With regards to my refutation of particular individuals/groups that I have been refuting addressing over the past two years. It is quint-essential for us to understand that the methodology of Takfir that is embedded part of their practice; however, the question which arises, is this takfiri tendency something which is new to this hizib, or is this a tradition which has been practiced by the founders on the Najdiya? This video covers some of the historical context pertaining to the life of Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab and the Takfir that he made and the resulting consequence of his Takfir. We also gain a better perspective of this methodology and the lengths and efforts this methodology goes in to exacting its takfir! #BroHajji #Salafis #Najdis
What’s the end game here especially considering what’s going on with the increased hostile activities against Islam i understand your motivation but I am talking here about the wisdom of timing prioritization of what is more important to confront in war in medicine in life in general there is a obligation to assess and understand the nature of threats the basic wisdom then of survival is to address the threats in relation to there significance as potential level Of threat my brother in Islam it’s home ho cut this s-t and seek go organize your become that cemented line the Quran talks about pool your resources and intellect and talents Allah. Has given all of you friends sympathizers and antagonist go meet and defeat the major threat whip hell out of them then once three threat is silenced and. Subdued intellectually then if the urge still moves the collective of you then discuss your issues as Muslims IMAN atmosphere that’s free and secure of threats is that go damned much to ask is it go much to ask to present a united front that endeavor will produce the favor of Allah that is almost beyond words to articulate in this life and the next live the Muslim greeting UNITE AND DEFEAT as ONE
I mean the Quran talks about how the enemies will united against you then directs us to unite therefore as one against them . Notice how Christian anti Islamic apologist are uniting and I mean people that normally that not SPIT on a spark plug to help there cars 🚗 now for the first time u see them on each other’s shows sharing thoughts and pooling there resources in a united effort against Islam DAM I T WAKE THE HELL. UP who will be the first among you to call for a united front to pool your talents and the guidance given you by Allah who will be the first of you to call for the greater value of the collective good of Islam and the believers who ?
@@PoesieIslamiquewhat a clown . Did u watch the video ? Did u see the evidences from your own books that he did blanket and chain takfeer on anyone who didn’t support him ? Do u reject that ?
Let's be clear: When MIAW followers, to this day, talk of MIAW 'purging Arabia of shirk' what they mean is that somehow in the space of 1000 years after the Rashidun caliphate the Arabian peninsular has so radically regressed to paganism that when MIAW and his followers arrive on the scene the tribes of Arabia had become not that different from Hindus (i.e. actual idol worshippers). If you genuinely think that then you're illiterate about history, if you don't believe those murdered tribespeople weren't pseudo-Hindus then you're shameless as well as intellectually dishonest for being a partisan hack or if you believe those tribes were 'misguided' (i.e. non-Athari) then how could you morally justify a level of slaughter that verges on genocide? The MIAW crowd are dangerous because their apologia material (i.e. literature and audio white-wash of MIAW) is not only a 'gateway' intellectual drug to Daeesh ideology but Daeesh themselves often rope in recruits by showing to recent converts from Wahaabism how it's Daeesh, not Madhkalism, is the true heir to MIAW and his teachings. If you want to undermine Daeesh your undermine the sugar-coating of MIAW not praise him. Defend and praise MIAW and you'll stupidly create an recruitment icon into Daeesh the same way Communists use the icon of Che Guevera to recruit people into communism. BTW Let me repeat again: No one is saying don't be Athari, Ibn Taymiyyah is a great theologian, and no one is saying don't be a Athari who subscribes to Hanbali fiqh as even the Ashaari and Maturidi acknowledge Ahmed Ibn Hanbal as an imam of fiqh. What you're guys are being warned off on is to not be a MIAW fanboy as it can potentially lead you to a very dark place (i.e. Daeesh recruitment or susceptible to Daeesh takfiri propoganda).
Very well said... Also if further proof is needed brother.... Just look at what these teachings create. Isis ,daessh, al juhaymaein, the madkhalis, al qaeda and the list goes on. Just chaos after chaos. Pure KHAWARIJ mentality all across the board. May Allah SWT protect us
True story: about 5 years ago in Madina at Jannat al baqi I overheard some Pakistani brethren speaking in urdu about the state of the ummah. They were saying the issue is salfies everywhere. Even at the graveyard we are condemned to witnessing salfi behaviour. I thought to myself that sectarianism has hit everywhere even those visiting such holiest of places. I only realised later they were talking about selfies 😂 #حسن الظن
That's good because some super salafees in my country are blind in geography they even denied that Diriyah located in Najd, they denied it by saying Najd is in Iraq
@@yousifaltigani9838 bro bro hajji is critizing the saudis, it's likely the first saudi state expansiinsm idiology that abused the dawah of. Tawhed not the dawah itself, even MIAW wrong we still have Ibn Taimiyaj
I've sat with ulema of al Ahsaa , the Aal Mubarak clan in particular, a clan renowned for ilm and ulema , throughout the Jazeera , strong and firm upon the sunna, and I can tell you, they have not forgot the massacres and bloodshed perpetrated upon them by the najdi proxies of the Anglo saxon colonialists..
If you could edit this video by adding the Volume and Page Numbers as some brothers are asking me where are the references AND give a brief intro on the main 3 books and their authors used here, Durrar Saniyyah, An'wanul Najd, Ta'reekhul Najd, because some them are so thick sadly, JZKL Then I will spread the link to this video on the latest videos of the various Salafis of the West.
Asalamu alakum bro Hajji May Allah swt reward u @brohajji I showed all the screen shots to these hard headed salafis and they were so in denial they are asking for the page numbers Is it possible for you to reference the volume and page? If it’s no trouble Jazak Allah kheirn
What kinda logic is that to say that they were righteous and that is why they were victorious? Then how about Ottomans ruling so many lands, conquering Istanbul especially when there is a specific hadith to that and being victorious in so many wars etc.? So they weren't righteous and they were mushriks and khafirs? What kinda logic is that? And how can you guarantee that Saudi will never collapse?
@@muhammadabdulmateen8473 you can believe it doesn’t but so many scholars say it is! Because for some, if they accept that this Hadith is linked to sultan Mehmed, their whole ideology/aqeedah will collapse! That is why they are claiming it is not linked.
@@ac-go4np Narrated Mu'adh ibn Jabal: The Prophet (ﷺ) said: The flourishing state of Jerusalem will be when Yathrib is in ruins, the ruined state of Yathrib will be when the great war comes, the outbreak of the great war will be at the conquest of Constantinople and the conquest of Constantinople when the Dajjal (Antichrist) comes forth. He (the Prophet) struck his thigh or his shoulder with his hand and said: This is as true as you are here or as you are sitting (meaning Mu'adh ibn Jabal). حَدَّثَنَا عَبَّاسٌ الْعَنْبَرِيُّ، حَدَّثَنَا هَاشِمُ بْنُ الْقَاسِمِ، حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ ثَابِتِ بْنِ ثَوْبَانَ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ مَكْحُولٍ، عَنْ جُبَيْرِ بْنِ نُفَيْرٍ، عَنْ مَالِكِ بْنِ يُخَامِرَ، عَنْ مُعَاذِ بْنِ جَبَلٍ، قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم " عُمْرَانُ بَيْتِ الْمَقْدِسِ خَرَابُ يَثْرِبَ وَخَرَابُ يَثْرِبَ خُرُوجُ الْمَلْحَمَةِ وَخُرُوجُ الْمَلْحَمَةِ فَتْحُ قُسْطَنْطِينِيَّةَ وَفَتْحُ الْقُسْطَنْطِينِيَّةِ خُرُوجُ الدَّجَّالِ " . ثُمَّ ضَرَبَ بِيَدِهِ عَلَى فَخِذِ الَّذِي حَدَّثَ - أَوْ مَنْكِبِهِ - ثُمَّ قَالَ إِنَّ هَذَا لَحَقٌّ كَمَا أَنَّكَ هَا هُنَا أَوْ كَمَا أَنَّكَ قَاعِدٌ . يَعْنِي مُعَاذَ بْنَ جَبَلٍ . Grade: Hasan (Al-Albani) حسن (الألباني)حكم So which great war is it? And whrs dajjal? Is yathrib in ruins? And jerusalem flourishing? Using one hadith to affirm a event is wrong. Thr are many hadith which contradicts it and this is one of them.
@@muhammadabdulmateen8473 What about the hadith: "The city of Constantinople shall be conquered. What a great leader its leader will be, and what a good army is that army." Why did the companions of the prophet, dispatch numerous armies to attempt conquer Constantinople? Including Abu Ayubal Ansari r.a. who hosted, the Prophet s.a.w. when he came to Madina, tried to conquer Constantinople. Was there a great war? Dajjal? Is yathrib in ruins? And Jerusalem flourishing? So companions of the Prophet s.a.w. didn't understand The Prophet s.a.w.? Just reading the hadith and making your own interpretation is wrong imo. We should stick with generations of scholars and not ignore what they have been saying Also even it wasn't meant for Sultan Mehmed, that doesn't negate the fact that Ottoman Empire was victorious, and by their own logic Ottoman Empire was righteous!
@@ac-go4np which numerous army went to conquer ? How many times did they conquer? And if u rely on this understanding that it was 1453 thn why would the prophet peace and blessings be upon him praised a leader which practiced fratricide? Is it allowed in islam? Did any righteous caliphs did that? And even if its meant for 1453 thn how would a 2nd conquest take at the same place? Other hadiths says it will be at the end times which the conquest will take place , means now istanbul is in turkey lands which is muslim majority , and it means a muslim army will conquer a muslim land to take constantinopole? Does it make sense?
@@muneerahmed9878 Probably because he isn't a Salafi like you? He is Athari and Hanafi. What's the problem, unless you plan to do takfeer of him as well? Besides he has shown up plenty of Salafi's by now, yet you still try to nit pick his supposed flaws. You are at best a blind follower, which is an amusing irony.
