Joe: (asks question) Krauss: (answers question) Joe: "woooooow" Krauss: "yh... isn't that amazing?" Repeats 20-30 times You can see the love of science in Krauss. It's almost like watching a child's amazement. A true lover of science. I love people like this
I like that Joe has enough sense to just shut up and listen. No offense meant, that's the right play. It must be kind of exhausting to have a 1 on 1 with him
Sean Carroll has exposed some of what Krauss says to be complete nonsense. I'd like to see those 2 have a conversation because I think Krauss is using language that can appeal to a broader audience and in doing so is getting the physics wrong as a byproduct of using that language.
“The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn.” Alvin Toffler Man I feel like this quote fits in almost everyone of Joes podcasts.
I want a tour. I can't wait to see the images from that thing. i wonder if it'll be more of the same galaxies or if we'll see strange primordial galaxies we never expected.
@@Tmoney7994 Sometimes allegations are just that. Absolutely ridiculous how the system is so in favor of "guilty until proven innocent" instead of "innocent unless proven guilty"
I study physics and I'm in the midst of doing my midterm exams... Just before listening to this, I felt like dropping out of the program I am so mentally wiped out right now! Hahaha!! But listening to Lawrence Krauss is reigniting my love of physics :-)
Lla derat Definitely agree with you. These sceintists and colourfull guys like Alex Jones or Steven Greer, Jon Ronson are amongst my favourite episodes. The sceince episodes are damn interesting and educational, Jones and Greer are or total nutheads or damn good, but interesting anyway, and guys like Ronson just great storytellers with their own ways of thinking. I'm all in for less comedians or fighters and more sceince and conspiracy !
It's in the pipeline it seems, It should be either the next episode of The Waking Up Podcast, or the one after that. I think there has been some reshuffling of the schedule recently.
I love the joe rogan show. It educational yet entertaining and funny. Open minded and yet skeptical. Its unique and at times mind blowing. Great stuff to listen to!
I Love these podcasts on Astrophysics, theoretical physics and quantum mechanics. They put reality into perspective and how minuscule/moronic the divisive issues plaguing society today are.
Roblox&MinecraftPokemonMaster777 It was minor, he's the same as ever. But probably a little less keen on travelling 6000 miles just to do a three-hour pop-cult podcast.
Joe just gave a theoretical physicist a chance to educate for 2.5 hours in front of 300k youtube views and probably over a million downloads. I don't think any other media place can do that for science and were lucky to have Joe.
"For those that dont believe in gravity, walk out the window of the 13th floor and test your theory. and do it before you reproduce" -LK ...... best ever
So true but the only problem is the "edgy braaa crew" will repeat the Flat Earth motto of "you would still fall bc your body's mass is heavier than the air braaaaaaa, not gravity, duhhhhhhh..release a helium balloon out that same window and it'll float, where's the gravity braaaaa?!?" 😔💣💥
BroFroAnoMoFo HIP HOP Are you kidding? You are right! You can’t be serious?....... if you are go back to school. If this was a joke that was some funny shit!!!
I don’t know what the fuck we live on. But, gravity is just a theory. You gotta know that. Not even a good theory if you actually think about it. My point being is, no need to make fun of flat earthers. If you looked into flat earth there are some definite arguments of what we’ve all been taught. I’ll tell you what. I’m now convinced we have all been lied to on a grand scale. I’m not saying I believe either way. I’m not pickin a text fight here by all means. Just some understanding for those who believe in flat earth. There is now 10s of millions and growing fast who believe in flat earth. They can’t all be nuts....can they.
mitch, he wanted to know WHY thats significant. it sounds obvious-if ui call the brakes the steering wheel and vice versa, the car still drives the same. sooo... what? likw, why does this matter?
123k1rky123 jmo119 No, if he's going to come alone with no opposition. We have to take his word like it's religion. Please help me understand this; THEY claim, there are black holes because THEY can view stars orbit around them however every repeatable, observable, measurable experiment that YOU and I can do will show all the stars rotate around the North Star Polaris in perfect circle without intersecting. Look up time lapse of stars! At one point in the interview after saying some bs without evidence he says "I know it sounds crazy but it's true" This is religion not science. You know you've lost an argument when you attact people's character and that's what Krauss does with Flat Earth. Even though earlier he mentions science isnt rigid and we should be skeptical. Haha wake up people and truely be skeptical. Rogan is a very critical thinker in many different subjects but for some reason he has a block when it comes to cosmology. Remember at the end of it all "scientists" like Krauss get paid a lot of money to create math that you and I CANNOT understand. Only the enlightened physicist after spending years on the one solution created will make sense of it. This sounds like religious folks and their holy book that only a few can truely understand the original texts. Hahaha, it's the same thing! I'm not religious so I can't believe anything that I cannot with repeatable, measurable, observable experiments prove myself. The great Tim Ferriss always quotes Mark Twain - When you find yourself in the side of the majority (Believing in scientists, instead of knowing the experiments) it is time to pause and reflect.
The fact that the phrase "when we weigh galaxies" can be thrown into a conversation so casually really illustrates just how far humanity has come since living in caves, gnawing on bones by the fire. I wish I could be around to see how much farther we can still get in an equal time span into the future from where we are today.
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep What? Are you saying you think our technology today is NOT much further along than ice age agriculture and bread baking by the fire? I don't get what point you're trying to make.
Eratosthenes calculated the size of the Earth. Thanks, Joe. Today I have watched Brian Grazer, Sir Roger Penrose, and now Laurence Krauss, and all of these have been life asserting and life enriching.
+Contexual Harassment Science is our best possible means of discerning concrete objective truth within our epistemic limits. If a god exists, science will help us find it. Of course, if you define god in such a way as to make it unfalsifiable, you might as well drop the idea altogether...
It is unwise to insist upon a literal interpretation of figurative statements of which the inaccuracy may, at any moment, be rendered evident by the progress of scientific discovery; but the fundamental propositions of religion, so far from having anything to fear from the discoveries of science, are strengthened and ennobled by being brought into harmony with those discoveries. And it is only when the religious sentiment shall have been enlightened by its union with scientific truth that religious belief, thus rendered invulnerable to the attacks of skepticism, will take the place of skepticism in the minds and hearts of men.
I was really waiting for him to make a point. He spent the first half hour, like... an entire half hour, explaining that a rose by any other name would still smell as sweet.
Exactly. The names we give to things are arbitrary. AND? Why did this guy write a whole book about this? A lot of these theoretical physics guys drive me crazy. They think about these things that are interesting, but pointless.
