2am here and i keep searching update 2019, of sonya6400 and the sony 18-105 lens , suddenly notify ! 💃🏼💃🏼💃🏼💃🏼wooo u make me get that lens than , kitlens omgoood i love the oss so smooth, i saw ur last video ... thank you for sharing!
Hey brother, i really like your channel and find it really useful and helpful for someone like me that is trying to get more into photography. Am recently working to get my first camera manly for landscape and street photography. Next year 2022 am going to do the caminho de Santiago pilgrimage and i really want to have a camera with me to do some landscape photography and some street photography during the 10 to 15 days that the pilgrimage will take to complete. In your opinion do you think that this combination of a sony a6400 and the 18-105 lens is a good combination for someone that is just starting. Am taking the Gopro hero 9 black for my POV and for vlogging, so the camera is strictly for photography. Thanks for everything and keep up the amazing work brother
Hey Paulo, that sounds like an awesome experience you have coming up. So it looks like you’re focused more on photography, which is great if that’s the case. Are you set on the Sony ecosystem and if so, have you seen the soon to be released Sony ZV-E10 amzn.to/2V3JDcl It’s very similar to the a6400 and is marketed to vloggers, however that’s really just a marketing angle because it’ll take great photos as well. And, for photos, I would steer you closer to the Tamron here: amzn.to/3zTiaZw Or the 18-135 here: amzn.to/3fcx8Ci The Tamron has a wider aperture which means it’ll let in more light. Either of these lenses would fit on the ZV-E10, a6400 or a6600.
I have this lens and am very happy with it. I want a low light lens/one lens do all and was thinking of the 16-55 but it’s toooooo expensive. With the tamron leak of 17-70 2.8 with stabilization, would you be tempted to sell your 18-105 for the upcoming tamron?
I’d really have to test it out, which I’m interested to do so. One concern I’d probably have is losing some of that focal length...however, I may also be pleasantly surprised and not really miss it 🤷♂️
Thanks for your nice video. I just bought A6400. I'm new in the cameras world but got a bit knowledge. now I need your recommendation. My main purpose mostly is filmmaking , and photography as well. SO what do think of below options 1- zoom lens Tamron 28-75 f2.8 + wide lens 16mm f1.4 2- zoom lens 18-105 f4 + 56mm f1.4 for portrait ?????? AND soon I will purchase a gimbal Weebill S.
So, the 18-105 combo paired up with the 56mm would be my choice if you're doing some portrait work, however I have used the 18-105 for some photo work, and it's fine...but not my primary choice as the 18-105 is better for video. The Tamron is a great lens, but it's for full-frame. The e-mount will certainly fit onto the 6400 (APS-C) body, but your focal length will be around 40mm -112mm. Not sure if that's a concern or not, but just wanted to highlight that.
Great video... I Just picked up the a6400 with the kit lens. I plan to shoot talking head vids for now so I was looking at the sigma 16 but now that I’ve come across this I’m wondering if I should get this one instead. Seems like this is more versatile lens. Any recommendations?
Congrats on the 6400. As far as talking head videos, I personally use the Sigma 16mm. For all of them actually. I did start out using the 18-105 for my talking head, and as long as you have decent lighting then it’ll be fine.
I just stumbled upon your vid. I've been eye balling the 18-105 for a while for my a6400 (also I love with my sigma 16mm 1.4) bro your vid is awsome!! I gotta get the 18-105 now. Just Subed to your Channel. When's this trip I'm ready to go 🤣
Hi I'm buying the A6400 with kitlens 16-50 and sony 18-105 f4. i want to buy one more lens but I'm confused whether i should go with the sigma16mm f1.4 or the sigma 30mm f1.4. My use is travel vlogging so what should i choose. Please let me know. Thank you I'm sorry kevin I'm here again but this is the last one I promise 😂
I have the 18-105 and the 16mm. It's a pretty stellar setup. So, I personally prefer the 16 over the 30...If I shoot portraits I end up using the 85mm. My 16-50 however hasn't seen much action in quite a long time, but definitely a hard lens to pass up for 100USD
Yeah it’s a great video lens, but I’d say the 18-135 is better for photography. I’ve gotten some nice shots with it, but I’ll admit I’ve had to take more shots than I normally would.
Thanks! Yes, all handheld. That's the beauty of having that OSS lens. The only thing I applied was optical flow with some of those speed ramps, but didn't need to apply stabilization in the other clips, like where I was walking around town vlogging...That's just the natural look out of that lens. I've had a lot of practice doing handheld as I used to vlog all the time and I'm usually more run and gun without stabilizers anyway... Although for commercial work I would mix it up between the two (handheld and a gimbal).
In 2020, are you still strong on the a6400? I'm considering getting it for my Dad. He has a woodworking shop he wants to start doing UA-cam videos in. Dimensions are a rectangular 200 sq.ft. (10'x20' approx). There will be lighting specifically for shooting (source lights, soft boxes, etc.). I believe I will end up doing most of the video work while he manages the tools lol. I don't have much experience with video, but knowing the constraints on the intended use; would the a6400 and this Sigma lens make sense for shooting these videos? I don't believe this lens has any macro function which is something I know he wants, for close up on certain tasks, but he is looking for a more cinematic look, rather than the prototypical wide angle shot that DIY'ers use. Really, wants to avoid the entire ensemble of prototypical UA-cam woodworking videos; the wide angle shot, normally coupled with the sped up video, backed by the chipmunk audio of shop sounds :D Not bashing it, I just know from speaking with him, that isn't his cup of tea, nor his intention. With the specific lighting in the shop for video work, I would imagine we could get away with f4, I think the main concern is the macro requirements, and if the shots will be too close given the shape of the garage, and the fact that there are tools to work around. Thanks!
I still use the 6400 daily. As far as the macro, you could look at something affordable like this lens from Sony: amzn.to/3n25mdy You can also just use it for portrait style, or just as a regular lens. It would be about a 50mm equivalent on a full-frame, but not built in zoom. It would be a fixed focal length. There are other macro options that are a bit more expensive though. Is he going to do any handheld shots or mostly locked of on a tripod or stand?
Hi Kevin, Appreciate the honest and candid reviews! Subbed and going through a few of your videos on Sony’s APCS cams and lenses. Nice Atlas backpack. I have the same. Super comfortable. Allan nailed it. I just purchased the a6600 for when I need portability and I don’t want to bring my ff. For stills, I shoot mostly landscape, street, portrait, products, action sports, and travel. I use mix of primes and zooms, in particular Tamron 17-28/2.8 and 28-75/2.8. I believe I can use them on the a6600 but it will be cropped 1.5x. For videos, I will start up and wanted to get your thoughts on the following options: - Option1: Go with the 10-18/4 (like the ultra-wide and OSS) + 18-105/4 (like the internal zoom and OSS) + Sigma 16/1.4 (for lowlight); or - Option2: Use my EF and EFS glasses with Viltrox EF-E ii which supposedly can take advantage of the afc but there is not much videos out there about it. I use the MC-11 for my ff bodies and stills works well (not all) but video afc doesn’t work. I just love Sony af system. Thanks in advance! Keep creating and stay safe.
