Aircraft Carriers Fleet in Service Ranking by all Country

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 січ 2021
  • Aircraft Carriers remain the flagship of the most powerful navies of the world with the United States leading the way. As of 2021, Helicopter Carriers are no longer included in this total and are given their own listing elsewhere on this site.
    Landlocked nations are NOT penalized for the lack of a standing naval force but those powers with clear access to oceans ARE penalized for lacking a carrier element. Aircraft carriers currently under construction are excluded.
    Data presented on this list is through 2021. Estimates are made when official data is not available.
    Follow Us
    For instant chat and help (use Instagram only )
    Instagram / worldtvstudio
    Facebook / worldtvstudio
    =======================
    Copyright @WorldTV Studio
    =======================
    Owner "B"

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,1 тис.

  • @sanjayshukla1441
    @sanjayshukla1441 3 роки тому +60

    0:14 ~ France 🇫🇷
    0:19 ~ Spain 🇪🇸
    0:25 ~ Russia 🇷🇺
    0:34 ~ India 🇮🇳
    0:40 ~ UK 🇬🇧
    0:45 ~ Italy 🇮🇹
    0:55 ~ China 🇨🇳
    1:00 ~ Japan 🇯🇵
    1:06 ~ USA 🇺🇸

    • @contentcreations512
      @contentcreations512 3 роки тому +8

      This is only a minute video. More time will be consumed clicking this time stamp

  • @harikrishnan4183
    @harikrishnan4183 3 роки тому +280

    India has 2 aircraft carriers one is in cochin shipyard ( ins vikrant ), will be commissioned soon.

    • @danishkfd
      @danishkfd 3 роки тому +17

      Only operational included

    • @_matlabi_duniya_
      @_matlabi_duniya_ 3 роки тому +16

      That way even china have 4 more

    • @decent4171
      @decent4171 3 роки тому +4

      In building for so fuckinggg long time😂

    • @decent4171
      @decent4171 3 роки тому +3

      @MIRACLE WITHIN YOU Good,hope the aircraft carrier quality have the same quality with Arjun Main battle tank👍

    • @decent4171
      @decent4171 3 роки тому +3

      @MIRACLE WITHIN YOU lol,why so many indians are over confident and speak nothing useful

  • @glypnir
    @glypnir 3 роки тому +232

    Note that the USA has 9 amphibious assault ships that have flight decks and can carry say 16 F35s and a bunch of helicopters. If you see one, you will say “that’s an aircraft carrier”.

    • @ggoddkkiller1342
      @ggoddkkiller1342 3 роки тому +27

      Yep and the worst part all of Japanese, Spainish and Italian ''aircraft carriers'' are actually helicopter carriers/amphibious assault ships that Turkey also launched one last year which will enter service in few months!! They could carry some vertical landing aircraft like F-35 or Harrier but it doesn't make them aircraft carriers really as their main purpose carrying an armored battalion so i must say this list is full of mistakes..

    • @glypnir
      @glypnir 3 роки тому +8

      @@ggoddkkiller1342 all these number lists are fascinating, but not a good indication of relative effectiveness. Carriers, planes, tanks and even towed artillery are rather far from generic. 1 Swedish tank doesn’t equal one tank from Mozambique.

    • @joshuavillafuerte985
      @joshuavillafuerte985 3 роки тому +1

      yeah and it carries the viper attack helicopter for the marine corps

    • @danielmonk7451
      @danielmonk7451 3 роки тому +3

      Yeah that's why some people say they have 24

    • @valerianocuomo996
      @valerianocuomo996 3 роки тому +2

      @@ggoddkkiller1342 idiot...ITALY 3

  • @nofrackingzone7479
    @nofrackingzone7479 3 роки тому +44

    The US has twenty aircraft carriers. Eleven super carriers and nine Amphibious assault ships which function as an aircraft carrier. Step up your research guys. They also forgot to mention a few like the HTMS Chakri Naruebet is the flagship of the Royal Thai Navy. Or the Argentine aircraft carrier Veinticinco de Mayo (25th of May).

    • @alexandermakrianis
      @alexandermakrianis 3 роки тому +2

      Argentina's carrier has been out of service for quite some time and sold for scrap, but Brazil has one that wasn't mentioned.

    • @cameronspence4977
      @cameronspence4977 3 роки тому +2

      Yeah they mentioned some countries as having aircraft carriers when really what they have is amphibious assault ships. Japan shouldnt even be on this list, Im pretty sure Italy only has 1 carrier not 2, and if theyre going to include amphibious assault ships then they should show all the countries that have them that were left out or didnt have theirs mentioned (US, China, Brazil, Thailand, South Korea)

    • @tancreddehauteville764
      @tancreddehauteville764 2 роки тому

      When you say "amphibious assault ships" I assume you mean escort carriers.

    • @justicehenrydamian475
      @justicehenrydamian475 2 роки тому +2

      @@tancreddehauteville764 nit really
      Amphibious assault ships are basically Aircraft carriers but not in the strict sense

  • @harshpashte4871
    @harshpashte4871 3 роки тому +27

    INS vikrant and INS vikramaditya 😍😍😍🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @randyproby215
    @randyproby215 2 роки тому +21

    After WWII a German General was asked about the King Tiger Tank loss to the American Sherman. He said "our one Tiger Tank could beat any 10 Sherman's, The problem was they always sent 11"

    • @johncarl5505
      @johncarl5505 2 роки тому +5

      Both tanks rarely met. Maybe 2 or 3 times.

    • @ascoop22
      @ascoop22 Рік тому +1

      @@johncarl5505 No both tanks met many times, 2 or 3 times is only American manned Shermans.

  • @mankadakkaran
    @mankadakkaran 3 роки тому +94

    🇮🇳

    • @jjk_x_yt
      @jjk_x_yt 3 роки тому +4

      malayali

    • @anish877
      @anish877 3 роки тому +3

      yeah so?

