Leave a comment on this video with your opinion. Is this just Apple being greedy? Do they have any legitimate excuses for doing this? Will you even notice the difference?
HONESTLY? The slowdown on SSD upon choosing the base models should've been disclosed upon purchase (like, leaving a footnote upon checkout.) Apple should've at least be transparent and state these changes on the customers. But out of all things, I do not expect transparency on an arrogant Apple. Heck, they even STOPPED disclosing read/write speeds on their storage anymore that's outside of their Mac Pro. lineup.
The chip shortage may probably have played a role into this, but on the case of SSDs it's much more affordable now than recent (and I'm not even mentioning that exorbitant Apple Tax they incur on those options.) The larger reason? Lower manufacturing costs and raising prices to gain more profit margins. Basically the same tactic, and the reason why iPhones began to be more and more and more expensive despite the manufacturing costs quoted as lower than previous iterations.
And no matter how much we complain about their prices (and Apple cheapening out on features) at the end of the day, people will still buy it for that brand name alone.
Bro your videos are improving. Raise your front camera little high it looks like you’re looking down plus include more medium and close shots from main front camera not only wide shots. When using 2nd camera or B roll be consistent looking at main camera. Also add smooth zoom when making a point about something specific. I see you use teleprompter but it looks natural the way you speak! Sorry couldn’t resist myself writing this comment!
The slow SSDs in the M2 Macs were disappointing, but the slow SSDs in the M2 Pro/Max Macs are straight up insulting! These are "PRO" machines, Apple has no excuse for saving two bucks on the SSD!
You gotta understand apple is not ferrari and must cut BOM to save money to please shareholders. Ferrari can use the best tech and materials because their customers can pay.
Base M2 pro is 10-core Cpu and its performance is slightly better than M1 pro 10-core which it cost was 200$ more. Watch the comparison video test by Luke Miani who explains it well
As far as I know Apple has not acknowledged this new configuration and/or the slower read/write speed while commanding the same price of 200$ for 256 GB which is about 4-5 times higher than the market price for this size of SSD. Moreover, once you bought it you would have to live with it since Apple does not allow for any change in the configuration. I think that this is why Apple did it. It is win-win for Apple: If you do not like your configuration you would have to sell and buy again with more RAM and/or a bigger SSD. It is very sad that one of the most valuable companies in the world behaves as a cheep store where you have to ask 100 times to be sure that you are paying for the product you were told you were getting. Another point is that Apple and others would continue behaving like that if they are not told that this is unacceptable, i.e., it does not matter if one would or would not notice the difference because of that he/she received/paid not the same product that was advertised.
The SSD speeds wouldn't be an issue at all really if the cost to upgrade wasn't so high. It's £200 just for a measly extra 512gb and if its extra RAM you want, apple are charging £400 to double your 16Gb to 32... Madness.
@@JeGo9 yeah I agree, a shame though that every new Mac purchase comes with compromises (for me at least), rather than be ripped off by Apple’s exorbitant upgrade prices.
The bigger issue than just the read/write speeds is that since the nand chips are soldered, having less of them decreases the lifespan of the chip and ur computer as a whole. Its not only increasing profit margins, but will force customers to upgrade their computers sooner, cus once the ssd goes up, ur whole computer is shot. Even if you can find a tech who is willing to do the solder job, theres no way to purchase a brand new nand chip for the macs specific bga, so youd have to use a refurbished nand chip. This whole situation is really ugly and disappointing.
Larger NAND chips have longer lifespans though. One 256GB SSD has a longer lifespan than two 128GB SSDs, despite the former being the slower configuration. This shouldn't really be a concern however, as you're more likely to replace one of these computers years before their SSDs would fail.
@@TomlinsonHolman52583 Thats not true SLC chips have longer life and thats because they re more expensive but apple use the cheaper. TLC chips. SLC Chips are used in very high end ssd like memblaze. You dont know how many M1 macs are dead because faulty SSD. Secondary storage ssd can last more but not system ssd
Got the MBA m2 with 16gb of ram after knowing abt the slow SSD. So far Ive only seen macOS use swap once. I always leave abt a dozen apps opened including 2 browsers with multiple tabs on each and overall performance has been smooth. So between the ram and the SSD upgrade, I'd recommend the ram.
Well said. Many YT "experts" have been saying to update 256GB to 512GB, but they are missing the point; the lack of RAM slows the system, not the SSD. We can always use an external SSD if you need more storage, but RAM is not upgradeable.
Exactly! I went from Intel 2020 MacBook Air and went straight to the M2 MacBook Air 15 inch with 24GB Ram and 256 SSD storage and its a definite powerhouse! Especially with the educational discount!
I was thinking that I’ll buy the Air M1 (for coding purpose) but recently it was discontinued from apple website…then just have the option with Air M2, but the problem is it’s slow SSD. Firstly is the SSD really that much slow…will effect me? Then should I update the SSD or RAM (to 16GB)?
@@codewithsoham Definitely get the 16gb option. The SSD is not slow enough to be noticeable. It is only a problem when you, for example, export a long video in premiere pro or when you transfer gigabytes of data from the internal SSD to another drive. If you need more storage, it is way cheaper to get an external thunderbolt SSD enclosure and a gen 3 SSD than upgrading the internal SSD.
I've got the base model M2 MacBook Air, and I knew going in that about the SSD speed issue. Since the MBA is my travel device and I have a Mac desktop for the heavy lifting it hasn't been an issue for me (i.e., no swap filing so far).
two reasons - one, to bring the base model in at a lower price point, given than most people going for this base model aren't likely to be audio or video pros - and for whom the base price is key - second (smaller reason) , last year there was still a shortage of ssd chips - so putting in a single chip rather than 2 helped Apple guarantee they could bring the new M2 to market on time and in sufficient quantities.
Normally I wouldn’t care about a slower SSD, however, for Apple silicon systems it DOES matter how fast your internal storage is because of swap memory, like mentioned already on the video, especially considering modern applications simply requiere more RAM and RAM is at a premium in this situation, both because it costs an unreasonable amount of money to upgrade from a base model, but also because this is SHARED memory with the GPU, which means the OS has even LESS memory available as it has to share it. Anyway, I guess we can only dream of Apple being cheap and giving their “Pro” models more pro specs next time.
In benchmarks your theory didn’t play out. Look at MaxTech channel comparing base model 14” M1 Pro vs M2 pro. The base model M2 pro with slower SSD was faster in every single test but one. Also the “slower” SSD is faster for small random reads and writes. This UA-camr only discussed sequential burst speeds, which is actually less important for most common tasks.
@@Teluric2 What are you talking about? MaxTech has been incredibly critical of Apple about this issue and fueling and exploiting the outrage for clicks/views at every chance they get. Clearly you haven’t even watched their videos about the topic. In any event, here is what their tests found: -Disk Speed Sequential test: New base models slower -Disk Speed Random test: New base models faster -Geekbench: New base models 20% faster -Web browsing: New base models 14% faster -Figma web design: New base models 20% faster -Cinebench: New base models 23% faster -3dmark: New base models 22% faster -GFXBench 1440p: New base models 25% faster -GFXBench 4K: New base models 24% faster -Blender: New base models 45% faster -Lightroom: New base models faster - “Even though the SSDs are slower, it was 3 seconds faster” -4K HEVC Encoding: No difference - “Slower” SSD did not have any performance impact -4K ProRes Raw: New base models faster - “What if we make it harder”. “It looks like the M2 Pro is still faster” So clearly it has very little impact for most tasks, as in most tasks over 3000 MB/s is more than enough speed, and not the limiting factor to performance (CPU, GPU, RAM or otherwise is)
Certainly RAM should be upgraded, but doesn’t adding an external SSD with faster than onboard read/write speeds resolve this situation? Great video, as always!
Apple should (imo) have released an actively cooled MacBook Air M2 alongside the passively cooled one instead of a MacBook Pro 13" M2. Because many people think the actively cooled one will be much better and not overheat, it may increase the amount of money apple makes, especially since the MBA has the new design
The Air is targeted at those that do not need a fan. I am surprised that this basic premise is not understood by consumers? Even on release they interviewed the boss and he stated that the Air is NOT for sustained loads. That is why they kept the MB Pro 13 M2. I mean this is clear and when people do these stupid sustained workloads and slap Apple down, they are just clickbaiting Apple as it is easy money. I get your point of having a fan assisted Air, but the MB Pro 13 M3 is due for a redesign in 2023 so that will be similar to the Air but with fans. Apple slowly releases new models over 2-3 years so that they can market the new design. Doing them at the same time is poor business.
