My only complaint (and I'm not sure when this was produced) is they mention proto-mammals, or "reptile-like mammals" were relatives of the reptile family. This is not true, our ancestors and reptile ancestors split early on into synapsids and diapsids, with the diapsids going on to become mammals and the synapsids reptiles like lizards, dinos, and their last remaining survivors, the birds.
@@denizen9998 Yes--I see what you mean. But the mistake, which seems to be widespread on UA-cam, is that stem or proto-mammals and proto-reptiles resembled each-other. Maybe that's justified in the most shallow, visual sense. But it's incorrect and misleading if we're aiming for objective taxonomy. The ancestral lines of reptiles and mammals both descended from the amniotes, shortly after amniotes evolved from early amphibians. It must have been an amazingly generative time for speciation, so it's extra important for us to honor the details as they get more granular since they illuminate previously dark ages and blind corners of early tetrapod history. Once the amniotes diverged from the water-dependent egg-layers, and then split again, they immediately formed the three great lineages of air-breathing, earth-traversing creatures that reign today: 1) the metamorphic amphibians, 2) the synapsid~mammalians and 3) the sauropsid~reptilians.
Sensational graphics. I'm currently reading a biography of Clarence Darrow. I've just started the discussion of the Scopes trial. It's hard to believe there are still people who disbelieve evolution.
They should make a clearer distinction between gliders and powered fliers. I wouldn't call early gliders the first flying mammals, at least not without making that distinction.
Earth is only about 6,000 years old if you have a hard time accepting that you have two ways you can research the truth one is the greatest history book ever written the holy Bible King James version two is a great UA-cam channel called ANSWERS IN GENESIS they have a series called the HEAVENS DECLARE
@Swinefeld you have been warned the path you take on from this day until you die and be judge by God will be whether you accept Jesus Christ as your savior and creator if you reject Jesus Christ you will be rejected into heaven and I pray that you and others don't accept that dark path to hell
@Swinefeld evidence is in the UA-cam series the heavens declare the one hour and 44 minute video called is Genesis history the UA-cam series called expedition Bible and as I said before the greatest history book ever written the holy Bible King James version there is so much more but that is a very good place to start you have been warned the path you take on from this day until you die and be judge by God will be whether you accept Jesus Christ as your savior and creator if you reject Jesus Christ you will be rejected into heaven and I pray that you and others don't accept that dark path to hell
@@jonathanmaestas2115 I am a Christian and I believe Jesus lived. I also believe in evolution we have the proof that dinosaurs lived we have their bones, pre-historic man lived we have their bones as well. What makes you think God didn't create dinosaurs before he created man? That is very arrogant thinking, we have the proof that you are WRONG! Also, who do you think you are? Your warning about being accepted into heaven sounds very much like a threat not a Christian teaching! You are not God or Jesus Christ, you have no idea if when people like Swinefeld or myself die that we will go to hell! We will absolutely go to heaven because God gave us the smarts to be scientific, to become doctors develop medicines to cure cancers, etc. What makes you so sure we are in the wrong. The bible was written by man. Word of mouth or stories handed down by superstition to explain the scary things man could not understand until science. Anyone who cannot accept this and threatens scientific minds are in my opinion is backward and evil! Your approach is very non Christian. Stop threating people your rhetoric sounds mean and nasty!
My only complaint (and I'm not sure when this was produced) is they mention proto-mammals, or "reptile-like mammals" were relatives of the reptile family. This is not true, our ancestors and reptile ancestors split early on into synapsids and diapsids, with the diapsids going on to become mammals and the synapsids reptiles like lizards, dinos, and their last remaining survivors, the birds.
The video is mistaken, yes--but actually it was sauropsids (diapsids) from which all reptiles descended; synapsids are the ancestors of mammals.
Well they made the distinction 5:40 of "reptile like mammals" rather than "mammal like reptiles" which is true. They are not calling them reptiles.