    • @Green_Kerala
      @Green_Kerala 3 роки тому +2

      Njaan perinthalmanna aane bro
      Neighborhood ❤️

    • @jjk_x_yt
      @jjk_x_yt 3 роки тому +1

      @@anish877 so do u have any problem

    • @anish877
      @anish877 3 роки тому +4

      @@jjk_x_yt yes but i don't speak jalebi.

  • @tunchap
    @tunchap 3 роки тому +170

    Thanks for showing *India* flag.🙏
    I love India flag.🇮🇳❤️

  • @pawannfcb
    @pawannfcb 3 роки тому +155

    Love from India ❤️🇮🇳

    • @pawannfcb
      @pawannfcb 3 роки тому +3

      @Mundo dos Games PowerPoint Nice ❤️👍

    • @pawannfcb
      @pawannfcb 3 роки тому +10

      @Mundo dos Games PowerPoint I love Brazil Football (soccer) team ❤️👍🇮🇳

    • @sumayaislam45
      @sumayaislam45 3 роки тому

      🍆

    • @Robin-369
      @Robin-369 3 роки тому +2

      @@sumayaislam45 😂😂

    • @mdgamer7239
      @mdgamer7239 3 роки тому +14

      @@sumayaislam45 🐖🇵🇰🐖

  • @Sean-hz1rt
    @Sean-hz1rt 3 роки тому +159

    India got 1 I'm service and 1 soon to be commissioned and other 1 under development stage

    • @abrahamtan9602
      @abrahamtan9602 3 роки тому +10

      Forever break down aircraft catriers. More for show only. Shouldn't even be included.

    • @danishkfd
      @danishkfd 3 роки тому +46

      @@abrahamtan9602 bruh what do you drink? INS Vikramaditya is in all time service. INS Vikrant is in trails you should probably shut up

    • @dhaneesht.s8510
      @dhaneesht.s8510 3 роки тому +4

      @@danishkfd ins vikrant is in my district i had been seeing it for 4 years

    • @danishkfd
      @danishkfd 3 роки тому +4

      @@dhaneesht.s8510 it for trails dude.

    • @thunderbird1921
      @thunderbird1921 3 роки тому +6

      Impressive. Your navy's definitely growing.

  • @amritprajapati6075
    @amritprajapati6075 3 роки тому +40

    *Love❤ & Respect🙇‍♂️ to All Nations From INDIA* 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🤗🤗🤗

  • @martyndyson9501
    @martyndyson9501 3 роки тому +35

    If your going to count every other countries small carriers like japans,italy then you have to count the US small carriers too, if you do then the US should have over 20, if you was to only count super carriers like the 11 US, the 2 British, 1 French, 1 chinese, 1 Russian and 1 indian.

    • @galbatorix060
      @galbatorix060 3 роки тому

      You forgot 2 italians ^ ^

    • @narwalsman8471
      @narwalsman8471 3 роки тому +2

      france has 3 small carrier for helicopter and hamphibious assault

    • @starvojager7016
      @starvojager7016 3 роки тому

      @@galbatorix060 3 Cavour, Garibaldi, Trieste and aren't " small' aircraft carrier

    • @justicehenrydamian475
      @justicehenrydamian475 2 роки тому +1

      You forgot to add the Chinese

    • @justicehenrydamian475
      @justicehenrydamian475 2 роки тому +1

      @Central Intelligence Agency and China's brand new one

  • @thanos8948
    @thanos8948 3 роки тому +56

    US Navy is a force in itself, even the US Navy Airforce is 2nd largest and strongest airforce in the world, second only to the US airforce, spending $205 billion on the Navy, which is humongous.

    • @benjaminanderson5263
      @benjaminanderson5263 3 роки тому +1

      Last I knew marines had the 3rd largest

    • @macta781
      @macta781 Рік тому

      @@benjaminanderson5263 it's like this Us airforce followed by navy followed by army then marine 5th is russia 6th china

  • @jammiedodger7040
    @jammiedodger7040 3 роки тому +100

    I swear Italy doesn’t actually have an aircraft carrier it has helicopter carriers the same for Japan

    • @abritishguy7295
      @abritishguy7295 3 роки тому +5

      all of Italy's carriers carry harriers or F-35's and japan is converting one of its Izumo class helicopter destroyers to carry aircraft and the other in a couple of years and possibly its Hyūga-class as well as part of a life extention program in the 2030's

    • @jammiedodger7040
      @jammiedodger7040 3 роки тому +15

      @@abritishguy7295 But it’s technically still a Helicopter carrier just with fighters on it

    • @abritishguy7295
      @abritishguy7295 3 роки тому

      @@jammiedodger7040 they were built as helicopter carriers but will be recognised as light carriers, they are similar in size and weight but they are different types of ships

    • @jammiedodger7040
      @jammiedodger7040 3 роки тому +7

      @@abritishguy7295 technically the HMS Queen Elizabeth is a light aircraft carrier and they are tiny compare to HMS Queen Elizabeth

    • @valerianocuomo996
      @valerianocuomo996 3 роки тому +2

      @@abritishguy7295 Italia 3...Trieste 280mt for F 35

  • @amitchoudharyusi2575
    @amitchoudharyusi2575 3 роки тому +83

    India 🇮🇳 has 2 aircraft carrier. 1 shetrail testing.

    • @minelaw454
      @minelaw454 3 роки тому +5

      But bro only one is in service other one is in testing and in the title is written that he has counted only that which are in service

    • @Abheeeeee9
      @Abheeeeee9 3 роки тому +1

      And two are being prepared

    • @yashwanthms6910
      @yashwanthms6910 3 роки тому +1

      Yes

    • @maharathikarna2284
      @maharathikarna2284 3 роки тому +2

      It will be in active service by this year end.

    • @mrash8856
      @mrash8856 3 роки тому

      @@minelaw454 china also have just 1 then because their other carrier is not operational although it is constructed fully

  • @birdedup
    @birdedup 3 роки тому +16

    it's not everyday that you see several HMS Ark Royals with F-14 Tomcats on them

    • @reymiguelperez6643
      @reymiguelperez6643 3 роки тому +2

      LOL! Did those F-14 Tomcats sunk the Bismarck?

