The Politics of Operation Torch

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 тра 2023
  • The Politics of Operation Torch
    With Michael S. Neiberg
    Part of the Torch to Tunis series on WW2TV
    • Torch to Tunis
    In this final show of our Torch to Tunis series we take a look at the rather complicated geopolitical situation in North Africa in 1942 that influenced Allied plans both before and during the landings.
    If you liked this video please consider leaving us a thank you donation. To the right of the up and down thumbs and share button is the heart shaped Thanks button - it helps us keep producing material.
    Michael Neiberg is the Chair of War Studies at the US Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, where he teaches history, strategy, and regional studies.
    neiberg102.wixsite.com/michae...
    When France Fell: The Vichy Crisis and the Fate of the Anglo-American Alliance by Michael Neiberg
    UK uk.bookshop.org/a/5843/978067...
    USA bookshop.org/a/21029/97806742...
    You can become a UA-cam Member and support us here / @ww2tv
    You can become a Patron here / ww2tv
    Please click subscribe for updates
    Social Media links -
    / ww2tv
    / ww2tv
    / ww2tv
    WW2TV Bookshop - where you can purchase copies of books featured in my UA-cam shows. Any book listed here comes with the personal recommendation of Paul Woodadge, the host of WW2TV. For full disclosure, if you do buy a book through a link from this page WW2TV will earn a commission.
    UK - uk.bookshop.org/shop/WW2TV
    USA - bookshop.org/shop/WW2TV
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 59

  • @philbosworth3789
    @philbosworth3789 Рік тому +9

    That was a good explanation from Michael about a very complicated situation. I can see why he deservedly has such a good reputation.

  • @davidk7324
    @davidk7324 Рік тому +5

    Thank you Woody and Dr. Neiberg. Faithful members of the WW2TV community are truly fortunate. Often during WW2TV shows the guest(s) or Woody will say "it's complicated." I think most everything in war, including policy, is complicated and the historian's challenge is to effectively "explain what goes into making something complicated" rather than detailing minutiae. Superlative teaching professor Neiberg, you threaded the needle today.

  • @lewistrott417
    @lewistrott417 Рік тому +3

    I very much enjoy these academic discussions to go along with the military talks. Movies aren't made about these subjects, but they are the background information for the actual boots on the ground stories. Great presentation by Prof. Neilberg who works right up the road from my stomping grounds at Gettysburg.

  • @garymiller_85
    @garymiller_85 Рік тому +2

    Fantastic. The politics of France and Vichy, is incredibly complex.

    • @WW2TV
      @WW2TV  Рік тому

      Yes, and Michael helps make sense of it all

  • @davidlavigne207
    @davidlavigne207 Рік тому +5

    I am so glad I took the time to view this excellent discussion. Inviting Michael was a stroke of genius as he is such a knowledgeable person about the politics of Torch. I must say, Woody, that your channel helps transport many of your viewers like me, who may never have the chance to visit these remote sites, an opportunity to travel back in time and explore the past. I feel a debt of gratitude to you and so many of your guests, and viewers as well, for bringing us this opportunity for historical study and interaction. Thank you Sir!

    • @WW2TV
      @WW2TV  Рік тому +2

      You are very welcome David

  • @edl1973
    @edl1973 2 місяці тому

    Love Mike. One of the best speakers.

  • @gerryconstant4914
    @gerryconstant4914 Рік тому +2

    This last March my than high school grandson did a podcast on Operation Torch for his Advanced Placement WWII History Class. The podcast is called Tigers By The Fire & his school being in New Orleans he spend time at the National WWII Museum doing research.
    He is now a plebe at the US Merchant Marine Academy in Kings Point NY. Give it a listen.

