Google is not evil Google it's a good platform to help people like me be certified give me a lot of knowledge Google it's not just for watching videos and stupid things it's for knowledge certifications we do it for free
Too right, specifically now as they seem to greatly contribute to disseminating racial hatred, segregation and unrest through allowing a lot of unverified heavy truncated clips targeted at triggering social unrest and divide by dark forces
@@andreiradu7708 I don't know about that. I'm not making a political point. And if I am, it wouldn't be pro-right-wing! But I constantly see UA-cam promoting very low value content in some of my areas of specialization while suppressing content with higher views and quality. I suspect that their algorithm gives more weight to content from certain geographic locations, among other questionable practices. They generate playlists at the top of search results containing low quality content, unrelated stuff, and misinformation, excluding opposing narratives, and don't allow such lists to be flagged as misinformation. Frankly, I'm surprised to see my above comment is public because they constantly make them private/invisible for no justifiable reason while real hate speech shows up all over the place.
They should be required by law to notify you if your "free speech" is removed hidden or changed, give a reason, and give you a place to appeal. And that place of appeal should not be them. Think accurate online communication isn't important? 3.5 billion people worldwide every day. Think again.
It's a dump now. The paid-for/promoted/advertized search results are at the top, they're getting paid to promote whomever pays for it. It's pathetic. And they turned UA-cam into a dump of ads too, more so than usual.
Advertising has always been the same on TV why any different on the internet if your silly to look at the first adds anyway you will never find bargains
UA-cam shouldn’t have folded during the adpocalypse back a couple years ago it’s sad creators have to have a patreon or be sponsored by war thunder just to make the videos they made for free before
I hope that Safari, Firefox, and other non-Google web browsers allow for more choice in search when running a browser for the first time. Similar to what Microsoft had to do with Browser Choice back in the 2010s with Internet Explorer.
@@curtarnolds That's fine, it is already a well-known fact that Edge works well with other Microsoft products, just as Chrome works well with other Google products. What is ridiculous is that Google has to go out of their way to essentially buy market share from competing browsers like Firefox, Opera, Safari, and the like.
4:50 "...The current dominant players... shouldn't be the players controlling the next era of AI innovation..." China's response: BYD (Build Your Dreams) Google, Microsoft & Meta response: IYD (In Your Dreams)
@@kramchancel1266 you cant use other search engines because there are restrictions that some websites have on sharing their data with anyone else but google...hence why this law matters. This ruling is a win for free speech and the ability for all people to step away from the monopolistic practices that chains us
The action was started by Trump administration and continued by Biden administration I willing to believe the Supreme Court would rule 7-0 against Google
I hate to break it to you but Microsoft also has a monopoly just on operating systems instead. Google being embedded on android phones is also a terrible thing but not using it kills functionality as apps like to randomly not support it. I think people assume that because companies often get away with being a monopoly that it just should be okay.
This only open the doors for a bigger monopoly down the line. I can see OpenAI rising as common vehicle for information in the near future and judging by how things are being run over there, I’m not super optimistic.
Is it just me or does the "expert" look like he borrowed his Dad's blazer and was worried his Mother might call him down for dinner during the interview? Lol.
In a multiverse: The US government joins OpenAI, they reach an agreement. A few months later, OpenAI announces a search engine. A few weeks later, Google is on the verge of losing online search monopoly. The combos are communicating.
They are a monopoly... and monopoly is bad for consumers - innovation stagnates and the prices go up. Also, businesses that have monopoly can easily remove their competitors from the market by simply buying out their shares and taking over the smaller companies where the true innovation comes from. It's not that Google does "business" better than anyone else, but rather that, as a monopoly, they have too much power. Similarly, Apple would have never changed to USB-C if not for legal dispute of anti-consumerism. Just think about it, how many millions did Apple earn from their dongles?
Microsoft got away with embedding IE in their Windows OS. I expect Google will cite the Microsoft case and also get away with it. I know a browser and a search engine are different things, but they're both doorways to the internet, advertising and other means of profit generation.
Everybody's hating on Google because Google helps regular people like me that have no money to go to college and be certified Google help me be certified for free that's why I didn't want to destroy Google because Google helps people like me
People use google because its flawless,simple and doesnt cost the user only network charges for connecting via your handset to the internet....why try to upset the apple cart ???