    • @OutlawAlphat
      @OutlawAlphat 3 роки тому +1

      Wait someone still uses the tomcat lol that's like 80s stuff. Seriously I thought all of the british stuff was euro fighters

    • @99ron30
      @99ron30 3 роки тому

      @@OutlawAlphat The Ark Royal was decommissioned in 2011 and the British have never had F14 Tomcats. Maybe we allowed US F14s to launch and land from the Ark Royal at some point, but the only other operator of that aircraft is ironically Iran.

    • @jefffowler2587
      @jefffowler2587 2 роки тому

      @@OutlawAlphat baaaahahahahaha

  • @HeritageStacking
    @HeritageStacking 3 роки тому +22

    Well you forgot Australia. You forgot the US and its escort carriers. Also its new amphibious assault carriers. This is incredibly incomplete.

    • @thunderbird1921
      @thunderbird1921 3 роки тому +2

      If you add in amphibious assault ships (about 6-10 of which carry Harriers or F-35s), yeah, you're looking at over 20 carriers. America's Navy is just HUGE in terms of fleet size.

    • @martyndyson9501
      @martyndyson9501 3 роки тому +5

      Hes counted every other countries small carriers but not the US small carriers! You have to ask how much effort was put into this 2 min video! Its a poor show, im not American either im British but i like things to be correct!

    • @HeritageStacking
      @HeritageStacking 3 роки тому

      @@thunderbird1921 the amphibious carriers can carry 20 f35s. Then there is the 16 pocket carriers 2 choppers and 4 to 6 vtol f35s

    • @laurienorthrup6252
      @laurienorthrup6252 3 роки тому

      You forgot tyrants aircraft carer

    • @kristianxoto
      @kristianxoto 3 роки тому

      because they are LHD and not true carriers. STOVL aircraft are slower, smaller and carry less than true fixed wnged ones. and their missions are VERY different...because then you could also start counting russias Ivan Gren class because they carry aircraft too in form of ka-52k attack helicopters. or the two new shipd they building, forgot their name, they also carry this. you cant include an LHD or amp. ass. shhip with a pure carrier, its like comparing a multirole fighter against a air superiority fighter. like f/a-18 against f-14. a stands for attack(ground attack) hence they more robust and slower because of that.

  • @jayb3587
    @jayb3587 3 роки тому +8

    This ain't enough to stop the great Cthulhu from waking up again

    • @davidlipman8093
      @davidlipman8093 3 роки тому +1

      Not when his ophidian mass rises from the ancient depths!

    • @jayb3587
      @jayb3587 3 роки тому

      I'a Dagon! I'a Hydra. I'a.. I'a..

  • @MFurey
    @MFurey 3 роки тому +6

    Since this counts hulls, not on-duty ships with active combat air wings, the US has 21 carriers: 10 Nimitz and 2 Ford class nuclear carriers, plus 7 Wasp and 2 America class "amphibious assault" ships that already do or could quickly field F-35B air wings in a pinch. The latter are probably more capable than all but three or four of the boats from other nations counted here. And the difference in capability between the US nuclear carriers and all the others is so huge it essentially makes them a different kind of warship.

  • @bilinmeyenpro1656
    @bilinmeyenpro1656 3 роки тому +8

    TR 💪 AZ 💪 TR 💪 AZ 💪 TR 💪 AZ 💪 TR 💪 AZ BROTHER AZERBEİJAN FROM TURKEY

    • @Aadi_Kaushik
      @Aadi_Kaushik 3 роки тому +4

      😂😂😂 you guys have 0 Aircraft carrier

    • @user-pr1sp1og6d
      @user-pr1sp1og6d 3 роки тому +2

      @@Aadi_Kaushik Türkiye yapmaya başladı yakında görürsünüz 💪😎

    • @user-pr1sp1og6d
      @user-pr1sp1og6d 3 роки тому

      @Yomangamer 🐑🐑

  • @rajesh9305179307
    @rajesh9305179307 3 роки тому +30

    India has 3 - INS Vikramaditya, INS Vikrant, INS virat - virat has been retired recently

    • @MehulMehtaCA
      @MehulMehtaCA 3 роки тому +18

      Western people will always show Indian strength on lower side. We have 2 operational aricraft carriers and one under making and that too fully Indian technology!

    • @adityakaprawan7391
      @adityakaprawan7391 3 роки тому +5

      Right 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳❤️
      JAI HIND

    • @dnhdfnfkrjxjxfjjggj3002
      @dnhdfnfkrjxjxfjjggj3002 3 роки тому +2

      @@MehulMehtaCA I think we have 1 operational and 1 under sea trials which will be inducted this year only. Of cause , a 3rd one is under construction. Proud to be Indian🇮🇳🇮🇳

    • @arsenalsniping1711
      @arsenalsniping1711 3 роки тому

      @@MehulMehtaCA nope only 1 operational and available during combat times

    • @altafufidellagherarbastian6783
      @altafufidellagherarbastian6783 3 роки тому

      Stupratori di kids

  • @johnherr6062
    @johnherr6062 3 роки тому +6

    Well if the other country’s use Amphibious assault ships as Aircraft carriers then the United States has at least 22 Aircraft carriers!! The new F-35B is a game changer aircraft and its lethal....

    • @amorosogombe9650
      @amorosogombe9650 3 роки тому +2

      And that's before you count what they have in reserve of real catapult type aircraft carriers.

  • @ishocc
    @ishocc 3 роки тому +40

    In​ japan.​ It is not aircraft​ carrier​, it is destroyer ship.

    • @BIGJATPSU
      @BIGJATPSU 3 роки тому +2

      Gotta love political loopholes right? 😂

    • @conservativebrit1120
      @conservativebrit1120 3 роки тому

      @@BIGJATPSU It is not classified as an aircraft carrier. Also, both of italy's aircraft carriers are very small. Meanwhile, British aircraft carriers can carry more aircraft than any country other than the US... And we have two of them!

