Video of the accident of the supersonic missile-bomber Tu-22M3
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 вер 2017
- The collapse of a supersonic bomber Tu-22M3 bomber
The incident occurred at the airfield Shaikovka (Kaluga region)
The cause of the accident was the failure of the speed sensors during the run. The sensors could refuse due to water entering from the sump of the system into the speed metering line during longitudinal acceleration during the takeoff run.
![Tsar Bomba Declassified Documentary Upscaled 4K60 [Read Description] [Turn on CC]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Swmcldi_jc4/mqdefault.jpg)
"Blyat, Sergei, This Tu-22M3 has turned into an Uaz 4x4"
Xd
Except the Gas mileage is a bit below the curve really. And spares out in the Taiga are hard to come by...:-)
TIm Fidler
👍
A pretty good testament to airframe durability and conscious placement of fuel that this wasn’t a huge fireball! I very much dislike seeing the misfortune of any airmen or beautiful aircraft, nationality be damned! Glad to hear these guys were ok.
Good engineering.
Tbh, there was another crash when one of the aircraft was descending to land in poor weather conditions, it's sink rare was far too high and it hit the runway heavily- causing the entire front portion of the aircraft to break off and burst into flames , meanwhile the rear section continued to fly for 50 meters or so and then hit and fireballed
Only 1 of the crew survived,
In my opinion the aircraft is actually quite fragile, then again considering the force of the impact perhaps no aircraft would have withstood it
@@josephmathers2211 It's featured at the end of this YT video: ua-cam.com/video/6f2lAwnxgTw/v-deo.html
Komrad trump thanks you
It's true all over the WORLD We love the planes designed in the Soviet era more
Yikes! I was expecting a fireball at the end. Glad everyone survived.
Nyet, ran out of fuel halfway.
Maybe accidental deployment
In most cases you would have seen a big fireball with a monstrous plane like this. Especially when that wing broke spilling the fuel. Didn’t I see the wing break??
The typically robust landing gear of most Soviet aircraft was a godsend to this crew.
You're stoned if you think the landing gear survived that. All three gear sheared off, which is by-design and actually safer.
Jesus H, some serious drug use right there.
@@Skank_and_GutterboyBro… watch that video again… that thing sent it through the bush a couple hundred yards before anything major happened. I can’t think of any supersonic bomber that could have done that.
@@TrevorSachko Dude. Watch that video again… that thing sent it through the bush a couple hundred yards before anything major happened. I can’t think of any supersonic bomber that could have done that.
@@thexchox1554 Oh dear. You seem to know little about how aircraft work. End result, aircraft was toast. Muptard...
Not everyday you see a TU-22 off roading!
Norse King
Bet that had their full attention 😄
Lucky crew👍
Versatile aircraft . thank God the crew is ok .
The chassis was not replaced with an off-road chassis.
@@billhuber2964 That is a miracle!
Not every day the Kremlin has to stump up the panel beating bill for a TU-22 off roading either..
Russian aircraft fuel tank has proved superb
Has this bomber returned to service or is it still in maintenance ???
@@ziedmefteh2658 upgraded, u can see this bomber ready upgrading project on russia insight chanel
Pity about the rest of it......
Agreed 👍
@@ziedmefteh2658 Rough guess is it was a wright-off.
I guess you could say their plans for taking off Backfired...🥁
"Badabum, tsh"
🤣
Its wierd that no one was "Rushin" to help out
That was amazing!
I see what you did there
Any take off you can walk away from is a good one!
Except he never took off.
Aborted take-off therefore aborted landing as well. :D
@@johnhanson9245 1 out of 3 gear left the ground so its technically a takeoff
In my eyes a good takeoff is one that succseeds
Looks like he abandoned take off too late, but these Tu-22 planes were tough to get airborne at the best of times and need long runways. Glad they survived ok.
Glad the crew wasn’t hurt.
It is with great pleasure that I can read comments from intelligent people referring to technical and objective conditions about this "failed take-off". It is a common accident, although not too frequent, and according to the explanation of several readers, it is clear that they are experts in aeronautics or pilots who analyze with a professional eye. Best regards
Интересует два вопроса: не верю, что на Ту-22 нет резервного прибора указателя скорости (спидометра), полностью независимого от основного. И второй: члены экипажа следят за скоростью от начала разбега. Почему же они решили прервать взлет после достижения V2?
Бухие имхо
И снова ответ лошкомойника.
