Is NASAMS able to intercept the russians missiles in Ukraine
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 сер 2022
- It is known that Ukraine has the old Soviet S-300 air defense systems, Buk systems, and others. With their help, Ukrainians have learned to shoot down more than half of all Russian missiles. This is already an outstanding achievement. But this is not enough. Sometimes a single Russian missile can cause great grief, as has happened more than once.
NASAMS is not the newest anti-aircraft weapon but one of the most effective in the world. This is evidenced by the fact that it is this anti-aircraft complex that protects the White House and the office of the President of the United States. The United States has a similar Patriot system, but the Norwegian NASAMS is considered more reliable.
This complex operates within a radius of 40 km and shoots down aerodynamic targets at an altitude of up to 15 km. NASAMS is capable of simultaneously tracking and hitting multiple targets. And its main advantage is the speed of response to an approaching target, which fluctuates within 10 seconds. The NASAMS complex consists of a radar station that can detect and track up to 60 targets simultaneously. And an anti-aircraft missile launcher, which is located on a highly passable chassis. The anti-aircraft missile flies 1000 meters per hour and is equipped with a high-explosive fragmentation warhead.
This complex can effectively fight against aircraft, helicopters, drones, and cruise missiles, that is, any aerodynamic targets. NASAMS is not designed for ballistic missiles. Appropriate tests by the developer were not carried out. Perhaps they will be tested for their ability to shoot down Russian Iskander ballistic missiles in Ukraine for the first time. It will be one of the most interesting duels.
The Russian Iskander missile is one of the most dangerous missiles in this war. It can become a real challenge for the Norwegian complex.
Iskander is an operational tactical missile system. It can launch two types of missiles, both cruise and ballistic, but the most dangerous are ballistic missiles of the 9M723 type.
This missile rises to a height of more than 100 km and can hit a target at a distance of up to 500 km. From a height, it heads towards the target at a speed of up to 7,000 km per hour. This minimizes the time that anti-aircraft missile systems have to intercept it.
In addition, the Iskander ballistic missile maneuvers before impact and drops decoys that look like the missile itself on the radar. This is what these decoys look like. They were found on the territory of Ukraine after one of Iskander's strikes. They can deceive air defense radars and thermal search missiles. The deception is stuffed with electronics. It emits radio signals that can drown out the radar of the enemy trying to find the Iskander missile. The decoy also contains a heat source to attract incoming missiles.
All this greatly complicates the interception of the Iskander missile.
One such missile weighs almost 4 tons and has a warhead weighing 500 kg, and the diameter of the missile is 920 mm, that is, nearly 1 meter. Accelerating and hitting the target, it causes great destruction. Warheads on a missile can be cluster, high-explosive, and even thermobaric. All of them cause enormous damage, either scattering submunitions over an area equivalent to two football fields, or leaving a crater 8-10 meters deep, or burning all life without a chance of salvation in diameter of more than 60 meters.
But as is often the case with Russian weapons, and as practice shows, Russian missiles are not very accurate and reliable. In general, the Iskander is an extremely expensive weapon, and the fact that Russia is shooting at residential areas with it is evidence of the hopelessness of the occupiers. We have repeatedly witnessed how Russian missiles refuse to work. They can abruptly change trajectory and fall right on the head of those who launch them. Here is an example of such a case.
One NASAMS complex should be enough to protect one city.
You know you're evil when your own missile changes sides 5:17
😂😂😂🤣 lmfao
It's ukrainian SAM.
@@avadhutagita3741 Bull**it. It was a Russian SAM in Alchevsk.
@@akorwin It isn't Alchevsk. Its strike by the ukrainian air defense system Buk on June 21-22.
Stop eating west propaganda
And at 5:09 Ukrainian Tochka-U. Author is a fake dropper who doesn’t even understand missiles, and also advertise nasams like a superweapon, which is nothing more than a drone killer.
