We've gotten a lot of questions from people asking how the dinosaur fossils highlighted in this video (discovered at the Hanson Ranch Bonebed) can have been buried during the global Flood if they bear evidence of other dinosaurs scavenging on them. You can find the answer to this question, along with much more information, in this helpful article from our other website, New Creation Blog: bit.ly/3oCPspT.
A animal goes to a watering hole or feeding area only to get stuck in the mud and die. A few weeks later or even a few years later another animal goes to the same watering hole, gets stuck in the mud and dies. This continues to happen over hundreds, thousands or even millions of years of years. This may be a cataclysmic event for the animals involved but certainly not evidence of a world wide flood or a disaster. *Creationism simply makes believe in order to fulfill their narrative.* Creationists don't like actual facts and would rather pretend and make-believe.
i greatly appreciate the work you guys put in and give away freely! thankyou so much. been catchin up on this series and i was drawn in by the floating log mats video and im just amazed
After working in Geology 10 years on site during the drilling process for oil and natural gas in many states across the US, I can say it all appears to be laid down quickly like in a flood. Always enjoyed finding fossils amongst the formations from several thousand feet deep. The first time you find a seashell the size of the ball on a ballpoint pen in a representative sample taken from 3500' down hole is pretty amazing when you see it staring back at you under a microscope. My boss was on an offshore rig in the Gulf off the coast of Louisiana 200 miles. 1500' down they hit something harder than the siltstone they were drilling through. They went to the shaker to capture a sample and discovered they had drilled though an ancient cypress tree stump or trunk. They filled 5 gallon buckets with the wood that circulated up. He gave the shards out as gifts to Company men and tool pushers as ancient toothpicks haha. God's creation is a beautiful thing. Everyone on the drilling platform couldn't believe wood was coming out of a drill hole that was under so much water and so far from shore. I suppose the lack of oxygen and lack of silicates prevented the wood from petrifying. Thanks for the video!
One of the most compelling of these, that I just recently came across, is that of the Ancient Chinese 'Oracle' Bones. Paleontologists have put these artifacts to about 2500 B.C., they describe the entire Creation event, from both Adam to Noah & His Family! Very fascinating...The Book is 'God's gift to the Chinese'. 1997
@@grassroot011 Flood stories exist all over the world, because there have always been floods. People just didn't know that it was only in their area because they didn't know what was 20 kilometers away from where they lived.
Serious question. Have they found similar findings with human remains? Like large groups of people? I want to say that I saw that once and that they had referred to them as mass burial sites related to plagues or something. Does anybody know?
@Nappy Vids If the schools dare to teach anything other than Evolution, the secular community has a fit and threatens lawsuits. It would be great if schools could teach an equal balance of Evolution and Creation, without bias, and let the students decide which theory they choose to believe. Today, they only mention Creation as “the theory believed by the extreme Right Wing, conservative Christians” and usually mentioned with an eye roll. 🙄 I’m being a bit sarcastic there as not all teachers use that definition. LOL BUT I have heard it and seen it. Let’s open minds... not close them. I so agree with you.
There isn't enough evidence based information out there for creationism to be taught. I'm sorry but it is true. Plus creationism is based on religious theories and use the Bible as its core source. The Bible is based on faith. You as parents and your churches are their to teach about creationism, use thst to counter points in public school about evolution if you want.
@@kkossor3046 Yes, teach all religious creation accounts not just the christian one. I also believe we should teach of where every religion came from. You know how every religion evolved from the earlier ones. P.S. Creationism is not a theory of science. At best creationism is a hypothesis. That covers old earth,young earth and gap theory creationism accounts.
@@raipier Science, itself, is discovering that the Bible, and the names and places, therein, are historical fact. Not the foolish notions of the faithful who believe in a mythical tale, which you inferred, but left unspoken. It, in fact, proves itself more accurate than the, supposed science, portrayed history. For instance, the Pyramids being constructed using copper tools, sweat and rope.I feel that those are the notions of fools writing a mythical history. THAT, is a far more preposterous supposition, than what this video proposes here. In all fairness.
I still can't figure out how the last two lions never killed off the last two Zebra or Last two Wolves didn't kill off the last two Deer. Haven't seen them explain how the prey was allowed to gain un numbers before the predators killed them all and starved or just starved unless there were MANY MANY more species that actually didn't make it because of the predators killing them off. Or how they all made it onto different continents unless the water level fall to the point that the ocean beds were exposed.
@@ambeegaming76 All Obligate Carnivores can live off plants, even the hardest of all animals "cats" who have a broken Gene that requires them to synthesize sufficient taurine from cysteine which forces them to obtain it from the diet. Yet there are multiple examples of plant eating cats. I even made a video on it and show that even today they can still revert back to eating plants. However, regarding being on the ark, there would have been young animals (before breeding age), and they (like animals today) would have a latent ability to hibernate or aestivate. Skunks, bees, snakes, and groundhogs to name a few outside of bears and bats are the most well-known. Making them easy to care for and tend to on an Ark. Especially young small ones. Also consider animals repopulate FAST and speciate FAST, and predators are always a low population anywhere you go in the world. We already know this bottleneck occurred anyone because of the new study that found ALL life arose at the same time from a world wide bottleneck. It was discovered looking at the CO1 gene in mtDNA. I even made a video on that as well. Nothing is much of a mystery anymore.
Marine fossils are found in nearly ALL STRATA! Including on the highest mountain peaks. Lake Titicaca contains seahorses, sea Kelp - DESPITE being within a very high mountain range ; as well as being surrounded by salt flats!! Truly amazing, and beautiful place!
But where are the fossils of the thousands of people who died? The animals - horses, cattle, rabbits, mice, birds? That’s always been a puzzlement for me.
Because there's a gap of Millions of years. The nearest you would find today would be the buried remains in Pompey; hundreds trapped under volcanic ash. In many more Millions of years, today's cemeteries would be seen as a fossil layer. Bones are constantly being unearthed in archeological digs, but they aren't old enough to have fossilised.
Sounds like what you would have if there was waves of water and mud washing back and forth all over the world. There have been instances where entire trees were found standing through all the layers of strata.
I used to work for a team of archaeologists, paleontologists and ethnologists, logging fossils and other admin work. That storage room brings back wonderful memories. Of course we never had dinosaur fossils as we were in California. Some large cats and other animals, but mostly pottery, tools, etc. So sad when they dispersed.
This is a perfect example of how as we gain in knowledge so does the history of our planet. For those who can't accept new ideas and theory are just closed minded and most often proved wrong. History must be fluid ever changing as our knowledge increases.
@Darth Quantum "The problem with your statement is that it's the religious who are close-minded." Demonstrably false. A creationist can consider whether a particular phenomenon has a natural or a supernatural cause. He is open-minded. A naturalistic scientist cannot consider whether it had a supernatural cause. His mind is closed to that option. "The rest of us are willing to go to wherever the evidence leads." Simply not true. The principle of _methodological naturalism_ does not allow going to a supernatural explanation even if the evidence leads that way. As Dr. Scott Todd wrote in _Nature,_ "Even if all the data point to an intelligent designer, such a hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not naturalistic." That is, they will _not_ follow the evidence if it leads to an intelligent designer.