Criticism can go both ways. This Russian bomber debuted in 1962 and upgraded. The US have B-52 bombers from the same era with upgrades. While this landing (or aborted takeoff) didn't result in deaths, A B-52 flown by a cowboy jockey did destroy one in a low level airshow unauthorized turn, killing all on board. The USA and Russia as well as many nations with sophisticated air forces have run up training deaths whether from poorly maintained aircraft, unauthorized maneuvers or just plain accidents. One B-2 stealth bomber crashed just after takeoff with both pilots ejecting safely. Laughing at our nemesis when America makes mistakes, throwing epithets at each other is simply childish and a reason many here aren't in the position to make life and death decisions piloting multimillion dollar aircraft. Military pilots fully accept risks with some dying to be among the best. Any of you man enough to restrain yourself when a decision comes from high up to launch a nuclear weapon from land, air or at sea? Only the mature and disciplined of men and women take up a responsibility that can alter history - WW III. A war to end mankind as we know it. Whether Russian or American, aircraft crashes are part of military service to prepare for the worst while hoping never to use weapons that can bring civilization to a standstill.
Why do you give this comparison?
Well,.. Give them the benefit of the doubt at least.
I'm sure they could have Crashed SPECTACULARLY.
If they could have gotten off the Ground 😂
One of the parachute didn't open correctly. And no joke how many Jets and military war ships been crashed especially in Japan. RUSSIA rocks
maybe you should look up the incident with the B52 at Fairchild AFB and the reasons behind it.
@@maxfisher7374 My comments are directed to criticism from armchair quarterbacks with zero empathy, displaced patriotism, low self esteem.
That was a take-off, not a landing.
an 147 ...well that was the quickest landing after a take-off
Its aborted take off.
It is a take-off man look the parachute
Speed sensors malfunctioned due to water entering them during acceleration.
Aborted take off. You should see a F111 abort and slam the departure end barrier sometime, 4 tapes, 4 motors and still pull 1200+ feet.
During takeoff, due to water ingress, the speed sensor failed, so the crew decided to stop takeoff, and since the plane was fully fueled, the takeoff run was greater, therefore, when the takeoff was stopped, the runway was not enough
Peto sensors once again
@@dessmith7658 The word is pitot.
No no no... TSB investigators found too much Wodka in the injectors and behind the stick... Case was closed with the full report...
Насчёт попадания воды.Откуда ей взяться,если даже дождя не наблюдается.Это явное нарушение правил обслуживания авиационной техники.
@@user-sy1tw2fs5g командир экипажа вроде принимает - а инженер сдаёт под роспись?
Was 4x4 an option for those ?
I think only a Russian would just continue taking video and not say a word or look away. And that's not a bad thing!
Great comment!
When you just changed the keybindings on your pc and still not used to it
So what happened to the aircraft? Is it written off or they just hammered the fuselage here and there, give a new wheels and fly again tomorrow?
"That's coming out of your wages"
What wages?
damn lucky...no fire
На выкатной как всегда съэкономили....
А почему он не взлетел?
Нерабочий указатель скорости причина для перерыва взлёта? Есть же запасные приборы...странно
That pilot has a great career ahead working for Aeroflot.
Aeroflop..
@Jeniffer Bachtold nobody gives a shit about your stupid scam lol . An then you have another clown comment that it works .
Dang, that's hard on the paint job!
Must have been bloody serious to abort so late into the takeoff run. I was under the impression that late on you are committed,assuming it reached V1 but there seems to be no attempt at rotate. Very lucky it didn't go bang! Hopefully crew are safe.
Martin Mc Parland The exception to the V1 rule is if the pilot reasonably feels the plane simply will not fly if it gets into air, and it’s safer to overrun than continue the takeoff in an aircraft that has no flight controls.
Jochen Heiden nice one,we live and learn!
Martin Mc Parland if you’re interested in this topic google Omega Air Refueling crash at Point Mugu in 2011. A Boeing 707 rotated and left the ground and 20 feet airborne the #2 engine came off the wing. Captain put it back down and overrun but survived. That plane was not airworthy despite being well into V2 speed.
Jochen Heiden will have a look for that now. Thank you sir,have a great new year!
Read the description. There's secret info in there.
That s why it’s necessary to calculate V1 speed...
А у других тоже не показывали приборы скорости? В самолёте два датчика на скорость по бокам самолёта стоят. У нас стояли такие ранее. Только я техником на других был. Странно как то. Жалко самолёт ТУ-22 М-3. Корову на нашем аэродроме грузили в Особенности Национальной Охоты.
Грузили корову в Ту-22М3, выруливал Ту-22М2, а проход над аэродромом делал Су-24...)) "Особеннолсти национальной съёмки" кино...)))
That’s some real grassroots flying
Why does it says "landing" on the description when obviously was trying to take off?
Russians lie a lot.