@@avadhutagita3741 Note that I wasn't saying it to be NASAMS. It was a Buk SAM. The thing is it was launched by russians in Alchevsk and it fell upon them. The original video was published by a woman living there, and that is why you can't see the exact video in pro-russian media. They only state that it was a Ukrainian launch. That is typical for russian bulls**it propaganda - covering their own fails isn't the worst their fault. I suggest by your name you are from India. Hence you don't speak Russian or Ukrainian. You can find the original video using keywords like "Бук Алчевск".
I would suggest you not to side the evil side and support russia just because you don't like western countries. And don't tell me, a Ukrainian, about "western propaganda" narratives.
Хахаахахаха. "Эта система может легко сбивать калибр и ракеты ка 52"))) но она их никогда не сбивала он забыл сказать)))) ахахахааха
Да-да ржи дальше. Наши уже из херсона бегут,а вы ватаны все ржете. Привет с ДВ )
@@sergeysorokin5732 да очень быстро бегут) месяц бежали) не забывай и народ 130 тысяч бежал) либо иммигрировал, ну это и понятно, там уже могилизация началась... Красавцы ахааахах
хорошая система, ни один жилой дом не уйдёт с курса🤪
Correction, the US uses the THAAD as it's long range protection, NASSAM II as intermediate range protection to protect sensitive building in the US and it has 12 batteries in place allowing it to target 72 different targets at the same time. It is also backed up by a shorter range Avenger Missile Systems so having just one or even 2 layers aren't safe enough.
us doctrine is based around air power and not ground launchers so over all the systems are good but just not used correctly on a doctrine level.
Correction...THAAD is not deployed inside the US. It has only been deployed in Guam, the United Arab Emirates, South Korea and most recently Israel.
The NASAMS currently deployed I'm Washington DC is a short range air defense meant to engage against air breathing targets. It's not a viable missile defense system.
Overall, the US uses a layered, or tiered Missile Defense strategy. The US has about 40 Ground Based Interceptors in California and Alaska, then Aegis. That's it.
The US doesn't have any THAAD or PATRIOT batteries permanently deployed inside the US.
2:24 1000 meter/hour? second? minute?
week
Meters/second. It uses the AMRAAM missiles which go up to mach4, but that depends on altitude too.
this is a superweapon
your welcome 🙏 🤗, think we need a few of these around the UK 🇬🇧 too.
ah not for ballistic missiles so not much use in the UK
We have a much better system more upto date .
LAND CAPTOR
@@garwhittaker3743 ill take a look
How about you think about paying some of yur bills first . 1 million bucks per misile and the modern stuff cant even be hit byit.
3:45 Btw, Iris-T can’t be duped by decoy rockets or airplane flares
NATO secretary really knows how to move the horse and intercept the bishop. Long live Europe may god always in the country with the best artillery.
So russia? maybe nk
It can intercept cruise missiles. Ballistic missiles... not so much. For that you would need something like Barak MX or David's Sling...
Patriot,thaad,meads,sm2,sm6 are usable as abms. The us used hawk missiles back in the 80s to shoot down lance ballistic missiles.
Most informative videos on the net, period.
I never knew what system protected the White House. They don't tell us these things in the local paper in the U.S., lol. (1:31)
Also you need the c ram now.
TLDR no. It can intercept the cruise missile launched from Iskander, not the ballistic missile.
Гос долг Украины скоро перевалит за 200 миллиардов долларов, тем временем) Хороший подарочек для будущих поколений...)
I would love to see them get the thaad system but they are super expensive
Un an après un iskander à détruit le système nasams 😅
BOSNIA LOVES UKRAINE AND UKRAINIEN PEOPLE! SLAVA UKRAINI
The missile in NASams is an AIM120
The usa uses the thaad systems along with nasm and other short range defense
Accurate ballistic missile targeting is very difficult...these missiles are very dangerous becuse These missiles release a lot of kinetic energy😢
And they have evasive systems and electronic warfare. we constantly see the aa mis. the iskander flies way above the range of these short range air defensive systems using what is basically air to air missiles. the western doctrine is air based so the air defense systems are not a strong suit.
i came to this vid looking for that footage which i know is out there, yet the arms industry has a strong search engine influence when it comes to censoring the failures of western weapon systems. its not really failure, its just counter by a newer system.