At 8:30 Prof Chadwick states that there was a major catastrophic event, and all the animals all died at the same time. But at 6"20 he states the Tyrannosaurs came in after the duck bills had died and scavenged on them. Also, if they all died in the great flood, why are there no bones of any animals after the KT boundary.
Rob perhaps it took many months for the flood waters to start drowning the animals . Perhaps They ate what was already drowned or damaged by falling trees.
Also alot of dinosaurs went in the arc, but obv as a baby version, otherwise it wouldnt fit. So although alot of animals died, they didnt go exstinct. Right after the flood, they got out of the arc and could eat the remains of the dead people and animals that didnt get burried.
A while ago I was staggered with the fact that I had never conceived in my mind what the earth's watering system would have looked like and how it would have worked prior to the flood. When I did give it some serious thought, it seemed reasonable that most of the vast volumes of rounded rock, from small pebbles right up to boulders the size of a car, were formed within that system, then it was spewed out at the time of the flood when "all the fountains of the great deep were broken up”.
Didn't you know that northern hemisphere bias means that the world is normally pictured the wrong way up? Australia is actually on top of the world and Europe and North America on the bottom! :-) See here: i.pinimg-dot-com/originals/6a/dd/23/6add23c1fc46b9ad204a6216144dbf96.jpg
xxxchurch100 he was joking. You know you all down there are upside down. Backwards. You clicked the dislike because from down there it it a thunks up 👍👎 see?
Philip Rayment a 👎 as viewed from Australia would be a 👍! He was joking. Goodness Aussies are sensitive! Must be from standing on your head so much! 🤣🤣🤣 Seriously the earth is Flat so there is no upside down. 😊
@@PJRayment Yes, just like Paul Hogan said in his tv day's "the reason Australia is down under is because of all the iron we have here, it made the Earth tip and so we are not down under but up over"...
Why would different dino species be buried in different layers, I wonder. I would *assume* instead that, were they deposited via Noah's flood, they would all be mixed together, at least to some degree (perhaps the top layer dinos were able to reach higher ground during the flood and thus survived the longest; nevertheless, surely not uniformly). Perhaps the later top-layer dinos were somehow more buoyant? I wonder if the same pattern is found everywhere, or only at this particular dig site.
Unfortunately, to date, no flying reptiles have been found in the Hanson Ranch bonebed, the quarry where Chadwick and his team are excavating or concurrent fossil sites in the immediate area. They have found a few fossils belonging to birds, however.
Haha. I am sure Dr. Chadwick would get a kick out of your comment. He is a very easy going and nice man. Next time I see him I will try to remember to show him your comment.
I have often wondered why there is not also a massive graveyard of the remains of the enormous population of people that perished in the Genesis flood. Maybe there is and I have not been apprised of such.
It seems likely the first layer is the initial wave, and the next layers are succeeding waves, which would create definition between layers of varied materials, then there's backwash and run off. The layers are used to indicate time, but I think it's just layers from one big process, and also standing water left in low areas.
That would be because it is believed that a large planetoid sized object hit the earth during its formation which ejected material into orbit which then became the moon
Bonebeds are known worldwide. Question: why don´t you find dinosaur fossils together with those of mammals if they allegedly lived at the same time??? Why don´t you find anything that indicates the presence of men in cretaceous and older bonebeds (bones, debris) ? The simple answer: because humans didn´t exist at that time. Another question: how much time did it take to depostit f.e. a meter of sediment? Answer: it varies heavily. The intact whale fossil does not indicate automaticlý that it was burried fast. It indicates an enviroment where a. there where no scavengers and b. the conditions where that the body stayed intact when it was covered in sediment. That could have taken place in a rather quiet part of the ocean without strong currents. In his publcation he ist talking about "diatomaceous sediments" which indicates the opposite of a strong water movement. And the video from 13:50 - 15:00 sounds a lot like evolution to me.
"why don´t you find dinosaur fossils together with those of mammals if they allegedly lived at the same time???" You do. But the secular world downplays that fact. "Why don´t you find anything that indicates the presence of men in cretaceous and older bonebeds (bones, debris) ?" Possibly because God said that he wanted to wipe out all trace of men, or something along those lines. Or likely because humans had a better ability to escape the rising floodwaters for longer, so were not buried in the same layers. "The simple answer: because humans didn´t exist at that time." Yes, I guess that is a simple answer. Doesn't mean that it's the right answer, though. "The intact whale fossil does not indicate automaticlý that it was burried fast. It indicates an enviroment where a. there where no scavengers and b. the conditions where that the body stayed intact when it was covered in sediment." Where are there no scavengers, even insects and smaller creatures? And what are those conditions that caused it to stay intact. Modern observations are that bodies are scavenged and rot and etc. very quickly (days to weeks). But observed sedimentation is _much_ slower than that. "And the video from 13:50 - 15:00 sounds a lot like evolution to me." I know what you mean, but it also sounds a lot like the order that things would be buried in the flood.
And about the whales, to be untouched could mean that the creature was encapsulated by the sediment that was loosened by the water itself that displaced the whale from known seas to land. I could see that...
Watch more of the videos because they build your understanding. Or you can watch the longer videos that last over an hour. There are some good ones with a geologist who's very excited to pass on his very acurate interesting scientific knowledge. God bless!
Well y'all are getting closer the Bible let's us know that the Earth is less than 7,000 years old and man did walk with dinasaurs and off course we. We didn't evolve from apes , Adam was probably the smartest man ever , even though he did listen to his wife instead of God. Their are so many ways that disprove Earth being billions of years old but atleast they are starting to tell it closer to the truth.
The Earth is a great deal older than seven thousand years, man most certainly did not walk with dinosaurs and, no matter how many people attempt to deny it, the evidence does indicate that we did evolve from primitive apes. Hard to believe that someone could be so wrong about so many things with just one post but ignorance knows no bounds.
Why specific animals in specific layers? Why are seeing only a specific mix of animals in very specific layers, stacked in the exact same order EVERYWHERE? Should not we find lots of mammalian fossils like mammoths, giant sloths, camels, bears, sabertooth cats, etc. Even a rat or some other rodent. Some, any, sign of mammals, and at least a bird or two? At least once in a while we should have a mixing of animals normally found in different layers within the same layer and the same kind of rock. Do we?
Massive tidal waves or tsunamis, the actions which created the flood also caused pole shift. Axis wobble, and but understood by having two people the first clasping both hands into a ball indicative of the earth. The second placing their hands loosely around the hands of the first. representing 2 miles of water. At this point, the first person rocks the inner hands and you will see where the Tidal Waves came from.
Noah’s flood caused it. The fountains of the deep started it by The Lord. This killed off the sea animals first. They were buried first . Scalled to death by 900 degree water from 10 miles down under the sea floor. Psalms 74:13-14. This water blew out of there like a pressure cooker and flooded the earth. The evidence of this can still be seen in the bottom of the ocean. It is called the Mid Oceanic Ridge. It is 40,000 long and goes around the whole Earth. This flooded the earth along with 40 days of rain.