U 2 are insufferable idiots thinking they are better cuz u observe ur 1 level above dunning kruger over others that they position their conversation for to include everyone, both of u fail to understand WHY this is important which is why you are painfully insufferable
@@MrNinjaone1 You attack others for pointing out the absurdity and incosequentialism of the point he spent basically half an hour trying to explain, namely that labels don't matter. I think this is a problem with scientists and academia too, if it's not some weird ritual thing designed to keep information inside, they really just aren't good at communication.
@@FugueSt4te i dont know if im misunderstanding u or if that u dont understand hes taking logically sound steps to help others understand in some certain dimensions these examples were presented, hes helping people trust science that dont, im fairly confident thats why he takes his time to go to joe rogan podcast lol, i cant tell if u guys are trolls
I understand it's a joke, but saying that people who don't understand science need to kill themselves and not reproduce isn't particularly funny. Most people aren't beyond redemption
Lightning-- Lawrence Krauss seems to be one of those scientists who has zero tolerance for religion, like Richard Dawkins. I think it comes out mean but he wholeheartedly believes religion is ruining our world. That kind of passion makes him fearless with his words so he's not afraid of what others think. I hope you didn't take him personally. He means well.
First 30 mins, I was absolutely scratching my head waiting for something. Glad I kept listening. I love when these type of guest come on. I would love Joe having more science guest. And/Or having more science debates like the episode with Graham Hancock, Randall Carlson, and Michael Shermer, that was great.
@@briannairby3080 As Ricky Gervais said to Lawrence on Lawrence's podcast the reason people laugh because they know that there is an element of truth to it. That's why the funniest person you know is not the world's funniest comedian it's your friends or family members, when you see them in a situation and you'd know what they do and there is an element of humour there. If your friend brags about how he's always quick on his feet and falls down you laugh because you know what he usually would say. It's fascinating.
behdabra jmo119 No, if he's going to come alone with no opposition. We have to take his word like it's religion. Please help me understand this; THEY claim, there are black holes because THEY can view stars orbit around them however every repeatable, observable, measurable experiment that YOU and I can do will show all the stars rotate around the North Star Polaris in perfect circle without intersecting. Look up time lapse of stars! At one point in the interview after saying some bs without evidence he says "I know it sounds crazy but it's true" This is religion not science. You know you've lost an argument when you attact people's character and that's what Krauss does with Flat Earth. Even though earlier he mentions science isnt rigid and we should be skeptical. Haha wake up people and truely be skeptical. Rogan is a very critical thinker in many different subjects but for some reason he has a block when it comes to cosmology. Remember at the end of it all "scientists" like Krauss get paid a lot of money to create math that you and I CANNOT understand. Only the enlightened physicist after spending years on the one solution created will make sense of it. This sounds like religious folks and their holy book that only a few can truely understand the original texts. Hahaha, it's the same thing! I'm not religious so I can't believe anything that I cannot with repeatable, measurable, observable experiments prove myself. The great Tim Ferriss always quotes Mark Twain - When you find yourself in the side of the majority (Believing in scientists, instead of knowing the experiments) it is time to pause and reflect.
Joe Knapp If lost in all the writing please just look up timelapse of the stars and explain a black hole with those images that you and I can create with less than $1000 in camera gear.
behdabra but can krauss proof "the big bang really happened" sure evolution is very realistic but big bang how the fuck would anybody know 100% and they act like it is 100%
Dude seriously this is the best episode of you listening and your face expression makes me laugh so hard. But salute for the courage that made you interview Krauss.
On this podcast, Joe, I saw you made funny beautiful faces that I have never seen you make before. This podcast was a delicious one. I have seen Laurence Kraus before, but this was wonderful. Hope he's on again.
@@DT-hk8gj i didnt mean by courage that Joe isnt capable enough to interview anyone in that matter, but the courage to challange his ability to continue educate himself and sharpen his knowledge. Not anyone can do it the way he do it. I admire him and admire his dedication to learn. Yet i couldnt help it with the way face expression looked at the time. Sorry, i just saw your message, never intended to ignore you mate
I didn't downvote it but It's probably because this guy talks in circles and the way he spoke was relatively annoying. I enjoyed the content still but it was pretty hard to listen to.
Alejandro, your reply to LA Waitress make no sense at all. I thought your original comment was about people and their reason for disliking the podcast. I'm not sure how you went from her saying this guy acts like he knows everything to talking about religious beliefs.
I'm a bit late to comment, well, due to my "local" definition I"m not! Lawrence Krauss, my favorite scientist talking to my favorite celeb personality, Joe, this is an absolute pleasure to watch. Thank you for doing this. I don't know if anyone else could. It takes a true person of quality and honest interest to do this.
@@stza16 www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2019/07/12/former-asu-physicist-lawrence-krauss-got-250-k-jeffrey-epstein/1718659001/ It was a donation to a program they were doing,not like some hush $ or anything, just a donation for research to the school. Not saying i know everything, but it sounds like a normal donation for scientific research, but who knows? Only he does i guess. Plus whos gonna turn down 250k for research?
Sad thing is that if you investigate they are not trolls. They 100% passionate believe the Earth is flat. Look at flat earth channels and then investigate the users in comment sections. They clearly watch hundreds of videos on the subject. I know it is hard for healthy people with normal brains to understand that someone is just that stupid. But NEVER NEVER EVER underestimate stupid. And yes they are assholes in the true sense on the word. A hole full of crap where the brain should be :)
billy elliot I convinced my neighbor and my cousin the earth is not flat. They thought we thought something completely different kinda like a miscommunication. But once I drew out a full picture they are now embarrassed about how ignorant they sounded.
So basically, a bunch of atoms(me) are reading a comment on a bunch of atoms(my phone) written by a bunch of atoms (you) about a bunch of atoms(krauss) spending its life studying another bunch of atoms. Dang! That's a lot of atoms. 🤣
@@markdelej science is so damn fun dude! Like the other day I was thinking how they say 90% of an atom is nothing but empty space,cuz electron n protons only occupy small space. So even though we are solid but still we are hollow. Crazy!
ka boom!! Well i did my undergrad degree in physics and that 90% of atoms being empty space is not true. It is just something people always say to try show that science is amazing but is not really the case. At the scale of an atom protons and neutrons are in the centre and around them is a electron “cloud”. This cloud is like the electron is smeared out into all places at once, and each position around the nucleus has a probability associated with the electron being there. But while nothing is measuring the electron, it is in a super position of all possible locations around the nucleus (like a smeared out wave/cloud). So when you see an atom drawn on paper of an electron orbiting a nucleus like the way planets orbit the sun, that is not real at all. However when you do measure the position of an electron round a nucleus, all possible positions will collapse, except one, where it will seem the electron is in one position. If you go on google images and type in “electron cloud” it will give you a better picture of an atom. Then type in “electron orbitals” and that will show you the complex shapes that electron clouds can be in. That is much more realistic to what is going on. The simple picture of an atom with electrons orbiting around like planets is still very useful for scientists as it simplifies the picture and we can still calculate and predict things from that picture, so it is a simple model, but is not actually real.