Same way in the gulf war with the t72 being 5 tech gaps behind but with the roles reversed
it's time to import the iron dome
5:14 that's the funniest shit I've ever seen
unsuccessful Ukrainian air defense test.
The German Iris T is coming soon.
2:25: 1000 m per hour? That is not correct.
Jan is a true politician. Says one thing, does another.
Who is Jan?
one thousand meter per hour - that fast, really????
@ 0:56 This remains to be seen in the near future what....? You mean... " This has yet remained to be seen until the near future " get it right dude
Oh wow! that close up of the decoy looks like it has transistors in it.....WTF? LOL!!
Have you seen transistors? WOW
How easy it is to deceive you. What gullible people in the West...
The author is talking bullshit, meanwhile, he doesn’t even understand missiles.
5:09 ukrainian Tochka-U.
Thank you so much for your help and support.. best regards from Ukraine Odesa.
Our pleasure. Love from California.
Mutually, thanks to the Ukrainians for dying for us. Really, thank you very much.
1000 metre per hour!!
I think you meant per second.
1372 m/s)
Ukraine has shot down Iskander without NASAMS
We help Ukraine means. We are helping us.
which really means you are helping the NWO GLOBALISTS who want us all enslaved with no rights, thx a lot
Ukraine can't win. Than longer continues the war, than more Ukrainians will die. You are sponsoring just this.
Then u can not protect yourself.russia is winning.
@Ashrf Ghmrawi the military industrial complex making a killing. They are not helping Ukraine but robbing it
So help for nothing. Is somehow for our bennifits? No we help to help
U.S testing it's Equipment in Ukraine 😊
Every coin have 2 side ...
Fixed location =sitting duck. Be like BUK, S400 system. Mobile.
Hahaha, nothing can stop a hypersonic missile.
2:22 “1000m/h”, ye, definitely not true. People walk faster than that
iskander flies at 5,9+ nasam flies at 3 mach , you do the math. we already seeing all the nasams self destructing after losing target lock.
Nasam hit 10 of 10 missiles over ukraine yesterday.
@@vikinnorway6725 allegedly. we all know about kievian claims. remember the praising of all the new previous supposed wunderwaffen? Every single system got trashed by the ukranians. in the end. nasam iris etc they shoot conventional air to air rockets. they just now use them from the ground as a stop gap not having airpower.
Thing is it is just going to take a week or so to destroy all AA instillation with sead missions.
claimed 100% success rate. and you are still not mm sus, 10 missiles when 80 launched isnt 100%, that is just faulty math. or as we have been accustomed, lies
Any country that uses Russian missiles should replace them because you can see their accuracy is off by miles!
check your facts, US will send 16 systems... but not yet deliverd..
SLAVA UKRAINI !!!
Min 5:10 ese misil fallido no es un Iskander es Tochka de la era Soviética y el único usuario es Ucrania el ejército Ruso los dio de baja el 2008
One thousand meters per hour really is a missile or a horse? This guy doesn't even check his facts?
I would love to see this duel between NASAMS and Iskander! Though I'm not too optimistic, considering that Russia is running out of missiles. Save some up, Ruzzia! 😉
Supposedly they have been running out of missiles ever since March,yet they keep coming
@@elrodrigo4102 and Artillery and tanks and soldiers
Yep Russian military tech way obsolete and ineffective.
Iskander having decoys surprised the talking heads.
@@elrodrigo4102 Repurposed S-300 air defense missiles and Soviet era scrap metal? Right. And Ukrainian defence shooting down more of them each day!
Hello think of what u are saying, ,1000 meter per hour?u know a messenger pigeon can reach and deliver the message to other side to look for ur missile and make them funny.... LOL
To bad they are not there yet. Washington has dragged their feet on this.
@2:20 it flies "1000 metres per hour" really? ;P that's 1km/h. I walk faster than that
Russians threatening to hit decision making centars?
If they wanted, they could do it from first day, every each day 🤣
Great propaganda video 🤣🤣🤣 saying that Iskanders fail, and showing picture of downed Tochka 🤣
1000 metre pur hour?? i can walk faster hahahaha
It is per second, so about mach 3
@@thorwaldjohanson2526 i know!
