What is Project Rudy in College Football?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 жов 2024
- As "Project Rudy" gets plenty of attention around the college football world this week, what is it? Heartland College Sports' Pete Mundo and Bryan Clinton discuss what is it, how it could change college football and what it means for the Big 12?
"The current system is becoming more and more of an exclusionary system," said a person who had seen the "Project Rudy" deck. "If you really want to highlight the value of college football as the second-most popular sport in the US, you can't do that and disenfranchise three quarters of the membership."
it would be interesting context to get your thoughts on B12 members and the tiers they might/could slot into. i've got no idea how each school sizes up in the media market(s).
Great call Tyler. We will work on this!
Thanks guys
Appreciate you watching and hope you'll subscribe!
Colorado is second in viewership this year . Like it or not .. they’re Tier 1
@@Baronsworlds1214 yeah just don’t know if it’s sustainable !
There is a cycling brand named “the Rudy project”. Makes great helmets and sunglasses.
This thing is oddly named.
The money is all about the MEDIA.....that's the bottom line. Amateur athletics is being destroyed, and College football has become a semi professional entity. CRAPOLA!!!
If it’s 70. Then probably OSU and WSU get in. Is it down to maybe Boise St or Tulane for that last spot?
Probably would be Oregon State & Wash State to avoid lawsuits
Good info Pete!!
@@jaymcclanahan353 thank you Jay!
Is this a good idea for college football???
No it's not and I'm in the Big 10 (Ohio State). This is a violation of 1890 Sherman Act (antitrust) and 14th amendment (equal protection). Remember, that colleges are schools and the 1954 Brown vs Topeka Board of Education dealt with separate but unequal in schools. That would be the same thing with the tier system.
@@CarlaJenkinsTV I could be way off here but I feel like it's not only the tier system but also closing the door on nearly half of the current FBS schools from the opportunity to compete at the highest level ( and earnings) would also be very problematic in regards to antitrust.
@kogo2951 Don't we do the same thing now, though, with FCS and JuCo? Would the remaining schools form their own league? Lots of questions. I've never thought of it from a constitutional standpoint. It's been mainly dealt with so subjectively for years, it's been somewhat of a monopoly as long as i can remember.
It's not a good idea, it's a F****N good idea!
It’s no longer relevant to ask that question cuz it’s here and inevitable
Project Rudy…sounds like sometching ND came up with…what’s the point of conferences then ?
Yormark for basketball commissioner!
He'd do great as Football commissioner as well!!!
Have you noticed that in the last 5 years, the education of a college athletes is no longer a priority? It's simply about money, money, greed, greed!? Disney is part of ESPN, so we are seeing the writing on the wall and which direction this is really going?
1) Thing that make sense don't guide realignment
2) IF they encourage parity rather than keeping the people on top on the top, I'd support it. But I didn't hear anything about encouraging parity.
Parity will come about over time. Like New England was a power house, now they suck. That will happen more in college with talent being distributed more because every team will have the same access to the playoffs. Performance will dictate the post season, no more committees. No more AP influence.
@@DeRochette I still don't like it. I think it was a mistake to officially make CFB a business. These are supposed to be amateur athletes. Many schools have done their best to keep up, but it is ridiculous now.
@DeRochette CFB needs to give losing teams some light advantage over winning teams. In the NFL, they give the losers the first picks in the draft. CFB has been the opposite: the winners get all the advantages so a small group of teams can stay on top far longer than they should.
@@SvdSinner I don't think it will happen in my lifetime. It is becoming a mill.
@kylesummers1565 they're not all amateur athletes. Many of them are semi pro, treat it as it is. Amateurs go down, semi pros goes up.
SEC should be paid more for playing a 9th game.
Tiers are nice but we just need to keep having the Bamas, Vols, Ol' Miss losing to "lesser teams". Parity is creeping into the big 2. Slowly, but coming.
P5 schools have to pay little schools for games. I think save millions instead of paying G5 schools. The minimum should he 50 mil instead of 30 mil in the bottome part of the P4.
Cal and Stanford are in the ACC b/c they’re bratty about educational status. They should be in the big 12 along w/SMU. They’re just biting themselves in the behind. IMHO.
Why should SMU be in the Big 12? Why do you think the current conference members would want yet another Texas school? A big point of contention amongst the old Big XII (10 members) was 40% of the schools were from Texas, and thus, one state had 40% of the voting power. I don't think anybody wants that again just a few years after getting Texas down to 25% of the members.
Also, SMU is a tiny private school for rich kids. Their small stadium is falling apart. I wouldn't mind another Big 12 home game in Dallas, but SMU just doesn't fit the conference.
@@nathank556 I’ll tell ya. In a second I would trade Cal Stanford and SMU to the XII and give away UCF Cincy and sadly WVU(I’m sure that fanbase would go berserk though to get back regional rivals). In a nano second. It’s ridiculous for Calford to travel like this. With no true rivals. SMU would get the xii the Dallas market. Make the SMU TCU rivalry a bigger deal and why not more in Texas? Remember the old SWC. All Texas teams and Arkansas.
@Mike-aka747 tell that to their research dollars. Also tell me, did Cal and Stanford get an invite from the B12??
@@DeRochette no invite. And those brat schools don’t want to be part of it. Let them travel thousands of miles. They’ll drain their budget someday and beg the XII on their knees for inclusion.
@Mike-aka747 from their pov, they'll take their billion research dollars and let you keep your petty football money. They only try to play football at a high level because they try to do everything at a high level. They think it helps them get the smartest people so they'd probably lose money with pleasure to be included.
I can't hate college football anymore then I do now maybe more will be too with this 🐴 shit. Comical