@@muneerahmed9878 he is talking about MiAw , hr is doing tahdzer on him , you can still follow Ibn Taimiyah and Ibn Qayyim , athari doesn't same with Miaw
@@muneerahmed9878 Super-Salafis hide behind the phrase: “Qur’an and Sunnah” But they really don’t care to stay true to its meaning when it comes to justifying their rhetoric and flawed methodology.
Al-Tirmidhi narrated that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said to Mu’adh (may Allah be pleased with him), after teaching him some of the laws of Islam, “Shall I not tell you what is the foundation of all that?” I [Mu’adh] said: “Of course, O Prophet of Allah.” He took hold of his tongue and said, “Control this.” I said, “O Prophet of Allah, will we be held responsible for what we say with it?” He said, “May your mother be bereft of you, O Mu’adh! Will the people be thrown into Hell on their faces or on their noses for anything other than the harvest of their tongues?” Classed as saheeh by al-Albani.
What's your point? How is reading the history of the murder and bloodshed perpetrated by kaafir najdis who were and still are servants of the Anglo saxons , related to the Hadith you inappropriately quoted ?
As-salamu 3aleikum. I used to consider MIAW as a scholar but i gradually understood that he put his principles too far and neglected ayat of Quran about kufr that did not match with his mass takfir. Last summer, in my garden, I burned all his books that i used to have. Al hamdulillah for opening my eyes about this takfiri kharidji. Here, in France, salafis from all tendancies consider him as a great scholar.
Oui en France on le considère car on est sur la vérité on a pas été lavé comme toi al hamdulilah. Seul un ignorant ou un sectaire peut bruler les livres de sheikh al islam
Da'gwa Tow-head is a more correct description of them. Who was also killed in a masjiyd... oh yeah 'Aliy ibn Abiy 'Taalib KmW, the first Muslim leader to combat the 1st iteration of the Khawaarij. As if an indication pattern for those with healthy minds to see. Anyways... Khawaarij by nature call people to go into the Qur^aan (and Sunna) directly by themselves and bypassing the 'ulamaa. But what interesting is the last iteration of Khawaarij, the Khawaarij of Akhiruzzamaan, will abandon Al-Ma'hdiy RHM and follow Dajjaal. An 180° contrast. In other words, the last iteration of Khawaarij are fond of deceptions, deceits and manipulation of truth. Will wonder never cease.
@36:56 needs correction. Ibn saud sets the condition that he continues to take taxes from people as he used to do before (this type of taxing / form of jyzya taken from muslims is not permissible). Muhammad ibn Abdulwahab responds that he hopes that Allah will gives him more than that from the ghaneema he will get so that he won't need to take taxes anymore.
Sulaiman abdul waahab( brother of abdul waahab) wrote a critical book on Muhammad abdul waahab. Iv been looking for this book in English. If someone has a extra one to donate or know its name or where I can get it, I like to read it.
@@omarov_1974 Bakr Abu Zayd and `Abd al-Rahman `Uthaymin, the two Wahhabi editors of Ibn Humayd al-Najdi's Hanbali bio-dictionary _al-Suhub al-Wabila `ala Dara'ih al-Hanabila_ (Risala ed. 2:679), consider the report of that repentence spurious and say there is no proof that Sulayman ever changed his mind.
@@omarov_1974 no he didn't that was a fabrication from miaw hard-core supporters it is said he was put under home arrest until moaw and Saud died then he left the place and Continued to promote and speak against miaw and Saud alliance The claim he repented came a 100 years after his death from not even a eye witness but a miaw follower to defend his sheikh from getting exposed
astagfirullah. He was a great imam, you shouldn't say such things and confuse the community. Couple months back I had zero knowledge and videos like these would only drive me away from the deen, every1 refuting eachother etc. Please realise this is harmful. Alhamdulillah ever since I've only focused on taking knowledge from scholars (although I struggled to get here) my imaan has become stronger. Dear reader, I request you to leave all these youtubers and focus on your own deen. Read books, study etc and never forget knowledge is not taken from UA-cam clips. You can ask me for any suggestions if you need help
These salfies take advantage of people naieviety to misguide into believing miaw was this mujahid. The truth is he was a khawrij who has the blood of muslim on his hands
Sheikh albani on sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul wahab الألباني: محمد بن عبدالوهاب فيه غلو وشده Albani considered Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab a reformer and praised his Da’wah, but he also criticized him for their excessive Takfir. Albani says about Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab: - He had exaggeration and harshness - His followers inherited that from his teachings - He could not differentiate between authentic [صحيح] and weak [ضعيف] Ahadith - He had no high level of care in following Salafi Fiqh - I am one of the harshest critics of the Wahabiyah 1- Albani said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 297): الحقيقة محمد بن عبدالوهاب فضله كبير على الأمة الإسلامية ؛ لكن فيه شيء من الغلو والشدة الجماعة كان عندهم شيء من الشدة؛ أخذوها طبعاً من بعض نصوص محمد بن عبدالوهاب رحمه الله، واستمر الأتباع إلى هذا العهد موصومون بهذه الشدة، وكنا نسمع نحن قديماً أن هؤلاء النجديين يكفرون عامة المسلمين، أو يقولون عنهم خوارج “The truth regarding Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhab is that he has done a great favour upon the Islamic nation, but he had some level of exaggeration and harshness. … This group has inherited some of this harshness, which they of course took from the writings of Mohammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab, may God be merciful to him. They are stigmatised with this harshness. And we used to hear from long time ago that these Najdis make Takfir on the general masses of the Muslims, and they used to be accused of being Khawarij.” 2- Albani said after he mentioned some good qualities of Ibn Taymiyah: , بخلاف الشيخ محمد بن عبد الوهاب, فلم تكن له هذه العناية, لا في الحديث ولا في الفقه السلفي, فهو من الناحية المذهبية حنبلي, ومن الناحية الحديثية كغيره, فليس له آثار في الفقه تدلنا على أنه كابن تيمية سلفي المنهج في التفقه في الدين, لعل له في ذلك عذرا كما ألمحنا إليه آنفا.وكذلك في الأحاديث فهو كغيره مع الأسف الشديد, لا معرفة عنده بالحديث الصحيح والضعيف “Contrary to Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab - who did not have this level of care in hadith nor in Salafi fiqh. He is a Hanbali from the side of the madhhab and in Hadith, he is like others. He has left no traces in Fiqh which would indicate to us that he was like Ibn Taymiyah a Salafi in manhaj in terms of his understanding of religion. Perhaps he has an excuse in this which we have already hinted at. And also in the hadith, he, like the others, unfortunately, has no knowledge of authentic or weak hadiths.” 3- Albani also said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 713): أما الوهابية: فما لي ولها ؛ فأنا أنقضها ؛ ربما أشد من غيري ، وربما الحاضرون يعلمون ذلك “As for al-Wahabiyah - what have I got to do with it?! I criticise it - sometimes even more than others! Those who are present know this.”
4:10 initial claim thoght of neo salafis 8:00 1160 - 1232 MIAW slaughtered inside and outside of najd 9:33 stain on the ummah 15:00 non compliance with MIAW thoughts and non entry under the dawla of miaw made you a mushrik 15:39 yemeni hujaj - spoke to najdis and the najdis claimed yemenis to be kuffar -EXTREMISM sHAWKANI SPOKE FIRST Hand to witnesses 17:52 Najdis themselves state tat if you weren't part 0f their dawla you are an apostate 18:24 ADdurr us sanniya If they dont enter the obedience of MIS this is ridda Those that support turks are also apostates obligatory to do jihad against those tribes that support turks 23:25 Muslims called mushrikeen because they support turks - also these people are to be fought against and killed 25:07 Saudi clerics views on historicity of miaw dawla methodology and beliefs miaw and his offpsring believed that they were the only muslims in Arab peninsula/ planet 26:39 1157 to 1232 blanket takfeer, chain takfeer, massacre, killng, looting, 27:25 Unwan al majd fi tarikh al najd year 1157 ah Initially AW was in tribe of huraymilah then he moved to dirriyah MBS convinced by his wife to align with ibn abdul wahab initial conversation Glad tidings on victory and who ever clings and aids tawheed allah will give them control to land Ibn abdul wahab claims all najd is on shirk He hopes saud becomes imam and his offspring. 1st meeting - !!! you scratch my back i scratch yours 35:52 Ibn saud wants his bayah and is given Discussin war booty and ghaneema 38:42 IAW writes letters of leaders of provinces. Some accepted, some didnt, some belittled him/ in response to this iaw ordered jihad against these muslims 41:20
Salam Brother, I am shia and I know we have a lot of disagreements but, I really like hearing you talk. The first Video of you I saw was so annoying because you were eating and I hate those noises but the rest of it were very good! specifically those against the sufi lokman guy. may Allah bless you.
