Magnetron, How does it work?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,1 тис.

  • @jeffjenner5030
    @jeffjenner5030 3 роки тому +575

    So what you are saying is , you have this special circular flute and instead of blowing air across it you are blowing a stream of electrons over it and the music it gives off will cook your chicken

    • @robinwells8879
      @robinwells8879 3 роки тому +38

      Beautiful 😂

    • @SmipWhip
      @SmipWhip 3 роки тому +22

      essentially

    • @ichoppabroccoli3670
      @ichoppabroccoli3670 3 роки тому +12

      Well, between the flute and donkey analogies I totally get this! When I use the microwave I always say I'm "nuking" my food. Been right all along. Thanks!☢

    • @johnnycash4034
      @johnnycash4034 3 роки тому +4

      Genius

    • @TheZenytram
      @TheZenytram 3 роки тому

      obviously

  • @АнтонАлександрин-ч8х
    @АнтонАлександрин-ч8х 4 роки тому +278

    The key principle of the magnetron remained unmentioned. The electrons tramsmit their potential energy to the high-frequency electric field thus increasing its power. Without cavities and HF-field electrons move by trochoidal trajectories around the cathode and never reach the anode. But in presence of HF-field electrons interact with it, losing their speed and moving closer to anode. This leads to decreasing of electrons' potential energy (which is determined by their distance from the anode). This energy is transferred to the electromagnetic field.

    • @revatis2571
      @revatis2571 4 роки тому +3

      This might be silly question but can u explain that how in such cases electron's potential energy is determined by its anode from anode?
      why when velocity of electron decreases potential energy decreases?
      Thank you

    • @martinschwaikert5433
      @martinschwaikert5433 4 роки тому +7

      @@revatis2571 I suppose he meant kinetic energy.

    • @muhammedsalihp3344
      @muhammedsalihp3344 4 роки тому +3

      Isn't it KE

    • @Adolf0is0winner
      @Adolf0is0winner 4 роки тому +2

      Thank you for bringing our attention to missed details . But Maxwell states that all charged particles have electric fields which in turn generates the magnetic field perpendicular to it . The HF would mean electric fields turning positive and negative very rapidly . The moving particles would have their own fields . The fields are waves . There would be waves interaction. The waves would have two dimensions . Place the rest of information in reply to further my understanding

    • @1272-f9v
      @1272-f9v 3 роки тому +1

      ​@@Adolf0is0winner The waves are always, difference in density between different particles, no matter what the environment is... in an environment of different particle sizes, it is possible to generate waves of different sizes by compressing some of the particles. Empty environment, without any particles, does not exist. All smallest charged and uncharged particles are electric fields in different densities. Density of the particle electric field determines of what atom do we have.

  • @doctorweile
    @doctorweile 4 роки тому +94

    I find the entire idea/concept quite facinating. Who would ever have thought of this - and even like 80 years ago?

    • @gwcoty0715
      @gwcoty0715 2 роки тому +16

      We were smarter back then

    • @deflategate1297
      @deflategate1297 2 роки тому +7

      Pretty sure the powers that be do not want us to be all smart

    • @frommarkham424
      @frommarkham424 Рік тому

      @@gwcoty0715 No there were always dumb and stupid humans

    • @explicitreverberation9826
      @explicitreverberation9826 Рік тому +1

      Only ETS. Basically every major breakthrough .

    • @numbr6
      @numbr6 Рік тому

      People disparate to win a world war? The UK got seriously pounded by Germany.

  • @MystakeSeGueMun
    @MystakeSeGueMun 4 роки тому +635

    I think it's the best video explaining the basics of a magnetron here in UA-cam. Congratulations

    • @BlueprintScience
      @BlueprintScience 4 роки тому +14

      Hey, take that back!

    • @CodyAardema
      @CodyAardema 4 роки тому +7

      Yeah. Blueprint did it better.

    • @robertw1871
      @robertw1871 4 роки тому +6

      It’s not bad for a simple overview, how exactly all this happens is rather more complex than it seems, quite a bit of pretty advanced physics going on... one thing left out more or less is the oscillating is in both the electric and magnetic feilds, it seems to focus mainly on the electric feild... still not bad for someone who just wants to know roughly how they work without actually knowing much of anything about how they work in reality...

    • @MeteCanKarahasan
      @MeteCanKarahasan 4 роки тому +4

      I feel like this carrot is beyond my reach...

    • @BarriosGroupie
      @BarriosGroupie 3 роки тому

      My exact thoughts, it deserves an award for outstanding research and production. I also love the historical bit at the end mentioning how the technology was little understood in the beginning. Supposedly, American scientists were initially amazed at how such a small device could create so much power.

  • @NoosaHeads
    @NoosaHeads 4 роки тому +86

    And I have an extreme difficulty in understanding it too. I'm glad that the US scientists and I are similarly confused.

