Beyond Good and Evil by Friedrich Nietzsche - A 30-Minute Summary

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @juvetafrolovaite
    @juvetafrolovaite 5 місяців тому +3

    You narrate so good I don't even have to read them 😂 Joking, I might actually read some of these that I find really interesting.

  • @noself1028
    @noself1028 2 роки тому +11

    I’m reading Beyond Good and Evil now and find this video very helpful in facilitating my understanding. Thanks for posting!

  • @frankonthebeat
    @frankonthebeat 2 роки тому +6

    Brilliantly put, definitely aided and helped me in some parts I was not following properly. Thank you!

  • @sharkeyhaddad2476
    @sharkeyhaddad2476 5 місяців тому

    Well done

  • @brrrzrrkrr3434
    @brrrzrrkrr3434 Рік тому +4

    this was a cool way to prepare myself before reading

  • @davidstone5595
    @davidstone5595 8 місяців тому +1

    I was excited to watch but the voices are annoying 😑.
    Next...

  • @SkogliJotunn
    @SkogliJotunn 7 місяців тому

    All the talk of blinks. Leads me to a certain this is ripped, Otherwise known as stolen from blinkest

  • @to_3574
    @to_3574 2 роки тому

    On Nietzsche Ishay Landa -- Nietzsche, the Chinese Worker's Friend.pdf (PDFy mirror) : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

  • @WilhelminaBruno-f6n
    @WilhelminaBruno-f6n 9 днів тому

    Robinson Paul Jackson Melissa Rodriguez Anna

  • @BrennanWayneLuther
    @BrennanWayneLuther 3 місяці тому +1

    Plagiarism from Blinkist.

  • @Commercial_Investments
    @Commercial_Investments Рік тому +1

    Think about this roman men would sleep with children but now it’s bad? Who am to say what they did was wrong with something I do now could be wrong in some time ( I know pedo is bad)

    • @mikerx69
      @mikerx69 8 місяців тому +4

      You would know quickly if it was your child

    • @Needlestolearn
      @Needlestolearn 4 місяці тому

      @@mikerx69 He's essentially arguing that if good and evil are not objective truths but rather subjective experiences, then we can't judge historical figures based on our current moral values. Instead, our assessment is limited to how their actions would be perceived in today's society. If someone acted similarly today, they might be deemed wrong by prevailing societal norms, but the same actions from the past might not be considered inherently bad. This perspective suggests that good and evil are social constructs shaped by societal norms rather than objective realities.

    • @juancmf9634
      @juancmf9634 4 місяці тому

      @@Needlestolearn Yes, you can judge. You create your own values to judge stuff based on your experiences, despite of what others may think or not. You saying that people should not judge because values are subjective to each period of time is in itself a judgement. And who are you to tell others to not judge because values are subjective and it would be: "wrong"? Or: "bad"?. Why should we care about the values that the people of the future may take upon us?
      Judge on the values you create for yourself. For that, I solely reject your opinion

  • @LittleMew133
    @LittleMew133 Рік тому +4

    Can say i barely understood the original.

  • @안정석-s2w
    @안정석-s2w Рік тому +2

    Fasdcinating summary from Korea.