The Rise of Britian's Fastest Ever Sprinter
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 лип 2023
- In this video we examine Zharnel Hughes 9.83 British Record Performance at the 2023 New York Grand Prix and take a look back over his career so far.
Split times: / lr_jeffrey_07 - Спорт
![[柴犬ASMR]曼玉Manyu&小白Bai 毛发护理Spa asmr](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0TsXQ7z2Dh4/mqdefault.jpg)
Good that someone on youtube is acknowledging that the splits are wrong😂😂
6.47/3.36 does make a lot more sense. We have seen Zharnel run 6.45 already this year in an outdoor 60m so 6.47 doesnt seem unreasonable for a PB race
Shout out to Jeffrey for this!!
If you don't mind explaining, why'd you suspect that they were wrong?
@@testingsomething5280Adding on, you don’t reach your top speed in the last 10 meters of a 100. The fastest splits are reached usually between 50-80m.
@@testingsomething5280 As @HONEST-xj4rr said you don't reach your top speed in the last 10m. And then speed itself is too high the distribution of the race wouldnt make sense. The splits have him decelerating then accelerating then decelerating. Nobody has ever had a 3.31 40m split coming off of a 6.5 60m split. And 3.31 would be 2nd fastest ever.
@@actual_random 3.31 s would be the 3rd fastest ever, tied with Gay. Bolt managed to get 3.27 s and 3.28 s on two separate occasions. Btw, Bolt would have clocked 3.30 s in his Beijing race, had he not slew down across the finish line.
The "official" split times made no sense whatsoever. They go up and down like crazy... that's not how they should go in a 100 m race. These split times by Jeffrey make much more sense and that's what one would expect - minimum split time somewhere between 60 and 80 m, and deceleration from that point on towards the finishing line. Not what the official split times were telling...
Also, his 3.31 s (60...100 m split) alone was highly suspicious... 3.31 s is crazy, crazy fast... Only Bolt has ran faster than that...
When you analyze the official 10 m splits and you couple that to a 3.31 s 60-100 m split, then you know for sure something is wrong.
Last weekend he Recently ran a 19.77s 200m with a 2.3 tailwind!
Zharnel is straight up fast. His top end is probably the best around. If he can execute this year it's a great year to steal a global gold medal with the guys only running around 9.9 at the moment.
Hello. I saw that you also had issues when you applied for AdSense (the W-8BEN tax form). How did you solve the issue of "No treaty applied". Thanks!!!!!
Do you have a link to where I posted about this? I'll read back over it and try to help you but I can't remember right now
Can someone explain to me what it means for him to not be doing any speed work yet, what does his coach have him doing before speed work?
In DBZ terms it means "This isn't even my final form" 😂
Just playin man. I'm not an elite sprinter, but from my understanding as an average sprinter. It means they haven't done any intense workouts to prime athletes for speed.
Usually in pre season or leading up to a major champs. Athletes will do workouts focusing on technique and endurance. The speed work can be incredibly taxing on the body and so coaches will wait until close to majors to do speed work.
When you hear someone say "I haven't done any speed work" think of it as "We haven't primed my body to run at its max speed yet. We're primarily focusing on endurance and technique, because doing the speed work now will take too much from us"
I hope this helps you understand. If anyone understands this better than me feel free to comment
To be honest it could mean anything. Speed work might be being used very loosely here.
UKA considers this sprints upto 7s where you reach maximal velocity. And 95-100% effort
I would say any sprint with at least 30m acceleration and >=95% effort has to be classed as speedwork.
Hes been doing 60ms and 100ms for a while. SO whatever he is calling speed work might actually be something different using the proper definitions. He could have been doing 150s and 200s for example but if theyre full effort then technically he is still getting speedwork in the first 7s of that sprint but he hasn't been doing sessions specifically with max velocity sprinting in mind.
@@actual_random This can also be it. The speed work I described is from my coach. Some athletes/coaches have different definitions of speed work
@@actual_randomYea that's what I'm thinking. Obviously he's working on speed technically speaking. But from the context of a sprinter he may not just be going 100% in practice. Maybe just 93% for example, and letting the races be his true speed work for now
What he means by he hasn't been doing speed work simply means he hasn't started yet to go all out on short sprints on training example 30/40/50/60/80meters so coming to competition without having done those in training means I haven't done speed work yet
This guy has just managed to become faster over 60...100 m than Lyles' PB over the same distance. Impressive... Does anyone know what's Zharnel's second fastest 60...100 m split time?
3.40 was Hughes’ fastest before this (2022 World Champs Heat) (6.57+3.40).. his 9.91 PR was 6.47+3.44
That's because lyles is just over hype and honestly he isn't that that fast in the 100 the difference with zharnal has been his really bad starts and running low 9.9 witch obviously translate to low 9.8 or 9.7 maybe with improvement in his start
@@nsxperformance hmm, ok. 0.04 s over 60...100 m seems quite an improvement, doesn't it?
I've always heard (maybe I am wrong) that is is tougher to improve the 2nd part of the 100 m, because there's little one can do to run faster (top end speed), whereas the start (0...60 m) is actually where one can make some improvements, through polishing of technique, strength exercises and so on. I am under the impression that, Gatlin for instance, was obsessed about the 0...60 m split, because he knew not much could be done past 60 m.
@@DG-iu8ck Yes, I agree. But I would say that Lyles is fast down the 60...100 m split. Is he the fastest ever? Not at all. He is the fastest currently? Not even that, as just shown by Zharnel, and also as shown last year by Kerley who ran 3.35 s (I think) and 3.36 s in the 60...100 m split as well, so.
But other than these 2 sprinters, Lyles may be, currently, the strongest finisher in the 100 m, no?
Overall Lyles' main issue in the 100 m will always be his start. His 0...60 m time does not seem to drop below 6.50 s and he has been trying hard for quite some time now, so I am not expecting for him to drop below 6.50 s any time soon. If Lyles does not drop his 0-60 m split below 6.50 s, he won't go sub 9.8 s in the 100 m, that's for sure.
@@Yes_I_c4n This year joe split 3.37 60-100m in his 9.98 race in april. Lyles this year hasn't went below 3.40.
Taller sprinters can have good starts. Its just a little harder because they weigh more. A larger object with the same power will start slower but finish faster. If the larger object matchs the smaller object pound for pound wich means it has much more power it will take of at the same speed. Leg strength is what gave Asafa good starts.
@TheJackOfAllTrades777 A 200 pound man that can squat 600 pounds or more can run a 4.4 or better same as me at 5'9.
Asafa's hip flexors are seemingly what gave him his advantage. They're enormous
How long has Hughes been training under Mills?
Since about 2018/19.
He has ran one 100 metres race at 9.83 seconds.
Please do not jump the gun and let's see what he is gonna next!
He's juiced 100%
Proof??
Yeah ik
Like every other sprinter
Just like every pro sprinter
@@humanboy395 why are you copying me dumba22
SUPICIOUS TIME AND SUSPICIOUS HAIR LOSS
LMAO!
LOL bruh 💀
@@user-ze3sg6ix1u DOH PLAY LIKE YOU BLIND WE ALL SEE IT BRUH
He’s on that jerk sauce special they serve in the Caribbean.