Very thankful for your feedback! Yes, the Sony AF is just absurd how good it is. And, if you've done a little research then you might find that some of that EF glass may take advantage of it (I don't have any to test), but it depends on what you want/need for real world as far as how fast. Now, the Sigma you asked about here is freakin fast as a third party. Just as fast anything Sony native. I barely take take that lens off. I shoot with it so much. However I do love the 18-105. It was my first lens purchase. I strictly use this for video however. Sure, it can shoot photo and I did do a video on that with the a6500, but I'd steer you over to the 18-135 if you're going to use it mostly for photo. Although tough to beat the constant f4 though when punching in since the 18-135 is variable. Question though, how much to you think you'd be using the 10-18 if you had the Sigma? The equivalent FF focal length on the Sigma is 24mm, so if you need wider then I understand. Tamron is definitely a great lens...Have you already tried that on the a6600 to see what that looks like or are you still waiting on the body to come in? Just trying to see about pairing some things down here if needed and making sure you don't have too much overlap with your focal lengths, however I'll admit that it is nice to have some options.
Hi Kevin, Thanks for the quick reply. Yeah the EF lenses in stills with the MC-11 is very fast on the A9. Got it for a steal but the a6600 will get me into video. The a6600 is on the way so I need to wait for it to come to test it on the Tamron 17-28/2.8 and 28-75/2.8. They are both tact sharp and fast for stills. Haven’t done much with it on video Yes I don’t want overlap and heavy setup for video and why I am looking to see if the a6600 + 18-105/4 + 16/1.4 or 10-18/4 is a better combo. The 16/1.4 is great for lowlight + bokeh + tact sharp and the 10-18/4 has OSS + wider field of view. I’m new to video but plan to shoot broll, street, landscape, product, and travel. Which combo would you recommend? Thank you!
For video, I'm just going to go back to what my two (best) lenses are in my bag. The 18-105 and the Sigma 16. I've traveled with only these two lenses for video work and it's all I've needed. Except one scenario where the 10-18 may be more helpful and that is (for me) real estate video. This is where I highly recommend a wider angle...Now of course you don't have to be a real estate photographer or videographer. It's just nice if you find yourself getting establishing shots in tighter spaces. You'll likely get a little bit of lens distortion that you may need to crop in on or correct for in post, but very minimal. Let's throw in another thought. Are you aware about the "zoom" function with these cameras when using primes? You may have researched it, but I did a video on it. You don't have to check it out or anything, however it may help you think about getting just a touch more out of that 10-18 if you really want it. ua-cam.com/video/PYZLs5AhQ-I/v-deo.html
Hi Kevin, Thanks for sharing! Looks like I will get all 3 lenses then; 18-105/4 for all rounder with OSS, 16/1.4 for lowlight, and 10-18/4 for landscape. And thank you for the link. Yes I use the clear image function. It is programed in my C2 buttom as well as my C1 for Super35. I don’t use Super 35 as much as it crops from 24M to 10M.
Thanks, Kevin. I was wondering if it is worth buying a variable ND filter for this lens? I will be doing a lot of daytime shooting on vacation in Norway!
Great video! I have been considering switching to this combo for video purposes. I currently have a 6d Mark II with 70-200 F4 and 35mm F2. I really got it for photography but have found that I enjoy video work much more. I will be doing a wedding in August and then after that will mostly just film bow hunts? Would you think swapping my current setup for this one would be a good idea?
I think Sony for video work offers a bit more than what your current setup is... If you're already considering, then I'd say you're moving into a very capable piece of kit for video. This is APS-C, and not sure if you'd be more interested in full-frame... But honestly this camera (and the 6600) are more than capable.
@@KevinRossRN I think 18-105mm is the Best Lens for Vlogging, I had sold my A6400 due to Kit 16-50mm OIS was very bad, thinking to buy the A6400 again but this time with 18-105mm, Also the clear zoom is very useful!
I just bought my 18-105 lens have used it yet but I herd so much good stuff about this do you have any other recommendations for another lens that you use daily
Would you say this lens and the sigma 16 would be a good option for my first lenses to film weddings and other video projects or should I look elsewhere?
@@KevinRossRN I’m doing straight up video. I have the kit lens but I want one lens to do it all or two lens. Where do you recommend I start? I’m not trying to break the bank either lol
What are good lens for car photography. I have 6400 with 50mm lens . My next lens I want something what can give compression if needed also detailed pics . The 50mm I can shoot at night . I usually shoot sun set not dark dark
Kevin Ross yes a prime lens . And yeah that would help I’m also on a budget . I got the 18-105 for 400 basically new from a friend . Now I have about 250-300 for next lens
@@kong_5oh163 Have you looked at the Sigma 56: amzn.to/2xZbNcr (this is a bundle)... A little outside of your budget, but sharp. The 30mm is nice too, but would give you an "actual" 50mm. Unfortunately anything from Sony (OSS), except for the 50mm is hard to find within that budget. Have you looked at some of the Samyang lenses?
Great video! So since you said you are all about conversing with your subscribers in the comment section..I want to run something by you...7 months ago I got into drones...13 drones and a UA-cam channel later lol I have been using gopros and my iPhone XS for outdoor shots of the drones, talking to the camera and indoor unboxings and reviews. Now indoor my studio is kinda low light..even with some added lighting, so the GoPro hero 8 doesn’t do that well..plus I’m still learning the darn things and so I decided to start researching mirrorless cameras, lenses and all the technical stuff. Now that I feel more comfortable I have decided the Sony a6400 is the right camera for me. I’ll tell you what lenses I have in mind and why, and I was hoping you could tell me if I’m on the right path or if I should go with something else. I don’t just want to buy lenses for my drone video stuff, I’d like to have room to grow and experiment with landscape and portrait shots, as well as some sort of simple music videos for my music projects. So for low light, night time, reviews in my dark studio I figured the sigma 16mm would be good since it has that 1.8 or 1.4 (can’t remember at the moment) also I only have about 6-7 feet to move the camera away from me so I think it’ll be good to get myself, my desk and whatever I’m reviewing in the frame. But I also don’t want it to look to wide and stretched out. I figure it’ll be good for outdoor stuff too, dark or light! Then I thought since I can’t find a lens with that 1.4 or 1.8 aperture with a focal range of 18-100+ I might want to get another 1.4 or 1.8 prime lens like a 30mm or a 50mm, so I have another option for low light as well. Just sucks I won’t have the ability to zoom as far as I know...now for the daytime, bright sunny days I was thinking this lens, the 18-105. But I wonder is the f4 something you really need a Bright sunny day for? Would something closer to 2.0 or 3.0 be better? Since the other lenses I chose for low light can be adjusted to 4whatever aperture I need I consider those good for bright daylight as well. Most of what I do is for video by the way , but like I said I’d like to do some photography as well. So in summary..sigma 16mm, Sony 30mm and Sony 18/105. Does it sound like I’m on the right path? If I had to choose just two lenses for what I want to shoot which ones would you pick , or if I had to choose 3. I’m def not interested in the kit lenses lol. Anyways, sorry for the lengthy comment, thanks in advance for the help!