Hi BBC. I’ve just looked at your next video. *_Rioters in England and Wales could be charged with terrorism offences, prosecutor says_* Is there any reason why comments are not open?
G -search is not based what you search it's based who pays most for advertising, so it's pretty much been useless long time allready. G. was originally the best because it was the only search engine to fing what you actually was searching, but they turned it totally opposite.
idk man, google's been good so far, and it's monopoly allows it to do many innovative things and that achieves the same goal as a competitive market, just more reliably. I dont care if it's illegal, it does good for our society IMO.
The lawyer has absolutely no idea what he is talking about. It seems the in fashion way is to give no credit to those that invented and created and took all the risks, and for weedy little characters to squeal how unfair that is. Looking forward to my $10 a month payment to access googles search engine 🤦
I still believe in capitalism. By that I mean the right for small businesses to compete without fear of getting crushed by one big one. I miss the days when you could look up information on Google and not get 5 pages of advertisements.
I haven't used google search for jack for years now as all the top spots are just paid advertisement anyway. I still remember their original slogan that stated they would never have ads lol.
I firmly believe that if other search engines emerged that were better then people would switch. People are more tech savvy that you think. But google is just the best search engine. Maybe AI features will change things, and Microsoft own chatgpt, but they're side products are often fairly lacking in user experience Like windows phones, mixer, zune ect, even skype went down hill after it was acquired. Teams is pretty good.
Not really. A decade ago, Firefox and Google, today, Firefox and Google, 20 years from now, Firefox and Google, that's the winning combo, and it always will be.
@@lexruptor that’s a monopoly. Google pays them to be their search engine. Sounds like you are ok with a monopoly because that’s all you’ve ever known. Might as well quit innovating and bow to corporate overlords I guess.
Not true For most of us, we use Google because we dont have any other choice We choose steam because they care about us and dont force features upon us that we dont like Google on the other hand is a monopoly that doesnt have any viable competitor I assure you, if there would be a search engine competing with Google that acted the same way as steam did, then most of us would have already moved on
This isn’t harming anyone since 99% of ppl use google seach already lol they should rather charge google for showing websites content on the search results
I think the Americans are confused between Monopoly and moderator but Americans can't handle a conversation that intelligent you have to make it simple for them, not everything in life is simple 🤓🤓
Is Google paying Apple and Samsung billions of money to make their search engine the default one any different from companies paying Google, UA-cam, etc to put up their ads to sell their products?
@@Boyhowdy875 Yeah, it is completely up to you and everyone has freedom to do so. But most people still use google because they are already satisfied with the functionality and stability that google provides. If they were not happy with google as the default browser, then they would just try to find a better one.
The difference is in the effect it has on competitors- advertising is accessible to all competitors who have the budget to advertise. An exclusivity contract is only for the highest bidder who then uses that exclusivity to snuff out any competition. A monopoly of any industry will always be to the detriment of consumers(especially in the long run) as the provider no longer has any incentive to invest in improving their product to attract/retain consumers.
video comment: Rioters in England and Wales could be charged with terror offences, prosecutor says Comment: In Morocco, they would receive a maximum of 50 days in prison for disorderly conduct. It's not 10 years for the government to lie about migrants. They protected England's interests: (banks, etc., businesses that don't have to pay taxes)
I own a search engine and I’m not related with Google. There is no monopoly 😊 The problem is other - Google is collecting personal data. They have monopoly in general because they tracking and collecting data for everyone using their services. Your personal data is more valuable than the services they offer you in exchange. They will be happy to pay the same fine year after year.
«Без ножа режут»: домработница Аллы Пугачевой высказалась о певице Людмила эмоционально пообщалась с прессой. p.s. дама решила на волне "общего маиданного протеста" покачать тут права за украинский сепаратизм, за право на расстрел гражданских, за право на мародерства и убииства без суда, просто так ради утоления жажды крови и забавы. она решила полоббировать и покрышевать этот подход - древней ксенофобии по языковому принципу, созданной презрением и ненавистью к собственной истории и собственной стране. ни капли жалости. мало... мало били!.. нужно еще!.. что б ни одной швали неповадно было!