У самолёта не выпущены закрылки или мне показалось
I see flat wings, are there no leading edge slats or flaps to extend before takeoff?
Are you sure this is a M3 model of the Tu-22? If not, would explain why they stayed with the plane, older models have downward firing ejection seats.
The fact that this is a modification of the M3 even the schoolboy knows about it
So the latest, greatest model of the Tu-22 still sucks.....funny.
Я не специалист но сразу заметил, очень медленно разгоняется, ему и две полосы нехватилобы.
Damn. Hope the crew is ok
Я как диванный эксперт считаю надо мягко тянуть на себя до отрыва передней стойки. Даже пусть взлёт будет на бОльшей скорости. А что скажут не диванные эксперты?
Вот она школа, скорость отказала, давай по тормозам рвать после V1, пусть в церковь ходят что не загорелись
Все правильно сделал. Никакое железо не стоит жизней экипажа.
Абсолютная вина командира!Нужно было взлететь развернуться и сесть датчик по топливу это не причина чтобы прекращать взлёт,тем более что с точкой невозврата явно запоздали
@@user-jv5oe7fy2h Еще один недоучка... В описании написано что у самолета отказал датчик скорости а не топлива. Как ты на таком самолете собираешься садиться с отказавшим датчиком скорости?
@@denvvv187 Признаю свою вину,Степень,тяжесть,Глубину!..😊
Happy to read in comments that pilots & flight crew are ok.
Hallo wolte der Pilot Start abheben ? Und hat die Machine nicht hoch bekommen weil der last zu schwer war ? Und deswegen schnell bremschirm hausgemacht und schup raus und Brems Rad voll bremsung eingeleitet ? Bitte mir irgtenjemand mir schreiben der das weiß danke
When you watch Russian dash cam video, this makes perfect sense.
Stupid.
Go fuk ur self! 😀
Totally underrated comment.
TRUE !!!
"CYKA BLYAT!"
Looking at the Take off run I was looking at the Leading edge devices on the L/H wing they seemed to be further out than the R/H wings Plus the Runway looks very short for an aircraft of this size Oh well it didn't go well ,
I noted the name on the bomber was "Cyka Blyat".
S R ua-cam.com/video/bo5ZVe1LHxU/v-deo.html
I don't get it.
Слава богу, что обошлось без пожара. Лётчики целы - это главное. А технику починят, бывает во всех странах.
Плохо.так и надо.больше би такого.
voice behind scene: взлёт экипажа Шилова / takeoff of the Shilov (second name of crew comander) crew.
It was aborted takeoff
Of course not. Russian pilots call this plane an awl (шило).
Алкашилова
@@floks700 awl is TU22. Without M. A completely different plane.
Those pilots were extremely lucky to have lived after this disaster. I wonder why it never lifted off? It looked like they had plenty of speed to take off.
According to released informations, the pitot tube failed (frozen?) during takeoff roll, and without proper speed reading they decided to abort, because is uncontrollable without that data.
In any "normal" aircraft there are at least 2 most likely three independent pitot tubes and thus speed readings - speedometers. It is very unlikely that all three tubes fail at the same moment (they seem to have done so in AF 447 but this was a very different situation). My guess here would be (assuming pitot tubes were actually involved in this accident) that this was a failure of the pilot(s) to check speed readings obtained from back up pitot tubes and compare them with the readings from the failed one. In a "normal" aicrcraft all you need to do is flip a switch to set speed readings to the working pitots. But this requires fast thinking and if possible good CRM. Since this was not in winter - as the video shows - there is no mechanism for all pitots to freeze at the same moment, such as seemd to have happened in AF447. @@szennyvizcsatorna2483
"Are we there yet?"
no
Did they abort the takeoff and deploy the chutes, or was that accidental?
A great shame and one can only imagine how the pilot(s) felt - even if it was not their fault. Pleased no-one was hurt.
they all died
The pilots were most likely drunk...
Sent to Siberia for re-education. 😂
@@hammer-r Seriously? Good morning dude, Russia haven’t sent people to Siberia for 40 years.
@@sky_fl350 Yeah, Just ask them! 🙄
That aircraft must be built like a tank. No fuel spillage, no fire. Amazing. The question remains, why was the takeoff aborted?
Can only assume that he was rapidly approaching V1 and didn't have the air speed to lift off. Must have had some kind of power issue. Hard to tell for sure but it looks like he might have waited to long to abort. Appears the crew survived. Thank goodness there was no fire.
The speed sensor was fouled with water. The crew had no indicated speed. Unsure of how fast they were going, they rejected the take off.
Is it so hard to estimate the speed in daylight, that you have to crash the plane?
