Yeah. Just what you DON'T want. A babysitter who is invested in your kids. The mother was disgusting. The way she spoke to the babysitter was disgusting.
That mother is obviously not a Mother. She got one eye closed during the whole trial. She’s a severe alcoholic and needs help. Even has empty beer boxes in her background during the vid sesh. Fucking crazy world.
Babysitter is a busybody idiot. She’s gonna get sued for flapping her gums and lying about the mother being a bad mom. The babysitter is pathetic.She didn’t care about the kids she cared about the MONEY.
That plaintiff never said anything negative about the husband. So you already know who’s side she’s on. She should mind her own business because she doesn’t know what the heck is going on with that couple.
@@barbarat5729 have you met the father? It’s odd to make this suggestion when you don’t even know the father’s character based on a people’s court segment.
@@johnsullyB exactly like it's annoying how people try to say the mother is a bad parent 😒 we don't even know what's going on with the couple. the babysitter should have mind own her business
I agree, mainly because the mother remained very calm and respectful the entire case. Meanwhile, the babysitter ran the full emotion- spectrum, and not one BIT of it was based on fact or law. 🤦🏾♀️
This sounds like the babysitter wanted to take the mothers place…. She did everything but say “Omg how can you treat such a handsome amazing man like that, he needs a real good mom to his kids like me”. Which doesn’t make the mom a good mom. Of course she should respect the person taking care of her kids… But clearly some professional lines were crossed here where she decided she was a better mom and wife than her…
She can be honest about the kids' mother not being the best mother she could be *without* fangirling over the father and acting like she's his doting mother, the mother-in-law that just despises her trashy daughter-in-law
The mom makes herself look bad so the baby sitter didn't have to do nothing for that. I don't believe this at all, she was lucky to have a baby sitter like this.
The plaintiff is the paid babysitter, NOT the grandmother, she got too involved and got too personal, whether she did or didn't like the mother or father, she was not there to judge, she was there to do a job. And how was quitting her job as the babysitter a good thing for those children, she got just a petty as the parents, well now she won't be seeing those children again...
Maybe it is for the best. The babysitter should not take sides in the parent's divorce. Her job was to only watch the children and provide a safe environment.
When you spend all those hours, years,caring for children. You get emotionally involved. It doesn't matter if she was being paid, child care workers spend more waking hour time with the kids than parents or grandparents do. (Most Grandparents do not see them daily for 8+ hours a day.
That old lady is going to cause trouble with DHS. I can see it coming. Mother beware and any parent that takes their kids to her. She comes with a big question mark.
So she put up with that b**** drama for nothing she kept good care of them boys all them years to get stiff for money hey what you all ain't nobody watching nobody gives for free I'm a cripple Grandmama and I charge my daughter to watch her baby I sure do not 30 bucks a day but I still charger something
I am surprised that the older women is trying to act all "sweet old lady", then pops off in the text like a trucker. IT is very stressful to raise kids with a full time job and putting them in daycare when you would rather be home with them. I'm not surprised by the younger women snapping. But I'm not falling for that old lady trying to act all sweet. I believe she was an old busy body, and not just watching the kids and minding her business.
She had the hots for the husband and is bitter about the divorce and him moving away. There's nothing sweet about her. She's just an old hag who was fantasizing that they were her kids.
Did plaintiff just admit to getting on the show for defaming the mom? She told the lady, "Don't come back.." which means "quit," and never collected late fees. Good luck to those kids!
I have known a few “bad story tellers” like the plaintiff. They would, for one, use lots of pronouns w/o first establishing who is who, in relation to whom. Also, they’d start spewing out specifics w/o first setting up the big picture or vice versa (too much general info w/o the specifics).
Context: she was already emotional. Then nervous being on camera, of famous show. Mainly, she really cares about those children and the stress of the nasty behavior and aggression from the parental unit? Overwhelmed her completely. 😢
That mother is manipulative and totally played her. Many parents like her stiff their daycare provider. That's why now it's so expensive and why they WILL NOT ever give anyone a break or give time to pay any fees. At the same time, the provider should've kept if professional. Even if she thought certain things. She should've kept it to herself. Keep in mind, there's a reason the mother had a restraining order. That gives a hint to her character.
How could she stiff her if it was obvious via text that the babysitter quit. Also, as the judge said months had went by that the babysitter never billed and enforced the late fee. You can’t enforce a late fee later in the future when the relationship goes sour.
@@karenneill9109 Years ago one of my daughter in laws owned a daycare. In 5 yrs, she had 1 noticeably troubled child. All the issues came from the parents. Always chatting her up about the other parent. Always dragging the daycare into their business. The worse part of the job.
That's pretty much what I just typed. Maybe the husband wanted to use this as fuel for when they go to family court. The plaintiff is clearly in cahoots with him.
Obviously this caretaker had more information about this mom than what was said. Her kids are not a priority to her whatsoever. To not pay a daycare person is just wrong
@@esharenee4186 you sound crazy! She got in their marriage and chose to side with the father! She was not a bad mother!The baby sitter didn’t like her from jump before the mom was in her presence! The lady was trying to those kids mother and she is not! The lady couldn’t even give a good enough reason why the mom was bad! The mom should’ve just fire her in the beginning instead of allowing the babysitter to get to her!
