@@palopinto4065 I'm pretty sure she wasn't, and frankly I feel for the guy who did the repairs. He didn't cover himself by having receipts, unfortunately
Imagine being this old and allowing crooked pipes to ruin your whole summer. Summers with family by the pool are some of the best memories I have with my loved ones. Such a shame.
WHAT? The plaintiff is supposedly a lawyer yet didn't ask for a contract. The old pipes were already coming out of the ground and he had to connect them to the new white joints, which he did. Unless he was being paid to completely dig up all the old pipes to lay them slightly further apart, then he did exactly what he was asked to do, and since when does an owner leave all the pipes exposed, as soon as you put a box cover around it all, no-one will see whether or not they are slightly skew-whiff. I don't see why he was made to refund her $400, he had to buy extra parts, he did the job and it all worked perfectly...
@arianefr78, It is one of the few times I do not agree with a JM verdict. The defendant did exactly what he was hired to do, those pipes were crooked long before he arrived, it wasn't his responsibility to straighten them. Coming from a trades/construction family as the good judge as shared many times, how did that one go over her head?
i believe the defendant and there is no way on earth that this woman is a lawyer and just the way she spoke to the judge was proof she had no courtroom experience or knowledge regarding how to address a judge and i cant believe the judge did not cross examine her claims more.
and not to seem prejudiced but americans must be very careful when doing work for immigrants from east european countries because there are language barriers to overcome when making verbal agreements and it seems that people from east europe are more likely to use the legal system and sue rather than people from other parts of the world .
I completely agree that in a perfect world, the defendant should have won. Unfortunately for him, he shot himself in the foot by not producing receipts. Neither to the plaintiff or, more importantly, the Judge. That is why he lost. Failing to produce evidence on his behalf caused him to look unprofessional and possibly shady and/or lazy. Even though I disagree with the verdict, I understand why it happened.
I don't understand the logic for the lawsuit. The pipes were crooked before the defendant arrived. If she wanted the pipes straightened, that should gave been part of the scope of work, and fully costed (and paid for). There was nothing shoddy about the defendant's work. The motor and filter were installed correctly, and it still works. What did he do wrong?
She was also claiming it "leaked". Of course, it like only came up in fly by. It was all about anesthetics, exactly. My dad is a retired plumber & pipes especially 40+ yr old 1s can only move so much w/o risk of breaking or cracking. You're not just looking at the exposed area that can be damaged by manipulation but what's underground by the movement. If that happens it's gonna cost them a great deal more than $700 to repair. She'll probably sue the next guy claiming he did all the damage if that happens even though it's just what happens to things as they age... they break down over time.
he did nothing wrong with the exception of not providing a materials receipt. The judge got it wrong. On too many occasions she fancies herself a handyman because her father did construction the fact is she's not.
be carerful when entering into an agreement with people that speak english as a second language as there are language barriers and they may think u are agreeing to something that u never agreed to , and this is especially true with people from eastern european countries because they are more likely to sue because they come from socialist countries where the people rely on the government to solve every problem in their life .
How about this; we be grateful that we have a pool when so many would take one crooked pipes and all. How about as long as it doesn't bother the functionality of the pool, we stick a piece of lattice in front of it, get on a floatie in the pool with a drink 🍹 and chillax? The plaintiffs are Blessed if this is the most pressing turmoil they have in their lives!
I really believe the plaintiff lied about being a lawyer! And if she lied about that so freely and easily then the defendant must be telling the truth about he told them about the pipes being crooked. She's no lawyer, not once did she use any legal terms and I highly doubt a lawyer would have paid someone in full for a job as disappointing as the plaintiff's are saying, I just do not believe them. And I wish judge Milan had seen through that.
🤣 I love the more personal questions they get so I do stay til the end for it. I especially stayed this time just for you lol. That was a sick burn, he said he'd get her later for that... proof if anything happens 😆
I don’t get it how is it the defendants fault for the crooked pipes? 💀 they’re literally in the ground that’s how the moved over the 40+ years they’ve been in the ground 😂 like I believe the defendant when he told them that he could fix it but they would have to pay and they were just being cheap I disagree with the verdict on this one
Agree.....I think now that the connector fittings and pipes to connect the new filter and pump are white...it stands out and she is blaming the plumber for pipes that have moved in 40 years underground....Nope ....bad ruling the plumber is not at fault...Judge M got this one wrong...Have a good day....