@@denizen9998 Yes--I see what you mean. But the mistake, which seems to be widespread on UA-cam, is that stem or proto-mammals and proto-reptiles resembled each-other. Maybe that's justified in the most shallow, visual sense. But it's incorrect and misleading if we're aiming for objective taxonomy. The ancestral lines of reptiles and mammals both descended from the amniotes, shortly after amniotes evolved from early amphibians. It must have been an amazingly generative time for speciation, so it's extra important for us to honor the details as they get more granular since they illuminate previously dark ages and blind corners of early tetrapod history.
Once the amniotes diverged from the water-dependent egg-layers, and then split again, they immediately formed the three great lineages of air-breathing, earth-traversing creatures that reign today: 1) the metamorphic amphibians, 2) the synapsid~mammalians and 3) the sauropsid~reptilians.
I found that it is from 2016 in the full video description.
To be fair, synapsids are a sister taxon to the sauropsids, making synapsids relatives of reptiles
Amazing graphical animation skills demonstrated. Excellent documentary.
Sensational graphics. I'm currently reading a biography of Clarence Darrow. I've just started the discussion of the Scopes trial. It's hard to believe there are still people who disbelieve evolution.
Extremely, it was an informative, wonderful archeological scientific documentary... Thanks for sharing this magnificent documentary 👍🏻 👏🏻 🙏
I loved and really enjoyed the animated narratives, thank you
Fascinating stuff!
They should make a clearer distinction between gliders and powered fliers. I wouldn't call early gliders the first flying mammals, at least not without making that distinction.
Great job, thanks for sharing 🙏
It is common for several different organisms to share a burrow. I don't know why this video is surprised by the presence of two in one.
they got that bit wrong but overall it was a great video
I saw and recognized about dawn of mammals the first time.
Genetics over fossil.. after all, more genetics, then fossils.
shame your budget is so low
Earth is only about 6,000 years old
if you have a hard time accepting that you have two ways you can research the truth
one is the greatest history book ever written the holy Bible King James version
two is a great UA-cam channel called ANSWERS IN GENESIS
they have a series called the HEAVENS DECLARE
Sorry but your delusional belief system is not scientific. It is, in fact, quite laughable.
@Swinefeld you have been warned the path you take on from this day until you die and be judge by God will be whether you accept Jesus Christ as your savior and creator if you reject Jesus Christ you will be rejected into heaven
and I pray that you and others don't accept that dark path to hell
@ I have chosen the correct path based on evidence and the scientific method. You have chosen foolishness based on superstition and folly.
@Swinefeld evidence is in the UA-cam series
the heavens declare
the one hour and 44 minute video called is Genesis history
the UA-cam series called expedition Bible
and as I said before the greatest history book ever written the holy Bible King James version
there is so much more but that is a very good place to start
you have been warned the path you take on from this day until you die and be judge by God will be whether you accept Jesus Christ as your savior and creator if you reject Jesus Christ you will be rejected into heaven
and I pray that you and others don't accept that dark path to hell
@@jonathanmaestas2115 I am a Christian and I believe Jesus lived. I also believe in evolution we have the proof that dinosaurs lived we have their bones, pre-historic man lived we have their bones as well. What makes you think God didn't create dinosaurs before he created man? That is very arrogant thinking, we have the proof that you are WRONG!
Also, who do you think you are? Your warning about being accepted into heaven sounds very much like a threat not a Christian teaching! You are not God or Jesus Christ, you have no idea if when people like Swinefeld or myself die that we will go to hell! We will absolutely go to heaven because God gave us the smarts to be scientific, to become doctors develop medicines to cure cancers, etc. What makes you so sure we are in the wrong. The bible was written by man. Word of mouth or stories handed down by superstition to explain the scary things man could not understand until science. Anyone who cannot accept this and threatens scientific minds are in my opinion is backward and evil!
Your approach is very non Christian. Stop threating people your rhetoric sounds mean and nasty!
An idiotic movie.
Why ?
idiotic means literally, uneducated....
You are idiotic
Ok troglodyte.
@@JohnnyNakatomihes or she probably crationist