The babysitter is acting like those are her kids. Yeah it sucks because you can tell she cares about them but they have a mom and dad. Wanting to bring this to tv to embarrass and expose their nasty divorce is selfish bc the kids will grow up and one day could watch this
It's pretty clear right from the start that the babysitter has issues - it's a bit strange how she is just determined to constantly attack the plaintiff's personality -- they have a business arrangement, nothing more. I wonder if the babysitter has the hots for the (now ex) husband?
@@chelseamonet5432 Not all of the time, sometimes Cps will remove children for much of nothing. There are thousands of horror stories about children being removed from the biological for minor reason or miscommunication and going through hell, they are meant to help and protect children but they are not always for the better. I think the Plaintiff is to invested in these peoples personal life and is painting the defendant as a terrible mother while singing praise to the father.
@@chelseamonet5432 dr phil always tell people not to get CPS involved because it might do more damage than good... and cases like this have 2 sides... that old Lady seems to favor the "father" for some reason....
The people in this comments section (especially most of the men thus far) remind me that being single isn't too bad- if there are men like them that I have as "options". Rather be single than to be belittled, hit on, and everything else under the book. So judgemental for men who's only companion is probably their hand 🙃just saying 😒 Anyways Milian is right. If you haven't been sticking to the contract, and abiding by the rules- then you can't suddenly decide to enforce it when you get mad. It's no longer applicable since the contract was broken. Be stern or move on. End of story. Both of them lack professionalism and basic courtesy however.
Not to be "that guy"......but it's either 'everything under THE SUN' or 'everything in the book'. Unless it's a leap year. And an election year. And you're on vacation. On a beach. Reading a book. Under the sun. Then all bets are off!!!
@@thelimey351 My exe loves me and so does every man who knows me. We would still be together had we not been super busy. The comments from the men under this comments section, however, were extremely demeaning and misogynistic. But I do agree- I am better off single than to be stuck with anyone who thinks so little of women as to base her merely off of having colored hair.
I HATE when kids have to live in dysfunction!! I’m an adult and don’t want to be around constant bickering and fighting. Kids should not have to deal with that crap.. This will NOT be my child’s experience.
Sounds like the plaintiff might have gotten paid by the ex husband to do this for some kind of proof in family court by what she had said in the wrap up. She wasn't interested in the money, she wanted it known that the woman is a "bad mother".
I was home for 1year for each of our 4 kids could have stayed for 18 months ,also gave me a break fom the hospital seeing soo much and injury and pain .But i also miss my patients and coworkers a year was ok for me
The sitter needs to mind her business just do her job and never make any changes in the contract without having anything in writing. It seems like she’s judgmental towards other women lol
I was on the Plaintiff's side up until the text messages came to light- if anyone who works for me spoke to me via text the way the Plaintiff did (and I'm not saying the Defendant is innocent, either, but she's the "employer') I would fire her immediately. If she speaks that way to me- how does she speak to the kids?
The first thing this is so called day care worker crossed way too many boundaries and got into these people's business you're there to work not to get personal now if they owe you money that's it,They are not your children so keep your opinions to your self. The plaintiff is a busy body.
You two are the best love the question time added to your channel..just fantastic to see you in a relaxed conversation...keep on getting the truth ...your my hope 💜with of course judge Judy 🧡
@@christophermanzanares1043 Wow sounds like you should perhaps go on your search for hope and maybe not be so bitter toward someone just expressing their positivity.
That babysitter has no boundaries. Those kids will never remember that women. Which is a good thing considering how horrible she was to their mother. She even wanted to embarrass her on national TV.
I agree with the Babysitter. She cares more than the Mother, who is a an spoiled brat. The children at least had four years of living care and no drama. When you get our age.....you refuse to put up with BS. The truth matters.
Was the Plantiff about to explain that the reason she's collecting now is because so many people watch the show and it's good marketing for her? She started to talk and was cut off. Can't imagine someone finding their next babysitter on the Peoples Court.
I think the plaintiff was trying to say that even if she lost at least she put it out there that the defendant is a “bad mom/person” that’s the vibe I get from the plaintiff.
This woman should not watch kids she was too personally involved in this woman family, also this woman care for the kids, that is those kids mother, enough said.
The plaintiff is really weird, she’s clearly getting fed information from the dad And she has a vendetta against the mom. If I was the mom I wouldn’t want my babysitter to be involved in my divorce and spreading rumors about me. That’s too far
If your not going to be greatful to your babysitters they won't keep you on as a client, I think people forget how hard it is to find a trustworthy, patient, clean, active, and loving babysitter.
@@evawinemiller7087 she was to involved to much in the their relationship! The babysitter is pure evil saying she brought her to court to so called exposed her! The old lady is nasty! We didn't get the defendant side of the story of if she miss treated her kids!
She was rude and completely disrespectful! The mother had no right to disrespect her. She knows darn well she owed her. This women watches your kids and you talk like that?! I would never.
I would never sign a contract that penalizes like that if I had kids and worked. that's a recipe for disaster. nothing goes to plan with time if you have kids
Good luck finding any reputable daycare without those terms. If you want flexibility then you need to work with private babysitters or nannies who agree to some degree of flexibility with hours.
