On a drive on the south of Alaska, as far as I could see, there was a forest of leafless trees. I asked the driver. There was a tsunami, I think in the 1960s, which stagnanated taking awhile to drain. A forest of fossilized trees resulted, in less than a month. Some of the trees had been buried in mud, and I saw several where the now totally dried rock, former mud, with clear strata just as if millions of years, were traversed by trees. These polystratic trees are common. I personally saw dozens without even trying just because I was being driven between cities.
@@OnASeasideMission "How did that work out?" Yeah, that's kind of funny because Darwinian evo. is on the way out. Even strict evolutionists are aware that it doesn't explain what we see today.
To Whom It May Concern: A note, or just in a word, the key subject/topic to the video, to reference for future research, would be beneficial for Bereans.
Kurt, Thank You for the work you are doing and the education you've provided. Please answer this question. How does mud become rock? I was taught in my public education that it hardened in "millions of years" but we know that is not the case. Any idea of the correct time span required for dinosaur foot prints, plants and trees to harden? Thank you
Reading the comments under this video makes me smile. I see so much intelligence, so great a desire to know the truth. That means that the dumbing down and brainwashing of this nation, and world in general, has certainly not been totally successful.
@@statutesofthelord I understand sometimes you might see long coalified trees running thru multiple layers of coal or standing straight up through them
Good to see a great question. Yes, let's study how the layers came about by their characteristics, likely during unique event(s) that could be very different than known typical events causing them. Lighter material would end up on top of heavier.
Does that mean almost all fossils of flattened plants occurred all at same time during same event causing their fossilization? Rather than fossils made continously under norml average geological events?
Before hearing explanation of sinking in water while firmed by swollen cells, I thought water pressure under and around the pliable leaf sinking slowly would keep it flat, any currents would cause folds from uneven pressures.
I can go outside tonight and see stars that emitted their light millions of years ago that is just now reaching my eye. Earth is only 6K years old? I don't think so.
I have gone back and forth on young earth/old earth and the literality of days myself. The speed of light as we know it, according to the physics we know and love today, would require millions of years were it to start at its source and travel to earth, but on the flipside, a sovereign God is not bound by physics, or anything other than His own nature, really, so He could've easily spoke everything into existence with light already having reached earth. That's not something that could be proven (or disproven for that matter), but the beginning of the universe, even for atheists, defies all physics as we know it today, so using the modern state of things as an unyielding ruler against which to measure the beginning of things doesn't seem any more compelling than the alternative. After all, even atheists believe that nothing suddenly exploded and became time, space, and matter, an event we have never once observed today.
This argument with dead leaf not straightening out in the water was a bit incoherent cuz you literally put dead leaf with hundreds of other dead leafs in the waters which look pretty straight to me, no offence intended
The walking rolling my feet I figured out buy my self my friend told me the three step paws and I know that you have to take it very slowly also stop and look for a long time it's easy to disappear if you just hold still don't look in there eyes and usually they don't see what they're not expecting
@@bookofrevelation4924 are you saying "Read More" as indicating if you tap more text will be revealed cuz I don't see those words when reading comment in "Full View".
No, Genesis is not history, it's a retelling of even older myths. Interesting to read but just an old story. The flood myth is nothing but a variation of the earlier flood myth in the Epic of Gilgamesh.
Have you ever heard that song that goes like this: I heard through the grapevine. That’s the epic of Gilgamesh, an old story yes but a retelling of the original because those people telling the epic of Gilgamesh are the descendants of Noah or his children. Genesis is our human history and the Bible is our creator’s testimony.
@@JustNeil1 Genesis is absurd nonsense! There was no global flood in human history. It's probably a ancient memory of the melt at the end of the last ice age which covered a lot of the inhabited planet but was not global.
I cannot get enough of this topic, it's jaw dropping in every way, everywhere it is on display. God Bless
On a drive on the south of Alaska, as far as I could see, there was a forest of leafless trees. I asked the driver. There was a tsunami, I think in the 1960s, which stagnanated taking awhile to drain. A forest of fossilized trees resulted, in less than a month. Some of the trees had been buried in mud, and I saw several where the now totally dried rock, former mud, with clear strata just as if millions of years, were traversed by trees. These polystratic trees are common. I personally saw dozens without even trying just because I was being driven between cities.
Wow
When the evidence is looked at from a Biblical viewpoint, for some reason it all makes sense.
When you already have a belief, the primary goal of your science is contaminated by bias. We are all living in a pre- flood world now.
Yes yes!!
Sedgwick and Murchison, and even Darwin, set out with biblical viewpoints.
How did that work out?
@@OnASeasideMission "How did that work out?"
Yeah, that's kind of funny because Darwinian evo. is on the way out.
