Non-Disclosure Agreements and a Creative Workaround

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8

  • @johnferrellesq.
    @johnferrellesq.  2 роки тому

    Speak With an Attorney: call 650 - 812 - 3408 or email info@carrferrell.com
    Send an email to johnferrellesq.news@carrferrell.com to subscribe to our newsletter!

  • @sophies674
    @sophies674 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you for informing us 🤗🤗🤗

  • @sadeghyeganehzadeh289
    @sadeghyeganehzadeh289 7 місяців тому

    Great.

    • @johnferrellesq.
      @johnferrellesq.  6 місяців тому

      Thank you for the kind comment. I am curious what other types of videos you watch. Are there other entrepreneur topics I could address that you would be interested in watching? Warmest wishes, --john

  • @johnappleseed6926
    @johnappleseed6926 2 роки тому +1

    Hey I have a question about patents. Please can you explain this scenario. Person A makes a grocery bag with buttons to prevent things from falling out. Person A has a patent for their invention. Later on Person B makes pretty much the exact same grocery bag but with a zipper instead. Person B does not have a patent. Is person B infringing on person A’s patent?

    • @johnferrellesq.
      @johnferrellesq.  2 роки тому +1

      Hi John A. Thank you for the question. Infringement is determined by the patent claims at the end of the patent. First let's assume the patent claim recites: a Grocery Bag having four side walls and buttons to seal the bag. In this case a competing bag with a zipper instead of buttons would not infringe. However, if instead the patent claim recites: a Grocery Bag having four side walls and a closing mechanism to seal the bag, then both the button bag and the zipper bag would infringe the patent since both of these are closing mechanisms. Hope this helps. 😊 -john

    • @sadeghyeganehzadeh289
      @sadeghyeganehzadeh289 6 місяців тому

      even if the type of closing mechanism is not determined in the description?