    • @BIGJATPSU
      @BIGJATPSU 3 роки тому

      @@conservativebrit1120 that's why I said politically loopholes. The Japanese government THEMSELVES have forbidden the country from having offensive aircraft carriers. So they call them "multi-purpose operation destroyers." Each is being refitted to carry up to 12 - F35B's just like on your QE class ships. And yes, your ships can carry at surge POSSIBLY up to 72 total aircraft making it the #2 in terms of capacity. But the normal load out will be more like 24-36 jets with copters. The Nimitz class, and eventually Ford class, at standard load out carry 64 jets plus copters and in times required are capable of housing and supporting 100+ jets if needs. But as Sir Alan West said, " The reason that we have arrived at what we have arrived at is because to do the initial strike package, that deep strike package, we have done really quite detailed calculations and we have come out with the figure of 36 joint strike fighters, and that is what has driven the size of it, and that is to be able to deliver the weight of effort that you need for these operations that we are planning in the future. That is the thing that has made us arrive at that size of deck and that size of ship, to enable that to happen. I think it is something like 75 sorties per day over the five-day period or something like that as well... I have talked with the CNO (Chief of Naval Operations) in America. He is very keen for us to get these because he sees us slotting in with his carrier groups. For example, in Afghanistan last year they had to call on the French to bail them out with their carrier. He really wants us to have these, but he wants us to have the same sort of clout as one of their carriers, which is this figure at 36. He would find that very useful, and really we would mix and match with that." So, welcome back to having a real Blue Ocean Navy again. The World won't like you much going forward, trust me.

    • @conservativebrit1120
      @conservativebrit1120 3 роки тому

      @@BIGJATPSU 36 is not full load though. 12 is full load for the japanese "carriers". Britain has a far more capable navy than japan.

    • @BIGJATPSU
      @BIGJATPSU 3 роки тому

      @@conservativebrit1120 Yes, I did say they could POSSIBLY carry up to 72 aircraft during a surge. But without being nuclear they probably couldn't sustain that for long.

  • @Lettejugler
    @Lettejugler 3 роки тому +4

    Genial.
    En mi opinión te ha faltado los nombres de los portaaviones.
    Gracias

  • @rishabhmishra8704
    @rishabhmishra8704 3 роки тому +5

    Us is ahead in everything ,amazing.

    • @mrgreen9388
      @mrgreen9388 2 роки тому

      Nope

    • @jefffowler2587
      @jefffowler2587 2 роки тому

      @@mrgreen9388 🤳 yuup

    • @justicehenrydamian475
      @justicehenrydamian475 2 роки тому

      Not. Everything

    • @jefffowler2587
      @jefffowler2587 2 роки тому

      @@justicehenrydamian475 who's better in what department?

    • @justicehenrydamian475
      @justicehenrydamian475 2 роки тому

      @@jefffowler2587 Russia is the world leader in Missile technology and on the ground (army) Russia is undisputed cos they know how to use their terrain and the have the best and most tanks.
      Navy /Ships Wise USA trumps any nation. USA also rules the skies although that can be quickly countered with Missiles

  • @moongrass217
    @moongrass217 3 роки тому +3

    The "sitting duck" analogy was funny.

  • @isrisentoday
    @isrisentoday 3 роки тому +2

    Great video as always. By the way, what is the title of the wonderful music?

  • @amorosogombe9650
    @amorosogombe9650 3 роки тому +9

    Was always going to be a short one.😄

  • @undine5458
    @undine5458 3 роки тому +18

    King Of Aircraft Carrier
    United States of America 🇺🇲💪

    • @danielmonk7451
      @danielmonk7451 3 роки тому +2

      And yet still can't win a war without us

    • @tigeruntamed6036
      @tigeruntamed6036 3 роки тому

      @@danielmonk7451 Whose us?

    • @danielmonk7451
      @danielmonk7451 3 роки тому +2

      @@tigeruntamed6036 the UK the people you can't win a war without

    • @tigeruntamed6036
      @tigeruntamed6036 3 роки тому +2

      @@danielmonk7451 Lol yeah we could. Lmao it'd very much the other way around good sir. The UK could not win a war by itself.

    • @danielmonk7451
      @danielmonk7451 3 роки тому +2

      @@tigeruntamed6036 British empire cough cough WW1 and WW2 we carried everyone

  • @vikasvaidande5487
    @vikasvaidande5487 3 роки тому +16

    Love from india 🇮🇳

  • @vishnushivanand2538
    @vishnushivanand2538 3 роки тому +5

    The speciality of this video ....only the power full cuntry's have an aircraft carrier..
    🇮🇳

  • @musqmeca5301
    @musqmeca5301 3 роки тому

    ótimo gráfico, apenas um gráfico desses mostra quais são as principais potências militares mundiais parabéns ao WorldTV Studio

    • @nathanoliveira5290
      @nathanoliveira5290 3 роки тому

      So n colocaram o PMH atlântico

    • @musqmeca5301
      @musqmeca5301 3 роки тому

      @@nathanoliveira5290 tudo bem? Só não colocaram o PMH atlântico você está correto, mas o que o vídeo se propôs? Air craft carriers, ou seja (porta-aviões) em matéria de porta-aviões o Brasil atualmente não tem, já teve o Minas e mais recentemente o São Paulo mas atualmente não tem mais, tem um porta-helicópteros o PMH atlântico que o governo Britânico doou mas enfim, o vídeo mostra porta-aviões.

  • @bharatbhushanmanitiwari8616
    @bharatbhushanmanitiwari8616 3 роки тому +7

    Soon India will have 2 aircraft carriers in 2021

    • @radhakrishnafanclub3693
      @radhakrishnafanclub3693 3 роки тому

      @Mohammed Wasiq still obsessed with toilets??

    • @spy1545
      @spy1545 3 роки тому

      @saan deserving reply

    • @Ajet32
      @Ajet32 3 роки тому

      India don't have food to eat what kind of carrier you taling about toilet carrier maybe

  • @leopic501
    @leopic501 3 роки тому +36

    The united states has more then eleven if you count the reserve carriers .