@greggd2027 Great question! The short answer is that the water is still here. According to the catastrophic plate tectonics Flood model, there was a sudden increase in seafloor spreading rates worldwide at the beginning of the Flood. This shallowed the ocean basins and displaced the seawater, causing it to gradually rise and cover the continents. When seafloor spreading decreased toward the end of the Flood, sea levels dropped as the seawater returned to the ocean basins. Please see the following article for more information about the catastrophic plate tectonics model: answersingenesis.org/geology/plate-tectonics/catastrophic-plate-tectonics-global-flood-model-of-earth-history/
Greetings @bluesdirt6555, This fossil site (called the Hanson Ranch Bonebed) occurs in Cretaceous rock layers. These layers are very thick and extensive, so we think were formed during the Flood. Mammoth fossils typically occur in layers of unlithified (unhardened) sediment overlying the rock layers containing dinosaur fossils. This suggests that the mammoths lived after the Flood, most likely during the Ice Age that lasted for several centuries after the Flood had ended. You can check out this video on our UA-cam channel for more information: ua-cam.com/video/R2LQIMBTGzY/v-deo.html
"Taphonomist Arthur Chadwick shows us his collection of 20,000 fossils," Are any of them fossils of human beings found in the same strata as the dinosaur fossils? Any fossils of bears or rabbits or horses or cattle?
@@yahushua7773 Fish do have a tendency to die when there is no water ;) Actually, in those areas of the Earth where there is frequent rain there is also erosion, destroying the fossils that might have been there. We find fish fossils in areas which are NOW dry because the layers containing them were not washed away by weather.
Im pretty sure i had a nephilim bone when i was a kid, my dog stole it from a very secretive dig the government was doing close to our house. Im not into strange spiritual stuff... But that big piece of bone had some super weird 'vibes' to it.
Thank you so much for this wonderful high quality production. This is what give Christians confidence for themselves and for our children. Many many thanks and May the Lord richly bless your endeavors.
I think the major takeaway from this video is the direction and planetary scale of sediment layering that does not follow the underlying landscape topology.
The shear costs of the rack that store those fossils is staggering; probably saw more in value than my home (land included) many times over. Kind of like 100’s of Snap-On Tool chests. 😂
It's mentioned in the Authorised Version of the Bible, but that is a translation issue. The Hebrew word does not indicate one horn, and it probably refers to a type of ox. See creation . com/the-unicorn (remove the two space)
I used to wonder this as well. God wanted to destroy mankind at the time because we had been tainted with Nephilim DNA. That’s my theory, anyway. I’m sure he wanted absolute destruction with not one trace left
Good question, but consider the number of people alive at the time, WAY low compared to animals which have FAST generation times and speciate. Also, humans have a subcutaneous layer of fat under our skin which makes us float when we die. So the humans buried early on in the flood that didn't get a chance to float were probably made into oil and we actually have evidence of man with dinosaur its just suppressed. I made a video on it actually = ua-cam.com/video/eN463CvOM9c/v-deo.html
Just above the Yucatan Peninsula there is a huge impact crater. Could this impact be the trigger that breaks up the "Pangaea" giant continent, creating the continental drift, and causing the world wide flood in the process? So far, all the evidence you have presented for a global flood indicates that the Ark had a wild ride.
So the Flood was able to create layer sequences that have the most primitive sea creatures at the bottom, ascending to fish, then land animals , and ultimately the dinosaurs right through the Triassic, Jurassic and finally the Cretaceous ? Kind of a sieve-like effect which has ( understandably, but mistakenly ) given paleontologists the impression of life having developed slowly over great tracts of time?
Sir Richard Owen (who disagreed with Darwin's ideas) coined the term in 1841, after studying some dinosaur fossil bones, but how long before that they were discovered I don't know.
This is an truly amazing. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. The Bible is telling the Truth, literally. Do you know Dr Myeong Hyun Kim in Korea? He is also studying Biblical science and go all over the country to teach about these very scientific findings to tell the people that the Bible is the TRUTH. The LORD bless you.
Hard to understand how he failed to find much bioturbation or roots. I have studied many outcrops ofJurassic and Cretaceous rocks in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming. Bioturbation and roots are extremely common and there are many published examples.
I think you misunderstood the layers missing the turbation he was talking about wasn't the layers the fossils was in but the layers that covered them. Suggesting that something catastrophic over a short period of time was a factor in ending the Cretacious period as well as other periods like the Jurassic. That it wasn't a long process taking millions of years.
So who are you and show us what you digged up? Not sure about your honesty. Did he not mentioned it seems that that specific bone collection were transported to that spot. Its not the original place of death. Naturally the floodwater separated materials.
@@kenjett2434 My experience is that bioturbation is pervasive and indicates many long periods of very slow deposition. Check out his comments starting at about 17:30. He clearly states that he does not find any evidence of roots or burrows of thousands of m of sediment. I have studied many outcrops and found this highly suspect.
@@antonloubser He stated there were many layers with fossils that were transported, and then scavenged. In other words, time between the layers. There is abundant evidence that the transport was done by rivers. The sedimentology of the sandstones pretty much proves this. I have 30 years experience as a professional geologist specializing in paleontology (taphonomy) and stratigraphy, working mostly in the petroleum business. In petroleum geology the evidence is overwhelming for an ancient earth. What a lot of people don't realize is that the science unraveling the evolution of the earth has major economic implications. And, just for the record, I am very honest. My wife has learned never to ask my opinion about her clothing because I will tell her.
Howard F, you wrote, "Hard to understand how he failed to find much bioturbation or roots. I have studied many outcrops ofJurassic and Cretaceous rocks in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming. Bioturbation and roots are extremely common and there are many published examples." That is the first I have heard of that, and I am an old man who was an evolutionist for most of his life. Do you have any references? Dan
The number of organisms necessary to produce the number of shells deposited in some of the chalk deposits are more than the sea could support, by many orders of magnitude. These things can be measured, and no, no single flood could be responsible for the sedimentary rock formations of the world. There is no process by which the particular different layers could be laid down sequentially, and no source for those materiels that doesn't require thousands to millions of years to collect.
Each period in earth history is named for a type location somewhere in the world. Cretaceous is in France, named for the Latin name for chalk. Devonian comes from Devon, England. The reason all these names are useful is that the order of fossils is about the same world wide. And so it is useful to have names for the different levels in that succession. Even within the Cretaceous there are 12 stages, recognized mostly by the succession of coccoliths that is recognized world wide.
If the Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous layers happen at different times and produced different types of fossils then that would suggest many different floods not just one.
Perhaps it was because the marine animals were buried first along with marine plants, then the land animals were buried under more moving sediments and tree bark. The waves and mud going forward and back again cause more burials at different levels. Volcanoes were erupting in the oceans and on land spilling out more lava, rock, water, mud caused mor burials over a years time.
So why are there no human bones in there with those dinosaur bones? Heck I would settle for wolf, buffalo, elephant, horse, cow or any other mammals as well.