@@waltonwarrior7428 Why? Frying alive is quite fitting for katsaps...
@@acajutla ☝️👏
10 out of 10 for the cameraman, he held the plane in the frame all the way through. 2 out of 10 on video resolution.
Well, this was 5 years ago. Not everyone could afford high res.
Можно подробности про экипаж Шилова ? Давно ли летает на данном типе аппарата ? Давно ли служит в ВКС ? Успехи какие в учебе ?
Я понимаю когда гражданские хоронят 65 человек , потому что не могут определить скорость при наборе высоты . Но тут при разбеге ... Можно просто на глаз прикинуть сколько отметок фиксированного расстояния за секунду проносится и посчитать скорость . Наземные средства контроля не дают информации о скорости захода на посадку ??? Странные дела в авиации ...
Was this filmed with a potato?
Good to see a quick response from the airfield fire and rescue services.
Экономия на подготовке пилотов,должна быть экономной
К чему запятая?
No dash cam on this one?
Надо было взлетать без спидометра, набрать скорость побольше на взгляд, по опыту………😢
А ты сидел когда нибудь за штурвалом? У меня тоже был такой отказ и тоже прекращал взлет,на другом типе правда,но полосы хватило. Здесь же монстр! На глаз ничего не определишь. Если взлететь еще как то можно,то при заходе дров наломаешь точно слава богу все живы. Продолжил бы взлет,была бы катастрофа.
@@user-bd4nd9qq6f Мне лень искать , но у него кроме основного неверно ещё есть и пара дополнительных ПВД с своими УС .
было, есть и будет это в любой авиации, не зависимо от стран и пилотов!
Напоминает мне реальный случай Второй мировой войны: Увидев, что бомбардировщик B-17 был смертельно ранен, немецкий летчик-истребитель прекратил огонь по самолету и его экипажу. Немецкий пилот пролетел рядом с бомбардировщиком, узнал пилотов B-17 и продолжил сопровождать бомбардировщик над немецкой укрепленной территорией и мимо нее.
Вот статья из Вики:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Brown_and_Franz_Stigler_incident
Reminds me of a true WWII incident: Seeing that a B-17 bomber was mortally wounded, a German fighter pilot ceased fire on the plane and it's crew. The German pilot flew along side the bomber, acknowleged the B-17 pilots and proceeded to escort the bomber over and past German fortified territory.
Here is the article from Wiki:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Brown_and_Franz_Stigler_incident
Cheers Comrade.
Ladna 👍
Да помню как при полной заправке с двумя ракетами они в жару от последней плиты отрываются смотреть страшно
Только у вас русских рукожопов слишком часто бывает таких случаев - вы полные рекордсмены!!! :)))))
@@user-uo5vs6tr2u Я вот задаюсь вопросом - Почему в минобороне головой не подумают и аэродромы где их эксплуатируют не удлинят?!
А какой год, съёмки?
Lucky there was no fire. Was it bad instrumentation or was it actually too slow to lift off?
При выполнении взлёта с аэродрома Шайковка (Калужская область), в процессе разбега, из-за возникшей разницы показаний скорости у членов экипажа, КК принял решение об экстренном прекращении взлёта. Самолёт (RF-94233 красный) выкатился за пределы ВПП на 800 метров на грунт, подломив стойки шасси. Экипаж жив, самолёт восстановлению не подлежит.
МЛя... А технари перед вылетом что делали? Доложили видимо что борт готов? И на кого н-нную сумму повесили? Кто платить то за ущерб будет?
Glad to know that pilots were not injured there ;)
Ive watched it 5 times now, specifically for the exhaust. While the view is off angle, it truly looks like the starboard engine is the only one turning. Half thrust ends in no go.
I wonder if the brake chutes deployed accidentally/prematurely?
It's so sad to see damage to such a beautiful aircraft. It's amazing how robustly Russian/Soviet aircraft were constructed!
DAMN excuse me ! I FORGOT TO FEED THE CAT BEFORE LEAVING 😆
🤔
My gold fiches !!! 😱😱😱
Perfect reaction! Congratulation capitan!
Bullshit
Как будто без прибора не видно что скорость растёт!
А потом на посадку как он будет без указателя скорости содиться??? Вы прежде чем ляпнут подумайте.
WORST TIME TO REJECT TAKE OFF
Теперь там вообще ничего не показывает. Вообще в начале разбега обычно даже команду подают "скорость пошла". А если она не пошла, чего сразу не прервали? И ппошли ли они скорость принятия решения? Явно безопаснее было продолжить взлет.