I appreciate all the information here. So let's break it down. As far as the Sigma 16mm, I really can't say enough good things about it. And, for your particular indoor need of being in a small space, it should be just fine. In my talking head portions of my videos (in studio) I'm about an arm's length away from the camera. As far as the zoom functionality on the prime lenses, I did do a video here: ua-cam.com/video/PYZLs5AhQ-I/v-deo.html You've got an option to get a bit more length out of the lens. Now, as far as the 30mm, it's also a great lens. The 56mm however would give you an 85mm equivalent and this could also be used for portraiture at a longer focal distance...if that's something you're interested in. The 18-105 for video is a tough one to beat. If you told me that you'd be doing more photo than video then I might steer you over to the 18-135: amzn.to/2B5vzFe It's better for photo in my opinion, but only slightly. It also has a variable aperture f/3.5-5.6, so not a constant f4 all the way through. If you're outside, then f/4 is fine. In fact, if you're in the sun then you're likely going to be somewhere at f/11 or higher. Unless you're using ND filters, which I most definitely use and I especially use these on the Sigma outdoors. It's almost a must have. As I've said before, if I had the 16mm and the 18-105 in my bag, then I wouldn't need much else. In fact, on many shoots these are often the only lenses in my bag for video. And you're right about the kit lens. Sure, it's nice as a start to get familiar with the camera and filmmaking, but once you go beyond the kit lens, it just takes your production way up.
Sorry for the bunched together text. sometimes I get to typing and forget to hit the return button lol. I know this wasn’t mentioned but I also found a 50mm 1.8 OSS for $150 used. And even though it’s not one I considered, for the price I thought why not? Def gonna go with the 16 and the 18-105 though! One other question, what is the Benefit of using a filter instead of adjusting the aperture?
$150, uh yeah. If it's in good shape, might as well. As far as the filter goes let's say that you'd like to have some bokeh or to keep some separation foreground and background, and being able to come in at f/1.4-2.0 to keep that separation would be hard in daylight as you'd be overexposed. The filter would give you that option of stopping down without messing with your aperture. And a kind of silly reason would be that it's also faster...but you also have to get used to a filter just so you're not vignetting or getting the "X" pattern across the lens...that happens more when you are really stopped down.
Thanks...And yes, 1080p 60, then upscaled. I do use 120 from time to time, but only in circumstances where I really need it, and in low light 120 is going to be a bit softer. I posted another video on stabilizing handheld footage (no gimbal) and I did shoot most (if not all) in 4K/30, and slowed some of it down without losing a lot of the quality.
Great video thanks for the info! Is the lens usable for indoor shooting? Like for interviews, cooking B roll etc. I don't have the budget for professional lighting, so I can only use desk lamps etc. And If i want bokey for b roll shots indoors, I suppose I'll need to zoom in to 50 mm and above, is it possible to get good stable handheld shots had this focal length?
The lens is great, but for bokeh, that’ll be a bit challenging because of the f/4. You’d want something in the 1.4 to 2.8 range. The lens is stabilized and I use it quite a bit for handheld footage. But, without that lighting you may have a tougher time with it. I’d prioritize lighting first, then the lens.
That's a great deal on the lens. You're going to thank me later when you invest in lighting. Here, I did a super budget lighting setup that could work: ua-cam.com/video/iWyRSea3agc/v-deo.html this is like hardware store, assemble it how you need to. Here's the Godox SL-60W: amzn.to/36dCr08 this should take you to an Amazon site in your country. I use these and also did videos on them as well. They're great to start, and very reasonably priced.
Nice vid 😊👍 i also own this lens and i love it... But my wife often complain, bcos she thinks that her face often looks shorter.. do u feel that this lens have a distortion result for portrait? I used it at arround 35-85mm f4.. 😊🙏 Thx
That's really interesting at that focal length you mentioned. I know that the wider Sigma 16mm does, but I've never really noted this with the 18-105... Have you tested it with other portraiture and getting similar results? Also, are you on the 6400?
@@KevinRossRN yes i'm on a6400 and i also own sima 16mm which i sometime use for portrait but on certain distance of course and it never let us down 😊👍 wanna try only to bring the 18-105 for travel but i have a big doubt now 😂
@@KevinRossRN actually i can but wanna stick with 1 lens only, cos already packed with tons of stuff for 3 kids 😂 that's the main reason... 😋 just wondering if u could try shoot and compare to another similiar focal length fixed portrait lens, and let me know the result. I would really appreciate it 🙏🙏🙏 nb: if only u have spare time 😊👍
Good lens, but it's better for photography. Also, it doesn't have internal zoom, the lens extends during zoom, which obviously will impact the use of that lens on a gimbal.
So, with the stabilized lens, it will help a bit with some of the warping that can occur with handheld, but rolling shutter is unfortunately not going to be corrected... This is just how the sensor is setup in these cameras... The full frame cameras do better with this, but it's still there... Although, not sure how much you follow Sony, but the soon to be released A7siii has significantly improved rolling shutter, or rather less rolling shutter. It's just the way these sensors sit in the camera body... I agree though, it's annoying.
@@KevinRossRN the full frame is kinda out of my reach lol. And I also filming for hobby and it might get commercial later idk. So I am thinking of getting these pair as my first serious camera. I mostly shoot with my phone right now. So would you suggest for this combo or maybe the a6500 suites better?
I would say to try and stay on budget because once you go full frame you will spend more on lenses (usually). The a6500 is still very capable. I still own this camera. The stabilization in the camera isn't the greatest, but it's there, and if you have a stabilized camera body, then this opens up more opportunities to invest in third party lenses... Which don't have stabilization in the lens, but are very sharp.
Since it's f4, I can typically get away with (in bright sunlight) with about 6-8 stops with this filter: amzn.to/2NLPvza For a lens that's wide open and I actually want to remain open for whatever reason, I'd bump up to a filter that can go between 12-16 stops depending on the conditions. Manual. When filming with these cameras so much you just get things set up where manual can still be "fast." Do you have this particular lens, or looking into picking one up?
@@KevinRossRN oh thx m8, i bought this lens already, would you recommend using the a6300 with the 18-105mm + the zhiyun crane m2 gimbal? Or is the set up too heavy for the smal gimbal?
@@pierrenj79 it's the Atlas Athlete Pack... My all time fav camera backpack. Definitely an investment, so not the cheapest, but worth it to protect my gear. Not sponsored, just my honest opinion.
@@KevinRossRN Bought the a6400 and I'm loving it, the kit lens is so sick with x2 zoom on video minimal loss, bought a 85mm sony 1.8 and I love the crop factor getting more telephoto-ish :) , I'm pairing it with my Canon 6D for video.
@@Tekillyah I use the 85mm for landscapes and also for a little sports photog. It's fast! Glad you're loving the 6400...and yes, that kit lens (for 100USD), is worth it.