Ever since Google changed their motto of "Don't do Evil," they've been doing a lot of evil. Good ruling.
Google is not evil Google it's a good platform to help people like me be certified give me a lot of knowledge Google it's not just for watching videos and stupid things it's for knowledge certifications we do it for free
Any motto that starts with that, clearly has something nefarious going on in the background
UA-cam's questionable, discriminatory, censoring algorithms should also be investigated.
Too right, specifically now as they seem to greatly contribute to disseminating racial hatred, segregation and unrest through allowing a lot of unverified heavy truncated clips targeted at triggering social unrest and divide by dark forces
@@andreiradu7708 I don't know about that. I'm not making a political point. And if I am, it wouldn't be pro-right-wing! But I constantly see UA-cam promoting very low value content in some of my areas of specialization while suppressing content with higher views and quality. I suspect that their algorithm gives more weight to content from certain geographic locations, among other questionable practices. They generate playlists at the top of search results containing low quality content, unrelated stuff, and misinformation, excluding opposing narratives, and don't allow such lists to be flagged as misinformation. Frankly, I'm surprised to see my above comment is public because they constantly make them private/invisible for no justifiable reason while real hate speech shows up all over the place.
I agree. UA-cam is acting disgracefully
They should be required by law to notify you if your "free speech" is removed hidden or changed, give a reason, and give you a place to appeal. And that place of appeal should not be them.
Think accurate online communication isn't important? 3.5 billion people worldwide every day. Think again.
Bit like the BBC really. Completely discriminatory.
It's a dump now. The paid-for/promoted/advertized search results are at the top, they're getting paid to promote whomever pays for it. It's pathetic. And they turned UA-cam into a dump of ads too, more so than usual.
Advertising has always been the same on TV why any different on the internet if your silly to look at the first adds anyway you will never find bargains
UA-cam shouldn’t have folded during the adpocalypse back a couple years ago it’s sad creators have to have a patreon or be sponsored by war thunder just to make the videos they made for free before
Agree.
Be thankful whatever u have .Without ads everything there wouldn't be any social media running .
@@luffymonkey4232you say that like it would be a bad thing
It is about time.
The irony of the BBC reporting on someone else having a monopoly is not lost
British people are allergic to irony. The americans got don lemon to interview elon musk 😂😂😂 by ignoring cnn
This took long enough!!! This was obvious years ago!!!
Go away bot.
@@Isclachauyou gay
😂😂😂😂
I liked the search engines in the 1990s. Web Crawler, Alta Vista etc. The internet was fun back then.
I hope that Safari, Firefox, and other non-Google web browsers allow for more choice in search when running a browser for the first time. Similar to what Microsoft had to do with Browser Choice back in the 2010s with Internet Explorer.
Microsoft is forcing Bing and Edge down user's throats though
@@curtarnolds That's fine, it is already a well-known fact that Edge works well with other Microsoft products, just as Chrome works well with other Google products. What is ridiculous is that Google has to go out of their way to essentially buy market share from competing browsers like Firefox, Opera, Safari, and the like.
@@Awesome_Aasimaren't Firefox and opera browsers, not search engines?
Best search engine? For the last ten years it's impossible to find what you're looking for.
google has become terrible in the last 5 yearss never shows you want you wamt to see and research it only gives you one or two pages
Not at all surprised
Google search is useless now. Along with many others.
Firefox and other browsers depend on Google for funding. This ruling could end up trading the search monopoly with a browser monopoly.
4:50 "...The current dominant players... shouldn't be the players controlling the next era of AI innovation..."
China's response: BYD (Build Your Dreams)
Google, Microsoft & Meta response: IYD (In Your Dreams)
that's okay, just appeal it all they way up to supreme court, which can be bought anyway so why even bother
nothing is stopping you from using other search engines
Look into the judge ruling on the case and his political affiliations, very interesting..
@kramchancel1266 Nothing is stopping us enforcing laws that protect consumers and fair competition either!
@@kramchancel1266 you cant use other search engines because there are restrictions that some websites have on sharing their data with anyone else but google...hence why this law matters. This ruling is a win for free speech and the ability for all people to step away from the monopolistic practices that chains us
The action was started by Trump administration and continued by Biden administration
I willing to believe the Supreme Court would rule 7-0 against Google
Amazon should make a search engine.
