I probably would have included the USS Lexington on this list considering what monsters it and the USS Saratoga were prior to WWII. Both were 888 ft long and close to 40k tons.
The USS Forrestal, (as old as it is) has a bigger strike wing than most "carriers" today. Personally my book for what makes a carrier a carrier is that it must be able to cover all air needs, meaning AWACS/AEW(Air Early Warning), Anti-air(all non-ballistic), anti-sub, and full load launches. Frankly, the majority of aircraft carriers on this list are just that, ships that carry aircraft, in the same sense they are only better than an arleigh burke because they have a larger airwing(if tomahawks and seasparrows dont count). most ships lack the AEW, and Full load launch capability, meaning that they cant be in their own battle group, moving them from being the tip of the spear to the shaft merely supporting it. The point of an aircraft carrier is first and foremost as a deterence, but its tough to call it one when a US or French carrier battle group could locate and intercept you(insert foreign battle group) before you even knew that there was a threat.
All needs in one ship = compromise and limitations. Just look at the Brits: they designed their carriers to do a Falkland Islands campaign, about as much as they will bite off again on their own 1v1. As such it can carry hundreds of Royal Marines, but at the cost of ski-jump instead of CATOBAR.
Great work on the video! Small observation, the Midway never had F-14s deployed on it. She went from F-4s directly to F/A-18s because of the height of the hanger bay. She did test Tomcats and recovered a couple of CVN-65's in the 80's. Again, well done video! Thank you!
I appreciate the video, if you ever remake this, do not that you left out some carriers. Shinano, Wolverine, Ranger, and others. Those are who I can think of right now...I'd gladly go into more detail if this gets expanded apon.
...and I have here found the total number of heavy carriers used during the fleets of the WW2. There were 72 hulls, with one-third of them lost. 76 hulls more were carriers cancelled, uncompleted or put to service already after the war. Within the latter figure are included e/g the Graf Zeppelin, the Aquila and many others. ♍🇵🇱👍
@@InfoRanker You know, carriers are my favourites. A true wonder od the last century; multi-faced class of warships. One would consider them a Japanese class because of Shinano and Akagi, somebody else - a British class because of Hermes and Eagle, third person - an American class because of Essexes. To me the class is... German, because of Graf Zeppelin. ♍👍
@Will Muny just talking about the ship it would be just fine in ww2 the carrier is nuke powered, it would propably im guessing have to use ww2 planes and ammo.
Heavy sigh...I liked it but where is the Kitty Hawk? :) Not only was she the first in her class (and the ship I served on) but instrumental in the development of the more modern supercarriers.
The flight deck was composed of Douglas Fir laid athwartships, with a finished thickness of 3 inches and 6 inches in width. Moisture content could not exceed 20% at time of laying the deck. Margin planks were composed of teak with the same dimensions. The Douglas planking had to conform with the “West Coast Lumbermen’s Association” with regards to “ship decking” quality.
Why weren't the LEXINGTON-class listed, they were bigger than most Japanese carriers...And why not the KITTY HAWK-class either...Bigger than Russian and Red Chinese carriers...
Those are two different carriers. The one in the video at 1:58 is the Viraat. I also added the INS Vikramaditya later in the video (the sister ship to the Vikrant). Thanks
You have a massive weight difference between Liaoning and Kuznetsov when they're the same. Are you going with empty ships or fully loaded? Because ships load up thousands of tons. US supercarriers load 20,000 tons. If you're going with some ships loaded weight and other ships empty weight then your list is pointless.
@@battlecraze Well, the billboard sided island did look something like that, however the original radar system on top of the island looked a lot different compared to this model.
This took a couple weeks for me to produce. Any like are greatly appreciated! Thanks for watching. :-)
Amazing
Wheres you fwom bwuv?
@@jamessomying United states .
Tomcats never flew off the Midway, they were too big. Phantoms, Crusaders and Hornets were the typical jets carried aboard.
Great video, thanks for the effort.
The tonnage of the Russian aircraft carriers is misleading because it does not include the weight of her ever present, escort tug boats.
Lol.😂
😂🤣😂🤣
😆
Boats
I probably would have included the USS Lexington on this list considering what monsters it and the USS Saratoga were prior to WWII. Both were 888 ft long and close to 40k tons.