Gotcha. So you're going to get similar performance, and the 10-18 being an f/4 throughout the focal length is also a benefit of the 18-105. This lens (the 18-105) was my first vlogging lens...the first lens I actually purchased. The 10-18 is definitely nice if you need that wider perspective, but as I said in the video, the 18mm works fine for me as far as distance from my face. I assume you've checked the 18mm focal length on your lens to see if you'll be okay with that starting focal length? The Sigma 16mm and the 18-105 are my two (main) lenses for just about all the filming I do out in the field. Do keep in mind that if you do purchase the 18-105 to double check that the firmware on the lens is updated...not that I had issues with it, but the update seemed to help grab focus quicker.
Fantastic question, and something I meant to address in this video specifically, although I may end up reviewing/comparing these lenses. A couple of differences is that the 18-135 has that variable aperture that may not suit certain filming conditions. The focal length goes to 135, which is obviously more than the 18-105, however if you're working on a gimbal, as you Zoom you start to lose the balance on that set up since the Zoom is not internal. The power zoom function on the 18-105 can also be a benefit with video. The 18-135 is a newer lens, and some say it's pretty sharp (and some say sharper than 18-105), but I think you'd have to ask yourself what you're going to be using the lens for primarily. For video, this lens is just really hard to beat for the price. What are you currently filming with? Or, are you looking to get into the Sony ecosystem?
@@KevinRossRN I don't work on anything specific. I have gear acquisition syndrome and I'm trying to squash it before I lose my mind. You have me leaning towards the 18-105 and hopefully I'll be done spending money.
@Kevin Ross I have the sigma trio which are great for photos on the A6500. I started tinkering with A-mount zooms because they were cheaper and had good specs but the adapter seems to cause the AF to suck. I haven’t really tried a lot of video and I know you video guys all seem to love the 18-105.
@@rondub If you've got the trio then you've definitely got a great set of tools there. Yes, I too went off a recommendation from a creator several years back regarding the 18-105 for video... Professionally it's paid for itself many times over, but even for some of the personal documentary work and other cinematic shots... It's more than filled the need. Can't imagine with the trio and the 18-105 (if you choose to get it) that you'd need anything else, but hey many of us do love gear acquisitions 😁 I'm with you 👊
Hi! I have a Sony a6400 and 18-105 f.4 lens. During video recirding I have a problem with AF during zoom in and zoom out. The focus is very unstable and the image is flickering, slipping .. I sent to you a link that you can see that problem that I don't know how to solve. drive.google.com/drive/folders/1yLMIXUH7L4E9jGGUXLWplzIlq4h430zc
I'm looking at this on my phone, but may need a bigger screen to double check. What are you AF settings (AF-S, AF-C?). White balance? Shutter speed and what frame rate? Also, have you updated the firmware in both the camera and the lens? The lens does have a separate firmware that needs to be updated.
Yes, it needs to be viewed on a bigger screen, on a computer ... so it's better to see. AF-C, WB I changed, tried a few variants, so that's not it. Shutter speed 1/50, frame rate 30. It is on manual settings and the same problem is in program mode. I didn't update the camera or the lens ... I didn't know that the lens could be updated as well? I bought it in May this year, and I didn't do any updates ... maybe that's it? I'll try that in the next few days! Also, if I noticed well in posts from YT, other models (Sony a7 for example) have the AF lock-on / off option .. and the Sony a6400 doesn't have that ...? Thanks for your replay!
Correct. I’d be interested in testing how it compares. I may just pick it up to take a look. The one thing though is the barrel extension with the Zoom, but I rarely use a gimbal.
The current link may have an "inflated" price as they sometimes fluctuate, but it's still available at ~$550 USD... And yes, for good glass which is not a kit lens, that's a deal. What are you currently filming with?
@@KevinRossRN I own multiple cameras, one of them is the A6400. Basically I need something like the 17-50 f/2.8 with IS, which is considered a normal zoom range (but with a faster constant aperture). The Sony kit version is a powerzoom, and it's slow. They don't have an f/2.8 version with IS. F/4 is too slow for narratives.
This is perfect combo, am rocking A6400 & 18-105 & Sigma 30mm. Already more than enough to get the job done!
Yes! That's an awesome combo there! What do you mostly film?
I'm doing the exact same set up.😂
It’s a great setup. 🤘
Alright now, let's get those permission slips signed. We're going on a field trip!
2am here and i keep searching update 2019, of sonya6400 and the sony 18-105 lens , suddenly notify ! 💃🏼💃🏼💃🏼💃🏼wooo u make me get that lens than , kitlens omgoood i love the oss so smooth, i saw ur last video ... thank you for sharing!
My pleasure...2am? Get some rest 😀If you decide on picking up the lens, feel free to bounce back on what you think of it. Keep rockin' 👊
Nice video man, I've ordered the a6400 and the 18-105, looking forward to testing it out.
You did!? Super stoked for you! Definitely keep me posted on how it's going.
Mostly video, or will you be incorporating some photos in your workflow?
Kevin Ross I’m a hybrid shooter, that autofocus tracking hooked me.
@@Built2DIY it's an awesome piece of kit... Really. I'll be curious as to what you think. 📸👊
Kevin Ross I appreciate your content brother.
@@Built2DIY Well I appreciate you saying so. 🙏 #grateful
Hey brother, i really like your channel and find it really useful and helpful for someone like me that is trying to get more into photography.
Am recently working to get my first camera manly for landscape and street photography.
Next year 2022 am going to do the caminho de Santiago pilgrimage and i really want to have a camera with me to do some landscape photography and some street photography during the 10 to 15 days that the pilgrimage will take to complete.
In your opinion do you think that this combination of a sony a6400 and the 18-105 lens is a good combination for someone that is just starting.
Am taking the Gopro hero 9 black for my POV and for vlogging, so the camera is strictly for photography.
Thanks for everything and keep up the amazing work brother
Hey Paulo, that sounds like an awesome experience you have coming up. So it looks like you’re focused more on photography, which is great if that’s the case.
Are you set on the Sony ecosystem and if so, have you seen the soon to be released Sony ZV-E10 amzn.to/2V3JDcl
It’s very similar to the a6400 and is marketed to vloggers, however that’s really just a marketing angle because it’ll take great photos as well.
And, for photos, I would steer you closer to the Tamron here: amzn.to/3zTiaZw
Or the 18-135 here: amzn.to/3fcx8Ci
The Tamron has a wider aperture which means it’ll let in more light. Either of these lenses would fit on the ZV-E10, a6400 or a6600.
I have this lens and am very happy with it. I want a low light lens/one lens do all and was thinking of the 16-55 but it’s toooooo expensive. With the tamron leak of 17-70 2.8 with stabilization, would you be tempted to sell your 18-105 for the upcoming tamron?
I’d really have to test it out, which I’m interested to do so. One concern I’d probably have is losing some of that focal length...however, I may also be pleasantly surprised and not really miss it 🤷♂️
@@KevinRossRN that’s what I’m thinking also. Thanks!
You bet. 👊💥
Thanks for your nice video.
I just bought A6400.
I'm new in the cameras world but got a bit knowledge. now I need your recommendation.
My main purpose mostly is filmmaking , and photography as well. SO what do think of below options
1- zoom lens Tamron 28-75 f2.8 + wide lens 16mm f1.4
2- zoom lens 18-105 f4 + 56mm f1.4 for portrait
??????