It's too bad that you cannot predict beforehand what life will be like if you have kids with a particular person. This is why everyone should do their due diligence to find out if this is the right person before deciding to get involved with someone. This defendant is in this circumstance because she picked the wrong man to get with.
@@adrianprince7266 Yea, it says the man is a deadbeat father who should never see his kids again for being a violent man. But I guess in the eyes of Adrian, guys are always innocent against the evils of women.
Your first sentence is great and you should have stopped there lol. Relationships are beautifully and excitingly unpredictable. We don't know from a 15 minute video, that didn't even involve the father, what happened. You do what you're comfortable with, but don't assume you know the consequences of not doing things your way
At the end of the day , the babysitter should have stayed out their business! Keep your feelings to yourself! Also , the mother need to learn how to be appreciative of ppl that’s helping her! I understand she should’ve mind her business but you do not disrespect your elders! I don’t care what the babysitter did ! You do not disrespect her !
I pray for this woman who is taking care of sick grandfather taking care of two tinder age children all the stress and hater and nasty daughter in law and son gets everything she asked for because that what ever you call her bless this woman and not the nasty whatever
Yes but both of them was bad! You don’t disrespect elders but also the babysitter stayed in their business and didn’t like the mom bc of her teaming up with the ex husband! She didn’t like her since day one . I feel like she should’ve never even got in their business or put her two senses in . Keep it professional with both!
@@LoveHeatherHeadly I don't agree with the respect your elders BS, I don't care how old you are. If you are a 30 year old or even a 90 year old and you are disrespectful to me, I will be disrespectful right back. I'll treat you the exact same way you treat me, no matter what your age is.
Older lady is out of line. Daycare's or schools don't have a late fee for too late pick up. They ring the parent, a backup person or the police if a parent has a no show. She is clutching at being on tv. As for the mother, she is disrespectful and sounds a little drug affected and slow. She needs to watch her back. Baby sitter woman wants public revenge. I'm not sure what Child Services is called in the States but I would be expecting a visit from them if I was that mum.
few people are talking about the mother's hair color and I don't really know if she's a good mother or not but I don't think hair color has anything to do with being a mother. im sorry people but you're gonna see a lot of rainbow looking PARENTS in younger generations 😂
Everyone saying the baby sitter got too involved not at all. Y’all better stop this all moms are perfect crap some of these kids cry out for help cause they have terrible mothers. Just like the baby sitter who had to testify when that man ended up killing all 5 of his kids. If you don’t wanna baby sitter that cares watch them yourself
No one ever onows what happens in a relationship behind closed doors. But obviously the dad would tell the babysitter his side and the mother would tell her side, the babysitter can see the change in attitude in kids when something was wrong. The sitter was put in the middle. But the babysitter had been in the kids life since birth to 4 years old. I dont doubt she lives the kids but she definitely should have tried to stay out their marriage fights. One parent or both will attempt to dtag the babysitter to their side in court.
The plaintiff lost the case when she mispronounced Judge Milian's last name twice, I don't understand why so many people come on here and do that,( pronouncing her last name is just not that difficult) even though she told her it was no big deal, to mispronounce someone's name represents disrespect, and you most certainly don't do it if that person happens to be the Judge 💯
@Dwahn Denson, the plaintiff lost cause she owed the care worker. When you do not pay your bills, you pay more in the end. Had nothing to do with the Judge's name. So funny you are about a tint issue that had nothing to do with the case.
During the testimony when the plaintiff repeatedly forgave the late fees I thought of the principles of gratuitous promise and equitable estoppel, and JM mentioned the principle of waiver. Is this the US version of those principles? (Not a lawyer or law student, I’ve just read a bit about Canadian contract law)
Completely different concepts: Gratuitous promise: a promise to give something in the future without requiring any consideration in exchange. Generally, if it created a reliance, it is enforceable as a quasi-contract. Not relevant here because there is an actual contract and an exchange of consideration ($) for a service. Equitable Estoppel: A remedy the law provides where there is no written remedy available. It is designed to make one whole, and is not always financial. It is also a quasi-contract concept and not relevant here because the actual remedy is written right into the existing contract. Waiver: A remedy or defined consideration is written into a contract but, with apparent consent of both parties (or at least with the consent of the party who benefits from the clause) that portion of the contract routinely is not enforced. Relevant here because there is an actual contract with an actual penalty clause, but the babysitter (the one who gets the benefit of the clause) routinely "waived" (ie: didn't require payment of) the penalty. Hope that helps. Btw: if you are really interested in learning these types of terms, I highly recommend a copy of Black's law dictionary. I've been practicing law almost 20 years and don't think I've actively used it for the last 10, but it is one of the few books that has never been out of easy reach since law school. Perhaps earlier. Every term the Judge uses on this show is easily found in those precious pages :).
only thing wrong with the plaintiff is that she got to emotional connected. that will never work as a paid baby sitter. You are there to monitor the children. nothing else and specifically no siding with any of the adults.
The sitter obviously does not watch the peoples court otherwise she would be able to pronounce the judges name. The judge even corrected her during the case, and yet in the after case commentary she mispronounced it again
Why doesn’t YT have an edit option? It’s so annoying lol The plaintiff is CRAZY. Plaintiff needed to mind her business.Busybody plaintiff doesn’t impress me one bit. I would never allow this woman near kids.She had no business meddling in THEIR business.