I've started using Microsoft edge and honestly it offered a lot more than chrome.
I haven't used that garbage in years
UA-cam's new logo should say under it, "dude, where's your comment?"
Google got all the money they can get.
Time for some new players to get into the search market.
Lol Google is embbeded into Android OS Systems. This is like telling Windows to stop coming with Explorer or Microsoft Edge.
So... a good idea?
And Bing as the default search engine!
So you openly admit that you don't have the intelligence to choose another search engine? How incredibly pathetic.
I hate to break it to you but Microsoft also has a monopoly just on operating systems instead. Google being embedded on android phones is also a terrible thing but not using it kills functionality as apps like to randomly not support it. I think people assume that because companies often get away with being a monopoly that it just should be okay.
United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation, 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001)
This only open the doors for a bigger monopoly down the line. I can see OpenAI rising as common vehicle for information in the near future and judging by how things are being run over there, I’m not super optimistic.
Google good. Other companies bad. Being a skeptic paints you as one. In with the new and out with the old - including your flimsy belief system.
Imagine we lived in a world where Ask Jeeves became the big guys, or Bing, or Excite.
Where it was common place to say I'll yahoo it.
"hey Jeeves"
Is it just me or does the "expert" look like he borrowed his Dad's blazer and was worried his Mother might call him down for dinner during the interview? Lol.
Lok
Wait til you see how Warren Buffet, Bill gates, Elon Musk dress. It's actually not indicative of success and expertise.....
Finally! I have been waiting for this for decades now!
Awaiting for Microsoft Too...Monopoly is not good...
In a multiverse: The US government joins OpenAI, they reach an agreement. A few months later, OpenAI announces a search engine. A few weeks later, Google is on the verge of losing online search monopoly. The combos are communicating.
For what it’s worth every tech savvy person I know uses a different search engine because of their data collecting practices & out of principle.
I’m guessing the DOJ didn’t get a cut in the money and finally went after them 😂 what a joke.
It is illegal to be good in a business in Usa
They are a monopoly... and monopoly is bad for consumers - innovation stagnates and the prices go up. Also, businesses that have monopoly can easily remove their competitors from the market by simply buying out their shares and taking over the smaller companies where the true innovation comes from. It's not that Google does "business" better than anyone else, but rather that, as a monopoly, they have too much power. Similarly, Apple would have never changed to USB-C if not for legal dispute of anti-consumerism. Just think about it, how many millions did Apple earn from their dongles?
Man USA is on a streak.
Yeah, we should google other search engines.
Google, You had it coming! Monopoly is illegal!
So are they shutting down?
Nope. Nothing will happen, the status quo will retain.
@@Connie_TinuityError doubt it, they’re not as good as Apple!
@@Connie_TinuityError>Nothing ever happens
So what does this actually mean for consumers lol
3:38
Nothing in reality
Nothing rn but a good ruling regardless for the future since more competition is always better for consumers
It doesnt mean anything.Google is done. AI is here and it is replacing search engines.
Microsoft got away with embedding IE in their Windows OS. I expect Google will cite the Microsoft case and also get away with it.
I know a browser and a search engine are different things, but they're both doorways to the internet, advertising and other means of profit generation.
Everybody's hating on Google because Google helps regular people like me that have no money to go to college and be certified Google help me be certified for free that's why I didn't want to destroy Google because Google helps people like me
This is exactly like the conversation between Zuckerberg and and the councl
What about Bing? Aren't they a competitor
They use google
@@Amarok-p6l No they don't lol
People use google because its flawless,simple and doesnt cost the user only network charges for connecting via your handset to the internet....why try to upset the apple cart ???
Hi BBC. I’ve just looked at your next video. *_Rioters in England and Wales could be charged with terrorism offences, prosecutor says_* Is there any reason why comments are not open?
Been wondering that myself.
Sly News play the same game. The reason is they know the vast majority will rip them to shreds.
How will they report...? If they do that, the queen will not give them funds....😅
Because they know we are the majority
Because unlike other internet places, BBC doesn’t allow their space to by used by racists to promote hate.