    • @whos1st
      @whos1st 3 місяці тому

      Best of luck and safe sailing to your grandson 👍

  • @catholicmilitantUSA
    @catholicmilitantUSA Рік тому +1

    When I was a teen I used to love watching the episode of "Why We Fight" called Divide and Conquer where the 1940 campaign was dealt with. Near the end I was puzzled because my DVD seemed to have been doctored when De Gaulle was mentioned, and there was another French general shaking his hand when this glitch occurred. Even as a child I suspected that there was something going on and it was doctored on purpose. So I went on UA-cam and checked the version there. That version said "General de Gaulle AND THE FAMOUS GENERAL GIRAUD." Those words were missing from my DVD and I was immediately interested in the politics behind the story.
    And around 18 years later this video is the best discussion on the subject I have ever watched!

  • @linnharamis1496
    @linnharamis1496 5 місяців тому +1

    Excellent program- thank you.👍

  • @scottgrimwood8868
    @scottgrimwood8868 Рік тому +2

    An outstanding show on the politics of North Africa. l really appreciated hearing that Ike would have learned from the political mess that was French North Africa on how to handle Operation Overlord.

  • @exharkhun5605
    @exharkhun5605 9 днів тому

    I love that the moment Mark Clark does something you feel you have to give him some respect for, he looses his pants.

  • @morningstar9233
    @morningstar9233 Рік тому +1

    Very enlightening. Knew Torch would be complicated. Thanks Paul and Dr.Neiburg for guiding us through an operation of which I for one knew only the broad strokes. The detail was fascinating and thought provoking.

  • @steventhompson399
    @steventhompson399 Рік тому +1

    Great video. I remember Michael Neiburg from another talk on UA-cam about the first world war I saw a while ago

  • @TheVigilant109
    @TheVigilant109 Рік тому +3

    Excellent presentation by Michael. I learned a lot tonight

  • @lookythat2
    @lookythat2 28 днів тому

    What an excellent presentation!

  • @vcv6560
    @vcv6560 5 місяців тому

    Thank you for this discussion. It was the prelude to Torch that introduced me to these political considerations. I had been in Churchell in 2007, but only learned of Gen. Mark Clarks' mission in 2010 reading Atkinson's first volume. To read the French fired on and killed Americans set me on my heels.
    As for visiting Churchell...I was that close to history and hadn't realized the significance.

  • @iankerridge5720
    @iankerridge5720 Рік тому +3

    Surely, the reason Ike was in charge of Overlord was how he managed the minefield of Torch so well? Also, to be fair to Charles de Gaulle, he was a genuine Hero de La Belle France in that he was a Patriotic Frenchman who wanted The Best for his Country.

    • @WW2TV
      @WW2TV  Рік тому

      Yrs indeed

  • @duwop544
    @duwop544 Рік тому +1

    By the way, though CC is not *immediately* available on YT, I've seen it added after the live show. It can be useful.

  • @philbosworth3789
    @philbosworth3789 Рік тому +4

    Now I’m not suggesting you do this Woody, but having watched the current (May 2023) @WW2TV series of episodes on Torch to Tunis along with many previous episodes from this channel on the same subject it occurred to me that if they were all fitted together there is more ‘airtime’ here on @WW2TV covering just the Torch/Morocco/Algeria/Tunisia actions than the entire content of the acclaimed ‘The World at War’ series which covered the whole timeframe of the war and every theatre of operations. All this, free of charge, or better for as much/little as you feel fit to contribute is fantastic value.

    • @davidlavigne207
      @davidlavigne207 Рік тому +2

      I absolutely loved the World at War series as a young man Phil. I agree with you wholeheartedly that WW2TV is a fantastic resource! This venue has allowed those of us with like minds to explore the many facets of that war in a way that is unique. I may not make all the live chats, but I do enjoy the many comments made by you and others.

    • @WW2TV
      @WW2TV  Рік тому +4

      Yes, and a few more patrons and members would be super

  • @markodeen4105
    @markodeen4105 Рік тому

    Fascinating!

  • @patrickwentz8413
    @patrickwentz8413 Рік тому

    Really good stuff straight out of Clauswitz.

  • @jimplummer4879
    @jimplummer4879 8 місяців тому

    There could not have been any landings without all the background Political dealings and planning.

  • @iankerridge5720
    @iankerridge5720 Рік тому +3

    Did anyone ever get on well with Charles de Gaulle?! except Charles de Gaulle?!