Great video! I love seeing evidence that the Bible is true. I hope this kind of work becomes more and more widely dispersed, overturning the mainstream consensus about evolution. Keep us the good work!
very interesting. Yet, say one were an evolutionist, how would they interpret the data that Dr. Chadwick presented? And what might be your counter-argument (rebuttal)?
My counter-argument would, of course, depend on their argument, but it would likely include the fact that evolutionary science is done on the basis that only natural explanations are acceptable, a concept labelled "methodological naturalism", and it is therefore biased, and using naturalistic science to argue against the biblical account is a circular argument, which is logically invalid. That is, naturalistic science will reject explanations involving the supernatural _even if the evidence favours the supernatural explanation._
I did my PhD on taphonomy so I will answer. First he stated that there were several bone beds at different times, so not just one event. Then he stated that the carcasses were scavenged, so that had to take some time between the events. I have not worked on these bone beds, but I have worked a lot in the Jurassic Morrison Formation in Utah, which also has a lot of dino bones. In that formation the evidence that rivers transported the sediment and bones is overwhelming. I can go into the sedimentology but there are many papers published on this. There is also great evidence for ancient soils in the Morrison, such as insect burrows and roots, exactly the type of evidence Chadwick says would indicate lots of time.
4 роки тому
trust in the Lord with all one's heart and lean not unto your own understanding.. all men are destined to die and then the judgement. last time I checked we all just woke up here one day, and it can get a whole lot worse ..
@@howardf5264 "First he stated that there were several bone beds at different times, so not just one event." The flood lasted a year, so would have included multiple episodes of deposition and erosion. That detail doesn't refute the flood. "Then he stated that the carcasses were scavenged, so that had to take some time between the events." Which could also have happened during that period. "…the evidence that rivers transported the sediment and bones is overwhelming." When you say "rivers", what's the evidence that it was rivers as we know them and not larger bodies of moving water? "I can go into the sedimentology but there are many papers published on this." In fact no widespread sedimentology has ever been observed that is deep enough to bury even small living things.
@Darth Quantum "Leo, there are videos on YT refuting this nonsense." Except that it's not nonsense. "Creationist arguments haven't changed since Gish and Morris. They keep repeating the same mantra no matter how many times it's been disproven." Apart from getting more and more evidence making the case even stronger. And no, it has not been disproven. Telling someone that they are wrong does not make it wrong. "Saying it over and over doesn't make it true. Honestly, it's childish." True. Yet anti-creationists keep saying over and over that the creationists are wrong. It's childish, because they rarely actually even try to show that they are wrong, just as you haven't done so here. "Those of us who do actual science don't have time to waste on these people." "These people" also do actual science. "I don't know a single astronomer (and ,yes, I personally know several) who would engage a debate with a … religious nut who thinks the universe is only 6000 years old because that's how he interprets some ancient book." Perhaps because you live in an anti-creationist bubble. And are ignorant of the fact that there are genuine astronomers who are creationists, and they are not "nuts". But then name-calling is typical of anti-creationists. That's another thing, like repeating oneself, that doesn't make it true. Further, that "ancient book" is widely believed, with good reason, to be an reliable source of history written for us by God. "…a debate would only give them a platform, an air of legitimacy they don't deserve and haven't earned." No, the real problem is that a debate would expose that the evolutionists' arguments are weak.
We've gotten a lot of questions from people asking how the dinosaur fossils highlighted in this video (discovered at the Hanson Ranch Bonebed) can have been buried during the global Flood if they bear evidence of other dinosaurs scavenging on them. You can find the answer to this question, along with much more information, in this helpful article from our other website, New Creation Blog: bit.ly/3oCPspT.
A animal goes to a watering hole or feeding area only to get stuck in the mud and die. A few weeks later or even a few years later another animal goes to the same watering hole, gets stuck in the mud and dies. This continues to happen over hundreds, thousands or even millions of years of years. This may be a cataclysmic event for the animals involved but certainly not evidence of a world wide flood or a disaster.
*Creationism simply makes believe in order to fulfill their narrative.*
Creationists don't like actual facts and would rather pretend and make-believe.
i greatly appreciate the work you guys put in and give away freely!
thankyou so much.
been catchin up on this series and i was drawn in by the floating log mats video and im just amazed
The copied scriptures in the article do not reflect those in the KJV. What version of the bible was used?
Fish?
Mudslides would of happened during and after a major flood. Imagine giant rivers carving through soft dirt and the sides will eventually collapse.
After working in Geology 10 years on site during the drilling process for oil and natural gas in many states across the US, I can say it all appears to be laid down quickly like in a flood. Always enjoyed finding fossils amongst the formations from several thousand feet deep. The first time you find a seashell the size of the ball on a ballpoint pen in a representative sample taken from 3500' down hole is pretty amazing when you see it staring back at you under a microscope. My boss was on an offshore rig in the Gulf off the coast of Louisiana 200 miles. 1500' down they hit something harder than the siltstone they were drilling through. They went to the shaker to capture a sample and discovered they had drilled though an ancient cypress tree stump or trunk. They filled 5 gallon buckets with the wood that circulated up. He gave the shards out as gifts to Company men and tool pushers as ancient toothpicks haha. God's creation is a beautiful thing. Everyone on the drilling platform couldn't believe wood was coming out of a drill hole that was under so much water and so far from shore. I suppose the lack of oxygen and lack of silicates prevented the wood from petrifying. Thanks for the video!
Wow incredible!!
Thank you for your comment.
As expected, naysayers will dismiss this comment with inane, ad hominem retorts for lack of reasonable argument.
So what date would you give for the great flood?
Whatever happened was planet wide.
Every culture in the world have a story of a great flood...not just Christians...so you know something global happened
So the records of early man, Pagans Idolators, etc. agree with Scripture. At least they were not as dishonest as truth deniers of today.
Its far more logical that people took the stories with them when they were dispersed from Babel.
You're right.....people think the bible is just fables....but ancient writings from other cultures just keep proving it to be true.
One of the most compelling of these, that I just recently came across, is that of the Ancient Chinese 'Oracle' Bones. Paleontologists have put these artifacts to about 2500 B.C., they describe the entire Creation event, from both Adam to Noah & His Family! Very fascinating...The Book is 'God's gift to the Chinese'. 1997
@@grassroot011
Flood stories exist all over the world, because there have always been floods. People just didn't know that it was only in their area because they didn't know what was 20 kilometers away from where they lived.
Serious question. Have they found similar findings with human remains? Like large groups of people? I want to say that I saw that once and that they had referred to them as mass burial sites related to plagues or something. Does anybody know?
I hope when I am as old as Dr. Chadwick that I am as knowledgeable and jolly as he is.
All this knowledge and yet our children are taught common core.
@Nappy Vids If the schools dare to teach anything other than Evolution, the secular community has a fit and threatens lawsuits. It would be great if schools could teach an equal balance of Evolution and Creation, without bias, and let the students decide which theory they choose to believe. Today, they only mention Creation as “the theory believed by the extreme Right Wing, conservative Christians” and usually mentioned with an eye roll. 🙄 I’m being a bit sarcastic there as not all teachers use that definition. LOL BUT I have heard it and seen it. Let’s open minds... not close them. I so agree with you.