Lawrence krauss is the perfect example of why we shouldn't judge a book by its cover, he looks like a mad scientist but is actually a pretty wholesome person
@Divergent Integral it's obviously fake shit because of the metoo movement, there's no evidence of the claims, not even a name or testimony, complete bs just like how neil dgrasse tyson was framed
Lawrence Krauss explaining Gauge symmetry seals the deal for all existential debates. We're all defining the same thing using different words but no matter how we define it, the laws remain the same. So no matter if you have a scientific or religious view point on life and the universe, it doesn't matter. We're describing the same thing using different terminolgy. So let's get on merging our views of the physical and metaphysical into one and finally start making real evolutionary progress.
I can’t help but type people now. You can just tell he’s high in openness/ intellect and low in agreeableness (like most good scientists). Maybe high or above average in extroversion too. Either way this dude is a great physicist. One of my favorite educators 🤓🔥
Amazing guest, watched when this came out and rewatched this evening. Pre-ordered Degrasse-Tyson's new book "Astrophysics for people in hurry" (here on mon/tues). Was looking at related books and saw him co-authoring with with Krauss and someone else and will be reading this after. Prior to these podcasts I had much less understanding (near as much an interest) and am now very much looking forward to understanding these concepts with the simplicity these gentlemen are able to convey them to me to (with the understanding they fully understand them). Ideas that will blow my mind simply, "so amazing you couldn't make them up." To paraphrase a cliche statement. Truly hope Joe keeps getting guests like this on occasionally (or more than occasionally) because he's able to conceive of and ask questions I wish I could have thought to ask a mind like Krauss, where I might think I would but would be at a loss sitting down with him, Joe's interested for everybody listening and learning constantly himself.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding Gage Symmetry, but what he's describing seems like the most obvious thing in the world. He's making it seem so complicated but the fact that words are arbitrary and do not alter the characteristics of physical phenomena is like preschool stuff for any empiricist. Not sure what the big deal is. Am I understanding this incorrectly?
This seems like labelling certain things doesn't change the way they actually work, they're just labels right? So, when you're listening to people deep into sciences, they talk about concepts that seem so face-palmingly obvious to people listening to them, however, it's the obvious stuff that physicists and what not are trying to break through because often times common sense can be destroyed by experiment/study. Now, gauge symmetry is actually a part of quantum field theory, and that's way too complicated to discuss, but the use of symmetry throughout physics in general is that it means you can apply equations to completely different systems. Coloumb's law (or potential) is identical to the gravitational force equation. F = Gmm/r^2, then electric force is E = kqq/r^2. Eerily similar right? The first equation describes that the force of gravity is dependent on the two masses interacting. The product of those two m's, the masses, determines the force of gravity between them. In the electric force equation, qq are the two charges, and the product of the charges determines the electric force. The others are constants (r^2 is the radius squared, which just means the distance between both particles squared). Now, symmetry is extremely useful in systems that are very similar. So when he talks about modeling ecosystems for example, differential equations can be used to determine fluctuations in populations. You could now apply that equation to possibly an entirely different system, like a cellular system, or a skeletal system, or a social system. It's basically a tool that is used to conquer new fields in physics and go into frontiers that are hazy. Does that make more sense?
Griffin Lester just as long as he doesn’t jump on the genders are arbitrary bandwagon.....I am a man.... I identify as a male... I prefer to have sex with females...lol
@@Raptured_and_back This was probably the most informative comment in the comment section, I still barely grasp it and probably now have more questions but at least It is somewhere in the ballpark
Crazy to see these two together, but not surprising. One of my all time favorites, though I'm a scientist. Let's have a super-podcast with Sam Harris, Lawrence Krauss, Rhonda Patrick, and Bas Rutten!
I feel like if you have a preconceived notion that you aren't going to understand something, you psych yourself out instead of just taking it one word at time. That's probably what happened with Joe.
I ask my son what he questioned today at school... lol I don’t ask what he learned 😛 just what he questioned. So funny you just said that about schools teaching kids answers not to ask questions... so on point 👍🏼 love it! I don’t ask him to question it to the point of acting up or disrupting class, just note the question in something taught and we’ll look it up when home. Then, if it has substance and needs more discussion, he’ll bring it up. He’s 12. So it works pretty well 😛 and we have fun looking things up 😎
Joe, please make a playlist for science episodes only. Thanks.
and more scientists pls! :D
and philosophy!
That is a good idea. To be honest, I only watch the science vids. I rarely watch the mma episodes or the other shit.
You're missing a lot of science when Eddie Bravo comes in mma episodes tho :P
Vilya
Lol
Joe: (asks question)
Krauss: (answers question)
Joe: "woooooow"
Krauss: "yh... isn't that amazing?"
Repeats 20-30 times
You can see the love of science in Krauss. It's almost like watching a child's amazement. A true lover of science. I love people like this
haha you nailed it, Joe "woooooow" Rogan
Normz thezoundman he is a great teacher, I love listening to his wit laced facts.
I like that Joe has enough sense to just shut up and listen. No offense meant, that's the right play. It must be kind of exhausting to have a 1 on 1 with him
Sean Carroll has exposed some of what Krauss says to be complete nonsense. I'd like to see those 2 have a conversation because I think Krauss is using language that can appeal to a broader audience and in doing so is getting the physics wrong as a byproduct of using that language.
^^ Can this stupid Islamic piece of shit please fuck off?
Joe, thanks for having guests like this on your show. I love this stuff.
I have to echo this comment. So glad Joe is having guests like this on. Krauss is fantastic to listen to.
jerry crock
I love listening to him as well.
I can see Lawrence Krauss aging into Professor Farnsworth from Futurama.
I can also picture him one day saying, "I no longer want to live on this planet anymore."
“The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn.”
Alvin Toffler
Man I feel like this quote fits in almost everyone of Joes podcasts.
I am an engineer on the James Webb Space Telescope, we're in Redondo if you ever want a tour Joe.