The babysitter is too invested and clearly has the dad on speed-dial. The mom better be very careful!
Yeah. Just what you DON'T want. A babysitter who is invested in your kids.
The mother was disgusting. The way she spoke to the babysitter was disgusting.
@@barbarat5729 in her personal life Barbara! No need for the CAPS! go get a journal and write out your frustration, don’t write it to me.
The Mother better treat her future babysitter's with a bit more kindness. She was lucky to have the same babysitter for 4 year's.
That mother is obviously not a Mother. She got one eye closed during the whole trial. She’s a severe alcoholic and needs help. Even has empty beer boxes in her background during the vid sesh. Fucking crazy world.
She should know better than to take either parent’s side. That daycare provider is nasty and vindictive.
The babysitter has horrible boundaries…
Babysitter is a busybody idiot. She’s gonna get sued for flapping her gums and lying about the mother being a bad mom. The babysitter is pathetic.She didn’t care about the kids she cared about the MONEY.
That plaintiff never said anything negative about the husband. So you already know who’s side she’s on. She should mind her own business because she doesn’t know what the heck is going on with that couple.
Maybe the kids would just be better off with their father.
@@barbarat5729 have you met the father? It’s odd to make this suggestion when you don’t even know the father’s character based on a people’s court segment.
She actually did bash both. Go back and listen when she said they BOTH didn't treat the kids like they are humans.
@@johnsullyB exactly like it's annoying how people try to say the mother is a bad parent 😒 we don't even know what's going on with the couple. the babysitter should have mind own her business
I agree, mainly because the mother remained very calm and respectful the entire case. Meanwhile, the babysitter ran the full emotion- spectrum, and not one BIT of it was based on fact or law. 🤦🏾♀️
This sounds like the babysitter wanted to take the mothers place…. She did everything but say “Omg how can you treat such a handsome amazing man like that, he needs a real good mom to his kids like me”.
Which doesn’t make the mom a good mom. Of course she should respect the person taking care of her kids…
But clearly some professional lines were crossed here where she decided she was a better mom and wife than her…
She can be honest about the kids' mother not being the best mother she could be *without* fangirling over the father and acting like she's his doting mother, the mother-in-law that just despises her trashy daughter-in-law
The mom makes herself look bad so the baby sitter didn't have to do nothing for that. I don't believe this at all, she was lucky to have a baby sitter like this.
@@brandonwarchol2083 don't let the bullshit plea fool ya buddy. There's a LOT more to the story.
The plaintiff is the paid babysitter, NOT the grandmother, she got too involved and got too personal, whether she did or didn't like the mother or father, she was not there to judge, she was there to do a job. And how was quitting her job as the babysitter a good thing for those children, she got just a petty as the parents, well now she won't be seeing those children again...
Maybe it is for the best. The babysitter should not take sides in the parent's divorce. Her job was to only watch the children and provide a safe environment.
This Woman is a Hero.
Those kids don't stand a chance with a mother like that.
When you love the children you're caring for, sometimes you can't help but get emotionally involved
@@moniqueengleman873 you clearly haven't a clue. Plaintiff was being spoon fed bullshit.
When you spend all those hours, years,caring for children. You get emotionally involved. It doesn't matter if she was being paid, child care workers spend more waking hour time with the kids than parents or grandparents do. (Most Grandparents do not see them daily for 8+ hours a day.
That old lady is going to cause trouble with DHS. I can see it coming. Mother beware and any parent that takes their kids to her. She comes with a big question mark.
@Tiger Bandaid what makes you assume the dad (who you have not met or seen) is an upstanding person?
So she put up with that b**** drama for nothing she kept good care of them boys all them years to get stiff for money hey what you all ain't nobody watching nobody gives for free I'm a cripple Grandmama and I charge my daughter to watch her baby I sure do not 30 bucks a day but I still charger something
The hag will get sued by the Mother.
The plaintiff was not producing any tears while she was "crying".
🐊 💦
Lol. It’s not like was an Amber Heard level demonstration inclusive of big sniffs and fake wiping of fake tears
It was fake lol
Plaintiff is a pathetic busybody clown.
Does she not know how hard it is to find a daycare provider who actually loves your kids?
🤔
does she care?
If she cared she wouldn’t drop them without notice, because she’s mad at the mom. That hurts the kids too.
Girl bye
I am surprised that the older women is trying to act all "sweet old lady", then pops off in the text like a trucker. IT is very stressful to raise kids with a full time job and putting them in daycare when you would rather be home with them. I'm not surprised by the younger women snapping. But I'm not falling for that old lady trying to act all sweet. I believe she was an old busy body, and not just watching the kids and minding her business.
How is she acting sweet? She says right away that she called the mother bat shit crazy to her face as part of her initial testimony. 🤔
She could of learned how to do her eyebrows instead of wondering what’s going on in her clients life’s.
She had the hots for the husband and is bitter about the divorce and him moving away. There's nothing sweet about her. She's just an old hag who was fantasizing that they were her kids.