The USS Forrestal, (as old as it is) has a bigger strike wing than most "carriers" today. Personally my book for what makes a carrier a carrier is that it must be able to cover all air needs, meaning AWACS/AEW(Air Early Warning), Anti-air(all non-ballistic), anti-sub, and full load launches. Frankly, the majority of aircraft carriers on this list are just that, ships that carry aircraft, in the same sense they are only better than an arleigh burke because they have a larger airwing(if tomahawks and seasparrows dont count). most ships lack the AEW, and Full load launch capability, meaning that they cant be in their own battle group, moving them from being the tip of the spear to the shaft merely supporting it. The point of an aircraft carrier is first and foremost as a deterence, but its tough to call it one when a US or French carrier battle group could locate and intercept you(insert foreign battle group) before you even knew that there was a threat.
they all lack shields
All needs in one ship = compromise and limitations. Just look at the Brits: they designed their carriers to do a Falkland Islands campaign, about as much as they will bite off again on their own 1v1. As such it can carry hundreds of Royal Marines, but at the cost of ski-jump instead of CATOBAR.
Its better because theres A LOT MORE CARRIERS. These models look awesome
Thanks Paul, glad you enjoyed. 😀
the first three is from wowsblitz lol (i guess)
I find it interesting the amount of modern carriers that utilize the ski-jump design.
I think it’s because it just works, why spend billions on a launch system when a ramp does the same thing
FINALLY! Someone actually got the displacement of the HMS QE class correct.
😃
That's amazing my step dad, here in Virginia got to work on the USS Nimitz and Theodore roosevelt. Pretty epic.
That is awesome !
Great work on the video!
Small observation, the Midway never had F-14s deployed on it. She went from F-4s directly to F/A-18s because of the height of the hanger bay. She did test Tomcats and recovered a couple of CVN-65's in the 80's.
Again, well done video! Thank you!
Thanks for the info!
I appreciate the video, if you ever remake this, do not that you left out some carriers. Shinano, Wolverine, Ranger, and others. Those are who I can think of right now...I'd gladly go into more detail if this gets expanded apon.
Maybe one day, thanks 😀
just goes to show how terrifying the Kido Butai must have been, their ships being larger than some modern carriers
❤
Amazing work as usual.
Thanks!
...and I have here found the total number of heavy carriers used during the fleets of the WW2. There were 72 hulls, with one-third of them lost. 76 hulls more were carriers cancelled, uncompleted or put to service already after the war. Within the latter figure are included e/g the Graf Zeppelin, the Aquila and many others. ♍🇵🇱👍
❤
@@InfoRanker You know, carriers are my favourites. A true wonder od the last century; multi-faced class of warships. One would consider them a Japanese class because of Shinano and Akagi, somebody else - a British class because of Hermes and Eagle, third person - an American class because of Essexes. To me the class is... German, because of Graf Zeppelin. ♍👍
That is awesome!... I been on 3 aircraft carrriers I been interested ever since .. thanks from NZ 👍🇳🇿
Glad you enjoyed it!
que genial , aunque alguna medidas no coincidían igual estuvo bueno . 👍
Hms Prince of Wales is heavier than the sister ship..I believe they are 75'000 ,maybe more
any Yamato class aircraft carriers?(shinano)
I love alternate history, try to imagine the Gerald Ford Class in WW2, Just one could have done it all.
@Will Muny just talking about the ship it would be just fine in ww2 the carrier is nuke powered, it would propably im guessing have to use ww2 planes and ammo.
I still can't believe that the graf zeppelin is a real warship or not
❤
they had aircraft carrier but it was first and last one and aircrafts were not suited for that carrier.
hi could you make comparison between human,taller and wider building with aircraft carrier
Heavy sigh...I liked it but where is the Kitty Hawk? :) Not only was she the first in her class (and the ship I served on) but instrumental in the development of the more modern supercarriers.
Where is Thai's HTMS Chakri Naruebet?
Seems you forgot the Kittyhawks… Conni..America…Kennedy.
What about shinano?
bro make a totorial video on this plzzzzzzzz
IDK if im wrong, but shouldnt the essex have a steel deck instead of a wooden one?
The flight deck was composed of Douglas Fir laid athwartships, with a finished thickness of 3 inches and 6 inches in width. Moisture content could not exceed 20% at time of laying the deck. Margin planks were composed of teak with the same dimensions. The Douglas planking had to conform with the “West Coast Lumbermen’s Association” with regards to “ship decking” quality.
Eurofighters on brasilian carrier? Should be A-4
I like how a russian aircraft carrier is "kiev"
Soviet era ship, kinda ironic now.