Judge allowed her OCD to sway her ruling....A buzzing sound nobody can hear..She makes hubby pack up and they move to another hotel or room?....Poor John ....patience of a saint.....
Legal training in the old Soviet Union was nothing like what it is here. They were trained, strictly to support the Communist regime while making it look like they actually cared about justice.
Did not agree at all with this verdict. I don’t believe this messed their entire summer up. They still could use the pool. If the defendant is really at fault it would be for not providing receipts for the extra costs. That amount should have been what was returned to the plaintiffs. Didn’t see how JM got her figures for what was owed since the plaintiff’s didn’t provide another estimate and how did she know if the work was done poorly without another expert opinion. I call bologna on this one. Z
How hard is it for people to create contracts that spell out specifically what a job entails, especially when it comes to home inprovements/repairs? I expected more from a lawyer (plaintiff) and an entrepreneur (defendant).
The black pipes were run to a specific area. After that you connect the new pipes to them. Add to that IT WORKS. They shouldn’t have gotten anything back.
After a little digging- Serafima lunin is in fact, not an attorney. She was employed by a law firm- as an office manager. I know that all of you are probably just as ‘shocked’ as I was to find out that little bit of info.. 🙄 🙃🙂🙃🙂🙃
Boo, the judge took a guess as to what the damages are even though she never saw what the finished job looked like, they dug up the area and then took pictures, how can she possibly know what was or wasn't his fault, especially without an estimate from a different plumber. Shouldn't have rewarded them, besides it looking crooked it was impossible to know the extent of work needed or if he was neglectful in anyway.
Judge J: You have a deep voice, Marilyn; have you ever been mistaken for a man?" Judge M: No. Have you? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Now *that's a perfect comeback for a couple married forever. I know because I have that kind of marriage and wouldn't let that slip by, either. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Who knew she was a comedian?
Not the 1st time he's mentioned her having a deep voice. Think it may be an issue for him? I don't even think it's that deep. "Ever get mistaken for a man?" "I don't know' have you?" Burn!
I agree with the defendant. I think he offered to fix the pipes but there would be an extra cost to fix what was there and she just did not want to pay anything.
One of the few times where she required no proof of the agreement. No proof that he screwed up, so he should only owe the extra fees he couldn't provide receipts for
Exactly what I just wrote in my comment. She just pulled figures from her rear and took the word of the plaintiff’s that the defendants work was done wrong. Not fair at all.
well, the plaintiff is a 'lawyer' its mates rates by the judge it was a retro fit to an existing pipe system judge should have required a before picture of how the pipes were attached to the old pump and filter
Nobody took before and after photos? Defendant has no receipts? Old man on the couch couldn't get a word in edgewise? *♫ Things That Make You Go, Hmm ♫*
I fabricate and install aquariums and ponds from scratch for over 30 years.... My business is in Los Angeles. I have dealt with thousands of outdoor projects relative to the plaintiffs. The judge surely got this one wrong 100.... The installer is correct by not wanting to move old existing pvc or abs pipe and fittings as they can crack easily when weather worn and pressurized over past years... I speculate and trust the defendant gave them an option and bid of digging out and re piping almost everything.... This coat was much higher than just the attachments to the new sand filter and pump.... 700 bucks is nothing...... He was not lying about the cost of valves and fittings , sand, glue et al..... Fill that dirt hole and the piping does not look crooked as they made it look much worse by digging down. The large mistake the defendant made was not giving a clear invoice of the cost of parts used.... Guys like this and in my trade often have spare valves and fittings from years of work laying around and is likely why he has no receipts.... He did not prepare evidence for this case and lost his labor profit.. He should have gone back to check and may have won just on that..... Lesson to the public out there...... CHEAP IS NOT GOOD! YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR!. I would have charged 2 thousand for that job and all would look clean and immaculate with clear glue.... Yes they would have paid 3 x amount however the plumbing would last decades and East to replace pump if needed with union firings to plug and play.... Great service people always think ahead.... CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP....... That’s what happens when you want the cheapest price !
I disagree with the judge on this one, I 100% believe him when he says he told them that he could replace the Crooked pipes and that they just didn't want to pay to do that, not only that but you can tell by looking at the picture that the bottom black pipes are old they weren't newly installed.