@@Britty0189 😂🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
@@Britty0189 someone should pin 📌 your reply……..lol 🤣
Did plaintiff just admit to getting on the show for defaming the mom? She told the lady, "Don't come back.." which means "quit," and never collected late fees. Good luck to those kids!
The plaintiff does not know how to begin a story. I was confused right off the bat
Yes, me too!!
I have known a few “bad story tellers” like the plaintiff. They would, for one, use lots of pronouns w/o first establishing who is who, in relation to whom. Also, they’d start spewing out specifics w/o first setting up the big picture or vice versa (too much general info w/o the specifics).
This comment had me laughing for 5 minutes 😂😂😂 I thought it was just me
Context: she was already emotional. Then nervous being on camera, of famous show. Mainly, she really cares about those children and the stress of the nasty behavior and aggression from the parental unit? Overwhelmed her completely. 😢
@@nondescriptnyc get what you're saying 👍 but perhaps it's nerves or ADD.
When the Plaintiff says Judge MY-LEE-ON it gets me everytime lol
I was waiting for Doug to correct her 😂
That mother is manipulative and totally played her. Many parents like her stiff their daycare provider. That's why now it's so expensive and why they WILL NOT ever give anyone a break or give time to pay any fees. At the same time, the provider should've kept if professional. Even if she thought certain things. She should've kept it to herself. Keep in mind, there's a reason the mother had a restraining order. That gives a hint to her character.
How could she stiff her if it was obvious via text that the babysitter quit. Also, as the judge said months had went by that the babysitter never billed and enforced the late fee. You can’t enforce a late fee later in the future when the relationship goes sour.
LMFAO. If only you knew the truth about the babysitter. Meddlesome, manipulative and so much as harassed her at work through other employees.
She manipulated her into quitting??
That is why I stopped babysitting
@Eyeofthemourning WRONG! You are describing yourself.
I can attest to Mother's/Father's putting their babysitter in the middle of their marital fights. It comes up in Family Court all the time.
Daycare providers have to be very careful to avoid that. It’s destructive for all involved.
@@karenneill9109 Years ago one of my daughter in laws owned a daycare. In 5 yrs, she had 1 noticeably troubled child. All the issues came from the parents. Always chatting her up about the other parent. Always dragging the daycare into their business. The worse part of the job.
It should come up in family court.
Both should pay half.
@@wontsufferfools9332 Not for payments, parents often drag daycare personel to testify in custody hearings.
That's pretty much what I just typed. Maybe the husband wanted to use this as fuel for when they go to family court. The plaintiff is clearly in cahoots with him.
Why are people calling her a bad mother? Nothing said made her a bad mother, she was in a bad marriage, not the same.
Obviously this caretaker had more information about this mom than what was said. Her kids are not a priority to her whatsoever. To not pay a daycare person is just wrong
@@mudderjen
What she won?! She WAS right!
Daycare workers are trained to know. I just hope that they take it seriously and report the signs instead of waiting til serious things happen.
@@esharenee4186 I didn’t hear her say ONE thing that made her a bad mother not ONE.
@@esharenee4186 you sound crazy! She got in their marriage and chose to side with the father! She was not a bad mother!The baby sitter didn’t like her from jump before the mom was in her presence! The lady was trying to those kids mother and she is not! The lady couldn’t even give a good enough reason why the mom was bad! The mom should’ve just fire her in the beginning instead of allowing the babysitter to get to her!
Its funny how many ppl on here are commenting on the defendants hair color 😂 what does her hair color have to do with anything ? Yall triggered ?😂😂😂
The babysitter is acting like those are her kids. Yeah it sucks because you can tell she cares about them but they have a mom and dad. Wanting to bring this to tv to embarrass and expose their nasty divorce is selfish bc the kids will grow up and one day could watch this
It's pretty clear right from the start that the babysitter has issues - it's a bit strange how she is just determined to constantly attack the plaintiff's personality -- they have a business arrangement, nothing more. I wonder if the babysitter has the hots for the (now ex) husband?
ewwww she's an old woman, ewwww
You made sense up until the last sentence! 🥴
i agree but it kinda seems like the couple made her involved though i do think she should have just taken the initiative to remove herself
Your thought is not without merit. I know all parties involved.
@@marthaduran6010 lol yeah! I meant the other person's ex.... oof.
That lady tried to play sweeet and innocent until she got caught with the stfup lol
I had to rewind this a few times because it was a bit confused and I'm very good at dissecting a story.
Every time I hear irregardless...I can't...
i love her hair so much love😍
I was thinking the same thing 😊
So she is a disfunctional "mother" - but you love her hair - wow.
@@frankgiuliano380 I didn’t watch the case 🥴
Yes n her makeup 😍
@@frankgiuliano380 Relax Frank liking the color of someone’s hair has NOTHING to do with her behaviors... geez chill
That nosey old woman is way out of line, she seems like the type of person that would sneak and call Child Protective Services on your azz , SMH 💯
If they feel a need to call CPS, isn’t that a good thing? If CPS deems nothing is wrong, they will flag the reporter.
@@chelseamonet5432 Not all of the time, sometimes Cps will remove children for much of nothing. There are thousands of horror stories about children being removed from the biological for minor reason or miscommunication and going through hell, they are meant to help and protect children but they are not always for the better. I think the Plaintiff is to invested in these peoples personal life and is painting the defendant as a terrible mother while singing praise to the father.