There isn't enough evidence based information out there for creationism to be taught. I'm sorry but it is true. Plus creationism is based on religious theories and use the Bible as its core source. The Bible is based on faith. You as parents and your churches are their to teach about creationism, use thst to counter points in public school about evolution if you want.
Andrew what is the evidence for chemical predestination that is taught?
@@kkossor3046 Yes, teach all religious creation accounts not just the christian one. I also believe we should teach of where every religion came from. You know how every religion evolved from the earlier ones. P.S. Creationism is not a theory of science. At best creationism is a hypothesis. That covers old earth,young earth and gap theory creationism accounts.
@@raipier Science, itself, is discovering that the Bible, and the names and places, therein, are historical fact. Not the foolish notions of the faithful who believe in a mythical tale, which you inferred, but left unspoken. It, in fact, proves itself more accurate than the, supposed science, portrayed history. For instance, the Pyramids being constructed using copper tools, sweat and rope.I feel that those are the notions of fools writing a mythical history. THAT, is a far more preposterous supposition, than what this video proposes here. In all fairness.
Loved this documentary.
The truth is destroying the "academic" lies.
May God bless those who belive in Jesus.
I still can't figure out how the last two lions never killed off the last two Zebra or Last two Wolves didn't kill off the last two Deer. Haven't seen them explain how the prey was allowed to gain un numbers before the predators killed them all and starved or just starved unless there were MANY MANY more species that actually didn't make it because of the predators killing them off.
Or how they all made it onto different continents unless the water level fall to the point that the ocean beds were exposed.
@@ambeegaming76 All Obligate Carnivores can live off plants, even the hardest of all animals "cats" who have a broken Gene that requires them to synthesize sufficient taurine from cysteine which forces them to obtain it from the diet. Yet there are multiple examples of plant eating cats.
I even made a video on it and show that even today they can still revert back to eating plants.
However, regarding being on the ark, there would have been young animals (before breeding age), and they (like animals today) would have a latent ability to hibernate or aestivate. Skunks, bees, snakes, and groundhogs to name a few outside of bears and bats are the most well-known. Making them easy to care for and tend to on an Ark. Especially young small ones.
Also consider animals repopulate FAST and speciate FAST, and predators are always a low population anywhere you go in the world. We already know this bottleneck occurred anyone because of the new study that found ALL life arose at the same time from a world wide bottleneck. It was discovered looking at the CO1 gene in mtDNA. I even made a video on that as well. Nothing is much of a mystery anymore.
@@oldcountryboy what if they had a lot of supply on their boat?
Marine fossils are found in nearly ALL STRATA!
Including on the highest mountain peaks.
Lake Titicaca contains seahorses, sea Kelp - DESPITE being within a very high mountain range ; as well as being surrounded by salt flats!!
Truly amazing, and beautiful place!
I'm surprised no comments this is pretty awesome that science is actually being non bias
But where are the fossils of the thousands of people who died? The animals - horses, cattle, rabbits, mice, birds? That’s always been a puzzlement for me.
Because there's a gap of Millions of years. The nearest you would find today would be the buried remains in Pompey; hundreds trapped under volcanic ash. In many more Millions of years, today's cemeteries would be seen as a fossil layer. Bones are constantly being unearthed in archeological digs, but they aren't old enough to have fossilised.
Sounds like what you would have if there was waves of water and mud washing back and forth all over the world. There have been instances where entire trees were found standing through all the layers of strata.
I used to work for a team of archaeologists, paleontologists and ethnologists, logging fossils and other admin work. That storage room brings back wonderful memories. Of course we never had dinosaur fossils as we were in California. Some large cats and other animals, but mostly pottery, tools, etc. So sad when they dispersed.
If the deluge is true, we should find human fossils among dinosaurs fossiles in the same layers. Do we ?
Have any dinosaur fossils been found in the Grand Canyon layers? If so, how close to the top or bottom of canyon were they found?
Not a single bone or tooth of any kind has been found in the Grand Canyon.
check out GrandCanyonMovie.com
This is a perfect example of how as we gain in knowledge so does the history of our planet. For those who can't accept new ideas and theory are just closed minded and most often proved wrong. History must be fluid ever changing as our knowledge increases.
@Darth Quantum
"The problem with your statement is that it's the religious who are close-minded."
Demonstrably false. A creationist can consider whether a particular phenomenon has a natural or a supernatural cause. He is open-minded. A naturalistic scientist cannot consider whether it had a supernatural cause. His mind is closed to that option.
"The rest of us are willing to go to wherever the evidence leads."
Simply not true. The principle of _methodological naturalism_ does not allow going to a supernatural explanation even if the evidence leads that way. As Dr. Scott Todd wrote in _Nature,_ "Even if all the data point to an intelligent designer, such a hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not naturalistic." That is, they will _not_ follow the evidence if it leads to an intelligent designer.
I'm confused. I thought the flood killed the dinosaurs suddenly so wouldn't that have buried them all in the same layer?
At 8:30 Prof Chadwick states that there was a major catastrophic event, and all the animals all died at the same time. But at 6"20 he states the Tyrannosaurs came in after the duck bills had died and scavenged on them. Also, if they all died in the great flood, why are there no bones of any animals after the KT boundary.
Rob perhaps it took many months for the flood waters to start drowning the animals . Perhaps They ate what was already drowned or damaged by falling trees.
Also alot of dinosaurs went in the arc, but obv as a baby version, otherwise it wouldnt fit. So although alot of animals died, they didnt go exstinct. Right after the flood, they got out of the arc and could eat the remains of the dead people and animals that didnt get burried.
A while ago I was staggered with the fact that I had never conceived in my mind what the earth's watering system would have looked like and how it would have worked prior to the flood. When I did give it some serious thought, it seemed reasonable that most of the vast volumes of rounded rock, from small pebbles right up to boulders the size of a car, were formed within that system, then it was spewed out at the time of the flood when "all the fountains of the great deep were broken up”.
I just found petrified crocadile teeth and back plates at Venince beach florida so cool !
The dislikes in this video are people in Australia trying to like the video
not so fast mate .... I like it !
Didn't you know that northern hemisphere bias means that the world is normally pictured the wrong way up? Australia is actually on top of the world and Europe and North America on the bottom! :-) See here: i.pinimg-dot-com/originals/6a/dd/23/6add23c1fc46b9ad204a6216144dbf96.jpg
xxxchurch100 he was joking. You know you all down there are upside down. Backwards. You clicked the dislike because from down there it it a thunks up 👍👎 see?
Philip Rayment a 👎 as viewed from Australia would be a 👍! He was joking.
Goodness Aussies are sensitive! Must be from standing on your head so much! 🤣🤣🤣
Seriously the earth is Flat so there is no upside down. 😊
@@PJRayment
Yes, just like Paul Hogan said in his tv day's "the reason Australia is down under is because of all the iron we have here, it made the Earth tip and so we are not down under but up over"...
