the same time, it would also be interesting to make similar contents on anti-ship msystems. Thank you 👍
Militavia (so the channel that made all of this research and gave Binkov the script) will soon publish video on S-300. I really hope more people would go to that channel and subscribe, because you won't find any other channel with so much information on the Air Defense systems.
I love Russian SAMs! So many different interesting systems. I just started watching the video, but I'm absolutely sure I'm gonna love it!
Хай товарищ!
I really enjoyed the discussion on how these systems work in the first place
Wow.... I didn't know Moscow had such heavily layered missile defence.
Lol
@@elykeom1 What is the foundation of "LOL"?
Moscow the most secured capital in world
@@molnibalage83 az egy hülye !
I mean when there are NATO armies literally on your every border with air fields then you build heavy defenses.
Amazing in-depth video. I would love to see follow-up videos on later sam systems.
There is one on Militavia channel. Made by the person, who made this script.
really interesting video ! I hope Binkov will cover the rest of soviet SAM systems...
Hopefully the video reach that view count what makes this possible.
Thank you for the effort put into this , loved it!
Congrats to Balázs ! Imprfessive video. Much appreciated.
Binkov you have outdone yourself 👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
THANK YOU 🙏 that was an excellent succinct informative flawless video 👍
THIS is why I subscribe and support your channel 👍💪
For those of you who want to learn more go watch a documentary called “protecting the skies of the motherland”. 4 episode on Russia air defence.
«Защищая небо родины»
Edit: it is available on UA-cam, however I could only find the version on Russian:
Part 1: ua-cam.com/video/KruEd1Dhwcg/v-deo.html
Part 2: ua-cam.com/video/E9ABZ4c0Vxg/v-deo.html
Part 3: ua-cam.com/video/qSfmlTZQCD8/v-deo.html
Part 4: ua-cam.com/video/0CLWSqYZLrk/v-deo.html
Know where it is available
@@USSAnimeNCC- youtube
@@TheGranicd Are you sure? I cannot find it and I would very much like to see this.
balouserena Unfortunatley I only know the Russian version: ua-cam.com/video/KruEd1Dhwcg/v-deo.html
That is part 1 out of 4. It moves from the oldest systems to the newest in the final part.
Can you do video about eastern mediterranean or Turkey vs Greece updated version. You are the best. HE DID
Plsss
Yes turkey Vs Greece
Or India 🇮🇳 vs Nepal 🇳🇵
@@buttegaming4872 not a comparison nepal will get crushed
maybe with french and italian support
Wow one of your best videos. Absolutely excellent discussion and introduction to how SAMs and their radars work. Learned much from watching this
Because a guest author made it. I did it :)
Here you can find more.
ua-cam.com/channels/zdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g.html
What a great job! I really want more of high detail analysis on this channel!
You need to do more video's like this
My line of work its just that, radars and stuff! I must say that i enjoyed this video very much
I’ve been watching Binkov for a while now! I loved his videos! As such, I made my own sci-fi/futurist channel!!
Generalissimus Binkov
Such high quality video. Very thank you Comissar Binkov.
I really loved this video. If you have paid attention in physics class, this video will interest you very much. Thanks Binkov for the video and the detailed analysis of S-25.
UA-cam year 2060: Was S-400, Russian Federation SAM system, ahead of its time?
HIMARS: no
what an elite video - most fascinating video I've ever seen in entire military videos congratulation
Very high quality work mr.Binkov. Can't wait for a part.2
This was fascinating. I don't care which weapon system you do next. If it's this good, I'm sold.
As the timeline dictates the SA-75 Dvina is the following.
Thank you for your video, Binkov! Much needed for any outsiders there that any, ANY SAMs are dangerous regardless of technology if you didn't put enough countermeasures in your aircraft.
And because of excellent UA-cam videos like this....
I don't have cable.
👍👍👍👍
I worked in navy radar as an avionics tech. This is accurate
Russia (2020)VS Soviet Union (1989)
This was gold, please keep it up. You just gained a subscriber.
Why isnt the voice matching Binkovs mouth movements?
Excellent video, thanks for using the original GRAU designations as main rather than the confusing NATO ones that often don't discriminate between variants!
Without using the original designations would be impossible to make the video.
This video is 100/100.
Molnibalage!! Is that you! VIP here from benchmarksims. Loved your 80's campaigns :)
Yes, that is me.
@@molnibalage83 Nice to see you unfold your knowledge proper on YT! Thanks for all you've done over the years!
This videos is so good, please do more about Soviet SAMs
A good length video after a long time
The best Military channel ever... Thank you brother. It will be Nice if for every video you give us some references.
🇩🇿 Mustapha from Algeria
Excellent! ... Thank you guys! (Well done Molni).
Love the graphics style!
I love this very in depth and detailed technical video
The next will come sooner than you think. ;)
More here.
ua-cam.com/channels/zdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g.html
In light of recent events, what we really need is a Turkey vs Greece video!
Pretty sure he has one of these already, have a searc h
Mathias Rust likes it.