1:19:45 brother hajji this statement you made is clear Irjaa and not the aqeedah of the sahaba You can not be a muwwahhid that commits shirk Nor can you be a mushrik that is also a muwwahhid Sad to hear this from you
@@FreddieGamingHD because he is defending the infidel grave worshipers now and spread the accusations against the imams of najd just because his problems with the madkhalies
@@ahmedfarahat8489 no he isn't grave worshipping is one thing and bandit looting fake takfir is another matter majority muslim were jot committing those shirk there were those who were but to declare a whole country kafir and on the same page as then is nothing more then a 9ver exegerated claim
@@ahmedfarahat8489 Sheikh albani on sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul wahab الألباني: محمد بن عبدالوهاب فيه غلو وشده Albani considered Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab a reformer and praised his Da’wah, but he also criticized him for their excessive Takfir. Albani says about Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab: - He had exaggeration and harshness - His followers inherited that from his teachings - He could not differentiate between authentic [صحيح] and weak [ضعيف] Ahadith - He had no high level of care in following Salafi Fiqh - I am one of the harshest critics of the Wahabiyah 1- Albani said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 297): الحقيقة محمد بن عبدالوهاب فضله كبير على الأمة الإسلامية ؛ لكن فيه شيء من الغلو والشدة الجماعة كان عندهم شيء من الشدة؛ أخذوها طبعاً من بعض نصوص محمد بن عبدالوهاب رحمه الله، واستمر الأتباع إلى هذا العهد موصومون بهذه الشدة، وكنا نسمع نحن قديماً أن هؤلاء النجديين يكفرون عامة المسلمين، أو يقولون عنهم خوارج “The truth regarding Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhab is that he has done a great favour upon the Islamic nation, but he had some level of exaggeration and harshness. … This group has inherited some of this harshness, which they of course took from the writings of Mohammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab, may God be merciful to him. They are stigmatised with this harshness. And we used to hear from long time ago that these Najdis make Takfir on the general masses of the Muslims, and they used to be accused of being Khawarij.” 2- Albani said after he mentioned some good qualities of Ibn Taymiyah: , بخلاف الشيخ محمد بن عبد الوهاب, فلم تكن له هذه العناية, لا في الحديث ولا في الفقه السلفي, فهو من الناحية المذهبية حنبلي, ومن الناحية الحديثية كغيره, فليس له آثار في الفقه تدلنا على أنه كابن تيمية سلفي المنهج في التفقه في الدين, لعل له في ذلك عذرا كما ألمحنا إليه آنفا.وكذلك في الأحاديث فهو كغيره مع الأسف الشديد, لا معرفة عنده بالحديث الصحيح والضعيف “Contrary to Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab - who did not have this level of care in hadith nor in Salafi fiqh. He is a Hanbali from the side of the madhhab and in Hadith, he is like others. He has left no traces in Fiqh which would indicate to us that he was like Ibn Taymiyah a Salafi in manhaj in terms of his understanding of religion. Perhaps he has an excuse in this which we have already hinted at. And also in the hadith, he, like the others, unfortunately, has no knowledge of authentic or weak hadiths.” 3- Albani also said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 713): أما الوهابية: فما لي ولها ؛ فأنا أنقضها ؛ ربما أشد من غيري ، وربما الحاضرون يعلمون ذلك “As for al-Wahabiyah - what have I got to do with it?! I criticise it - sometimes even more than others! Those who are present know this.”
I love how lay people have been forced into choosing an Aqeeda for themselves, when this should only apply for the knowledgeable amongst us and those interested in learning. Can thank certain Athari's for this too, though I personally subscribe to none as I believe being able to practice your religion has no Ikhtilaaf amongst any of the Aqa'id.
Just read ONE book of Muhamad ibnul Wahhaab you tell us if this boy is mentally stable. Same way the raafidee shia is using past mistakes of some salaf to fight ahlul sunnah wal jamaa’ah. So this boy is saying shaik uthaymeen,shaikh bin Baz…all are misguided????
Misguided indeed ..all of them...what you fail to realise is that the ibn saud - salafi religion, is an ethno centric, nationalist religion which , is why, the "zeal" for tauhid to be spread, ends at the borders of the modern day zionist/saudi/wahhabite state? I'll tell you, its because they weren't fighting for tauhid, but dunya..
No he is saying aqeedah wise miaw was right but his political works are a mess Sheikh albani on sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul wahab الألباني: محمد بن عبدالوهاب فيه غلو وشده Albani considered Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab a reformer and praised his Da’wah, but he also criticized him for their excessive Takfir. Albani says about Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab: - He had exaggeration and harshness - His followers inherited that from his teachings - He could not differentiate between authentic [صحيح] and weak [ضعيف] Ahadith - He had no high level of care in following Salafi Fiqh - I am one of the harshest critics of the Wahabiyah 1- Albani said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 297): الحقيقة محمد بن عبدالوهاب فضله كبير على الأمة الإسلامية ؛ لكن فيه شيء من الغلو والشدة الجماعة كان عندهم شيء من الشدة؛ أخذوها طبعاً من بعض نصوص محمد بن عبدالوهاب رحمه الله، واستمر الأتباع إلى هذا العهد موصومون بهذه الشدة، وكنا نسمع نحن قديماً أن هؤلاء النجديين يكفرون عامة المسلمين، أو يقولون عنهم خوارج “The truth regarding Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhab is that he has done a great favour upon the Islamic nation, but he had some level of exaggeration and harshness. … This group has inherited some of this harshness, which they of course took from the writings of Mohammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab, may God be merciful to him. They are stigmatised with this harshness. And we used to hear from long time ago that these Najdis make Takfir on the general masses of the Muslims, and they used to be accused of being Khawarij.” 2- Albani said after he mentioned some good qualities of Ibn Taymiyah: , بخلاف الشيخ محمد بن عبد الوهاب, فلم تكن له هذه العناية, لا في الحديث ولا في الفقه السلفي, فهو من الناحية المذهبية حنبلي, ومن الناحية الحديثية كغيره, فليس له آثار في الفقه تدلنا على أنه كابن تيمية سلفي المنهج في التفقه في الدين, لعل له في ذلك عذرا كما ألمحنا إليه آنفا.وكذلك في الأحاديث فهو كغيره مع الأسف الشديد, لا معرفة عنده بالحديث الصحيح والضعيف “Contrary to Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab - who did not have this level of care in hadith nor in Salafi fiqh. He is a Hanbali from the side of the madhhab and in Hadith, he is like others. He has left no traces in Fiqh which would indicate to us that he was like Ibn Taymiyah a Salafi in manhaj in terms of his understanding of religion. Perhaps he has an excuse in this which we have already hinted at. And also in the hadith, he, like the others, unfortunately, has no knowledge of authentic or weak hadiths.” 3- Albani also said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 713): أما الوهابية: فما لي ولها ؛ فأنا أنقضها ؛ ربما أشد من غيري ، وربما الحاضرون يعلمون ذلك “As for al-Wahabiyah - what have I got to do with it?! I criticise it - sometimes even more than others! Those who are present know this.”
2:28:03 "mentally deranged freak", that's not a nice way to speak of a muslim brother....Why is he mentally deranged, that is very harsh, even if you don't agree with him.
True.. That's what I mean, we have as an ummah stooped to a low level. There are other ways of making a point, than using this kind of language. Practice of eloquence and making a point would strengthen the ummah and generate a whole lot of respect from everywhere. Eloquence was a mark of distinction among so many sahabah and prophet Muhammad himself, sAaws, and many muslims after them, let's remember that and follow their example. Foul language and behavior will only give the islamophobes reason to ridicule us.
Sheikh albani on sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul wahab الألباني: محمد بن عبدالوهاب فيه غلو وشده Albani considered Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab a reformer and praised his Da’wah, but he also criticized him for their excessive Takfir. Albani says about Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab: - He had exaggeration and harshness - His followers inherited that from his teachings - He could not differentiate between authentic [صحيح] and weak [ضعيف] Ahadith - He had no high level of care in following Salafi Fiqh - I am one of the harshest critics of the Wahabiyah 1- Albani said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 297): الحقيقة محمد بن عبدالوهاب فضله كبير على الأمة الإسلامية ؛ لكن فيه شيء من الغلو والشدة الجماعة كان عندهم شيء من الشدة؛ أخذوها طبعاً من بعض نصوص محمد بن عبدالوهاب رحمه الله، واستمر الأتباع إلى هذا العهد موصومون بهذه الشدة، وكنا نسمع نحن قديماً أن هؤلاء النجديين يكفرون عامة المسلمين، أو يقولون عنهم خوارج “The truth regarding Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhab is that he has done a great favour upon the Islamic nation, but he had some level of exaggeration and harshness. … This group has inherited some of this harshness, which they of course took from the writings of Mohammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab, may God be merciful to him. They are stigmatised with this harshness. And we used to hear from long time ago that these Najdis make Takfir on the general masses of the Muslims, and they used to be accused of being Khawarij.” 2- Albani said after he mentioned some good qualities of Ibn Taymiyah: , بخلاف الشيخ محمد بن عبد الوهاب, فلم تكن له هذه العناية, لا في الحديث ولا في الفقه السلفي, فهو من الناحية المذهبية حنبلي, ومن الناحية الحديثية كغيره, فليس له آثار في الفقه تدلنا على أنه كابن تيمية سلفي المنهج في التفقه في الدين, لعل له في ذلك عذرا كما ألمحنا إليه آنفا.وكذلك في الأحاديث فهو كغيره مع الأسف الشديد, لا معرفة عنده بالحديث الصحيح والضعيف “Contrary to Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab - who did not have this level of care in hadith nor in Salafi fiqh. He is a Hanbali from the side of the madhhab and in Hadith, he is like others. He has left no traces in Fiqh which would indicate to us that he was like Ibn Taymiyah a Salafi in manhaj in terms of his understanding of religion. Perhaps he has an excuse in this which we have already hinted at. And also in the hadith, he, like the others, unfortunately, has no knowledge of authentic or weak hadiths.” 3- Albani also said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 713): أما الوهابية: فما لي ولها ؛ فأنا أنقضها ؛ ربما أشد من غيري ، وربما الحاضرون يعلمون ذلك “As for al-Wahabiyah - what have I got to do with it?! I criticise it - sometimes even more than others! Those who are present know this.”