    • @airb1976
      @airb1976 3 роки тому +6

      That is why other scientists outside us exists

    • @Daniel-qs8ec
      @Daniel-qs8ec 3 роки тому +3

      @@airb1976 almost everything is invented by scientists outside the US.. and the things that ARE invented in the US, are by foreign scientists living in america lol

    • @airb1976
      @airb1976 3 роки тому

      @@Daniel-qs8ec i know that

    • @abdallagurashi9566
      @abdallagurashi9566 4 місяці тому

      😂😂😂😂😂

  • @marshallzingkhai889
    @marshallzingkhai889 4 роки тому +138

    Its amazing how someone else could come up with a technology like this. "Some" human beings are seriously intelligent.

    • @ewthmatth
      @ewthmatth 4 роки тому +3

      What do you mean someone "else"?

    • @marshallzingkhai889
      @marshallzingkhai889 4 роки тому +14

      @@ewthmatth Not all billions of these people are that smart/intelligent.

    • @GoldSrc_
      @GoldSrc_ 4 роки тому +34

      All it takes is understand how the laws that rule this universe work, but not everyone in this world can.
      Indeed it's amazing how a brain that was only used to hunt and gather food to survive, is able to be pushed and figure out how this universe works.
      And then we have the bulk of idiots who believe in a flat earth and other nonsense.
      But oh well, at least those idiots are not in charge of developing new technologies and medicine.

    • @thepope2412
      @thepope2412 4 роки тому +11

      Without those “idiots” those “smart” people wouldn’t have the resources to produce technology like this. What’s more amazing is the economics that makes it possible.

    • @thepope2412
      @thepope2412 4 роки тому +1

      Thomas wow that’s the dumbest thing I’ve seen today

  • @1.4142
    @1.4142 3 роки тому +7

    Instructions unclear, my electricity is now powered by donkeys with carrots attached to their heads.

  • @ThomasFarquhar2
    @ThomasFarquhar2 4 роки тому +17

    This guy is still doing what I knew him for about 4 years ago. Keep doing this man, we will always need videos like this

  • @Nmdixon-cu7vm
    @Nmdixon-cu7vm 4 роки тому +409

    I need my coffee. I thought that title said “what is megatron and how does he work.”

    • @zensoredparagonbytes3985
      @zensoredparagonbytes3985 4 роки тому +6

      😂😂😂same here. I was about to post something similar

    • @rickdeckard1075
      @rickdeckard1075 4 роки тому +3

      funny. now if only ppl understood the deliberate planned socio-economic manipulations that led to the world wars as easily as this video assumes for magnetrons...
      also, klystrons were the competing design...

    • @BlueprintScience
      @BlueprintScience 4 роки тому +2

      Yeah, I wonder where that winner of a title could've come from...

    • @NPRBEST
      @NPRBEST 4 роки тому +4

      Title is correct. It explains the physics behind the device. And of course, its usage.

    • @HydraSR
      @HydraSR 4 роки тому +3

      You can make an instant coffee with a magnetron. Just make sure that your microwave oven is not a Decepticon hiding in your apartment.

  • @infatum9
    @infatum9 4 роки тому +177

    Thanks. Since detecting an object requires a return wave propagation from a reflected object it would be nice to hear how the return wave gets processed.

    • @_sunsor
      @_sunsor 4 роки тому +51

      The short version: return wave has predictable frequency, big antenna with special shape points toward where reflection should be coming from, given speed of light thru air, measure time between outgoing pulse and incoming pulse to measure distance. Size of object corresponds to strength of reflected signal.

    • @busimagen
      @busimagen 4 роки тому +37

      adding to sunsor comment above : S send pulse, R = return pulse
      S______________R__ far
      S_____R___________ near
      Simple math on how long it takes to receive the return pulse will tell you distance. The pulse is directional, and if you rotate the sending antenna, the turning of the antenna is much much slower than the speed of light, so the return pulse will come back before the antenna has turned much (so, it is basically still pointing in the same direction). So, if you receive more than 1 return pulse, you have more than 1 contact in that direction. This makes it easy to use a cathode ray tube (the kind one would use for an old oscilloscope) to plot the signal. All the CRT needs to do is scan in the same direction that the antenna is pointing, and shoot electrons any time a return signal is detected, and the time it takes for the electron beam to make one scan to the edge of the screen removed the need to actually do any math (it just comes out as a result of the time it takes to trace/not-trace the line). If you do it digitally, though, then you actually have to do a bunch of processing before you can display anything. Using a CRT is thus a much much simpler process (just scan a line from center to edge in the same direction as the sending antenna, shoot electrons when there is a return signal received), adjust scan line speed to adjust zoom (slower scan line speed gives further out zoom; faster gives closer in zoom).

    • @infatum9
      @infatum9 4 роки тому +13

      @@busimagen thanks for expanding. I presume it is almost the same principle as for ultrasonic sensor in Arduino, with a difference in speed, that is instead of the speed of sound 340 m/s one has speed of light 300 000 km/s. And as you pointed out, the speed of light/radio wave is way faster than the speed of rotating radar. I thought the video could have gone into these details as well, but for some, I guess, it would be over the head.

    • @LoanwordEggcorn
      @LoanwordEggcorn 4 роки тому +3

      @@infatum9 Yes, same idea with ultrasonic sensor, though the technology of the generating the wave and its detection are different.
      The video talks only about the Cavity Magnetron, and that's a good thing to limit the scope of the topic. Use in radar would be a different topic.