Always have a detailed contract especially when dealing with senior citizens. The fact is at this age they are potentially forgetting 30 percent or more of what happened in a day. Not all seniors but it's just a fact that memory goes for many at this age.
Not a good verdict at all. How many times does the judge say the plaintiff must bring the proof. They did not and the blue collar guy is made to look bad. Apparently in New York the bar exam must be fairly simple. Doesn't she also say when attorney's appear she holds them to a higher standard because they should know better.
What’s makes this a bit different is that the proof are that the pictures do not put the best light on the defendant’s work. It does look sloppy but I 100% believe him when he says that they were already crooked. But he doesn’t have any proof that he told them it would look that way.
@@peezypeeze9140 why does he need to prove that, he's not the one filling the lawsuit? The standard for a civil trial is the preponderance of the evidence, which means more likely than not. The only evidence is he said she said to me that is a wash. At the end of the day the burden of proof is on the plaintiff and she had none and more should be expected from her if she really is a lawyer which I question.
@@Channel-JJ since the plaintiff had proof of terrible looking pipes, the burden of proof then shifts to the defendant to had evidence and a defense on why those pipes looked like that.
I don't think he should have had to pay them back. If the pipes were already sticking out of the ground and he didn't do anything to replace those pipes they knew the pipes were crooked already.
Yeah one of the times I disagree with the judge on her disagreement. Those plaintiffs are just ridiculous. One of the times I'm glad the money doesn't come out of the "loser's" pocket.
This is the first time I’ve ever fundamentally disagreed with the verdict on The People’s Court. I wholeheartedly believe the plaintiff decided not to pay the expensive job of correcting the old pipes and that’s why she hasn’t gotten an estimate for a repair- she didn’t intend to pay what it costs to do the job she wanted. She just wanted to pay for a bandaid. Thumbs down.
the judge got this one wrong the guy did what they asked and we all know the pipes will never be changed the 'lawyer' just wanted it free and got it almost free
The look on the woman's face when the judge asked why she didn't get it fixed says everything, it works but doesn't look pretty so why get it fixed when you can build a box around it and get a very stupid tv judge to pay her for it!
Another poor decision from the judge. Those pipes were crooked to begin with. She always says she is from a long list of contractors. I would love to see there work and see it. I wonder if they are perfect. She has it in on cotactors. I think the lawyer just wanted a free job or close to it.
I love Judge Milian but she needs to stop using "I have OCD" as a casual term. People are actually suffering with it. Liking things a certain way is much different than a disorder that can ruin your life.
I have been seeing these types of comments about JM ALOT lately...its almost like her and JJ almost traded places...I do have to say that JM isn't anywhere as brutal and rude as JJ though...and that is a good thing...lol
Milian certainly does seem like she does have OCD. I knew she had something so I'm happy she finally admitted it. But the job the defendant did was horrible which is why the plantiff recieved some money back.
This judge man, ha ha remember guys handy men screw the customers charge them the going rates always never do favors every penny the guy being sued never had a chance to pled his case this judge lmao rough justice lmao couldn’t be more right! I guess even lmao, judges have bad days.
If she’s really a lawyer, then she’d know you don’t say ‘listen’ to a judge.
Just because she plaintiff said she was a lawyer does not mean she actually was. People use that tactic to intimidate.
@@palopinto4065 I'm pretty sure she wasn't, and frankly I feel for the guy who did the repairs. He didn't cover himself by having receipts, unfortunately
Oh I know right. That's exactly 💯 what I thought haha 😄
Imagine being this old and allowing crooked pipes to ruin your whole summer. Summers with family by the pool are some of the best memories I have with my loved ones. Such a shame.
Right put a small fence around it or something haha 😄
Suing over crooked pipes? What an entitled ‘lawyer’, if she really is.
WHAT? The plaintiff is supposedly a lawyer yet didn't ask for a contract. The old pipes were already coming out of the ground and he had to connect them to the new white joints, which he did. Unless he was being paid to completely dig up all the old pipes to lay them slightly further apart, then he did exactly what he was asked to do, and since when does an owner leave all the pipes exposed, as soon as you put a box cover around it all, no-one will see whether or not they are slightly skew-whiff. I don't see why he was made to refund her $400, he had to buy extra parts, he did the job and it all worked perfectly...
@arianefr78, It is one of the few times I do not agree with a JM verdict.
The defendant did exactly what he was hired to do, those pipes were crooked long before he arrived, it wasn't his responsibility to straighten them.