@@chelseamonet5432 dr phil always tell people not to get CPS involved because it might do more damage than good...
and cases like this have 2 sides...
that old Lady seems to favor the "father" for some reason....
I love the defendant hair!
Holy shit, she wouldn't be within a mile of my kid. She is absolutely not wrapped tight.
The people in this comments section (especially most of the men thus far) remind me that being single isn't too bad- if there are men like them that I have as "options". Rather be single than to be belittled, hit on, and everything else under the book. So judgemental for men who's only companion is probably their hand 🙃just saying 😒
Anyways Milian is right. If you haven't been sticking to the contract, and abiding by the rules- then you can't suddenly decide to enforce it when you get mad. It's no longer applicable since the contract was broken. Be stern or move on. End of story. Both of them lack professionalism and basic courtesy however.
Not to be "that guy"......but it's either 'everything under THE SUN' or 'everything in the book'.
Unless it's a leap year. And an election year. And you're on vacation. On a beach. Reading a book. Under the sun. Then all bets are off!!!
@@pivotal1883 I couldn't remember the phrase, so I improvised. I do it a lot, since I have a memory impair when it comes to words 🙃🤷🏾♀️
@@naiadolling I think from all sides you're right, you sound better off single - it's a win-win for you & all men...
@@thelimey351 My exe loves me and so does every man who knows me. We would still be together had we not been super busy.
The comments from the men under this comments section, however, were extremely demeaning and misogynistic. But I do agree- I am better off single than to be stuck with anyone who thinks so little of women as to base her merely off of having colored hair.
@@naiadolling " _We would still be together had we not been super busy._ "
I see.
I HATE when kids have to live in dysfunction!! I’m an adult and don’t want to be around constant bickering and fighting. Kids should not have to deal with that crap.. This will NOT be my child’s experience.
Sounds like the plaintiff might have gotten paid by the ex husband to do this for some kind of proof in family court by what she had said in the wrap up. She wasn't interested in the money, she wanted it known that the woman is a "bad mother".
Her mat leave ended when her baby was only 5-6 weeks old? 🥺 my mat leave ends when my baby will be 3 months old and I thought that was too young!!
I was home for 1year for each of our 4 kids could have stayed for 18 months ,also gave me a break fom the hospital seeing soo much and injury and pain .But i also miss my patients and coworkers a year was ok for me
yay for you and whomever your mother works for. thats not the case in some areas, especially in the usa.
Mine ended at 6 weeks it was too early so I quit
As did I, but some of these jobs people have are lucky to get 5 or 6 weeks it stinks
Plaintiff was just a babysitter and wanted to get up in people's business.
Exactly 💯💯💯💯
Plaintiff had an issue with the defendant for some reason from the get go it seems like .
The sitter needs to mind her business just do her job and never make any changes in the contract without having anything in writing. It seems like she’s judgmental towards other women lol
This lady P stuck her nose too far n deep in a customers personal life Do your job you get paid to do..SMH
I was on the Plaintiff's side up until the text messages came to light- if anyone who works for me spoke to me via text the way the Plaintiff did (and I'm not saying the Defendant is innocent, either, but she's the "employer') I would fire her immediately. If she speaks that way to me- how does she speak to the kids?
I was on the defendant side from the beginning.
Like how can you treat the Mother of the children you love like that WTF
Yeah you not watching my kids evaaaaaaa!
Being late for anything is disrespectful of the other persons time.
It happens… tis’ life
its just a few min.
get over it.
The first thing this is so called day care worker crossed way too many boundaries and got into these people's business you're there to work not to get personal now if they owe you money that's it,They are not your children so keep your opinions to your self. The plaintiff is a busy body.
That's exactly what im thinking like if the kids not in any danger stay out of people business
@@lashundavis156 truth
if she was a "busy" body wouldn't she be thinner 😉
Exactly
@@Channel-JJ dont fatshame people...
her Weight doesnt have anything to do with being a busy-body....
her attitude does.
The babysitter should have been dismissed the second she took the side of one parent over the other
I think the sitter wanted the hubby! She looks like the type.
You two are the best love the question time added to your channel..just fantastic to see you in a relaxed conversation...keep on getting the truth ...your my hope 💜with of course judge Judy 🧡
Thats crazy your hope is 2 celebrity judges, kinda sad actually. Hope u find hope with in one day.
@@christophermanzanares1043 Wow sounds like you should perhaps go on your search for hope and maybe not be so bitter toward someone just expressing their positivity.
That babysitter has no boundaries. Those kids will never remember that women. Which is a good thing considering how horrible she was to their mother. She even wanted to embarrass her on national TV.
Hahaha at the end of husband and wife interaction
They're so lucky to both be in the same profession 😆
They are all nuts. Hope the kids are doing well.
WOW. The freaking baseballs on that plaintiff! Try pulling that garbage at a daycare…
I agree with the Babysitter. She cares more than the Mother, who is a an spoiled brat. The children at least had four years of living care and no drama.
When you get our age.....you refuse to put up with BS. The truth matters.
and you know this because you saw a 20 min. court case on tv?????
unbelieveble how judgemental some people are...