Are you guys hiring? I'm a RF network engineer who plays Star Wars Galaxies for most of my shift.
I could use a new guild..
Best reply in this entire comment section ive seen.
Paul Kennedy damn. You are so lucky.
I want a tour. I can't wait to see the images from that thing. i wonder if it'll be more of the same galaxies or if we'll see strange primordial galaxies we never expected.
I can't wait for that thing to be launched! Thanks for contributing to something awesome.
It’s been too long! get this man back on the podcast
No way. He fried my brain lol
He's disgraced by sexual misconduct allegations now lol. Not sure if Joe will bring him back
Trevor Mulcrone legend
SJW drama is hot right now
@@Tmoney7994 Sometimes allegations are just that. Absolutely ridiculous how the system is so in favor of "guilty until proven innocent" instead of "innocent unless proven guilty"
I study physics and I'm in the midst of doing my midterm exams... Just before listening to this, I felt like dropping out of the program I am so mentally wiped out right now! Hahaha!! But listening to Lawrence Krauss is reigniting my love of physics :-)
Even though i am a week late to reply, i hope you did well!
i would like an update on the midterm
@@seewhyaneyesee p
I love you bro, Neil DeGrasse Tyson and now Lawrence Krauss. Bring more science people in!
he had Brian Cox too
what episode was that?
hi... this is just ' scientism ' Research Flat Earth.. Eddie Bravo knows it !
Lla derat Definitely agree with you. These sceintists and colourfull guys like Alex Jones or Steven Greer, Jon Ronson are amongst my favourite episodes. The sceince episodes are damn interesting and educational, Jones and Greer are or total nutheads or damn good, but interesting anyway, and guys like Ronson just great storytellers with their own ways of thinking. I'm all in for less comedians or fighters and more sceince and conspiracy !
Flat Earth no
Very happy with this podcast. The conversation between Lawrence and Sam Harris is going to be incredibly interesting.
IvelLeCog when is that gonna happen and where? Haha
same question ^
It's in the pipeline it seems, It should be either the next episode of The Waking Up Podcast, or the one after that. I think there has been some reshuffling of the schedule recently.
I love the joe rogan show. It educational yet entertaining and funny. Open minded and yet skeptical.
Its unique and at times mind blowing.
Great stuff to listen to!
I Love these podcasts on Astrophysics, theoretical physics and quantum mechanics. They put reality into perspective and how minuscule/moronic the divisive issues plaguing society today are.
which other ones?
@@jonathantoruno6169 sean carroll, roger penrose ..
@@planety9697 Brian Cox, NDT, Brian Greene...
He needs to have Dawkins on. If he can get Tyson, he can get Dawkins
Jake Chafin i know right. Need dawkins for sure...soon lol
Pretty sure Dawkins had a stroke
Ben Simpson...damn. I hope he's okay...
Roblox&MinecraftPokemonMaster777 It was minor, he's the same as ever. But probably a little less keen on travelling 6000 miles just to do a three-hour pop-cult podcast.
Mr Dawkins will be singing (in tune) again soon.
Joe just gave a theoretical physicist a chance to educate for 2.5 hours in front of 300k youtube views and probably over a million downloads.
I don't think any other media place can do that for science and were lucky to have Joe.
Joe is the man
This is absolutely correct!!!
I feel happily educated.
The amount of shit I’ve learned from listening to a comedians podcast is astounding.
"For those that dont believe in gravity, walk out the window of the 13th floor and test your theory. and do it before you reproduce" -LK ...... best ever
So true but the only problem is the "edgy braaa crew" will repeat the Flat Earth motto of "you would still fall bc your body's mass is heavier than the air braaaaaaa, not gravity, duhhhhhhh..release a helium balloon out that same window and it'll float, where's the gravity braaaaa?!?" 😔💣💥
BroFroAnoMoFo HIP HOP Ya man Flat Earthers are crazy af
BroFroAnoMoFo HIP HOP Are you kidding? You are right! You can’t be serious?....... if you are go back to school. If this was a joke that was some funny shit!!!
And when the helium escapes the balloon it falls back to earth
I don’t know what the fuck we live on. But, gravity is just a theory. You gotta know that. Not even a good theory if you actually think about it. My point being is, no need to make fun of flat earthers. If you looked into flat earth there are some definite arguments of what we’ve all been taught. I’ll tell you what. I’m now convinced we have all been lied to on a grand scale. I’m not saying I believe either way. I’m not pickin a text fight here by all means. Just some understanding for those who believe in flat earth. There is now 10s of millions and growing fast who believe in flat earth. They can’t all be nuts....can they.
3 years plus later and still wanting some more Lawrence Krauss with Joe
even after knowing that krauss was deeply connected to epstein?
imagine how good would it be if joe rogan had a christopher hitchens experience
Holy Weed ugh!!!! I don’t think anyone Christopher’s measure has sat across from joe .
I feel the same about Alan Watts. That would be great
It would be up there with elon musk. 3hrs of joe and hitch drinking scotch and Johnny Walker amber restorative
wow that one would be legendary
Maybe we can have it with AI in the future, after all we have lots and lots of recordings of his thoughts.
I think we're long overdue a new Lawrence Krauss episode!
@Marquis De Sade Woah, what? Oh jeez. I'll have to do some Googlin' about that... 🤯😬
Update: Well, shit.
Nick Latham can you give us a quick overview on what that’s about??
a podcast with a man was fired for sexual misconduct, who received money from Epstein and defended him....
ermining1 Yes as you may have seen in my reply to Marquis De Sade I wasn’t aware of his involvement with Epstein, or his sexual misconduct.
@@helloitsnicko right? Just found this out... way to fuck yourself I guess.
If you shut your eyes you can hear Rex from toy story talking about physics
sahsplishsplash litterly had to look up who actually did his voice 😂
He looks like him too, uglyboi
Inconceivable!!
Drew Adams
lol
LOL, Krauss's knowledge & patience seems to be as unlimited, as Joe's ability to come up with new questions :'D
what a great day this is right when I'm stoned
Yoo, i was just thinking that
90% of percentages are made up on the spot.
I'm high 90% of the time.
wow you're so sick
i smoke so much weed I dont even get high
Lawrence Krauss always reminded me of Professor Frink from The Simpsons.
Kyle Sanders Good news, everyone! I’ve got terrible news.....
He always reminded me of Elton John lol
Oy-glayvin. Hahah.
lawerence krauss is the exact opposite of eddie bravo
absolutely right
and they are both beautiful people in their own way
Dónal Healy Wish Eddie was on this episode as well!!