Coming from a trades/construction family as the good judge as shared many times, how did that one go over her head?
i believe the defendant and there is no way on earth that this woman is a lawyer and just the way she spoke to the judge was proof she had no courtroom experience or knowledge regarding how to address a judge and i cant believe the judge did not cross examine her claims more.
and not to seem prejudiced but americans must be very careful when doing work for immigrants from east european countries because there are language barriers to overcome when making verbal agreements and it seems that people from east europe are more likely to use the legal system and sue rather than people from other parts of the world .
I completely agree that in a perfect world, the defendant should have won. Unfortunately for him, he shot himself in the foot by not producing receipts. Neither to the plaintiff or, more importantly, the Judge. That is why he lost. Failing to produce evidence on his behalf caused him to look unprofessional and possibly shady and/or lazy. Even though I disagree with the verdict, I understand why it happened.
Her eyes suffered all year looking at it. Oh my!
Had she consulted a doctor she would have been told to "Stop looking at it."
I don't understand the logic for the lawsuit. The pipes were crooked before the defendant arrived. If she wanted the pipes straightened, that should gave been part of the scope of work, and fully costed (and paid for). There was nothing shoddy about the defendant's work. The motor and filter were installed correctly, and it still works. What did he do wrong?
Exactly. No idea why slight angles, (not perfect vertical pipes) would be a problem.
Doesn't the function mean more than the aesthetics? Ugh
She was also claiming it "leaked". Of course, it like only came up in fly by. It was all about anesthetics, exactly.
My dad is a retired plumber & pipes especially 40+ yr old 1s can only move so much w/o risk of breaking or cracking. You're not just looking at the exposed area that can be damaged by manipulation but what's underground by the movement. If that happens it's gonna cost them a great deal more than $700 to repair. She'll probably sue the next guy claiming he did all the damage if that happens even though it's just what happens to things as they age... they break down over time.
he did nothing wrong with the exception of not providing a materials receipt. The judge got it wrong. On too many occasions she fancies herself a handyman because her father did construction the fact is she's not.
be carerful when entering into an agreement with people that speak english as a second language as there are language barriers and they may think u are agreeing to something that u never agreed to , and this is especially true with people from eastern european countries because they are more likely to sue because they come from socialist countries where the people rely on the government to solve every problem in their life .
No way that old Karen is a lawyer.
If that woman is a lawyer,I am a judge🙄🙄🙄! They didn’t want to pay for a job the defendant shouldn’t have take🙄. Nobody should have win in that case!
If litigants got clear contracts between each other we wouldn't have anything to watch. 😆 😂
Good morning and happy Monday!
Is there such a thing lol
@@clifffischer4409 hell yea I don't work Mondays and all my fav youtube channels post Mondays, I love them!
This woman who does not know how to behave in Court.
Calls out over people
Doesn't have proof/Estimate.
Written quote?
Is a Lawyer?
How about this; we be grateful that we have a pool when so many would take one crooked pipes and all. How about as long as it doesn't bother the functionality of the pool, we stick a piece of lattice in front of it, get on a floatie in the pool with a drink 🍹 and chillax?
The plaintiffs are Blessed if this is the most pressing turmoil they have in their lives!
Another case where the vendor should have walked away and NOT done anything if their were problems in the beginning that weren't going to be fixed.
I really believe the plaintiff lied about being a lawyer! And if she lied about that so freely and easily then the defendant must be telling the truth about he told them about the pipes being crooked. She's no lawyer, not once did she use any legal terms and I highly doubt a lawyer would have paid someone in full for a job as disappointing as the plaintiff's are saying, I just do not believe them. And I wish judge Milan had seen through that.
Went right over the peoples court judge lmao
Just because she says she's a lawyer doesn't mean she's a *good* lawyer, after all. Something to think about since the Depp v Heard trial.
Y'all better watch to the very end. Judge had me weak with that burn at her husband. 🤣
🤣 I love the more personal questions they get so I do stay til the end for it. I especially stayed this time just for you lol. That was a sick burn, he said he'd get her later for that... proof if anything happens 😆
Oh hell yeah! I damn near spit out my tea!! 🤣🤣🤣 But I so love their relationship!!