I believe the mom is a crappy mom, I also believe the babysitter is too involved.
Was the Plantiff about to explain that the reason she's collecting now is because so many people watch the show and it's good marketing for her? She started to talk and was cut off. Can't imagine someone finding their next babysitter on the Peoples Court.
I know right that's for the People's Court spin off - The Pamper's Court
I actually found my urologist from a Peoples Court referral
@@yastepdaddy 😳🤣
I think the plaintiff was trying to say that even if she lost at least she put it out there that the defendant is a “bad mom/person” that’s the vibe I get from the plaintiff.
@@angelapittman2620 exactly...........I'm thinking hubby might be using this in family court down the line and she was happy to oblige him.
Wishing the best to the kids and mom.
This woman should not watch kids she was too personally involved in this woman family, also this woman care for the kids, that is those kids mother, enough said.
The plaintiff is really weird, she’s clearly getting fed information from the dad And she has a vendetta against the mom. If I was the mom I wouldn’t want my babysitter to be involved in my divorce and spreading rumors about me. That’s too far
You are 100% correct.
First time I have seen a defendant's hair match her outfit.
If your not going to be greatful to your babysitters they won't keep you on as a client, I think people forget how hard it is to find a trustworthy, patient, clean, active, and loving babysitter.
Lady are you the babysitter or other woman?
They’re so precious ❤
Judge Milian, I luv ur justice❤
I wouldn’t let her watch my kids.
She was good with the kids. I don’t trust the lady with the kids she is very evil.
@@evawinemiller7087 she was to involved to much in the their relationship! The babysitter is pure evil saying she brought her to court to so called exposed her! The old lady is nasty! We didn't get the defendant side of the story of if she miss treated her kids!
When i see that purple hair matching the shirt, i run for the hills.
pink,purple...and she looks great...
She was rude and completely disrespectful! The mother had no right to disrespect her. She knows darn well she owed her. This women watches your kids and you talk like that?! I would never.
Roseanne Barr is running a daycare. What could go wrong?
🤔🙄🙄🙄🙄😀😀
I would never sign a contract that penalizes like that if I had kids and worked. that's a recipe for disaster. nothing goes to plan with time if you have kids
Good luck finding any reputable daycare without those terms. If you want flexibility then you need to work with private babysitters or nannies who agree to some degree of flexibility with hours.
Every 15min wow
It's too bad that you cannot predict beforehand what life will be like if you have kids with a particular person. This is why everyone should do their due diligence to find out if this is the right person before deciding to get involved with someone. This defendant is in this circumstance because she picked the wrong man to get with.
So the fault is on the woman for picking a shitty man, and there's absolutely no fault on the man for being shitty?
The defendant is sitting here in court, not her ex, the father of her two children. I believe that alone says enough.
@@adrianprince7266 Yea, it says the man is a deadbeat father who should never see his kids again for being a violent man. But I guess in the eyes of Adrian, guys are always innocent against the evils of women.
Your first sentence is great and you should have stopped there lol. Relationships are beautifully and excitingly unpredictable. We don't know from a 15 minute video, that didn't even involve the father, what happened. You do what you're comfortable with, but don't assume you know the consequences of not doing things your way
@@adrianprince7266 Yeah and the defendant won the case lol you're just taking from this what you want to
If you watched as often as you claim, you would be able to correctly pronounce the judge's name.
call me a fool. but I would never disrespect the person who has my children in their care.
Painful case. If nothing else God bless the children.
Judge My-Leon.
😂
Milian😂😂😂and she said it wrong again lol
Who’s calling who ugly-You own a mirror mom?
At the end of the day , the babysitter should have stayed out their business! Keep your feelings to yourself! Also , the mother need to learn how to be appreciative of ppl that’s helping her! I understand she should’ve mind her business but you do not disrespect your elders! I don’t care what the babysitter did ! You do not disrespect her !
why do parents feel childcare isn't a business.
Right.
I pray for this woman who is taking care of sick grandfather taking care of two tinder age children all the stress and hater and nasty daughter in law and son gets everything she asked for because that what ever you call her bless this woman and not the nasty whatever
Sick person was her husband, not grandfather. Clearly you didn't pay attention. There's no relation between all of them.
The babysitter is way to invested and involved. She needs to not cross the line
They look like mother and daughter.
The defendant is just vile
I can't believe she dealt with that mom as long as she did. Her behavior is despicable
I agree with you.
Yes but both of them was bad! You don’t disrespect elders but also the babysitter stayed in their business and didn’t like the mom bc of her teaming up with the ex husband! She didn’t like her since day one . I feel like she should’ve never even got in their business or put her two senses in . Keep it professional with both!
@@LoveHeatherHeadly I don't agree with the respect your elders BS, I don't care how old you are. If you are a 30 year old or even a 90 year old and you are disrespectful to me, I will be disrespectful right back. I'll treat you the exact same way you treat me, no matter what your age is.
They’re both ridiculous
3 words.
O.M.G.
The innocent children are always the ones to suffer.
Defendant was hittin' it with someone else....that's why she late!!!
Even after being corrected she couldn’t say Judge Milian’s name right…🤦🏻♀️
Judge my-le-on hahaha
Older lady is out of line. Daycare's or schools don't have a late fee for too late pick up. They ring the parent, a backup person or the police if a parent has a no show.