AND soon I will purchase a gimbal Weebill S.
So, the 18-105 combo paired up with the 56mm would be my choice if you're doing some portrait work, however I have used the 18-105 for some photo work, and it's fine...but not my primary choice as the 18-105 is better for video.
The Tamron is a great lens, but it's for full-frame. The e-mount will certainly fit onto the 6400 (APS-C) body, but your focal length will be around 40mm -112mm. Not sure if that's a concern or not, but just wanted to highlight that.
Great video... I Just picked up the a6400 with the kit lens. I plan to shoot talking head vids for now so I was looking at the sigma 16 but now that I’ve come across this I’m wondering if I should get this one instead. Seems like this is more versatile lens. Any recommendations?
Congrats on the 6400. As far as talking head videos, I personally use the Sigma 16mm. For all of them actually.
I did start out using the 18-105 for my talking head, and as long as you have decent lighting then it’ll be fine.
I just stumbled upon your vid. I've been eye balling the 18-105 for a while for my a6400 (also I love with my sigma 16mm 1.4) bro your vid is awsome!! I gotta get the 18-105 now. Just Subed to your Channel. When's this trip I'm ready to go 🤣
Ha! I own other lenses, but these are pretty much the only two I carry around. Love this combo. I bet you will too 😉
Another trip coming soon. 📸
Hi I'm buying the A6400 with kitlens 16-50 and sony 18-105 f4. i want to buy one more lens but I'm confused whether i should go with the sigma16mm f1.4 or the sigma 30mm f1.4.
My use is travel vlogging so what should i choose. Please let me know.
Thank you
I'm sorry kevin I'm here again but this is the last one I promise 😂
I have the 18-105 and the 16mm. It's a pretty stellar setup. So, I personally prefer the 16 over the 30...If I shoot portraits I end up using the 85mm.
My 16-50 however hasn't seen much action in quite a long time, but definitely a hard lens to pass up for 100USD
what's the bracket for ?
Hi bro,I use this lens with my sony a6400 for video, but for photography the quality is not very good and I don't know why
Yeah it’s a great video lens, but I’d say the 18-135 is better for photography. I’ve gotten some nice shots with it, but I’ll admit I’ve had to take more shots than I normally would.
Hi! Great video! Is it completely handheld? It looks really stable. Did you apply stabilization in post? (like warp stabilizer?)
Thanks! Yes, all handheld. That's the beauty of having that OSS lens. The only thing I applied was optical flow with some of those speed ramps, but didn't need to apply stabilization in the other clips, like where I was walking around town vlogging...That's just the natural look out of that lens.
I've had a lot of practice doing handheld as I used to vlog all the time and I'm usually more run and gun without stabilizers anyway...
Although for commercial work I would mix it up between the two (handheld and a gimbal).
Your videos are awesome!
And you are awesome for saying so. Appreciate you taking the time to let me know. 📸👊💥
In 2020, are you still strong on the a6400?
I'm considering getting it for my Dad. He has a woodworking shop he wants to start doing UA-cam videos in. Dimensions are a rectangular 200 sq.ft. (10'x20' approx). There will be lighting specifically for shooting (source lights, soft boxes, etc.). I believe I will end up doing most of the video work while he manages the tools lol. I don't have much experience with video, but knowing the constraints on the intended use; would the a6400 and this Sigma lens make sense for shooting these videos?
I don't believe this lens has any macro function which is something I know he wants, for close up on certain tasks, but he is looking for a more cinematic look, rather than the prototypical wide angle shot that DIY'ers use. Really, wants to avoid the entire ensemble of prototypical UA-cam woodworking videos; the wide angle shot, normally coupled with the sped up video, backed by the chipmunk audio of shop sounds :D Not bashing it, I just know from speaking with him, that isn't his cup of tea, nor his intention.
With the specific lighting in the shop for video work, I would imagine we could get away with f4, I think the main concern is the macro requirements, and if the shots will be too close given the shape of the garage, and the fact that there are tools to work around.
Thanks!
I still use the 6400 daily.
As far as the macro, you could look at something affordable like this lens from Sony: amzn.to/3n25mdy
You can also just use it for portrait style, or just as a regular lens. It would be about a 50mm equivalent on a full-frame, but not built in zoom. It would be a fixed focal length. There are other macro options that are a bit more expensive though.
Is he going to do any handheld shots or mostly locked of on a tripod or stand?
Hi Kevin,
Appreciate the honest and candid reviews!
Subbed and going through a few of your videos on Sony’s APCS cams and lenses.
Nice Atlas backpack. I have the same. Super comfortable. Allan nailed it.
I just purchased the a6600 for when I need portability and I don’t want to bring my ff.
For stills, I shoot mostly landscape, street, portrait, products, action sports, and travel. I use mix of primes and zooms, in particular Tamron 17-28/2.8 and 28-75/2.8. I believe I can use them on the a6600 but it will be cropped 1.5x.
For videos, I will start up and wanted to get your thoughts on the following options:
- Option1: Go with the 10-18/4 (like the ultra-wide and OSS) + 18-105/4 (like the internal zoom and OSS) + Sigma 16/1.4 (for lowlight); or
- Option2: Use my EF and EFS glasses with Viltrox EF-E ii which supposedly can take advantage of the afc but there is not much videos out there about it. I use the MC-11 for my ff bodies and stills works well (not all) but video afc doesn’t work. I just love Sony af system.
Thanks in advance! Keep creating and stay safe.
Very thankful for your feedback!
Yes, the Sony AF is just absurd how good it is. And, if you've done a little research then you might find that some of that EF glass may take advantage of it (I don't have any to test), but it depends on what you want/need for real world as far as how fast. Now, the Sigma you asked about here is freakin fast as a third party. Just as fast anything Sony native. I barely take take that lens off. I shoot with it so much. However I do love the 18-105. It was my first lens purchase. I strictly use this for video however. Sure, it can shoot photo and I did do a video on that with the a6500, but I'd steer you over to the 18-135 if you're going to use it mostly for photo. Although tough to beat the constant f4 though when punching in since the 18-135 is variable.
Question though, how much to you think you'd be using the 10-18 if you had the Sigma? The equivalent FF focal length on the Sigma is 24mm, so if you need wider then I understand. Tamron is definitely a great lens...Have you already tried that on the a6600 to see what that looks like or are you still waiting on the body to come in?
Just trying to see about pairing some things down here if needed and making sure you don't have too much overlap with your focal lengths, however I'll admit that it is nice to have some options.
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the quick reply.
Yeah the EF lenses in stills with the MC-11 is very fast on the A9. Got it for a steal but the a6600 will get me into video.
The a6600 is on the way so I need to wait for it to come to test it on the Tamron 17-28/2.8 and 28-75/2.8. They are both tact sharp and fast for stills. Haven’t done much with it on video
Yes I don’t want overlap and heavy setup for video and why I am looking to see if the a6600 + 18-105/4 + 16/1.4 or 10-18/4 is a better combo. The 16/1.4 is great for lowlight + bokeh + tact sharp and the 10-18/4 has OSS + wider field of view.
