Philadelphia Flyers 2024 NHL Draft Recap

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 сер 2024
  • Scouching Draft Recaps are back and up first are the Philadelphia Flyers! Will Scouch breaks down the crop of prospects the Flyers added in 2024 NHL Draft.
    Don't miss the next Scouching Live! Monday evenings at 8pm EST, and Thursday afternoons at 2pm EST. See you there!
    Get data tools, a private Discord server and secret streams with a Scouching.ca subscription!
    Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @scouching
    Grab NHL gear at Fanatics: fanatics.93n6tx.net/BX71Jx
    Curious about the world of the NCAA? Consider a PuckPreps.com subscription and support our work over there as well!
    Twitter: / scouching
    Instagram: / scouching_will
    Twitch: / scouching
  • Спорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @sportsfan_913
    @sportsfan_913 26 днів тому +5

    Absolutely loved the Powell pick. Legit upside which is great for where they got him. Also a terrific story & easy kid to root for.

  • @cantgame9054
    @cantgame9054 26 днів тому +6

    ITS THAT TIME OF THE YEAR BABYYYYYY

  • @sportsfan_913
    @sportsfan_913 26 днів тому +3

    I thought they swung for upside. Took quite a few toolsy/raw players. Either gonna pay off massively or be a disastrous draft to look back on.

  • @cmz5847
    @cmz5847 25 днів тому

    I really wanted Helenius

  • @GoAvsGo87
    @GoAvsGo87 26 днів тому +1

    Love your recap videos! Looking forward to your take on the Avs draft class.

  • @omarrezk8605
    @omarrezk8605 26 днів тому +2

    love these vids

  • @alex__2265
    @alex__2265 26 днів тому +2

    Purely a guess but I felt they took guys they feel will fill out the lineup after Luchanko because next yr in what's supposed to be a better draft they should have six top 45 picks which could be a major addition of talent to the pipeline.

  • @markusv.146
    @markusv.146 26 днів тому +1

    Buium aside, what's your opinion on the Flyers taking Luchanko over Helenius as they are both centers?

  • @slipperynodd578
    @slipperynodd578 25 днів тому

    Started with one of the weaker drafts, interesting.
    I think you were very generous with a 2C with how much of a reach Jett is.

    • @johncody7109
      @johncody7109 25 днів тому +1

      How much of a reach is it actually in a mediocre draft? Even button had him at 12 in May. If they wanted a centre, it was really either him or Helenius at that point. I don't think the separation there is huge, and Helenius is a safer pick, but I think they see Jett might have more offensive upside when hes actually on a roster that isn't just him carrying the team. Both guys in my eyes are 2C's.

  • @jakepelling8551
    @jakepelling8551 26 днів тому

    Bring me Calgary!!!!

  • @johncody7109
    @johncody7109 25 днів тому

    I called the Jett pick as soon as Button made his list in May. Speed, hockey IQ, and great athleticism. Considering the apples he puts up on the PP, they probably see him as a guy who can setup Michkov. It will be like the Giroux pick, when everyone was sour and bitter at the moment, and then in a few years we forget about not taking Sanguinetti.
    With the rest, I do like Powell probably the second most from the list. Gill....meh. I mean I feel like we already have a better version in Hunter. At the end of the day, this draft was mediocre as a whole, and if the strategy is to push the chips in for 2025....I'm all there for it.

  • @bapjap
    @bapjap 26 днів тому +1

    Why is there a ‘negative’ stigma regarding size? Seems like a bunch of these amateur scouts value other attributes over size

    • @coltondaly2316
      @coltondaly2316 26 днів тому

      There's no negative stigma surrounding size. The stigma is when scouts pick size over skill and translatable traits

    • @Scouching
      @Scouching  26 днів тому +1

      The principle issue is how much the size of a player is weighed relative to current ability to perform. On many occasions teams appear to take lanky players who are further behind their cohort in ability and output in the hopes that as they age and get heavier, they'll be able to carve a role.
      The fallacy to me is that this ignores the development of the players that are ahead of them, and that in hockey, while size is a factor, it's no guarantee of anything whatsoever.