    • @burnerjack01
      @burnerjack01 4 роки тому +8

      @@busimagen Excellent explanation. Now, about those phased array, multi frequency critters...

  • @ihtsarl9115
    @ihtsarl9115 3 роки тому +7

    Well explained ! The Brits were pioneers in elecron physics thanks to the British scientist J. J. Thompson who discovered the electron at that era .

  • @williamlaudeman7157
    @williamlaudeman7157 3 роки тому +4

    I was a RADAR and Radio repair student at the Army Signal School in 1953 and went on to become an instructor at the Ordnance Guided Missile School at Redstone Arsenal.
    As a result of being in (what was then) the longest school program in the Army, we were denied advancement in rank for nearly two years, still pulling KP while others were being promoted to cpl or sgt. It was this stupid situation that led to the Army losing the missile technology race and the formation of NASA.

  • @KeystoneScience
    @KeystoneScience 3 роки тому +3

    This video is so great, with fantastic visualization and explanation.

  • @4pharaoh
    @4pharaoh 13 днів тому

    You have to appreciate the pure genius of the man who came up with this.

  • @edwardbartolo6382
    @edwardbartolo6382 4 роки тому +6

    Brilliantly and accurately explained! You use Physics to explain the working principles of the magnetron unlike others who use analogies that have nothing to do with Physics.

  • @BritishBeachcomber
    @BritishBeachcomber 2 роки тому +7

    Good to hear us Brits getting credit for another world changing invention 👍👍

  • @nickmartin3647
    @nickmartin3647 2 роки тому +4

    How did someone even figure this out?

  • @josephmarsh8235
    @josephmarsh8235 4 роки тому +32

    This was quite interesting, especially for how I've learned about how these things work that I've seen

  • @risingredstone5949
    @risingredstone5949 3 роки тому +78

    I assure you, I still dont understand it.

    • @rule1dontgosplat
      @rule1dontgosplat 6 місяців тому +3

      haha. i watch this like once a year and keep forgetting it

    • @woody442
      @woody442 3 місяці тому +2

      Donkeys and carrots, isn't it?

    • @paulfalke6227
      @paulfalke6227 Місяць тому

      Don't worry. You can use something without understand it (completely), even improve it. Fun fact: look up Barkhausen-Kurz Schwingung or Elektronentanz (Barkhausen-Kurz oscillation or electron dance).

    • @KevinSmith-yo8qb
      @KevinSmith-yo8qb 18 днів тому

      Never blown a stream of air across an open bottle?

  • @matgggg55
    @matgggg55 3 роки тому +2

    Wow amazing I’m fourth year engineering student and have never heard a magnetron explained soo simply

  • @Mrbobinge
    @Mrbobinge Рік тому +4

    Often wondered how, in those days, they generated high frequencies at such high power. Switching, with thermionic valves and surrounding LC drag, didn't seem possible.
    Lesics explanation was so clear. Thanks.

    • @ntal5859
      @ntal5859 Рік тому +1

      Up until recently (20yrs) valves were the go to choice for high frequency high power like 50kw radio station final output stages... Mind you it took days to get to operating temperature IE if you don't thermal cycle em right you will crack them.

    • @richardvernon317
      @richardvernon317 Рік тому +1

      LC drag was a massive problem with the Receiver. Triode and Diode Mixers were next to useless. It lead to the development of Silicon Crystal Diode and the start of semi-conductor tech (once they got the Silicon pure enough to do it in 1942).

  • @edwaggoner7403
    @edwaggoner7403 3 роки тому +2

    Studied this and wave propagation theory way back in 68, while learning about radars I would be working on.
    The surface radar search radar had a magnetron with 200kw transmitted power using a waveguide.
    This brought back memories.

    • @ntal5859
      @ntal5859 Рік тому +1

      Yet the FCC will crack down on a poor ham operator with 10 watts ..lol

    • @edwaggoner7403
      @edwaggoner7403 Рік тому

      @@ntal5859
      The 200kw from the radar was legal. My larger radar at over 250kw was legal also but I had to wait until my ship was 20+ miles at sea to radiate that one.

  • @TheRepublicOfYhonai
    @TheRepublicOfYhonai 3 роки тому +17

    my granddad was involved in the first development of these systems, we only found out relatively recently since these projects were surrounded with secrecy

  • @peterfelstead1170
    @peterfelstead1170 Рік тому +2

    I used to make magnetrons in a factory @ Marconi. The filament was slightly offset from the centre. And we're pulsed magnetrons to give thousands of watts for radar. Looks exactly the same as a microwave magnetron.

  • @skyhop
    @skyhop 3 роки тому +26

    I've always felt the magnetron's invention was generations ahead of its time, and massively out of place for the time period it came from.

    • @petersellers9219
      @petersellers9219 3 роки тому +5

      Well, it came from Britain who led the world in electronics at the time

    • @manuelpiston
      @manuelpiston 3 роки тому

      Radars don't use them anymore

    • @janthurman9894
      @janthurman9894 3 роки тому +4

      @@manuelpiston that's not true. I am a magnetron technician and we make and sell them

    • @manuelpiston
      @manuelpiston 3 роки тому +2

      @@janthurman9894 Not the ones I work on. They use amplifiers instead of magnetrons.