I’m new to video but plan to shoot broll, street, landscape, product, and travel. Which combo would you recommend?
Thank you!
For video, I'm just going to go back to what my two (best) lenses are in my bag. The 18-105 and the Sigma 16. I've traveled with only these two lenses for video work and it's all I've needed. Except one scenario where the 10-18 may be more helpful and that is (for me) real estate video. This is where I highly recommend a wider angle...Now of course you don't have to be a real estate photographer or videographer. It's just nice if you find yourself getting establishing shots in tighter spaces. You'll likely get a little bit of lens distortion that you may need to crop in on or correct for in post, but very minimal.
Let's throw in another thought. Are you aware about the "zoom" function with these cameras when using primes? You may have researched it, but I did a video on it. You don't have to check it out or anything, however it may help you think about getting just a touch more out of that 10-18 if you really want it. ua-cam.com/video/PYZLs5AhQ-I/v-deo.html
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for sharing! Looks like I will get all 3 lenses then; 18-105/4 for all rounder with OSS, 16/1.4 for lowlight, and 10-18/4 for landscape.
And thank you for the link. Yes I use the clear image function. It is programed in my C2 buttom as well as my C1 for Super35. I don’t use Super 35 as much as it crops from 24M to 10M.
Awesome! Happy to help and definitely (when you have time), feel free to circle back around and let me know what you think of the set up.
Great video! Do you use a UV filter with the lens?
Thanks! During the day, I do use a ND filter, yes.
Thanks, Kevin. I was wondering if it is worth buying a variable ND filter for this lens? I will be doing a lot of daytime shooting on vacation in Norway!
I often use one when out and about. They really do help.
Thanks, Kevin. Super helpful! 🙋🏻♂️
Glad to help. Best of luck on your adventure.
Great video! I have been considering switching to this combo for video purposes. I currently have a 6d Mark II with 70-200 F4 and 35mm F2. I really got it for photography but have found that I enjoy video work much more. I will be doing a wedding in August and then after that will mostly just film bow hunts? Would you think swapping my current setup for this one would be a good idea?
I think Sony for video work offers a bit more than what your current setup is... If you're already considering, then I'd say you're moving into a very capable piece of kit for video. This is APS-C, and not sure if you'd be more interested in full-frame... But honestly this camera (and the 6600) are more than capable.
Is this Walking vlog with the 18-105 handheld ?
Yes indeed it is! 👍What do you think about it? Does it work?
@@KevinRossRN I think 18-105mm is the Best Lens for Vlogging, I had sold my A6400 due to Kit 16-50mm OIS was very bad, thinking to buy the A6400 again but this time with 18-105mm, Also the clear zoom is very useful!
Hey, the 18-105 was my first lens purchase (outside of getting the kit lens). Love it for vlogging.
I just bought my 18-105 lens have used it yet but I herd so much good stuff about this do you have any other recommendations for another lens that you use daily
I use the Sigma 16mm every day. It just depends on what you’re filming and where. What are you mostly filming?
Would you say this lens and the sigma 16 would be a good option for my first lenses to film weddings and other video projects or should I look elsewhere?
Which camera body will you be using?
@@KevinRossRN A6400
Gotcha...I assume you'll be doing photos as well? Have you looked at the 18-135: amzn.to/35er86f
@@KevinRossRN I’m doing straight up video. I have the kit lens but I want one lens to do it all or two lens. Where do you recommend I start? I’m not trying to break the bank either lol
@@KevinRossRN is this lens good enough to film weddings?
What are good lens for car photography. I have 6400 with 50mm lens . My next lens I want something what can give compression if needed also detailed pics . The 50mm I can shoot at night . I usually shoot sun set not dark dark
So looking for a Zoom, or prime? Also, are you concerned with an OSS lens, or not so much?
Kevin Ross yes a prime lens . And yeah that would help I’m also on a budget . I got the 18-105 for 400 basically new from a friend . Now I have about 250-300 for next lens
@@kong_5oh163 Have you looked at the Sigma 56: amzn.to/2xZbNcr (this is a bundle)...
A little outside of your budget, but sharp. The 30mm is nice too, but would give you an "actual" 50mm.
Unfortunately anything from Sony (OSS), except for the 50mm is hard to find within that budget.
Have you looked at some of the Samyang lenses?
Great video! So since you said you are all about conversing with your subscribers in the comment section..I want to run something by you...7 months ago I got into drones...13 drones and a UA-cam channel later lol I have been using gopros and my iPhone XS for outdoor shots of the drones, talking to the camera and indoor unboxings and reviews. Now indoor my studio is kinda low light..even with some added lighting, so the GoPro hero 8 doesn’t do that well..plus I’m still learning the darn things and so I decided to start researching mirrorless cameras, lenses and all the technical stuff. Now that I feel more comfortable I have decided the Sony a6400 is the right camera for me. I’ll tell you what lenses I have in mind and why, and I was hoping you could tell me if I’m on the right path or if I should go with something else. I don’t just want to buy lenses for my drone video stuff, I’d like to have room to grow and experiment with landscape and portrait shots, as well as some sort of simple music videos for my music projects. So for low light, night time, reviews in my dark studio I figured the sigma 16mm would be good since it has that 1.8 or 1.4 (can’t remember at the moment) also I only have about 6-7 feet to move the camera away from me so I think it’ll be good to get myself, my desk and whatever I’m reviewing in the frame. But I also don’t want it to look to wide and stretched out. I figure it’ll be good for outdoor stuff too, dark or light! Then I thought since I can’t find a lens with that 1.4 or 1.8 aperture with a focal range of 18-100+ I might want to get another 1.4 or 1.8 prime lens like a 30mm or a 50mm, so I have another option for low light as well. Just sucks I won’t have the ability to zoom as far as I know...now for the daytime, bright sunny days I was thinking this lens, the 18-105. But I wonder is the f4 something you really need a Bright sunny day for? Would something closer to 2.0 or 3.0 be better? Since the other lenses I chose for low light can be adjusted to 4whatever aperture I need I consider those good for bright daylight as well. Most of what I do is for video by the way , but like I said I’d like to do some photography as well. So in summary..sigma 16mm, Sony 30mm and Sony 18/105. Does it sound like I’m on the right path? If I had to choose just two lenses for what I want to shoot which ones would you pick , or if I had to choose 3. I’m def not interested in the kit lenses lol. Anyways, sorry for the lengthy comment, thanks in advance for the help!
I appreciate all the information here. So let's break it down.
As far as the Sigma 16mm, I really can't say enough good things about it. And, for your particular indoor need of being in a small space, it should be just fine. In my talking head portions of my videos (in studio) I'm about an arm's length away from the camera. As far as the zoom functionality on the prime lenses, I did do a video here: ua-cam.com/video/PYZLs5AhQ-I/v-deo.html
You've got an option to get a bit more length out of the lens.
Now, as far as the 30mm, it's also a great lens. The 56mm however would give you an 85mm equivalent and this could also be used for portraiture at a longer focal distance...if that's something you're interested in.
The 18-105 for video is a tough one to beat. If you told me that you'd be doing more photo than video then I might steer you over to the 18-135: amzn.to/2B5vzFe It's better for photo in my opinion, but only slightly. It also has a variable aperture f/3.5-5.6, so not a constant f4 all the way through.
