F-22 vs Russian Su-75 Fighter Pilot Reacts
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 гру 2023
- Fighter pilot reacts to Russian SU-75 Checkmate vs USA F-22 Raptor.
Support this channel by becoming a patron: / maxafterburner
📱 For more Follow Me On Instagram: / maxafterburner_official
📱 Follow Me on Tiktok: / maxafterburner_official
✈️ Here is my website if you'd like to learn more: maxafterburner.co
Check out my personal UA-cam channel as well: / channel
👍 Please Don't Forget To Like and Subscribe! - Ігри
SU-75 is a total pipe dream. I'd be shocked if they make a single test model in the next two decades.
Dude... The one you see here is a non-flying prototype! It is not a mockup! A non-flying prototype has almost all the systems and structures needed to test radar signature, and avionics tests that can be done on the ground! That means by now you are already wrong! That one went over your head like a bumblebee over a bike rider´s helmet! 🤣
@@Biden_is_dementedsince Russia’s GDP is about 1/14th of the USA’s, they’ll never build enough to matter.
You were half right. Non-flying yes, it was a fiberglass model. No internals, no cockpit, no nothing. Just like everything else Russia makes, they will claim all kinds of shit, it will never see, or live up to, just like the Su-57. Everyone has bailed on Russia, UAE,India, China, because Russia never has the technology they claim they do and what little they have uses all American of the shelf commercially evailable electronics in them like everything the have. They're still 30 years behind our 25 year old Raptor technology, ofcourse thatnprobly went over your head like a Raptor over the Russian military who couldn't hit it if it stood still for them! Hahahahahahahahahanahaha!
Again, they still don't even have a flying prototype.
Like all stealth fighter development programs, the flying prototype will surprise ya.
LOve the videos man! i watched your video on how to become a fighter pilot were you also said there was a video of fighterpilots gym routine, i havent found it tho, or havent you uploaded it? keep up the great work!
Yes it will, all 10 to 20 aircraft they actually build will… just not in any numbers that matter in any way other than an air show.
I agree. They only have a handful Su57 so I'm guessing even less of the higher more expensive aircraft.
@@anthonyj5298the Su-57 is the higher more expensive aircraft.
Being around WPAFB, plus knowing the crap ATF decision, the F23 team had developed helmet based targeting system that worked. Don’t get me started on the rest of the F23 long term platform advantages+LT upgradability. +ability to carry larger diameter/length missiles. +GE motors. Your point is well taken how F22 inherited update limits have prevented progress.
Max im prior army I appreciate your knowledge of aircraft and fighter aircraft and enjoy your post
Thanks for being here 👍👍
Hi. I know my question is off topic but i really need to know. If anyone knows why the nose of the fighter planes are painted in a different color from the fuselage,i will be grateful for the information. I build models and i heve seen this detail. Thanks a lot.
Oh my , if they can get the materials needed they may have a few in working condition by 2030
I have read that the F22 cockpit is too narrow to accommodate a full HMDS setup, that the helmet that the pilot would wear is just so much larger than the standard helmet that it limits the head movements of the pilot inside, simply because the F22 doesn't have a bubble canopy type like the F16, the inward sliding cockpit angles makes it very narrow. So that is why they are keeping the HUD.
They're not worried really in the Raptor, nothing will be a threat to it until long after the NGAD is in service and its retired. Whatever is new then will be just as behind the NGAD as everyone is the Raptor now, if not more.
@@Cody38Superyet it has nothing to do with the fact it hasn't room for HMDS. The threat for the F22 comes within the States itself since they plan retirement in 2030's, while the F15 in shape of F15 EX Eagle II will outlive it in service.
@@Gripen90 I didn't say it had anything to do with HMDS...it has nothing to with the F-15 either! It has everything to with #1. It's made almost entirely out of composite material and doesn't have the same service life as an aluminum airframe. #2. It was never constructed with "upgrades" or "modularity" in mind because they were just trying to get the best murder machine they could in the air at the time. #3. The entire production facility was shut down and part of it used to build the F-35, so nothing new can be made for it and spare parts are limited in or able to be produced. #4. It costs too much to maintain. #5. The only reason we bought a few EX's, is not to replace or supplement Raptors but because we're building them anyway because they are not "EX's", they're "Q's" that the QATARI Air Force paid us a shit ton of money to produce and develop because their pilots are still flying C's and they don't want to maintain 35's ! ! And the final reason.....the NGAD will replace it with 5 wingmen each and usher in a new age of fighters and redefine air combat as the world knows it making the Raptor redundant! GET OFF THE HMDS and the F-15, it has nothing to do with either!
No reason to CAPS LOCK. Poster of the video asks/wonders why HMDS isn"t thought for the F22, it is great you know and have the answer, I am not debating it with you, I'm responding to his question.
Yes I know the F22 isn't the same as the F15 as for service life, yet one cannot stop to see the ironi of the F22 to replace the F15 as air superiority fighter, getting outlived by an older airframe/design. replacing the plane that eventually get "replaced" yet
They have tested it with the Scorpiob HMS and it works. The standard helmet is indeed a bit too big.
Looks like an F35 copy. It makes sense they'd use existing parts, I mean, we often do the same thing. It's cheaper. Thrust vectoring will probably be on it. That seems to be a technology the other countries keep in their back pocket for some reason. Maybe to appear less capable. I really wanted the F15 Active to be a thing, as a kid.
Can we mention the su-75 isn't in production and probably never will be...
Find the hardest most expensive way to accomplish a task/mission....
