I may not be full on supporter of fusionism, but working with liberty minded conservatives in important areas such war, economics, culture etc. is an alliance and friendship that ought to pursued and continue to be put together.
even though Paul is closer to a Parlo conservative than a Paleo libertarian I still appreciate his contributions, I do feel he's lagging behind slightly in the latest oppositional strategies to the woke though, even if he does understand the threat they pose. still non the less it's great to have his work to referance and to always know where our roots come from which stand true for simply historical referance as well as contemporary insights.
_Getting along_ - Paul's circuitous meaning of Fusionism is fine until it's used as a means to pressure someone on the other side into voting for their politician. That's like that new over-friendly person who invites you to dinner, using your relationship to pitch a pyramid scheme before you run out the door. Bottom line: if you have a line-in-the-sand issue, you won't be voting for anyone who violates that. So, if it makes you feel better, go ahead and socialize with Libertarians/Conservatives...heck, maybe you can persuade them on some topic/issue. But don't get your hopes up thinking such _getting along_ will translate into toppling the common arch nemesis/enemy - the Leftists in government/academia. If you want to do that, you'll need to persuade who gives them power...the _Idiocracy_ .
yea, Pual's a bit dated on his approach and is trying to apply old fusionist ideas to combat modern problems. The right is much different than it was in the 90s, Paleo libertarians are all but gone, kind of having its last hurrah or its final swan song so speak with Ron Puals last presidential run in 2012. if there's going to be a fusionism to create another movment it'll have to come from the more reactionary libertarians like Hoppeans and Taylorites, also the disodent right probably has more neo reactionaries like your Auron MacIntyre types and new waves of Orthodox Christians and atheist reactionaries than the older traditionaly catholic or baptist Paleos. its a real hodgepodge these days which makes it more complicated but also more interesting.
I may not be full on supporter of fusionism, but working with liberty minded conservatives in important areas such war, economics, culture etc. is an alliance and friendship that ought to pursued and continue to be put together.
Paul is great. I subscribed to Chronicles shortly after hearing few of his speeches.
Based and Paulpilled
Can you elaborate your 3 words
@@scottcoleman5088 Do keep up on contemporary vernacular
Let’s go Paul! One of my Favorite PaleoCons
Brilliant. An aid to understanding the historical context of some of the present intellectual trends.
The world would be a much better place if paleos were in charge of America. ❤
even though Paul is closer to a Parlo conservative than a Paleo libertarian I still appreciate his contributions, I do feel he's lagging behind slightly in the latest oppositional strategies to the woke though, even if he does understand the threat they pose.
still non the less it's great to have his work to referance and to always know where our roots come from which stand true for simply historical referance as well as contemporary insights.
Interesting talk.
This is great!
Paul Got Fried
The path out of fluid concentrations of power isn’t more decentralized power.
Paleo-Conservatarianism
_Getting along_ - Paul's circuitous meaning of Fusionism is fine until it's used as a means to pressure someone on the other side into voting for their politician. That's like that new over-friendly person who invites you to dinner, using your relationship to pitch a pyramid scheme before you run out the door.
Bottom line: if you have a line-in-the-sand issue, you won't be voting for anyone who violates that. So, if it makes you feel better, go ahead and socialize with Libertarians/Conservatives...heck, maybe you can persuade them on some topic/issue. But don't get your hopes up thinking such _getting along_ will translate into toppling the common arch nemesis/enemy - the Leftists in government/academia. If you want to do that, you'll need to persuade who gives them power...the _Idiocracy_ .
Idiocracy? You call the financial powers idiocracy?
Fusionism won’t happen until we stop running spoilers against decent republicans!
16:04
lost me when you tried to identify some for of trust via assosiati9n only. From a decades old picture.
yea, Pual's a bit dated on his approach and is trying to apply old fusionist ideas to combat modern problems.
The right is much different than it was in the 90s, Paleo libertarians are all but gone, kind of having its last hurrah or its final swan song so speak with Ron Puals last presidential run in 2012.
if there's going to be a fusionism to create another movment it'll have to come from the more reactionary libertarians like Hoppeans and Taylorites, also the disodent right probably has more neo reactionaries like your Auron MacIntyre types and new waves of Orthodox Christians and atheist reactionaries than the older traditionaly catholic or baptist Paleos.
its a real hodgepodge these days which makes it more complicated but also more interesting.