    • @ic7481
      @ic7481 2 роки тому +1

      @@manuelpiston An amplifier doesn't emit microwaves

  • @bewstre
    @bewstre 4 місяці тому +1

    Great video! The animations, info, pace, and length were all spot-on. Subscribed!

  • @VickyGhadage
    @VickyGhadage 4 роки тому +48

    Interesting, easy way to understand concept.
    Keep making videos like that.

  • @MS-cj8uw
    @MS-cj8uw 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you .... what a genius step of the history of humanity

  • @Lesjaye
    @Lesjaye 4 роки тому +17

    Best explanation I’ve seen so far. Amazing that anyone could think this device up!

    • @johnedwards1685
      @johnedwards1685 4 роки тому +3

      An analogy of a magnetron is a whistle like that which a football referee would use. Think of the metal body of the whistle as a single tuned cavity (tuned to the pitch of the whistle). When you apply power to the cavity by blowing hard into the whistle, the cavity oscillates at its tuned pitch producing a loud noise very efficiently. The output (in this case noise) is transmitted via a port to the outside world.
      A magnetron is similarly a tuned cavity (actually a ring of cavities), and high voltage, high current provides the power. The magnetron output is a single frequency just like a whistle but at a very much higher pitch. That output is transmitted to the outside world by a waveguide (pipe). An electric whistle.

    • @brassj67
      @brassj67 4 роки тому +1

      Knowing what I know now, it seems so obvious. The genius part was to get the electrons to loop around unlike a normal vacuum tube where the electrons travel in a straight line. TV cathode ray tubes use the same principle but with electro magnets to bend the election beam to the correct part of the phosphor coated screen through a fine mesh mask. This uses very strong permanent magnets to cause the electrons to loop out then back in just like solar flares on the sun

    • @nata64
      @nata64 4 роки тому

      Jesus loves you

    • @organicfarm5524
      @organicfarm5524 2 роки тому

      Believe me, physicists and electrical engineers are the special breeds of superhuman intelligence.

  • @J_Lag
    @J_Lag 4 роки тому +2

    The video animation and illustrations were awesome; better than a text book.

  • @Admiralty86
    @Admiralty86 3 роки тому +3

    "and now you understand"
    I do? I'm flattered 😽

  • @edison8309
    @edison8309 4 роки тому +2

    The explai in this video is just beautiul. I've been looking this explain for one month and finally got this.

  • @rubes3927
    @rubes3927 4 роки тому +13

    I love how they narrate these videos like an alien speaking to humans for the first time 😂😂 it actually work perfectly for these style of educational videos hahaha

  • @alirezanabavian771
    @alirezanabavian771 Рік тому

    Bravo the most beautiful and meaningful explanation I have ever seen...I struggled for so long to understand the physics behind it and just now I've had my eureka moment..thank you so much your nice work has expanded my knowledge a bit more
    .

  • @LoanwordEggcorn
    @LoanwordEggcorn 4 роки тому +8

    Excellently clear explanation of how a Cavity Magnetron works. Thanks for making and sharing!
    The physics is only simple once it's explained. I'm sure it was difficult to come up with.

  • @acmefixer1
    @acmefixer1 3 роки тому +7

    Robert Buderi wrote a book about Radar, "The Invention That Won The War". It featured the magnetron which made it possible to output thousands of watts at more than a Gigahertz. Some Radars were at 10 GHz. The Radar I worked on put out 0.5 or 5 megawatts peak.

    • @BasementEngineer
      @BasementEngineer 2 роки тому

      As everything else from the English language media about Germany and WW I & II, ..."The Invention That Won The War"... is another baseless exaggeration. Radar had also been developed by the Germans, and the very high frequency type was much more precise that what the British could muster. Wikipedia is reasonably fair on this.

    • @georgebishop4941
      @georgebishop4941 Рік тому

      @@BasementEngineer Hilarious and baseless rubbish the Cavity Magnetron was invented by the British and exchanged with the Americans for their productive assistance in manufacturing for WW2. Along with many other cutting edge technologies like the Frank Whittle Jet Engine and the all but proven theory that an atomic bomb was feasible...Just stop talking nonsense and read up on the Tizard Mission. you're wrong DEAL WITH IT.

    • @georgebishop4941
      @georgebishop4941 Рік тому +1

      @@BasementEngineer Face it - chain home radar and similar designs were used all around the world inclusing the US Navy but the Cavity Magnetron was AMAZING and it was invented by the British.

    • @georgebishop4941
      @georgebishop4941 Рік тому

      @BasementEngineer - German RADAR was nothing compared to the increase in power by the tiny Cavity Magnetron that was housed in panes and used to detect enemy aircraft and submarines. You have ZERO evidence proving your nonsense.

    • @BasementEngineer
      @BasementEngineer Рік тому +1

      @@georgebishop4941 Agree with your last statement.
      But the idea that you could cook with microwaves of the right frequency, and also use them to disinfect clothing, is of German origin.

  • @andyash5675
    @andyash5675 20 днів тому

    The cavity resonator explanation part is particularly good.