Sheikh albani on sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul wahab الألباني: محمد بن عبدالوهاب فيه غلو وشده Albani considered Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab a reformer and praised his Da’wah, but he also criticized him for their excessive Takfir. Albani says about Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab: - He had exaggeration and harshness - His followers inherited that from his teachings - He could not differentiate between authentic [صحيح] and weak [ضعيف] Ahadith - He had no high level of care in following Salafi Fiqh - I am one of the harshest critics of the Wahabiyah 1- Albani said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 297): الحقيقة محمد بن عبدالوهاب فضله كبير على الأمة الإسلامية ؛ لكن فيه شيء من الغلو والشدة الجماعة كان عندهم شيء من الشدة؛ أخذوها طبعاً من بعض نصوص محمد بن عبدالوهاب رحمه الله، واستمر الأتباع إلى هذا العهد موصومون بهذه الشدة، وكنا نسمع نحن قديماً أن هؤلاء النجديين يكفرون عامة المسلمين، أو يقولون عنهم خوارج “The truth regarding Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhab is that he has done a great favour upon the Islamic nation, but he had some level of exaggeration and harshness. … This group has inherited some of this harshness, which they of course took from the writings of Mohammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab, may God be merciful to him. They are stigmatised with this harshness. And we used to hear from long time ago that these Najdis make Takfir on the general masses of the Muslims, and they used to be accused of being Khawarij.” 2- Albani said after he mentioned some good qualities of Ibn Taymiyah: , بخلاف الشيخ محمد بن عبد الوهاب, فلم تكن له هذه العناية, لا في الحديث ولا في الفقه السلفي, فهو من الناحية المذهبية حنبلي, ومن الناحية الحديثية كغيره, فليس له آثار في الفقه تدلنا على أنه كابن تيمية سلفي المنهج في التفقه في الدين, لعل له في ذلك عذرا كما ألمحنا إليه آنفا.وكذلك في الأحاديث فهو كغيره مع الأسف الشديد, لا معرفة عنده بالحديث الصحيح والضعيف “Contrary to Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab - who did not have this level of care in hadith nor in Salafi fiqh. He is a Hanbali from the side of the madhhab and in Hadith, he is like others. He has left no traces in Fiqh which would indicate to us that he was like Ibn Taymiyah a Salafi in manhaj in terms of his understanding of religion. Perhaps he has an excuse in this which we have already hinted at. And also in the hadith, he, like the others, unfortunately, has no knowledge of authentic or weak hadiths.” 3- Albani also said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 713): أما الوهابية: فما لي ولها ؛ فأنا أنقضها ؛ ربما أشد من غيري ، وربما الحاضرون يعلمون ذلك “As for al-Wahabiyah - what have I got to do with it?! I criticise it - sometimes even more than others! Those who are present know this.”
@@mohammadmubeen6701 they are afghans who fought the illegal occupation of foreign powers and they took back their home. As we see in the world, nobody does any attacks in their name because they dont call for it. Not like the other extreme grps which is mentioned in the video whr they call people who supported them to kill innocent non muslims and muslims alike . Time will tell if they are truthful to what the afghans have fought for and supported.
اعوذ بالله ... لا أرى في هذا الشخص الا جاهل عندما يتم تكفير او ان يتهم الاموات فبتعدوا عنه اشهد بالله اني اكرهك في الله واسال الله ان يكشف سرك امام الجميع
Fix up, he's giving historical facts , where the problem? Or do you also believe that the cradle of islam had become populated by musriks..research before you answer..oh, and your Arabic is atrocious , but keep it up.
@@ZubairAhmed-od2xv historical facts !! How do you know it's historical facts? Do you have the tools and methods to verify the historcsl claim? At least use your brain. لا حرج في أنك لم تفهم اللغه العربية وأنت تستخدم قوقل لترجمه ولكن أن تقول لشخص ولد عربيا بان لغته شنيعه فهذا قمة الهراء. دعنا من هذا في الواقع عندما اطلعت على ردودك اكتشفت انك شخص غبي بالفطره لا تملك ادوات التحقق والمقارنه والاستدال وانما تنصاع للجهال امثالك . عندما يصل الشخص لمرحله التكفير و يتساهل في رمي التهم فقد وقع في الضلال اسال الله ان يحرس عقولنا وديننا من افكاركم الضاله والمنحرف. نصيحه لا تتساهل في تكفير مسلم فانت محاسب في يوم لا ينفع فيه الندم والحسره.
Sheikh albani on sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul wahab الألباني: محمد بن عبدالوهاب فيه غلو وشده Albani considered Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab a reformer and praised his Da’wah, but he also criticized him for their excessive Takfir. Albani says about Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab: - He had exaggeration and harshness - His followers inherited that from his teachings - He could not differentiate between authentic [صحيح] and weak [ضعيف] Ahadith - He had no high level of care in following Salafi Fiqh - I am one of the harshest critics of the Wahabiyah 1- Albani said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 297): الحقيقة محمد بن عبدالوهاب فضله كبير على الأمة الإسلامية ؛ لكن فيه شيء من الغلو والشدة الجماعة كان عندهم شيء من الشدة؛ أخذوها طبعاً من بعض نصوص محمد بن عبدالوهاب رحمه الله، واستمر الأتباع إلى هذا العهد موصومون بهذه الشدة، وكنا نسمع نحن قديماً أن هؤلاء النجديين يكفرون عامة المسلمين، أو يقولون عنهم خوارج “The truth regarding Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhab is that he has done a great favour upon the Islamic nation, but he had some level of exaggeration and harshness. … This group has inherited some of this harshness, which they of course took from the writings of Mohammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab, may God be merciful to him. They are stigmatised with this harshness. And we used to hear from long time ago that these Najdis make Takfir on the general masses of the Muslims, and they used to be accused of being Khawarij.” 2- Albani said after he mentioned some good qualities of Ibn Taymiyah: , بخلاف الشيخ محمد بن عبد الوهاب, فلم تكن له هذه العناية, لا في الحديث ولا في الفقه السلفي, فهو من الناحية المذهبية حنبلي, ومن الناحية الحديثية كغيره, فليس له آثار في الفقه تدلنا على أنه كابن تيمية سلفي المنهج في التفقه في الدين, لعل له في ذلك عذرا كما ألمحنا إليه آنفا.وكذلك في الأحاديث فهو كغيره مع الأسف الشديد, لا معرفة عنده بالحديث الصحيح والضعيف “Contrary to Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab - who did not have this level of care in hadith nor in Salafi fiqh. He is a Hanbali from the side of the madhhab and in Hadith, he is like others. He has left no traces in Fiqh which would indicate to us that he was like Ibn Taymiyah a Salafi in manhaj in terms of his understanding of religion. Perhaps he has an excuse in this which we have already hinted at. And also in the hadith, he, like the others, unfortunately, has no knowledge of authentic or weak hadiths.” 3- Albani also said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 713): أما الوهابية: فما لي ولها ؛ فأنا أنقضها ؛ ربما أشد من غيري ، وربما الحاضرون يعلمون ذلك “As for al-Wahabiyah - what have I got to do with it?! I criticise it - sometimes even more than others! Those who are present know this.”
With regards to my refutation of particular individuals/groups that I have been refuting addressing over the past two years. It is quint-essential for us to understand that the methodology of Takfir that is embedded part of their practice; however, the question which arises, is this takfiri tendency something which is new to this hizib, or is this a tradition which has been practiced by the founders on the Najdiya?
This video covers some of the historical context pertaining to the life of Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab and the Takfir that he made and the resulting consequence of his Takfir. We also gain a better perspective of this methodology and the lengths and efforts this methodology goes in to exacting its takfir!
#BroHajji
#Salafis
#Najdis
In the meantime, I will cook some popcorn 🍿 and enjoy the journey that you are on! 😇
Is this takfeeri tendecies part 3?
What is your opinion on the taliban?
What’s the end game here especially considering what’s going on with the increased hostile activities against Islam i understand your motivation but I am talking here about the wisdom of timing prioritization of what is more important to confront in war in medicine in life in general there is a obligation to assess and understand the nature of threats the basic wisdom then of survival is to address the threats in relation to there significance as potential level
Of threat my brother in Islam it’s home ho cut this s-t and seek go organize your become that cemented line the Quran talks about pool your resources and intellect and talents Allah. Has given all of you friends sympathizers and antagonist go meet and defeat the major threat whip hell out of them then once three threat is silenced and. Subdued intellectually then if the urge still moves the collective of you then discuss your issues as Muslims IMAN atmosphere that’s free and secure of threats is that go damned much to ask is it go much to ask to present a united front that endeavor will produce the favor of Allah that is almost beyond words to articulate in this life and the next live the Muslim greeting UNITE AND DEFEAT as ONE
I mean the Quran talks about how the enemies will united against you then directs us to unite therefore as one against them . Notice how Christian anti Islamic apologist are uniting and I mean people that normally that not SPIT on a spark plug to help there cars 🚗 now for the first time u see them on each other’s shows sharing thoughts and pooling there resources in a united effort against Islam DAM I T WAKE THE HELL. UP who will be the first among you to call for a united front to pool your talents and the guidance given you by Allah who will be the first of you to call for the greater value of the collective good of Islam and the believers who ?
This is important for every Muslim to know. Especially new converts you are are easily influenced by these extremists.
True 💯
It is important to know that only a jahil or a sufi rejects the dawah of sheikh al islam abd al wahhab
@@PoesieIslamique from your comment it's so clear you've been indoctrinated. I guarantee you don't even know what a sufi is
@@PoesieIslamiquewhat a clown . Did u watch the video ? Did u see the evidences from your own books that he did blanket and chain takfeer on anyone who didn’t support him ? Do u reject that ?
They killed muhammad bin a3mmar in the masjid. That’s your sheikh Al Islam ? More like bandit leader Wahab
Let's be clear: When MIAW followers, to this day, talk of MIAW 'purging Arabia of shirk' what they mean is that somehow in the space of 1000 years after the Rashidun caliphate the Arabian peninsular has so radically regressed to paganism that when MIAW and his followers arrive on the scene the tribes of Arabia had become not that different from Hindus (i.e. actual idol worshippers). If you genuinely think that then you're illiterate about history, if you don't believe those murdered tribespeople weren't pseudo-Hindus then you're shameless as well as intellectually dishonest for being a partisan hack or if you believe those tribes were 'misguided' (i.e. non-Athari) then how could you morally justify a level of slaughter that verges on genocide?
The MIAW crowd are dangerous because their apologia material (i.e. literature and audio white-wash of MIAW) is not only a 'gateway' intellectual drug to Daeesh ideology but Daeesh themselves often rope in recruits by showing to recent converts from Wahaabism how it's Daeesh, not Madhkalism, is the true heir to MIAW and his teachings. If you want to undermine Daeesh your undermine the sugar-coating of MIAW not praise him. Defend and praise MIAW and you'll stupidly create an recruitment icon into Daeesh the same way Communists use the icon of Che Guevera to recruit people into communism.