Interesting, l would like to see a live one to see how they move and sound. Like the way he explained the layers of fossils.
where are human fossils from the flood?
Absolutely awesome, one has to have a critically thinking brain to appreciate this.
Why would different dino species be buried in different layers, I wonder. I would *assume* instead that, were they deposited via Noah's flood, they would all be mixed together, at least to some degree (perhaps the top layer dinos were able to reach higher ground during the flood and thus survived the longest; nevertheless, surely not uniformly). Perhaps the later top-layer dinos were somehow more buoyant? I wonder if the same pattern is found everywhere, or only at this particular dig site.
Appreciated the commentary. Thank you.
They all died in the great flood in the Bible including the Giants that they don't never talk about giant humanoid bones
Were there any fossil remains of the flying reptiles found in this area? Or were they found in higher altitudes?
Unfortunately, to date, no flying reptiles have been found in the Hanson Ranch bonebed, the quarry where Chadwick and his team are excavating or concurrent fossil sites in the immediate area. They have found a few fossils belonging to birds, however.
Dr. Chadwick does a good job explaining the results of the Noahic flood and the evidences that support it.
I love to hear Dr. Chadwick speak--he reminds me of Clint Eastwood's younger, more affable brother! Thank you for posting these, God Bless you!
Lol. I saw it too.
Haha. I am sure Dr. Chadwick would get a kick out of your comment. He is a very easy going and nice man. Next time I see him I will try to remember to show him your comment.
I have often wondered why there is not also a massive graveyard of the remains of the enormous population of people that perished in the Genesis flood. Maybe there is and I have not been apprised of such.
By one man's sin, death entered the world
And by another man's death, we have eternal freedom. And that wasn't a normal man, but God himself!
It seems likely the first layer is the initial wave, and the next layers are succeeding waves, which would create definition between layers of varied materials, then there's backwash and run off. The layers are used to indicate time, but I think it's just layers from one big process, and also standing water left in low areas.
I once heard that parts of the earths mantle were found on the moon - if so would you consider doing a program about that?
That would be because it is believed that a large planetoid sized object hit the earth during its formation which ejected material into orbit which then became the moon
is it possible that they could have died in the wake of the Yellowstone super volcano explosion being they were grouped close together in Wyoming.
Creation, it's exactly what it sounds like. They were created just like we were created.
You're not an accident quit believing them.
Bonebeds are known worldwide. Question: why don´t you find dinosaur fossils together with those of mammals if they allegedly lived at the same time??? Why don´t you find anything that indicates the presence of men in cretaceous and older bonebeds (bones, debris) ? The simple answer: because humans didn´t exist at that time. Another question: how much time did it take to depostit f.e. a meter of sediment? Answer: it varies heavily. The intact whale fossil does not indicate automaticlý that it was burried fast. It indicates an enviroment where a. there where no scavengers and b. the conditions where that the body stayed intact when it was covered in sediment. That could have taken place in a rather quiet part of the ocean without strong currents. In his publcation he ist talking about "diatomaceous sediments" which indicates the opposite of a strong water movement. And the video from 13:50 - 15:00 sounds a lot like evolution to me.
"why don´t you find dinosaur fossils together with those of mammals if they allegedly lived at the same time???"
You do. But the secular world downplays that fact.
"Why don´t you find anything that indicates the presence of men in cretaceous and older bonebeds (bones, debris) ?"
Possibly because God said that he wanted to wipe out all trace of men, or something along those lines. Or likely because humans had a better ability to escape the rising floodwaters for longer, so were not buried in the same layers.
"The simple answer: because humans didn´t exist at that time."
Yes, I guess that is a simple answer. Doesn't mean that it's the right answer, though.
"The intact whale fossil does not indicate automaticlý that it was burried fast. It indicates an enviroment where a. there where no scavengers and b. the conditions where that the body stayed intact when it was covered in sediment."
Where are there no scavengers, even insects and smaller creatures? And what are those conditions that caused it to stay intact. Modern observations are that bodies are scavenged and rot and etc. very quickly (days to weeks). But observed sedimentation is _much_ slower than that.
"And the video from 13:50 - 15:00 sounds a lot like evolution to me."
I know what you mean, but it also sounds a lot like the order that things would be buried in the flood.
And about the whales, to be untouched could mean that the creature was encapsulated by the sediment that was loosened by the water itself that displaced the whale from known seas to land. I could see that...
You have done some great video's, thank's for the work you've done.
Watch more of the videos because they build your understanding. Or you can watch the longer videos that last over an hour. There are some good ones with a geologist who's very excited to pass on his very acurate interesting scientific knowledge. God bless!
Thank you for such educational videos. God bless.
So what does one end up doing with 20k dinosaur bones? Will there be an end purpose for them other than keeping them in labeled drawers?
7:58 fossil graveyard, global catastrophic event, massive compilation
Remember an Ice Age came to an end about 12,000 years ago. Many floods occured around that time. The glaciers are gone, hence melted.
Well y'all are getting closer the Bible let's us know that the Earth is less than 7,000 years old and man did walk with dinasaurs and off course we. We didn't evolve from apes , Adam was probably the smartest man ever , even though he did listen to his wife instead of God. Their are so many ways that disprove Earth being billions of years old but atleast they are starting to tell it closer to the truth.
The Earth is a great deal older than seven thousand years, man most certainly did not walk with dinosaurs and, no matter how many people attempt to deny it, the evidence does indicate that we did evolve from primitive apes. Hard to believe that someone could be so wrong about so many things with just one post but ignorance knows no bounds.
He should see if there are any blood cells in the bones like Dr. Mary Schweitzer.
It's discussed in this video. ua-cam.com/video/ykwgE9MlNCs/v-deo.html
Dr. Mary Schweitzer seems to be a subject to search by herself!
Why specific animals in specific layers? Why are seeing only a specific mix of animals in very specific layers, stacked in the exact same order EVERYWHERE? Should not we find lots of mammalian fossils like mammoths, giant sloths, camels, bears, sabertooth cats, etc. Even a rat or some other rodent. Some, any, sign of mammals, and at least a bird or two? At least once in a while we should have a mixing of animals normally found in different layers within the same layer and the same kind of rock. Do we?
Thank you for the work, it’s so instructive
I love Dr. Chadwick, he’s such an amazing and sweet man. One day I need to sit down and talk with him. I can’t wait to watch this.
15:10 what caused this burial process.....
Massive tidal waves or tsunamis, the actions which created the flood also caused pole shift. Axis wobble, and but understood by having two people the first clasping both hands into a ball indicative of the earth. The second placing their hands loosely around the hands of the first. representing 2 miles of water. At this point, the first person rocks the inner hands and you will see where the Tidal Waves came from.
Noah’s flood caused it. The fountains of the deep started it by The Lord. This killed off the sea animals first. They were buried first . Scalled to death by 900 degree water from 10 miles down under the sea floor. Psalms 74:13-14. This water blew out of there like a pressure cooker and flooded the earth. The evidence of this can still be seen in the bottom of the ocean. It is called the Mid Oceanic Ridge. It is 40,000 long and goes around the whole Earth. This flooded the earth along with 40 days of rain.