    • @marks_sparks1
      @marks_sparks1 Рік тому

      General Louis Spears (British envoy) got on very well with de Gaulle.

    • @daverhoades5596
      @daverhoades5596 Рік тому

      Good question,not really sure.

    • @brunol-p_g8800
      @brunol-p_g8800 6 місяців тому

      Churchill got quite well with him and had developed a deep friendship with him, but as they both were stubborn with similar characters they wouldn’t keep their tongues in their pockets.
      They also had a common dislike of Roosevelt.

  • @ronaldfinkelstein6335
    @ronaldfinkelstein6335 Рік тому

    Fortunately, they only had to deal with Darlan for about 6 weeks...he was assassinated on December 24.

    • @WW2TV
      @WW2TV  Рік тому +1

      Which is exactly what we say

    • @brunol-p_g8800
      @brunol-p_g8800 6 місяців тому

      “Had to deal” is a big thing to say, it the USA who got Darlan out of jail and appointed him.

  • @billballbuster7186
    @billballbuster7186 Рік тому +3

    You keep hearing this from the Americans, but there was no way an American army could have landed in France in 1942. The US Army was only starting to expand from peacetime levels and there were no resources for the size of the invasion force required to be successful.
    The Vichy French were still angry over Mers el Kebir, but that was mainly due to an arrogant French Admiral Gensoul, who sacrificed his men for his pride.

    • @WW2TV
      @WW2TV  Рік тому +2

      Yep no way at all, but it keeps coming up

    • @billballbuster7186
      @billballbuster7186 Рік тому +1

      @@WW2TV It does make you wonder what the British Generals were thinking when they heard this nonsense

    • @daverhoades5596
      @daverhoades5596 Рік тому +1

      There was no way in hell that the allies could have invaded France in 42.Not sure how many American divisions were in The UK at the time but I think it would have been a catastrophe.

    • @billballbuster7186
      @billballbuster7186 Рік тому

      @@daverhoades5596 The Americans were so adamant, the Dieppe Raid was staged in part to shut them up.

    • @Bullet-Tooth-Tony-
      @Bullet-Tooth-Tony- Рік тому

      @@daverhoades5596 The Americans wanted to use 9 Allied divisions ( most of those being British, and a few US divisions) to land at Cherbourg on a narrow beachhead against 25 German divisions in France just to basically show Stalin that Britain could also sacrifice it's population to prove they were making a contribution to the war in Europe. Yep, it would've been a disaster.

  • @jimplummer4879
    @jimplummer4879 8 місяців тому

    World War II as totally a World war.

  • @Worldpeaceforeverremains
    @Worldpeaceforeverremains 8 місяців тому

    We let you establish for a bit so you can build all that stuff that you built and then we kicked you out because you can't be trusted. Long live the king.

  • @Falconing89
    @Falconing89 10 місяців тому

    How did the Jewish men, women, and children end up in Israel. Asking for a friend.

    • @WW2TV
      @WW2TV  10 місяців тому

      I don't understand the question? Which group and when specifically?

    • @Falconing89
      @Falconing89 10 місяців тому

      The Jewish people that were in Germany, at that time very few were in Israel@@WW2TV

    • @WW2TV
      @WW2TV  10 місяців тому

      Well Israel didnt exist then, do you mean Palestine?

    • @Falconing89
      @Falconing89 10 місяців тому

      Israel as a city did exist but not as a country, you know what im asking though how did they get to that place out of Germany without being killed. @@WW2TV

    • @WW2TV
      @WW2TV  10 місяців тому +1

      There was Jerusalem in Palestine but not a city called Israel, but your question makes no sense. Jewish then was not a Nationality, so Jews could travel on passports, real or fake from various Countries. Plus just like today, people can be smuggled through borders or travel via ingenious routes, but most of Europe's Jews who were lucky enough to escape did not head for the Middle East which is why your question is odd - sorry

  • @markrunnalls7215
    @markrunnalls7215 Рік тому

    Very good indeed ,in places could see that it must have been a tense situation ,really great massive thanks .