BTW Let me repeat again: No one is saying don't be Athari, Ibn Taymiyyah is a great theologian, and no one is saying don't be a Athari who subscribes to Hanbali fiqh as even the Ashaari and Maturidi acknowledge Ahmed Ibn Hanbal as an imam of fiqh. What you're guys are being warned off on is to not be a MIAW fanboy as it can potentially lead you to a very dark place (i.e. Daeesh recruitment or susceptible to Daeesh takfiri propoganda).
Very well said mate thanks for that
Very well said... Also if further proof is needed brother.... Just look at what these teachings create. Isis ,daessh, al juhaymaein, the madkhalis, al qaeda and the list goes on. Just chaos after chaos. Pure KHAWARIJ mentality all across the board. May Allah SWT protect us
@@043ash ameen
True story: about 5 years ago in Madina at Jannat al baqi I overheard some Pakistani brethren speaking in urdu about the state of the ummah. They were saying the issue is salfies everywhere. Even at the graveyard we are condemned to witnessing salfi behaviour. I thought to myself that sectarianism has hit everywhere even those visiting such holiest of places. I only realised later they were talking about selfies 😂 #حسن الظن
Lol
😄
I thought I was educated by BH's former videos but this was an eye opener. Love the maps aswell, helps a lot. Jzk.
This guy will lead down a deep dark hole
@Said Bale lol learn how to spell first 🤣
That's good because some super salafees in my country are blind in geography they even denied that Diriyah located in Najd, they denied it by saying Najd is in Iraq
@@yousifaltigani9838 bro bro hajji is critizing the saudis, it's likely the first saudi state expansiinsm idiology that abused the dawah of. Tawhed not the dawah itself, even MIAW wrong we still have Ibn Taimiyaj
@Said Bale Well done, you spelled your response correctly this time 👏
Ibn Ghannam is either a sick man to write this with no shame or he is a true hero to give a testimony so we can see how barbaric those guys were
I've sat with ulema of al Ahsaa , the Aal Mubarak clan in particular, a clan renowned for ilm and ulema , throughout the Jazeera , strong and firm upon the sunna, and I can tell you, they have not forgot the massacres and bloodshed perpetrated upon them by the najdi proxies of the Anglo saxon colonialists..
He was miaw historian he simply wrote what miaw did as a eye witness
If you could edit this video by adding the Volume and Page Numbers as some brothers are asking me where are the references AND give a brief intro on the main 3 books and their authors used here, Durrar Saniyyah, An'wanul Najd, Ta'reekhul Najd, because some them are so thick sadly, JZKL Then I will spread the link to this video on the latest videos of the various Salafis of the West.
Asalamu alakum bro Hajji May Allah swt reward u @brohajji
I showed all the screen shots to these hard headed salafis and they were so in denial they are asking for the page numbers
Is it possible for you to reference the volume and page?
If it’s no trouble Jazak Allah kheirn
@Bro Hajji we need volume n page numbers !!
What kinda logic is that to say that they were righteous and that is why they were victorious?
Then how about Ottomans ruling so many lands, conquering Istanbul especially when there is a specific hadith to that and being victorious in so many wars etc.? So they weren't righteous and they were mushriks and khafirs? What kinda logic is that?
And how can you guarantee that Saudi will never collapse?
The hadith is not linked to sultan mehmet.
@@muhammadabdulmateen8473 you can believe it doesn’t but so many scholars say it is! Because for some, if they accept that this Hadith is linked to sultan Mehmed, their whole ideology/aqeedah will collapse! That is why they are claiming it is not linked.
@@ac-go4np Narrated Mu'adh ibn Jabal:
The Prophet (ﷺ) said: The flourishing state of Jerusalem will be when Yathrib is in ruins, the ruined state of Yathrib will be when the great war comes, the outbreak of the great war will be at the conquest of Constantinople and the conquest of Constantinople when the Dajjal (Antichrist) comes forth. He (the Prophet) struck his thigh or his shoulder with his hand and said: This is as true as you are here or as you are sitting (meaning Mu'adh ibn Jabal).
حَدَّثَنَا عَبَّاسٌ الْعَنْبَرِيُّ، حَدَّثَنَا هَاشِمُ بْنُ الْقَاسِمِ، حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ ثَابِتِ بْنِ ثَوْبَانَ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ مَكْحُولٍ، عَنْ جُبَيْرِ بْنِ نُفَيْرٍ، عَنْ مَالِكِ بْنِ يُخَامِرَ، عَنْ مُعَاذِ بْنِ جَبَلٍ، قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم " عُمْرَانُ بَيْتِ الْمَقْدِسِ خَرَابُ يَثْرِبَ وَخَرَابُ يَثْرِبَ خُرُوجُ الْمَلْحَمَةِ وَخُرُوجُ الْمَلْحَمَةِ فَتْحُ قُسْطَنْطِينِيَّةَ وَفَتْحُ الْقُسْطَنْطِينِيَّةِ خُرُوجُ الدَّجَّالِ " . ثُمَّ ضَرَبَ بِيَدِهِ عَلَى فَخِذِ الَّذِي حَدَّثَ - أَوْ مَنْكِبِهِ - ثُمَّ قَالَ إِنَّ هَذَا لَحَقٌّ كَمَا أَنَّكَ هَا هُنَا أَوْ كَمَا أَنَّكَ قَاعِدٌ . يَعْنِي مُعَاذَ بْنَ جَبَلٍ .
Grade: Hasan (Al-Albani) حسن (الألباني)حكم
So which great war is it? And whrs dajjal? Is yathrib in ruins? And jerusalem flourishing?
Using one hadith to affirm a event is wrong. Thr are many hadith which contradicts it and this is one of them.
@@muhammadabdulmateen8473 What about the hadith: "The city of Constantinople shall be conquered. What a great leader its leader will be, and what a good army is that army."
Why did the companions of the prophet, dispatch numerous armies to attempt conquer Constantinople? Including Abu Ayubal Ansari r.a. who hosted, the Prophet s.a.w. when he came to Madina, tried to conquer Constantinople.
Was there a great war? Dajjal? Is yathrib in ruins? And Jerusalem flourishing?
So companions of the Prophet s.a.w. didn't understand The Prophet s.a.w.?
Just reading the hadith and making your own interpretation is wrong imo. We should stick with generations of scholars and not ignore what they have been saying
Also even it wasn't meant for Sultan Mehmed, that doesn't negate the fact that Ottoman Empire was victorious, and by their own logic Ottoman Empire was righteous!
@@ac-go4np which numerous army went to conquer ? How many times did they conquer? And if u rely on this understanding that it was 1453 thn why would the prophet peace and blessings be upon him praised a leader which practiced fratricide? Is it allowed in islam? Did any righteous caliphs did that?
And even if its meant for 1453 thn how would a 2nd conquest take at the same place? Other hadiths says it will be at the end times which the conquest will take place , means now istanbul is in turkey lands which is muslim majority , and it means a muslim army will conquer a muslim land to take constantinopole? Does it make sense?
If any of you were told he truth would you accept?
What is the truth according to you.
@@SonGoku-io7sh The Quran and Sunnah, this guy never talks about those. Always this book and that book (and he doesn't understand those either)
@@muneerahmed9878 Probably because he isn't a Salafi like you? He is Athari and Hanafi. What's the problem, unless you plan to do takfeer of him as well?
Besides he has shown up plenty of Salafi's by now, yet you still try to nit pick his supposed flaws. You are at best a blind follower, which is an amusing irony.
@@muneerahmed9878 he is talking about MiAw , hr is doing tahdzer on him , you can still follow Ibn Taimiyah and Ibn Qayyim , athari doesn't same with Miaw
@@muneerahmed9878 Super-Salafis hide behind the phrase: “Qur’an and Sunnah”
But they really don’t care to stay true to its meaning when it comes to justifying their rhetoric and flawed methodology.
Jzk Allah khairan for bringing this out.
May Allah grant you sincerity, acceptance, and ability to carry on with the good work.
Mutley's back. LOL
Al-Tirmidhi narrated that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said to Mu’adh (may Allah be pleased with him), after teaching him some of the laws of Islam, “Shall I not tell you what is the foundation of all that?” I [Mu’adh] said: “Of course, O Prophet of Allah.” He took hold of his tongue and said, “Control this.” I said, “O Prophet of Allah, will we be held responsible for what we say with it?” He said, “May your mother be bereft of you, O Mu’adh! Will the people be thrown into Hell on their faces or on their noses for anything other than the harvest of their tongues?” Classed as saheeh by al-Albani.
What's your point? How is reading the history of the murder and bloodshed perpetrated by kaafir najdis who were and still are servants of the Anglo saxons , related to the Hadith you inappropriately quoted ?
@@ZubairAhmed-od2xvyou clearly gave an example of what the prophet salalahu alayi wasalam, control your tongue, you just called Muslims open Kaafirs.
The video ended abruptly. Please reupload the last part, insha Allah. Barakallahu feekum.
It’s resolved now بارك الله فيك
As-salamu 3aleikum. I used to consider MIAW as a scholar but i gradually understood that he put his principles too far and neglected ayat of Quran about kufr that did not match with his mass takfir. Last summer, in my garden, I burned all his books that i used to have. Al hamdulillah for opening my eyes about this takfiri kharidji. Here, in France, salafis from all tendancies consider him as a great scholar.
Yeah you got brainwashed just say it.
Abd al wahhab is sheikh al islam and he didnt come with something new.
Repent to Allah
Oui en France on le considère car on est sur la vérité on a pas été lavé comme toi al hamdulilah.
Seul un ignorant ou un sectaire peut bruler les livres de sheikh al islam
@@PoesieIslamiqueAh yes Shayk al Islam with zero credentials whose father and brother spoke ill of him.
@@muwahh1d1Scholars back then didn’t have Credentials Handicap 😂 They were aaffirmed by each other which He was and His Family repented
Wa alaykum as-Salam. He used Qur'an and SSunnah as proof...