Hi guys, I purchased the m1 pro a year ago with 1tb 16gb ram and yesterday upgraded to m2 max with 1tb and 32gb ram hoping it would make my editing on premiere pro better. The conclusion: I'd avoid the upgrade. I feel my m1 pro did a similar job, I was hoping it would make scrubbing on the timeline better but didn't do much. really dissapointed in Apple.
It is obviously disturbing that Apple would cheap out to this level with their mountains of money. But, for those of us who use a laptop with a SATA SSD, the speeds on the M2 MacBooks would be a significant increase! My laptop's SSD can only do 550MB/s read and write and I don't feel as if it is slow
My solution is skip the M2 Air or Pro. I thought I was going to upgrade my current Intel MacBook Pro this year but now I’ll wait to see what Apple dies next. I don’t want a larger SSD as my main storage is my network Synology NAS. I’m happy to wait it out. I keep my Macs a long time so I have always waited until I’m happy with a new model. I’m patient.
Apple felt that it made the M1 version too good to upgrade noticeably. By bringing down the basic version in the M2, they can justify charging consumers a higher premium for the upgrades and entice you as well for the same to begin with. Besides, there is much for the retail computer world to improve aside from the future of artificial intelligence (AI).
@@Teluric2 Hi-Tech has plateau anyway. There isn't much new to offer that we really need to buy. I mean, how fast do we need these gadgets out there to be? It is like car industry. Anyone that can afford luxury on and in them has it. Now we want cars to drives everywhere without a driver.
I do not understand why you so gentle with this. Why should you care what Apple thinks/feels? Apple sold you an inferior product for the price of the superior one that you were reasonably expecting.
At least Apple could've been transparent and disclosed this to the customer during base model purchase. But they chose not to, because they thought they can get away with it. (Like, they realized later on that they made some M1 silicon specs slightly overpowered.) Apple has this absolutely smug attitude for years (and they only stopped doing so when they got caught. Remember the "butterfly keyboard" disaster, the melting MacBook Airs of Intel past, or the iPhone "batterygate"?) and they'll continue to do so for years. This same attitude of non-disclosure and overcharging (yes they overcharge for SSD and memory for nearly a decade) will continue, as they see themselves as a luxury brand. Going back to the SSD cheapening, because majority of their market (yes even the "pros") won't notice the slowdown (until they use swap memory or transferring gigabytes of files or doing video/3D export.) Some of them won't even care about Cinebench or Geekbench scores either.
Apple is not doing this to force upgrades. If they were, they’d have communicated that the drive was slower. Most people will have no idea that the base models are slower or why that’s the case, and most people won’t see videos like this until after the fact. It’s just supply chain stuff, much like the yields on the M2 chips.
Is it really about noticeable performance? Or about adding insult to injury, on making new generation computers worse and more expensive every single time?
Apple slowing the ssd speed on the m1 or m2 air is absolutely fair and understandable but on a damn pro MacBook not acceptable regardless of the SSD size you choose
Their prices for upgrades is a clear robbery in daylight… No upgradeability after purchase is also just in order to sell more units…. Use once computers and electronics. But saw reviews on yt say, it is more important to have enough ram versus having fast(er) SSD speeds as that won’t be as critical as more RAM…
@@andyH_England My workflow doesn't involve a lot of photo or editing work (though that is something that I would like to get into in the future as a hobby). I usually just have a lot of internet tabs open with a couple of applications (like Word) open as well. My only concern is with this slower SSD speed everyone is talking about. The 1TB upgrade should resolve that, right?
I purchased 16.2 SL / 12C CPU/38C CPU / 64GB / 1TB/KB for college, where I have to use 2 monitors to do statistics and soon coding assignments. I used all the money I had and maxed out my credit card to buy what I thought was the best laptop in the known US world market; I felt it was worth the investment. So frustrating how sluggish it runs. I actually have to shut down the Mac to reboot it. I found your video, as I was seeking to find a way to defrag my new Mac. My husband bought a used Dell desktop refurbished computer, with a rebuilt 2011 processor core; and it runs faster and better when he has numerous programs open all at once, than this Mac M2. Apple proudly advertised you could have all manner of programs and websites open at once, per my experience, this had not proved true. I feel like Apple used the old bait and switch in advertising. I am so disappointed and frustrated. It doesn't make sense to advertise one thing and provide a less them stellar quality product to increase your sales temporarily; Wake-Up Apple, you are ruining your own outstanding reputation! It's like in the planet of the apes "man will make a desert of his home and yours." So Apple, you've ruin the quality of your own products and screw your own customer demographic, by cutting back on quality and lying to the consumer demographic who made you rich ~ I used to feel like no other computer can compare to an Apple, now not so much. How are you going to earn the trust of Apple fans again? The quality of your product has gone downhill! I invested all I had in a now inferior product. The touch pad makes a clicking sound, that you can't turn off. I wish I'd purchased a M1. The M2 MacBook Pro processor speed has been very disappointing.
3:56 Hi thank you for covering this topic, exactly what I’m looking for! Quick question, how big is the improvement when you upgrade the SSD (M2 model) from 256GB to 512GB?
Does anyone have stats on upgrading up to perhaps the 2TB SSD in either the Mac Mini or M2 MacBook Pros? Just would not be happy if those kind of upgrades 9price wise) showed a slowdown because of using a single chip?
@@CreatedTech I just checked via the apple store app on IOS devices and the browser version for US east coast. I only see a floor / base option of the default, 1TB as the original option. I see nothing else to go lower too and now I feel paranoid that the SSD I got by default base option is dealing with performance issues like you’re saying.
Select the base model M1/M2 Pro. Then upgrade the SoC to the M1/M2 Max. You can configure it to have the Max chip and with only 512GB of storage. You're looking at the default M1/M2 Max option which starts at 1TB, but it is possible to configure with lower.
@@CreatedTech Ah that makes sense. I wonder if the 1TB base option is the same as the upgraded 1TB for other MBPs. It seems there is a pattern in base level SSDs having issues. Thanks for replying.
I know how Apple can rationalize this but I still can't get over how they ignore, in production, how stuff like this will go viral. Sure, it may not impact all their users but it impacts enough of us to internalize mistrust of Apple. Very, very bad PR. Hate this about Apple!
Apple's first m1 only shipped with 8GB of RAM so fast SSD was much more important since its used the SSD as RAM (swap) in most cases. This was impressive for the showcase but didn't give people much reason to upgrade just for CPU tasks. Slower SSD + small RAM makes the whole system slower which makes the upgraded ones feel that much better.
I don't think this is exactly the case. Search for 8 vs 16 on M1 and at least 5 videos pop up on YT produced at the time when the M1 debuted (November 2020) debating the wisdom of 8 vs 16. Would those vids exist if there were no 16 GB available back then? It doesn't seem likely. It also doesn't seem likely that Apple would restrict themselves to just 8 GB since the upgrade to 16 means another 200 clams for them out of our wallets. They want it all. Offering 16 was a no-brainer for them. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacBook_Air_(Apple_silicon) This indicates that the product first shipped on November 17, and that 16 GB was an offered upgrade at time of purchase. Case closed. I actually debated this choice myself at the time (I bought one on day one).
Set up your own company if you think you can do better. Apple makes decisions based on survival and to make money for shareholders which is, by law, their prime objective. I suspect they spend millions on research to decide their business model and although you fail to agree or understand, there is very good reasons why they do what they do, though they are not infallible.
@@andyH_England "set up your own company if you think you can do better?" Where did that come from? I'm sorry you felt the need to actually find the time to reply to my comment/ view. Thanks, really! Thanks for the feedback.
@@nicholasmushi6311 Ignore this Rudolf guy, every single one of his comments are either negative or trying to insult someone. It's quite sad really, he needs a hug.