:D
Also waiting for Mathias Rust/ Cesna plane vs S400 & modern Russian A2AD.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathias_Rust
Thanks for reminding. Hate to nitpick, but technically the Berkut had been phased out by 1984. At least according to that diagram in the video.
Now my brain hurts but it is "good pain".
If you are interested in soviet planes and rockets, and you are nearby, the museum called Reptár in Szolnok, Hungary worth a visit, at least 40 planes including a spitfire and a me 109 can be seen there. It's like 100 km from Budapest so it's not hard to get there
Excellent video. I would watch the crap out of a series of these videos.
This is a very good in-depth analysis.
Here you can find more.
I made this video as a guest here. :)
ua-cam.com/channels/zdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g.html
Not an easy feat to explain. Well done', very informative
This was really interesting. It'd be cool to see more videos like this.
What many don't know about the cute little frog in these videos is that he was a decorated SAM operator during the Cold War. He is credited with shooting down 1 SR-71 Spyplane, 2 B-47's, 4 Cessna's, a hang-glider, 20 hot air balloons and a cloud that really did look like a monster. Promoted and demoted a record 37 times, Binkov eventually made the rank of General and declared war on cats. After the Binkov-Feline War, as it was known in the east, he retired to a cabin in Minsk to drink the days away and watch videos of frogs mating.
Please check out my new book, available on Amazon: Great Fighter Jets of the Galaxy 1 by Tim Gibson. 100 full color pictures of futuristic jets.
I would like to see a video about the sam network in Hanoi during the Vietnam War
If the video receives enough attention... ;)
Its good to hear about the old Soviet Union and especially the S-25 missile system. The S-25 was tested by the U-2 flights over the Soviet Union from the mid-1950s. The system was not able to intercept a U-2 until 1960 when 14 SA-2 missiles were fired, one downing a MiG-19, before Gary Powers U-2 was hit.
I want to use this opportunity to thank the Beria family for what they accomplished for our country. Like father like son both had immense part in building not only our intelligence services and defence capabilities, but also our industry and enginieering in general as well. They and their efforts are not forgotten. Lavrentiy Pavlovitch's fall in the coup d'etat was a sad episode of soviet history. Lesser men deposed and killed him and stated a huge slander campaign that contunues on to this day.
Talking about multi-layered air defense system... damn....
next Episode: S75 and maybe also the AS 4 kitchen or at least early air to ground missiles
I would be quite hard to make a video alone the AS-4 and it would be pointless. Therefore you can guess what will be the next. ;)
wow so great
*thanks to all*
Great info. Love your channel.
one of you best videos.
The next will come sooner than you think about one of the iconic SAM system of the Cold War. ;)
More here.
ua-cam.com/channels/zdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g.html
It seems like a LOT of these systems could have been made a LOT safer if them just moved the command bunker 10 - 20 meters away from the electronics/ radars, via cables, so that anti-radiation missiles/ bomb strikes against the radars would not kill the operators in the bunkers. Maybe some concrete reinforcing, as with Vietnamese SA 2 sites wouldn't have gone amiss, either.
Someone: US would drop an atomic bomb on Moscow.
USSR: Don't worry comrades! Yo-Yo will save our motherland.
Really interesting video. I learned a lot from this material
This is a good video. Pls make a video with Hungary vs Serbia.
Or not.
Vajdaság nekünk azt cserébe megkaphatják Koszovót.
Could you please stop requesting this 1v1 scenario
Romania and Serbia vs Hungary and Austria or Ukraine
Croatia vs Serbia way more realistic. Or Serbia vs Albanian.
THIS, is THE best missile video EVER !!!
Here is continued the story.
ua-cam.com/channels/zdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g.html
Excellent.
An INCREDIBLE VIDEO!
The s 250 was very advanced and is still a threat today
There is not such SAM as S-250.
ua-cam.com/channels/zdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g.html
Muy buena la explicación
Very good!
Your videos is great!
Molnibalage is fucking everywhere.
Can you make a video on David Sling air defense system.
I do not know well that system. In fact most of current SAMs uses quite the same general principle, only their radar types and missiles are different. But exact data are classified. Making a detailed video with useful information is quite hard.
The best what is possible when all the major Russians SAMs are known and basics of the NASAMS2 and S-350 you can compare the main items on basic level but that is it. You can't find real usable data about missile maneuvering capability or anything. The principles and goals can be shown but such detailed style what you can see this video is not possible.
WoW Molnibalage!? :-D I know him from HTKA forums. We miss you dude!
I'm still active there.
@@molnibalage83 Igen, de a BiztPol. topikban már sajnos nem, én pedig nagyrészt ott olvasok.
@@joco94 Oda én nem járok. Amúgy se irhatok oda, de ha lehetséges lenne, akkor sem.
@@molnibalage83 Tiszta sor, attól még sajnálatos. :-)
do the same video with s-75 dvina
Just check the diagram at the beginning of the video. ;)
since teen years i developed interest in missiles and air defense. Berkut was known to me, pleasanter surprise. My short story - 'the hardest-desert scarab,' consists of defense engaging stand off munitions. Free reading by google search.
what instrument reads the radar and turns the fins of missile that guide it to the target and how does the mechanism work?