  • @ussling
    @ussling 4 роки тому +9

    Yet back in the day, I was able to program the clock on my VCR.

  • @satishdave246
    @satishdave246 4 роки тому +1

    Explained beautifully in short, it has a very complicated Math behind the Design

  • @NPRBEST
    @NPRBEST 4 роки тому +3

    The video is very informative. Animations are so nice and effective that it makes the concept extremely easy to understand. Thanks a lot for uploading this video. It really takes a lot of time to make this kind of animation videos.

  • @runforitman
    @runforitman 2 роки тому

    I keep coming back to this video every now and then
    when I see a cavity magnetron mentioned, and cant remember how they work

  • @Jurkosvk
    @Jurkosvk 4 роки тому +9

    that ending was nice :D one of the most complicated technologies :D

    • @zazkegirotron
      @zazkegirotron 4 роки тому +2

      @@tbird-z1r I don't. But this video gives a ton of insight in a really short time.

    • @omniyambot9876
      @omniyambot9876 4 роки тому +1

      because Americans have a hard time understanding it

    • @JimBob1937
      @JimBob1937 13 днів тому

      @@omniyambot9876 , likely not true, but makes the viewers feel good about learning. You should be able to do that though without putting others down.

  • @LRV-TECH
    @LRV-TECH 3 роки тому +1

    The magnetron with an anode in which there were cavities around the circumference was invented in the USSR in 1936. The British simply used this prototype to speed up and improve the Radar, while in the USSR they did not know what to do with this toy. (Моurоmtsееff J. Е. Proc. Natl.-Electr. Conf., 1945, № 33, p. 229 - 233.)

    • @richardvernon317
      @richardvernon317 3 роки тому

      There were lots of different designs of Magnetron before Randell and Boot made this version in early 1940. The Soviet one was very low power (as was everybody else's (300-400 watts peak power)) and couldn't be used as a practical radar transmitter. In fact, the big problem was the Klystron produced more power without use of a huge magnet. The big difference between the Randell and Boot Magnetron and everybody else's was they were not radio engineers, but Physicists and unlike all the other Mangeton inventors who built their devices much like the Thermionic Valves of the day with thin walled Anodes encased in glass tubes, the British pair made the Anode the case of the Valve out of a block of copper. The British built their device before the Soviet one was patented. The other big problem with the other magnetrons were they didn't work for very long before the cathode burnt out. The problem was that the magnetic field forced electrons to slam back into the Cathode which over heated it. The French came up with a solution that overcame part of the problem, but it was a Brit at GEC who took the French solution, added an improvement of his own and embodied it into Randell and Boot's original design. This Magnetron could kick out 15 Kilowatts peak power and actually work for a reasonable life span and was the one given to the USA.

  • @shodanxx
    @shodanxx 3 роки тому +11

    0:16 cheerful music as the bombs drop

  • @mitcherito1
    @mitcherito1 5 місяців тому

    Me and my dad took apart a microwave this weekend (after discharging the massive capacitor of course) and the magnetron is sitting right next to me. Now I know how this crazy looking box works!

  • @marcelo55869
    @marcelo55869 4 роки тому +4

    Optimus Prime: The Decepticons devised a new attack, Autobots, roll out!!
    Megatron: That's my cousin Magnetron chilling out... It's not his fault!

  • @billallen275
    @billallen275 2 роки тому +1

    Well, at least for the 1940s technology. Excellent video. The cavities by their nature have an inherent capacitance and inductance so when the electrons go spiraling by it makes perfect sense that it excites the resonance which is then extracted and fed to the waveguide.

  • @xaiano794
    @xaiano794 4 роки тому +5

    I genuinely thought this said 'Megatron'
    I was looking forward to transformers info.

    • @pedrofellipe8028
      @pedrofellipe8028 3 роки тому +1

      funny enough, the magnetron needs high voltage to work, which is generated using a transformer

  • @JohannY2
    @JohannY2 4 роки тому +1

    One of your most brilliant explanations for such a complex concept.

  • @harshprajapati763
    @harshprajapati763 4 роки тому +5

    You done great job. very easily explain. And my little suggestion is Put some mathematics also , If you want .

  • @Anonimousxz
    @Anonimousxz 4 роки тому +1

    I finally understood how the microwave works !!!
    Thank you!!!
    Greetings from brazil, i give you my like!!

  • @aux1z11
    @aux1z11 4 роки тому +8

    I'm going to go use my magnetron to heat up my coffee, hold on I'll be right back

    • @natzuft
      @natzuft 4 роки тому

      I don't drink coffee, I take tea my dear

    • @Nexalian_Gamer
      @Nexalian_Gamer 4 роки тому +1

      Well did you get your coffee?

  • @gpcrawford8353
    @gpcrawford8353 3 роки тому +1

    During the war a test flight perfecting radar crashed killing all the crew running it. One of these was Alan Dower Blumlein who prior to the war was associated with audio recording and devised the method of stereophonic recording on the two sidewalls of a record groove. This crash was kept most secret for 6 months and a team under Bernard Lovell later of Jodrell bank radio telescope was sent to recover any remains of the radar.

  • @BlueprintScience
    @BlueprintScience 4 роки тому +6

    Goading me out of retirement, eh!