Judging by what I just seen, the debris that blows up will indescrimiinantly fall on civilians anyway. But it's my understanding that the Patriot system worked well so we'll see
The civilian casualties from Pearl Harbor were from American AA shells. You want to be in a shelter even if you have good systems.
Why do we give the NASAM systems they are so expensive?I mean i love the Ukraine don't get me wrong but sometimes 1 NASAM is up to 350 Times more expensive than missile that is shooting down....Lets buy them some S-125 or Turkish Ciper-200 or 300?
Любая С400 разипёт самое последнее вооружение, не говоря о С500. Если запад хочет войны оно скоро ее почувствует. Россия отныне лидер мирового порядка. Такие как Путин раз в сто лет рождаются, нам повезло он наш президент
NASAMS👌💪💪💪💪
только Российские системы ПВО что то могут в отличие от никчёмных западных ПВО!!!
I want to see how this air defense will fight with hypersound missiles like Kinzhal and Tsirkon
we already seen it, it loses target lock and flies until it runs out of fuel to then self destruct. ukranians are used to their anti air falling out the sky back on to them or poland or something. so these modern systems operated by nato staf actually self destructing makes them think it hit something
Никак
Thank you nato will you give ukraine nasams.anti aurcraft .from philippines.
Weapons USA 🇺🇲👍💪❤️❤️❤️
So much BS in so short video...
5:09 ukrainian Tocka-U.
5:09, not Iskander, but the ukrainian Tochka-U.
Glory to Ukraine 💙💛
No
"1,000 meter per hour"? The Russian pilot would be eating his dinner before that missile can get to his plane's previous location. 🤣 Please do your job right. This is hilarious.
If you try to correct someone and you have to edit a mere one and a half lines of text, you are off to a bad start. If you leave a typo in the comment after the edit or edits, you might as well delete the comment and take a grammar class.
The Russian pilot would be eating his dinner before that missile could get to his plane's previous location. This poorly worded sentence is now at least grammatically correct.
Additionally, the question mark you used does not follow any question. I hope that doesn't require any further explanation but I can point you in the direction of some excellent resources for English grammar if you don't know what a question is.
@@chaseteter
First, I'm not from an english speaking country and I learned english just from watching Hollywood movies. 🤣 I don't actually see the point of your reply. What is this for? You think you're smarter than me because you can speak better english? I think you're stupid. My comment was not about grammar, it's about the accuracy of information. So? 😊
@@chaseteter on u still didn't debunk what was said with your dumb emotional rant 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🤡🤡🤡
@@ovincent35 Is English as a second language an excuse worth debunking? No one forced them to post. Come correct or not at all if you’re here to correct.
@@chaseteter so that's what u got from the post ,u sheep's in western countries can't debunk u attack people language n grammar
Best quality pictures I have seen. I like seeing Russian assets destroyed. I live in farm county; Ukraine looks like my home. 💛💙👍
Искандер маневрирует, поэтому сбить его никакой хасамс не сможет! А те разрушения на Украине, которые показаны в данном ролике нанесены ПВО, которую размещают в жилой застройке городов на Украине, чтобы РФ это ПВО не уничтожило, то есть военные прячутся за спинами гражданских и когда ракета летит над городом её над ним же и сбивают ПВО Украины, соответственно падает она тоже на этот самый город. Какими надо быть идиотами, чтобы верить во всё то, что показывает обывателю на Западе Ваша пропаганда, гордитесь свободой слова, а ни слова этой самой правды на Западе СМИ не говорят.
Russia shot himar now nasams
Ukraine has Europe's largest deposits of Rare Earth Metals. Now you know the rest of the story
Also newly discovered oil & gas reserves in the Donbas. Putin wants these, plus control of the Black Sea.