Glad i ordered the 1TB M2 Pro. Blackmagic results: 2TB file = 6455.7 read, and 4942.4 write.. It's crazy fast, way faster than ordinary users would ever need to be honest.
Bro your videos are improving. Raise your front camera little high it looks like you’re looking down plus include more medium and close shots from main front camera not only wide shots. When using 2nd camera or B roll be consistent looking at main camera. Also add smooth zoom when making a point about something specific. I see you use teleprompter but it looks natural the way you speak! Sorry couldn’t resist myself writing this comment!
I still think part of the reason is heat. We know the processors are on basically the same nm process but clocked higher. Nothing has changed on the chassis. Each chip generates additional heat, by using less they are reducing the heat in closed system. Great video, nice explanations! I feel I can always recommend your channel to anyone and they will come away with knowledge rather than being confused.
So for the base m2 mac mini, would upgrading to 16gb ram solve the slow ssd speed during photo/video editing. But not make much of a difference when transferring files.
Wait... I'm a video editor thinking of moving over to Mac but - i heard if the ssd fails - the Macbook Pro is toast because you can't get it swapped out. Is this true? So how do you avoid decaying the internal ssd... I assume you would invest in a external ssd and using TB to edit off that?
Talking about the SSD. I am transitioning from a imac 2015 4 tb ssd to a mac studio m2. Is it recommendable to go for a 1 tb and store my projects or maybe part (music/movies) or even the whole home folder on an external SSD? Thanks for any advice or link!
Get as big a SSD as you can afford. 1TB is usually a good minimum for a desktop but try to stretch to 2TB if you can. Makes it easier to store large apps and essential files and not worry about not enough SSD space.
My Mac mini M2 with 512GB & just 8GB RAM onboard is 2605,6 Write2837, Seems like some inaccurate numbers here, or the updates the Ventura have fixed this issue.
I've got an M1 MAX pro (16 inch) almost fully loaded, but also, and I'm using it right now, an M2 with 16 gigs and 256GB. What I use it for, and that's not just web browsing and doing my taxes, it's a damn fine laptop. I've not had any trouble so far, yes I can notice the drive isn't that fast but I'm not too worried about it.
I was thinking that I’ll buy the Air M1 (for coding purpose) but recently it was discontinued from apple website…then just have the option with Air M2, but the problem is it’s slow SSD. Firstly is the SSD really that much slow…will effect me? Then should I update the SSD or RAM (to 16GB)?
Maybe they are phasing out those 256 storage options (and 512 for pro line up which I assume use different chips). They dont want to buy more of the 128 resp 256 chips they wont have use for in the future. Cool edit btw :D
The reason? The final product is so perfect in that way apple don't have competitors on this market. The cheapest M1 Pro it's too cheap for real value, and the most expensive it's actually the real value. I paid 2k Euro for M1 Pro, 10 Core CPU, 16GB ram, 1TB storage, and I come from an 5k Euro (min) custom build PC (windows). Both computers are really fast, BUT, what Mac delivery it's just amazing.. the OS, trackpad, display, ecosistem, efficiency, power management, battery life, speakers, DESIGN, applications, portability, instant on from standby.. and so many things... I have no words to explain... I feel like I lived into a lie until I found this beauty. Take for example just this minor shortcut "command + q"vs "alt+f4" (for quit applications) It's really easy to press command + q than alt+f4. and this is just a poor example. Aparently not so important... but apple knows everything it's important!
1TB on the M2 pro only has the same SSD speed as 512GB on M1 pro? Why? As you said, upgrading to 1TB on the M2 means two 512GB chips, so twice the reading speed.
Buy according to the need. If you're racing a track, buy a race car. If you're getting groceries, buy a grocery getter. Same with computers. Problem becomes when people taking grocery getter to the race track and complain about not keeping up with other race cars.
I understand your point, but for me, it's the principle. It's like Apple put their loyal customers in a bind to choose and not make a mistake. I haven't touched a windows machine since Windows 95., so I have been in the ecosystem for a long time. So it's trying to find that price/value/speed ratio and not feel so yucky for paying $3000 for a laptop. As we say in the video business, "Buy the best and cry once"...lol
@@xxphactor brand loyalty is understandable, and companies should reward the loyal patrons, otherwise you’re giving loyalty out for free. Apple is top tier device maker demanding premium price, idea is best software on best hardware, and I agree with you that putting low performing ssd to force expensive upgrades is a form of gauging. My must have is 14” screen, and would prefer to get fan-less internals, less gpu cores and max battery, but they don’t want to make mbpro 14 - air. This strategy making me look for alternatives, such as Lenovo idea pad running windows 11 which btw is very, very good. If I was a content creator, I would go for top gear and accept the cost of gear it requires, but for devops work that I do, graphic needs are low, but ram and screen real estate in portable package is a must.
Hmm, the new macbook air 15” m2 I just purchased has double the speeds. I opened the back and it does indeed have 2 nands. This is the 512gb version, so it looks like they are now shipping with dual nand
@@100100freak yeah the air has 2 nand chips for 512gb but the new pro has 1 nand for the 512gb. Wondering if that could make its way to the air as well
You will get longer use out of your Mac with more memory and larger, multi-NAND storage. I suggest this strategy for long-time Apple product owners: when Apple forces a decision to a higher price by leaving out features or performance, just delay your device upgrades. Instead of upgrading iPhone or Watch, AirPods, AppleTV, etc. under your usual timeline, delay the replacement, purchase refurbished/used from a 3rd party, or otherwise don't pay Apple until you can't wait any longer. In the case of M2 512GB MBP upgrades for memory and drive capacity, it will take some time for you to personally see the advantage of the strategy. But you will get the specs you likely need in an expensive primary device, and still have reasonably operable secondary devices. And yes, slower SSD, single NAND performance impacts many operations, including swap which makes an already poor situation (low memory) worse. That inevitably comes into play as your computer ages, software becomes more memory-intensive (it usually does), and you wait to upgrade your Mac.
The best video on this topic. Was searching from last 3 days and now i have the answer what i wanted. Will go for M2 Air 16GB variant. Thankyou for this amazing video.
I don't think it's important if you're going to notice it or not, or if you're just browsing the web is not going to affect you and probably not, but it's a brand new machine and quite expensive and it's slower than it's predecesor, that doesn't seem to be an upgrade. You're paying for something worse, I have a MacBook Pro 14 and honestly was thinking on upgrade in a couple of years, but after seeing how Apple is just making is computers worst in purpose, I'll just keep it for as long as I can and I'll be going back to windows.
It is faster if you buy the correct spec for what you do. If you constantly run into swap, then you have too little RAM. Swap is a bonus; you should rely on it. Even the M1 base model using swap is much slower than an M1 with 16GB of RAM. Ergo, buy extra RAM.
It should not be happening on a 2000$ pro level machine. Sure on a 899$ Macbook Air it is understandable, but not on a machine that is meant for professionals. And the difference between using one NAND or two NAND chips is approx. 1,5$ for Apple. All this makes the 14" M1Pro at 1599$ even better bargin.
The industry is moving away from 128GB NAND modules due to the base models now starting at 256GB. Obviously, two modules cost more than one and more e-waste. So 512GB is now 2X256GB rather than 4X128GB which is no longer being made in volume.
If you already bought your M2 macbook a2338 and you need more storage but youre stuck. You can come to me if you are in Pittsburgh and I can solder another 256 GB chip on to that empty bay. I have a few m2 donor boards. I charge $100 for the labor and $60 for the chip. However, the SSDs for the M2 a2338 are hard to come by. I have never bought an M1 a2338 and used that SSD, so I am not sure they are the same and compatible. It's too expensive to explore and try it out.
Needing an external drive with a mbp > $3K is a dealbreaker. The whole point is portability. They obv have supply chain and production issues but are too lame to be honest about it.
There is nothing "disgusting" about it. Just a business model. Consumers are not forced to buy a Mac and if you do not like it, stop whining and buy something else!
@@andyH_England decreasing the capability without saying anything about it is IN MY HONEST OPINION pretty disgusting. Its not just apple but they are leading the market in being disgusting with how they manage their pricing models etc. Doesnt change the fact that I like their products. But I still can be upset at how morally questionable they treat their customers
You can single out big companies, but they're doing what they're supposed to do. You may unknowingly benefit fron this if you participate in some investment device like a pension fund. The complaining is unpleasant to hear when so many on this earth lack even food and water. Please shut up.