I don’t get it how is it the defendants fault for the crooked pipes? 💀 they’re literally in the ground that’s how the moved over the 40+ years they’ve been in the ground 😂 like I believe the defendant when he told them that he could fix it but they would have to pay and they were just being cheap I disagree with the verdict on this one
Agree.....I think now that the connector fittings and pipes to connect the new filter and pump are white...it stands out and she is blaming the plumber for pipes that have moved in 40 years underground....Nope ....bad ruling the plumber is not at fault...Judge M got this one wrong...Have a good day....
I too concur. I don't often think she makes the wrong verdict, but when it happens (in my humble opinion) it's so frustrating!
I didn't really see the issue. Put a small lattice fence box around it. Maybe I missed something.
Thats what i have
Judge allowed her OCD to sway her ruling....A buzzing sound nobody can hear..She makes hubby pack up and they move to another hotel or room?....Poor John ....patience of a saint.....
Tell me you're a bad lawyer without telling me...
I struggle with thinking she is a lawyer. She seems not to know law or how to argue well.
All plea bargains
Legal training in the old Soviet Union was nothing like what it is here. They were trained, strictly to support the Communist regime while making it look like they actually cared about justice.
@@nondescriptnyc wait what....? She says she’s a lawyer in New York.
@@nondescriptnyc looks like your comment was deleted
Did not agree at all with this verdict. I don’t believe this messed their entire summer up. They still could use the pool. If the defendant is really at fault it would be for not providing receipts for the extra costs. That amount should have been what was returned to the plaintiffs. Didn’t see how JM got her figures for what was owed since the plaintiff’s didn’t provide another estimate and how did she know if the work was done poorly without another expert opinion. I call bologna on this one. Z
How hard is it for people to create contracts that spell out specifically what a job entails, especially when it comes to home inprovements/repairs? I expected more from a lawyer (plaintiff) and an entrepreneur (defendant).
That's to easy
Where did this lady get her law degree? I think she lied about that. No lawyer would do work without having a contract.
I don’t think the plaintiff if a criminal defense lawyer, or any lawyer judging by the way she handled her case. Definitely a phony bologna.
"...You won the lawsuit, but you're not happy..." Doug's giggle makes it all worthwhile😀
Seems the judge is in error. This lawyer should have a contract as Marilyn usually asks for
The black pipes were run to a specific area. After that you connect the new pipes to them. Add to that IT WORKS. They shouldn’t have gotten anything back.
I couldnt even finish this episode. Im so sick of miserable old people
Welcome back PC family
Have you ever been mistaken for a man? No, have you? 🤣🤣 best lines
After a little digging- Serafima lunin is in fact, not an attorney. She was employed by a law firm- as an office manager. I know that all of you are probably just as ‘shocked’ as I was to find out that little bit of info.. 🙄
🙃🙂🙃🙂🙃
Well sh*t, I worked at a bar association as an administrative assistant, I guess I’m an attorney too! 😂
Is it just me or did the female plaintiff's face scrunch up funny whenever she said "idiot"??? Haha made me chuckle 😆
I would never hire plaintiff
Doug is laughing at EVERYbody today! 😂
Wow judge that was a SAVAGE comment at the end to your husband lol!!!😂
That was the funniest after the verdict 😂😂
Well her Facebook page says she Worked
Boo, the judge took a guess as to what the damages are even though she never saw what the finished job looked like, they dug up the area and then took pictures, how can she possibly know what was or wasn't his fault, especially without an estimate from a different plumber. Shouldn't have rewarded them, besides it looking crooked it was impossible to know the extent of work needed or if he was neglectful in anyway.
she aint no lawyer.
And you ain't no wordsmith
I loved her come back lol 😆 😂 do you ever get mistaken for a man. No do you lol 😆 😂 🤣
Judge J: You have a deep voice, Marilyn; have you ever been mistaken for a man?"
Judge M: No. Have you?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Now *that's a perfect comeback for a couple married forever. I know because I have that kind of marriage and wouldn't let that slip by, either. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Who knew she was a comedian?
Not the 1st time he's mentioned her having a deep voice. Think it may be an issue for him? I don't even think it's that deep. "Ever get mistaken for a man?" "I don't know' have you?" Burn!
I agree with the defendant. I think he offered to fix the pipes but there would be an extra cost to fix what was there and she just did not want to pay anything.
What difference does it make if the pipes are slanted? Ffs... as long as they work!
One of the few times where she required no proof of the agreement. No proof that he screwed up, so he should only owe the extra fees he couldn't provide receipts for
I would have given them $100 back. He obviously purchased some parts.
