Lessons from Ashura: The Martyrdom of Al-Husayn | Imam Tom Facchine
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 сер 2023
- You can support our work on Patreon:
/ uticamasjid
For Masjid Contributions ↓
PayPal: uticamasjid@gmail.com
Cashapp: $uticamasjid
Instagram: / uticamasjid
Ali (ra), Hassan(ra), and Husayn (ra) are all free from the exaggeration of the rafidha. May Allah have mercy on them and unite us with them along with Prophet Mohammed (saws) and the companions as a whole.
What exaggeration is that?
Instead of focusing on the lecture youre more worried about hating on rafidha.
Ali is the judge on the day of judgment, an imaam that is alive is are aware of every atom in creation, etc.
Jazak Allah Khayran Imam Tom for standing for the occasion and attempting to educate Muslims specifically the youth of their history. Many imams shy away from even mentioning Ashoraa so that they do not have to bring up the memory of Hussain and the tragedy that hit the ummah the consequences of which we continue to struggle with until today.
ماشاء الله لا قوةالا بالله
Your khutba❤ such a brief explanation…to the point.
Your khitab and words choosen on this topic was like a poetry…
May Allaha SWT give you immense reward and raise your knowledge and your status in this world and world hereafter…Ameen ya rabbul aalameen
JazakALLAH ya Imam Tom. May Allah give you long, healthy, and prosperous life that you will be of benefit to the muslim ummah.
Ammeen
Ameen Thummah Ameen!
[𝐃𝐡𝐢𝐤𝐫] Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "Whoever says, 'Subhan Allah wa bihamdihi,' one hundred times a day, will be forgiven all his sins even if they were as much as the foam of the sea.
Sahih al-Bukhari 6405
Very informative jazaka Allah khayran
JazakALLAH Khairan Katheera Jannatulfirdaus Aameen YARABB
I was reluctant watching the channel fearing it might be Shia. Alhamdulillah no stench of that. Will watch on to see if the preachings are safe at other levels.
Sadly for many years Muslims have been forbidden from studying their own history by the kings who claimed to be khilafa when they were merely kings who ran dynasties. Sadly this imam took a little from here and a little from there to create his argument. Sahih books , Katheer, snd many other books are available for all these days so why so little research is done! So sad!!
As Salamu Alaykum,
In my country, there are majlis where we learn about this part of history ever first 10 days of Muharram.
It was more than just transition from democratic election to dynasties.
If Yazid was a good Muslim, the companions would have accomodate him, but he had a number of vices that were simply incompatible with Islam.
Someone with his behaviours and penchants was not fitted to become the Caliphe of the Muslim Ummah, for he failed the test of the Islamic traits needed in a Islamic leader.
I think what made the Shi'a even more extreme in their claims was that for a number of years Hazrat Ali Radi Allahu Anhu and his family, the Ahle Bait were bring reviled from the pulpit of every Jumu'ah in Syria, under Marwan.
We are from tge Ahle Sunnah Wal Jama'at we neither fall in the extreme of the shi'ite nor the extreme of those who tortured and murdered the Ahle bai't, but rather tread on the middle path.
Today, many Wahabbi are saying that Yazid was a sahabi and a good Muslim, we refute that claim!
Well said bro
Stop this nonsense wahabi, wahabis are ahl ul sunna too, yazid was a companion being a companion of the Prophet is still gonna maje you better than any other muslim
Well done. U are a Sunni with a good unbiased heart
@@ahmed.aljelali Wahabbis are the followers of those biddati, fassiq Muhammad Abdul Wahhab, Ibn Baaz, Fawzan, and the fitnah-inducer clockmaker who created a lot of mess in the standardisation system of hadith to lure the ignorant and their own students of lies.
They will tell ignorants and converts that they are not mischief creators but are peacemakers.
They inspire movements like ISIS, etc..
No! They are NOT of the Ahle Sunnah Wal Jama'at, they are only claiming this now when they see people discovering their true colours, but they used to call themselves Tawhiid or Salafi, when in fact they are traitors who worked with the British empire and other colonisers to destroy the Ottoman Empire.