@@InfoRanker ih ok
Why are Helicopter Carriers included but none of the US Helicopter Carriers included? Tarawa Class etc.
and Shinano?
Where are the babes on the Jetski ?
where is the SHINANO?
ชื้อที่จอดเครื่องบินรบ U.S.A 59 ลำที่สอง 1 ลำครับ
You didn't add Shinano
This channel deserves 7 billion subscribers
Hahah, I agree! Thanks Ademir
It really does
bro that is literally earth population not everyone is interested of this channel
Good one, however some aircraft carrier's are off-model and unproportioned.
I guess they forgot the IJN Shinano.
What about habaika
make another video now
wheres the shinano?
Why weren't the LEXINGTON-class listed, they were bigger than most Japanese carriers...And why not the KITTY HAWK-class either...Bigger than Russian and Red Chinese carriers...
isnt kiev and vikramaditya the same thing
No Lady Lex CV-2 :(
The tonnage of HMS Queen Elizabeth is so big?
it's 6400 tons, he is not use inthernational ton
@@frankfleming1103 then what is he using?
@@Phoenixlp44 it said it is called short ton
Kebalik kamu seharusnya yang no mor Satu itu uss enterprise
'
what happen american USS George H.W. Bush (CVN-77) is not show this video
You forgot about USS Enterprise (CV-6) as well as USS Hornet (CV-8)
1:19 is when USS Yorktown CV-5 is shown. She is the lead ship of the Yorktown class that includes CV-6 and CV-8.
Admiral Kuznetsev, like Kiev, was built in Ukraine (Nikolaev city), but now they are fighting against the one who built them ...
what game
where is the vietnam boat
Where ulyanovsk?
INS Vikrant aircraft carrier length 263
All the details in it are false
Where is the Harry s. Trooman
Where is enterprice?
USS Enterprise enters at 4:04
폭 70~80m and 길이 340m 축구장 70m x110m ㅡ3개에 전투기 70 대 ㅡ80대ㅡ갚판위에서 지하격납고 ㅡ전투기ㅡ120 대ㅡ130 대 ㅡ설계방식은 최대전투기 탑재할수있는 장점를 갖는다 ㅡ
I’m waiting on CV100…The David Chapelle class
2:52
Cvh-991 Thailand 🇹🇭 😔
2:53 KIEV ? Built in Ukraine?
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙈🙈🙈🙈🙉🙉🙉🙊🙊🙊🇹🇭🇹🇭💖💖🌹❤️❤️❤️🌍🌍🌍🌍👻👻👻👻👻👻
Seawater donghai meet 항모전체ㅡok degance option ok
U.S.S.J.F.K. CV-67...3-M.M.R.NOBODY BEATS OUR 60 YEAR OLD CARRIERS,,,EVEN TODAY...
❤
It is INS VIKRANT Not Viraat😠
Those are two different carriers. The one in the video at 1:58 is the Viraat. I also added the INS Vikramaditya later in the video (the sister ship to the Vikrant). Thanks
You have a massive weight difference between Liaoning and Kuznetsov when they're the same. Are you going with empty ships or fully loaded? Because ships load up thousands of tons. US supercarriers load 20,000 tons.
If you're going with some ships loaded weight and other ships empty weight then your list is pointless.
how do you know it's the same?
Felling proud as an indian
미니츠급 항모가 11만톤급이 미국 ㅡ풀로리다 제작ㅡ중국은 다렌 항공모함제작을 주도합니다
정의의 사단인 항공모함 ㅡ민본정치 근본귀일 돌아간다
The world 미니츠급 항공모함ㅡ항공모함ㅡ동해안 pull.집결토록하시고 god defance option order wait ok 👍
ㅡ도통군자올림ㅡ
Thailand air carrier
YES
Bigger means easier target
Missiles would be simply shot down by either the carriers Air wing, the escorts ant air weapons or the carriers anti air weapons themselves.
India poover contry 126 place In India
You really think USS enterprise has such ugly huge bridge?
Find better model, or create yourself(if you can)
Uhhh, that's exactly what it looks like.
@@battlecraze Well, the billboard sided island did look something like that, however the original radar system on top of the island looked a lot different compared to this model.
I just checked some google images of the bridge and it looks nearly identical to the one in the video. Not sure what you're complaining about.
Cvn 65 big e's island is similar to long beach class nuclear powered missile cruisers.
I had to stop watching when you skipped Chakri Nairuebet the Thai aircraft carrier.
Definitely a 👎🏼