  • @jayall00
    @jayall00 2 роки тому +2

    Does the magnetron require a vacuum to function, or is there any known magnetron that would work without one? Is there any way to produce microwaves at battery power (40-70volts) if a step up transformer is used (+ hf plasma), and without a vacuum? Or is a vacuum and high amperage required to produce any microwaves at all (even low energy ones)? From what I've researched there doesn't seem to be anything below the scale of microwave-oven magnetrons (which are huge, clunky and dangerous).

  • @aniketchanda9315
    @aniketchanda9315 4 роки тому +13

    Hey,
    Please explain how wireless charging works !

    • @vgamesx1
      @vgamesx1 4 роки тому +2

      Basically 0:53, it's just oscillations of magnetic energy.

    • @moeezraza9124
      @moeezraza9124 4 роки тому +6

      Wireless charger works on the principle of mutal induction

    • @DeoMachina
      @DeoMachina 4 роки тому +3

      Two coils close together can transmit electricity via induction! Magnetic waves produce current when they cross a conductor.

    • @digimon916
      @digimon916 4 роки тому

      Look up some video about wireless lighting LEDs with coils. The LED will light as both coils (coil with power and coil with LED) get into effective range

    • @AlexanderBukh
      @AlexanderBukh 4 роки тому +2

      same as 1:1 transformer, two isolated coils. one powers the another

  • @shiulybegum6058
    @shiulybegum6058 3 роки тому

    Most informative chaneel for those who are interested in electronics and physics.
    Thanks to the author for making highly informative videos.

  • @neilorourke71
    @neilorourke71 3 роки тому +2

    "This mean the technology you now understand-"
    WHOA let's not jump to any conclusions I have no idea wtf you just said

  • @leozendo3500
    @leozendo3500 4 роки тому

    I am rather confident it is the best explanation for microwave magnetrons on the internet.

  • @ytrew9717
    @ytrew9717 3 роки тому +4

    I don't get the antenna part, does it simply means that the whole things is simply used to create a powerful/quick go and back movement of electrons in the antenna? (I guess it couldn't be that otherwise we'd rather use a transistor).

    • @worldofelectricity4038
      @worldofelectricity4038 3 роки тому

      You can't use transistors to switch in literally gigahertz

    • @ytrew9717
      @ytrew9717 3 роки тому

      @@worldofelectricity4038 but some transitor produce THz waves with high power Eg: www.techexplorist.com/nanodevice-operates-10-times-faster-todays-fastest-transistors/31090/

    • @betolee4292
      @betolee4292 3 роки тому +1

      @@ytrew9717
      Explaining better his answer, you cant have high power transistors (usually mosfets) that have high switching frequencies. Usually, they are restricted to about 100kHz ceiling, due to loses in switching efficiency.

    • @ytrew9717
      @ytrew9717 3 роки тому

      @@betolee4292 that makes sense, the link I provided above says transistor could do it., but don't talk about efficiency.

    • @betolee4292
      @betolee4292 3 роки тому

      @@ytrew9717
      Yeah, in signal transistors the time to charge the transistor´s gate is very low, so it can work in these frequencies. For high-power electronics, transistors have high gate capacitance that doesn't allow efficient fast switching. This is one of the reasons that valved electronics music stuff is still used today and is far better than transistors.

  • @sillymesilly
    @sillymesilly 3 роки тому

    This explanation is way better than my physics textbook

  • @sonicycles
    @sonicycles 4 роки тому +6

    Can you explain in more detail about the anode cavities surrounding the cathode, how is this energy calculated ? what happens if you have more or less cavities, does the size of the magnetron affect the performance?

    • @alexlo7708
      @alexlo7708 4 роки тому

      It has so much content. To learn it , direcly find a microwaves theory textbook.

  • @Superkuh2
    @Superkuh2 11 місяців тому

    If you ever re-do this one you should explain cavity strapping to force proper phase.

  • @evanbrown6923
    @evanbrown6923 4 роки тому +4

    Good to know that they're "one of the most complicated engineering technologies." Now I don't feel like such a dumb ass. This video couldn't have come at a better time for me, I've been struggling with understanding this concept for the past couple days. Brilliant work!

  • @Paul-A01
    @Paul-A01 5 місяців тому

    Electrons ride on a merry go round and have so much fun they shout microwaves of enjoyment

  • @McCuneWindandSolar
    @McCuneWindandSolar 4 роки тому +3

    I wonder if you could take a magnetron and change it to transfer data.

    • @GoldSrc_
      @GoldSrc_ 4 роки тому +1

      Cellphone communications use microwaves, the only difference would be the amount of power.
      You really don't want to stand in front of a microwave beam of over 1000 watts of power, it wouldn't end well for you.
      Anything in the range of 300MHz and 300GHz are microwaves, under 300MHz is radio and above 300GHz is IR, visible light and all the way up to gamma rays.
      Just don't fuck around with microwave over magnetrons, or any other high power device lol.