Dónal Healy who's eddie bravo? I only know Johnny bravo ;)
I love em both haha
Haha Lawrence was about to say “bullshit” but quickly changed to “ultimately wrong” 47:35
a-heheeheh
It sounds like it was cut
Wow this was an awesome one. Great guest to have on!
he's a grade A douche bag.
puff FLAT EARTH IS REAL!!!
Give us proof its flat???, wheres the edge???, good luck......
puff Joe needs to learn some necromancy so he can do a podcast with Terence McKenna.
puff whiney fuckin guest
I'm impressed that Rogan is able to keep up in this conversation, says alot about his intellect
mitch, he wanted to know WHY thats significant. it sounds obvious-if ui call the brakes the steering wheel and vice versa, the car still drives the same. sooo... what? likw, why does this matter?
Mer ffs lol, if you are defending Joe Rogan in that situation, it speaks volumes about your intelligence.
Stop being a snob - Joe's a very, very well-read guy
MmmHmm yes, that is why it takes him 30 minutes to repeatedly go over something that a highschool student could learn in 5 minutes max.
Put it this way: I'd rather Joe ask Krauss too many questions, rather than too few.
this is so far one of my favorite guest.
I like how Rogan is really prepared, almost every question he asked I was like "I wanted to ask that too".
Rogan trying to concentrate stoned
And through his incoherent stuttering
Throught the guest's rambling.
I think that goes for a lot of us; it could be that all of those kicks to the head are finally taking their toll on Joe, albeit.
He's not stoned
Wake N Bake ..looks like a tool..I'm joe and I smoke dmt so I know everything..Fuckin wanker
You have to try and get Elon man, that would be crazy.
vladimir chavez for the full 3 hours!
yeah that wouldnt happen if hell froze over
It's difficult enough for people to get him to do a 20 minute TED Talk.. That would be amazing though!
YEEEESSSS
Elon too busy planning shit in his hollowed out volcano
I love how Lawrence is passionate about science and Joe's curiosity.
They make the best scientists
This man scientifically / mathematically explained thoughts I've had since I was a kid.
Exactly!
Great communicator. Discovered him here ua-cam.com/video/uSwJuOPG4FI/v-deo.html
Being scared of death~
And Joe seemed to ruin it the entire time... rather watch him w/ Lex
@@cram3004 whos lex?
Its always fun to listen to REALLY smart people struggle to dumb down topics for normal people.
Labeld clarify, pleas
Charles Barnes listen to some of Krauss's lectures, then listen to him here. It's got to be tuff to talk about some of this stuff in laymen's terms.
Feynman had no problem doing it.
He was special though.
200 IQ aye.
These shows have def opened my mind and much better than TV all around
TV sucks
if you like podcasts you should check out jimmy norton
Joe "did you see Ex Machina?" Rogan
Joe "you ever tried DMT?" Rogan
I want to try dmt now
@@theelostuchiha2157 putting dumb shit in quotes between peoples names was never clever. please stop
fuck you joe rogan fans hahahahaha
Can someone pinpoint the exact podcast where Joe got obsessed on ex machina
Joe Rogan is a fantastic interviewer.
Krauss: "God is worse than Saddam Hussein, he tortures people forever!"
Rogan: "My wife bought a sauna suit."
Lmao
People torture themselves than blame God. The universe cant follow the rule of what it creates.
Humans are manipulated by their own creations
Go Rogan Go Rogan.....!
@@allplacedj1428 I think he is referring to the concept of hell...
no fukin way you got Lawrence krauss on. Nice job man
123k1rky123 he's a space fraud. He had to come on
why is it such a big deal? you're acting like krauss is a bigger celebrity than rogan lol
123k1rky123 jmo119 No, if he's going to come alone with no opposition. We have to take his word like it's religion.
Please help me understand this;
THEY claim, there are black holes because THEY can view stars orbit around them however every repeatable, observable, measurable experiment that YOU and I can do will show all the stars rotate around the North Star Polaris in perfect circle without intersecting.
Look up time lapse of stars!
At one point in the interview after saying some bs without evidence he says "I know it sounds crazy but it's true" This is religion not science.
You know you've lost an argument when you attact people's character and that's what Krauss does with Flat Earth. Even though earlier he mentions science isnt rigid and we should be skeptical. Haha wake up people and truely be skeptical.
Rogan is a very critical thinker in many different subjects but for some reason he has a block when it comes to cosmology.
Remember at the end of it all "scientists" like Krauss get paid a lot of money to create math that you and I CANNOT understand. Only the enlightened physicist after spending years on the one solution created will make sense of it. This sounds like religious folks and their holy book that only a few can truely understand the original texts. Hahaha, it's the same thing!
I'm not religious so I can't believe anything that I cannot with repeatable, measurable, observable experiments prove myself.
The great Tim Ferriss always quotes Mark Twain - When you find yourself in the side of the majority (Believing in scientists, instead of knowing the experiments) it is time to pause and reflect.
I'm responsible for this I think. I've been tweeting them both for 2 months
Ks90e - All stars rotate around Polaris? You said it yourself " I CANNOT understand"
lawrence "its really neat" krauss... XD one of the best episodes of JRE Ive watched, Lawerences passion is so capitavating.
Can we have him again in the new studio plz
I love him, he is so nice to listen to! Smart, articulate and mischievously funny!
This is definitely the most listen on repeat episode ever, I left this comment after I came back for the 5'th time now or more
Would be really cool if you got Elon Musk on JRE.
Mustache Dre agreed, Im sure hell show up.
Way too busy.
You asked for it like fk
def elon!! michio Kaku would be cool too!! you know they would both do this too!
Nietzsche "God is dead and we killed him" ironically appropriate for this episode.
The fact that the phrase "when we weigh galaxies" can be thrown into a conversation so casually really illustrates just how far humanity has come since living in caves, gnawing on bones by the fire. I wish I could be around to see how much farther we can still get in an equal time span into the future from where we are today.
If that's what you want to believe lol. We have evidence of agriculture, and humans making bakery products before the last ice age.
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep What? Are you saying you think our technology today is NOT much further along than ice age agriculture and bread baking by the fire? I don't get what point you're trying to make.
Joe Rogan is the only normal person that could have had this conversation with Lawrence Krauss and forwarded the conversation. Good job!
What do you mean by this?
that he is so stupid that thinks that only Rogan can articulate good questions to experts...
I hope not.
Eratosthenes calculated the size of the Earth. Thanks, Joe. Today I have watched Brian Grazer, Sir Roger Penrose, and now Laurence Krauss, and all of these have been life asserting and life enriching.