Love ur punjabi accent bro😂❤️
Zabardast Bhai
Da'gwa Tow-head is a more correct description of them.
Who was also killed in a masjiyd... oh yeah 'Aliy ibn Abiy 'Taalib KmW, the first Muslim leader to combat the 1st iteration of the Khawaarij. As if an indication pattern for those with healthy minds to see.
Anyways... Khawaarij by nature call people to go into the Qur^aan (and Sunna) directly by themselves and bypassing the 'ulamaa. But what interesting is the last iteration of Khawaarij, the Khawaarij of Akhiruzzamaan, will abandon Al-Ma'hdiy RHM and follow Dajjaal.
An 180° contrast. In other words, the last iteration of Khawaarij are fond of deceptions, deceits and manipulation of truth.
Will wonder never cease.
what kind of video is this? i'm pretty sure i heard people laughing and snorring, but great job.
Question is, how do you rid the poison of MBAW from the Islamic world
You need to worry about hijab atm
@@ismailmiah1446 don't worry, MBS is removing hijab and introducing bikinis in Arabia.
@thethirdpillar Allah save us from the fitnah of Muhammad bin Salman and the Dajjal ameen
thethirdpillar that's clearly not what Abdul Wahab did, his men simply slaughtered the rulers of the tribes
@thethirdpillarThis video lays is it out! List to @43.00 on. It's very clear
@36:56 needs correction. Ibn saud sets the condition that he continues to take taxes from people as he used to do before (this type of taxing / form of jyzya taken from muslims is not permissible). Muhammad ibn Abdulwahab responds that he hopes that Allah will gives him more than that from the ghaneema he will get so that he won't need to take taxes anymore.
All of Hanabila was on one side and MIAW and his cronies with guns and swords on the other 🙄 ⚔️
Sulaiman abdul waahab( brother of abdul waahab) wrote a critical book on Muhammad abdul waahab. Iv been looking for this book in English. If someone has a extra one to donate or know its name or where I can get it, I like to read it.
He takes it back in the end and he make tawba from the book. Search about it.
You can find a summary here: ua-cam.com/video/C7JJHMNiSr4/v-deo.html
@@omarov_1974 Bakr Abu Zayd and `Abd al-Rahman `Uthaymin, the two Wahhabi editors of Ibn Humayd al-Najdi's Hanbali bio-dictionary _al-Suhub al-Wabila `ala Dara'ih al-Hanabila_ (Risala ed. 2:679), consider the report of that repentence spurious and say there is no proof that Sulayman ever changed his mind.
@@omarov_1974 no he didn't that was a fabrication from miaw hard-core supporters it is said he was put under home arrest until moaw and Saud died then he left the place and Continued to promote and speak against miaw and Saud alliance
The claim he repented came a 100 years after his death from not even a eye witness but a miaw follower to defend his sheikh from getting exposed
@@omarov_1974 what do you mean by tawbah?
What's the name of nasheed
Did you find
astagfirullah. He was a great imam, you shouldn't say such things and confuse the community. Couple months back I had zero knowledge and videos like these would only drive me away from the deen, every1 refuting eachother etc. Please realise this is harmful. Alhamdulillah ever since I've only focused on taking knowledge from scholars (although I struggled to get here) my imaan has become stronger. Dear reader, I request you to leave all these youtubers and focus on your own deen. Read books, study etc and never forget knowledge is not taken from UA-cam clips. You can ask me for any suggestions if you need help
Nah you gotta realise that hes speaking the truth that alot of these salafies are hiding. you have to use your brain sometimes bro
These salfies take advantage of people naieviety to misguide into believing miaw was this mujahid. The truth is he was a khawrij who has the blood of muslim on his hands
@@ousmanejalloh7312 evidence?
@@lostsouls5885 the video 😂😂
Sheikh albani on sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul wahab الألباني: محمد بن عبدالوهاب فيه غلو وشده
Albani considered Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab a reformer and praised his Da’wah, but he also criticized him for their excessive Takfir.
Albani says about Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab:
- He had exaggeration and harshness
- His followers inherited that from his teachings
- He could not differentiate between authentic [صحيح] and weak [ضعيف] Ahadith
- He had no high level of care in following Salafi Fiqh
- I am one of the harshest critics of the Wahabiyah
1- Albani said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 297):
الحقيقة محمد بن عبدالوهاب فضله كبير على الأمة الإسلامية ؛ لكن فيه شيء من الغلو والشدة
الجماعة كان عندهم شيء من الشدة؛ أخذوها طبعاً من بعض نصوص محمد بن عبدالوهاب رحمه الله، واستمر الأتباع إلى هذا العهد موصومون بهذه الشدة، وكنا نسمع نحن قديماً أن هؤلاء النجديين يكفرون عامة المسلمين، أو يقولون عنهم خوارج
“The truth regarding Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhab is that he has done a great favour upon the Islamic nation, but he had some level of exaggeration and harshness.
… This group has inherited some of this harshness, which they of course took from the writings of Mohammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab, may God be merciful to him. They are stigmatised with this harshness.
And we used to hear from long time ago that these Najdis make Takfir on the general masses of the Muslims, and they used to be accused of being Khawarij.”
2- Albani said after he mentioned some good qualities of Ibn Taymiyah:
, بخلاف الشيخ محمد بن عبد الوهاب, فلم تكن له هذه العناية, لا في الحديث ولا في الفقه السلفي, فهو من الناحية المذهبية حنبلي, ومن الناحية الحديثية كغيره, فليس له آثار في الفقه تدلنا على أنه كابن تيمية سلفي المنهج في التفقه في الدين, لعل له في ذلك عذرا كما ألمحنا إليه آنفا.وكذلك في الأحاديث فهو كغيره مع الأسف الشديد, لا معرفة عنده بالحديث الصحيح والضعيف
“Contrary to Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab - who did not have this level of care in hadith nor in Salafi fiqh. He is a Hanbali from the side of the madhhab and in Hadith, he is like others.
He has left no traces in Fiqh which would indicate to us that he was like Ibn Taymiyah a Salafi in manhaj in terms of his understanding of religion. Perhaps he has an excuse in this which we have already hinted at.
And also in the hadith, he, like the others, unfortunately, has no knowledge of authentic or weak hadiths.”
3- Albani also said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 713):
أما الوهابية: فما لي ولها ؛ فأنا أنقضها ؛ ربما أشد من غيري ، وربما الحاضرون يعلمون ذلك
“As for al-Wahabiyah - what have I got to do with it?!
I criticise it - sometimes even more than others!
Those who are present know this.”
Where can i get this book? Tarikun najd, the one used in the video
Thanks for this really appreciate it
Mutley is back😂😂
4:10 initial claim thoght of neo salafis
8:00 1160 - 1232 MIAW slaughtered inside and outside of najd
9:33 stain on the ummah
15:00 non compliance with MIAW thoughts and non entry under the dawla of miaw made you a mushrik
15:39 yemeni hujaj - spoke to najdis and the najdis claimed yemenis to be kuffar -EXTREMISM
sHAWKANI SPOKE FIRST Hand to witnesses
17:52 Najdis themselves state tat if you weren't part 0f their dawla you are an apostate
18:24 ADdurr us sanniya
If they dont enter the obedience of MIS this is ridda
Those that support turks are also apostates
obligatory to do jihad against those tribes that support turks
23:25 Muslims called mushrikeen because they support turks - also these people are to be fought against and killed
25:07 Saudi clerics views on historicity of miaw dawla methodology and beliefs
miaw and his offpsring believed that they were the only muslims in Arab peninsula/ planet
26:39 1157 to 1232 blanket takfeer, chain takfeer, massacre, killng, looting,
27:25 Unwan al majd fi tarikh al najd
year 1157 ah
Initially AW was in tribe of huraymilah
then he moved to dirriyah
MBS convinced by his wife to align with ibn abdul wahab
initial conversation
Glad tidings on victory and who ever clings and aids tawheed allah will give them control to land
Ibn abdul wahab claims all najd is on shirk
He hopes saud becomes imam and his offspring.
1st meeting - !!! you scratch my back i scratch yours
35:52 Ibn saud wants his bayah and is given
Discussin war booty and ghaneema
38:42
IAW writes letters of leaders of provinces. Some accepted, some didnt, some belittled him/
in response to this iaw ordered jihad against these muslims 41:20
Salam Brother, I am shia and I know we have a lot of disagreements but, I really like hearing you talk. The first Video of you I saw was so annoying because you were eating and I hate those noises but the rest of it were very good! specifically those against the sufi lokman guy. may Allah bless you.
May ﷻ Allah guide you!!!
and you not. @@alima.6776
I guess I will stick to quran and sunnah... idk who is right and wrong
Like they say every coin has two side
stick to the righteous imams
@@sbasha7 You muhamedans really HATE to read, don't you?
@@worfoz you christians really hate to think? Cause if you did, then you would never believe in the joke that is called a trinity.
@@sbasha7 why do you bnelieve that I am a christian, child rapist worshipper?
did your hatred told you so?
@Mosaab نعم هو do you understand Islam better than those imams?
You could make a movie about this
Bro please also add page no and vol. It will be more informative then and academic too....
Who watches this 2 and half hour video ???
People who are interested in the truth.
@@Kimeikus what is the guarantee
Nasheed name
Open History of Najd by ibn Ghannam and read the atrocities most commited against poor Muslims and none against Christians, Jews or Pagans.
If you watch the video that’s what I do 😂
@@BroHajjiAkhi Can this book be obtained in English? Has anyone ever bothered to translate it?
Can u do a explanation for the hadith about najd please ?
Finally!!!!!!
Bro no way they labeled muslims who were making hajj and ummah kuffaar...that's khawarij for sure!!!
Woah!
tf title and introducing with shamsi 😂😂
Mr hajji proves that you just hate the saudiya and salaf
Don't you, after knowing their treacherous and bloody history.?