    • @JimBob1937
      @JimBob1937 13 днів тому

      No, you can't. Magnetrons are passive resonant cavities. The frequency and phase behaviors are fixed, based on the physical dimensions and material. You'd likely instead want an amplifier, which can take a signal and amplify the power for transmission. High powered microwave transmissions are a thing, but as the other guy said, there are safety precautions when working with transmissions of that power range. Largely due to thermal effects.

  • @michaelg4888
    @michaelg4888 4 роки тому +2

    That was my favorite character in Transformers. Excellent video!

  • @fsmoura
    @fsmoura 4 роки тому +7

    6:14 Haha, take that, US!
    --UK

  • @sirtajali5841
    @sirtajali5841 4 роки тому

    You explain very well complicated tehnologyes

  • @cambrown5633
    @cambrown5633 4 роки тому +162

    "Americans couldn't understand it so it's one of the most complex technologies!"
    *European scientists spinning in their graves"

    • @antreaskonstantinou8585
      @antreaskonstantinou8585 4 роки тому +10

      Just imagine a body spining inside a coffin

    • @hyperhektor7733
      @hyperhektor7733 4 роки тому +6

      you mean they party in their graves , since its a compliment for them

    • @Engineer9736
      @Engineer9736 4 роки тому +7

      How much rpm do they spin at?

    • @hyperhektor7733
      @hyperhektor7733 4 роки тому +19

      @@Engineer9736 usually 220 m/s because its recommended by the regulatory body of the european union.

    • @tommothedog
      @tommothedog 4 роки тому +3

      *British

  • @ButchNews
    @ButchNews 2 роки тому

    Very good. Really good simple to the point for anyone with any really basic electronic knowledge.

  • @wikipediasnippet7231
    @wikipediasnippet7231 4 роки тому +7

    0:48 The 'i' button just takes you to the Learn Engineering Channel. Clear as mud.

  • @nycsimon2024
    @nycsimon2024 2 роки тому

    Thank you for the excellent graphical explanation.

  • @kaleidyscope86
    @kaleidyscope86 4 роки тому +149

    It's one the most complicated technologies ever because Americans had a difficult time understanding it?

    • @vejymonsta3006
      @vejymonsta3006 4 роки тому +30

      Yea, that was an odd comment.

    • @NecroAngelDeclaresWar
      @NecroAngelDeclaresWar 4 роки тому +14

      Imagine americans opening an avocado

    • @zealobiron
      @zealobiron 4 роки тому +1

      @Pavor in America we were taught it was the Jews. Go figure haha

    • @jafinch78
      @jafinch78 4 роки тому +1

      ​@@zealobiron I understand the issue was more economics for more resources (natural) and Germanification (some German work propaganda) of all of Europe and I guess the World since they were into Eugenics. Don't forget wasn't Hitler only... there were other Marxist with a range of Socialist Agendas with Franco, Mussolini and others. Jew's were the scapegoat and were also an issue with a cycle in basically jobs leaving the country and going east and even like now days to China... though I think then more like Eastern Europe and Middle East more-so... maybe Africa also. Figure Italy was developing Africa still, France was also and Spain and Portugal were still vested in South America.
      Technically, there are other Vacuum and Gas Tube "Tron" devices with the U.S., Great Britain, Germany and the Soviet Union leading developments regarding the specific ones. The Cavity Magnetron happened to be a scaled down system compared to the others since the others like cyclotrons and klystrons were huge.
      Eh, like most science, technology, math and engineering... there are subjects with subject matter experts and I'm sure there was a learning curve at first.
      Interesting how each side in WW2 would slowly advance their technologies so to not want the others to find out and use. I wonder what wasn't disclosed to this day? Solid State technology came out more at this era as well as more advanced logic methods also leading into transistor computers. ua-cam.com/video/GJCF-Ufapu8/v-deo.html
      There are other episodes worth searching for or finding from your library and watching.

    • @АлександрГорбунов-ш8ы
      @АлександрГорбунов-ш8ы 4 роки тому +1

      Well, that's true

  • @llamasama4458
    @llamasama4458 3 роки тому

    Love the animation of the plane stopping to drop bombs. 10/10 plane fizixs

  • @kurtlindner
    @kurtlindner 4 роки тому +171

    I'm guessing the American Scientists watched this for their explanation, hence their confusion.

    • @Kj16V
      @Kj16V 4 роки тому +11

      I thought it was a good explanation. Maybe because I'm not American :P

    • @pmarshall3130
      @pmarshall3130 4 роки тому +1

      Nether is the cavity magnetron

    • @ShaithMaster
      @ShaithMaster 4 роки тому

      @@Kj16V I'm American, I got it after one viewing.

    • @khakhananglastname745
      @khakhananglastname745 4 роки тому

      This video gave me an understanding from a theoretical perspective. Is there something incorrect about their explanation?

    • @notyou1877
      @notyou1877 4 роки тому

      Them Americans were not able to think outside the box.
      Thatk God they got better with time.

  • @Arrogan28
    @Arrogan28 4 роки тому

    Wel done. Very clear explanation and no wonder it is difficult to understand whoever came up with this design is clearly brilliant!