    • @danielmonk7451
      @danielmonk7451 3 роки тому

      No they don't they have 11

    • @itzladel
      @itzladel 3 роки тому +1

      @@danielmonk7451 11 are nuclear powered i think. But they have a couple reserved ones

    • @danielmonk7451
      @danielmonk7451 3 роки тому

      @@itzladel everyone has reserves it depends what you class as a reserve

    • @crapyjoe9894
      @crapyjoe9894 3 роки тому

      There is 20 but 9 are reserved they are Amphibious assault ships that can work as carriers

    • @crapyjoe9894
      @crapyjoe9894 3 роки тому

      @@itzladel no, there is 20 but 9 of them Amphibious assault ships that can work as carriers

  • @grenadenazi
    @grenadenazi 2 роки тому

    Saw this and thought "this'll be a short ass vid... well hell yeah minute and a half 😆"

  • @staticstudio4944
    @staticstudio4944 3 роки тому +1

    Simple and great

  • @jmchez
    @jmchez 3 роки тому +5

    You got to take into account that most of the USA's carriers are "Super-Carriers". They are nuclear powered, not diesel, and they are enormous!

    • @thunderbird1921
      @thunderbird1921 3 роки тому +1

      USS Gerald Ford (the newest one) is the largest yet in the fleet. As a matter of fact, it's said to be the largest warship EVER constructed. In terms of naval fleet power, the US vs China is almost an absurd mismatch (soon to be 12 vs soon to be 3 carriers).

    • @endeliggnist5066
      @endeliggnist5066 3 роки тому

      @@thunderbird1921 China doesn't need aircraft carriers; China simply needs the means to destroy aircraft carriers, and that comes in the form of the DF-17, a hypersonic glide vehicle that can destroy a carrier faster than she can hoist a white flag.

    • @endeliggnist5066
      @endeliggnist5066 2 роки тому

      @@matthewwolff1438 It sure is too bad the Chinese can't and won't wage wars on poor people with impunity to test their weapon systems, much unlike the US. But good luck trying to stop a hypersonic projectile you can't see nor detect.

    • @endeliggnist5066
      @endeliggnist5066 2 роки тому

      @@matthewwolff1438 "Unable to use stealth"? Hypersonic travel is inherently stealthy, because hypersonic travel creates an air pressure in front of the projectile, forming a plasma cloud as it moves, absorbing radio waves and making it practically invisible to active radar systems. This is not to mention that a hypersonic glide vehicle is designed to evade radar by undertaking an unpredictable trajectory by taking a low altitude, thereby evading the conical radio waves of radar.
      Are you really that disillusioned by your superiority complex that you still think you're fighting the Taliban, which by the way, came out on top after decades of fighting?

    • @endeliggnist5066
      @endeliggnist5066 2 роки тому

      ​@@matthewwolff1438 You're failing to take into account that capitalism, or rather feudalism, along with the Chinese civil war and the two Sino-Japanese wars completely decimated the Chinese economy, leaving the newly established People's Republic of China with little to fend for itself. Adding insult to injury, the US placed a trade embargo which further deprived the Chinese state of essential resources and hindered any form of international relief measures. As an agrarian society China is highly dependent on external circumstances to feed its people, with bad weather and natural calamities and droughts and floods causing recurring, extensive famines that has plagued China for millennia. Are you really going to blame communism for bad weather?
      Embarrassingly enough for you, China and other socialist countries actually experienced a period of food security after it's tenuous establishment. According to a paper titled _"Economic Development, Political-Economic System, and the Physical Quality of Life"_ by Shirley Ceresto, PhD, and Howard Waitzkin, MD, PhD, using the World Bank as the principal source of statistical data, not only did China and other socialist countries have a higher caloric intake than capitalist nations, they also had a better infant mortality rate, literacy rates, life expectancy, child death rates and physicians per capita. "Killing 70+ million people"? Please.
      Also, convenient must it be for you to gloss over the fact that capitalism has killed hundreds of millions more by priotising the profit motive above people's access to clean water, food, and healthcare to treat preventable diseases. Are you sure you're in a position to demonise socialism?

  • @lorenzo4408
    @lorenzo4408 3 роки тому +11

    Italy will have Trieste as well able to carry F35B, so 3 carriers

    • @thunderbird1921
      @thunderbird1921 3 роки тому

      China's building at least a third carrier as well, possibly a fourth also if intelligence reports are correct. Their navy's taking a major step up in the coming years. With India also building up, that standoff won't be restricted to the Himalayas much longer.

    • @TheFreshman321
      @TheFreshman321 3 роки тому

      No Italy will not have three. Trieste is replacing your mini carrier.

    • @valerianocuomo996
      @valerianocuomo996 3 роки тому +3

      @@TheFreshman321 290 mt idiot no mini

    • @lorenzo4408
      @lorenzo4408 3 роки тому +1

      @@TheFreshman321 First of all they are STOVL and 2 or 3 of them are much more useful than 1 CATOBAR like the french one. Last but not least Trieste, Cavour and Garibaldi will be all in service in the Italian Navy for at least 2 or 3 years when the Garibaldi will be refitted to become a space platform to launch military and civil satellites.

    • @piranhaplantX
      @piranhaplantX 3 роки тому

      This list, mostly, doesn't include that type of carrier. If it did, the numbers would be even more bloated for some nations, especially the US.

  • @giovannipompeu43
    @giovannipompeu43 3 роки тому +2

    gostei dos patinhos representando kkk

  • @Mahagauri3978
    @Mahagauri3978 3 роки тому +14

    India is having 2 INS Vikramaditya and INS Viraat

  • @sriharshakonakalla6552
    @sriharshakonakalla6552 2 роки тому +3

    Now INDIA have 2 Aircraft Carriers!
    INS Vikrant and INS Vikram Aditya

  • @munteanucosmin7237
    @munteanucosmin7237 3 роки тому +7

    As far as i know Japan does not have aircraft carriers, they have helicopter carriers

    • @Lapantouflemagic0
      @Lapantouflemagic0 3 роки тому +1

      yeah, the videos takes everything that floats and have flying stuff on top as an "aircraft carrier", but the english language is made this way.
      in french we use specific name for each, plane carrier (the big nuclear ones with catapult), aircraft carriers the catapult-less ones, and yes, helicopter carriers. britain, italy and spain have to my knowlegde only diesel catapult-less stuff, that have extremely limited offensive capabilites, while france havs a nuclear one basically equivalent to the US suff.