1:19:45 brother hajji this statement you made is clear Irjaa and not the aqeedah of the sahaba
You can not be a muwwahhid that commits shirk
Nor can you be a mushrik that is also a muwwahhid
Sad to hear this from you
Original gangsta bro haji da don
You completely became misguided officially may Allah fix our hearts on his religion
how?
@@FreddieGamingHD because he is defending the infidel grave worshipers now and spread the accusations against the imams of najd just because his problems with the madkhalies
@@ahmedfarahat8489 or your just afriad of accepting the truth about those imams you worship
@@ahmedfarahat8489 no he isn't grave worshipping is one thing and bandit looting fake takfir is another matter majority muslim were jot committing those shirk there were those who were but to declare a whole country kafir and on the same page as then is nothing more then a 9ver exegerated claim
@@ahmedfarahat8489 Sheikh albani on sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul wahab الألباني: محمد بن عبدالوهاب فيه غلو وشده
Albani considered Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab a reformer and praised his Da’wah, but he also criticized him for their excessive Takfir.
Albani says about Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab:
- He had exaggeration and harshness
- His followers inherited that from his teachings
- He could not differentiate between authentic [صحيح] and weak [ضعيف] Ahadith
- He had no high level of care in following Salafi Fiqh
- I am one of the harshest critics of the Wahabiyah
1- Albani said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 297):
الحقيقة محمد بن عبدالوهاب فضله كبير على الأمة الإسلامية ؛ لكن فيه شيء من الغلو والشدة
الجماعة كان عندهم شيء من الشدة؛ أخذوها طبعاً من بعض نصوص محمد بن عبدالوهاب رحمه الله، واستمر الأتباع إلى هذا العهد موصومون بهذه الشدة، وكنا نسمع نحن قديماً أن هؤلاء النجديين يكفرون عامة المسلمين، أو يقولون عنهم خوارج
“The truth regarding Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhab is that he has done a great favour upon the Islamic nation, but he had some level of exaggeration and harshness.
… This group has inherited some of this harshness, which they of course took from the writings of Mohammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab, may God be merciful to him. They are stigmatised with this harshness.
And we used to hear from long time ago that these Najdis make Takfir on the general masses of the Muslims, and they used to be accused of being Khawarij.”
2- Albani said after he mentioned some good qualities of Ibn Taymiyah:
, بخلاف الشيخ محمد بن عبد الوهاب, فلم تكن له هذه العناية, لا في الحديث ولا في الفقه السلفي, فهو من الناحية المذهبية حنبلي, ومن الناحية الحديثية كغيره, فليس له آثار في الفقه تدلنا على أنه كابن تيمية سلفي المنهج في التفقه في الدين, لعل له في ذلك عذرا كما ألمحنا إليه آنفا.وكذلك في الأحاديث فهو كغيره مع الأسف الشديد, لا معرفة عنده بالحديث الصحيح والضعيف
“Contrary to Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab - who did not have this level of care in hadith nor in Salafi fiqh. He is a Hanbali from the side of the madhhab and in Hadith, he is like others.
He has left no traces in Fiqh which would indicate to us that he was like Ibn Taymiyah a Salafi in manhaj in terms of his understanding of religion. Perhaps he has an excuse in this which we have already hinted at.
And also in the hadith, he, like the others, unfortunately, has no knowledge of authentic or weak hadiths.”
3- Albani also said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 713):
أما الوهابية: فما لي ولها ؛ فأنا أنقضها ؛ ربما أشد من غيري ، وربما الحاضرون يعلمون ذلك
“As for al-Wahabiyah - what have I got to do with it?!
I criticise it - sometimes even more than others!
Those who are present know this.”
I love how lay people have been forced into choosing an Aqeeda for themselves, when this should only apply for the knowledgeable amongst us and those interested in learning.
Can thank certain Athari's for this too, though I personally subscribe to none as I believe being able to practice your religion has no Ikhtilaaf amongst any of the Aqa'id.
muhamed raaped a child, only idiots think he also was a prophet
islam is not a religion, christianity is and you pagans hate religions
surah 2;256
This vid has nothing to do with aqida
Any other aqida apart from athari or the late aqida of Abu Hassan al Ash'ari is wrong
@@FactsWithActs maybe you didn't understand the video. It's all about Aqeeda and how peoples supposed incorrect Aqeeda was used against them.
.
Just read ONE book of Muhamad ibnul Wahhaab you tell us if this boy is mentally stable. Same way the raafidee shia is using past mistakes of some salaf to fight ahlul sunnah wal jamaa’ah. So this boy is saying shaik uthaymeen,shaikh bin Baz…all are misguided????
Misguided indeed ..all of them...what you fail to realise is that the ibn saud - salafi religion, is an ethno centric, nationalist religion which , is why, the "zeal" for tauhid to be spread, ends at the borders of the modern day zionist/saudi/wahhabite state?
I'll tell you, its because they weren't fighting for tauhid, but dunya..
No he is saying aqeedah wise miaw was right but his political works are a mess
Sheikh albani on sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul wahab الألباني: محمد بن عبدالوهاب فيه غلو وشده
Albani considered Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab a reformer and praised his Da’wah, but he also criticized him for their excessive Takfir.
Albani says about Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab:
- He had exaggeration and harshness
- His followers inherited that from his teachings
- He could not differentiate between authentic [صحيح] and weak [ضعيف] Ahadith
- He had no high level of care in following Salafi Fiqh
- I am one of the harshest critics of the Wahabiyah
1- Albani said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 297):
الحقيقة محمد بن عبدالوهاب فضله كبير على الأمة الإسلامية ؛ لكن فيه شيء من الغلو والشدة
الجماعة كان عندهم شيء من الشدة؛ أخذوها طبعاً من بعض نصوص محمد بن عبدالوهاب رحمه الله، واستمر الأتباع إلى هذا العهد موصومون بهذه الشدة، وكنا نسمع نحن قديماً أن هؤلاء النجديين يكفرون عامة المسلمين، أو يقولون عنهم خوارج
“The truth regarding Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhab is that he has done a great favour upon the Islamic nation, but he had some level of exaggeration and harshness.
… This group has inherited some of this harshness, which they of course took from the writings of Mohammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab, may God be merciful to him. They are stigmatised with this harshness.
And we used to hear from long time ago that these Najdis make Takfir on the general masses of the Muslims, and they used to be accused of being Khawarij.”
2- Albani said after he mentioned some good qualities of Ibn Taymiyah:
, بخلاف الشيخ محمد بن عبد الوهاب, فلم تكن له هذه العناية, لا في الحديث ولا في الفقه السلفي, فهو من الناحية المذهبية حنبلي, ومن الناحية الحديثية كغيره, فليس له آثار في الفقه تدلنا على أنه كابن تيمية سلفي المنهج في التفقه في الدين, لعل له في ذلك عذرا كما ألمحنا إليه آنفا.وكذلك في الأحاديث فهو كغيره مع الأسف الشديد, لا معرفة عنده بالحديث الصحيح والضعيف
“Contrary to Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab - who did not have this level of care in hadith nor in Salafi fiqh. He is a Hanbali from the side of the madhhab and in Hadith, he is like others.
He has left no traces in Fiqh which would indicate to us that he was like Ibn Taymiyah a Salafi in manhaj in terms of his understanding of religion. Perhaps he has an excuse in this which we have already hinted at.
And also in the hadith, he, like the others, unfortunately, has no knowledge of authentic or weak hadiths.”
3- Albani also said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 713):
أما الوهابية: فما لي ولها ؛ فأنا أنقضها ؛ ربما أشد من غيري ، وربما الحاضرون يعلمون ذلك
“As for al-Wahabiyah - what have I got to do with it?!
I criticise it - sometimes even more than others!
Those who are present know this.”
38:26 😊
1:14:29 😂 Someone is dreaming of mamas aloo pratas..💤
2:28:03 "mentally deranged freak", that's not a nice way to speak of a muslim brother....Why is he mentally deranged, that is very harsh, even if you don't agree with him.
I agree but they aren’t better they call him the donkey of Birmingham.
True.. That's what I mean, we have as an ummah stooped to a low level. There are other ways of making a point, than using this kind of language. Practice of eloquence and making a point would strengthen the ummah and generate a whole lot of respect from everywhere. Eloquence was a mark of distinction among so many sahabah and prophet Muhammad himself, sAaws, and many muslims after them, let's remember that and follow their example. Foul language and behavior will only give the islamophobes reason to ridicule us.
you shouldve never put those flowers there...
@@sisterfleur7523 uuuummmmmm... ight ;)
Is this intended to succeed the two videos you did called “Refuting Dawah Man- Chain Takfeer”? Jazakallah khair for your work bro.
Yes بارك الله فيك
Instead of barking, write your books in response to the books of Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abdul wahab!
Is this another MHijab philosophy student what manhaj do these lads follow are they sufis?
Athari, but deal with facts as he said.
Stand with us or agaisnt us🤔 simmilar ... George bush when he declare war on teror
Fear Allah stop this slander of a scholar!
The najdis don't have scholars, but rather propagandists...
How is the truth slander? What about the blood of the innocent Muslims that was split
Sheikh albani on sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul wahab الألباني: محمد بن عبدالوهاب فيه غلو وشده
Albani considered Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab a reformer and praised his Da’wah, but he also criticized him for their excessive Takfir.
Albani says about Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab:
- He had exaggeration and harshness
- His followers inherited that from his teachings
- He could not differentiate between authentic [صحيح] and weak [ضعيف] Ahadith
- He had no high level of care in following Salafi Fiqh
- I am one of the harshest critics of the Wahabiyah
1- Albani said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 297):
الحقيقة محمد بن عبدالوهاب فضله كبير على الأمة الإسلامية ؛ لكن فيه شيء من الغلو والشدة
الجماعة كان عندهم شيء من الشدة؛ أخذوها طبعاً من بعض نصوص محمد بن عبدالوهاب رحمه الله، واستمر الأتباع إلى هذا العهد موصومون بهذه الشدة، وكنا نسمع نحن قديماً أن هؤلاء النجديين يكفرون عامة المسلمين، أو يقولون عنهم خوارج
“The truth regarding Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhab is that he has done a great favour upon the Islamic nation, but he had some level of exaggeration and harshness.