Ive been waiting since 2015 for a decent MacBook to replace 2015 mbp retina. Id hate to buy the m2 mbp only to find a proper upgrade m3 becomes avail next mth. Who doesn’t multi-task?! Who doesnt want faster speeds on every task?! If all you wanted to do was surf the net and read email you wouldnt even be looking at a mbp!
Is it possible that 2 NAND chips in the faster (than M1) base trim M2 MacBook Pros caused a trade off in the way of hotter thermals and performance throttling too frequently?-and that possibly the solution was to change it to a single NAND chip for a slower traffic yet better overall user experience pertaining to battery performance, thermals, and noise ? i.e. slower swap performance but quieter and cooler, since most entry level MacBook Pro users might prefer quieter and cooler laptops for 95% of what they do over the extra performance they'd rarely benefit from here and there?
I am hesitating between a Macbook air M1 256/16 and a M2 256/16. The price difference in my country is 84€. But I would use it for video editing and I don't really understand if the M1 would be much better because of its SSD speed, or not. For now, I think I'd go for the M2 to have updated design and magsafe... hoping that I won't make a mistake. If someone can give me its opinion that would be much appreciated. Thanks a lot.
I see it as clever marketing. For the buyers who won't notice or don't care Apple saves a few bucks on the nand chips. For those who do care and don't want slower SSD's than the older models they will upgrade and Apple profits greatly. And they don't have to say anything to profit from this as the Tech creators do their work for them by letting us know about the issue. Apple wins. One question I have is that if upgrading to 512GB on the M2 MBA solves the problem then why do the 512GB base models on the M2 MBP have the slower SSD's?
The 512GB SSD on the MB Air is the same speed as the MB Pro 14 512GB SSD, so I am not sure what the issue is. Apple just resetting the speeds of each SSD as they move from 128GB modules that are being phased out.
This is product segmentation by price. No matter which configuration you buy, even the very lowest, you're still getting a luxury computer. Macs are objectively better all-around computers than their competition. There is no PC that runs MacOS. That experience is what you cannot get elsewhere.
@@dannyize False..the computers that are used to create ships design drugs are not macs. Luxury is not in the same bag with cheap hardware like apple. A mac with 256GB ssd is a toy for fanboy on denial. You need to grow to know that most of the most powerful software are not made for mac because it lacks power. Try running ansys for 4 weeks nonstop on mac and you ll have firefighters at your door. Engineers dont need fancy toys to pretend they have fake status they use tools. Leave fancy macs for old teenagers that never grew.
False. Both the 512 M2 mini and 512 M2 Pro mini are as fast or faster than any M1 mini ever was, at over 3000 MB/s. The 1TB and higher M2 Pro mini (not M2 regular) can even achieve over 6000, speeds which were never before possible in a mini as they did not have access to the M1 Pro architecture. The M2 and M2 pro minis are different architectures but both have a 512GB option. Sounds like you might be getting confused by that.
@@LukezyM What kind of assumption is that, we don't know what his parents are going to be using it for, maybe they do 3d modeling or video editing, who knows ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Great content as always! Am thinking of buying the Book3 Ultra i7 model. After few deals and discounts applied, its costs me $1350 (Pre tax). Any suggestion if i can get this or any other windows alternative? Any response would be appreciated!
Despite the usual Apple trolls making a nuisance in the comment section, there is a reasonable understanding that this is unimportant to the vast majority. There are many reasons why this is overblown. The main reason is that the gripe was with the sequential read and writes, and for most of us using a base MB Air, we will be limited by the external device's speed, and 1.6Gbps will be more than enough for our phone, cameras and SD cards! What is vastly more critical are the random reads and writes, as they are what swap uses. They are some of the best and better than the M1. An example of iniquity is that the new Galaxy Book3 Pro has half the random read and writes of the base M2 MB Air! Yet no one is testing that out to see how poorly it will perform versus the M2 Air! Interestingly, Max Tech did a video where he compared M2 MB Air versus the new Galaxy Book3 Pro. Even though the 512GB SSD in the Samsung benched twice as fast in sequential speeds, it was slower transferring files due to the smaller cache in the SSD! Without perspective and instead just spec-chasing for higher numbers, not understanding the intricacies of optimisation, hardware quality and software means people are left with a false fake impression that does not resemble reality.
Leave a comment on this video with your opinion. Is this just Apple being greedy? Do they have any legitimate excuses for doing this? Will you even notice the difference?
HONESTLY? The slowdown on SSD upon choosing the base models should've been disclosed upon purchase (like, leaving a footnote upon checkout.)
Apple should've at least be transparent and state these changes on the customers. But out of all things, I do not expect transparency on an arrogant Apple. Heck, they even STOPPED disclosing read/write speeds on their storage anymore that's outside of their Mac Pro. lineup.
The chip shortage may probably have played a role into this, but on the case of SSDs it's much more affordable now than recent (and I'm not even mentioning that exorbitant Apple Tax they incur on those options.)
The larger reason? Lower manufacturing costs and raising prices to gain more profit margins. Basically the same tactic, and the reason why iPhones began to be more and more and more expensive despite the manufacturing costs quoted as lower than previous iterations.
TL;DR: Profit. Because Apple can.
And no matter how much we complain about their prices (and Apple cheapening out on features) at the end of the day, people will still buy it for that brand name alone.
Bro your videos are improving. Raise your front camera little high it looks like you’re looking down plus include more medium and close shots from main front camera not only wide shots. When using 2nd camera or B roll be consistent looking at main camera. Also add smooth zoom when making a point about something specific. I see you use teleprompter but it looks natural the way you speak!
Sorry couldn’t resist myself writing this comment!
What 14 inch m1 MacBook Pro do you think is the sweet spot at the moment. I’m trying to pick up an M1 on sale instead of a new M2zzzz
The slow SSDs in the M2 Macs were disappointing, but the slow SSDs in the M2 Pro/Max Macs are straight up insulting! These are "PRO" machines, Apple has no excuse for saving two bucks on the SSD!
You gotta understand apple is not ferrari and must cut BOM to save money to please shareholders.
Ferrari can use the best tech and materials because their customers can pay.
@@Teluric2 Do you mean Apple computers are too cheap ?
Base M2 pro is 10-core Cpu and its performance is slightly better than M1 pro 10-core which it cost was 200$ more.
Watch the comparison video test by Luke Miani who explains it well
Can I use About This Mac to determine how many SSD modules exist without physically opening the Mac?
As far as I know Apple has not acknowledged this new configuration and/or the slower read/write speed while commanding the same price of 200$ for 256 GB which is about 4-5 times higher than the market price for this size of SSD. Moreover, once you bought it you would have to live with it since Apple does not allow for any change in the configuration. I think that this is why Apple did it. It is win-win for Apple: If you do not like your configuration you would have to sell and buy again with more RAM and/or a bigger SSD. It is very sad that one of the most valuable companies in the world behaves as a cheep store where you have to ask 100 times to be sure that you are paying for the product you were told you were getting. Another point is that Apple and others would continue behaving like that if they are not told that this is unacceptable, i.e., it does not matter if one would or would not notice the difference because of that he/she received/paid not the same product that was advertised.
The SSD speeds wouldn't be an issue at all really if the cost to upgrade wasn't so high. It's £200 just for a measly extra 512gb and if its extra RAM you want, apple are charging £400 to double your 16Gb to 32... Madness.
not madness...Apple business model lol
@@JeGo9 yeah I agree, a shame though that every new Mac purchase comes with compromises (for me at least), rather than be ripped off by Apple’s exorbitant upgrade prices.
The answer is easy don t buy the m2 chip most people won t see the difference anyway and you save money.
The bigger issue than just the read/write speeds is that since the nand chips are soldered, having less of them decreases the lifespan of the chip and ur computer as a whole. Its not only increasing profit margins, but will force customers to upgrade their computers sooner, cus once the ssd goes up, ur whole computer is shot. Even if you can find a tech who is willing to do the solder job, theres no way to purchase a brand new nand chip for the macs specific bga, so youd have to use a refurbished nand chip. This whole situation is really ugly and disappointing.