Their reality is exposed in Surah Baqarah and in Sahih Mutawwathir hadith from our Rassulullah Swalalahu Alayhi Was Salaam.
SHAME!!!
@@ahmed.aljelali Define a sahabi and check the list whether Yazid was a sahabi?
Would you care to hear that Isa on His return has clarified this issue and indeed United the hearts on all ends ?
With all respect, I think using the word Rebellion, to describe Hussein's RA actions and the possible actions of Hassan's RA actions and Aisha's RA actions, is problematic. Did they give Baya'a before doing those actions? What was their intentions? I think we should be more careful when addressing the grandchildren and the wife of the prophet SAW.
This guy did not do his research properly and is minimizing what actually hairbrush at Karbala.
Not at all. 2 years ago I gave an Ashura khutbah with much more detail about the events of that day. I had a different purpose with this khutbah, more of a birds-eye-view. All of my research is taken from the sahih hadith and Imam Al-Dhahabi's Siyar Alaam al-Nubalaa. Now, if it contradicts your preferred narrative of what happened, that's another story.
-Imam Tom
@@UTICAMASJID Dear Imam Tom, I have been following you for a while now.
I know you strive hard to give the best of yourself and your knowledge in your qutbah's.
I understand you would choose a book recommended by liars like Al Uthaimeen because you were taught by them.
I would sincerely from the bottom of my heart with great respect for you and for everything you are doing in terms of dawah recommend you to look for books that are earlier.
And, also to avoid reading the translations of the books or those published after the publishing houses have been bought with petro- dollars.
@@nl.dauhoowhat credentials do you have to levy a charge as serious as declaring Shk Ibn Uthaimeen to be a liar? without citing any academic evidence or sources. the Imam told you his sources, now the burden of proof is on YOU to provide academic counter points. and don’t say “just go look it up” because all that does it show that you’re not coming from a place of honesty
The killing of Husayn is not part of Islamic Revelaion, because it happened after Wahy.
I as a Muslim see this event as part of history, but not as part of Wahy.
Just think about this, you will be amazed .....
How do these shiaii get these "Hadith" in books like al kafi where they quote the imams or essentially the extended family of the prophet as justifying immamia and their infalliblilty and claims to lead the muslim ummah ?
@@salmaz315 do the shia have any authentic Hadith even if those are from the prophets family and should thus be given weight or are they all lies? For example the other book they have najahul balagh
@globalislamicreminder
They don't even have science of hadith, there is no dhaiif hadith or sahih every hadith found in their books they accept
Yazid is given the benefit of doubt. Imam Hasan (raa) is praised in such a way as to reflectively criticize Imam Husayn (raa) as a transgressor and rebel.
That's not true, go back and listen again.
@@UTICAMASJID Please, for the benefit of your own soul and out of sisterly love for you, I am pleading with you do not let yourself be instrumentalise by wahhabism.
Ibliss came from Nadj and plotted with the Meccan on killing our Rassulullah Swalalahu Alayhi Was Salaam.
There is a famous hadith that the horn of satan will raise from Nadj.
I give you the benefit of the doubt and your intentions are good my brother. But is it possible that we do not realize the import of what we say sometimes.
It is said Yazid poked the severed head of Imam Husain(ra) with a stick when it was presented to him. Let’s even say that narration is dubious. Is there any historical evidence that the generals or the soldier who killed the Ahl Bayt were punished in any way or form?
It is a well accepted fact that winners write and influence history. Could the Umayyad’s have influenced how Yazid and the events at Karbala unfolded are recorded.
Is it perceiveable that they may have manufactured Hadith in order to solidify their position?
It is also known that the Wahhabis in their hatred of Shias are big Umayyad supporters and unfortunately your source of knowledge is Madinah University. A petro dollar funded known disseminator of a fringe doctrine throughout the Muslim world. That is no fault of yours, it’s the most welcoming and accessible source and many bright young western converts are flocking there with their sincere desire to learn.
I think the evil that shias has followed is the same to the followers of jesus. They overpraised him to the extent of worshipping until the later generation completely considered him as god. Allah knows best