Since the bones are in clay/silt and not rock, are the bones fossilized? If not what preservation is done to stop the rotting?
I have a question. If Noah's flood covered the entire earth, where did all the water go afterward? Serious question
@greggd2027 Great question! The short answer is that the water is still here. According to the catastrophic plate tectonics Flood model, there was a sudden increase in seafloor spreading rates worldwide at the beginning of the Flood. This shallowed the ocean basins and displaced the seawater, causing it to gradually rise and cover the continents. When seafloor spreading decreased toward the end of the Flood, sea levels dropped as the seawater returned to the ocean basins. Please see the following article for more information about the catastrophic plate tectonics model:
answersingenesis.org/geology/plate-tectonics/catastrophic-plate-tectonics-global-flood-model-of-earth-history/
Is this area dated to the same time as the grave yard in Alaska that has all the mammoths fossils?
Greetings @bluesdirt6555,
This fossil site (called the Hanson Ranch Bonebed) occurs in Cretaceous rock layers. These layers are very thick and extensive, so we think were formed during the Flood. Mammoth fossils typically occur in layers of unlithified (unhardened) sediment overlying the rock layers containing dinosaur fossils. This suggests that the mammoths lived after the Flood, most likely during the Ice Age that lasted for several centuries after the Flood had ended. You can check out this video on our UA-cam channel for more information: ua-cam.com/video/R2LQIMBTGzY/v-deo.html
"Taphonomist Arthur Chadwick shows us his collection of 20,000 fossils,"
Are any of them fossils of human beings found in the same strata as the dinosaur fossils? Any fossils of bears or rabbits or horses or cattle?
Good questions!
I don't know about that, but there are a mass majority of fish fossils in dry areas.
A fossil parrot has been found in the same strata as dinosaurs. As have fossils of mammals.
You can’t be asking tough questions like that here. That might offend someone with a closed mind!
@@yahushua7773 Fish do have a tendency to die when there is no water ;) Actually, in those areas of the Earth where there is frequent rain there is also erosion, destroying the fossils that might have been there. We find fish fossils in areas which are NOW dry because the layers containing them were not washed away by weather.
Thank you. Hopefully these entries will not end up being erased from UA-cam.
Just a question,,outside of an asteroid,,what's the possibility of a giant tsunami ,, back then there were still huge volcanoes even in the ocean.
You need to get some of the giant nephilim bones and skulls to add to your collection. Hopefully Smithsonian didn't 'lose' all of them.
@@JB-yb4wn Jesus said he was not of this world so he was an alien ttechnically
Im pretty sure i had a nephilim bone when i was a kid, my dog stole it from a very secretive dig the government was doing close to our house. Im not into strange spiritual stuff... But that big piece of bone had some super weird 'vibes' to it.
Absolutely fascinating. What a way to enjoy your life.
Thank you so much for this wonderful high quality production.
This is what give Christians confidence for themselves and for our children. Many many thanks and May the Lord richly bless your endeavors.
I think the major takeaway from this video is the direction and planetary scale of sediment layering that does not follow the underlying landscape topology.
Just seeing how God designed these animals is amazing
The shear costs of the rack that store those fossils is staggering; probably saw more in value than my home (land included) many times over. Kind of like 100’s of Snap-On Tool chests. 😂
lol..I was just thinking the same thing
Yep.
What was the date of this flood?
I'm just curious but, unicorn is mentioned 9 times in the scriptures. What's your honest take?
I believe those "unicorns" are a special 1 horned rhino.. WHat do you think? 👍
The "unicorn" is a mistranslation by the King James translators.
It's mentioned in the Authorised Version of the Bible, but that is a translation issue. The Hebrew word does not indicate one horn, and it probably refers to a type of ox. See creation . com/the-unicorn (remove the two space)
@@PJRayment Did the unicorns miss the boat!?! Must be why they are no longer around!!
What would pressure of weight do to the evidence of layer disruption?
T CR, you wrote, "What would pressure of weight do to the evidence of layer disruption?"
Be more specific.
Dan
Did they find any mammal or human fossils?
? since we see the dinosaurs or some fossils from the flood, shouldn't there be people from the time of Noah fossilized as well?
I used to wonder this as well. God wanted to destroy mankind at the time because we had been tainted with Nephilim DNA. That’s my theory, anyway. I’m sure he wanted absolute destruction with not one trace left
Humans would have had a greater ability to escape the rising flood waters, and therefore would not have been buried as soon/readily.
Good question, but consider the number of people alive at the time, WAY low compared to animals which have FAST generation times and speciate. Also, humans have a subcutaneous layer of fat under our skin which makes us float when we die. So the humans buried early on in the flood that didn't get a chance to float were probably made into oil and we actually have evidence of man with dinosaur its just suppressed. I made a video on it actually = ua-cam.com/video/eN463CvOM9c/v-deo.html
Just above the Yucatan Peninsula there is a huge impact crater. Could this impact be the trigger that breaks up the "Pangaea" giant continent, creating the continental drift, and causing the world wide flood in the process? So far, all the evidence you have presented for a global flood indicates that the Ark had a wild ride.
So the Flood was able to create layer sequences that have the most primitive sea creatures at the bottom, ascending to fish, then land animals , and ultimately the dinosaurs right through the Triassic, Jurassic and finally the Cretaceous ? Kind of a sieve-like effect which has ( understandably, but mistakenly ) given paleontologists the impression of life having developed slowly over great tracts of time?
Just wondering why no human bones?
Any human remain found with dinosaur bones?
how old all these fossils?
Why don't we have giant valley in New York area like Grand Canyon after great flood?
No rock bed.
Very well studied and research. Thank you all for such an informative video.
I think the theory of polar reversals propagated by Daniel Voht and others explains the deaths and burial of these species.
unimaginable earthquakes would have occurred. could explain the up thrust formations
When was the 1st dinosaur fossil found?
Sometime after Darwin's Theory of Evolution.
Sir Richard Owen (who disagreed with Darwin's ideas) coined the term in 1841, after studying some dinosaur fossil bones, but how long before that they were discovered I don't know.
Ancient Greeks recorded finding enormous bones, they attributed them to titans.
Amazing as always! ❤️🙏🏽✝️
Triceratops, my favorite Dino😊
Mine are the DinoBots
This is an truly amazing. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. The Bible is telling the Truth, literally. Do you know Dr Myeong Hyun Kim in Korea? He is also studying Biblical science and go all over the country to teach about these very scientific findings to tell the people that the Bible is the TRUTH. The LORD bless you.
There were giants, (Nephilim) on the earth in those days, have any fossils of them been discovered?
Thank You
In the beginning God created the Heaven and earth, enough said
Why is there no human fossils mixed with them?
I am sincerely interested in this, I'd love to learn more
TY!
I was from the badlands south east Montana. On our property we picked up basketful of fossils of fish, shells, ferns.
Been to Utah and Wyoming dinosaur country. I remember being in Cleveland, WY. Awesome
At the time of the dinosaurs Triassic , Jurassic, Cretaceous. We are talking millions of years. Pole shifts is a possible theory.