Larger NAND chips have longer lifespans though. One 256GB SSD has a longer lifespan than two 128GB SSDs, despite the former being the slower configuration. This shouldn't really be a concern however, as you're more likely to replace one of these computers years before their SSDs would fail.
@@TomlinsonHolman52583 Thats not true SLC chips have longer life and thats because they re more expensive but apple use the cheaper. TLC chips.
SLC Chips are used in very high end ssd like memblaze.
You dont know how many M1 macs are dead because faulty SSD. Secondary storage ssd can last more but not system ssd
@@TomlinsonHolman52583 It depends, how many years until the SSD fails?
Got the MBA m2 with 16gb of ram after knowing abt the slow SSD. So far Ive only seen macOS use swap once. I always leave abt a dozen apps opened including 2 browsers with multiple tabs on each and overall performance has been smooth. So between the ram and the SSD upgrade, I'd recommend the ram.
Well said. Many YT "experts" have been saying to update 256GB to 512GB, but they are missing the point; the lack of RAM slows the system, not the SSD. We can always use an external SSD if you need more storage, but RAM is not upgradeable.
Exactly! I went from Intel 2020 MacBook Air and went straight to the M2 MacBook Air 15 inch with 24GB Ram and 256 SSD storage and its a definite powerhouse! Especially with the educational discount!
I was thinking that I’ll buy the Air M1 (for coding purpose) but recently it was discontinued from apple website…then just have the option with Air M2, but the problem is it’s slow SSD. Firstly is the SSD really that much slow…will effect me? Then should I update the SSD or RAM (to 16GB)?
@@codewithsoham Definitely get the 16gb option. The SSD is not slow enough to be noticeable. It is only a problem when you, for example, export a long video in premiere pro or when you transfer gigabytes of data from the internal SSD to another drive. If you need more storage, it is way cheaper to get an external thunderbolt SSD enclosure and a gen 3 SSD than upgrading the internal SSD.
Your videos are better and better
I've got the base model M2 MacBook Air, and I knew going in that about the SSD speed issue. Since the MBA is my travel device and I have a Mac desktop for the heavy lifting it hasn't been an issue for me (i.e., no swap filing so far).
two reasons - one, to bring the base model in at a lower price point, given than most people going for this base model aren't likely to be audio or video pros - and for whom the base price is key - second (smaller reason) , last year there was still a shortage of ssd chips - so putting in a single chip rather than 2 helped Apple guarantee they could bring the new M2 to market on time and in sufficient quantities.
Normally I wouldn’t care about a slower SSD, however, for Apple silicon systems it DOES matter how fast your internal storage is because of swap memory, like mentioned already on the video, especially considering modern applications simply requiere more RAM and RAM is at a premium in this situation, both because it costs an unreasonable amount of money to upgrade from a base model, but also because this is SHARED memory with the GPU, which means the OS has even LESS memory available as it has to share it.
Anyway, I guess we can only dream of Apple being cheap and giving their “Pro” models more pro specs next time.
In benchmarks your theory didn’t play out. Look at MaxTech channel comparing base model 14” M1 Pro vs M2 pro. The base model M2 pro with slower SSD was faster in every single test but one. Also the “slower” SSD is faster for small random reads and writes. This UA-camr only discussed sequential burst speeds, which is actually less important for most common tasks.
@@spacecadet2172 Really???? Maxtech is just using benchmarks and flaky testing to please his chiefe tim cook.
Since when maxtech is serious?
@@Teluric2 What are you talking about? MaxTech has been incredibly critical of Apple about this issue and fueling and exploiting the outrage for clicks/views at every chance they get. Clearly you haven’t even watched their videos about the topic. In any event, here is what their tests found:
-Disk Speed Sequential test: New base models slower
-Disk Speed Random test: New base models faster
-Geekbench: New base models 20% faster
-Web browsing: New base models 14% faster
-Figma web design: New base models 20% faster
-Cinebench: New base models 23% faster
-3dmark: New base models 22% faster
-GFXBench 1440p: New base models 25% faster
-GFXBench 4K: New base models 24% faster
-Blender: New base models 45% faster
-Lightroom: New base models faster - “Even though the SSDs are slower, it was 3 seconds faster”
-4K HEVC Encoding: No difference - “Slower” SSD did not have any performance impact
-4K ProRes Raw: New base models faster - “What if we make it harder”. “It looks like the M2 Pro is still faster”
So clearly it has very little impact for most tasks, as in most tasks over 3000 MB/s is more than enough speed, and not the limiting factor to performance (CPU, GPU, RAM or otherwise is)
Hey there, just to be sure....
A M2 Max 32 Ram 500 SSD has this problem, but the 1 Tb SSD would come with the extra NAND, correct?
Certainly RAM should be upgraded, but doesn’t adding an external SSD with faster than onboard read/write speeds resolve this situation? Great video, as always!
If you get a Thunderbolt enclosure, most portable running USB C are going to be slower than even the 256GB.
Apple should (imo) have released an actively cooled MacBook Air M2 alongside the passively cooled one instead of a MacBook Pro 13" M2. Because many people think the actively cooled one will be much better and not overheat, it may increase the amount of money apple makes, especially since the MBA has the new design
I think Apple want to differentiate the Air from the Pro via the ports and active cooling, otherwise the price would go up.
The Air is targeted at those that do not need a fan. I am surprised that this basic premise is not understood by consumers? Even on release they interviewed the boss and he stated that the Air is NOT for sustained loads. That is why they kept the MB Pro 13 M2. I mean this is clear and when people do these stupid sustained workloads and slap Apple down, they are just clickbaiting Apple as it is easy money. I get your point of having a fan assisted Air, but the MB Pro 13 M3 is due for a redesign in 2023 so that will be similar to the Air but with fans. Apple slowly releases new models over 2-3 years so that they can market the new design. Doing them at the same time is poor business.
It has no reason for cooling. It does not even get warm. I use mine for music production and not one single problem at all.
Hi guys, I purchased the m1 pro a year ago with 1tb 16gb ram and yesterday upgraded to m2 max with 1tb and 32gb ram hoping it would make my editing on premiere pro better. The conclusion: I'd avoid the upgrade. I feel my m1 pro did a similar job, I was hoping it would make scrubbing on the timeline better but didn't do much. really dissapointed in Apple.
what should I get instead
It is obviously disturbing that Apple would cheap out to this level with their mountains of money.
But, for those of us who use a laptop with a SATA SSD, the speeds on the M2 MacBooks would be a significant increase! My laptop's SSD can only do 550MB/s read and write and I don't feel as if it is slow
A Seagate FireCUDA 530 can match those Mac Silicon SSD speeds and, a bonus: the NVMe SSDs are removable.
My thoughts exactly, it is slower... but just in comparison, for everyday use it is enough.
My solution is skip the M2 Air or Pro. I thought I was going to upgrade my current Intel MacBook Pro this year but now I’ll wait to see what Apple dies next. I don’t want a larger SSD as my main storage is my network Synology NAS. I’m happy to wait it out. I keep my Macs a long time so I have always waited until I’m happy with a new model. I’m patient.
Recently I bought MacBook M2 Pro 14 inch 16GB ram, 512 SSD
No impact on SSD reads & writes?
Need to buy new laptop. Which one between M1 Macbook Pro 14” and M2 Macbook Pro 14”? And why?
Apple felt that it made the M1 version too good to upgrade noticeably. By bringing down the basic version in the M2, they can justify charging consumers a higher premium for the upgrades and entice you as well for the same to begin with. Besides, there is much for the retail computer world to improve aside from the future of artificial intelligence (AI).
Apple felt? You cant say that ,tim cook is not your buddy. Its just what you want us to think so people cant say apple is cheating.
@@Teluric2 Hi-Tech has plateau anyway. There isn't much new to offer that we really need to buy. I mean, how fast do we need these gadgets out there to be? It is like car industry. Anyone that can afford luxury on and in them has it. Now we want cars to drives everywhere without a driver.
I do not understand why you so gentle with this. Why should you care what Apple thinks/feels? Apple sold you an inferior product for the price of the superior one that you were reasonably expecting.
@@borisf2520 I did not buy the a Mac with the M2 chip.