Even strict evolutionists are aware that it doesn't explain what we see today.
Kurt Wise is my knowledge guru. I love his lectures. I wish I could get him to our Church for a 3 day creation conference.
Wow! That's pretty good detective work.
Thanks guys, y'all do great work! I really love Dr. Kurt's enthusiasm! God bless y'all!
Love these videos!
Pretty interesting.
I know a mountain around here that has a bunch of fossilized leaves, twigs and branches.
Thank you for this from a Biblical perspective, it all makes so much sense.
Amen and God bless you 🙏🙏🙏✝️
When politics is stripped away from science, every time it points to God.
Excellent!
To Whom It May Concern:
A note, or just in a word, the key subject/topic to the video, to reference for future research, would be beneficial for Bereans.
Kurt, Thank You for the work you are doing and the education you've provided. Please answer this question. How does mud become rock? I was taught in my public education that it hardened in "millions of years" but we know that is not the case. Any idea of the correct time span required for dinosaur foot prints, plants and trees to harden? Thank you
Reading the comments under this video makes me smile. I see so much intelligence, so great a desire to know the truth.
That means that the dumbing down and brainwashing of this nation, and world in general, has certainly not been totally successful.
I'm a coal miner and I have some nice frond leaf ends from a pre-flood time tree. I wish I could've got more than what I have.
I've heard of huge fossilized leaves etc. being found sometimes in coal mines. Did you see any?
@@statutesofthelord I understand sometimes you might see long coalified trees running thru multiple layers of coal or standing straight up through them
How did he determine those fossils were from pre-flood plants? How did the fossils end up on top of the huge amount of flood deposited sediment?
Good to see a great question. Yes, let's study how the layers came about by their characteristics, likely during unique event(s) that could be very different than known typical events causing them.
Lighter material would end up on top of heavier.
by the types of plants they are. The ferns and trees he mentioned that are in the rock fossils there, dont exist since then
Does that mean almost all fossils of flattened plants occurred all at same time during same event causing their fossilization?
Rather than fossils made continously under norml average geological events?
Before hearing explanation of sinking in water while firmed by swollen cells, I thought water pressure under and around the pliable leaf sinking slowly would keep it flat, any currents would cause folds from uneven pressures.
No no no. At an inch of covering every million years it took half a billion years to cover that fern.
Your sarcasm showing the fallacy of Evolution is good.
I can go outside tonight and see stars that emitted their light millions of years ago that is just now reaching my eye. Earth is only 6K years old? I don't think so.
you dont understand relativity
I have gone back and forth on young earth/old earth and the literality of days myself. The speed of light as we know it, according to the physics we know and love today, would require millions of years were it to start at its source and travel to earth, but on the flipside, a sovereign God is not bound by physics, or anything other than His own nature, really, so He could've easily spoke everything into existence with light already having reached earth.
That's not something that could be proven (or disproven for that matter), but the beginning of the universe, even for atheists, defies all physics as we know it today, so using the modern state of things as an unyielding ruler against which to measure the beginning of things doesn't seem any more compelling than the alternative. After all, even atheists believe that nothing suddenly exploded and became time, space, and matter, an event we have never once observed today.
This argument with dead leaf not straightening out in the water was a bit incoherent cuz you literally put dead leaf with hundreds of other dead leafs in the waters which look pretty straight to me, no offence intended
I'm not an animal.
I am.
Yes you are.
The walking rolling my feet I figured out buy my self my friend told me the three step paws and I know that you have to take it very slowly also stop and look for a long time it's easy to disappear if you just hold still don't look in there eyes and usually they don't see what they're not expecting
Beautiful poem.
sounds like word salad
@@WDBsirLocksight I understood until I reached the words Read More, they confuse me as to how they fit the sentence.
@@bookofrevelation4924
are you saying "Read More" as indicating if you tap more text will be revealed cuz I don't see those words when reading comment in "Full View".
@@WDBsirLocksight there's more if you tap the last line?
Joggins Nova Scotia foŕ fossil treès
No, Genesis is not history, it's a retelling of even older myths. Interesting to read but just an old story. The flood myth is nothing but a variation of the earlier flood myth in the Epic of Gilgamesh.
Have you ever heard that song that goes like this: I heard through the grapevine. That’s the epic of Gilgamesh, an old story yes but a retelling of the original because those people telling the epic of Gilgamesh are the descendants of Noah or his children. Genesis is our human history and the Bible is our creator’s testimony.
@@JustNeil1 Genesis is absurd nonsense! There was no global flood in human history. It's probably a ancient memory of the melt at the end of the last ice age which covered a lot of the inhabited planet but was not global.
Imagine if it were a true historical relic from the flooding of Doggerland or the eastern Med? That would be awesome!
What a bunch of silly people.