Any soft tissue in any of them bones?
He said the toothmark was from a scavenger. So a scavenger picked at them nothing else messed with the bone so it was able to fossilize?
Hard to understand how he failed to find much bioturbation or roots. I have studied many outcrops ofJurassic and Cretaceous rocks in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming. Bioturbation and roots are extremely common and there are many published examples.
I think you misunderstood the layers missing the turbation he was talking about wasn't the layers the fossils was in but the layers that covered them. Suggesting that something catastrophic over a short period of time was a factor in ending the Cretacious period as well as other periods like the Jurassic. That it wasn't a long process taking millions of years.
So who are you and show us what you digged up? Not sure about your honesty.
Did he not mentioned it seems that that specific bone collection were transported to that spot. Its not the original place of death.
Naturally the floodwater separated materials.
@@kenjett2434 My experience is that bioturbation is pervasive and indicates many long periods of very slow deposition. Check out his comments starting at about 17:30. He clearly states that he does not find any evidence of roots or burrows of thousands of m of sediment. I have studied many outcrops and found this highly suspect.
@@antonloubser He stated there were many layers with fossils that were transported, and then scavenged. In other words, time between the layers. There is abundant evidence that the transport was done by rivers. The sedimentology of the sandstones pretty much proves this.
I have 30 years experience as a professional geologist specializing in paleontology (taphonomy) and stratigraphy, working mostly in the petroleum business. In petroleum geology the evidence is overwhelming for an ancient earth. What a lot of people don't realize is that the science unraveling the evolution of the earth has major economic implications.
And, just for the record, I am very honest. My wife has learned never to ask my opinion about her clothing because I will tell her.
Howard F, you wrote, "Hard to understand how he failed to find much bioturbation or roots. I have studied many outcrops ofJurassic and Cretaceous rocks in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming. Bioturbation and roots are extremely common and there are many published examples."
That is the first I have heard of that, and I am an old man who was an evolutionist for most of his life. Do you have any references?
Dan
Great staff
Love it
Why call the layer the Cretaceous?
It was just one deposit of various sediment during the flood.
The number of organisms necessary to produce the number of shells deposited in some of the chalk deposits are more than the sea could support, by many orders of magnitude. These things can be measured, and no, no single flood could be responsible for the sedimentary rock formations of the world. There is no process by which the particular different layers could be laid down sequentially, and no source for those materiels that doesn't require thousands to millions of years to collect.
That is what it is known as, so from a practical point of view, it's useful to refer to it as that.
Each period in earth history is named for a type location somewhere in the world. Cretaceous is in France, named for the Latin name for chalk. Devonian comes from Devon, England. The reason all these names are useful is that the order of fossils is about the same world wide. And so it is useful to have names for the different levels in that succession. Even within the Cretaceous there are 12 stages, recognized mostly by the succession of coccoliths that is recognized world wide.
That's what the evolutionists call it so it's a point of reference. That's my guess.
It might be a way for him to classify fossils. He might agree with the sequence of deposition but not the timescale.
If the Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous layers happen at different times and produced different types of fossils then that would suggest many different floods not just one.
Perhaps it was because the marine animals were buried first along with marine plants, then the land animals were buried under more moving sediments and tree bark. The waves and mud going forward and back again cause more burials at different levels. Volcanoes were erupting in the oceans and on land spilling out more lava, rock, water, mud caused mor burials over a years time.
Check out the floating forests theory. Explains the layering of marine to terrestrial animals.
So why are there no human bones in there with those dinosaur bones? Heck I would settle for wolf, buffalo, elephant, horse, cow or any other mammals as well.
Great! Thank you for sharing.
Great video! I love seeing evidence that the Bible is true. I hope this kind of work becomes more and more widely dispersed, overturning the mainstream consensus about evolution. Keep us the good work!
Me as well, I am spreading YEC hard, check out my stuff I am new :)
Great 👍🏻 information thanks for your science.
very interesting. Yet, say one were an evolutionist, how would they interpret the data that Dr. Chadwick presented? And what might be your counter-argument (rebuttal)?
My counter-argument would, of course, depend on their argument, but it would likely include the fact that evolutionary science is done on the basis that only natural explanations are acceptable, a concept labelled "methodological naturalism", and it is therefore biased, and using naturalistic science to argue against the biblical account is a circular argument, which is logically invalid. That is, naturalistic science will reject explanations involving the supernatural _even if the evidence favours the supernatural explanation._
I did my PhD on taphonomy so I will answer. First he stated that there were several bone beds at different times, so not just one event. Then he stated that the carcasses were scavenged, so that had to take some time between the events.
I have not worked on these bone beds, but I have worked a lot in the Jurassic Morrison Formation in Utah, which also has a lot of dino bones. In that formation the evidence that rivers transported the sediment and bones is overwhelming. I can go into the sedimentology but there are many papers published on this. There is also great evidence for ancient soils in the Morrison, such as insect burrows and roots, exactly the type of evidence Chadwick says would indicate lots of time.
trust in the Lord with all one's heart and lean not unto your own understanding.. all men are destined to die and then the judgement.
last time I checked we all just woke up here one day, and it can get a whole lot worse ..
@@howardf5264
"First he stated that there were several bone beds at different times, so not just one event."
The flood lasted a year, so would have included multiple episodes of deposition and erosion. That detail doesn't refute the flood.
"Then he stated that the carcasses were scavenged, so that had to take some time between the events."
Which could also have happened during that period.
"…the evidence that rivers transported the sediment and bones is overwhelming."
When you say "rivers", what's the evidence that it was rivers as we know them and not larger bodies of moving water?
"I can go into the sedimentology but there are many papers published on this."
In fact no widespread sedimentology has ever been observed that is deep enough to bury even small living things.
@Darth Quantum
"Leo, there are videos on YT refuting this nonsense."
Except that it's not nonsense.
"Creationist arguments haven't changed since Gish and Morris. They keep repeating the same mantra no matter how many times it's been disproven."
Apart from getting more and more evidence making the case even stronger. And no, it has not been disproven. Telling someone that they are wrong does not make it wrong.
"Saying it over and over doesn't make it true. Honestly, it's childish."
True. Yet anti-creationists keep saying over and over that the creationists are wrong. It's childish, because they rarely actually even try to show that they are wrong, just as you haven't done so here.
"Those of us who do actual science don't have time to waste on these people."
"These people" also do actual science.
"I don't know a single astronomer (and ,yes, I personally know several) who would engage a debate with a … religious nut who thinks the universe is only 6000 years old because that's how he interprets some ancient book."
Perhaps because you live in an anti-creationist bubble. And are ignorant of the fact that there are genuine astronomers who are creationists, and they are not "nuts". But then name-calling is typical of anti-creationists. That's another thing, like repeating oneself, that doesn't make it true.
Further, that "ancient book" is widely believed, with good reason, to be an reliable source of history written for us by God.
"…a debate would only give them a platform, an air of legitimacy they don't deserve and haven't earned."
No, the real problem is that a debate would expose that the evolutionists' arguments are weak.