Tony Duncan :)
Joe's gotta get this guy together with Graham Hancock and watch the fireworks.
Krauss, Hancock, Alex Jones and Sam Harris.... Boom!
Jordan Peterson
Orbital Bonghit using Science to prove god is like using a hammer as a microscope
+Contexual Harassment Science is our best possible means of discerning concrete objective truth within our epistemic limits. If a god exists, science will help us find it. Of course, if you define god in such a way as to make it unfalsifiable, you might as well drop the idea altogether...
It is unwise to insist upon a literal interpretation of figurative statements of which the inaccuracy may, at any moment, be rendered evident by the progress of scientific discovery; but the fundamental propositions of religion, so far from having anything to fear from the discoveries of science, are strengthened and ennobled by being brought into harmony with those discoveries. And it is only when the religious sentiment shall have been enlightened by its union with scientific truth that religious belief, thus rendered invulnerable to the attacks of skepticism, will take the place of skepticism in the minds and hearts of men.
I was really waiting for him to make a point. He spent the first half hour, like... an entire half hour, explaining that a rose by any other name would still smell as sweet.
Exactly. The names we give to things are arbitrary. AND? Why did this guy write a whole book about this? A lot of these theoretical physics guys drive me crazy. They think about these things that are interesting, but pointless.
U 2 are insufferable idiots thinking they are better cuz u observe ur 1 level above dunning kruger over others that they position their conversation for to include everyone, both of u fail to understand WHY this is important which is why you are painfully insufferable
@@MrNinjaone1 i agree with them tho, i guess people have different mindsets woops
@@MrNinjaone1 You attack others for pointing out the absurdity and incosequentialism of the point he spent basically half an hour trying to explain, namely that labels don't matter. I think this is a problem with scientists and academia too, if it's not some weird ritual thing designed to keep information inside, they really just aren't good at communication.
@@FugueSt4te i dont know if im misunderstanding u or if that u dont understand hes taking logically sound steps to help others understand in some certain dimensions these examples were presented, hes helping people trust science that dont, im fairly confident thats why he takes his time to go to joe rogan podcast lol, i cant tell if u guys are trolls
I want another podcast episode with Lawrence! About time, isn't it?
Krauss is a scumbag. So no.
drz hahahaha then why the FUCK R u here brotha ? Yt baffles me sometimes
@@stza16 what happened
@@HackAcadmey He publicly defended Epstein after his sex offender conviction.
Podcasts with scientists and fight companion is what keeps me coming back. Great job, Joe.
Gravity test - "Jump out the window on the 13th floor. And do it before you reproduce." LMAO!
1:08:20
kind of funny but pretty fucked up too
Lightning not sure about that unless ur a flatty
I understand it's a joke, but saying that people who don't understand science need to kill themselves and not reproduce isn't particularly funny. Most people aren't beyond redemption
Lightning-- Lawrence Krauss seems to be one of those scientists who has zero tolerance for religion, like Richard Dawkins. I think it comes out mean but he wholeheartedly believes religion is ruining our world. That kind of passion makes him fearless with his words so he's not afraid of what others think.
I hope you didn't take him personally. He means well.
First 30 mins, I was absolutely scratching my head waiting for something. Glad I kept listening. I love when these type of guest come on. I would love Joe having more science guest. And/Or having more science debates like the episode with Graham Hancock, Randall Carlson, and Michael Shermer, that was great.
this should have been at least 5 hours long
100% agree.
more like 10
Agree!!
Play it in half speed :)
Can't tell if Joe is too high or not high enough for this.
"spank the vacuum" - best official physics terminology ever! :)
This is one of the best episodes I’ve seen on JRE can’t believe I missed it when it came out.
How did Lawrence keep a straight face when Joe threw in “decorating”?
Bc he’s gay
He's too smart for humor
@@briannairby3080 many very smart people have a great sense of humor. Actually, I think most do. Smart people like to laugh, too.
@@briannairby3080 As Ricky Gervais said to Lawrence on Lawrence's podcast the reason people laugh because they know that there is an element of truth to it. That's why the funniest person you know is not the world's funniest comedian it's your friends or family members, when you see them in a situation and you'd know what they do and there is an element of humour there. If your friend brags about how he's always quick on his feet and falls down you laugh because you know what he usually would say. It's fascinating.
Lawrence Krauss has a great mind! truly a genius, I learned a lot from this podcast.
behdabra jmo119 No, if he's going to come alone with no opposition. We have to take his word like it's religion.
Please help me understand this;
THEY claim, there are black holes because THEY can view stars orbit around them however every repeatable, observable, measurable experiment that YOU and I can do will show all the stars rotate around the North Star Polaris in perfect circle without intersecting.
Look up time lapse of stars!
At one point in the interview after saying some bs without evidence he says "I know it sounds crazy but it's true" This is religion not science.
You know you've lost an argument when you attact people's character and that's what Krauss does with Flat Earth. Even though earlier he mentions science isnt rigid and we should be skeptical. Haha wake up people and truely be skeptical.
Rogan is a very critical thinker in many different subjects but for some reason he has a block when it comes to cosmology.
Remember at the end of it all "scientists" like Krauss get paid a lot of money to create math that you and I CANNOT understand. Only the enlightened physicist after spending years on the one solution created will make sense of it. This sounds like religious folks and their holy book that only a few can truely understand the original texts. Hahaha, it's the same thing!
I'm not religious so I can't believe anything that I cannot with repeatable, measurable, observable experiments prove myself.
The great Tim Ferriss always quotes Mark Twain - When you find yourself in the side of the majority (Believing in scientists, instead of knowing the experiments) it is time to pause and reflect.
Joe Knapp If lost in all the writing please just look up timelapse of the stars and explain a black hole with those images that you and I can create with less than $1000 in camera gear.
behdabra You do indeed need help understanding.
You don't take his word you go and read for yourself and see what you think. That is science.
behdabra but can krauss proof "the big bang really happened"
sure evolution is very realistic but big bang how the fuck would anybody know 100% and they act like it is 100%
Dude seriously this is the best episode of you listening and your face expression makes me laugh so hard. But salute for the courage that made you interview Krauss.
B y would u need courage to interview him?
On this podcast, Joe, I saw you made funny beautiful faces that I have never seen you make before. This podcast was a delicious one. I have seen Laurence Kraus before, but this was wonderful. Hope he's on again.