OOOPSKI! Hopefully no one was seriously injured or killed. Metal can be easily replaced, not pilots.
earth: *earths runs out of metal* Oh well i guess no more Tu-22M3 long rang bombers for you guys!
That is what I call a ground attack aircraft.
It attacked the ground immediately past the after end of the runway. They must have a superb weapon’s officer on-board! 💥
The Tu-22M3 is a magnificent beast!
A beast that roams the forest by the look of it!
Massive forward CG issue?
ZOUKA !!! Biliak Bolchémoï !
Radié vam tavaritchi !
Look at the heat coming from the exhausts. It looks like they lost one of their two engines just 2 seconds before releasing the parachute.
They were aborting the take off run
No. Off the throttles at that point
Da..Da..Da..Nah..Nah..Nahhhh
Damn...
Командира наверное, судили и заставили выплачивать материальный ущерб
So does anybody know if you can take off with the sensor not functioning properly please let me know I think it would explain a whole lot about this crash he pulled the shoot way to far past the point of no return I think I would have at least tried to lift off . If the sensor would allow absolute and it looks like the runway is just too short for that plane unless it's a emergency just landing
"Lucky was built at People's Tractor Factory #12!" (Glad the crew survived.)
before saying they survived, I would wait they explain to Vladimir what happened ^^
Good one
Ему не хватало скорости полета, и он знал это, отсюда и парашют. Надеюсь, с ними все в порядке.
Тяжелее воздуха.😊
Was it trying to take off?
Pats on the back for the factory fuel tank welder.
Congratulations from Ukraine! What a good decision, captain.
Yeah, decision like a minute too late.
What year.
Goes to show you what a well built aircraft can survive...
меня всегда удивляло, ну неужели так трудно и дорого на всякий случай хотя-бы бульдозерави уровнять типа продолжение полосы ? ну ведь стоит это копейки, сберегли-бы самолет. эх (
+1
Ну да, это же не интересно было бы! А подумать о безопасности, на всякий случай, это не по нашему!
+2
А можно полосу километров 10 построить как во всем мире делают... Как так 3км во всем мире???
Если позволяет ландшафт, торцевые полосы безопасности выровнивают не менее, чем на триста метров, и не только бульдозером, но и грейдерами, а затем укатывают уплотнителями грунта.
В данном случае самолёт был слишком тяжёлым и решение о прекращении взлёта было принято слишком поздно, потому такие последствия. К сведению, максимальный взлетный вес этого типа ла превышает 120 тонн.
В ролике видно, что за торцом ВПП ровный участок, как и положено. Левая стойка подломилась от ударов о стойки светотехнического оборудования, а левая потому, что пилот пытался уклониться вправо от столкновения с курсовым маяком на оси ВПП, в ролике видна антенна, не уверен, но вероятно это она.
При отсутствии различного оборудования за торцом, ЛА остался бы абсооютно цел.
И такое бывает, что же тут поделать. Не падают те, кто не летает!
Так это даже не взлетел
Ему не даётся взлёт. Это был уже третий им разбитый самолёт.
That's one reason to conduct a performance accelerate check airspeed at a specific distance down the runway after starting the takeoff roll. This check distance is usually 1,000 to 2,000 feet (300 to 600 meters) down the runway and compares actual acceleration to that based on required aircraft performance to conditions. If the speed is less than that required, then the takeoff can be aborted early in the takeoff run.
I've seen quite a few videos where Russian planes use up all the runway and barely bite air, skimming tree tops as they climb. This Pilot In Command must have thought he could do it again because he waited until almost the last moment to deploy his drag cute.
You know the engineers didn't get much sleep following the incident..glad no one was injured.
Knowing Russian equipment that will be back in the air in no time. Glad nobody got killed.
Все лётчики живы ! Это главное !
Каждая жизнь стоит денег. Если бездарь угробил 100 млн долларов США, то надо понимать, что эти деньги не пошли в частности на оказание медпомощи кому то, и кто то умер от этого.
Жаль, что не закобзонились!
Ils ont coupé les gaz après V1 pour s'arrêter aussi loin ?
was that a speed camera at the end? points and a fine on their way mr pilotski
Stupid.
Полоса коротковата однако!!!
Страшно подумать что бы он предпринял если бы часы остановились
😂😂😂😂😂😂
А ты летал без указателя скорости?
@@user-ze7ek9pd2zи чо из за этого взлёт прекращать?ну пацаны вы даете
@@user-ze7ek9pd2zБез основных и резервных сразу?😂
@@user-iw3tn1vp2w думаешь так не бывает?
That didn't look good, but maybe survivable! God Bless crew!
Looks like a great land craft
Можем повторить!🤣🤣🤣