At least Apple could've been transparent and disclosed this to the customer during base model purchase.
But they chose not to, because they thought they can get away with it. (Like, they realized later on that they made some M1 silicon specs slightly overpowered.) Apple has this absolutely smug attitude for years (and they only stopped doing so when they got caught. Remember the "butterfly keyboard" disaster, the melting MacBook Airs of Intel past, or the iPhone "batterygate"?) and they'll continue to do so for years. This same attitude of non-disclosure and overcharging (yes they overcharge for SSD and memory for nearly a decade) will continue, as they see themselves as a luxury brand.
Going back to the SSD cheapening, because majority of their market (yes even the "pros") won't notice the slowdown (until they use swap memory or transferring gigabytes of files or doing video/3D export.) Some of them won't even care about Cinebench or Geekbench scores either.
Apple is not doing this to force upgrades. If they were, they’d have communicated that the drive was slower. Most people will have no idea that the base models are slower or why that’s the case, and most people won’t see videos like this until after the fact. It’s just supply chain stuff, much like the yields on the M2 chips.
What about the Pro?. Is the base 512 slower too? Should we upgrade Pro to 1T?
Great video and seeing empty slots on the logic board is the level of detail needed!
The production gets better with every video.
Is there anyone notice the LanaRhoades.mp4 on the Highway 😂
😂
Wait what? Loll gonna rewatch it lol so crazy
1:52
😂😂😂😂
Is it really about noticeable performance? Or about adding insult to injury, on making new generation computers worse and more expensive every single time?
Apple slowing the ssd speed on the m1 or m2 air is absolutely fair and understandable but on a damn pro MacBook not acceptable regardless of the SSD size you choose
Maybe apple knows base 8/256 configuration is not enough and wants to make it easier to upgrade them. Ofc in their official service :)
Their prices for upgrades is a clear robbery in daylight… No upgradeability after purchase is also just in order to sell more units…. Use once computers and electronics.
But saw reviews on yt say, it is more important to have enough ram versus having fast(er) SSD speeds as that won’t be as critical as more RAM…
Yes, those that advocate a larger SSD rather than more RAM do not understand what is going on and are giving poor advice.
I'd love to know what percentage of customers choose the 256 storage and 24GB RAM. That's an interesting niche.
@@andyH_England So I should go for the 32gb ram upgrade over the 1tb storage upgrade?
@@phothewin6019 If you can only have one, then yes, if you do a lot of photo or editing work. You can use an external drive for storage.
@@andyH_England My workflow doesn't involve a lot of photo or editing work (though that is something that I would like to get into in the future as a hobby). I usually just have a lot of internet tabs open with a couple of applications (like Word) open as well. My only concern is with this slower SSD speed everyone is talking about. The 1TB upgrade should resolve that, right?
Slightly off topic, but may I ask what docking station you use, and if you recommend it?
I looked through your videos but could not see a review on it
Are you running your m1 macs on Monterey?
I purchased 16.2 SL / 12C CPU/38C CPU / 64GB / 1TB/KB for college, where I have to use 2 monitors to do statistics and soon coding assignments. I used all the money I had and maxed out my credit card to buy what I thought was the best laptop in the known US world market; I felt it was worth the investment. So frustrating how sluggish it runs. I actually have to shut down the Mac to reboot it. I found your video, as I was seeking to find a way to defrag my new Mac. My husband bought a used Dell desktop refurbished computer, with a rebuilt 2011 processor core; and it runs faster and better when he has numerous programs open all at once, than this Mac M2. Apple proudly advertised you could have all manner of programs and websites open at once, per my experience, this had not proved true. I feel like Apple used the old bait and switch in advertising. I am so disappointed and frustrated. It doesn't make sense to advertise one thing and provide a less them stellar quality product to increase your sales temporarily; Wake-Up Apple, you are ruining your own outstanding reputation! It's like in the planet of the apes "man will make a desert of his home and yours." So Apple, you've ruin the quality of your own products and screw your own customer demographic, by cutting back on quality and lying to the consumer demographic who made you rich ~ I used to feel like no other computer can compare to an Apple, now not so much. How are you going to earn the trust of Apple fans again? The quality of your product has gone downhill! I invested all I had in a now inferior product. The touch pad makes a clicking sound, that you can't turn off. I wish I'd purchased a M1. The M2 MacBook Pro processor speed has been very disappointing.
3:56 Hi thank you for covering this topic, exactly what I’m looking for! Quick question, how big is the improvement when you upgrade the SSD (M2 model) from 256GB to 512GB?
Your chart at 4:35 says macbook air not pro in small writing on top left hand corner.
It makes no difference, they all use the same M2 chip.
Is this still the case in with the M3 pro/ultra?
Does anyone have stats on upgrading up to perhaps the 2TB SSD in either the Mac Mini or M2 MacBook Pros? Just would not be happy if those kind of upgrades 9price wise) showed a slowdown because of using a single chip?
What do you mean by a 512GB version for the M2 Max? I just ordered one and the only floor version they had was a 1TB.
You can configure a 512GB M1/M2 Max.
@@CreatedTech I just checked via the apple store app on IOS devices and the browser version for US east coast. I only see a floor / base option of the default, 1TB as the original option.
I see nothing else to go lower too and now I feel paranoid that the SSD I got by default base option is dealing with performance issues like you’re saying.
Select the base model M1/M2 Pro. Then upgrade the SoC to the M1/M2 Max. You can configure it to have the Max chip and with only 512GB of storage. You're looking at the default M1/M2 Max option which starts at 1TB, but it is possible to configure with lower.
@@CreatedTech Ah that makes sense. I wonder if the 1TB base option is the same as the upgraded 1TB for other MBPs.
It seems there is a pattern in base level SSDs having issues.
Thanks for replying.
@@kodekorp2064 You shouldn't have any issues with the 1TB SSD. It should be using 4 x 256GB NAND chips which will give you very good performance.
This is despicable from apple. They charge top dollar and should do and use the best
I actually returned my m1 MacBook Pro for the m2 MacBook Pro w/ 1tb and i can tell the difference in everyday tasks even if its a little..
I have an mac air M2 and it has 2 Nand chips. Is this maybe just for the US? I'm in Canada.
would you want to upgrade or would you suggest that everyone needs to upgrade?
what about M2 Pro Mac Mini? Base model M2 Pro Mac Mini is 512 GB
what is the solution after purchase to get better speed
Great video as always! My question is what prevents us to solder another same NAND chip once it’s out of warranty?
Nothing! Obviously it will void your warranty, and it’s a very difficult process requiring specific knowledge and tools, but I’ve seen it done before.
It won't be recognized by the system
@@AzVfLI’m sure someone will figure out changes needed (a resister here and there) so the extra chip can be recognized.
@@JMai-ci9nl I just saw on reddit that you can solder some extra NAND chips on M1 & M2, not M1 Pro/Max, and it will be recognized
I know how Apple can rationalize this but I still can't get over how they ignore, in production, how stuff like this will go viral. Sure, it may not impact all their users but it impacts enough of us to internalize mistrust of Apple. Very, very bad PR. Hate this about Apple!
will running macOS from external drive can resolve memory swap issue?
So does the 1tb ssd option have a single ssd or 2 512’s?
Apple's first m1 only shipped with 8GB of RAM so fast SSD was much more important since its used the SSD as RAM (swap) in most cases. This was impressive for the showcase but didn't give people much reason to upgrade just for CPU tasks. Slower SSD + small RAM makes the whole system slower which makes the upgraded ones feel that much better.
I don't think this is exactly the case. Search for 8 vs 16 on M1 and at least 5 videos pop up on YT produced at the time when the M1 debuted (November 2020) debating the wisdom of 8 vs 16. Would those vids exist if there were no 16 GB available back then? It doesn't seem likely.
It also doesn't seem likely that Apple would restrict themselves to just 8 GB since the upgrade to 16 means another 200 clams for them out of our wallets. They want it all. Offering 16 was a no-brainer for them.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacBook_Air_(Apple_silicon)
This indicates that the product first shipped on November 17, and that 16 GB was an offered upgrade at time of purchase. Case closed.
I actually debated this choice myself at the time (I bought one on day one).