Now I understand what is happening to the Russian soldiers why they are running a way, Ukraine receive new batch of weapons, excellent job
Not no more the dont
Useless against the Zircon
Haha Russia can’t afford to shoot off very many Zircons their economy has been neutered and each Zircon cost $210 million USD. How much is that in Ruble? Tomahawk missiles by comparison are intercept-able but only cost $5 million and are designed to be an all around effective cruise missile, Zircon is primarily an anti ship missile it was actually designed to sink a U.S. carrier. But Ukraine has no navy except for some old US Coast Guard cutters and patrol/attack boats, so what good is an anti ship hypersonic missile going to do? Bankrupt Russia?🤣
USA No1 victory to Ukraine
💩
I could really do without the propaganda. It was good up until the predictions and claims of things you couldn't possibly know.
S-300 has many modern versions.
But yes - they aren't in Ukraine. But the old ukrainian S-300 is still better than NASAMS(NASAMS is a garbage against UAVs not more). In my opinion, you are engaged in useless advertising and propaganda.
At 5:09, not Iskander, but the ukrainian Tochka-U. You don't even know missiles. Shame on you.
5:19 unsuccessful Ukrainian air defense test.
Short answer: Not it's not capable
Не се напъвайте,видяхме.
Russian eskandars are crab. It prooved to be juncks in kharabagh war
In this case, the american AGM 88 HARM is garbage. After all, the russians sometimes get them whole by shooting them down by electronic warfare, although in most cases AGM HARM are shot down by air defense systems.
Armenia was given expired Iskanders for free. Overdue Javelins were given to Ukraine 2 years ago. Out of 30 rockets, only 5 were fired. Similar case.
@@avadhutagita3741 i assure you... youget nothing for free ... specially from Russia
Finger to Putin and to hi fail army, God bless Ukrainian forces they crashes the Russian army, Thanks to all countries helping Ukraine.
You're talking nonsense. Google will help you.
Good money making stories collection of videos and pictures and written your stories very well to make money. Over statement and money making stories while people are dying using this war to make money.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
I love Russian and Ukraine womens
Propaganda 😂😂
the Norwegian-developed air defense system NASAMS, 100% hit-proof in Ukraine.
Duplicate video …US bots
Slava ukrainia 🔱⚡🦑🇺🇦✌🏻🇹🇷
Peak of youR propaganda.....
"" Haa..ha ...
Anyhow,you are trYinG to make yoUr side win,even in youtube.....
U are just joking what about shahid 136 iranian drone -
This one is no match to Russian hypersonic missile 😂
Bla bla bla propaganda bla bla bla...
We love and support Russia ppl and military
Terrible accent screwed up the interesting video. You might want to either work on your accent or engage someone else in the process.
One remark on your info. Take it, you referred to 1000 kms per hour, not 1000 meters per hour. Cause if it was the latter one, it would have no chance to hit fighter jets or cruise missiles, they fly far faster than that
what a propaganda video....all so bad by Russians....
west fake
Ukrainians fighting with russia weapons, s300,...epic😂😂😂where is the pride?😂😂
Американцы привыкли рекламировать и продавать свое дерьмо в красивой упаковке. Мы, русские, делаем очень качественное вооружение, но не хотим и не можем преувеличивать его достоинства. Где американское вооружение себя проявило во всей красе? Да нигде, потому что Америка показывает свою военную мощь только в слабых странах 3-го мира, где нет интегрированной системы ПВО и т.д. Ваш распиаренный ф-22 и Ф-35 не летает в регионах с повышенной влажностью и при отрицательных температурах,т.к. это снижает в разы его "малозаметность". Ваш хваленый Абрамс имеет огромные проблемы с обслуживанием, пробивается старым рпг-7. Ваши джевелины бесполезны против наших т-72б3, что уже говорить о новых т-90 прорыв. В реальных боевых условиях ваше оружие -это не более чем распиаренное дерьмо.
Украина обязательно одержит победу ✊🇺🇦спасибо США за всю помощь, спасибо всем американцам, всем налогоплательщикам США, сегодня в Украине война против мирового зла, против путина, которого обязательно остановят украинские военные 🚀💥Слава Украине 🇺🇦Героям Слава🇺🇦✊
Norwegian Nasam did well yesterday. Shot 10 of 10
Go🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