This is way to deep question to answer.
You need the blueprints of the systems. The principle of the system is the point of the video. You are asking not about "basic design" level but detail design.
@@molnibalage83 Excellent work!
(Másfél évet voltam Volkhovon, Sárbogárdon, ez a videó elég sok emléket felhozott. 😊)
@@imrekalman9044 Ha lesz folytatás, akkor még több emlék lesz. ;)
American pilots would describe “sams” as appearing as telephone poles hurtling up at them at supersonic speed!
Good man is Binkov!
Can you do a video on the Nike Ajax and Hercules system?
If the whole series get a green light following the Soviet SAMs it can be done.
Now do the S-75 next!
;)
In fact SA-75 then S-75. They were not the same.
Like No one can outmatch US in the air power similarly No one can match Russias SAMs. India purchased S400, which is a memoth with its technology and capabilities. But the specs of S500 are mind-blowing, especially it's range and reaction time 🙏
I think this system at whole is more complicated than S400 today!
In some way on operational level yes, especially because the very dangerous liquid fuel and lots of large mechanical parts.
S-25 as stationary and needing a large infrastructure maybe? S-75 had better mobility while still defending mostly stationary places. It all depends if you are talking Defense of a Country vs. Defense of an Army.
You should do one on the SA 3 next
Here is continued the story. The SA-3 was released some weeks ago.
ua-cam.com/channels/zdPKsRJUHVoitxBwxAkh-g.html
Yes
Question
Can we say that the Berkut system was equivalent to the US Nike system?
The Nike Ajax is a better example if we wish to make such a comparison but there are many differences between them regarding the missiles and radars.
Hopefully the series can run so long that US SAM systems can be presented too.
No ones commenting about how simplistic western assumptions of Soviet military capabilites , were ....lol
Hey Binkov, try to make a video about a modern replay of the American civil war...
Can you do a Future video to see who would win China or Unified Korea?
If possible, could you make a video were ww3 starts but no nukes and same morality just basic ww3 how it would play out would a side win or would it just be who survives the longest type of ww like for example ww1
Last time I was this early Russia was still a kingdom.
Russia was never a Kingdom. It was a Principality at first and then the Empire :-P
@@sockaccount8116 Not really. Orthodox rulers were called "Princes" by Roman Catholic Church with the aim of lowering their rank. But they called themselves "Knyaz", with the initial meaning of ''King'' (from Gothic "Kuningaz"). Only when the title of Tsar (Caеsar) was adopted by the Veliky (Great) Knyaz, the same process of lowering took place in Russian Language.
Can you do marine regiment/division vs the grand armée next
How effective would the A 10 Thunderbolt 2 be against naval assets. If the A 10 was used in defense of Taiwan how useful would it be?
Which A-10? A-10A or A-10C and against what naval asset? I short both in its era is quite ineffective against ships. The only longer range PGM during Cold War was the AGM-65 which is has much smaller range that just an air defense of a small frigate...
Quite the monster system for the 1950s
For some reason i feel a need to defend the skies of the Motherland after watching this...
if a missile/rocket motor has no turbopump but relies on pressure, maybe it's better to call it pressure-fed? then again if pressurizing gas is generated instead of stored separately it might make sense to call it a gas generator cycle even though 'gas generator cycle' usually implies 'gas is produced to power turbopumps to pump fuel'
If you think through it would be pointless such term. Because if you have pump what does the pump do? Increase pressure. Any fluid is pressure fed. The question is what provides the pressure.
Please do Greece vs Turkey with french and italian support
Soviets were always ahead in two areas: anti-air missiles and small arms.
This is not exactly true.
In fact the first mobile SARH guided SAM with CW illumination was the HAWK. IOC 1960.
For the Soviets the 2K12M Kub, the really fist reliable variant was available about 6-7 years later.
The Nike Ajax and Hercules combined wit SAGE were such advanced that we cannot speak about 'ahead'.
The US and western SAMs are generally less known because they are barely or not at all were used in combat comparing to Soviet SAMs.
@@molnibalage83 I was referring to AA missiles in general. Like the R-73 which was at its time, unrivaled among short range IR missles.
@@andro7862 Which is also not true. The only unique capability of the R-73 was the TVC.
The HOBS capability was available in small scale. The F-14J (Block 45 and 46 series) and on F-4N in 1970 was available a helmet mounted sight with AIM-9H. It was considered too complex, heavy and unpractical the system and they discarded. But it was 13+ years ahead of the USSR. Then the US Navy switched to Hornet good slow speed pitch authority instead HOBS.
www.best-of-flightgear.dk/vtas.htm
Otherwise the R-73 was just and upscaled R-60M with TVC and better seeker gimbal. It is just arrived later and more hyped.
Also tanks the T-64 is the first MBT to have composite armour layout ,smooth bore gun that enter mass production and for an entire decade NATO has nothing similar.
@@molnibalage83 But it never entered service. The R-73 did.
If you check the Nasa web site out there is a 4 part publication Called "Rockets and People" that covers the development of Soviet Missile, Rocket and space Technology. The Story of how the S-25 system came about is covered in one of them.