Relative Dating - Example 2

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 січ 2017
  • We take a look at a more complicated example of using principles of relative dating to order strata from youngest to oldest.
    Also, I know it's already a couple weeks into 2017. This video was recorded on January 3rd, just a few days into the new year.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 20

  • @FT-ql7lc
    @FT-ql7lc 4 роки тому +1

    Awesome tutorials on both example 1 & 2. Thank you so much for teaching us.

  • @aquagirl1118
    @aquagirl1118 6 років тому +4

    Great video thank you for the help!!

  • @eyemanpb
    @eyemanpb 6 років тому +3

    thank you so much for teaching

  • @lolaadewale1625
    @lolaadewale1625 6 років тому +10

    Still don’t get it

  • @melanieslank5296
    @melanieslank5296 2 роки тому +3

    How is it possible that only layers K, H, I, J, G were tilted? That would have to have happened after they were deposited and therefore the tilting should have effected everything that was already there (including everything below those layers in the diagram).....

  • @raniaelidrissi7336
    @raniaelidrissi7336 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much

  • @arabpowerbuilding3205
    @arabpowerbuilding3205 7 років тому +1

    Thank you 😊

  • @crisaquino5420
    @crisaquino5420 5 років тому +1

    Ur a great teacher 👨‍🏫

  • @samjam7449
    @samjam7449 5 років тому +2

    Load some more videos on geological maps pls

  • @kylelazcano3049
    @kylelazcano3049 3 роки тому

    THANK YOU

  • @brownguy51
    @brownguy51 7 років тому +5

    little confusing but thanks for the help

  • @taejin2648
    @taejin2648 6 років тому +10

    Your voice makes me sleep but thanks anyways

  • @alizajoyce2085
    @alizajoyce2085 6 років тому

    why is K notthe youngest and also, shouldnt be I younger than J ( J older than I) , because it has inclusions?..? pls reply asap sir thank you

    • @geologic7656
      @geologic7656  6 років тому

      Aliza Joy CE I is younger than J and I said this in the video. And yes, we know that because of the inclusions. Now K looks like it should be the youngest, but if we know that J came before I then K must have come before J. Think of it this way: all of the layers on the top (G H I J and K) are all tilted at the same angle and thus must have been deposited in a sequence. Because of the way they are oriented, one might think G came first and all of them were rotated by less than 90 degrees. But since J is in fact older than I, in order for that to be true, I would somehow have to be squeezed under J and above H which doesn't happen. The only possible explanation then is that the strata formed in the order K J L I H G, and then were tilted more than 180 degrees.
      Hope that helps!

    • @alizajoyce2085
      @alizajoyce2085 6 років тому

      Geo Logic oh okay... thank you very much!! !♡

  • @joinpriscilla
    @joinpriscilla 3 роки тому +4

    anyone else hate this

  • @xperiatv5530
    @xperiatv5530 6 років тому

    Please upload in hindi today

  • @ujjwalraj2246
    @ujjwalraj2246 2 роки тому

    THANK YOU