Finally justice
Good.
It is The best search engine. I will use google in any devices. not anything else. They display results I want that do not on other search engine.
The logo,is the tactic,ever seen colors arranged differentially that your mind interprates as cake
little too late for that ruling lol
G -search is not based what you search it's based who pays most for advertising, so it's pretty much been useless long time allready. G. was originally the best because it was the only search engine to fing what you actually was searching, but they turned it totally opposite.
idk man, google's been good so far, and it's monopoly allows it to do many innovative things and that achieves the same goal as a competitive market, just more reliably. I dont care if it's illegal, it does good for our society IMO.
*Go girl!
They just better than others, competition cannot keep up😂
Oooooooh.. Daddy China's not going to be impressed with this logical court outcome at all.
Lady, focus on UK
I don’t care about the monopoly, I care that they keep all my data.
When illegal war and occupation is cool, this is among the issues called peanuts.
Finally some GOOD news.🎉
By USA everything is legal,
The lawyer has absolutely no idea what he is talking about. It seems the in fashion way is to give no credit to those that invented and created and took all the risks, and for weedy little characters to squeal how unfair that is. Looking forward to my $10 a month payment to access googles search engine 🤦
Yup, just another little jealous commie rat. Disgusting, and the damn judge who made this ruling too
Gotta make sure you get a mention of AI in there to keep people interested lol.
I still believe in capitalism. By that I mean the right for small businesses to compete without fear of getting crushed by one big one. I miss the days when you could look up information on Google and not get 5 pages of advertisements.
If all companies were angels, no regulations would be necessary.
I haven't used google search for jack for years now as all the top spots are just paid advertisement anyway. I still remember their original slogan that stated they would never have ads lol.
Finally Justice
Good!
Maybe bing should be more useful idk
I firmly believe that if other search engines emerged that were better then people would switch. People are more tech savvy that you think.
But google is just the best search engine.
Maybe AI features will change things, and Microsoft own chatgpt, but they're side products are often fairly lacking in user experience
Like windows phones, mixer, zune ect, even skype went down hill after it was acquired.
Teams is pretty good.
google is the worst search engine
Not really. A decade ago, Firefox and Google, today, Firefox and Google, 20 years from now, Firefox and Google, that's the winning combo, and it always will be.
@@lexruptor that’s a monopoly. Google pays them to be their search engine. Sounds like you are ok with a monopoly because that’s all you’ve ever known. Might as well quit innovating and bow to corporate overlords I guess.
Alphabet supresses them and actively makes results slower on Chrome.
why did this take so long though?
I like Google search 🤷♂️
As a user we don't care, we use Google because we like it, just like why we use Steam for games, the user decides what they like
You don't speak for everyone, muppet. Steam has competition from GOG and Epic. There is no competition between Google and other search engines.
Not true
For most of us, we use Google because we dont have any other choice
We choose steam because they care about us and dont force features upon us that we dont like
Google on the other hand is a monopoly that doesnt have any viable competitor
I assure you, if there would be a search engine competing with Google that acted the same way as steam did, then most of us would have already moved on
as a moron you don't care, the only reason there is alternative because of google's anticompetitive behaviour. users care
U.K. riots. all comments on BBC threads NOT OPEN . Nuff said . Scared of what will be said
Noones scared mate, relax yourself
Okay i just REWATCHED the movie 'the internship'😂😂😂 and i am convinced google was behind the entire project....master marketers
Turned off the comments for UK riot videos..
Ladies and gentlemen this is supposed to be "free" media with high ranking in journalism... lol
This isn’t harming anyone since 99% of ppl use google seach already lol they should rather charge google for showing websites content on the search results
I think the Americans are confused between Monopoly and moderator but Americans can't handle a conversation that intelligent you have to make it simple for them, not everything in life is simple 🤓🤓
so people choose to use the best service available n now that illeagal
No user is being forced to use Google Search or Chrome, this is just the government wanting a piece of the pie.
the people that aren't tech savvy (which is most people) don't know how to change it and Google is the default
Government doesn’t get anything out of this ruling.
@@CJBroonie sure, keep on telling yourself that.
Bad news for Harris
Small tech businesses should organize to ensure that an appeal by Google does not overturn the verdict.