  • @mugiwaradarwin4504
    @mugiwaradarwin4504 Рік тому +5

    - Magnetron on standby.
    - Magnetic field commencing.
    - Need a little force?
    - Generators ready.
    - Point me in the right direction.
    - Shifting polarity.
    - Opposites attract!
    - We need no compass!
    - My power is irresistible.
    - Moving within range.
    - Reel them in!
    - This is a tow zone!
    - Coils powering up!
    - Let's bring them closer to us!
    - Maximum charge!
    - Enemy locked.
    - Coils powering up!
    - Maximum charge!
    - Enemy locked.

  • @鹿-r2g
    @鹿-r2g 3 роки тому +1

    the physics behind this device is just mind blowing. how do people come up this design ?

  • @irfanwafiq4409
    @irfanwafiq4409 4 роки тому +5

    hi, i saw your content but in different leangue in chanel "ilmu rekayasa", is it on your permission?

    • @MFazriNizar
      @MFazriNizar 4 роки тому +4

      Of course it is. "Ilmu Rekayasa" is basically the Bahasa-translated videos and voices version of the "Learning Engineering" channel.

    • @twostar-ii380
      @twostar-ii380 4 роки тому

      snitches get stitches

  • @Crystalheard
    @Crystalheard 3 роки тому +1

    Great vid! Though I am a radio engineer, I have been puzzled by magnetron for many years.😆

  • @rajpawar9343
    @rajpawar9343 4 роки тому +8

    This is the technology which leads to invention of microwave oven.

    • @KingOf7oooms
      @KingOf7oooms 4 роки тому +1

      Well not only the microwave oven, also the Lineal accelerator which is whitely used in many areas especially in medical for radiotherapy systems.

    • @davemwangi05
      @davemwangi05 4 роки тому

      @@KingOf7oooms is it whitely used in many areas? wow!

    • @KingOf7oooms
      @KingOf7oooms 4 роки тому

      Divad Ignawm sorry it is a typo mistake, obviously I meant widely :)

  • @colorx6030
    @colorx6030 7 місяців тому

    Holy crap, I have been getting some trouble understanding deeply LC oscillations (like its Bandwidth, Quality Factor, and stuff) but that's also just the basics?! Dang, EE sure is an advanced field. How exciting

  • @declansgamereview6523
    @declansgamereview6523 4 роки тому +5

    I got this recommendation as my son likes megatron from transformers

  • @jeecodetv
    @jeecodetv 4 роки тому

    Woow. What a beautiful nature of inductor. It helps me understood clearly its uses.

  • @pranjalvw2193
    @pranjalvw2193 4 роки тому +6

    Not interested,
    Tell me how does Optimus Prime coming back from dead?

  • @tomswoverland
    @tomswoverland 2 роки тому +2

    I worked on Hawk missile system in the army. We had a magnetron in one of the radar I fixed didn’t understand it then thanks for explaining it if it broke we put a new one in only happened once. Still don’t understand it but thanks for trying. I also had a radar with a stabilatron in it also didn’t understand that either replaced one of them also. I could fix them but didn’t understand a lot. 😀

  • @bharatkukreti8449
    @bharatkukreti8449 3 роки тому

    Very nicely explain the complicated technology..... thanks

  • @victoryfirst2878
    @victoryfirst2878 2 роки тому +1

    So magnetism increase the amount of time the electrons spend circulation around the space ?? Thanks

  • @santiagogomes2806
    @santiagogomes2806 4 роки тому

    I love your videos because i learn english and Engineering at the same time

  • @OmarOmar-cy9oc
    @OmarOmar-cy9oc 4 роки тому +1

    man, the understanding of LC circuit is driving me crazy, Whenever i take a step forward, i encounter an obstacle that takes me two steps back

    • @antoniomaglione4101
      @antoniomaglione4101 4 роки тому +1

      Need some formal study for understanding that, as it is not obvious, just like the theory of the filters. In particular, network analisys, and distributed constants network design, with all the associated math. The high-end of electronic engineering.

  • @reviewothers6244
    @reviewothers6244 4 роки тому

    superb analysis and a complicated thing broken into easy pieces. Thanks

  • @abhishekkumaramar3166
    @abhishekkumaramar3166 4 роки тому

    best of best voice over both in English and Hindi version 👍👍👍👍👍🥰

  • @subarudriver6027
    @subarudriver6027 3 роки тому

    The best explanation of magnetron basics !

  • @pouya444
    @pouya444 4 роки тому +1

    Finally, an explanation of magnetron I understand, and I'm in North America.

  • @_keji_5110
    @_keji_5110 4 роки тому

    I just found this wonderful channel, please don't leave it

  • @mj2906
    @mj2906 4 роки тому +2

    Great learning resort!
    I add my impression that star-shaped electron cloud inside magnetron would oscillate changing shape when charge on the anode.

  • @MOHITKWATRA
    @MOHITKWATRA 2 роки тому

    Love this behavior and principle of magnetron

  • @sagarrawal5087
    @sagarrawal5087 4 роки тому +1

    You guys really inspired me a lot I have made video on how electric car works but unable to get subscribers n views I just want to spread education but after making 2 videos a day fails me to spread knowledge

  • @vidhyasagar1990
    @vidhyasagar1990 3 роки тому

    It is physics ASMR man.. I watched it in repeat mode👍👏👏👏👌