  • @mksop9723
    @mksop9723 3 роки тому +1

    Hey!😏 INDIA have two now
    INS VIKRAMADITYA
    INS VIKRANT

  • @mahesh7355
    @mahesh7355 2 роки тому

    Thanks for the info. Well deserved

  • @steveascension9626
    @steveascension9626 3 роки тому +9

    There seems to be some countries missing from this line up.

    • @danielmonk7451
      @danielmonk7451 3 роки тому

      No just very few countries have aircraft carriers

    • @piranhaplantX
      @piranhaplantX 3 роки тому

      @Shyamkumar Khangembam Do all of these missing countries currently operate large aircraft carriers? Because there really not not that many in the world. If anything, at least one of these countries should probably be removed, because it only has helicopter/VTOL carriers. Which, if counted, would more than double the US' carrier count.

    • @cemo3292
      @cemo3292 2 роки тому

      Not really but Turkey they are building one but its not finished yet

  • @D2DMOTORSPORT
    @D2DMOTORSPORT 3 роки тому +5

    it is funny the way everything was like 1 and 2 then suddenly 11

    • @Blank-401
      @Blank-401 3 роки тому +2

      If we Count the Helicopter Carrier then the USA has 20 Carrier XD

    • @lowgalaxy7232
      @lowgalaxy7232 3 роки тому +1

      Thats what we call global power

  • @obaidkhanz6690
    @obaidkhanz6690 3 роки тому +1

    Before india wer holding with one aircraft carrier which named was INS vikranaditya & now india wer holding with 2nd aircraft carries named INS vikrant and the 3rd carrier wer under process of INS vishal ..!!! India is getting super duper powerful across the globle
    " Proud to be an indian "..🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳💪

  • @jamesbunch1158
    @jamesbunch1158 2 роки тому

    Love these videos

  • @matpelor5590
    @matpelor5590 3 роки тому +3

    This what i called 100 thousand tons of diplomacy.
    By the way thailand already have one carrier too

  • @adhyatma6077
    @adhyatma6077 2 роки тому +3

    India has also two aircraft carrier,1) vikramaditya 2) ins vikrant .

  • @daverclees4482
    @daverclees4482 3 роки тому +1

    I was hoping to see Australia on this list but
    the closet thing we've got to an aircraft carrier is beach litter 🤔

  • @aspirants9
    @aspirants9 3 роки тому +1

    India,ll led one day .. ✊✊✊🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 jai hind Hain Bharat..

  • @redbaron18
    @redbaron18 3 роки тому +4

    India soon will be getting 3...INS Virbahu and INS Vikrant are under construction

    • @capteagle9
      @capteagle9 3 роки тому

      Only 2 bro....the one we have now and the INS Vikrant....

    • @Nickyb0001
      @Nickyb0001 3 роки тому +1

      @@capteagle9 The 3rd one is being planned

    • @capteagle9
      @capteagle9 3 роки тому

      @@Nickyb0001 no bro...it's been cancelled...our navy is focusing more on subs now...

  • @davemarkpanes1842
    @davemarkpanes1842 3 роки тому +3

    Maybe next time if you can show us also their names. Thanks.

  • @jeremyparvinrealestateinve7087
    @jeremyparvinrealestateinve7087 2 роки тому

    Great vid

  • @Jabber-ig3iw
    @Jabber-ig3iw 3 роки тому +1

    Uk also has a carrier on permanent deployment to the Mediterranean, it can operate more aircraft types than any other and is larger than any other carrier. It’s name?
    Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia. Sovereign British territory on the Island of Cyprus.

    • @neil5307
      @neil5307 3 роки тому +1

      Also Falklands, Diego Garcia, Gibraltar, South Sandwich Islands... Bermuda if required.

  • @rudo-armejec3882
    @rudo-armejec3882 3 роки тому +9

    Submarines: Torpedo goes brrrrrrrrrrrr

  • @crazyt1ger08
    @crazyt1ger08 3 роки тому +3

    Wow........and every country here seems to have a copy of the first HMS Ark Royal........who knew?

  • @williamjacsonramos9560
    @williamjacsonramos9560 3 роки тому +2

    Unfortunately 🇧🇷 had 1 (one), but was disabled. 😭😭😭.

  • @sharathkumar9251
    @sharathkumar9251 2 роки тому

    Love your animations 😍😍

  • @aaronthebest5519
    @aaronthebest5519 3 роки тому +33

    lol the uk and Italy have more carriers than India and Russia and the same amount as China and Japan 🇬🇧🇮🇹

    • @carlomarini4255
      @carlomarini4255 3 роки тому +13

      In reality Italy has 3 carriers: Garibaldi, Cavour, and Trieste. Salutations from Italy! Ciao!

    • @aaronthebest5519
      @aaronthebest5519 3 роки тому +2

      @@carlomarini4255 oh really wow lol

    • @valerianocuomo996
      @valerianocuomo996 3 роки тому +2

      @@carlomarini4255 top

    • @piranhaplantX
      @piranhaplantX 3 роки тому +6

      @@carlomarini4255 I think the main problem is that subtle differences in classification are lost on this channel. Some nations have their number bloated by assault/helicopter carriers, and some don't. If we included Helicopter/VTOL carriers, the US count could actually be doubled. Lol

    • @eagz2898
      @eagz2898 3 роки тому

      @@carlomarini4255 Hi Carlo!

  • @jaimete0589
    @jaimete0589 3 роки тому +5

    Come on Spain 🇪🇸🇪🇸 Arriba España

  • @OutlawAlphat
    @OutlawAlphat 3 роки тому +1

    Technically the US has about 30 of them there just docked and would need about 3-6 month to get ready for battle

  • @harikrisrain
    @harikrisrain 3 роки тому

    Wow

  • @Beginner_Aviator
    @Beginner_Aviator 3 роки тому +3

    Indonesia have 3 aircraft carrier

    • @Will_CH1
      @Will_CH1 3 роки тому +1

      Landing helicopter dock ships can only carry helicopters and are not classified as aircraft carriers.