I prefer Google not Bing 😂😂😂
Wtf am i gonna do? Use Opera 😂😂😂 Why would anyone want a search engine with absolutely no concrete results.
The ruling doesn’t ban google’s search engine. Just can’t monopolize the market.
do you know theres more search engines than google and bing right??
Yeah big reveal ....monopoly capitalism !
Google achieved this through hard work
🤣
Other search engines and browsers are terrible though.
But Google paid to have it's app used on those phones. It's advertising. I won't used other search engines because they don't cut it.
Is Google paying Apple and Samsung billions of money to make their search engine the default one any different from companies paying Google, UA-cam, etc to put up their ads to sell their products?
And yet, I still don't use Google because I am able to choose another search engine as I can think for myself.
@@Boyhowdy875 Yeah, it is completely up to you and everyone has freedom to do so. But most people still use google because they are already satisfied with the functionality and stability that google provides. If they were not happy with google as the default browser, then they would just try to find a better one.
The difference is in the effect it has on competitors- advertising is accessible to all competitors who have the budget to advertise. An exclusivity contract is only for the highest bidder who then uses that exclusivity to snuff out any competition. A monopoly of any industry will always be to the detriment of consumers(especially in the long run) as the provider no longer has any incentive to invest in improving their product to attract/retain consumers.
If Microsoft can get sued for Monopoly…
They were almost broken up back in 1998 when they were bundling internet explorer in windows and forcing other companies to use it.
if the DOJ doenst sue and broken up the company in 2000s there will be no google and apple to this date
We need to have a discussion about Generative AI!🤖 ❤
Firefox is the way to go 😂 firefox doesnt depend on google and it filters out all the crap google allows 😂❤
Shoukd we use russian or other dictaturs browsers?!
Turn on the comments on the riot videos you cowards!!!
Google search results are useless.
What are you searching for?
BBC is 💩
So what search engine you recommend instead?
@@markmd9brave
Google is terrible. Bias! I search for one thing and their search promote other stuff. What a joke!
video comment:
Rioters in England and Wales could be charged with terror offences, prosecutor says
Comment:
In Morocco, they would receive a maximum of 50 days in prison for disorderly conduct. It's not 10 years for the government to lie about migrants. They protected England's interests: (banks, etc., businesses that don't have to pay taxes)
Google search is too good.
and others don't have resources to improve them cause they only take up 10% of market share
Give that judge a promotion now
THIS WOULD HAVE NEVER HAPPENED IF WE LOST WW2 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭🥰😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
Only Baidu can survive from Google. LoL 🤣
I own a search engine and I’m not related with Google. There is no monopoly 😊 The problem is other - Google is collecting personal data. They have monopoly in general because they tracking and collecting data for everyone using their services. Your personal data is more valuable than the services they offer you in exchange. They will be happy to pay the same fine year after year.
No monopoly? You own a search engine? Who? Ask jeeves? Psshht
@@jessejamez5985 please take a breath then share again your thesis
The problem is the fact that Google pays to be the default search engine then uses their monopoly to raise ad rates.
«Без ножа режут»: домработница Аллы Пугачевой высказалась о певице
Людмила эмоционально пообщалась с прессой.
p.s.
дама решила на волне "общего маиданного протеста" покачать тут права за украинский сепаратизм, за право на расстрел гражданских, за право на мародерства и убииства без суда, просто так ради утоления жажды крови и забавы. она решила полоббировать и покрышевать этот подход - древней ксенофобии по языковому принципу, созданной презрением и ненавистью к собственной истории и собственной стране. ни капли жалости. мало... мало били!.. нужно еще!.. что б ни одной швали неповадно было!
горький юмор заключается в том что она топила за тех кто ее бы закопал в Бабьем яру, если бы не мы...
но что не сделаешь ради денег и визы! к черту историю! к черту Холокост!
вот он и пошел к черту по всем признакам...
будут еще активы которые необходимо обанкротить? не стесняитесь!
Samsung is a Korean chaebol (monopoly)...they love this kind of thing
With great power comes great responsibility! It's not okay to abuse your power with such a huge platform like Google.
Disgusting greed by Google. 👎
The only sensible judge in the US?
Lol 😂 what about apple??