She is clutching at being on tv.
As for the mother, she is disrespectful and sounds a little drug affected and slow.
She needs to watch her back.
Baby sitter woman wants public revenge. I'm not sure what Child Services is called in the States but I would be expecting a visit from them if I was that mum.
The plaintiff is clearly too much involved
few people are talking about the mother's hair color and I don't really know if she's a good mother or not but I don't think hair color has anything to do with being a mother. im sorry people but you're gonna see a lot of rainbow looking PARENTS in younger generations 😂
No one is complaining about Hair Color. Are you that bored here to complain about no one complaining about hair color. PSH.
@@trekgirl65 maybe you should open your eyes wide and search for comments better it's not my fault you're arriving 3 days later for this video 👀
@@trekgirl65 i have seen lots off rude comments about her hair collor already...
now we know why the husband left that thing
some are ugly on the inside others on the outside
this mother won the lottery shes both!
I don't have time to watch this . They said I have to ask my dr. about Kisgualy ! Brb
Everyone saying the baby sitter got too involved not at all. Y’all better stop this all moms are perfect crap some of these kids cry out for help cause they have terrible mothers. Just like the baby sitter who had to testify when that man ended up killing all 5 of his kids. If you don’t wanna baby sitter that cares watch them yourself
She was so involved bcs the defendant allows her to be so involved, she got something out of it.
Both the plaintiff and the defendant engaged in trash behavior.
No one ever onows what happens in a relationship behind closed doors. But obviously the dad would tell the babysitter his side and the mother would tell her side, the babysitter can see the change in attitude in kids when something was wrong. The sitter was put in the middle. But the babysitter had been in the kids life since birth to 4 years old. I dont doubt she lives the kids but she definitely should have tried to stay out their marriage fights. One parent or both will attempt to dtag the babysitter to their side in court.
The mom sent some really nasty stuff. The babysitter was all about the drama tho.
Really, Are you kidding me? What a sh*t show. Those poor kids are the ones who suffered. This borders on child abuse.
The purple hair says it all...
sinds when does an haircollor say anything about the way sombody is?????
The plaintiff started the case all wrong airing out irrelevant information.
The plaintiff lost the case when she mispronounced Judge Milian's last name twice, I don't understand why so many people come on here and do that,( pronouncing her last name is just not that difficult) even though she told her it was no big deal, to mispronounce someone's name represents disrespect, and you most certainly don't do it if that person happens to be the Judge 💯
I know right, that's why CEO Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious is always firing people
That doesn’t make sense. The verdict is the only possible answer
@Dwahn Denson, the plaintiff lost cause she owed the care worker. When you do not pay your bills, you pay more in the end. Had nothing to do with the Judge's name. So funny you are about a tint issue that had nothing to do with the case.
During the testimony when the plaintiff repeatedly forgave the late fees I thought of the principles of gratuitous promise and equitable estoppel, and JM mentioned the principle of waiver. Is this the US version of those principles? (Not a lawyer or law student, I’ve just read a bit about Canadian contract law)
Completely different concepts:
Gratuitous promise: a promise to give something in the future without requiring any consideration in exchange. Generally, if it created a reliance, it is enforceable as a quasi-contract. Not relevant here because there is an actual contract and an exchange of consideration ($) for a service.
Equitable Estoppel: A remedy the law provides where there is no written remedy available. It is designed to make one whole, and is not always financial. It is also a quasi-contract concept and not relevant here because the actual remedy is written right into the existing contract.
Waiver: A remedy or defined consideration is written into a contract but, with apparent consent of both parties (or at least with the consent of the party who benefits from the clause) that portion of the contract routinely is not enforced. Relevant here because there is an actual contract with an actual penalty clause, but the babysitter (the one who gets the benefit of the clause) routinely "waived" (ie: didn't require payment of) the penalty.
Hope that helps.
Btw: if you are really interested in learning these types of terms, I highly recommend a copy of Black's law dictionary. I've been practicing law almost 20 years and don't think I've actively used it for the last 10, but it is one of the few books that has never been out of easy reach since law school. Perhaps earlier. Every term the Judge uses on this show is easily found in those precious pages :).
Im sorry but the plaintiff needs to just stop. Its so ridiculous and juvenile to keep on.
well she is still talking about her motherhood 🙄
This was weird
only thing wrong with the plaintiff is that she got to emotional connected. that will never work as a paid baby sitter. You are there to monitor the children. nothing else and specifically no siding with any of the adults.
The sitter obviously does not watch the peoples court otherwise she would be able to pronounce the judges name. The judge even corrected her during the case, and yet in the after case commentary she mispronounced it again
Why doesn’t YT have an edit option? It’s so annoying lol The plaintiff is CRAZY. Plaintiff needed to mind her business.Busybody plaintiff doesn’t impress me one bit. I would never allow this woman near kids.She had no business meddling in THEIR business.
What a crying shame
I think the babysitter got what she wanted on the whole, the mother looks terrible and everybody can see it.
Guess if you can't read between the lines it might.
@@BillRebee You're not very good at guessing...
@Bill Rebee right? Plaintiff came off looking worse to me.