    • @Beginner_Aviator
      @Beginner_Aviator 3 роки тому +1

      @@Will_CH1 tank ????

    • @Will_CH1
      @Will_CH1 3 роки тому

      @@Beginner_Aviator yes. And tanks

  • @lancemeintjies8244
    @lancemeintjies8244 3 роки тому +3

    Does Japan not have four aircraft carriers (although used just for helicopters)?

    • @danishkfd
      @danishkfd 3 роки тому +1

      They are known as helicopter carrier

    • @Blank-401
      @Blank-401 3 роки тому

      thats are "destroyer" but technical Amphibiouse assault ships cuz Japan is Not allowed to build Carrier

  • @ihavenolastname6314
    @ihavenolastname6314 3 роки тому +1

    Breaking news the only ever aircraft carrier in existence is ark royal

  • @cobragaming904
    @cobragaming904 3 роки тому +2

    You added helicopter carrier in this list

  • @equilibrium2147
    @equilibrium2147 3 роки тому +4

    US got 2 more in the pipeline 😁 The more the merrier !

  • @danielfronc4304
    @danielfronc4304 3 роки тому +4

    I do believe that you may've put this together in haste. As pointed out below, you just counted the U.S.'s super carriers. I do believe that we're holding their immediate predecessor ships in moth balls, at least for a modest period of time should some rogue nation states start feeling ftisky. Also, of course, as pointed out below we do have a numner of amphibious carriers which, while much more humble in size and threat, still can pack a punch. Sorry, but with your rushing to production you get an overall grade of D+.

  • @doyourspanishmotherfucker7533
    @doyourspanishmotherfucker7533 3 роки тому

    YOOOO U USED HMS ARK ROYAL MODEL MY FAVORITE WW2 CARRIER :D but why does it have jets tho...

  • @fubartotale3389
    @fubartotale3389 3 роки тому +1

    We don't have health care or debt free college, but we got a buttload of aircraft carriers

    • @FlbcImp
      @FlbcImp 3 роки тому

      As part of a socialised military

  • @zexxx011
    @zexxx011 3 роки тому +3

    You forgot Thailand and Brazil.

    • @soumikray437
      @soumikray437 3 роки тому

      Thailand has a helicopter carrier not air craft carrier

    • @surewindevera413
      @surewindevera413 3 роки тому

      Thailand 1 small aircraft carrier .. search plz.

    • @danishkfd
      @danishkfd 3 роки тому

      Both have helicopter carrier not aircraft any way Thailand is missing 14 helicopters in the carrier. Want LCH or LCH from India?😉

  • @Lapantouflemagic0
    @Lapantouflemagic0 3 роки тому +4

    uuh well it's nice and all, but you completely miss the huge difference between a "true" aircraft carrier with a catapult that allows tossing fully-loaded fighters into the air (and thus can be used offensively), and the cheap stuff that don't have a catapult, meaning you can only send half-loaded air patrols.
    not quite the same thing.

  • @TranscendenceEditz
    @TranscendenceEditz 3 роки тому +1

    Nice!
    Make Helicopter Carrier.

  • @user-ky9pu6gj1j
    @user-ky9pu6gj1j 2 роки тому

    Egypt have 2 kuznetsov-class aircraft carriers 🇪🇬
    BTW good video

  • @buddha4tw
    @buddha4tw 3 роки тому +6

    You can't compare these Aircraft Carries, they vary in size and complement of aircraft drastically, the HMS Queen Elizabeth total displacement of 65,000 tons does not compare that to the behemoth of a Carrier the USS Gerald R Ford displacement of 100,000 tons.

  • @valaybhatt4094
    @valaybhatt4094 3 роки тому +3

    At present, India has two aircraft carriers - INS Vikramaditya and INS Viraat in service & 3 is on its way

  • @matteobardella6634
    @matteobardella6634 3 роки тому +1

    Italy is 3 and Absolute no 2.. is Cavour Garibaldi Trieste and in 2023 is the new Aircraft Cesare augustus

  • @rameshnair1190
    @rameshnair1190 3 роки тому +2

    India has two, check it. Japan has hellicopter carriers.

    • @asi2765
      @asi2765 3 роки тому

      IAC 1 have not been commissioned yet so India have 1. and Japan will be modifying and operating f35s from their carriers and they will become light carriers.

  • @tatangatatanga5551
    @tatangatatanga5551 3 роки тому +5

    Spain and Japan are not holding aircraft carriers! LHD type vessels. These do not fall into the aircraft carrier class. There are many countries with LHD. For example, Australia, Turkey and Egypt.

    • @baltarbb4969
      @baltarbb4969 3 роки тому

      Ah no? El español llevacaramelos

    • @tatangatatanga5551
      @tatangatatanga5551 Рік тому

      @@baltarbb4969
      Landing Helicopter Dock(LHD)=Juan Carlos I (L-61)

    • @baltarbb4969
      @baltarbb4969 Рік тому +1

      @@tatangatatanga5551eso es un mero nombre. También ha llevado y lleva Sea Harrier.

