Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Jumbo 15202 vs 16202 Comparison Review

Contact Team Mosso for pricing and availability.
Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Shop the 15202: www.thewatchbo...
Shop all Audemars Piguet watches: www.thewatchbo...
SKU: 4707113
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak "Jumbo" Extra Thin 15202 vs "Jumbo" Extra Thin 50th Anniversary 16202
The Audemars Piguet Royal Oak "Jumbo" Extra Thin 15202 is encased in 39mm of stainless steel surrounding a blue Petite Tapiserrie dial on a stainless steel bracelet. Features of this Audemars Piguet Royal Oak "Jumbo" Extra Thin 15202 include hours, minutes and date. This Audemars Piguet watch also measures 8.2mm in thickness and 48.6mm from lug-to-lug.
The Audemars Piguet Royal Oak "Jumbo" Extra Thin 50th Anniversary 16202 is encased in 39mm of stainless steel surrounding a blue Petite Tapiserrie dial on a stainless steel bracelet. Features of this Audemars Piguet Royal Oak "Jumbo" Extra Thin 15202 include hours, minutes and date. This Audemars Piguet watch also measures 8.1mm in thickness and 49mm from lug-to-lug.
For complete details, watch the full review comparing the Royal Oak 15202 vs the Royal Oak 16202.
Please subscribe to our channel: www.youtube.co...
See our inventory, along with news and content from across the industry on our app: onelink.to/watc...
Visit thewatchbox.com for new arrivals, updated daily.

[@sanghoonlee5171]

The finish on that octagonal bezel just mesmerizes me every time I see it. It's not just the mirror shine, but the incredibly subtle and barely perceptible curvature.

[@ZeldaOtaku1]

Gerald Genta the goat

[@timeisahumanconstruct9251]

Regardless of the technical improvements that arrived with the 16202, I think in the long run, collectors will put a premium on the 15202 monobloc Royal Oaks and earlier models because as Tim said, the movement is better finished and it is truely an iconic movement that is not coming back.

[@rikt1541]

the new one is better color, the contrast is better

[@tuerkischermeister]

I have since been curious as to how a 26240ST would compare to a 26331ST, would really appreciate you juxtaposing the two if you ever get the chance! You inform us so meticulously and such requests pop up, thanks Tim!

[@jimmillett9224]

Another masterclass from Tim.

[@PhillyHank]

very informative review! 👍🏾
thx for posting🙏🏽
i can tell the new one bc the new one has a scratch on it around 7-8 o clock 😂

[@plumbless]

The easiest way to distinguish between the two at a glance is via the date windows. The new one has the right side of the frame in line with the edges of the tapisseries.

[@clf1905]

The best series🎉

[@opporknockitytoots]

On the new watch, the beveled edge on the crystal consistently picks up the indices, which isn’t true on the older model.

[@ultimaetsolder]

Good catch wow

[@timeisahumanconstruct9251]

Maybe the rehaut is taller or slightly angled to better reflect the dial?

[@carguy8270]

The new movement is historically irrelevant... the beauty of the 15202 was the homage to the original... 16202 is now just an ultra thin 39mm... over time I think collectors will shun the 16202

[@HRM.H]

I prefer the look of the older one. Better proportioned in my opinion

[@CristianGarcia-ou5zm]

😂

[@HRM.H]

​​@@CristianGarcia-ou5zmif you cant see the difference you might wanna get your eyes checked.. plenty people seem to agree with me

[@nagarjunablessed4904]

​@@HRM.Hnewer one is aeons more better and smoother.

[@groundhogday1]

Prefer the cheaper one.

[@nkonig1]

The one on the right looks newer. Crisper dial, steel is more vibrant.

[@marcn8750]

The 16202 date don’t does seem a tad bigger or perhaps more bold than the 15202.
My imagination or …?
Nice comparison Tim.
Best wishes from Singapore Marc

[@MrPINKFL0YD]

People always have to spot the difference. It seems to make them feel better and make them 'experts', at least in their own eyes.

[@desertdwellerpete]

39mm is jumbo??

[@golfinguru11]

Increase prices, lower the quality of finishing. Winning formula considering the average royal oak buyer these days. Sad.

[@timeisahumanconstruct9251]

Nailed it. AP has gone downhill over the last 15 years since Meylan left.

[@nagarjunablessed4904]

New model has crisper finishing you brokie bozo

[@BradGreenstein]

The title says "50th Anniversary 16202"...wouldn't that have the 50th Anniversary Rotor? It looks like its a regular 2023+ 16202!

[@the1916companywatchreviews]

I think somebody just copied an incorrect result of a google search for the name.
Best,
Tim

[@BradGreenstein]

Thanks Tim!! @@the1916companywatchreviews

[@marcn8750]

I personally like the 15300. But that’s just me.

[@BaoSik]

Plot twist: Both are fakes

[@nagarjunablessed4904]

What a cringe comment

[@Watchwatcher23]

First

[@JayzBeerz]

looks like a $5.00 G-Shock. LOL!

[@jamied931]

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HAHA

[@austincragin7391]

LOL ! MUAHAHAHAHA

[@nagarjunablessed4904]

Typical brokie comment

[@GEMSofGOD_com]

1 better color 2 thicker date. Obvious