How did no one notice Lana Rhodes file on the highway
here's free content for you, compare the 10 core M1 Pro to 10 core M2 pro, the people need to know
I personally sometimes fail to understand the decisions/ moves Apple makes with some of their products😐.
Set up your own company if you think you can do better. Apple makes decisions based on survival and to make money for shareholders which is, by law, their prime objective. I suspect they spend millions on research to decide their business model and although you fail to agree or understand, there is very good reasons why they do what they do, though they are not infallible.
That's your problem alone. 🤷♂
@@andyH_England "set up your own company if you think you can do better?" Where did that come from? I'm sorry you felt the need to actually find the time to reply to my comment/ view. Thanks, really! Thanks for the feedback.
@@RudolfGottfried okey.
@@nicholasmushi6311 Ignore this Rudolf guy, every single one of his comments are either negative or trying to insult someone. It's quite sad really, he needs a hug.
Glad i ordered the 1TB M2 Pro. Blackmagic results: 2TB file = 6455.7 read, and 4942.4 write.. It's crazy fast, way faster than ordinary users would ever need to be honest.
If I upgrade to 1tb 16 inch m2 pro will it be faster at everything compare to 1tb 16inch m1 pro?
Bro your videos are improving. Raise your front camera little high it looks like you’re looking down plus include more medium and close shots from main front camera not only wide shots. When using 2nd camera or B roll be consistent looking at main camera. Also add smooth zoom when making a point about something specific. I see you use teleprompter but it looks natural the way you speak!
Sorry couldn’t resist myself writing this comment!
I still think part of the reason is heat. We know the processors are on basically the same nm process but clocked higher. Nothing has changed on the chassis. Each chip generates additional heat, by using less they are reducing the heat in closed system. Great video, nice explanations! I feel I can always recommend your channel to anyone and they will come away with knowledge rather than being confused.
So you chat with apple engineers..
So for the base m2 mac mini, would upgrading to 16gb ram solve the slow ssd speed during photo/video editing. But not make much of a difference when transferring files.
Wait... I'm a video editor thinking of moving over to Mac but - i heard if the ssd fails - the Macbook Pro is toast because you can't get it swapped out. Is this true? So how do you avoid decaying the internal ssd... I assume you would invest in a external ssd and using TB to edit off that?
I made a video a year ago that will answer this question for you: ua-cam.com/video/KBQ8XBxtgkk/v-deo.html
I know the 4tb drive is slower than the 1tb and 2 tb drives and the 512 is the slowest but what are the speeds of the different drives?
Talking about the SSD. I am transitioning from a imac 2015 4 tb ssd to a mac studio m2. Is it recommendable to go for a 1 tb and store my projects or maybe part (music/movies) or even the whole home folder on an external SSD? Thanks for any advice or link!
Get as big a SSD as you can afford. 1TB is usually a good minimum for a desktop but try to stretch to 2TB if you can. Makes it easier to store large apps and essential files and not worry about not enough SSD space.
My Mac mini M2 with 512GB & just 8GB RAM onboard is 2605,6 Write2837, Seems like some inaccurate numbers here, or the updates the Ventura have fixed this issue.
I've got an M1 MAX pro (16 inch) almost fully loaded, but also, and I'm using it right now, an M2 with 16 gigs and 256GB. What I use it for, and that's not just web browsing and doing my taxes, it's a damn fine laptop. I've not had any trouble so far, yes I can notice the drive isn't that fast but I'm not too worried about it.
I was thinking that I’ll buy the Air M1 (for coding purpose) but recently it was discontinued from apple website…then just have the option with Air M2, but the problem is it’s slow SSD. Firstly is the SSD really that much slow…will effect me? Then should I update the SSD or RAM (to 16GB)?
Maybe they are phasing out those 256 storage options (and 512 for pro line up which I assume use different chips). They dont want to buy more of the 128 resp 256 chips they wont have use for in the future. Cool edit btw :D
I have the 16 gb ram /1tb12/19 does this count ??
For those who wanna know i did the black magic test on my ssd’s and i get 6200 write and somewhere around 5k read
The reason? The final product is so perfect in that way apple don't have competitors on this market. The cheapest M1 Pro it's too cheap for real value, and the most expensive it's actually the real value. I paid 2k Euro for M1 Pro, 10 Core CPU, 16GB ram, 1TB storage, and I come from an 5k Euro (min) custom build PC (windows). Both computers are really fast, BUT, what Mac delivery it's just amazing.. the OS, trackpad, display, ecosistem, efficiency, power management, battery life, speakers, DESIGN, applications, portability, instant on from standby.. and so many things... I have no words to explain... I feel like I lived into a lie until I found this beauty. Take for example just this minor shortcut "command + q"vs "alt+f4" (for quit applications) It's really easy to press command + q than alt+f4. and this is just a poor example. Aparently not so important... but apple knows everything it's important!
1TB on the M2 pro only has the same SSD speed as 512GB on M1 pro? Why?
As you said, upgrading to 1TB on the M2 means two 512GB chips, so twice the reading speed.
There is a sale on M2 Macbook Pro for 1700 AUD, 1100 USD... but hearing about the SSD problem makes me want to buy another machine.
finally someone says that the 1tb version on the pro models solves the issue!
Only for transfer speeds not every day use.
Shots from the side of your talking to the camera destroy the illusion that you are talking to your audience.
Buy according to the need. If you're racing a track, buy a race car. If you're getting groceries, buy a grocery getter. Same with computers. Problem becomes when people taking grocery getter to the race track and complain about not keeping up with other race cars.
I understand your point, but for me, it's the principle. It's like Apple put their loyal customers in a bind to choose and not make a mistake. I haven't touched a windows machine since Windows 95., so I have been in the ecosystem for a long time. So it's trying to find that price/value/speed ratio and not feel so yucky for paying $3000 for a laptop. As we say in the video business, "Buy the best and cry once"...lol
@@xxphactor brand loyalty is understandable, and companies should reward the loyal patrons, otherwise you’re giving loyalty out for free. Apple is top tier device maker demanding premium price, idea is best software on best hardware, and I agree with you that putting low performing ssd to force expensive upgrades is a form of gauging. My must have is 14” screen, and would prefer to get fan-less internals, less gpu cores and max battery, but they don’t want to make mbpro 14 - air. This strategy making me look for alternatives, such as Lenovo idea pad running windows 11 which btw is very, very good. If I was a content creator, I would go for top gear and accept the cost of gear it requires, but for devops work that I do, graphic needs are low, but ram and screen real estate in portable package is a must.
Hmm, the new macbook air 15” m2 I just purchased has double the speeds. I opened the back and it does indeed have 2 nands. This is the 512gb version, so it looks like they are now shipping with dual nand
Wondering if there could be a silent revision in the m2 air and it gets the single 512gb nand as well at some point
do you mean the m1? the m2 already has a single 512gb chip
No that can’t happen
@@100100freak in the air?
@@Mooooooof I thought so, maybe I'm wrong though
@@100100freak yeah the air has 2 nand chips for 512gb but the new pro has 1 nand for the 512gb. Wondering if that could make its way to the air as well
You will get longer use out of your Mac with more memory and larger, multi-NAND storage. I suggest this strategy for long-time Apple product owners: when Apple forces a decision to a higher price by leaving out features or performance, just delay your device upgrades. Instead of upgrading iPhone or Watch, AirPods, AppleTV, etc. under your usual timeline, delay the replacement, purchase refurbished/used from a 3rd party, or otherwise don't pay Apple until you can't wait any longer. In the case of M2 512GB MBP upgrades for memory and drive capacity, it will take some time for you to personally see the advantage of the strategy. But you will get the specs you likely need in an expensive primary device, and still have reasonably operable secondary devices. And yes, slower SSD, single NAND performance impacts many operations, including swap which makes an already poor situation (low memory) worse. That inevitably comes into play as your computer ages, software becomes more memory-intensive (it usually does), and you wait to upgrade your Mac.
Any solution ?
The best video on this topic.
Was searching from last 3 days and now i have the answer what i wanted.
Will go for M2 Air 16GB variant.
Thankyou for this amazing video.
the best concise short simple video which explains the old RAM vs SSD dilemma.