@@DT-hk8gj i didnt mean by courage that Joe isnt capable enough to interview anyone in that matter, but the courage to challange his ability to continue educate himself and sharpen his knowledge. Not anyone can do it the way he do it. I admire him and admire his dedication to learn. Yet i couldnt help it with the way face expression looked at the time. Sorry, i just saw your message, never intended to ignore you mate
I love Lawrence Krauss! His book "a universe from nothing " was a really good book.
Eddie Bravo disliked this video.
Eddie doesn't know shit.
Eddie Bravo thinks that Lawrence Krauss is CGI
Alex F Eddie ''it's CGI bro..'' Bravo
Then Eddie bravo should stick to coloring books
I heard he's been having trouble breathing because he thinks oxygen is a conspiracy
Been waiting for years for Lawrence Krauss on JRE. Made my day for sure!!!!
Same
same same ! so happy !
JonnyBlaze2006 An Atheist pot head agrees an Atheist, WOW ! AND water is wet, the sky is blue and Earth is around!
Julio Gomez *round
JonnyBlaze2006 I've been a fan since The Physics of Star Trek.
I really have no idea why over a thousand people disliked this podcast. Someone help me speculate what rustled these people's jimmies?
I didn't downvote it but It's probably because this guy talks in circles and the way he spoke was relatively annoying. I enjoyed the content still but it was pretty hard to listen to.
This gentleman is a well known atheist/agnostic and refuses to believe anything without evidence.
LA Waitress Yet the religious tend to argue that everything that is worth knowing can be found in a single book...
Alejandro, your reply to LA Waitress make no sense at all. I thought your original comment was about people and their reason for disliking the podcast. I'm not sure how you went from her saying this guy acts like he knows everything to talking about religious beliefs.
Alejandro Betancourt You must be new to the internet....
After watching this whole interview, I have left with much respect and admiration for Lawrence Krauss.
I'm a bit late to comment, well, due to my "local" definition I"m not! Lawrence Krauss, my favorite scientist talking to my favorite celeb personality, Joe, this is an absolute pleasure to watch. Thank you for doing this. I don't know if anyone else could. It takes a true person of quality and honest interest to do this.
Joe, u invited Lawrence Kraus once
Plz invited again to ur amazing show
really enjoyed listening to u guys
im more motivated in science
just love it
Are you more motivated to support Jeffrey Epstein too?
@@stza16 he is a little too incendiary atm😅
@@stza16 www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2019/07/12/former-asu-physicist-lawrence-krauss-got-250-k-jeffrey-epstein/1718659001/
It was a donation to a program they were doing,not like some hush $ or anything, just a donation for research to the school. Not saying i know everything, but it sounds like a normal donation for scientific research, but who knows? Only he does i guess. Plus whos gonna turn down 250k for research?
Whiticus Washere Uhhhhhh.........
I hated science in school but I fucking love every single science podcast there is!
"We are a way for the Cosmos to know itself." - Carl Sagan
Fuck Carl Sagan
Fuck Sagan. He was paid by the CIA to debunk everything about UFOs. He was a friggin sell out.
@@SparkyMcBiff yup
@@SparkyMcBiff THATS FREAKING MEAN
@@SparkyMcBiff You believe in chemtrails, you are a moron.
You wish you were even 0.5% as amazing as Carl Sagan.
Wow, that speech at the end... If we are a simulation I bet even our creators had their mind blown by listening to this guy XDD
I think Flat Earthers are trolls.
I think anyone who references Flat Earthers, is an asshole, and a bigger troll!
Sad thing is that if you investigate they are not trolls. They 100% passionate believe the Earth is flat. Look at flat earth channels and then investigate the users in comment sections. They clearly watch hundreds of videos on the subject. I know it is hard for healthy people with normal brains to understand that someone is just that stupid. But NEVER NEVER EVER underestimate stupid. And yes they are assholes in the true sense on the word. A hole full of crap where the brain should be :)
ya think??!!
88Keyz102 the current flat earthers are the result of 4chan trolling. Its like an intelligence test, or a dummy identifier.
billy elliot I convinced my neighbor and my cousin the earth is not flat. They thought we thought something completely different kinda like a miscommunication. But once I drew out a full picture they are now embarrassed about how ignorant they sounded.
Lawrence Krauss is a bunch of atoms that have spent their existence trying to understand how atoms work
vehmic exactly, we are the universe being aware of itself in these different forms
So basically, a bunch of atoms(me) are reading a comment on a bunch of atoms(my phone) written by a bunch of atoms (you) about a bunch of atoms(krauss) spending its life studying another bunch of atoms. Dang! That's a lot of atoms. 🤣
ka boom!! Exactly and not one group of atoms actually fully knows how atoms work yet
@@markdelej science is so damn fun dude! Like the other day I was thinking how they say 90% of an atom is nothing but empty space,cuz electron n protons only occupy small space. So even though we are solid but still we are hollow. Crazy!
ka boom!! Well i did my undergrad degree in physics and that 90% of atoms being empty space is not true. It is just something people always say to try show that science is amazing but is not really the case. At the scale of an atom protons and neutrons are in the centre and around them is a electron “cloud”. This cloud is like the electron is smeared out into all places at once, and each position around the nucleus has a probability associated with the electron being there. But while nothing is measuring the electron, it is in a super position of all possible locations around the nucleus (like a smeared out wave/cloud). So when you see an atom drawn on paper of an electron orbiting a nucleus like the way planets orbit the sun, that is not real at all. However when you do measure the position of an electron round a nucleus, all possible positions will collapse, except one, where it will seem the electron is in one position. If you go on google images and type in “electron cloud” it will give you a better picture of an atom. Then type in “electron orbitals” and that will show you the complex shapes that electron clouds can be in. That is much more realistic to what is going on.
The simple picture of an atom with electrons orbiting around like planets is still very useful for scientists as it simplifies the picture and we can still calculate and predict things from that picture, so it is a simple model, but is not actually real.
Lawrence krauss is the perfect example of why we shouldn't judge a book by its cover, he looks like a mad scientist but is actually a pretty wholesome person
are you saying he is ugly on the cover?
Steven Boulanger no I said he looks like a mad scientist, can't you read?
@@nextgenfootball69420 i can read, just not sentence with 10+ words i guess
But he's still a mad scientist though. Wholesome and mad.
@Divergent Integral it's obviously fake shit because of the metoo movement, there's no evidence of the claims, not even a name or testimony, complete bs just like how neil dgrasse tyson was framed
This was a great episode. Its refreshing to listen to smart people for a change.
😂
The best podcast interview I've heard to date. Put it on to fall asleep to. Still awake at end. Big love
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough."