Exactly what I just wrote in my comment. She just pulled figures from her rear and took the word of the plaintiff’s that the defendants work was done wrong. Not fair at all.
well, the plaintiff is a 'lawyer' its mates rates by the judge
it was a retro fit to an existing pipe system
judge should have required a before picture of how the pipes were attached to the old pump and filter
This ia the most ridiculous case I have seen on here! And they won! WTF???? They shouldn't have gotten anything here. Professional courtesy I auppose.
Nobody took before and after photos? Defendant has no receipts? Old man on the couch couldn't get a word in edgewise?
*♫ Things That Make You Go, Hmm ♫*
Doug throws salt in the wound always lol!!
And you have to pay $400 (chuckles).
Wrong verdict.
The plaintiff is no lawyer and what does that matter.
I fabricate and install aquariums and ponds from scratch for over 30 years....
My business is in Los Angeles.
I have dealt with thousands of outdoor projects relative to the plaintiffs.
The judge surely got this one wrong 100....
The installer is correct by not wanting to move old existing pvc or abs pipe and fittings as they can crack easily when weather worn and pressurized over past years...
I speculate and trust the defendant gave them an option and bid of digging out and re piping almost everything....
This coat was much higher than just the attachments to the new sand filter and pump....
700 bucks is nothing......
He was not lying about the cost of valves and fittings , sand, glue et al.....
Fill that dirt hole and the piping does not look crooked as they made it look much worse by digging down.
The large mistake the defendant made was not giving a clear invoice of the cost of parts used....
Guys like this and in my trade often have spare valves and fittings from years of work laying around and is likely why he has no receipts....
He did not prepare evidence for this case and lost his labor profit..
He should have gone back to check and may have won just on that.....
Lesson to the public out there......
CHEAP IS NOT GOOD!
YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR!.
I would have charged 2 thousand for that job and all would look clean and immaculate with clear glue....
Yes they would have paid 3 x amount however the plumbing would last decades and East to replace pump if needed with union firings to plug and play....
Great service people always think ahead....
CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP.......
That’s what happens when you want the cheapest price !
Judge M’s joke to her husband😂😂😂😂😂 she’s no nonsense
Why wouldn't they box it in with lattice or something else if she was so traumatized?
I disagree with the judge on this one, I 100% believe him when he says he told them that he could replace the Crooked pipes and that they just didn't want to pay to do that, not only that but you can tell by looking at the picture that the bottom black pipes are old they weren't newly installed.
Always have a detailed contract especially when dealing with senior citizens. The fact is at this age they are potentially forgetting 30 percent or more of what happened in a day. Not all seniors but it's just a fact that memory goes for many at this age.
Her husband couldn’t get a word in lol
Why didn’t they just buy a bush. What a goofy case.
Those crooked pipes are perfectly fine... it's a pool filter not a lawn decoration. This lady is just a complainer.
Great come back the judge gave her husband.
She not no damn lawyer 🤣🤣🤣
The plaintiffs got a new pump, filter and connectors for free! That's not rough justice; the defendant got rail roaded.
That lady is not an attorney. 😂
Not a good verdict at all. How many times does the judge say the plaintiff must bring the proof. They did not and the blue collar guy is made to look bad. Apparently in New York the bar exam must be fairly simple. Doesn't she also say when attorney's appear she holds them to a higher standard because they should know better.
What’s makes this a bit different is that the proof are that the pictures do not put the best light on the defendant’s work. It does look sloppy but I 100% believe him when he says that they were already crooked. But he doesn’t have any proof that he told them it would look that way.
@@peezypeeze9140 His work looks fine, he only installed the PVC not the black piping.
@@Channel-JJ Looks can be deceiving. In this case the defendant needed to prove he told the plaintiff they would remain crooked and he couldn’t.
@@peezypeeze9140 why does he need to prove that, he's not the one filling the lawsuit? The standard for a civil trial is the preponderance of the evidence, which means more likely than not. The only evidence is he said she said to me that is a wash. At the end of the day the burden of proof is on the plaintiff and she had none and more should be expected from her if she really is a lawyer which I question.
@@Channel-JJ since the plaintiff had proof of terrible looking pipes, the burden of proof then shifts to the defendant to had evidence and a defense on why those pipes looked like that.
Loonies. Your summer was ruined over a few pipes that are at an angle? Ridiculous. Her back yard is probably not that pristine.