I just bought m2 16 gb ram 256 storage for 1250 euro is a good deal?
I don't think it's important if you're going to notice it or not, or if you're just browsing the web is not going to affect you and probably not, but it's a brand new machine and quite expensive and it's slower than it's predecesor, that doesn't seem to be an upgrade. You're paying for something worse, I have a MacBook Pro 14 and honestly was thinking on upgrade in a couple of years, but after seeing how Apple is just making is computers worst in purpose, I'll just keep it for as long as I can and I'll be going back to windows.
It is faster if you buy the correct spec for what you do. If you constantly run into swap, then you have too little RAM. Swap is a bonus; you should rely on it. Even the M1 base model using swap is much slower than an M1 with 16GB of RAM. Ergo, buy extra RAM.
It should not be happening on a 2000$ pro level machine. Sure on a 899$ Macbook Air it is understandable, but not on a machine that is meant for professionals. And the difference between using one NAND or two NAND chips is approx. 1,5$ for Apple. All this makes the 14" M1Pro at 1599$ even better bargin.
The base M2 MBA is actually $1200 and €1500 ($1630) in EU
I found that screws holding imac screen are made of zinc that is more cheap that steel screws that are more sturdy.
The industry is moving away from 128GB NAND modules due to the base models now starting at 256GB. Obviously, two modules cost more than one and more e-waste. So 512GB is now 2X256GB rather than 4X128GB which is no longer being made in volume.
If you already bought your M2 macbook a2338 and you need more storage but youre stuck. You can come to me if you are in Pittsburgh and I can solder another 256 GB chip on to that empty bay. I have a few m2 donor boards. I charge $100 for the labor and $60 for the chip. However, the SSDs for the M2 a2338 are hard to come by. I have never bought an M1 a2338 and used that SSD, so I am not sure they are the same and compatible. It's too expensive to explore and try it out.
Needing an external drive with a mbp > $3K is a dealbreaker. The whole point is portability. They obv have supply chain and production issues but are too lame to be honest about it.
improving profit margins at the cost of us users. Disgusting how these big companies work
Especially when we are already paying 1200$ and in India 1500$
yes Tim Cook should be fired
There is nothing "disgusting" about it. Just a business model. Consumers are not forced to buy a Mac and if you do not like it, stop whining and buy something else!
@@andyH_England decreasing the capability without saying anything about it is IN MY HONEST OPINION pretty disgusting. Its not just apple but they are leading the market in being disgusting with how they manage their pricing models etc. Doesnt change the fact that I like their products. But I still can be upset at how morally questionable they treat their customers
You can single out big companies, but they're doing what they're supposed to do. You may unknowingly benefit fron this if you participate in some investment device like a pension fund.
The complaining is unpleasant to hear when so many on this earth lack even food and water. Please shut up.
Maybe they use M2 chips were 1 of the SSD controllers came out faulty from production.
You always produce some chips with faults but some faults maybe don’t matter in some products. They use the chips in iPads and Monitors too…
I hadn't heard of this theory. Apple surely won't be telling us if this is true.
Its more likely that aliens manipulated the ssd that apple can send a faulty unit.
Hey bro love your videos! what lights are you using to have the purple colour in the backround?
Ive been waiting since 2015 for a decent MacBook to replace 2015 mbp retina. Id hate to buy the m2 mbp only to find a proper upgrade m3 becomes avail next mth. Who doesn’t multi-task?! Who doesnt want faster speeds on every task?! If all you wanted to do was surf the net and read email you wouldnt even be looking at a mbp!
Is it possible that 2 NAND chips in the faster (than M1) base trim M2 MacBook Pros caused a trade off in the way of hotter thermals and performance throttling too frequently?-and that possibly the solution was to change it to a single NAND chip for a slower traffic yet better overall user experience pertaining to battery performance, thermals, and noise ? i.e. slower swap performance but quieter and cooler, since most entry level MacBook Pro users might prefer quieter and cooler laptops for 95% of what they do over the extra performance they'd rarely benefit from here and there?
I am hesitating between a Macbook air M1 256/16 and a M2 256/16. The price difference in my country is 84€. But I would use it for video editing and I don't really understand if the M1 would be much better because of its SSD speed, or not. For now, I think I'd go for the M2 to have updated design and magsafe... hoping that I won't make a mistake. If someone can give me its opinion that would be much appreciated. Thanks a lot.
I see it as clever marketing. For the buyers who won't notice or don't care Apple saves a few bucks on the nand chips. For those who do care and don't want slower SSD's than the older models they will upgrade and Apple profits greatly. And they don't have to say anything to profit from this as the Tech creators do their work for them by letting us know about the issue. Apple wins. One question I have is that if upgrading to 512GB on the M2 MBA solves the problem then why do the 512GB base models on the M2 MBP have the slower SSD's?
About your question: MBP has 4 chips, so 2x256 on the m2 is slower than 4x128 on the m1
The 512GB SSD on the MB Air is the same speed as the MB Pro 14 512GB SSD, so I am not sure what the issue is. Apple just resetting the speeds of each SSD as they move from 128GB modules that are being phased out.
This is product segmentation by price. No matter which configuration you buy, even the very lowest, you're still getting a luxury computer.
Macs are objectively better all-around computers than their competition. There is no PC that runs MacOS. That experience is what you cannot get elsewhere.
@@kahveciderin Thanks, that makes sense
@@dannyize False..the computers that are used to create ships design drugs are not macs.
Luxury is not in the same bag with cheap hardware like apple. A mac with 256GB ssd is a toy for fanboy on denial.
You need to grow to know that most of the most powerful software are not made for mac because it lacks power. Try running ansys for 4 weeks nonstop on mac and you ll have firefighters at your door.
Engineers dont need fancy toys to pretend they have fake status they use tools.
Leave fancy macs for old teenagers that never grew.
I was going to get a Mac mini for my parents but sadly even upgrading to 512GB still has lower read/write speeds!
False. Both the 512 M2 mini and 512 M2 Pro mini are as fast or faster than any M1 mini ever was, at over 3000 MB/s. The 1TB and higher M2 Pro mini (not M2 regular) can even achieve over 6000, speeds which were never before possible in a mini as they did not have access to the M1 Pro architecture. The M2 and M2 pro minis are different architectures but both have a 512GB option. Sounds like you might be getting confused by that.
Your parents won’t notice the difference, jeez!!
@@LukezyM What kind of assumption is that, we don't know what his parents are going to be using it for, maybe they do 3d modeling or video editing, who knows ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Great content as always! Am thinking of buying the Book3 Ultra i7 model. After few deals and discounts applied, its costs me $1350 (Pre tax). Any suggestion if i can get this or any other windows alternative? Any response would be appreciated!
What about just getting the M1 macbooks for less money and get better performance? Problem solved.
Has anyone tested the speed for the 2TB, 4TB, and 8TB versions? I thought the 4TB and 8TB were the fastest. Is this still true?
It's like the ram is $100 and $300 for the labor to solder it in....like a stealership!
Thanks for the clear and precise explaination :)
So Apple is pretty much robbing their customers... LMAO
cool file passing on the highway 😂
Crisp explanation, awesome video! Thanks!
Despite the usual Apple trolls making a nuisance in the comment section, there is a reasonable understanding that this is unimportant to the vast majority.
There are many reasons why this is overblown. The main reason is that the gripe was with the sequential read and writes, and for most of us using a base MB Air, we will be limited by the external device's speed, and 1.6Gbps will be more than enough for our phone, cameras and SD cards!
What is vastly more critical are the random reads and writes, as they are what swap uses. They are some of the best and better than the M1. An example of iniquity is that the new Galaxy Book3 Pro has half the random read and writes of the base M2 MB Air! Yet no one is testing that out to see how poorly it will perform versus the M2 Air! Interestingly, Max Tech did a video where he compared M2 MB Air versus the new Galaxy Book3 Pro. Even though the 512GB SSD in the Samsung benched twice as fast in sequential speeds, it was slower transferring files due to the smaller cache in the SSD!
Without perspective and instead just spec-chasing for higher numbers, not understanding the intricacies of optimisation, hardware quality and software means people are left with a false fake impression that does not resemble reality.
Apple the king at selling
Don't update to latest OSX either it takes more RAM :(