@Brandon Graham whoosh!
Lawrence Krauss explaining Gauge symmetry seals the deal for all existential debates. We're all defining the same thing using different words but no matter how we define it, the laws remain the same. So no matter if you have a scientific or religious view point on life and the universe, it doesn't matter. We're describing the same thing using different terminolgy. So let's get on merging our views of the physical and metaphysical into one and finally start making real evolutionary progress.
@Lorde: interesting ... i'm inclined to agree with you.... but I havent researched enough
Lorde AMEN. Posting video on this very tomorrow morning. The dude is an oxy moron.
This had to be my favorite podcast so far.. Thank you, Lawrence and Joe.. R'Amen!
that was amazing, krauss' passion for science is infectious
I can’t help but type people now. You can just tell he’s high in openness/ intellect and low in agreeableness (like most good scientists). Maybe high or above average in extroversion too. Either way this dude is a great physicist. One of my favorite educators 🤓🔥
Id pay to see him hunch over and yell "Inconceivable!"
As you wish
I didn't even know who he was before watching the podcast. Now he's one of the most intelligent person I know!
One of you're greatest podcasts ever done... so far
I cant handle this shit all at once. Im watching this over the course of a couple days
Krauss: Why is it dark on one side of the earth? Because of time zo-
Joe Rogan: Leprechauns
1:09:40
Lol wtf😂
Always a pleasure to listen to Lawrence Kraus. Can you get him back on the show Please?
It's because humans gave them names. The universe didn't name them. The rules stay the same no matter what language your speaking.
Yeah, that seemed much simpler than he was making it sound. I'm sure there's more to it...but, it didn't really sound like it.
This is exactly how I interpreted his explanation haha. Surely there has to be more too it with how complicated he made it sound
No. It’s that’s rules stay the same regardless of where you are in the universe so labels font matter. It’s not about language or the names of things.
Amazing guest, watched when this came out and rewatched this evening. Pre-ordered Degrasse-Tyson's new book "Astrophysics for people in hurry" (here on mon/tues). Was looking at related books and saw him co-authoring with with Krauss and someone else and will be reading this after. Prior to these podcasts I had much less understanding (near as much an interest) and am now very much looking forward to understanding these concepts with the simplicity these gentlemen are able to convey them to me to (with the understanding they fully understand them). Ideas that will blow my mind simply, "so amazing you couldn't make them up." To paraphrase a cliche statement.
Truly hope Joe keeps getting guests like this on occasionally (or more than occasionally) because he's able to conceive of and ask questions I wish I could have thought to ask a mind like Krauss, where I might think I would but would be at a loss sitting down with him, Joe's interested for everybody listening and learning constantly himself.
Holy shit, please get Lawrence to come back soon. That was amazing
I love how joe has a twist to add to many of these points that somehow involve psychedelics 😂
I can't believe I followed this as well as I did. Lawrence, I think I will be buying your book.
I really like Krauss, he's one of my all time favorite people to listen to.
Aside from when he S-s-s-s-stutters
Sharp, sharp Person, I'm glad He was on.
This podcast has legitimately made me a more intelligent and curious person
Maybe I'm misunderstanding Gage Symmetry, but what he's describing seems like the most obvious thing in the world. He's making it seem so complicated but the fact that words are arbitrary and do not alter the characteristics of physical phenomena is like preschool stuff for any empiricist. Not sure what the big deal is. Am I understanding this incorrectly?
This seems like labelling certain things doesn't change the way they actually work, they're just labels right? So, when you're listening to people deep into sciences, they talk about concepts that seem so face-palmingly obvious to people listening to them, however, it's the obvious stuff that physicists and what not are trying to break through because often times common sense can be destroyed by experiment/study. Now, gauge symmetry is actually a part of quantum field theory, and that's way too complicated to discuss, but the use of symmetry throughout physics in general is that it means you can apply equations to completely different systems. Coloumb's law (or potential) is identical to the gravitational force equation. F = Gmm/r^2, then electric force is E = kqq/r^2. Eerily similar right? The first equation describes that the force of gravity is dependent on the two masses interacting. The product of those two m's, the masses, determines the force of gravity between them. In the electric force equation, qq are the two charges, and the product of the charges determines the electric force. The others are constants (r^2 is the radius squared, which just means the distance between both particles squared). Now, symmetry is extremely useful in systems that are very similar. So when he talks about modeling ecosystems for example, differential equations can be used to determine fluctuations in populations. You could now apply that equation to possibly an entirely different system, like a cellular system, or a skeletal system, or a social system. It's basically a tool that is used to conquer new fields in physics and go into frontiers that are hazy. Does that make more sense?
FrozenIn Time yes! Thank you amazing stuff
Griffin Lester just as long as he doesn’t jump on the genders are arbitrary bandwagon.....I am a man.... I identify as a male... I prefer to have sex with females...lol
You don’t understand it.
@@Raptured_and_back This was probably the most informative comment in the comment section, I still barely grasp it and probably now have more questions but at least It is somewhere in the ballpark
Crazy to see these two together, but not surprising. One of my all time favorites, though I'm a scientist. Let's have a super-podcast with Sam Harris, Lawrence Krauss, Rhonda Patrick, and Bas Rutten!
Chemical Craig throw 2CHAINZ in there and I'm down.
Or even Michael Gira of the experimental rock band "Swans".
Wish to have him on again. Love this man he talks with so much passion and explains stuff quick
Thank you Joe for helping me 'meet' a dude I never heard of that has instantly become one of my heroes🤘
Hey listeners, I just want to say you bettered yourself by listening to this.
Did anyone else find gauge symmetry easy to digest? I felt like Joe struggled grasping it more than he should have.
I feel like if you have a preconceived notion that you aren't going to understand something, you psych yourself out instead of just taking it one word at time. That's probably what happened with Joe.
@@stephaniecripps4417 Yeah, that's probably a fair assessment.
I read the concept on other books. There are other symmetries as well, such as running time in reverse, or swapping particles with antiparticles
I can dig it
To much pot
I ask my son what he questioned today at school... lol I don’t ask what he learned 😛 just what he questioned. So funny you just said that about schools teaching kids answers not to ask questions... so on point 👍🏼 love it! I don’t ask him to question it to the point of acting up or disrupting class, just note the question in something taught and we’ll look it up when home. Then, if it has substance and needs more discussion, he’ll bring it up. He’s 12. So it works pretty well 😛 and we have fun looking things up 😎
Krauss is one of my favourite scientists.Loved his books