  • @robertnijkamp2051
    @robertnijkamp2051 3 роки тому +3

    If you count Amphibious Assault ships as Carriers than the Uk should be at least at 4 and even the Netherlands would have two carriers the Rotterdam class could theoraticaly carry F35's

  • @satyasanatani436
    @satyasanatani436 2 роки тому +1

    India have 2 aircraft carrier 2021 keep safe ❤️

  • @emperor-adsx1126
    @emperor-adsx1126 3 роки тому +2

    Hello from Indonesia

    • @kaptentunggal8962
      @kaptentunggal8962 3 роки тому

      indonesi kagak ada 😤

    • @emperor-adsx1126
      @emperor-adsx1126 3 роки тому

      @@kaptentunggal8962 bukan itu maksud gw Bambang yang gw maksud itu, Gw Ngomong salam dari Indonesia

    • @kaptentunggal8962
      @kaptentunggal8962 3 роки тому

      @@emperor-adsx1126 iya gw nanyak indo kok gak ada

  • @RuBi-to5yt
    @RuBi-to5yt 3 роки тому +5

    У расии нет,авианосцев,есть авианесущий крейсер,а это совершенно разные классы кораблей

    • @senorpc
      @senorpc 3 роки тому

      ++. Только в этом году хотят построить, и то навряд ли. По сути авианосец нам не нужен, т.к. он больше для патрулирования нужен. Самолеты так и так можно запустить, а авианосец большой. Шанс пробить его высок. Смысл от него небольшой

    • @user-mg4kf9lp5d
      @user-mg4kf9lp5d 3 роки тому

      @@senorpc Вы совершенно не правы! По вашей логики и танки нам не нужны, запустил ракету и все!

    • @user-pt5oj1st2p
      @user-pt5oj1st2p 3 роки тому

      Авианесущий крейсер круче чем авианосец. Ибо два в одном.

  • @michaelh2001
    @michaelh2001 2 роки тому +5

    Yes China has two. One was scrapped by Russia and the Ukraine and bought under false pretenses. A shell company bought it to use as a “Casino.” China had to put in all of the electronics and armaments from scratch. That being said, the second is state of the art and looks amazing. They have a third under construction.

  • @ohmy5507
    @ohmy5507 3 роки тому +1

    Hello from real Iran

  • @robertobettinelli5239
    @robertobettinelli5239 3 роки тому +2

    l'italia avrà solo 2 piccole portaerei , ma ha la nave piu bella del mondo , Amerigo Vespucci

  • @prankingcity8920
    @prankingcity8920 3 роки тому +3

    Go Japan 🇯🇵

  • @mdjubair327
    @mdjubair327 3 роки тому +4

    USA is powerful countries in the world 😰😨💪💪👌👍

  • @sanketlamge8922
    @sanketlamge8922 3 роки тому

    At present, India has two aircraft carriers - INS Vikramaditya and INS Viraat, while it is planning to develop the third - INS Vishaal by 2022

  • @ishan_boy_22
    @ishan_boy_22 3 роки тому

    India have two aircraft carriers🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @carlomarini4255
    @carlomarini4255 3 роки тому +6

    In reality Italy has 3 carriers: Garibaldi, Cavour and Trieste. 💪🇮🇹

    • @richardgibson3160
      @richardgibson3160 3 роки тому

      Yes,.......but USA has 11, so contain your excitement 😄

    • @endeliggnist5066
      @endeliggnist5066 3 роки тому +1

      @@richardgibson3160 11 aircraft carriers while you have people sleeping on the streets. Way to go, America.

    • @albertoc.7976
      @albertoc.7976 3 роки тому +1

      @@richardgibson3160 but italy and usa aren't enemy. They are allied. Today the italian carrier Cavour is in the u.s naval station in norfolk for trainig with the marines with f35

    • @carlomarini4255
      @carlomarini4255 3 роки тому +5

      @@richardgibson3160 USA are a federation of more than 50 states. They are larger than entire Europe. So, comparing It with my country wich Is large like California State , Is very pathetic...... The ratio carriers/people or carriers/territory of Italy Is the highest in the world... So i'm proud of It.

    • @valerianocuomo996
      @valerianocuomo996 3 роки тому

      @@albertoc.7976 adios Capitan Nelson🤣Uk finish.caput🤣🤣country of shit and small

  • @vadimpm1290
    @vadimpm1290 3 роки тому +3

    US - no more ducklings.

  • @amorosogombe9650
    @amorosogombe9650 2 роки тому

    US has more than 11. The America and Wasp classes probably double that not to mention their mothballed fleet. US Navy is INSANE.

  • @slapshockredeemer8757
    @slapshockredeemer8757 3 роки тому +1

    Thailand and Brazil has 1 aircraft carrier each too.

  • @jammiedodger7040
    @jammiedodger7040 3 роки тому +28

    Russia do not have an aircraft carrier it doesn’t even move

    • @peterschmidt1453
      @peterschmidt1453 3 роки тому +2

      Russia did tow it down to Syria in 2019, call it 3/4 of a carrier.

    • @indyrock8148
      @indyrock8148 3 роки тому

      @@peterschmidt1453 what they towed it out to use it?
      Edit: that's a barge!

    • @peterschmidt1453
      @peterschmidt1453 3 роки тому +1

      @@indyrock8148 Yeah, Russia did Syria bombing runs from the barge, I mean carrier.

    • @yuriykiyko4568
      @yuriykiyko4568 3 роки тому +1

      Они России и не нужны)) Это прошлый век. Одна ракета и 100 000 тонн металлолома, который даже достать не получится, что бы переплавить. Будет служить рифом для морских обитателей))

    • @yuriykiyko4568
      @yuriykiyko4568 3 роки тому +1

      Кстати больше половина американских авианосцев также не на ходу))

  • @softballm1991
    @softballm1991 3 роки тому +5

    Did I miss S Korea? Oh if you are going to count Russia has having one Carrier, it has been in Dry dock for 18 + months and Russia is still not doing any repairs. Last item, if you are going to count carriers from other nations that are the size and scope of American Helo/assault carriers then you need to add the ten US assault carriers to the US list. With F 35 now being added to these ships they are more capable then all but, British, French, Italy carriers. Yes they are much more capable then China's two carriers.

    • @ln8312
      @ln8312 3 роки тому

      America will sell them in the next couple of years to buy foods.

    • @indiano.1.
      @indiano.1. 3 роки тому +1

      British?
      Going back to repair the boiler one day😂😂

  • @jcgardner5852
    @jcgardner5852 2 роки тому

    I do not think it includes the older US ones that are used now for helicopters but could be rearmed with fighter jets in just hours

  • @ayushrai8705
    @ayushrai8705 3 роки тому +1

    Now, india has got another, aircraft carrier count-2