… This group has inherited some of this harshness, which they of course took from the writings of Mohammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab, may God be merciful to him. They are stigmatised with this harshness.
And we used to hear from long time ago that these Najdis make Takfir on the general masses of the Muslims, and they used to be accused of being Khawarij.”
2- Albani said after he mentioned some good qualities of Ibn Taymiyah:
, بخلاف الشيخ محمد بن عبد الوهاب, فلم تكن له هذه العناية, لا في الحديث ولا في الفقه السلفي, فهو من الناحية المذهبية حنبلي, ومن الناحية الحديثية كغيره, فليس له آثار في الفقه تدلنا على أنه كابن تيمية سلفي المنهج في التفقه في الدين, لعل له في ذلك عذرا كما ألمحنا إليه آنفا.وكذلك في الأحاديث فهو كغيره مع الأسف الشديد, لا معرفة عنده بالحديث الصحيح والضعيف
“Contrary to Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab - who did not have this level of care in hadith nor in Salafi fiqh. He is a Hanbali from the side of the madhhab and in Hadith, he is like others.
He has left no traces in Fiqh which would indicate to us that he was like Ibn Taymiyah a Salafi in manhaj in terms of his understanding of religion. Perhaps he has an excuse in this which we have already hinted at.
And also in the hadith, he, like the others, unfortunately, has no knowledge of authentic or weak hadiths.”
3- Albani also said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 713):
أما الوهابية: فما لي ولها ؛ فأنا أنقضها ؛ ربما أشد من غيري ، وربما الحاضرون يعلمون ذلك
“As for al-Wahabiyah - what have I got to do with it?!
I criticise it - sometimes even more than others!
Those who are present know this.”
this person needs to fear Allah, before he open his mouth!
How do u know he doesnt? Oooh i get it. You’re not supposed to utter a word against the saudi monarchy 😂😂 youre just slaves
Why truth hurts salafisss
Sheikh albani on sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul wahab الألباني: محمد بن عبدالوهاب فيه غلو وشده
Albani considered Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab a reformer and praised his Da’wah, but he also criticized him for their excessive Takfir.
Albani says about Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab:
- He had exaggeration and harshness
- His followers inherited that from his teachings
- He could not differentiate between authentic [صحيح] and weak [ضعيف] Ahadith
- He had no high level of care in following Salafi Fiqh
- I am one of the harshest critics of the Wahabiyah
1- Albani said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 297):
الحقيقة محمد بن عبدالوهاب فضله كبير على الأمة الإسلامية ؛ لكن فيه شيء من الغلو والشدة
الجماعة كان عندهم شيء من الشدة؛ أخذوها طبعاً من بعض نصوص محمد بن عبدالوهاب رحمه الله، واستمر الأتباع إلى هذا العهد موصومون بهذه الشدة، وكنا نسمع نحن قديماً أن هؤلاء النجديين يكفرون عامة المسلمين، أو يقولون عنهم خوارج
“The truth regarding Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhab is that he has done a great favour upon the Islamic nation, but he had some level of exaggeration and harshness.
… This group has inherited some of this harshness, which they of course took from the writings of Mohammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab, may God be merciful to him. They are stigmatised with this harshness.
And we used to hear from long time ago that these Najdis make Takfir on the general masses of the Muslims, and they used to be accused of being Khawarij.”
2- Albani said after he mentioned some good qualities of Ibn Taymiyah:
, بخلاف الشيخ محمد بن عبد الوهاب, فلم تكن له هذه العناية, لا في الحديث ولا في الفقه السلفي, فهو من الناحية المذهبية حنبلي, ومن الناحية الحديثية كغيره, فليس له آثار في الفقه تدلنا على أنه كابن تيمية سلفي المنهج في التفقه في الدين, لعل له في ذلك عذرا كما ألمحنا إليه آنفا.وكذلك في الأحاديث فهو كغيره مع الأسف الشديد, لا معرفة عنده بالحديث الصحيح والضعيف
“Contrary to Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab - who did not have this level of care in hadith nor in Salafi fiqh. He is a Hanbali from the side of the madhhab and in Hadith, he is like others.
He has left no traces in Fiqh which would indicate to us that he was like Ibn Taymiyah a Salafi in manhaj in terms of his understanding of religion. Perhaps he has an excuse in this which we have already hinted at.
And also in the hadith, he, like the others, unfortunately, has no knowledge of authentic or weak hadiths.”
3- Albani also said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 713):
أما الوهابية: فما لي ولها ؛ فأنا أنقضها ؛ ربما أشد من غيري ، وربما الحاضرون يعلمون ذلك
“As for al-Wahabiyah - what have I got to do with it?!
I criticise it - sometimes even more than others!
Those who are present know this.”
What is your opinion on the taliban in Afghanistan?
@@mohammadmubeen6701 they are afghans who fought the illegal occupation of foreign powers and they took back their home. As we see in the world, nobody does any attacks in their name because they dont call for it. Not like the other extreme grps which is mentioned in the video whr they call people who supported them to kill innocent non muslims and muslims alike . Time will tell if they are truthful to what the afghans have fought for and supported.
@Desert Man I wasn’t asking you mate.
@Desert Man are you alright?
finally.... its here
اعوذ بالله ... لا أرى في هذا الشخص الا جاهل عندما يتم تكفير او ان يتهم الاموات فبتعدوا عنه اشهد بالله اني اكرهك في الله واسال الله ان يكشف سرك امام الجميع
Fix up, he's giving historical facts , where the problem? Or do you also believe that the cradle of islam had become populated by musriks..research before you answer..oh, and your Arabic is atrocious , but keep it up.
@@ZubairAhmed-od2xv historical facts !! How do you know it's historical facts? Do you have the tools and methods to verify the historcsl claim? At least use your brain.
لا حرج في أنك لم تفهم اللغه العربية وأنت تستخدم قوقل لترجمه ولكن أن تقول لشخص ولد عربيا بان لغته شنيعه فهذا قمة الهراء. دعنا من هذا في الواقع عندما اطلعت على ردودك اكتشفت انك شخص غبي بالفطره لا تملك ادوات التحقق والمقارنه والاستدال وانما تنصاع للجهال امثالك . عندما يصل الشخص لمرحله التكفير و يتساهل في رمي التهم فقد وقع في الضلال اسال الله ان يحرس عقولنا وديننا من افكاركم الضاله والمنحرف. نصيحه لا تتساهل في تكفير مسلم فانت محاسب في يوم لا ينفع فيه الندم والحسره.
Sheikh albani on sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul wahab الألباني: محمد بن عبدالوهاب فيه غلو وشده
Albani considered Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab a reformer and praised his Da’wah, but he also criticized him for their excessive Takfir.
Albani says about Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab:
- He had exaggeration and harshness
- His followers inherited that from his teachings
- He could not differentiate between authentic [صحيح] and weak [ضعيف] Ahadith
- He had no high level of care in following Salafi Fiqh
- I am one of the harshest critics of the Wahabiyah
1- Albani said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 297):
الحقيقة محمد بن عبدالوهاب فضله كبير على الأمة الإسلامية ؛ لكن فيه شيء من الغلو والشدة
الجماعة كان عندهم شيء من الشدة؛ أخذوها طبعاً من بعض نصوص محمد بن عبدالوهاب رحمه الله، واستمر الأتباع إلى هذا العهد موصومون بهذه الشدة، وكنا نسمع نحن قديماً أن هؤلاء النجديين يكفرون عامة المسلمين، أو يقولون عنهم خوارج
“The truth regarding Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhab is that he has done a great favour upon the Islamic nation, but he had some level of exaggeration and harshness.
… This group has inherited some of this harshness, which they of course took from the writings of Mohammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab, may God be merciful to him. They are stigmatised with this harshness.
And we used to hear from long time ago that these Najdis make Takfir on the general masses of the Muslims, and they used to be accused of being Khawarij.”
2- Albani said after he mentioned some good qualities of Ibn Taymiyah:
, بخلاف الشيخ محمد بن عبد الوهاب, فلم تكن له هذه العناية, لا في الحديث ولا في الفقه السلفي, فهو من الناحية المذهبية حنبلي, ومن الناحية الحديثية كغيره, فليس له آثار في الفقه تدلنا على أنه كابن تيمية سلفي المنهج في التفقه في الدين, لعل له في ذلك عذرا كما ألمحنا إليه آنفا.وكذلك في الأحاديث فهو كغيره مع الأسف الشديد, لا معرفة عنده بالحديث الصحيح والضعيف
“Contrary to Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab - who did not have this level of care in hadith nor in Salafi fiqh. He is a Hanbali from the side of the madhhab and in Hadith, he is like others.
He has left no traces in Fiqh which would indicate to us that he was like Ibn Taymiyah a Salafi in manhaj in terms of his understanding of religion. Perhaps he has an excuse in this which we have already hinted at.
And also in the hadith, he, like the others, unfortunately, has no knowledge of authentic or weak hadiths.”
3- Albani also said (“Silsilah huda wa Noor”, 713):
أما الوهابية: فما لي ولها ؛ فأنا أنقضها ؛ ربما أشد من غيري ، وربما الحاضرون يعلمون ذلك
“As for al-Wahabiyah - what have I got to do with it?!
I criticise it - sometimes even more than others!
Those who are present know this.”
ايها الوهابيون المداهنون لابناء السعود المداهنون لاولياءهم الانجليز الصهاينة .جعلتم محمد عبد الوهاب رسول ايها تلجهلة الحقيقيون
What’s the poem called at the end of trailer
Where?
@@tsmk6599 there was a trailer before the video came out. I really liked the poem in it
@@Mrcontrolfreak21 you mean the nasheed with the pictures in the background?
@@tsmk6599 no it was before this video
@@tsmk6599 like this video had a trailer for it before it premiered this is where the poem was in
Takfeer of MIAW was valid shirk Akbar was everywhere as was magic and all sorts of evil