If you're outside, then f/4 is fine. In fact, if you're in the sun then you're likely going to be somewhere at f/11 or higher. Unless you're using ND filters, which I most definitely use and I especially use these on the Sigma outdoors. It's almost a must have.
As I've said before, if I had the 16mm and the 18-105 in my bag, then I wouldn't need much else. In fact, on many shoots these are often the only lenses in my bag for video.
And you're right about the kit lens. Sure, it's nice as a start to get familiar with the camera and filmmaking, but once you go beyond the kit lens, it just takes your production way up.
Kevin Ross thank you so much! Exactly what I needed to hear! I’ll check out that video too!
Sorry for the bunched together text. sometimes I get to typing and forget to hit the return button lol. I know this wasn’t mentioned but I also found a 50mm 1.8 OSS for $150 used. And even though it’s not one I considered, for the price I thought why not? Def gonna go with the 16 and the 18-105 though! One other question, what is the Benefit of using a filter instead of adjusting the aperture?
$150, uh yeah. If it's in good shape, might as well.
As far as the filter goes let's say that you'd like to have some bokeh or to keep some separation foreground and background, and being able to come in at f/1.4-2.0 to keep that separation would be hard in daylight as you'd be overexposed. The filter would give you that option of stopping down without messing with your aperture.
And a kind of silly reason would be that it's also faster...but you also have to get used to a filter just so you're not vignetting or getting the "X" pattern across the lens...that happens more when you are really stopped down.
Very well explained friend. Thanks
Appreciate you being here.
Great review! How did you do the slow motions? 1080p 60/120fps and then upscaled it to 4k? Cause the a6400 can only do 30fps in 4k
Thanks...And yes, 1080p 60, then upscaled. I do use 120 from time to time, but only in circumstances where I really need it, and in low light 120 is going to be a bit softer.
I posted another video on stabilizing handheld footage (no gimbal) and I did shoot most (if not all) in 4K/30, and slowed some of it down without losing a lot of the quality.
Kevin Ross thanks for your answer! one more question, do you combine the upscaled 1080p footage with native 4k?
@@tomikispal Yep! Happy to help. That's my work flow. All combined in a 4k 24p timeline.
Great video thanks for the info! Is the lens usable for indoor shooting? Like for interviews, cooking B roll etc. I don't have the budget for professional lighting, so I can only use desk lamps etc.
And If i want bokey for b roll shots indoors, I suppose I'll need to zoom in to 50 mm and above, is it possible to get good stable handheld shots had this focal length?
The lens is great, but for bokeh, that’ll be a bit challenging because of the f/4. You’d want something in the 1.4 to 2.8 range.
The lens is stabilized and I use it quite a bit for handheld footage. But, without that lighting you may have a tougher time with it. I’d prioritize lighting first, then the lens.
@@KevinRossRN thanks! I understand, lighting is just so expensive though....
What’s your budget?
@@KevinRossRN around 600 euros. The 18-105 is on sale now for 390 euros. Is 200 euros enough for some decent lighting?
That's a great deal on the lens. You're going to thank me later when you invest in lighting. Here, I did a super budget lighting setup that could work: ua-cam.com/video/iWyRSea3agc/v-deo.html this is like hardware store, assemble it how you need to.
Here's the Godox SL-60W: amzn.to/36dCr08 this should take you to an Amazon site in your country. I use these and also did videos on them as well. They're great to start, and very reasonably priced.
This footage on walking is gimbal included?
No gimbal was used in the shots.
Nice vid 😊👍 i also own this lens and i love it... But my wife often complain, bcos she thinks that her face often looks shorter.. do u feel that this lens have a distortion result for portrait? I used it at arround 35-85mm f4.. 😊🙏 Thx
That's really interesting at that focal length you mentioned. I know that the wider Sigma 16mm does, but I've never really noted this with the 18-105... Have you tested it with other portraiture and getting similar results? Also, are you on the 6400?
@@KevinRossRN yes i'm on a6400 and i also own sima 16mm which i sometime use for portrait but on certain distance of course and it never let us down 😊👍 wanna try only to bring the 18-105 for travel but i have a big doubt now 😂
@@davidsunarto I can appreciate you have some doubts. Are you able to pack both the Sigma and the 18-105 for your travels?
@@KevinRossRN actually i can but wanna stick with 1 lens only, cos already packed with tons of stuff for 3 kids 😂 that's the main reason... 😋 just wondering if u could try shoot and compare to another similiar focal length fixed portrait lens, and let me know the result. I would really appreciate it 🙏🙏🙏 nb: if only u have spare time 😊👍
What do u think about 18-135mm?
Good lens, but it's better for photography. Also, it doesn't have internal zoom, the lens extends during zoom, which obviously will impact the use of that lens on a gimbal.
Great video, really helpful!
Thanks! Glad it helped.
Will the optical stabilization helps to stabilize b roll shooting purpose?
To clarify, are you talking about the rolling shutter, like when you whip pan the camera left to right (or vice-versa)?
@@KevinRossRN thanksnfor replying my comment 🙌. And yes thats right. Also for punch in and out movement.
So, with the stabilized lens, it will help a bit with some of the warping that can occur with handheld, but rolling shutter is unfortunately not going to be corrected... This is just how the sensor is setup in these cameras... The full frame cameras do better with this, but it's still there...
Although, not sure how much you follow Sony, but the soon to be released A7siii has significantly improved rolling shutter, or rather less rolling shutter.
It's just the way these sensors sit in the camera body... I agree though, it's annoying.
@@KevinRossRN the full frame is kinda out of my reach lol. And I also filming for hobby and it might get commercial later idk. So I am thinking of getting these pair as my first serious camera. I mostly shoot with my phone right now. So would you suggest for this combo or maybe the a6500 suites better?
I would say to try and stay on budget because once you go full frame you will spend more on lenses (usually). The a6500 is still very capable. I still own this camera. The stabilization in the camera isn't the greatest, but it's there, and if you have a stabilized camera body, then this opens up more opportunities to invest in third party lenses... Which don't have stabilization in the lens, but are very sharp.
What nd filter strength do you use in the sunlight while vlogging? Also, do you shoot shutter priority or full manual?
Since it's f4, I can typically get away with (in bright sunlight) with about 6-8 stops with this filter: amzn.to/2NLPvza
For a lens that's wide open and I actually want to remain open for whatever reason, I'd bump up to a filter that can go between 12-16 stops depending on the conditions.
Manual. When filming with these cameras so much you just get things set up where manual can still be "fast." Do you have this particular lens, or looking into picking one up?
What ND filter do you use for it
I use these on my lenses. Good on a budget: amzn.to/2QcUhZy
I'm using the A6300 is literally the same and will probably work out.
Of course! I'm certain you will get great results and enjoy it on your (very capable) a6300.
@@KevinRossRN oh thx m8, i bought this lens already, would you recommend using the a6300 with the 18-105mm + the zhiyun crane m2 gimbal? Or is the set up too heavy for the smal gimbal?