Pipes look fine to me..then again, what did they look like before the job?
I don't think he should have had to pay them back. If the pipes were already sticking out of the ground and he didn't do anything to replace those pipes they knew the pipes were crooked already.
Yeah one of the times I disagree with the judge on her disagreement. Those plaintiffs are just ridiculous. One of the times I'm glad the money doesn't come out of the "loser's" pocket.
How can you be a lawyer in NY but not speak proper English?!
You keep receipts always when in business.
This is the first time I’ve ever fundamentally disagreed with the verdict on The People’s Court. I wholeheartedly believe the plaintiff decided not to pay the expensive job of correcting the old pipes and that’s why she hasn’t gotten an estimate for a repair- she didn’t intend to pay what it costs to do the job she wanted. She just wanted to pay for a bandaid. Thumbs down.
So this ‘lawyer’ says to the Judge when asked for evidence: “Trust me, it’s $300”…… Right.
the judge got this one wrong
the guy did what they asked
and we all know the pipes will never be changed
the 'lawyer' just wanted it free and got it almost free
he got hired to install the motor. only thing he did wrong was overcharge for those pvc fittings.
he ruined their whole summer!
really, a badly installed pool pump ruins your whole summer?
i send him over 100 messages! lol
the husbands having a stroke wanting to say something lol
Could of been fixed w/a cute wooden cover. A lot of people cover the pool systems. Ours was in a small bathroom and changing room.
If she’s a lawyer then I’m a billionaire 🤦🏾♂️
The look on the woman's face when the judge asked why she didn't get it fixed says everything, it works but doesn't look pretty so why get it fixed when you can build a box around it and get a very stupid tv judge to pay her for it!
Can you make the sound clearer?
Its muffled.☺
Naw that’s yoi
@@mdgamble lol
This is the best they can do if they are doing this over zoom etc... Just be happy we have something to watch 😂
Another poor decision from the judge. Those pipes were crooked to begin with. She always says she is from a long list of contractors. I would love to see there work and see it. I wonder if they are perfect. She has it in on cotactors. I think the lawyer just wanted a free job or close to it.
Lol I think the judge kinda got this one wrong
Bad call Milian
Love ❤️ judge milian
I love Judge Milian but she needs to stop using "I have OCD" as a casual term. People are actually suffering with it. Liking things a certain way is much different than a disorder that can ruin your life.
Vasquez - you're just too bad
I find it SO SILLY to get that worked up over some crooked pipes . They should get a Hobby or put some potted plants around it , Calm Down .
Why won't she let the husband talk?
I don't agree with this one.
Jesus, just put up some type of screen/low wall to hide the pipes and pump. They’re ugly as hell anyway, even if the pipes were straight…
lmao @ no, have you??
I'm super early today!😁
I have been seeing these types of comments about JM ALOT lately...its almost like her and JJ almost traded places...I do have to say that JM isn't anywhere as brutal and rude as JJ though...and that is a good thing...lol
Milian certainly does seem like she does have OCD. I knew she had something so I'm happy she finally admitted it. But the job the defendant did was horrible which is why the plantiff recieved some money back.
Pot, meet kettle. 😂😂😂
@@Childfree334 😂😂 I'm dead
No, you are wrong, he had to give back $400 because he couldn't prove with receipts the stuff he had to buy, NOT because he had done a bad job...
Oh Adrian😅
@@Childfree334 I see you..Sunday💙💙💙
I’ve been mistaken for a Man - just by my short GI Jane hair cut. You would think people could see my double D’s wobbling first 😂
just hide the pipes and the ugly pump with a low fence or screen FFS
she is not a lawyer. i'm sorry but i don't see it. and with the way she's speaking says it.
No disrespect but how was she a lawyer when she can barely speak English? I need subtitles to understand her
Judge made up her mind before she ever sat down. Unprofessional to not give equal time for the defendant to defend himself.
This judge man, ha ha remember guys handy men screw the customers charge them the going rates always never do favors every penny the guy being sued never had a chance to pled his case this judge lmao rough justice lmao couldn’t be more right! I guess even lmao, judges have bad days.
I don’t see anything crooked.
What loons.
Judge definitely botched this one. Also if that woman speaks like that and is a practicing lawyer.....yikes
Marilyn got it wrong once again... wow!
Cant stand that old man! Take him off the show