It looks more like the Black Widow to me.
The Su75 is what the X-32 should've looked like.
X-32*
@@traviswalker8933 oh yeah good call. I forgot they dropped the YF. Fixed
Something doesn't add up at about this thing. Is the Su-75 low on performance/payload or short on range? It doesn't have enough thrust to be fast and big. That means it must be small. How are they going to put fuel and weapons in that thing?
It's shorter in range due to the single engine and carrying less fuel due to being smaller in size.
@@traviswalker8933 haven't learned their lesson from the notoriously short-legged MiG-29?
@@140theguy if anything, the performance specs coming out are relatively close to the MiG-29.
I would like his definition of clean f16 means. I see alot of people saying no weapons some say gas other other things so I'm curious.
Its with minimal fuel, no extra weapons
It is obvious that the best option for China and Russia to catch up to NATO is to design and export competitive weapon systems to their allies. The issue is...they are limited on how competitive these systems can be because you cannot give away classified tech as well. You have to train and so on. But they are failing long before that. They are not able to create systems comparable to ours with a high likely hood of winning...without giving away trade secrets. I am sure they have the ability to design state of the art systems in house but that is not enough. And in that...NATO gave them and early...checkmate lol.
Hello
Large wings on a Russian aircraft.... I'm seeing shades of MiG25 in that assessment. Russia is way behind on materials research, so the wing size might be compensating for heavy structure weight instead of maneuverability and payload.
The MiG-29 is pretty maneuverable without the large size so.
MiG29 is a bit different. It definitely does have a low wing loading, and significant lifting-body characteristics (like F15/F14 and newer). I'm just highly skeptical of Russian weapons programs after seeing various failures for years and years. T90S for India, Su57 might never be build in numbers that matter, the accuracy of their "precision" weapons isn't accurate at all. The list goes on. I'm highly skeptical of the Su75, both that it will ever exist much less reach numbers that matter on a battlefield. Meanwhile I think we've reached 1000 F35s, and the weakest spot on that program isn't the aircraft but the fools that tried to low-ball the supply chain like a military program is a McDonalds. Rumsfeld was a twat, and his "transformation" ideas caused years of delays and billions of dollars.@@traviswalker8933
first production we will see in 20 years after they produce 10 more SU57😂😂😂
Everything Russian is smoke & mirrors.
The X-32 was nicknamed "Monica". Gee, I wonder why.
Because of that smile?
@@traviswalker8933 Close, but no, uh, cigar.
I would like to see more African aviation.
I see what you just did there. 😂
The F-22 can never ever win agsinst the SU-75!! How can a F-22 kill a not existing jet made of cardbox only?
PLEASE REVIEW DCS video of Longshot, Its called "The Wall" Its an f - 16 video. I would enjoy your commentary of what's going on with as how much of that simulation you deem accurate as far as modern air combat goes.
Hi, please make a video about KAI KF-21 Boramae
Hii, please make a video on rafale!!
Russian designed aircrafts with american engines will be a match made in heaven❤
X-32 = Seagull Of Death
Ah yes, the 90’s American jet vs make believe 😂
I’ve heard India and other previous Allies backing out are 100% real
Raptor has a 4gen cockpit Ina 5gen jet.
And everyone else is still trying to catch up to it.
It's a 4.5 gen cockpit tbh and we only see this kind of cockpit being implemented into the 4th gen aircrafts very recently.
This channel has great videos but aren’t these dogfighting simulation security risk? It is known government agencies studies enemy combat tactics and seems like dogfight simulator would be the easiest intelligence ever.
No. No it won’t. The handful of Su57 - even if they haven’t been stripped down to the point of no longer being air-worthy would be shot down far outside visual range. Getting bored of this “question” being pondered as if the answer isn’t absolutely obvious.
“Mike Tyson vs paraplegic 6 year old - the answer might surprise you!”
Just £u(k off.
Lmao.
The SU-75, if ever built and taken into serial production, which even the Su-57 has failed in accomplishing, it wouldn't be any time before 2030, more likely 2035-2040. At which time, the Su-75 would proceed to get killed by a 50 year old design in the F22. Russia should have just played nice, gotten rid of their corruption, and tried to join the EU.
I mean, you gotta protect your natural resources and oil or else youll become a middle eastern country
world war is much closer than you think. soon you will see the strength of the Russian army.
The least bubble linving biased american pilot😂
The same usa say in theire time with the fulcrum and flanker, that they designed the f22 in the race🤷♂️
Thank goodness the ugly duckling X-32 lost to the F35 😂😂😂
I'm VERY skeptical the Russians can get the Su75 into production at all, much less in militarily significant numbers, any time in the next 20years. How long have they been working on the Su57? Rhetorical question.
ANY aircraft is first a prototype. It is strange that the fools did not understand this, do not understand and will not understand. SU-57 in serial production. There are already three squadrons of SU-57. But your propaganda will not tell you such information.
Poor wittle russia dreaming big
ХАХАХАХАХАХА
В этом видео он говорит что это надёжный двигатель, а когда сравнивает СУ57 с Ф22. Фу у 57го не надёжные движки УХАХАХХУАХХУАХХУХ
Ну и дурка
Always US bragging 😂😂😂
Things are about to change significantly in the world. AI and Quantum computing are about to come to the forefront and they are and have been operational for awhile now. You just didn't know it. The AI is beyond AGI and may be at singularity level. Pilots will be a thing of the past.
Is it flying or more propaganda?
Pfft su75 will never fly
Most likely
Well, people said the same about the Su-57, so who knows.