Unfortunately my friend, that's going to be a bit much on that particular gimbal.
@@KevinRossRN hmm so the Zhiyun Crane "plus" is the answer
Yep. Still aggressively priced and should be able to get you what you need my friend.
You are completely awesome
What bag was that
Thanks! 👊Are you asking about the camera backpack?
Kevin Ross
Yes
@@pierrenj79 it's the Atlas Athlete Pack... My all time fav camera backpack. Definitely an investment, so not the cheapest, but worth it to protect my gear. Not sponsored, just my honest opinion.
Kevin Ross thanks kev 👑
@@pierrenj79 my pleasure, friend 👊📸
Great video 👍🏽
Thanks! Keep rockin'
You can't fool us Toby! Michael's gonna get you! JK! Nice review!
Ha! I'm not superstitious I'm just a little stitious.
Thanks!
@@KevinRossRN Bought the a6400 and I'm loving it, the kit lens is so sick with x2 zoom on video minimal loss, bought a 85mm sony 1.8 and I love the crop factor getting more telephoto-ish :) , I'm pairing it with my Canon 6D for video.
@@Tekillyah I use the 85mm for landscapes and also for a little sports photog. It's fast!
Glad you're loving the 6400...and yes, that kit lens (for 100USD), is worth it.
i knew these street signs looked familiar!!!
Ha! You from or live in the area?
Kevin Ross yeah, im actually thinking about getting this lens! should i? i want to use it to vlog/create films
I love this lens... What camera body are you filming with right now, and what other lenses to you have at the moment?
Kevin Ross i have a 6500 and am using the sony 10-18mm
Gotcha. So you're going to get similar performance, and the 10-18 being an f/4 throughout the focal length is also a benefit of the 18-105. This lens (the 18-105) was my first vlogging lens...the first lens I actually purchased. The 10-18 is definitely nice if you need that wider perspective, but as I said in the video, the 18mm works fine for me as far as distance from my face. I assume you've checked the 18mm focal length on your lens to see if you'll be okay with that starting focal length?
The Sigma 16mm and the 18-105 are my two (main) lenses for just about all the filming I do out in the field. Do keep in mind that if you do purchase the 18-105 to double check that the firmware on the lens is updated...not that I had issues with it, but the update seemed to help grab focus quicker.
You're a legend
Thanks! I guess it’s all down hill from here😀
Why not 18-135 which comes with the body
Fantastic question, and something I meant to address in this video specifically, although I may end up reviewing/comparing these lenses.
A couple of differences is that the 18-135 has that variable aperture that may not suit certain filming conditions. The focal length goes to 135, which is obviously more than the 18-105, however if you're working on a gimbal, as you Zoom you start to lose the balance on that set up since the Zoom is not internal. The power zoom function on the 18-105 can also be a benefit with video.
The 18-135 is a newer lens, and some say it's pretty sharp (and some say sharper than 18-105), but I think you'd have to ask yourself what you're going to be using the lens for primarily. For video, this lens is just really hard to beat for the price.
What are you currently filming with? Or, are you looking to get into the Sony ecosystem?
Looking to enter Sony ecosystem.. basically for travel photography and videography, so I'm a bit confused which lens to take..
@@srdugar have you thought about renting the lens for a week? If using for more photo than video, the 18-135 might be the choice.
@@KevinRossRN No OSS...that is a killer difference
Ooops...wrong lens in mind...been dealing with wishing for 18-55 2.8 with OSS
EIGHTEEN ONE ZERO FIVE LENS IS JUST AWESOME
It’s a good all around lens 🤙
Would you take this one over the Sony 16-70 F4? Reviews for that one are all over the place.
I would. The extra focal length to 105mm is nice, and 18mm (for me) is still wide enough. What are you mostly filming?
@@KevinRossRN I don't work on anything specific. I have gear acquisition syndrome and I'm trying to squash it before I lose my mind. You have me leaning towards the 18-105 and hopefully I'll be done spending money.
@Kevin Ross I have the sigma trio which are great for photos on the A6500. I started tinkering with A-mount zooms because they were cheaper and had good specs but the adapter seems to cause the AF to suck. I haven’t really tried a lot of video and I know you video guys all seem to love the 18-105.
@@rondub If you've got the trio then you've definitely got a great set of tools there. Yes, I too went off a recommendation from a creator several years back regarding the 18-105 for video... Professionally it's paid for itself many times over, but even for some of the personal documentary work and other cinematic shots... It's more than filled the need.
Can't imagine with the trio and the 18-105 (if you choose to get it) that you'd need anything else, but hey many of us do love gear acquisitions 😁 I'm with you 👊
1:18 bro did u just feed chocolate to your dog?
No, it was a dog treat... Although she's gotten into some chocolate candy before and not had issues 🤷♂️... But that certainly wasn't intentional.
Hi! I have a Sony a6400 and 18-105 f.4 lens. During video recirding I have a problem with AF during zoom in and zoom out.
The focus is very unstable and the image is flickering, slipping .. I sent to you a link that you can see that problem that I don't know how to solve.
drive.google.com/drive/folders/1yLMIXUH7L4E9jGGUXLWplzIlq4h430zc
I'm looking at this on my phone, but may need a bigger screen to double check.
What are you AF settings (AF-S, AF-C?). White balance? Shutter speed and what frame rate?
Also, have you updated the firmware in both the camera and the lens? The lens does have a separate firmware that needs to be updated.
Yes, it needs to be viewed on a bigger screen, on a computer ... so it's better to see. AF-C, WB I changed, tried a few variants, so that's not it. Shutter speed 1/50, frame rate 30. It is on manual settings and the same problem is in program mode. I didn't update the camera or the lens ... I didn't know that the lens could be updated as well? I bought it in May this year, and I didn't do any updates ... maybe that's it? I'll try that in the next few days! Also, if I noticed well in posts from YT, other models (Sony a7 for example) have the AF lock-on / off option .. and the Sony a6400 doesn't have that ...? Thanks for your replay!
Tamron 17-70 f2.8 its gonna be destroy this lenses
Tamron and Sigma make some great lenses for Sony. Just wish they were OSS.
Tamron 17-70 have VC "vibration compensation"
Correct. I’d be interested in testing how it compares. I may just pick it up to take a look. The one thing though is the barrel extension with the Zoom, but I rarely use a gimbal.
Bro u call $700 a budget lens woww
The current link may have an "inflated" price as they sometimes fluctuate, but it's still available at ~$550 USD... And yes, for good glass which is not a kit lens, that's a deal.
What are you currently filming with?
Not good enough for narrative indie short films. The f/4 is too slow. I wish Sony had a 17-55 f/2.8 like Canon has, with IS.
Are you currently filming with Sony? What other lenses have you looked into?
@@KevinRossRN I own multiple cameras, one of them is the A6400. Basically I need something like the 17-50 f/2.8 with IS, which is considered a normal zoom range (but with a faster constant aperture). The Sony kit version is a powerzoom, and it's slow. They don't have an f/2.8 version with IS. F/4 is too slow for narratives.
Understood. I think Sony did a huge disservice with the 16-55 2.8 by not adding the OSS in that lens.